Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Google DeepMind Calls For US To Spearhead AI Standards Body
  2. Linux Foundation’s Latest Foray Is To Standardize Internet-Native Payments For AI Agents
  3. OnePlus Is Reportedly Shutting Down In the US, Europe
  4. IBM Stock Collapses After a Grave Warning About AI
  5. New York Becomes First State To Impose Data Center Moratorium
  6. StubHub, CEO Hit With ‘Deceptive Practices’ Class Action Over Mass Scalping
  7. Indian Scientists Produce Most Detailed 3D Atlas of the Human Brainstem
  8. Scientists Find Sugar Deep In Our Galaxy
  9. Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact
  10. Microsoft Promises To Fix Search With Major Windows 11 Overhaul
  11. US Government Warns That Russia State Hackers Are Coming After Your Router
  12. German Firm Files For Insolvency After Cybercriminals Shut Down Production For 6 Weeks
  13. States Sue to Block Paramount-Warner Bros Merger, Defying DOJ
  14. Apple Reportedly Agreed to Intel Chips To Avoid White House Tariffs
  15. Cloudflare Precursor Watches Your Mouse and Keyboard To Decide If You Are Human

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Google DeepMind Calls For US To Spearhead AI Standards Body

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google DeepMind chief Demis Hassabis is calling for a U.S.-led AI standards body to review frontier models for national security risks such as cybersecurity and biological threats. His proposal would create a federally overseen public-private organization, initially voluntary and eventually mandatory for U.S. deployment. CNBC reports:
Google DeepMind boss Demis Hassabis, a Nobel laureate, said in an article posted on X on Tuesday that “urgent action” was needed to address risks associated with artificial general intelligence (AGI) — the point at which AI matches or surpasses human intelligence. “We’ve already seen the challenges frontier models pose for cybersecurity, and other threats including nuclear and bio risks may soon emerge as capabilities continue to advance,” he said.

[…] Hassabis said the U.S. was well positioned to lead in developing an AI framework “given its economic and technical standing.” “It could establish a new Standards Body modelled on a federally overseen public-private partnership or self-regulatory organisation, much like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), with a board that includes independent leading technical experts and open-source representatives,” he added. FINRA regulates brokerage firms and exchange markets in the U.S.

The proposed body would need “substantial” funding “in order to attract world-class technical talent and provide the necessary compute resources for large-scale testing,” Hassabis said. Funding would “likely” come from industry, he added. Frontier labs would initially voluntarily share models with the body for review up to 30 days before release, before becoming mandatory for deployment in the U.S. market after being shown to be “effective.” “Specific agentic AI tests could look for attempts to bypass safety guardrails or signs of deception, and ensure best practices, such as digitally watermarking AI-generated images and generating human-readable output tokens to understand model reasoning,” Hassabis said.
Further reading: Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact

Linux Foundation’s Latest Foray Is To Standardize Internet-Native Payments For AI Agents

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Today, the Linux Foundation launched the x402 Foundation to standardize internet-native payments for AI agents, APIs, and applications, based on Coinbase’s contributed x402 protocol. Backed by companies including AWS, American Express, Cloudflare, Google, Mastercard, Stripe, and Visa, the effort aims to make payments work directly over HTTP (assuming users are comfortable letting AI agents handle financial transactions).

“The whole idea is to give agents access to money and, through that financial independence, improve their set of capabilities to pretty much anything on the internet,” Lincoln Murr, Coinbase’s AI product lead, told CNBC last month when the company announced the protocol. “In the 2010s, every internet company dealt with the transition from desktop and web into a mobile environment. And now in the late 2020s, we’re seeing the exact same thing happen where agents are going to be the new primary economic actors on the internet.”

OnePlus Is Reportedly Shutting Down In the US, Europe

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OnePlus will reportedly announce this week that it is shutting down its brand in the U.S. and Europe, following months of signs that parent company Oppo was winding down the brand’s global presence. India and China are reportedly unaffected, but it’s unclear whether Oppo will replace the brand directly in those markets. The move also raises questions about future support for existing OnePlus users. 9to5Google reports:
WinFuture reports that OnePlus is gearing up for an official withdrawal from the U.S. and European markets, with the announcement due in the “coming days” this week. Closed-door press conferences have apparently happened, with no details shared on the exact reason OnePlus as a brand is shutting down in these markets. India and China are, as far as this report claims, not affected. The report, citing “well-informed sources,” notes that this OnePlus announcement will come amid “fundamental changes” to Oppo’s strategy, but the big point here is the global death of OnePlus.

OnePlus is a Chinese smartphone manufacturer

By RobinH • Score: 4, Informative Thread
If, like me, you didn’t know who OnePlus was.

RAM costs

By alvinrod • Score: 3 Thread
I wonder if it’s the memory costs that did them in. They tended to make devices for the higher end of the market and putting 16 GB in a phone is going to be incredibly expensive for a company that can’t manufacture their own memory chips or drive enough volume to get discounts on purchases or preferred treatment from memory manufacturers.

I’m not an Android user, but the OnePlus 15 that they released last year was a good device that was well regarded. I know a lot of other posters here have had good things to say about them over the years as well. Hopefully they’re able to rebound from this and can continue offering great products.

IBM Stock Collapses After a Grave Warning About AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
IBM shares plunged after the company warned that Q2 revenue and earnings would miss expectations, blaming customers’ sudden shift in spending toward AI hardware instead of software services. However, CEO Arvind Krishna did not place all the blame on IBM’s customers. The CEO also said it “faltered” by failing to “anticipate the magnitude of the capex reprioritization.”

