Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Cisco Joins Microsoft, IBM in Vatican Pledge For Ethical AI Use and Development
  2. Apple ID Lock-Out Affects Macs, iPhones, iPads, and iCloud Services
  3. Russia Vetoes U.N. Resolution On Nuclear Weapons In Space
  4. A School Principal Was Framed With an AI-Generated Rant
  5. Boeing Accused of Retaliating Against Two Engineers in 2022
  6. $5.6 Million in Refunds Sent to Ring Customers, Settling Unauthorized Access and Privacy Violations
  7. The ‘Ceph’ Community Now Stores 1,000 Petabytes in Its Open Source Storage Solution
  8. Two Lifeforms Merge Into One Organism For First Time In a Billion Years
  9. Intel’s Stock Drops 9%. Are They Struggling to Remain Relevant?
  10. A Windows Vulnerability Reported by the NSA Was Exploited To Install Russian Malware
  11. EyeEm Will License Users’ Photos To Train AI If They Don’t Delete Them
  12. China Reveals Most Detailed Geological Map of the Moon Ever Created
  13. Europe Plans To Build 100-Qubit Quantum Computer By 2026
  14. Ring Customers Get $5.6 Million In Refunds In Privacy Settlement
  15. Xbox Console Sales Are Tanking As Microsoft Brings Games To PS5

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Cisco Joins Microsoft, IBM in Vatican Pledge For Ethical AI Use and Development

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Associated Press:
Tech giant Cisco Systems on Wednesday joined Microsoft and IBM in signing onto a Vatican-sponsored pledge to ensure artificial intelligence is developed and used ethically and to benefit the common good… The pledge outlines key pillars of ethical and responsible use of AI. It emphasizes that AI systems must be designed, used and regulated to serve and protect the dignity of all human beings, without discrimination, and their environments. It highlights principles of transparency, inclusion, responsibility, impartiality and security as necessary to guide all AI developments.

The document was unveiled and signed at a Vatican conference on Feb. 28, 2020… Pope Francis has called for an international treaty to ensure AI is developed and used ethically, devoting his annual peace message this year to the topic.

Apple ID Lock-Out Affects Macs, iPhones, iPads, and iCloud Services

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Times of India:
Several Apple customers were inexplicably locked out of their Apple ID accounts Friday evening in a major service disruption, forcing them to reset their passwords across all devices and services. According to user reports on social media, the widespread outage began around 8 p.m. ET. People complained that they were abruptly signed out of their Apple IDs on Macs, iPhones, iPads, and other Apple devices.

When attempting to sign back in with their existing passwords, they received an error message preventing access… To regain access, users had to go through Apple’s account recovery process to reset their Apple ID passwords. However, many reported difficulties even completing the reset process initially due to high demand…

The outage affected iCloud services like iCloud Drive, iMessage, FaceTime, and the App Store. Third-party apps and services that integrate with Apple ID sign-in were also disrupted for those impacted.

That’s one way of being secure

By quonset • Score: 3 Thread

Make it so no one can get to your documents. Not even you.

Weird

By schematix • Score: 3 Thread
Last weekend I gave an old iPhone 7 Plus to someone whose daughter needed it for a diabetes monitor app. I factory reset it and unlinked my Apple ID. When it powered back up it said it was now owned by 1*******@1*******. Definitely not me. Apple wouldn’t help regain ownership even with the original sales receipt from 2017. So no app for the little girl and I have a brick phone.

“Their devices”

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 3 Thread

I’m so glad I got off the Apple bandwagon when they started ignoring the Mac for iPhone.

I actually had linux running on my MBP for a while before buying a PC laptop to when it was time to upgrade.

Every convenience feature is potential spyware when they could have done it cryptographically secure from the beginning.

I actually had a good chat with on-staff cryptographers back in the 90’s. This one gal was a genius at elliptic curves

Those were the days.

Always required internet devices are bad idea

By jonfr • Score: 3 Thread

The idea that all devices should require a internet connection, always to work is a bad idea. I hope this always online connected needed for device to work stops soon. It has to stop. Since this can’t go on as is.

Russia Vetoes U.N. Resolution On Nuclear Weapons In Space

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
This week Russia vetoed a UN resolution that proposed banning nuclear weapons in space, CNN reports.

But it all happened “amid U.S. intelligence-backed concerns that Moscow is trying to develop a nuclear device capable of destroying satellites.”
In February, President Joe Biden confirmed the US has intelligence that Russia is developing a nuclear anti-satellite capability. Three sources familiar with the intelligence subsequently told CNN the weapon could destroy satellites by creating a massive energy wave when detonated…

US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield said Wednesday’s vote “marks a real missed opportunity to rebuild much-needed trust in existing arms control obligations.” A US and Japan-drafted resolution had received cross-regional support from more than 60 member states. It intended to strengthen and uphold the global non-proliferation regime, including in outer space, and reaffirm the shared goal of maintaining outer space for peaceful purposes. It also called on UN member states not to develop nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction designed to be placed in Earth’s orbit....

Experts say this kind of weapon could have the potential to wipe out mega constellations of small satellites, like SpaceX’s Starlink, which has been successfully used by Ukraine to counter Russian troops. This would almost certainly be “a last-ditch weapon” for Russia, the US official and other sources said — because it would do the same damage to whatever Russian satellites were also in the area.
The article notes that in March Russian President Vladimir Putin “told officials that space projects, including the setup of a nuclear power unit in space, should be a priority and receive proper financing.”

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the news.

Re:Already prohibited

By CaptainDork • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Correct:

“The UN Outer Space Treaty of 1967 prohibits the placement of nuclear weapons or any other weapons of mass destruction in orbit around the Earth, on celestial bodies, or in outer space in general. This treaty aims to maintain outer space as a peaceful environment for the benefit of all humanity. Therefore, both Russia and other signatory states are bound by this prohibition and are not allowed to deploy such weapons in space. The UN Outer Space Treaty of 1967 prohibits the placement of nuclear weapons or any other weapons of mass destruction in orbit around the Earth, on celestial bodies, or in outer space in general. This treaty aims to maintain outer space as a peaceful environment for the benefit of all humanity. Therefore, both Russia and other signatory states are bound by this prohibition and are not allowed to deploy such weapons in space.”

Space debris

By manu0601 • Score: 3 Thread
Killing satellites using nuclear EMP would make less space debris that using a conventional missile, as it would only destroy electronics. But the dead satellites could then collide with others without any way to move them away.

