Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Meta and YouTube Found Negligent in Landmark Social Media Addiction Case
  2. Meta Loses Trial After Arguing Child Exploitation Was ‘Inevitable’
  3. AI Economy Is a ‘Ponzi Scheme,’ Says AI Doc Director
  4. China Is Mass-Producing Hypersonic Missiles For $99,000
  5. Chandra Resolves Why Black Holes Hit the Brakes On Growth
  6. NASA Halts Work On Gateway To Develop a Lunar Base
  7. Hong Kong Police Can Demand Passwords Under New National Security Rules
  8. Wine 11 Rewrites How Linux Runs Windows Games At the Kernel Level
  9. Google’s Android Automotive Is Moving From the Dashboard To the ‘Brain’ of the Car
  10. OpenAI Discontinues Sora Video Platform App
  11. Arm Unveils New AGI CPU With Meta As Debut Customer
  12. Anthropic’s Claude Can Now Use Your Computer To Finish Tasks
  13. Self-Propagating Malware Poisons Open Source Software, Wipes Iran-Based Machines
  14. Epic Games To Cut More Than 1,000 Jobs As Fortnite Usage Falls
  15. FCC Bans Imports of New Foreign-Made Routers, Citing Security Concerns

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Meta and YouTube Found Negligent in Landmark Social Media Addiction Case

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A jury found Meta and YouTube negligent in a landmark social media addiction case, ruling that addictive design features such as infinite scroll and algorithmic recommendations harmed a young user and contributed to her mental health distress. The verdict awards $3 million in compensatory damages so far and could pave the way for more lawsuits seeking financial penalties and product changes across the social media industry. “Meta is responsible for 70 percent of that cost and YouTube for the remainder,” notes The New York Times. “TikTok and Snap both settled with the plaintiff for undisclosed terms before the trial started.” From the report:
The bellwether case, which was brought by a now 20-year-old woman identified as K.G.M., had accused social media companies of creating products as addictive as cigarettes or digital casinos. K.G.M. sued Meta, which owns Instagram and Facebook, and Google’s YouTube over features like infinite scroll and algorithmic recommendations that she claimed led to anxiety and depression.

The jury of seven women and five men will deliberate further to decide what further punitive damages the companies should pay for malice or fraud. The verdict in K.G.M.‘s case — one of thousands of lawsuits filed by teenagers, school districts and state attorneys general against Meta, YouTube, TikTok and Snap, which owns Snapchat — was a major win for the plaintiffs. The finding validates a novel legal theory that social media sites or apps can cause personal injury. It is likely to factor into similar cases expected to go to trial this year, which could expose the internet giants to further financial damages and force changes to their products.
The verdict also comes on the heels of a New Mexico jury ruling that found Meta liable for violating state law by failing to protect users of its apps from child predators.

Meta Loses Trial After Arguing Child Exploitation Was ‘Inevitable’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta lost a child safety trial in New Mexico after a court found that its platforms failed to adequately protect children from exploitation and misled parents about app safety. According to Ars Technica, the jury on Tuesday “deliberated for only one day before agreeing that Meta should pay $375 million in civil damages…” While the jury declined to impose the maximum penalty New Mexico sought, which could have cost the company $2.2 billion, Meta may still face additional financial penalties and could be forced to make changes to its apps. From the report:
The trial followed a 2023 lawsuit filed by New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez after The Guardian published a two-year investigation exposing child sex trafficking markets on Facebook and Instagram. Torrez’s office then conducted an undercover investigation codenamed “Operation MetaPhile,” in which officers posed as children on Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The jury heard that these fake profiles were “simply inundated with images and targeted solicitations” from child abusers, Torrez told CNBC in 2024. Ultimately, three men were arrested amid the sting for attempting to use Meta’s social networks to prey on children. At trial, Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram chief Adam Mosseri testified that “harms to children, such as sexual exploitation and detriments to mental health, were inevitable on the company’s platforms due to their vast user bases,” The Guardian reported. Internal messages and documents, as well as testimony from child safety experts within and outside the company, showed that Meta repeatedly ignored warnings and failed to fix platforms to protect kids, New Mexico’s AG successfully argued.

Perhaps most troubling to the jury, law enforcement and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children also testified that Meta’s reporting of crimes to children on its apps — including child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) — was “deficient,” The Guardian reported. Rather than make it easy to trace harms on its platforms, the jury learned from frustrated cops that Meta “generated high volumes of ‘junk’ reports by overly relying on AI to moderate its platforms.” This made its reporting “useless” and “meant crimes could not be investigated,” The Guardian reported.

Celebrating the win as a “historic victory,” Torrez told CNBC that families had previously paid the price for “Meta’s choice to put profits over kids’ safety.” “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” Torrez said. “Today the jury joined families, educators, and child safety experts in saying enough is enough.”
Meta said the company plans to appeal the verdict. “We respectfully disagree with the verdict and will appeal,” Meta’s spokesperson said. “We work hard to keep people safe on our platforms and are clear about the challenges of identifying and removing bad actors or harmful content. We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously, and we remain confident in our record of protecting teens online.”

Exploitation of children is inevitable???

By Locke2005 • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Darn, why didn’t Epstein’s lawyers use that excuse?

Meta?