“These conditions require our teams to execute perfectly, and this quarter we faltered. We did not adapt and move quickly enough, and numerous large deals failed to close on the timelines we expected, driving the majority of our shortfall.” Fast Company reports:
In the preliminary report, IBM said that for its second quarter of fiscal 2026, it expects revenue of $17.2 billion, which is up 1%. It also said it expects a Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) of $2.93, up 5%. However, as noted by CNBC, these preliminary results are below what analysts were expecting, which was $17.86 billion in revenue, and an EPS of $3.01, according to FactSet data.

IBM’s answer will be: chop chop chop

By hwstar • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Layoffs are coming.

Historically this is what IBM has done in the past to improve profitability.

I view this current debacle as a failure on management’s part to see what might be coming up in the sector as emerging tech just like layoffs are a failure of management to properly size the company and select the proper roles which drive growth and ultimately profitability.

Will management pay with their heads? That ultimately depends on the board, and maybe the shareholders.

Re:good self awareness

By jd • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Good question. Their POWER series of CPUs were not insignificant in capability, their chip designers were clearly technically sophisticated, and GPUs are just specialised vector processors with a few extra bells and whistles - stuff IBM is extremely familiar with.

It would not have been difficult to release a GPU or other LLM-specific processor to go along with the POWER11. They’d been working on the POWER11 for 4 years, they knew in 2020 that LLMs had a strong potential to be significant for Big Data processing - an area you use big iron for, they’re not rank amateurs, they have plenty of reserve, they could have assembled an emergency team to build a vector processor that was custom-designed for just LLM work, and released an LLM processor card that could run circles around nVidia.

They didn’t. Because, as has happened before, their management is simply too stupid and too slow.

It’s temporary.

By supabeast! • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

IBM is still in fine shape. The company is not losing money. Revenue did not fall off a cliff like the stock price did. If they’re smart IBM can wait this out and quietly prepare for things to bounce back when the insane AI capex ends and people need something IBM is ready to provide. (But, realistically, IBM will just lay off 25,000 good people instead of putting human capital to good use as part of a long term strategy.)

New York Becomes First State To Impose Data Center Moratorium

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
New York has become the first U.S. state to impose a moratorium on large new data centers, pausing construction for one year over concerns that AI-driven data center growth is raising utility bills, straining water supplies, and burdening communities. “As data center development threatens to hike up utility bills, deplete our natural resources, and create uncertainty for New Yorkers, it’s my responsibility to take action and lead,” said New York Governor Kathy Hochul. She will also pursue legislation to repeal sales tax exemptions for large data centers, Hochul added. Reuters reports:
The construction ban will apply to data centers that use 50 megawatts or more of power, officials in the governor’s office said. During the moratorium, the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation will not issue any discretionary permits not already deemed complete, the governor’s office said. Instead, Hochul directed state officials to develop a Generic Environmental Impact Statement to ensure that new data centers coming online are held to “consistent standards,” as well as examine the potential environmental impacts of the construction and operation of data centers in the state. The ban will be lifted once the state finalizes those standards, according to Hochul’s office.

Curious

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

How charging EVs will break the power grid but operating gigawatt slop datacenters is essential?

Praise be

By SumDog • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
Despite electing a communist mayor in their largest city, it seems like the state government is making a solid good move here. We already have way more capacity than China. I high doubt any of the current model hosting providers are anywhere near capacity or have growth curves even approaching them. It’s all investment fraud and NY is doing the right thing to put a hard break on the newest Tulip Mania

StubHub, CEO Hit With ‘Deceptive Practices’ Class Action Over Mass Scalping

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
StubHub and its CEO, Eric Baker, have been hit with a proposed $5-million class-action lawsuit in the United States over the company’s ties to large-scale scalpers — connections reported by CBC News last week. The suit, filed Monday by New York ticket buyer Louis Sanquini, alleges deceptive practices and fraudulent misrepresentation over StubHub’s promoting itself as a “marketplace for fans to buy and sell tickets.” The online ticket resale giant has faced a storm of customer complaints after cancelling thousands of World Cup tickets. The company has repeatedly said it is simply a technology platform that does not buy, sell or possess tickets. However, CBC reported last week that Baker disclosed in recent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that he runs Andro Capital, a hedge fund that engages in large-scale resale of millions of dollars’ worth of sports and concert tickets on the StubHub resale platform.

Sanquini filed the proposed class action in the Southern District of New York, arguing consumers were kept in the dark and that he believed StubHub was a “neutral” marketplace. Lead counsel Kevin Steinberg told CBC News in an emailed statement that “consumers deserve honesty and transparency.” A CBC investigation found that the CEO of online ticket reseller StubHub owns and manages a hedge fund that scalps millions of dollars of its own tickets. “While what StubHub is alleged to have engaged in and perpetrated upon millions of patrons is unfathomable, this case is about transparency and consumer trust. If companies make representations to the public, consumers are entitled to expect that those representations are complete and accurate,” he said.

The claim reads: “Defendants’ failure to disclose this conflict of interest, while affirmatively marketing StubHub as a fan-to-fan marketplace, deceived Plaintiff and the Class and caused them to pay prices, and accept terms, they would not have accepted had the truth been known.” Sanquini argues that had he known StubHub’s CEO held a financial interest and that the company was helping finance professional resellers, he would never have used the resale site to buy tickets to see rock band Kiss in 2023 or to attend a New York Red Bulls-New York City FC Major League Soccer match in 2024.