Re:Nukes

By test321 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Children deportations are not contested by Russians, they are proud of taking Ukrainian children into Russia and having them adopted by Russian families. The matter was lengthily discussed at the United Nations and elsewhere https://press.un.org/en/2023/s… The mere existence of the decree lead UN’s ICC to issue a War Crime arrest warrant for facts of genocide, against Putin and Russia’s High commissioner for Children’s rights as they are the authorities who signed the decree. You can consult pictures of Ukrainian children in the process of deportation on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Propaganda

By RossCWilliams • Score: 3 Thread
Like everything else on the internet, this is propaganda. Somehow it fails to mention any amendments proposed to the resolution. Like the one that sought to ban all military uses of space. It also fails to discuss existing treaties on nuclear weapons in space. Instead it repeats claims made by anonymous US intelligence sources about Russian intentions. Just take a look at the March 2024 CNN story linked that states “Russia’s ramp-up is still not enough to meet its needs, US and Western officials say, and Western intelligence officials do not expect Russia to make major gains on the battlefield in the short term.” The most recent claim by the German Defense Minister is that Russia is putting most of its production into warehouses, apparently in preparation for an invasion of NATO territory. Or so he speculates. Essentially all of this is just so much noise. “Blood and Iron” will have to determine the outcome. Right now it is mostly Ukrainian blood and Russian iron. And NATO is unlikely to be able to change that, so they are working on perceptions instead.

A School Principal Was Framed With an AI-Generated Rant

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A former high school athletic director was arrested Thursday morning,” reports CBS News, “after allegedly using artificial intelligence to impersonate the school principal in a recording…”
One-time Pikesville High School employee Dazhon Darien is facing charges that include theft, stalking, disruption of school operations and retaliation against a witness. Investigators determined he faked principal Eric Eiswert’s voice and circulated the audio on social media in January. Darien’s nickname, DJ, was among the names mentioned in the audio clips he allegedly faked, according to the Baltimore County State’s Attorney’s Office.

Baltimore County detectives say Darien created the recording as retaliation against Eiswert, who had launched an investigation into the potential mishandling of school funds, Baltimore County Police Chief Robert McCullough said on Thursday. Eiswert’s voice, which police and AI experts believe was simulated, made disparaging comments toward Black students and the surrounding Jewish community. The audio was widely circulated on social media.
The article notes that after the faked recording circulated on social media the principal “was temporarily removed from the school, and waves of hate-filled messages circulated on social media, while the school received numerous phone calls.”

The suspect had actually used the school’s network multiple times to perform online searches for OpenAI tools, “which police linked to paid OpenAI accounts.”

I’m sorry Dave, I can’t not duplicate that story

By RightwingNutjob • Score: 3 Thread

Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer, do....

Source?

By slack_justyb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

circulated the audio on social media

People, please, I’m fucking begging you, stop eating the whole fucking ham on anything and literally EVERYTHING you read, see, and hear on social media.

The article notes that after the faked recording circulated on social media the principal “was temporarily removed from the school, and waves of hate-filled messages circulated on social media, while the school received numerous phone calls.”

We’re fucking doomed this election cycle and every single one thereafter. Social media is a goddamn blight. It isn’t so much the being able to post shit randomly, it’s the being able to post shit randomly, and then some fucking algorithm that can get it into the face of a million more people if it’ll get the hate boner going. It the fact that we’ve got software that’s been trained to prioritize eyeballs among all other things, no verify, no need to have history, and people defend this software as “well the public has to learn”. If we have bad software, we don’t change the fucking people, we change the goddamn software. How the hell did anyone forget this?! If you open a one-day account that has zero backing information, you too can have your shit spread to ten percent of the entire planet if you just satisfy our money, er, advertising, er, popularity algorithm. There is zero justification for this outside of it’s making someone some cash.

I don’t mind online forums, but if a forum has the ability to dump the worst of the worst (because that’s popular at this moment) onto the default thing that millions of people who might not have even subscribed to that topic see. THAT IS A PROBLEM. When the software is picking what I should see, that’s the big problem. And if I have to click “I’m not interested in this” 500 times because “the algorithm” that’s not the person, that’s the software. I remember that when we had popups, we didn’t go “oh you should just not go there or you should just get better at dismissing popups”, we fucking made a popup blocker.

That’s the massive problem of social media versus something like online forums. Online forums you get what you get. Social media is filling your feed with anything that will appeal to people who want to spend at most five seconds on something. So it’s obvious, quality is NOT the priority. So the fact that so many people will take something that so downplays actual quality as something to attempt to ruin a person’s career over it with literally a single source. BUT All that said, I’m not going to downplay it. It’s 50-50 on these fucking people who ate this shit at face value and the social media networks that ensured this bullshit got in front of as many eyes as possible.

Boeing Accused of Retaliating Against Two Engineers in 2022

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Reuters reports that America’s Federal Aviation Administration “is investigating a union’s claims that Boeing retaliated against two employees who in 2022 insisted the planemaker re-evaluate prior engineering work on 777 and 787 jets.”

The employees’ union “said the two unidentified engineers were representatives of the FAA, which delegates some of its oversight authority and certification process to Boeing workers.”
The FAA noted on Tuesday that in 2022 it boosted oversight of planemakers by protecting aviation industry employees who perform agency functions from interference by their employers. A December 2021 Senate report found “FAA’s certification process suffers from undue pressure on line engineers and production staff.”

“Boeing can tell Congress and the media all it wants about how retaliation is strictly prohibited,” said SPEEA Director of Strategic Development Rich Plunkett. “But our union is fighting retaliation cases on a regular basis, and, in this specific case, Boeing is trying to hide information that would shed light on what happened....”

Last week, Boeing quality engineer whistleblower Sam Salehpour, who raised questions about Boeing widebody jets, told senators he was told to “shut up” when he flagged safety concerns. He has said he was removed from the 787 program and transferred to the 777 jet due to his questions.
Boeing has “zero tolerance for retaliation,” according a statement quoted by Reuters, in which the company says they “encourage our employees to speak up when they see an issue. After an extensive review of documentation and interviewing more than a dozen witnesses, our investigators found no evidence of retaliation or interference. We have determined the allegations are unsubstantiated.”

The union’s version of the story? “After nearly six months of debate, the two engineers, with backing from the FAA, prevailed. Boeing re-did the required analysis.”
The two engineers were still Boeing employees, however, and Boeing management was not pleased. When they came up for their next performance reviews, the two engineers received identical negative evaluations… Even after the manager of the two engineers admitted that he had rated them both poorly at the request of the 777 and 787 managers who had been forced to resubmit their work, Boeing refused to change the engineers’ performance evaluations.