By Locke2005 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
The same company that demanded a copy of my driver’s license, and then changed my account name to because their support monkey was too stupid to realize that Oregon driver’s license print the last name first? I can’t believe THAT company would shirk their responsibility to protect children! My daughter, like all her peers, originally created her Facebook account by simply lying about her age, after Facebook decided they would comply with COPA by simply barring anyone admitting to being under age 13 from creating an account.

AI Economy Is a ‘Ponzi Scheme,’ Says AI Doc Director

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Vanity Fair:
Focus Features is releasing The AI Doc: Or How I Became an Apocaloptimist in theaters on March 27. If you’re even slightly interested in what’s going on with AI, it’s required viewing: The film touches on all aspects of the technology, from how it’s currently being used to how it will be used in the near future, when we potentially reach the age of artificial general intelligence, or AGI. AGI is a theoretical form of AI that supposedly would be able to perform complex tasks without each step being prompted by a human user — the point at which machines become autonomous, like Skynet in the Terminator franchise. […]

[Director Daniel Roher] interviews nearly all the major players in the AI space: Sam Altman of OpenAI; the Amodei siblings of Anthropic; Demis Hassabis of DeepMind (Google’s AI arm); theorists and reporters covering the subject. Notably absent are Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. “Have you seen that guy speak? He’s like a lizard man,” Roher says regarding Zuckerberg. “Musk said yes initially, but it was right when he was doing all the stuff with Trump, and we just got ghosted after a while,” adds [codirector Charlie Tyrell]. Altman, arguably AI’s greatest mascot, is prominently featured in the documentary. But Roher wasn’t buying it. “That guy doesn’t know what genuine means,” he says. “Every single thing he says and does is calculated. He is a machine. He’s like AI, and it’s in the service of growth, growth, growth. You can be disingenuous and media savvy.” […]

How, exactly, is Roher an apocaloptimist? “We are preaching a worldview,” he says, “in a world that’s asking you to either see this as the apocalypse or embrace it with this unbridled optimism.” He and his film are taking a stance that rests between those two poles. “It’s both at the same time. We have to try and embrace a middle ground so this technology doesn’t consume us, so we can stay in the driver’s seat,” says Roher — meaning, it’s up to all of us to chart the course. “You have to speak up,” says Tyrell. “Things like AI should disclose themselves. If your doctor’s office is using an AI bot, you have to say, I don’t like that.” The driving message behind the film is that resistance starts with the people. That position is shared by The AI Doc producer Daniel Kwan, who won an Oscar for directing Everything Everywhere All at Once and has been at the forefront of discussions about AI in the entertainment industry. […]

Roher and Tyrell both use AI in their everyday lives and openly admit to it being a helpful tool. They also agree that this technology can make daily tasks easier for the average consumer. But at the end of our conversation, we get into the economics of AI and how Wall Street is propping up the industry through huge evaluations of these companies — and Roher gets going yet again. “This is all smoke and mirrors. The entire economy of AI is being propped up by a Ponzi scheme. The hype of this technology is unlike any hype we’ve seen,” he says. “I feel like I could announce in a press release that Academy Award winner Daniel Roher is starting an AI film company, and I could sell it the next day for $20 million. It’s fucking crazy.” […] “These people are prospectors, and they are going up to the Yukon because it’s the gold rush.”

Not that different than previous tech bubbles

By JoshuaZ • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is pretty similar to the “dot com” bubble of the late 1990s, or the railroad boom of the late 1860s early 1870s. Both bubbles had people investing with minimal justification. Businesses which were “Normal thing X but on the internet” got insane amounts of money. And both bubbles popped in ways which were very harmful to the economy. However, at the same time the underlying techs stuck around and became far more common than they were at the height of the bubble. The 1873 collapse took the US about a decade to recover from, but by multiple metrics, such as number of train engines being used, number of passenger miles traveled per a year, tons of freight moved, rail continued to grow with just a small set of blips. Similarly, the internet now is far more extensive and used than even many starry-eyed optimists or hype-obsessed would have predicted in 1998. A tech can be part of an irrational bubble and still be a game-changing technology.

Well, thanks, capt. obvious,

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

but if you think that “the Academy Award-winning teams behind ‘Everything Everywhere All at Once’" gives you some credibility, let me disappoint you, that was one of the dumbest pieces of crap that one could watch that year.

It’s not a ponzi scheme

By nedlohs • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

No investor is being paid profits from new investments. There are no profits being paid pretend or or real, it’s just a giant money vacuum.

China Is Mass-Producing Hypersonic Missiles For $99,000

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader cusco writes:
A private company in China has developed hypersonic missiles that cost the same as a Tesla Model X. This missile, the YKJ-1000, is being marketed for sale at a reported price of $99,000, and it’s in mass production now after successful tests. That is far below what countries will spend to target and shoot down the missile if it’s heading their way.

Besides the low cost, they can be launched from anywhere. The launcher looks like any one of the tens of millions of shipping containers floating around on the ocean, or sitting at ports, or riding along on trucks, or sitting on industrial lots. The launchers for these missiles are hiding in plain sight, in other words. Whatever tactical advantages great-power countries have in ballistics is going away, fast; 1,300 kilometers is 800 miles, and so the range is anything within 800 miles of wherever someone can send a shipping container.
To keep the price down, the missile is reportedly using civilian-grade materials and widely available commercial parts, along with simpler manufacturing methods like die-casting. There are also broader savings from tapping mature supply chains and using China’s large-scale civilian industrial base.

too bad

By retchdog • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I would love to grab a few to play around with but unfortunately the nanny state libs don’t understand the Second Amendment!