$5 million is laughably low

By blastard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This should not be filled asking for a mere $5 million. It looks a little like a fake suit to get him and them off the hook. Even if they settled for the full amount they are getting off easy.

Crank it up

By Bahbus • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

StubHub valuation: ~$4 billion
Eric Baker net worth: ~$800 million

This class action should be seeking a minimum of 20% of the company’s value as well as 50% of Eric Baker’s net worth.

Indian Scientists Produce Most Detailed 3D Atlas of the Human Brainstem

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Scientists at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (IIT-M) have created what they describe as the world’s most detailed 3D cellular atlas of the human brainstem, linking whole-brain MRI views to individual neurons across more than 500 tissue sections. The free online atlas, called Anchor, could help researchers better understand diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, stroke, and SIDS by showing how healthy and diseased brain tissue differs cell by cell. The BBC reports:
Built from high-resolution microscope images rather than costlier molecular techniques, it creates a detailed three-dimensional map of the brainstem, identifying more than 200 clusters of brain cells and nerve pathways. Eight chemical markers help distinguish different cell types, producing one of the clearest pictures yet of this vital, but poorly, understood part of the brain. The brainstem occupies only a sliver of the brain, yet it keeps people alive. It links the brain to the spinal cord and controls breathing, heartbeat, sleep, wakefulness and movement.

[…] Users can zoom from the whole brainstem seen on MRI down to individual neurons while maintaining their precise spatial relationships. The researchers have made the atlas freely available online, hoping it becomes a reference tool for neuroscientists, neurologists and neurosurgeons worldwide. Its applications could also extend well beyond anatomy. By comparing healthy brainstem maps with diseased tissue, scientists may better understand disorders ranging from Parkinson’s disease and stroke to Alzheimer’s disease and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). More precise maps could also help neurosurgeons navigate one of the brain’s most delicate regions with greater confidence.

“The” or “A”?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 4, Informative Thread
I don’t want to diminish the accomplishment; that seems like a very cool dataset and probably one that was really fiddly to pull together; but, if you are talking single-neuron resolution; I am curious about whether you can still call an individual sample “the human brainstem” rather than “a human brainstem” and what comparative purposes you can use it for without running into trouble with cases where there are multiple ways for a brainstem to be adequately healthy, so long as certain requirements are met, so you’ll need considerably more samples to draw useful inferences about exactly what the problem abnormality is.

Same sort of thing as when “sequencing the human genome” was a big project. Obviously a major exercise in gene sequencing and a basis for situating subsequent sequencing operations; but once you start talking detail there isn’t ‘the human genome’; literally everyone has one; and it turns out that different differences matter or don’t at radically different levels.

Presumably the methods used to do it once will be helpful in doing it more often in the future; but I’ll be curious what we discover about the balance of ‘normalcy’ vs. some relatively subtle and confusing combination of surprisingly variable ways to have a brainstem that seems to work just fine along with surprisingly subtle, no ghastly big lesions, ways to have one that ends up being totally dodgy.

Put it in a book, you cowards

By 602 • Score: 3 Thread
There is a marvelous book that I look at in the library every year or so: “The brain stem of the cat; a cytoarchitectonic atlas with stereotaxic coordinates”, Berman, Alvin L.; Madison, University of Wisconsin Press; 1968, 175 pages 80 illustrations *59 cm*. Yeah, the book is 2 feet tall, much larger than any of my computer screens.

Scientists Find Sugar Deep In Our Galaxy

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronomers have detected erythrulose, a sugar found in raspberries and self-tanners, in a gas cloud near the center of the Milky Way. While not essential for life itself, the molecule can convert into a form thought to be important for life’s origins, adding evidence that key prebiotic ingredients may be widespread across the galaxy. The Associated Press reports:
Using two dish-shaped radio telescopes in Spain, researchers collected data from a large gas cloud near the center of the Milky Way. They identified the sugar in gas form by comparing telescope signals to samples in the lab. It’s the latest kind of sugar detected in space — in a region crossed by NASA’s twin Voyager, the farthest spacecraft to ever travel from Earth.

Scientists have found interesting chemistry in our galaxy, including building blocks for genetic material and parts of the cell. They spotted a cousin to table sugar near the center of the Milky Way about 25 years ago, and black grains from asteroid Bennu retrieved by NASA’s Osiris-Rex spacecraft yielded other sugars, including a key DNA ingredient. The latest sugar isn’t essential for life, but can easily convert to a form that’s thought to be crucial to kick-starting life on Earth. And it’s one of the most complex sugars spotted so far, said astrophysicist Erika Hamden with the University of Arizona.
The results were published in the journal Nature Astronomy.

That’s it, I’m leaving

By jfdavis668 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Going to move to a sugar-free galaxy.

Sugar In The Milkyway

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Milkways are indeed super sweet. They have a lot of sugar in them.

It might cause diabetes but they are soooooo good.

In addition

By kencurry • Score: 3 Thread
Astronomers noticed that the sugar was concentrated on massive flake-shaped exoplanets that reside in what’s known as the “bowl region” in the Milky Way.

Over 200 Economists Say ‘We Must Act Now’ On AI’s Economic Impact

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press:
Hundreds of economists say in an open letter that institutions "must act now” to address how artificial intelligence could transform the economy and could put many people out of work. The statement released Monday was signed by top economists, along with computer scientists and some executives at tech companies including Anthropic, Google and OpenAI.