At this point, one of the engineers left in disgust; the other filed a formal “Speak Up” complaint with Boeing.

Plausible

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
As a company that morphed from an Airplane manufacturer to a company run by MBAs and Bean counters, and prime focus was only on servicing the stakeholders, and the planes and Engineers were a nuisance that got in the way of the next quarter’s profit, retaliation sounds exceptionally plausible, after all, the planes and engineers are merely the nuisance that gets in the way of the real purpose of the company now. That sounds sarcastic, but is true. How dare those lowlife engineers anyhow?

Some of the upper admin is a cult

By slack_justyb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Boeing’s upper echelons are full out cult completely divorced of anything on the ground. Retaliation isn’t just in the wheel house, it is the goddamn cornerstone of ensuring profits above all else.

Boeing has “zero tolerance for retaliation,” according a statement quoted by Reuters

And the thing is that most of these cult boys see retaliation as some black and white concept, as unless I fucking came down there and actually slit your throat, I didn’t actually retaliate. None of them understanding that they seed a cult of personalty that encourages people “no matter what you do, DO NOT HURT OUR PROFITS!” and via that mentality they enact all kinds of retaliation to anyone who disrupts the dollar.

After an extensive review of documentation and interviewing more than a dozen witnesses, our investigators found no evidence of retaliation or interference. We have determined the allegations are unsubstantiated.

Yes, yes, we know. You investigated yourselves and found nothing wrong. I don’t think you can cult harder than that.

I hope the US government takes these shitheads to task. But in the end the MBAs, the PHBs, and the board of fuckwits will all get off scot-free because so long as you’re a captain of capitalism, you can just do whatever the fuck you want and we’ll just ask you nicely to please stop.

Fuck Boeing’s top ranks, they’ve taken a company committed to quality and safety, and turned it into a profit at all costs shit hole that’s become the defining quality of the United States various enterprises here of late. The enshitification continues

Re:Some of the upper admin is a cult

By sinij • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Boeing has “zero tolerance for retaliation,” according a statement quoted by Reuters

This is like Harvey Weinstein having zero tolerance policy against sexual harassment.

The FAA will have blood on its hands

By NewtonsLaw • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Where has the FAA been in all this?

Their attitude to Boeing seems to have been “Hey, we’ve got far too much coffee and donuts to get through here, you guys just certify your own planes”

The FAA has also spent an inordinate amount of time, money and resource regulating the recreational drone community when it always has been and remains the safest branch of aviation *ever*. To this date, not one person, anywhere on the planet has ever died as the result of the recreational use of multirotor drones — yet, as Boeings fall apart over our heads and disaster looms as a result of ATC failures, the FAA’s response is to have #DroneSafetyDay on April 27th.

What do I mean about ATC failures?

Watch this YouTube video from Juan Browne who is a seasoned airline pilot flying for a US airline. at 20:05 in the video he clearly states:

“at this rate of mistake making on behalf of ATC here in the domestic side of the US flying a terrible tragic accident is inevitable”

When a highly respected and experienced airline pilot issues a warning like that and backs it up with irrefutable evidence, the FAA should be dropping everything and fixing this problem.

Yet what are the FAA doing? #DroneSafetyDay — trying to improve the safest form of aviation we’ve ever had whilst seemingly ignoring the real problems that have already claimed hundreds of lives and threaten to claim hundreds more.

Someone needs to be fired over this.

Re:The FAA will have blood on its hands

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Where was the FAA? No surprise Trump was fucking it up. https://nffe.org/nffe_news/tru…

$5.6 Million in Refunds Sent to Ring Customers, Settling Unauthorized Access and Privacy Violations

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
America’s Federal Trade Commission “is sending more than $5.6 million in refunds to consumers,” reports the Associated Press, “as part of a settlement with Amazon-owned Ring, which was charged with failing to protect private video footage from outside access.”
In a 2023 complaint, the FTC accused the doorbell camera and home security provider of allowing its employees and contractors to access customers’ private videos. Ring allegedly used such footage to train algorithms without consent, among other purposes. Ring was also charged with failing to implement key security protections, which enabled hackers to take control of customers’ accounts, cameras and videos. This led to “egregious violations of users’ privacy,” the FTC noted.

The resulting settlement required Ring to delete content that was found to be unlawfully obtained, establish stronger security protections and pay a hefty fine. The FTC says that it’s now using much of that money to refund eligible Ring customers.
According to their announcement Tuesday, the FTC is now sending 117,044 PayPal payments to affected consumers…

The ‘Ceph’ Community Now Stores 1,000 Petabytes in Its Open Source Storage Solution

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
1,000 petabytes.
A million terabytes.
One quintillion bytes (or 1,000,000,000,000,000,000).

That’s the amount of storage reported by users of the Ceph storage solution (across more than 3,000 Ceph clusters).

The Ceph Foundation is a “directed fund” of the Linux Foundation, providing a neutral home for Ceph, “the most popular open source storage solution for modern data storage challenges” (offering an architecture that’s “highly scalable, resilient, and flexible”). It’s a software-defined storage platform, providing object storage, block storage, and file storage built on a common distributed cluster foundation.

And Friday they announced the release of Ceph Squid, “which comes with several performance and space efficiency features along with enhanced protocol support.”
Ceph has solidified its position as the cornerstone of open source data storage. The release of Ceph Squid represents a significant milestone toward providing scalable, reliable, and flexible storage solutions that meet the ever-evolving demands of digital data storage.

Features of Ceph Squid include improvements to BlueStore [a storage back end specifically designed for managing data on disk for Ceph Object Storage Daemon workloads] to reduce latency and CPU requirements for snapshot intensive workloads. BlueStore now uses RocksDB compression by default for increased average performance and reduced space usage. [And the next-generation Crimson OSD also has improvements in stability and read performance, and “now supports scrub, partial recovery and osdmap trimming.”]

Ceph continues to drive the future of storage, and welcomes developers, partners, and technology enthusiasts to get involved.
Ceph Squid also brings enhancements for the CRUSH algorithm [which computes storage locations] to support more flexible and cost effective erasure coding configurations.