What part of “shall not be infringed” do they not understand?

Re: Civilian grade?

By retchdog • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Shipping? They go at Mach 6, but collection on delivery is a bit touchy.

Bad news for Trump and Netanyahu.

By Computershack • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The timing of this couldn’t be any better for Iran. China is desperate for oil and gas due to the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, Iran has plenty of oil and gas and control of the Strait and must be getting desperate for missiles and launchers. I wonder how many of these missiles and launchers a tanker full of Iranian crude would buy.

$99,000 ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE. PLEASE REMOVE POST.

By mgbastard • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Even the company’s own PR *back in NOVEMBER* says that $99,000 figure is not true.

A publicity officer with the firm told China Daily on Friday that claims by many internet users that the manufacturing price of each YKJ-1000 missile is only 700,000 yuan ($99,000) “are not true”.

Chinese State News: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/…

Re: too bad

By maladroit • Score: 5, Informative Thread

“But history confirms that ‘well regulated’ has always meant regulated by the government.”

https://www.law.georgetown.edu…

Chandra Resolves Why Black Holes Hit the Brakes On Growth

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right shares a report from Phys.org:
Astronomers have an answer for a long-running mystery in astrophysics: why is the growth of supermassive black holes so much lower today than in the past? A study using NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory and other X-ray telescopes found that supermassive black holes are unable to consume material as rapidly as they did in the distant past. The results appeared in the December 2025 issue of The Astrophysical Journal.

[…] The team ran tests of the three main possible scenarios currently being considered for the slowdown of black hole growth. These options were: could the decline in black hole growth be caused by less efficient rates of consumption, or by smaller typical black hole masses, or by fewer actively growing black holes? Their analysis of the data, extending over billions of years of cosmic history, led them to the conclusion that black holes are indeed consuming material less rapidly the later they are found after the Big Bang. The researchers expect this trend of slower-growing black holes to continue into the future.

DNRTFA

By Baron_Yam • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I’m guessing:

1) The cloud of material surrounding the black hole normalizes over time just like a planetary disk. At some point, pretty much everything that can intersect with the black hole already has, and only random collisions create new infalling material.

2) When the black hole does feed, it produces a lot of high energy activity just beyond the event horizon, which pushes material away before it can cross.

Almost as if…

By korgitser • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

unable to consume material as rapidly as they did in the distant past

It’s almost as if time slowed down around them the more they eat…

Chandra is a marvel

By necro81 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Let’s bear in mind that Chandra has been in orbit for over 25 years. Not quite as long as Hubble, but from the same era. Unlike Hubble, it was not made for servicing or upgrades - it’s the same hardware that Columbia launched in 1999. At over 20 tons, it was the heaviest payload every launched by the shuttle. And folks reckon it has at least ten more good years of operation ahead of it.

Re:Almost as if…

By burtosis • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

unable to consume material as rapidly as they did in the distant past

It’s almost as if time slowed down around them the more they eat…

While funny and insightful the time dilation occurs primarily above half the speed of light while gravitational pull occurs at all speeds. Natural objects only statistically reach these speeds on a significant basis within a low number of its horizon size widths which is a couple of AU while the gravitational pull is significant at over light years to tens of thousands of light years and significant for attracting and concentrating gas even if weak compared to the galactic gravitational field. Because we know black holes grow, time dilation is more of a weak plug in the drain of the bathtub of material it attracts with gravity.

Its important to note that the summary does not state a reason why we have super massive black holes extremely early in the universe, such as observations of red dots that are ultra massive stars a hundred thousand or even a million suns that direct collapse into the very large category of black holes without needing to feed at all. Despite that, the paper still applies because it does not focus on size but instead growth rate under many parameters including growth rates where the observed brightness to theoretically maximum brightness is decreasing.

NASA Halts Work On Gateway To Develop a Lunar Base

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA is reportedly halting work on the lunar Gateway in favor of a more direct push to build a lunar base. The new plan would cost tens of billions over the next decade, though the change could face hurdles because Congress previously funded Gateway specifically. SpaceNews reports:
“Starting today, we’re building humanity’s first deep space outpost,” said Carlos Garcia-Galan, program executive for NASA’s moon base effort. The lunar base will take place in three phases. Phase 1, running from 2026 to 2028, “is all about getting to the moon reliably,” he said. That includes a significant increase in the cadence of lander missions through the Commercial Lunar Payload Services and other programs. It will also focus on developing enabling technologies and getting “ground truth” for potential base locations at the lunar south pole.

Phase 2, from 2029 through 2031, starts building the base, he said. That would include building out communications, navigation, power and other infrastructure, developing larges CLPS cargo landers and supporting two crewed missions a year. Phase 3, beginning 2032, will enable “long distance and long duration human exploration” on the moon, he said, with routine logistics missions to the moon and uncrewed cargo return missions from the moon. Garcia-Galan said NASA foresees spending $10 billion each on Phases 1 and 2. Phase 3, lasting to at least 2036, would cost an additional $10 billion or more.

The base would leverage existing programs, although with some changes. NASA is planning to revamp the Lunar Terrain Vehicle program after concluding the current approach would take too long to get a crew-capable rover to the moon. “We were projecting a delivery on the lunar surface by 2030,” he said. The agency is instead issuing a draft request for proposals for simplified rovers that could be quicker and easier to develop but could be upgraded later. The base, though, would include some new capabilities and technologies. One example Garcia-Galan provided was MoonFall, a drone that would be able to hop from one location to another on the lunar surface. The drones will be “built on the legacy” of Ingenuity, the small Mars helicopter. “We’re going to take everything that we learned from Ingenuity’s systems, the avionics, all of that, to build this.”