“AI may become radically more powerful over the next 10 years,” says the letter organized by Stanford University’s digital economy lab. “This could drive an unprecedented transformation of our economy, larger than the Industrial Revolution, but unfolding over a vastly shorter time frame. It could bring risks, including large-scale job displacement, as well as opportunities such as major gains in living standards.”

The letter, which has only four sentences, says leaders must “build the incentives, guardrails, and institutions needed to steer AI in a direction that complements humans and benefits society.” The Stanford lab says the letter has so far been signed by more than 200 economists and AI researchers, including 16 winners of a Nobel Prize.
“We must be intentional and make collective, democratic choices, rather than letting market forces play out and risking leaving most citizens behind,” wrote computer scientist and AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio, who was also among the signatories. He said it “it is highly plausible that AI will drastically transform our economies.”

Other signatories include Google CEO Eric Schmidt, LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman, and Nobel laureates Joseph Stiglitz, Daron Acemonglu, and Simon Johnson.

200 Economists

By rossdee • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If all the economists in the world were laid end to end, they wouldn’t reach a conclusion.

Markets work governments screw things up

By n2hightech • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
The market does its best job meeting the needs of the people with the fewest rules. Government rules screw up the market and make it less efficient. Anti gouging laws (price controls) lead to shortages. Rent control Housing shortages. Licensing lack of competition. What government needs to do is help provide reliable information, promote truthfulness in advertising. Aid those harmed by bad actions to recover damages. Make it easy for competitors to enter the market. Instead most of the rules and efforts of government seem to favor established companies and prevent new participants.

Over 200 Economists

By DarkOx • Score: 3 Thread

Allow me Fix the headline!

Over 200 Economists Embrace Sensationalism To Drive Ad Impressions on Blogs and Substack Subscriptions.

Re:Lots of magical thinking here

By allo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“There is not even reason to expect LLMs to be still a thing in 10 years.”

Bullshit. Even if development would stop right now, people would use the existing tools the next 10 years and beyond. Even if their usage won’t get better (hardware not getting cheaper and more efficient anymore) many of them run on affordable hardware that is worth the benefit brought by the tool.

I won’t want to bet on the increase continuing like it currently goes for ten years, but people will surely use LLMs and image AI in ten years.
I also think that if current development stops, you can still increase the usefulness of current models by building good harnesses. Current ones are experimental, more complicated than needed and chaotic what to use when.

If you look at professional software, Photoshop doesn’t have great tools because the algorithms are that great, but because they added duct tape at all rough edges of the algorithms. Currently LLM and image AI is getting better too fast that we would even start at duct taping their flaws, because the next model fixes them anyway. But if the growth slows down, we will see tools that improve the use a lot without improving the underlying model.

I also neither believe in AGI, nor in us needing AGI for more than showing it is possible.

Why don’t they propose solutions?

By oumuamua • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
Because these economists have only studied, by design, capitalism. They can’t even think of anything else. Here are some leads:
1) Stop persecuting Left leaning countries like Cuba, we admit the West is out of ideas, let Cuba’s idea play out without sanctions and interference.
2) Look to the past, all this has played out before in the Gilded Age, Marx, the Depression & New Deal, the 60’s, BTW you must read The Iron Heel, the deje vu is immense https://www.gutenberg.org/eboo…
3) People looking at real ideas:
Grace Blakeley, Vulture Capitalism: Empire, Bailouts, Monopoly Power https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
Clara Mattei: The End of Capitalism is Here https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
David Shapiro: Post Labor Economics: https://www.youtube.com/playli…

Microsoft Promises To Fix Search With Major Windows 11 Overhaul

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is overhauling Windows 11 search to prioritize local apps, files, and settings over web results while removing ads, promotions, MSN/Bing clutter, and other distractions. “You’ve have been asking for search that is faster, more relevant, and easier to use — whether you’re opening an app, finding a file, or changing a setting,” Microsoft says in a new blog post. “Because the Windows Search Box is where many people start, we focused first on making results more dependable, easier to scan, and clearer before you click.” Windows Central reports:
The company is highlighting several key improvements, including clearer results that does a better job at showing why a search result is appearing when a query has been typed, alongside prioritizing local results before reaching out to the web.

Search is also getting better at handling things like typos, which should help surface the right results even when the user misspells an app or file. The search home pane will no longer show MSN or Bing content, and promotional content and ads will no longer appear in search results.

These upgrades are now rolling out to Windows Insiders in the Experimental Channel, and are expected to roll out to all Windows 11 users later this year. Insiders may not see the changes right away as they are rolling out in waves.
The full list of changes can be found here.

I can’t Wait!

By oldgraybeard • Score: 5, Funny Thread
For the “Just ask Clippy” advertising campaign.

Uh huh

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Have they tried AI?

Re:For Insiders on the Experimental channel

By crunchy_one • Score: 5, Informative Thread
According to the Microsoft document, the sole thing they’re doing to reduce ad clutter is, “Promotional content has been removed from web results. Web results show the most relevant answer, instead of first showing related products and promotions, helping search feel more focused and less distracting.” And even that has this carve out, “NOTE: Experiences vary by region.” So, all you get is some slight relief using search, and even that depends on where you happen to live.

Re:About frackin’ time.

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It already exists. https://www.voidtools.com/

Returns results as fast as you type and can even index network drives. I’ve been using it daily for years.

Re:For Insiders on the Experimental channel

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It means they’ll fix it for the EU but won’t do anything for the USA.