Excited For Ceph

By organgtool • Score: 3 Thread
A colleague and I are in the process of building a Proxmox cluster which uses Ceph to host all of our VMs. We’ve never built something like this from the ground up but we’re both very excited by the many advantages these technologies provide over running on bare metal. The performance of our prototypes have been pretty impressive and we can’t wait to have the full-scale system up and running. I’ll have to see if we should wait to upgrade to the new version of Ceph before continuing the deployment.

Two Lifeforms Merge Into One Organism For First Time In a Billion Years

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“For the first time in at least a billion years, two lifeforms have merged into a single organism,” reports the Independent:
The process, called primary endosymbiosis, has only happened twice in the history of the Earth, with the first time giving rise to all complex life as we know it through mitochondria. The second time that it happened saw the emergence of plants. Now, an international team of scientists have observed the evolutionary event happening between a species of algae commonly found in the ocean and a bacterium…

The process involves the algae engulfing the bacterium and providing it with nutrients, energy and protection in return for functions that it could not previously perform — in this instance, the ability to “fix” nitrogen from the air. The algae then incorporates the bacterium as an internal organ called an organelle, which becomes vital to the host’s ability to function.

The researchers from the U.S. and Japan who made the discovery said it will offer new insights into the process of evolution, while also holding the potential to fundamentally change agriculture. “This system is a new perspective on nitrogen fixation, and it might provide clues into how such an organelle could be engineered into crop plants,” said Dr Coale.
Two papers detailing the research were published in the scientific journals Science and Cell.

Thanks to Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the news.

Re:Reproduction?

By mbkennel • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The nitrogen fixing organelle is the very subject of the OP’s article.

> These independent lines of evidence leave little doubt that UCYN-A has surpassed the role of a symbiont. And while mitochondria and chloroplasts evolved billions of years ago, the nitroplast appears to have evolved about 100 million years ago, providing scientists with a new, more recent perspective on organellogenesis.

The new evidence is not that this symbiosis is new, but that it’s functionally an early stage organelle dependent on some proteins from the host and in the process of merging.

The details of the paper say it happened 91 MY ago

By mtm10 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The actual story is that scientists just recently realized the likelyhood that the nitrogen fixing ability of certain bacteria was due to a merger of one cell into another, 91 million years ago. And they hint, contrary to the headline (Only the third time!), that the nitrogen fixing capability of certain marine plankton and terrestrial plants (which host nitrogen fixing bacteria in specialized organs) may well be additional “Life form mergers.”

Inspector Clouseau would be dismayed at how long this investigation required… smile

Ref:

Accordingly, not only did the B. bigelowii/UCYN-A symbiosis originate ca. 91 mya, i.e., in the late Cretaceous, but also the origin of other marine (e.g., marine planktonic diatomdiazotroph associations) and non-marine (e.g., plants with specialized root organs [nodules] where N2-fixing bacteria are hosted) N2-fixing symbioses have been dated to the Cretaceous period.

Re:First time?

By MightyMartian • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Well, we all have retroviral genes in our genomes; so in one way there certainly has been “mergings”, at least at the genetic level. But the nature of the two organelles being referred to; mitochondria and chloroplasts, in indeed different. Mitochondria originated as free-living Alphaproteobacteria that could, apparently, produce ATP through oxidization. Chloroplasts are the descendants of cyanobacteria, who could produce ATP from photosynthesis.

Both mitochondria and chloroplasts weren’t merely enveloped by more primitive eukaryotic cells, they’re division and reproduction is timed to that of the host cell, so that when the host cell divides, so do to these organelles. Additionally, both mitochondria and chloroplasts have lost a lot of genes over the 1.5 to 2 billion years that they have been incorporated into eukaryotic cell lines. Another critical aspect of both these types of organelles is that their genomes are not merely honed down to what look like the essentials for producing energy, but that those genomes are very conserved even as compared to the host cells.

If this is the case, even it’s early in the evolution of this endosymbiotic relationship, it is a significant discovery.

Re:The details of the paper say it happened 91 MY

By davide marney • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Mod parent up.

It’s pretty hard to popularize science. You have to simplify things down far enough to be understood by readers without any formal background, but not leave out anything important that would leave the wrong impression. One presumes your typical reader of the Independent newspaper in the UK would read this article and just think, “oh, very well, carry on”.

But it’s great to have so many eyes on everything now so people can fill in the context for us. This is a truly net positive of having an Internet. Social media isn’t all bad.

I’m glad to see a “hard” science news post on Slashdot. There have been so many science posts here in the past few years that are just junk, in my opinion. Lots of science-y and scientism stuff, all mixed in with politics and talking points. This is supposed to be a place where engineers and technical people come to talk. We want the facts, not the spin.

Re:Meh.

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I do this all the time with the wife.

Me too - Your wife is pretty awesome and a lot of fun.

Intel’s Stock Drops 9%. Are They Struggling to Remain Relevant?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Intel used to dominate the U.S. chip industry,” writes CNBC. But now “it’s struggling to stay relevant.”
Intel’s long-awaited turnaround looks farther away than ever after the company reported dismal first-quarter earnings. Investors pushed the shares down 9% on Friday to their lowest level of the year. Although Intel’s revenue is no longer shrinking and the company remains the biggest maker of processors that power PCs and laptops, sales in the first quarter trailed estimates. Intel also gave a soft forecast for the second quarter, suggesting weak demand… Intel is the worst-performing tech stock in the S&P 500 this year, down 37%.

Meanwhile, the two best-performing stocks in the index are chipmaker Nvidia and Super Micro Computer, which has been boosted by surging demand for Nvidia-based artificial intelligence servers. Intel, long the most valuable U.S. chipmaker, is now one-sixteenth the size of Nvidia by market cap. It’s also smaller than Qualcomm, Broadcom, Texas Instruments, and AMD. For decades, it was the largest semiconductor company in the world by sales, but suffered seven straight quarters of revenue declines recently, and was passed by Nvidia last year.
Intel’s problems “are decades in the making,” according to CNBC, suggesting that one turning point was Apple’s decision not to use Intel’s chips in its iPhone. Now nearly every smartphone built uses Arm chips built by Apple and Qualcomm, while Apple’s huge orders for TSMC chips “provided the cash to annually upgrade the manufacturing equipment at TSMC, which eventually surpassed Intel.”
Around 2017, mobile chips from Apple and Qualcomm started adding AI parts to their chips called neural processing units, another advancement over Intel’s PC processors. The first Intel-based laptop with an NPU shipped late last year.