Re: Illegal

By linuxguy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

> It is however entirely sensible…

This is a very slippery slope.

Re:Illegal

By Whateverthisis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It is not illegal to announce intended plans. The articles themselves say it will require approval by Congress.

I know it’s knee-jerk to hate on the executive branch and Trump, but using terms like “illegal” becomes hyperbolic and meaningless if its overused and used in a factually incorrect way.

Re:Illegal

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Not yet it’s not. At this point they have a plan and a policy shift. They still need congress’s approval, but this is literally the normal way projects are changed:
1. Come up with a plan based on policy (executive branch).
2. Go to congress to get funding approval.

Given that Gateway was funded by the OBBB - a purely republican and Trump led legislation there’s very little reason to believe that they won’t approve the change in direction.

And nuclear propulsion

By necro81 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Missing from the summary is this tidbit:

NASA will launch the Space Reactor1 Freedom, the first nuclear powered interplanetary spacecraft, to Mars before the end of 2028, demonstrating advanced nuclear electric propulsion in deep space....
When SR-1 Freedom reaches Mars, it will deploy the Skyfall payload of Ingenuityclass helicopters to continue exploring the Red Planet. SR-1 Freedom will establish flight heritage nuclear hardware, set regulatory and launch precedent, and activate the industrial base for future fission power systems across propulsion, surface, and longduration missions.

So, a nuclear-electric tug between Earth and Mars, and more helicopters on the red planet. That seems 1) much more likely to happen than the lunar base plans, and 2) very exciting technologically.

Re:Illegal

By necro81 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

In case anyone is curious, this is illegal.

So is launching a war in Iran without Congressional approval. So is cancelling funding mandated by Congress. So are foreign gifts, emoluments, and self-dealing. So is federalizing the National Guard on false pretenses. So is putting a sitting president’s mug on a coin. And yet…

Hong Kong Police Can Demand Passwords Under New National Security Rules

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
Hong Kong police can now demand phone or computer passwords from those who are suspected of breaching the wide-ranging National Security Law (NSL). Those who refuse could face up to a year in jail and a fine of up to $12,700, and individuals who provide “false or misleading information” could face up to three years in jail. It comes as part of new amendments to a bylaw under the NSL that the government gazetted on Monday.

The NSL was introduced in Hong Kong in 2020, in wake of massive pro-democracy protests the year before. Authorities say the laws, which target acts like terrorism and secession, are necessary for stability — but critics say they are tools to quash dissent. The new amendments also give customs officials the power to seize items that they deem to “have seditious intention.”

Monday’s amendments ensure that “activities endangering national security can be effectively prevented, suppressed and punished, and at the same time the lawful rights and interests of individuals and organizations are adequately protected,” Hong Kong authorities said on Monday. Changes to the bylaw was announced by the city’s leader, John Lee, bypassing the city’s legislative council. The NSL also allows for some trials to be heard behind closed doors.

That’s Fine

By Bahbus • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Just set up a special alternate password that when entered wipes the device. You didn’t refuse and it isn’t “false or misleading”, technically.

Digital detox

By BeaverCleaver • Score: 3 Thread

Stop carrying a phone with you everywhere.

Re:That’s Fine

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Yeah, enjoy political prison.

You cannot tell

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Without knowing this story was about Hong Kong, you could have thought it credible enough in the current environment to be applying in the U.S.

Wine 11 Rewrites How Linux Runs Windows Games At the Kernel Level

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Linux gamers are seeing massive performance gains with Wine’s new NTSYNC support, “which is a feature that has been years in the making and rewrites how Wine handles one of the most performance-sensitive operations in modern gaming,” reports XDA Developers. Not every game will see a night-and-day difference, but for the games that do benefit from these changes, “the improvements range from noticeable to absurd.” Combined with improvements to Wayland, graphics, and compatibility, as well as a major WoW64 architecture overhaul, the release looks less like an incremental update and more like one of Wine’s most important upgrades in years. From the report:
The numbers are wild. In developer benchmarks, Dirt 3 went from 110.6 FPS to 860.7 FPS, which is an impressive 678% improvement. Resident Evil 2 jumped from 26 FPS to 77 FPS. Call of Juarez went from 99.8 FPS to 224.1 FPS. Tiny Tina’s Wonderlands saw gains from 130 FPS to 360 FPS. As well, Call of Duty: Black Ops I is now actually playable on Linux, too. Those benchmarks compare Wine NTSYNC against upstream vanilla Wine, which means there’s no fsync or esync either. Gamers who use fsync are not going to see such a leap in performance in most games.

The games that benefit most from NTSYNC are the ones that were struggling before, such as titles with heavy multi-threaded workloads where the synchronization overhead was a genuine bottleneck. For those games, the difference is night and day. And unlike fsync, NTSYNC is in the mainline kernel, meaning you don’t need any custom patches or out-of-tree modules for it work. Any distro shipping kernel 6.14 or later, which at this point includes Fedora 42, Ubuntu 25.04, and more recent releases, will support it. Valve has already added the NTSYNC kernel driver to SteamOS 3.7.20 beta, loading the module by default, and an unofficial Proton fork, Proton GE, already has it enabled. When Valve’s official Proton rebases on Wine 11, every Steam Deck owner gets this for free.