US Government Warns That Russia State Hackers Are Coming After Your Router

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
CISA and allied governments are warning users to secure their routers as Russian state-backed hackers continue compromising the devices and turning them into proxy nodes to disguise attacks against critical infrastructure. The advisory urges users to disable outdated SNMP versions, use strong passwords, update firmware, and turn off unnecessary router services to reduce the risk of being swept into these botnets. Ars Technica reports:
“Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) Center 16 cyber actors continue to exploit poorly configured and vulnerable networking devices worldwide, opportunistically compromising multiple critical infrastructure sector networks,” the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency said Monday. The hacking groups are tracked under various names, including Berserk Bear, Energetic Bear, Crouching Yeti, Dragonfly, Ghost Blizzard, and Static Tundra. The advisory was co-issued by governments from around the world, including Australia, Denmark, New Zealand, and the UK.

The primary means of compromise the agency warned about was hackers scanning IP ranges with active Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) agents that accept common or default authentication credentials. These scans are run by the very sorts of router botnets the actors are trying to enroll the targeted device in. By sending malicious traffic from spoofed addresses, the hackers can use the SNMP agent on poorly configured routers to run malware. SNMP allows users to collect and organize information about managed networking devices or to modify that information to change device behavior.

With control of a device, the hackers then use it as an exit node when probing or attacking targets in the communications, defense, energy, financial services, and government sectors. By funneling the malicious traffic through a benign-appearing device on a trustworthy IP address, the attackers are able to lower the chances of getting blocked by firewalls and other security defenses. Monday’s advisory made no mention of identical operations carried out in recent years by China. So-called residential proxies are also a go-to tool used by financially motivated criminal hackers to obscure their true IP address. In many cases, these sorts of proxies are made up of millions of streaming devices that are sold with preloaded malware.

Re: distract - distract - distract

By sdinfoserv • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
If Trumpy and company were that concerned about Russian Hacking, perhaps the should not have cut CISA’s budget by 3/4 of a billion dollars. https://www.afcea.org/signal-m…

Re:Shouldn’t this be expected?

By sarren1901 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Don’t the ISPs own the wires? If so, then I would expect the state to first tell the ISP to clean up their properties. Have them show due diligence in getting their customers to update or replace (with what, from who?) their router before eventually kicking it off the network.

My last cable ISP supplied a router/modem combo that they could configure to be secure by default. For the most part, it was. It didn’t have a lot of features and I didn’t care for it’s overall design but it did work.

My current ISP is starlink and they provide the receiver and router as well.

I imagine the vast majority of router’s that are Internet/ISP facing are issued by ISPs themselves as your average user doesn’t go buy their own. Even us nerds, we buy our own but depending on our ISP, it’s still behind their router/modem device in the path from client to Internet.

So if ISPs are issuing the majority of devices, it would make the most sense for the state to be working with these ISP on updating the default settings and pushing out updates or otherwise helping customers update their gear. Let’s hop to it people!

Re:fix your router, we’ll trust you

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Show of hands: How many people sat in on Hegseth’s phone call regarding this topic?

Re:Upgrade

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I am glad I finally retired my older Asus router last year, even though it was running a reflash, and installed a Unifi gateway at home. They seem to be very good with updates. I even turned on the Threat Detection and Blocking (Intrusion Prevention). Then also GeoBlocking (yes, I know they can work around that, but why make it easy?) The nice thing is this little box does everything I had before and TONS more, including running cameras, with no cloud-dependencies and no recurring fees.

Unifi has had several CVSS 10.0 vulnerabilities lately. Quite a lot of those devices are unfortunately still ending up part of botnets.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.c…

And a new one last week…

https://thehackernews.com/2026…

Nice hardware, but the cloud services bring their own risks.

Re:standard practice

By Bert64 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Setting the policy to DROP just means that clients will try multiple times before timing out, which means not only will you waste bandwidth with the retries, but your own clients will experience a delay while they time out instead of receiving an instant rejection.

For legacy IPv4 networks the address space is so congested and in short supply that it’s economically unviable to leave unused addresses, so you gain nothing from this. With IPv6 there might be some very limited security-through-obscurity value to someone not being able to identify a live address, but its also not practical to scan sequential address space anyway.

What this article really highllghts however, is how flawed the perimeter security model is. Modern end user devices will actually do perfectly well on an open connection, as they don’t have any externally visible services. Indeed people frequently connect their devices to public wifi networks where they are fully exposed to the network owner, other users and potentially beyond and it hasn’t caused the apocalypse.

People are relying on the perimeter security model, and then using really lousy insecure devices to actually implement that perimeter so they get the worst possible outcome. User think their devices are inside a secured perimeter when the very device supposed to be enforcing that perimeter has been compromised putting the attacker inside. These devices are often MUCH worse than today’s end user operating systems.

The proper solution is zero trust - assume your devices are fully exposed and have to stand alone.

German Firm Files For Insolvency After Cybercriminals Shut Down Production For 6 Weeks

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
German textile firm ZEGO has filed for insolvency and is blaming a March cyberattack that shut down production for nearly six weeks. “ZEGO’s filing adds another name to the short but growing list of companies that say a digital break-in was commercially fatal to their business,” reports The Register. From the report:
In a notice to customers and suppliers, the organization said it had exhausted every available option before seeking insolvency protection. Managing director Johannes Zenglein described the filing as “one of the most difficult steps in our company’s 37-year history.” “The cyberattack of March 29, 2026, however, impacted our company to an extent that we could not fully compensate for despite our best efforts,” Zenglein wrote. “The consequences resulted in a production outage of nearly six weeks and significant financial strain. These effects ultimately impacted our financial situation so severely that filing for insolvency became necessary.”