Intel has since lost share in its core PC chip business to chips that grew out of the mobile revolution… Apple stopped using Intel in its PCs in 2020. Macs now use Arm-based chips, and some of the first mainstream Windows laptops with Arm-based chips are coming out later this year. Low-cost laptops running Google ChromeOS are increasingly using Arm, too…

AMD made over 20% of server CPUs sold in 2022, and shipments grew 62% that year, according to an estimate from Counterpoint Research last year. AMD surpassed Intel’s market cap the same year.

80% of the market still

By caseih • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Even in the summary quote the author admits that Intel sold 80% of the server CPUs to AMD’s 20%. It’s not the 99% that they once had but it’s still the vast majority of servers out there. Sure the trend is towards increased competition from AMD and even ARM. But Intel is still a profitable company that has the majority market share. Seems pretty relevant.

Stock prices are kind of silly. Oh no the price dropped 9%! The company is done! One wonders if the article writer has some stock he shorted and wants to push it down some more with some breathy copy.

Netcraft unavailable for comment

By wild_berry • Score: 4, Funny Thread

I don’t know who this CNBC are, I’d be looking to Netcraft to confirm whether Intel are dying.

Adios Intel

By mcnster • Score: 3 Thread

With ~20 billion transistors on an i9 it would be impossible for one person or even a team of people to comprehend all the logic involved and how it interacts with everything else, given that it would take a human 138 years to count to only one (1) billion. Not to mention Intel’s somewhat dodgy practice (since 2013) of putting an MEI (ARC) co-processor on the die with an encrypted code base that runs and has access to the entire bus (out of band) even when the box is connected to AC but powered off. Not to mention that Intel will sue you into the stone age if one tries to replicate their instruction set (think NEC V-20 in the 80’s). Not to mention that it takes roughtly 3,500 pages of pdf to describe the operation of today’s chip at only the software level. Not to mention that the instruction set proper has transmogrified into a living hell of features layered upon features since the 8086.

I’m putting my money on RISC-V-64. Unencumbered IP. Simple. Well-documented. Understandable by a mere mortal guru. Implementable by anyone with a FPGA and the nerve to try. And high-performance, professionally designed RISC-V ASICs will emerge.


Make it as simpler as possible. But not simpler. (Albert Einstein)

Re:80% of the market still

By dgatwood • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The question was “are they struggling to remain relevant,” and the answer to that is a resounding no. Obviously future fortunes can change.

Sure. But in the markets ARM is playing, Intel has never played (whether they wanted to or not). Except for what Apple is doing, ARM has nothing to compete with Intel and AMD in the general-purpose computing market.

Sure they do. Ampere Altra Max has 128 cores of ARM goodness. The benchmarks show it mostly running about half the speed of recent AMD and Intel offerings, and actually beating the Xeon in some tests, but using significantly less power to do it (resulting in better performance per watt).

And with more and more server workloads depending on outboard GPUs and TPUs for most of the interesting workload, raw server CPU performance is likely to take a back seat to power consumption anyway at some point.

Intel has a fab…

By ctilsie242 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The thing that keeps Intel relevant is the fact that they have fabs, and moving to a 1.8 nm process node later this year. That, and the US DoD choosing them for some large projects.

There are many companies designing CPUs, but even if one has something truly awe-inspiring on their Palladium simulator [1], none of that matters until it hits silicon, and there are very few companies that can do that. There are also different process nodes. Running MCUs that do a small task don’t need sub-nanometer process nodes… they need process nodes around 20nm before voodoo has to be done to maximize out yield and cost of high volume fabbing. However, CPUs, and matrix-multiplying processors need to be on the best process node available. For the most part, there is pretty much TSMC, Intel, Samsung, and Micron.

Next to Intel having DoD contracts, Intel also has been working on making their process nodes more ARM and RISC-V friendly. Even with that, Intel also mentioned having X86S, a simplified amd64 architecture. Not sure how it compares to ARM or RISC-V, but it seems to be an advance on that front.

Overall, I don’t think Intel is going anywhere. Worst case, if something happens and they completely implode, the government will pick them up as they did with GM and Chrysler because having the latest fab technology is important to national security.

[1]: Nothing like the joy of “first light” when a CPU in the simulator manages to boot the Linux kernel. It means that even though tape out is far away because there is a ton of tweaking before first silicon, the core stuff works.

A Windows Vulnerability Reported by the NSA Was Exploited To Install Russian Malware

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Kremlin-backed hackers have been exploiting a critical Microsoft vulnerability for four years,” Ars Technica reported this week, “in attacks that targeted a vast array of organizations with a previously undocumented tool, the software maker disclosed Monday.

“When Microsoft patched the vulnerability in October 2022 — at least two years after it came under attack by the Russian hackers — the company made no mention that it was under active exploitation.”
As of publication, the company’s advisory still made no mention of the in-the-wild targeting. Windows users frequently prioritize the installation of patches based on whether a vulnerability is likely to be exploited in real-world attacks.

Exploiting CVE-2022-38028, as the vulnerability is tracked, allows attackers to gain system privileges, the highest available in Windows, when combined with a separate exploit. Exploiting the flaw, which carries a 7.8 severity rating out of a possible 10, requires low existing privileges and little complexity. It resides in the Windows print spooler, a printer-management component that has harbored previous critical zero-days. Microsoft said at the time that it learned of the vulnerability from the US National Security Agency… Since as early as April 2019, Forest Blizzard has been exploiting CVE-2022-38028 in attacks that, once system privileges are acquired, use a previously undocumented tool that Microsoft calls GooseEgg. The post-exploitation malware elevates privileges within a compromised system and goes on to provide a simple interface for installing additional pieces of malware that also run with system privileges. This additional malware, which includes credential stealers and tools for moving laterally through a compromised network, can be customized for each target.

“While a simple launcher application, GooseEgg is capable of spawning other applications specified at the command line with elevated permissions, allowing threat actors to support any follow-on objectives such as remote code execution, installing a backdoor, and moving laterally through compromised networks,” Microsoft officials wrote.
Thanks to Slashdot reader echo123 for sharing the news.

Shame on Microsoft

By FudRucker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It is this sort of neglect in patching a known and exploited vulnerability and not warning customers that makes windows a laughable operating system, and Microsoft a laughing-stock in software companies, shame on you Microsoft!!!

I still haven’t been able to install…

By PubJeezy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I still haven’t been able to install the 2024-01 Security Update. It’s been several months and this update just doesn’t seem to work. And my machine doesn’t seem like an isolated incident. This update doesn’t seem to be working for most people

As a security update is was designed to plug a few security holes and likely came with documentation of some sort. This means that microsoft sent out a memo with a list of vulnerabilities in windows 10 and then served an update THAT ISNT ABLE TO PATCH THOSE VULNERABILITIES.