All of this is what makes NTSYNC such a big deal, as it’s not simply a run-of-the-mill performance patch. Instead, it’s something much bigger: this is the first time Wine’s synchronization has been correct at the kernel level, implemented in the mainline Linux kernel, and available to everyone without jumping through hoops.

Wine 11

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Well at least someone can get their 11th version of something running correctly.

If anything will do it

By JustAnotherOldGuy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If anything will get people to move to Linux, increases in gaming performance will. I know a couple of people who moved to Linux and virtually every game they play runs faster on Linux than on Windows. Also, some oddball USB stuff that wouldn’t work under Windows works perfectly under Linux. They’re not going back; they’re more than happy using Linux as their daily driver.

Re:Will this finally make ReactOS useful?

By bn-7bc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Well if you are in the us system76 might have something fot you

Re:If anything will do it

By Chromium_One • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Depends what you mean by “very few”

https://areweanticheatyet.com/

Check the list, see what your collection looks like.

Re:Will this finally make ReactOS useful?

By markdavis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

>“Would be nice to be able to use it for actual work.”

Would it? How would it be better than existing Linux distros with tons of high-performance native apps AND the ability to mimick whatever GUI the user is familiar with AND use WINE to do better at running MS-Windows programs?

ReactOS development has been going on for decades and still doesn’t have much to show for itself. I see ReactOS as a kludge to try and make a free and open version of inferior technology. We already have a free and open OS with superior technology and with a tremendously larger installed user and developer base.

Google’s Android Automotive Is Moving From the Dashboard To the ‘Brain’ of the Car

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google is expanding Android Automotive from the infotainment screen into the broader non-safety “brain” of software-defined vehicles. With its new Android Automotive OS for Software-Defined Vehicles, the in-car experience will feel “much more cohesive and the latest features will reach your driveway faster,” Matt Crowley, Android Automotive’s group product manager, writes in a blog post. “From a truly integrated voice experience to proactive maintenance reminders, your car will become a true extension of your digital life,” Crowley adds. The Verge reports:
With its new software, Google is promising faster over-the-air software updates, better voice assistants, and more proactive vehicle maintenance alerts. Non-driving functions like climate control, lighting, and seating adjustment would fall under Android’s control. And the system would move beyond basic infotainment to create a unified ecosystem for features like remote cabin conditioning, digital key management, and personalized driver profiles.

For automakers, the new system promises less expensive software development costs and an opportunity to focus on what matters most to them: branding. By providing the “foundational code and a common language for their software,” Google says automakers will be free to design cool experiences for their customers. Google says its already working with companies like Renault Group and Qualcomm to bring its new software-defined vehicle version of Android Automotive to more cars. A variety of automakers already use regular Android Automotive, like Volvo, Polestar, General Motors, Nissan, and Honda.

The reason I like CarPlay & Android Auto.

By MikeDataLink • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Is that it is tied to my phone and NOT to my car.

Another case of so much “No”.

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“From a truly integrated voice experience to proactive maintenance reminders, your car will become a true extension of your digital life,” …

(a) I don’t like “voice experiences” and try not to use them.
(b) I don’t want my car nagging me about recommended maintenance - or anything really.
(c) I have a minimal “digital life” and don’t want my car(s) involved with that, especially as an “extension” - whatever that means here..

I’m not a Luddite, but don’t need or want every part of my life integrated, especially as Google (and/or others) will be trying to track and monetize it. There’s nothing wrong with compartmentalizing things.

Well this is going to be a disaster

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
So this kind of software is very expensive. Which is why the automotive companies are happy to offload it onto google. Google of course is probably planning on hoovering up a ton of information about you related to your car as part of this. How I wouldn’t be surprised to find them trying to hook into your GPS to monitor everywhere you go. For the record I turn my GPS off not because of privacy but because it eats phone battery life but still..

The issue here is that Google is probably going to find that they’re not making as much money off of the data as they hoped or thought so they’re going to start cutting corners and the software is going to start to suck.

Meanwhile Facebook is still out there buying up laws that require age verification for basically everything. This is because there is now so much AI slop and so many bot swarms that their advertisers are forced to confront the reality that advertising on Facebook or buying Facebook data isn’t very useful. So they want to have a way to perfectly track you and tell whether you’re a bot or not so that the data remains valuable.

So we can look forward to having the log into our cars and be completely tracked just like every other aspect of our digital Life. Because that’s fun.

Your vehicle …

By PPH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… no longer meets the minimum system requirements for the current version of Android Automotive. Please upgrade before attempting to drive.

Re:Gemini Is Worse Than Old Android Auto

By NaCh0 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

All I want it to do is find gas stations ahead of me in the direction I’m travelling.

There are zero cases where I want to turn around and backtrack my path unless there are no other options.

Repeat for “fast food ahead of me”, “starbucks ahead of me”, etc.

OpenAI Discontinues Sora Video Platform App

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI is shutting down Sora, its generative-AI video creation platform it launched in December 2024. “The move is one of a number of steps OpenAI is taking to refocus on business and coding functions ahead of a potential initial public offering as soon as the fourth quarter of this year,” reports the Wall Street Journal.

CEO Sam Altman announced the changes to staff on Tuesday. “We’re saying goodbye to Sora,” the Sora Team said in a post on X. “To everyone who created with Sora, shared it, and built community around it: thank you. What you made with Sora mattered, and we know this news is disappointing. We’ll share more soon, including timelines for the app and API and details on preserving your work.”