ZEGO did not disclose what kind of attack it suffered, whether ransomware was involved, who was behind it, or whether customer or employee data was compromised. What it has made clear is that the operational disruption alone was enough to push the business beyond the point of recovery. ZEGO said insolvency proceedings have now been initiated, but insisted the filing does not necessarily spell the end of the business. It said it plans to keep production running while administrators attempt to restructure the business, preserve jobs, and keep customers and suppliers on board.

Re:Why were critical systems not replaced?

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The article talked about the cost of customer confidence lost too. In other words even if they came back online the 6-week pause would have caused them to lose a bunch of customers. And they don’t have the capital to get them back through advertising campaigns and discounts and such.

It’s actually terrifying how many businesses run at the absolute edge of margins and are perpetually on the verge of collapse. Like how any given city is 3 days away from chaos…

We focus on the tech companies that are making so much money that they literally cannot spend it fast enough. And that also like to keep a ton of cash around for stock BuyBacks. But it really doesn’t take much for most companies to start cutting staff and even shutting all the way down.

This is both how and why increasing interest rates “fights” inflation. Businesses lose access to credit because it costs more to loan so any little problem in their business immediately becomes a major disaster because of credit crunch and they go under putting a whole bunch of people out of work. Those out of work people spend less reducing demand which slows inflation. If the business doesn’t collapse outright it’s at least going to do layoffs and pay cuts which achieves the same goal.

Re:Why were critical systems not replaced?

By znrt • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

if a 37 year old company can’t survive 6 weeks of shutdown and not even get credit to weather the storm and get back on their feet without defaulting on obligations it suggests to me they were already operating on fumes and the cyberattack and aftermath were just the final blow … and ofc a very convenient explanation for that default.

Blaming the wrong thing.

By Gravis Zero • Score: 3 Thread

“The consequences resulted in a production outage of nearly six weeks and significant financial strain. These effects ultimately impacted our financial situation so severely that filing for insolvency became necessary.”

That’s a funny way of explaining that they neglected to implement proper security measures and backup measures for decades.

This is ultimately what wishful thinking and downplaying the importance of cybersecurity gets you.

Nobody is immune

By serafean • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Nobody is immune, survival is about planning, and a bit of luck :
In 2017 Maersk almost got destroyed: notPetya wiped their systems, including domain controllers. Luckily a power outage in ghana kicked the local DC offline during the attack, and thus the sole remaining copy was perserved. Talk about luck.

https://www.wired.com/story/no…

Re:Why were critical systems not replaced?

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

6 weeks of shutdown for a manufacturing company is not something that is easily survivable. Customers will be looking for alternative suppliers, and many won’t switch back. Contracts may have delay and non-fulfilment clauses. Few places are going to have 6 weeks of stock to cover such an event.

What seems unforgivable is that it took 6 weeks to fix.

States Sue to Block Paramount-Warner Bros Merger, Defying DOJ

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A coalition of 12 states led by California is suing to block the $111 billion Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. merger, arguing it would reduce competition in theatrical distribution, blockbuster films, and basic cable licensing. The challenge (PDF) defies the DOJ’s approval of the deal. Variety reports:
The coalition, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, alleges that the $111 billion transaction violates the Clayton Act by lessening competition in three distinct markets: wide-release theatrical distribution, “top-grossing” theatrical distribution, and basic cable licensing. “The unlawful merger of these two entertainment behemoths would lead to higher prices, lower quality, and less content for film and television, harming movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and ultimately, audiences on every sofa and movie theater seat in the U.S.,” Bonta said in a statement on Monday.

The suit argues that the combined company will control 27% of the wide-release theatrical distribution market, 30% of the submarket comprising “anticipated blockbuster films,” and 27% of the basic cable bundle. The states argue that such consolidation will harm theaters and cable and satellite providers that rely on competition among distributors. Paramount and Warner Bros. are two of the five remaining legacy studios. Together, all five — including Disney, Sony and Universal — control 86% of theatrical distribution and 90% of blockbuster distribution, the states said. Warner Bros. and Paramount are also the second- and third-largest basic cable distributors, respectively.

[…] The states are expected to seek an injunction to block the transaction, which Paramount expects to close sometime after July 22. The 12 states in the coalition are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington. […] All are represented by Democratic attorneys general.
“Consolidation here not only leads to higher prices — it also leads to fewer opportunities for important stories to come to life, and fewer ways for audiences to encounter stories, ideas, and perspectives beyond their own experiences,” Bonta said. “In this country, no one is above the law. With this lawsuit, California and our sister states are fighting for free and fair markets, not rigged markets. America has no kings in government or our economy.”

Re:Let it burn

By bussdriver • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

1. Blockbuster films help fund other films and a lot of people like them enough to have them make money or crash and burn a ton of cash… They shouldn’t succeed simply because they have a 30% marketing budget which is ridiculous because of the film’s pile of money.