Microsoft is a data theft cartel. Windows is spyware. Tech has broken bad and let the mask slip. This is pure villainy.

Possible criminal negligence?

By jd • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

If a manufacturer knows that a system has a specific defect that makes it dangerous to use in certain contexts, it is usually obliged by law to report those circumstances. The license agreement is not necessarily considered legally binding or protective where there is a case of wilful neglect. Deliberate actions are not treated the same as lack of awareness or even negligence. But even negligence may be treated unsympathetically by the courts, no matter what customers sign up to.

Given that this defect could have left exposed critical infrastructure, banks, and businesses whose work is in the national interest, one might even be able to argue a case that this gave succour to hostile powers.

The most probable outcome is nothing happening. Companies are risk-averse and Microsoft has expensive lawyers. But a class action suit for wilful endangerment isn’t wholly impossible, and I could see the DOJ investigating whether laws were broken, but only after the election.

Re:I still haven’t been able to install…

By WaffleMonster • Score: 4, Informative Thread

While the issue with the recovery partition running out of space and preventing application of the patch is indeed annoying, I suspect the “average” user isn’t going to be running on such a small hard drive that it’s an issue. The only place I have seen it is on small (disk) sized virtual machine images. The average user is unlikely to be running Windows as a VM or on a machine that has had the OS upgraded many times (and has an ancient, small recovery partition).

For the GP, what size of hard disk (virtual or otherwise) do you have Windows on? I am curious to know if this occurs on “typically” sized Windows installs.

The problem isn’t hard drive space it’s that the recovery partition created by **DEFAULT** by Microsoft was no longer big enough. To fix you have to mount the partition (mountvol z: /s) and delete about 20 megs of useless files, from what I remember MS recommended one of the font folders. You can’t just repartition because by default the C drive is the very next and there is no such thing as shrink left using Microsoft tools. Otherwise you have to use GPartd or some such.

Absolutely bonkers that Microsoft isn’t properly addressing this problem. It’s not like people intentionally made the recovery partition too small or don’t have a big enough disk space. This is 100% Microsoft’s fault.

Re:Shame on Microsoft

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The “shame on you” phase is long, long over for Microsoft. Now it is “shame on me for using that crap”…

EyeEm Will License Users’ Photos To Train AI If They Don’t Delete Them

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Sarah Perez reports via TechCrunch:
EyeEm, the Berlin-based photo-sharing community that exited last year to Spanish company Freepik after going bankrupt, is now licensing its users’ photos to train AI models. Earlier this month, the company informed users via email that it was adding a new clause to its Terms & Conditions that would grant it the rights to upload users’ content to “train, develop, and improve software, algorithms, and machine-learning models.” Users were given 30 days to opt out by removing all their content from EyeEm’s platform. Otherwise, they were consenting to this use case for their work.

At the time of its 2023 acquisition, EyeEm’s photo library included 160 million images and nearly 150,000 users. The company said it would merge its community with Freepik’s over time. Despite its decline, almost 30,000 people are still downloading it each month, according to data from Appfigures. Once thought of as a possible challenger to Instagram — or at least “Europe’s Instagram” — EyeEm had dwindled to a staff of three before selling to Freepik, TechCrunch’s Ingrid Lunden previously reported. Joaquin Cuenca Abela, CEO of Freepik, hinted at the company’s possible plans for EyeEm, saying it would explore how to bring more AI into the equation for creators on the platform. As it turns out, that meant selling their work to train AI models. […]

Of note, the notice says that these deletions from EyeEm market and partner platforms could take up to 180 days. Yes, that’s right: Requested deletions take up to 180 days but users only have 30 days to opt out. That means the only option is manually deleting photos one by one. Worse still, the company adds that: “You hereby acknowledge and agree that your authorization for EyeEm to market and license your Content according to sections 8 and 10 will remain valid until the Content is deleted from EyeEm and all partner platforms within the time frame indicated above. All license agreements entered into before complete deletion and the rights of use granted thereby remain unaffected by the request for deletion or the deletion.” Section 8 is where licensing rights to train AI are detailed. In Section 10, EyeEm informs users they will forgo their right to any payouts for their work if they delete their account — something users may think to do to avoid having their data fed to AI models. Gotcha!

Re:GDPR violation?

By qbast • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It is a violation. As is 180 days to process it - company cannot take more than 30 days to delete data upon request. So I guess this idiocy will get squashed soon

What if the user has died?

By sonamchauhan • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

What if the user dies? Is silence consent to the site’s unilaterally changed T&Cs?

What if a modelling agency does this:?

“Look, so-and-so just died. Quick! Let’s change our T&Cs to grab his AI voice and likeness acting rights for-evah!”

Legislation is needed

By sinij • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Wait until Google, FB and other companies figure out that declaring sham bankruptcy and transferring servers to another numbered company allows them to void all user protections. It won’t be just pictures, it will be your tax returns and private emails used for training AI. Which will in turn be used to manipulate your consumer habits, voting patterns, and even personal relationships.

Not how this works…

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

the company informed users via email that it was adding a new clause to its Terms & Conditions… Users were given 30 days to opt out.

Um, no. You don’t get to redefine contract terms with an “opt out”. They’re letting themselves in for a world of hurt (and court cases) if they do this.

Can’t log in

By garryknight • Score: 3 Thread

I just tried to log in, just in case I’d left some photos on there and got a message telling they can’t log me in and that I should “check my input”. I did. It’s the same email and password it’s been since the start, all those years ago. What *is* going on with this company?!

China Reveals Most Detailed Geological Map of the Moon Ever Created

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shares a report from Nature:
The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has released the highest-resolution geological maps of the Moon yet. The Geologic Atlas of the Lunar Globe, which took more than 100 researchers over a decade to compile, reveals a total of 12,341 craters, 81 basins and 17 rock types, along with other basic geological information about the lunar surface. The maps were made at the unprecedented scale of 1:2,500,000. The CAS also released a book called Map Quadrangles of the Geologic Atlas of the Moon, comprising 30 sector diagrams which together form a visualization of the whole Moon. […] China will use the maps to support its lunar ambitions and Liu says that the maps will be beneficial to other countries as they undertake their own Moon missions. Three spacecraft have launched aiming for the Moon so far this year, and in May, China intends to send a craft to collect rocks from the Moon’s far side.