Last week, OpenAI announced plans to combine its Atlas web browser, ChatGPT app, and Codex coding app into a singular desktop “superapp.” “We realized we were spreading our efforts across too many apps and stacks, and that we need to simplify our efforts,” said CEO of Applications, Fidji Simo. “That fragmentation has been slowing us down and making it harder to hit the quality bar we want.” This could behind the decision to kill Sora as the company redirects its resources and top talent towards productivity tools that benefit both enterprises and individual users.

Orly?

By CEC-P • Score: 5, Funny Thread
“Guys, for real, we’re doing fine financially. Ignore the dozen lawsuits and lack of stable income and customer perception of our products. We’re cancelling Sora because we don’t like it. That’s the reason. Trust me!” - Sam Altman, probably (paraphrased).

Really?

By the_skywise • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“Focus on core values”

Yeah, BS.

Disney made a major investment and had them shut Sora down so Disney can use it in house exclusively.

Re:What!?

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Never mind this. When will the Retool and MongoDB ad banners meet in the middle?

Well, that’s a progression

By Turkinolith • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
OpenAI, from a non-profit pushing the tech forward, to a for-profit that tried to hold its position, to trying to become a public traded so their now trimming stuff to be more “investor friendly”.

Ah, it’s like the cycle of “enshitification” in rapid fire.

Re:Really?

By applique • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Disney cancelled the deal: https://www.hollywoodreporter....

Arm Unveils New AGI CPU With Meta As Debut Customer

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Arm unveiled its first self-developed data center chip, the AGI CPU, designed for handling agentic AI workloads. The new chip was built in partnership with Meta and manufactured by TSMC. Other customers for the new chip include OpenAI, Cloudflare, SAP, and SK Telecom. Reuters reports:
The new chip, called the AGI CPU, will address data-crunching needed for a specific type of AI that is able to act on behalf of users with minimal oversight, instead of responding to queries as part of a chatbot. For years, Arm, majority-owned by Japan’s SoftBank Group has relied only on intellectual property for revenue, licensing its designs to companies such as Qualcomm and Nvidia and then collecting a royalty payment based on the number of units sold.

“It’s a very pivotal moment for the company,” CEO Rene Haas said in an interview with Reuters. The new chip will be overseen by Mohamed Awad, head of the company’s cloud AI business, and Arm has additional designs in the works that it plans to release at 12- to 18-month intervals. TSMC is fabricating the device on its 3-nanometer technology and is made from two distinct pieces of silicon that operate as a single chip. Arm plans to put it into volume production in the second half of this year but has received test chips that function as expected. In addition to the chip itself, Arm is working with server makers such as Lenovo and Quanta Computer to offer complete systems.

AGI = Just a name

By Misagon • Score: 3 Thread

“AGI” is just a silly name chosen for marketing purposes.
Not even close to “Artificial General Intelligence”.
Nothing to get agitated about.

Language is important though

By presidenteloco • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Because when enough people start using a technical term incorrectly, that mistake becomes the “official, most correct” usage of the term in the natural language.

Examples:

CPU - you know, the big beige computer box under your desk, as opposed to the “monitor”. Luckily somehow English has escaped from that misuse that was common in the 1990s and 2000s.

“I could care less” - This now means “I couldn’t care less” which actually made literal sense.

“Meme” - you know, those silly viral images or animations passed around on socials or the Interweb: Example “Grumpy Cat”
                                As opposed to its intended scientific meaning as “a unit of information with the property that it can induce its hosts to replicate it and thus carry it forward in time.” Examples: the holy books of a religion.

And now we have “AGI” which if we’re not careful will come to mean “Agentic AI” or even, an ARM chip used for AI, as opposed to “Artificial General Intelligence”.

 

Anthropic’s Claude Can Now Use Your Computer To Finish Tasks

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic is testing a new Claude feature that lets users send a request from their phone and have the AI carry it out directly on their computer, such as opening apps, using a browser, or editing files. The move follows the viral spread of OpenClaw earlier this year, which has gained cult popularity among devs for the ability to run local, 24/7 personal workflows. CNBC reports:
Users can now message Claude a task from a phone, and the AI agent will then complete that task, Anthropic announced Monday. After being prompted, Claude can open apps on your computer, navigate a web browser and fill in spreadsheets, Anthropic said. One prompt Anthropic demonstrated in a video posted Monday is a user running late for a meeting. The user asks Claude to export a pitch deck as a PDF file and attach it to a meeting invite. The video shows Claude carrying out the task. […]

Anthropic cautioned that computer use “is still early compared to Claude’s ability to code or interact with text.” “Claude can make mistakes, and while we continue to improve our safeguards, threats are constantly evolving,” Anthropic warned. The company added that it has built the computer use capability “with safeguards that minimize risk,” and that Claude will always request permission before accessing new apps. Users can use Dispatch, a feature it released last week in Claude Cowork. That lets users have a continuous conversation with Claude from a phone or desktop and assign the agent tasks.

Can it …

By allo • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Can it click “I am not a robot” checkboxes for me?