Yes, it makes bland stuff to appeal to the lowest common denominator and they don’t have to run their business on massive bets; perhaps if people were not such gullible consumers?? FX doesn’t draw people in as much…
Also, those expensive films pay a lot of people to make them although a ton of money is not going to the FX people. The bankable movie stars get too much for their brand. That is on the public… The big unspoken cost is the business managers who take massive profits while probably encouraging the hate on the stars they resent having to pay high wages to. They are also trying to replace every writer, artist, and actor with AI so they can keep all the money for themselves. Think it’s bad now? Wait until they have zero push back from their interference which is the biggest reason films suck today. The formula committee and exec producer created shit that ruined everything is going to have a suck up AI following orders… not sneaking around the system to add memorable scenes to Forest Gump disobeying the bean counter’s “artistic” vision.

2. Cable TV is not great and they make you buy channels you don’t watch (or hate or are actively destroying the USA.) but the cable model with ads funded tons of TV shows that were good and had niche markets. Now the whole business model is shot, TV shows of the past are not possible; just some on broadcast TV or the HBO model (also might die.) Youtube shows make no money and have to beg for donations just to fund a tiny staff without stability or capacity to produce much. So now you have tons of choice and is it really cheaper?? I know people who pay as much or more now than before and they don’t rave about quality improvement - plus they admit to watching a lot of old content from before “modernization.”

The real problem: People are overly entertained. We are amusing ourselves to death. You shouldn’t see so many videos that everything is a rehash. That said, if you pick the best of every plot or genre, we don’t need any more new content if you consumed it in moderation. One thing I’ve noticed in decades in education is that we have far fewer people with actual hobbies. Pure consumption is not a hobby. Get a hobby and you won’t have time to see all this content slop… and it was slop before AI started learning the patterns that was turning it into slop already.

Re:What about Netflix?

By The-Forge • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

At this point they see Netflix as the way lesser of 2 evils.

Re:Translation

By machineghost • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Do you have any non-propaganda, unbiased evidence whatsoever that consolidating into fewer companies will in any way result in greater production of creative works?

Because if not, perhaps you should consider the possibility that the statement you quoted isn’t actually propaganda (it’s just a statement of fact).

Re:Let’s see

By jonwil • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Its all about making sure that CNN ends up in the hands of a Trump ally who will turn it into a Fox News clone and destroy a major thorn in the side of Trump and the republicans. Anything else that might happen is secondary to that.

Re: Let it burn

By karmawarrior • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

“These days”

They’ve all been engineered since Heaven’s Gate bombed, and certain franchises have always been engineered. There was even a book on how to write generic blockbuster, called Save The Cat!, that became an industry bible in the early 2000s, with scripts being rejected if they didn’t follow the formula, which gave a page by page description of what needed to be there.

But… complaining they’re engineered is like complaining that rollercoasters are engineered. Nobody goes into a MCU or Bond or even a John Wick movie expecting some amazing piece of meaningful artistry. Hell, if they did, the number of people interested in them would reduce dramatically, because the last thing most of us want to do after writing Java for 5 days and trying to relax on a Friday evening is to think. People want fun escapism sometimes, because life right now sucks more than it’s done in 30 years for most people.

“Are they worth saving?” So you’re telling me that you feel that giving a group of billionaires more control over what you watch and what information you get because you don’t see any cultural or entertainment value in The Beekeeper? That’s your argument?

Really?

Apple Reportedly Agreed to Intel Chips To Avoid White House Tariffs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
According to the Wall Street Journal (paywalled), Apple agreed to use Intel’s U.S. chipmaking plants after White House officials pressured Tim Cook during tariff-relief talks last summer. MacRumors reports:
In August 2025, Apple CEO Tim Cook was in Washington to lobby the Trump administration to drop its proposed 100 percent tariff on semiconductor imports — a levy that would have raised costs across Apple’s product line. Apple reportedly secured an exemption after pledging to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S., although many of those investments were already planned. During the meetings, president Trump and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick are said to have urged Cook to use Intel’s fabrication plants to make some of Apple’s chips. The link between the tariff talks and the Apple-Intel deal had not been previously reported.

Almost a year later, Trump announced via his Truth Social platform that Apple would begin using Intel-made chips in some products. “We need to design and build our Chips right here in America,” the president posted. The news sent Intel shares to record highs. According to a person familiar with the negotiations cited by the WSJ, Apple plans to have Intel make chips for both Mac laptops and iPhones. The report doesn’t say which chips or in what volume, and Apple is expected to remain reliant on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC, for the majority of its custom silicon.

If only

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Informative Thread

There was some sort of… its been so long, whats that stuff called? Oh yeah, legislation! What if there was sort of legislation that funded and support domestic semiconductor fabrication and all the precursor stuff needed for it?

Whats that? There was?

Wonder what happened? Oh yeah, it was picked apart and kind of left to rot. I’m sure gladhanding and handshake deals with the President will be just as good.

Beyond Natcast’s discontinuation (and the apparent termination of the NSTC itself), the Industrial Advisory Committee has been disbanded, the National Advanced Packaging Manufacturing Program is not active,4 the new semiconductor-focused Manufacturing USA Institute has been discontinued, and the Consortium Steering Committee has not met since the change of administration.5 As these activities are mandated by the CHIPS Act, it is not clear how Commerce intends to comply with the Act without substantially increasing staff — at odds with the administration’s push for smaller government. From the outside, the new CHIPS R&D vision appears more like a profit-driven investment program than a provider of core infrastructure benefiting all participants and prioritizing American national and economic security.

https://www.factorysettings.or…

Re:TSMC is promising new fabs in the USA

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Informative Thread

promising is they keyword here. Fabs take years to build and the USA isn’t exactly a reliable trading partner.