Re:way cool

By christoban • Score: 5, Informative Thread

If there’s anything useful, you can be sure, it won’t be on those maps.

Re:China dominates the moon now

By gtall • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Ya, because it is sooooo much easier to land something successfully on Mars than it is the moon. Maybe you could tell NASA what it is doing wrong, I’m sure they’d listen to you.

Re:Waiting for a political map

By gtall • Score: 4, Funny Thread

They’ve already claimed Tibet on the grounds that it is nearest to the moon.

Re:way cool

By christoban • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

LOL! No, I mean water or useful caves, that sort of thing. Any helpful features will be left off as to not help us in any way. This is just propaganda to make the CCP look not totally incompetent, pushed by their usual propagandist here on /., AmiMoJo.

Moon is hard. So is Mars [Re:China dominates t…]

By XXongo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Ya, because it is sooooo much easier to land something successfully on Mars than it is the moon. Maybe you could tell NASA what it is doing wrong, I’m sure they’d listen to you.

NASA went with the low-cost approach to landing on Mars (tagged “faster better cheaper”) with the 1998 Mars Polar Lander (MPL) and Deep Space 2 probes, which were built for half the price of the previous Mars missions. They failed. When you go bargain-basement, you take risks. The following Mars missions, MER, Curiosity, Perseverance, took that lesson to heart, and were not “go for the lowest cost regardless of what corners you have to cut.”

With the Commercial Lunar Payload Services landers, twenty-five years later, NASA went back to the idea of prioritizing low cost and took a completely commercial approach, “you bid on it, and we won’t tell you how you design the mission, you just land our payload on the moon.” NASA did this knowing that there were risks, but with the approach that taking risks will, in the long run, reduce price, and they hedged the risks by choosing several different companies to deliver landing services. The first one failed; the second one l(from a different company) anded on the moon but broke a strut and fell over. NASA knew it would be risky, and accepted the risk. Unlike previous failures, this time they did not cancel the program with the first failure.

As an afterward, one of the ways the Mars Polar Lander was cheap was that they built several landers in an assembly line. The second one, Mars Surveyor 2001, was cancelled after MPL failed… but the spacecraft was already finished, and after the failure mechanisms were known, the design flaw was fixed and the spacecraft was flown to Mars as the Phoenix mission. Which worked, and the design was then used again for Insight. If there’s a lesson there, it is that when a low cost mission fails, you can learn from the failure and fix it.

Europe Plans To Build 100-Qubit Quantum Computer By 2026

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report published last week by Physics World:
Researchers at the Dutch quantum institute QuTech in Delft have announced plans to build Europe’s first 100-quantum bit (qubit) quantum computer. When complete in 2026, the device will be made publicly available, providing scientists with a tool for quantum calculations and simulations. The project is funded by the Dutch umbrella organization Quantum Delta NL via the European OpenSuperQPlus initiative, which has 28 partners from 10 countries. Part of the 10-year, 1 billion-euro European Quantum Flagship program, OpenSuperQPlus aims to build a 100-qubit superconducting quantum processor as a stepping stone to an eventual 1000-qubit European quantum computer.

Quantum Delta NL says the 100-qubit quantum computer will be made publicly available via a cloud platform as an extension of the existing platform Quantum Inspire that first came online in 2020. It currently includes a two-qubit processor of spin qubits in silicon, as well as a five-qubit processor based on superconducting qubits. Quantum Inspire is currently focused on training and education but the upgrade to 100 qubits is expected to allow research into quantum computing. Lead researcher from QuTech Leonardo DiCarlo believes the R&D cycle has “come full circle,” where academic research first enabled spin-off companies to grow and now their products are being used to accelerate academic research.

Quantum fusion?

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
At this point, quantum computing will become useful right around the time that we have commercially viable fusion reactors. Just around the corner, only a few years away…forever…

Real or effective qbits?

By gweihir • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

Naa, does not matter. With 100 qbits you can do less than a 40 year old pocket calculator with a slow 4bit CPU.

Re:Quantum fusion?

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Practical fusion is still half a century or more removed. The actual scientists working on it make no other claims. It is just the deranged press that does.

Re:Which approach?

By arglebargle_xiv • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The infusion of government cash is the whole point of the exercise. You don’t actually do anything with these physics experiments except use them to get more money for additional experiments.

Re:Quantum fusion?

By JoshuaZ • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

In the case of both quantum computing and commercial fusion reactors we’re making progress pretty rapidly. A major reason that fusion has been so slow compared to some predictions is that simply put, the amount of funding for it has been well below projections. See https://www.reddit.com/r/energy/comments/5budos/fusion_is_always_50_years_away_for_a_reason/?onetap_auto=true&one_tap=true#lightbox this graph. But the fusion situation is getting better, and rapidly. The triple product, a useful way of measuring how close a fusion reactor is to being self-sustaining has shown major improvement the last few years and it continues to get better https://www.fusionenergybase.com/article/measuring-progress-in-fusion-energy-the-triple-products Better computer modeling of what is happening in reactors, as well as better superconductors have helped a lot. And there’s another large-scale change with fusion reactors which that we’re starting to see a lot more private investment. Now, some of that is clearly due to hype, but a lot of it looks promising, and also helps show that the tech is getting to the point where it has some decent chance. If fusion fails to be commercially viable the most likely way that will happen is that by the time it would be otherwise viable, it will be competing with just really efficient solar and wind which are showing drastic improvements in cost the last few years.

For quantum computers the situation is not as good. But there’s still clear improvements the last few years in at least three major respects. First, there’s been major improvements on quantum error corrections. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_error_correction Due to the inherent noisiness of quantum computers due to stray particles and the like, quantum error correction is really important. But the early error correction algorithms were just not that good. One of the first discovered was Shor’s code which required 9 extra qubits for each logical qubit. But that was replaced with the CSS code which was much more efficient https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSS_code, and subsequent codes are even more efficient or allow one to play with tradeoffs. Second, we’re much better at keeping qubits entangled with many others or for long periods of time. See for example, https://www.newscientist.com/article/2382022-record-breaking-number-of-qubits-entangled-in-a-quantum-computer/ Third, and closely connected to 1 and 2, there are now real demonstrations of CSS and similar approaches on physical qubits. See e.g. discussion here https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=7651.

It does not seem like either of these techs is going to be practical for a few years yet. But there’s clear progress in both and at a rapid rate.