“Claude can make mistakes”

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Yeah, don’t you just HATE it when you tell it to attach a pitch deck to the email, and instead it attaches your entire porn collection? I know I do…

Everything bad about MS Copilot…

By larwe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is everything that was wrong with Microsoft Copilot except even worse because it’s cloud based. The idea of allowing a cloud-based service to remote control your computer (especially since most people operate their computer with full admin access) is crazysauce. There are already plenty of stories about LLMs permanently deleting code and other work product, and then saying “oops you’re right that was a mistake on my part”, Giving them essentially unfettered access to your local filesystem? Not for this little black duck.

Example

By PPH • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

a user running late for a meeting. The user asks Claude to export a pitch deck as a PDF file and attach it to a meeting invite. The video shows Claude carrying out the task.

Sounds like mid-level management drone work. Next step: Claude handles the meeting presentation. One entire management tier wiped out.

I’m OK with this.

Re:Just me?

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Just wait until you hear someone talking to Claude on their phone, then interject with, “Hey Claude, order 5 tons of surströmming at highest available price, same day delivery.”

Either Claude fails and the person realizes it doesn’t necessarily do as told, or it succeeds and the person realizes it’s a really really bad idea.

Relevant Xkcd Listening. :-)

Self-Propagating Malware Poisons Open Source Software, Wipes Iran-Based Machines

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
A new hacking group has been rampaging the Internet in a persistent campaign that spreads a self-propagating and never-before-seen backdoor — and curiously a data wiper that targets Iranian machines. The group, tracked under the name TeamPCP, first gained visibility in December, when researchers from security firm Flare observed it unleashing a worm that targeted cloud-hosted platforms that weren’t properly secured. The objective was to build a distributed proxy and scanning infrastructure and then use it to compromise servers for exfiltrating data, deploying ransomware, conducting extortion, and mining cryptocurrency. The group is notable for its skill in large-scale automation and integration of well-known attack techniques.

More recently, TeamPCP has waged a relentless campaign that uses continuously evolving malware to bring ever more systems under its control. Late last week, it compromised virtually all versions of the widely used Trivy vulnerability scanner in a supply-chain attack after gaining privileged access to the GitHub account of Aqua Security, the Trivy creator. Over the weekend, researchers said they observed TeamPCP spreading potent malware that was also worm-enabled, meaning it had the potential to spread to new machines automatically, with no interaction required of victims behind the keyboard. […]

As the weekend progressed, CanisterWorm [as Aikido has named the malware] was updated to add an additional payload: a wiper that targets machines exclusively in Iran. When the updated worm infects machines, it checks if the machine is in the Iranian timezone or is configured for use in that country. When either condition was met, the malware no longer activated the credential stealer and instead triggered a novel wiper that TeamPCP developers named Kamikaze. Eriksen said in an email that there’s no indication yet that the worm caused actual damage to Iranian machines, but that there was “clear potential for large-scale impact if it achieves active spread.”
It’s unclear what the motive is for TeamPCP. Aikido researcher Charlie Eriksen wrote: “While there may be an ideological component, it could just as easily be a deliberate attempt to draw attention to the group. Historically, TeamPCP has appeared to be financially motivated, but there are signs that visibility is becoming a goal in itself. By going after security tools and open-source projects, including Checkmarx as of today, they are sending a clear and deliberate signal.”

No chance any Israelis involved, is there?

By Locke2005 • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
Israel has zero hackers working on trying to damage the Iranian nuclear program… right?

Can’t wait!

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

How long will it be before malware such as this is used to (further) poison LLMs? Is there the potential to make LLM outputs strategically false and/or propagandistic and/or psychologically damaging?

IANAP, so I don’t know if these things are feasible. But if I was a black-hat hacker with a grudge - or one who simply gets off on wreaking havoc - I’d be pursuing that course of action.

Re:is the “lesson”

By tlhIngan • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Kubermetes is like Docker. They’re container systems. Basically they use Linux namespaces to let you run an independent userspace to your current userspace. This can have valuable benefits - like needing to run an ancient userspace for some tool on modern hardware (e.g., if you need an Ubuntu 14.04 LTS environment for some reason, it’s basically impossible to run it on modern hardware without building your own kernel and stuff).

All Linux is doing is standard app level virtualization - you know the same protections that keep your web browser from interfering with your word processor.

Containers have their uses, and are far more lightweight than VMs since it’s just a few additional Linux processes in the end (they all run on the host kernel natively). They are still vulnerable to the same inter-process attacks because to Linux, they’re just another process running on the same machine. Kubernetes and Docker just are applications that help manage the Linux namespaces and virtual file systems

Epic Games To Cut More Than 1,000 Jobs As Fortnite Usage Falls

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Epic Games is cutting more than 1,000 jobs as usage of its flagship title, Fortnite, falls. “The layoffs aren’t related to AI,” CEO Tim Sweeney noted. Reuters reports:
The cuts, along with more than $500 million in savings from lower contracting and marketing spending and unfilled roles would put the company in “a more stable place,” Sweeney said in a note to employees. […]

“We’ve had challenges delivering consistent Fortnite magic,” Sweeney said, adding “market conditions today are the most extreme” since the early days of the company founded in 1991.

The move marks Epic’s second major round of layoffs in three years. In September 2023, the company cut about 830 jobs, or roughly 16% of its workforce. It was not immediately clear what percentage of staff would be impacted by Tuesday’s announcement.

Here’s an idea

By Reckoning • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
You’re a game studio. Make a new game. I know what you’re saying, it’s too early! Fortunately JUST came out in 2017. That was like yesterday!

Jazz Time

By TwistedGreen • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Fortnite is their flagship title? More like their only title.