Apple already using TSMC chips made in the USA

By drnb • Score: 5, Informative Thread

promising is they keyword here. Fabs take years to build and the USA isn’t exactly a reliable trading partner.

I think “current status” is the key phrase here. From Google:

“TSMC’s massive $65 billion Phoenix, Arizona, project is rapidly expanding into a “gigafab” cluster. The first fab has been in production since late 2024 using 4nm process technology. Construction on the second fab is complete, with equipment installation underway ahead of an accelerated 2027 production target for 3nm chips

Fab 1: High-volume production of 4-nanometer (N4) chips is actively supplying major U.S. customers like Apple and NVIDIA.

Fab 2: The physical building structure is complete. Equipment installation is slated for 2026, with high-volume production of 3-nanometer (N3) chips targeted for the second half of 2027.

Fab 3: Groundbreaking and structural topping ceremonies are complete, with this facility slated to utilize even more advanced 2nm and A16 process technologies.

Future Expansion: TSMC has acquired additional land and laid the groundwork for up to six fabs plus research and development facilities”

Re:Apple already using TSMC chips made in the USA

By anoncoward69 • Score: 4 Thread
It’s dumb as shit. The US makes almost nothing of significance. So we’re going to make the chips here, ship them all the way to China so they can put them in an iPhone, then ship the completed iPhone all the way back to the US again?

Re:If only

By ClickOnThis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

this seems a case where Trump actually acted in (in his judgement) the country’s best interests.

It might happen, but I’m not sure you can say it was Trump’s judgement that got us there. Seems to me he acts in self-interest almost exclusively, except for his kids and close friends. And even then it seems transactional. If it benefits someone else as well, that’s a collateral effect.

“America First” has been his rallying cry, but by word and deed he seems to think “Trump first.”

Cloudflare Precursor Watches Your Mouse and Keyboard To Decide If You Are Human

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
BrianFagioli writes:
Cloudflare has launched Precursor, a new behavioral bot detection system that monitors mouse movement, typing cadence, scrolling, clipboard activity, page visibility, and other signals across an entire browsing session. The system is designed to catch advanced bots that can run JavaScript, use real browsers, and pass traditional CAPTCHA challenges. Cloudflare says Precursor does not record actual keystrokes and instead studies timing and rhythm. The company also says the data is not tied to user identities or persistent profiles. Even so, software that watches how people move and type throughout a visit raises privacy concerns, especially as Cloudflare claims bots now generate roughly 57 percent of all Internet requests.

Re: People do the same.

By clive27 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Sounds incredibly easy for bots to add some randomness to its movements and typing speed.

Re:whitelist sites that don’t use Cloudflare

By Rujiel • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This overlooks the spam traffic coming from cloudflare. Also cloudflare was an actual intelligence project (quoted here):

https://www.devever.net/~hl/cl…

“Back in 2003, Lee Holloway and I started Project Honey Pot as an open-source project to track online fraud and abuse. The Project allowed anyone with a website to install a piece of code and track hackers and spammers. We ran it as a hobby and didn’t think much about it until, in 2008, the Department of Homeland Security called and said, ‘Do you have any idea how valuable the data you have is?’ That started us thinking about how we could effectively deploy the data from Project Honey Pot, as well as other sources, in order to protect websites online. That turned into the initial impetus for CloudFlare.”

Re:Chrome only, I assume

By higuita • Score: 4, Informative Thread

you know that these features already exist in javascript and are commonly used to monitor user behavior, either for ads or for study how you interact with sites?!

https://developer.mozilla.org/…

the only difference here is that this is being used to check for bots and cloudflare announced it… most other companies use this and do not announce it

Re:Cloudflare is malware/spyware

By PPH • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

and if you disable javascript, most site will actually not work

And in the final analysis, that might be a good thing. Did you (your company) write that JavaScript? Probably not. You downloaded some crap from npm and included it in your pages.

IIRC, it was some npm installation scripts that allowed a “dependencies” section to include a URL for code to be included. From anywhere in the Internet. Bypassing the repository. And allowing the owner to place new code at that location any time they saw fit. Some of the exploits did things like encrypt your disk and ransom your data. Or steal your BitCoin wallets. Or AI development system tokens.

But quite a bit of low level stuff gets snuck into these repositories. Including stuff that lies quietly, damaging nothing. But inserting tracking code into your pages for the benefit of unknown third parties. So, no. I won’t be loading your web pages along with a bunch of code that I don’t know what it does. And neither do you.

I use umatrix and while i allow cloudflare javascript for captchas

CloudFlare got caught (by my ISP) for using a web site that was widely considered to be a scam site. I did a search on the URL and read a bunch of “interesting” reports on it. Including an email that Google had sent in response to the blocking, pleading with ISPs to stop it. Why was Google apologizing for ClownFlare’s f*ck-up? My best guess is that they had piggybacked their own tracking stuff onto CFs Captchas. You just can’t trust anyone who uses JavaScript anymore.

Re:From the article it’s just browser fingerprinti

By BeaverCleaver • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Did anyone mention recently that simultaneously controlling both the most popular web browser and several of the most popular ad-supported web properties might be a little anticompetitive, and that it’s about time that Google was broken up? It’s probably time for that drum to start beating a bit louder again.

I remember when Microsoft got hit with an anti-trust suit because they bundled the browser with the OS. Here in 2026 Google owns the browser, the OS and the search engine. If you’re on a chromebook or a Pixel they also control the hardware. Why is this allowed?