Ring Customers Get $5.6 Million In Refunds In Privacy Settlement

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FTC is issuing more than $5.6 million in refunds to Ring customers as part of a privacy settlement. The Associated Press reports:
In a 2023 complaint, the FTC accused the doorbell camera and home security provider of allowing its employees and contractors to access customers’ private videos. Ring allegedly used such footage to train algorithms without consent, among other purposes. Ring was also charged with failing to implement key security protections, which enabled hackers to take control of customers’ accounts, cameras and videos. This led to “egregious violations of users’ privacy,” the FTC noted.

The resulting settlement required Ring to delete content that was found to be unlawfully obtained, establish stronger security protections and pay a hefty fine. The FTC says that it’s now using much of that money to refund eligible Ring customers. According to a Tuesday notice, the FTC is sending 117,044 PayPal payments to impacted consumers who had certain types of Ring devices — including indoor cameras — during the timeframes that the regulators allege unauthorized access took place. Eligible customers will need to redeem these payments within 30 days, according to the FTC — which added that consumers can contact this case’s refund administrator, Rust Consulting, or visit the FTC’s FAQ page on refunds for more information about the process.

PayPal? WTF?

By Petersko • Score: 5, Funny Thread

How did they land that gig?

https://www.ftc.gov/enforcemen…

According to their FAQ:

“If you are requesting a check instead of a PayPal payment, it will be at least 45 days from the initial payment date before we can issue the check. We must wait for PayPal to return the payment before we can begin processing check reissues.”

It’s not clear to me… is it a blind drop to PayPal using your email address, under the assumption you “must” have a PayPal account? If so, I wonder if the delay puts you in the “second tier” of payments, which may or may not happen depending on the balance of the refund pool.

Whose dick did PayPal have to suck to land this gig?

$5.60 per subscriber

By Hey_Jude_Jesus • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
and millions for the attorneys. The American justice system at work

$47

By markdavis • Score: 3 Thread

>“is sending 117,044 PayPal payments”

So that is $47.86 per impacted customer, and sent automatically. Hmm. At least it is not like those ridiculous class-action suits where you have to fill out a bunch of forms, MAIL it in, wait several months or years, and then get a whopping $2 or $5 or something stupid for all that effort.

Wait…

By jddj • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

What about the people the cameras recorded? Innocent folks who just walked up to the door? Trick or treating minors you recorded without permission? The pizza guy and the mailman?

Aren’t THEY the ones whose privacy was actually invaded? When do they get paid?

Xbox Console Sales Are Tanking As Microsoft Brings Games To PS5

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
In its third-quarter earnings call on Thursday, Microsoft reported a 30% drop in Xbox console sales, after reporting a 30% drop last April. “It blamed the nosedive on a ‘lower volume of consoles sold’ during the start of 2024,” reports Kotaku. From the report:
In February, Grand Theft Auto VI parent company Take-Two claimed in a presentation to investors that there were roughly 77 million “gen 9” consoles in people’s homes. It didn’t take fans long to do the math and speculate that Microsoft had only sold around 25 million Xbox Series X/S consoles to-date. That puts it ahead of the GameCube but behind the Nintendo 64, at least for now. Given the results this quarter as well, it doesn’t seem like Game Pass and Starfield have moved the needle much. Maybe that will change once Call of Duty, which Microsoft acquired last fall along with the rest of Activision Blizzard, finally makes its way to Game Pass. Diablo IV only just arrived on the Netflix-like subscription platform this month. But given the fact that the fate of Xbox Series X/S appears to be locked in at this point, it’s easy to see why Microsoft is looking at other places it can put its games.

Sea of Thieves, the last of four games in this initial volley to come to PS5, dominated the PlayStation Store’s top sellers list last week on pre-orders alone. CEO Satya Nadella specifically called this out during a call with investors, noting that Microsoft had more games in the top 25 best sellers on PS5 than any other publisher. “We are committed to meeting players where they are by bringing great games to more people on more devices,” he said. If players there continue to flock to the live-service pirate sim, it’s not hard to imagine Microsoft bringing another batch of its first-party exclusives to the rival platform. Whether that means more recent blockbusters like Starfield or the upcoming Indiana Jones game will someday make the journey remains to be seen.

The fallout from Halo Infinite continues

By stevenm86 • Score: 3 Thread
Microsoft had an epiphany. They realized they needed to crap out a new Halo game, without it necessarily needing to be *good* - the name/lore of the franchise alone would carry it forward. Turns out that isn’t necessarily the case (surprise!). And although they may have taken some steps to fix the mess, the fixes came years too late and the damage had been done. This is partly the result of corporate types trying to run a game studio, which comes with its own baggage, not the least of which is insisting that a cutting-edge engine be written and maintained by contractors who are employed 18 months at a time.

Re:The fallout from Halo Infinite continues

By Can’tNot • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I don’t think this is new. I’m speaking only for myself here, but I went through all of the games that I was interested in getting for the Xbox 360 / PS 3 generation and found that very few of those were Xbox exclusives. I think it’s mostly just about the fact that the Japanese developers have rejected Microsoft, and outside of a few blockbuster titles they’re the primary console developers. The better western devs tend to be more on PC.

Just to emphasize: I’m not talking about the big titles, I’m talking about the smaller ones. The Katamaris and the Zack and Wikis and the Endless Oceans, etc. The little charming games which you need to fill out your catalogue.

Obviously, this is skewed by my own preferences. I don’t care about FIFA or Call of Duty or Halo. But Microsoft’s catalogue really does seem to be lacking in every generation.

Re:Is Cloud Streaming killing console sales?

By DrMrLordX • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Cloud gaming ranges from mediocre to awful. Maybe some people can stand it but if you can detect extra input lag in the 40-100ms range, it’s pretty wretched. Stadia should have served as a warning to everyone of how bad the input lag can get when you try to stream the entire game over the Internet.

Re:Is Cloud Streaming killing console sales?

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

40-100ms would be nice. I have gigabit fiber direct to my house and it’s not even playable then. Anything requiring fast action is out. Think 200+ ms. I’ve tried Geforce Now, Stadia, and Luna, and they’re all just as bad even with a “Premium” subscription. I can’t see how the product is even viable. It’s definitely telling that Google realized this and got out early.

I think what they might do, though, is design games around this latency, hiding its poor performance like how they hide the poor accuracy of controller thumbsticks. It’s possible there’s a killer app lurking somewhere in there, maybe in the MMO space, marketed to kids who can’t afford a console.