Time to bring back Jazz Jackrabbit!

Not especially surprising

By Stolovaya • Score: 3 Thread

Epic’s been coasting on Fortnite and Unreal Engine money.

The Epic Game Store is a joke and loses them money, between giving away games, courting publishers over players, and not even trying to compete with other storefronts (Steam is feature rich, GOG is DRM-free). Paying for exclusives, even though usually timed, also costs money and doesn’t really sit well with a lot of gamers.

It also costs money to fight companies like Google and Valve, to make it to where in-game transactions aren’t charged the same cut that Google and Valve’s storefronts have.

It sounds like the quality of Fortnite has dwindled, and the costs for skins has gone up.

It doesn’t help that it’s run by Tim Sweeney. He’s a bit of an asshole and isn’t really anyone that should be speaking for the company.

FCC Bans Imports of New Foreign-Made Routers, Citing Security Concerns

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
New submitter the_skywise shares a report from Reuters:
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission said on Monday it was banning the import of all new foreign-made consumer routers, the latest crackdown on Chinese-made electronic gear over security concerns. China is estimated to control at least 60% of the U.S. market for home routers, boxes that connect computers, phones, and smart devices to the internet. The FCC order does not impact the import or use of existing models, but will ban new ones.

The agency said a White House-convened review deemed imported routers pose “a severe cybersecurity risk that could be leveraged to immediately and severely disrupt U.S. critical infrastructure.” It said malicious actors had exploited security gaps in foreign-made routers “to attack households, disrupt networks, enable espionage, and facilitate intellectual property theft,” citing their role in major hacks like Volt and Salt Typhoon. The determination includes an exemption for routers the Pentagon deems do not pose unacceptable risks.

Re:Cisco vs. TP-Link

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I thought the joke was him referring to “the feds”. This is the Trump administration, it’s not about backdoors, it’s about bribes and identity politics.

There aren’t any NOT foreign-made routers

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We’re a little early for April 1, but to me, I just read “When your router dies, no more Internet for you.” When I read more about this, it only applies to future products that haven’t been approved yet, but that’s only a reprieve of a couple of years before some forced redesign obsoletes the current products.

The current reality is that ~100% of all network routers currently manufactured (consumer-grade or otherwise) are made overseas. Except one. Starlink.

Donald Trump’s FCC and Trump’s national security goons just gave Elon Musk a monopoly on consumer Internet. This is what corruption looks like.

Worse, because every iPhone and Android phone is a router, Donald Trump’s FCC just banned every future smartphone. And Mac. And PC.

There’s an exception that companies can apply for, but whether anyone will get an exception or not is entirely at the whims of the FCC, which in the current administration likely means “companies that sucked up to / bribed Donald Trump adequately”.

But critically, there aren’t manufacturing facilities in the United States that can accommodate even a tiny fraction of the smartphone or network router manufacturing that the United States requires. It would take a decade for those facilities to be built even if they literally started building them today. So what this means is that for companies that don’t get exceptions, they will be unable to improve their products for a decade or more.

And when individual components (even something as minor as a ) stop being manufactured, which they inevitably will, those products will require a sufficient design change to require a new import authorization, and it will no longer be possible to import them at all. If they don’t have a U.S. factory lined up by then — which is almost impossible, statistically speaking — then their ability to stay in business will be at the whims of the current administration, whoever is in power at the time.

This, right here. is what corruption looks like. Pure, unvarnished corruption.

The excuse given is that building these products overseas poses a risk of supply chain disruption. But if the products are built in the U.S., the parts that go into them will all still be built overseas. It will take at least a decade before that problem can be solved. Building the final products in the U.S. does nothing to reduce supply chain disruption. In fact, it makes it worse, because the countries that make the parts can refuse to ship the components, allowing export of only finished products, and then your U.S. manufacturing dries up. And there’s a strong incentive for them to play games like that, hoping that you will relent and start allowing their cheaper finished products into the country.

This is why countries whose leaders are not complete and utter morons don’t pass laws like this, instead passing laws that require a certain percentage of COMPONENTS to be made in their country. That number increases over time. Eventually, once a suitable percentage of components are made in their country, they can start insisting on local manufacturing of the finished products, confident that there is a robust supply chain capable of backing local manufacturing. And even that can backfire, causing manufacturers to stop selling in a country rather than comply with their laws, but at least it starts moving them in the right direction, assuming that local manufacturing (as opposed to just “not China”) is the right direction (which is highly dubious, but that’s a much longer discussion).

What our current administration is doing shows that they do not understand technology, that they do not understand manufacturing, and that they do not understand the realities of import-export laws. In short, they are lunatics operating in an ivory tower with complete blinders on that prevent them from seeing the real world.

How quickly can we get ALL of these clowns out of office?

Re:Cisco vs. TP-Link

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Cisco gear. Chinese backdoors installed at the factory, NSA backdoors installed when they ship it to you.

I’ll take my chances with TP-Link. Actually, I really like GL.iNet hardware at the moment. Very solid, and runs a version of OpenWRT. You can flash standard OpenWRT onto most of it too.

Re:Business opportunity!

By pixelpusher220 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

the only secure windows is CE/ME/NT

Re:$500

By Midnight Thunder • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

We are moving to an economy where if you aren’t in the 1%, then everything will be a few months wage. This is definitely a case where a US administration was doing everything to increase prices, intended or not. Its what happens when you let a monkey and his buffoons run a system that requires understanding of consenquences.