Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Three Cities, 16 Years And $1 Billion Later, ‘Defiant’ Lucas Museum of Narrative Art Opens To Mixed Reviews
  2. Why Google Told Drivers to Drive a Longer Way On Purpose
  3. Does Brave Browser Load Faster Than Chrome, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge?
  4. Switzerland’s Federal Government Tests Open-Source Alternatives to Microsoft on 3,000 Computers
  5. Instead of Fighting AI, Some Teachers Work It Into Their Lessons
  6. A Man Charged His EV at a Dealership - and Was Billed $418
  7. ‘She Lost Her Sight. Her Billionaire Father Bet On a Daring New Treatment.’
  8. ‘The Jobs Apocalypse Is Postponed. An AI Jobs Boom Is Here’
  9. Bitcoin-based Liquid Network Says $320 Million Withdrawn in Hack
  10. Roku’s 24/7 AI Slop Channel Is Even Worse Than Expected
  11. US Military Disables Ad Trackers On Devices To Protect Troops
  12. Where a Massive Solar Storm Could Take Down the US Power Grid for Millions
  13. TiVo Will Start Charging Fees For Its Automatic Commercial Break-Skipping Feature ‘SkipMode’
  14. Flock Offered Webinar Teaching Cops How to Surveil ‘No Kings’ Protesters
  15. UN Votes To Encourage Map Projections More Accurately Reflecting the True Size of Continents

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Three Cities, 16 Years And $1 Billion Later, ‘Defiant’ Lucas Museum of Narrative Art Opens To Mixed Reviews

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It looks like a spaceship hovering over South Los Angeles, writes CNN, with futuristic tube-like elevators and an exhibition of Banksy murals. There’s a room featuring Luke Skywalker’s X-34 Landspeeder, but in its gardens there’s a 19th-century cast of a sculpture showing David conquering Goliath — and then a bronze statue of Princess Leia strangling Jabba the Hutt with a chain. Next to Rosie the Riveter. CNN argues it’s the museum’s message that “all forms of art and mythology on display here — from comic book illustrations and ‘Star Wars’ concept art to Impressionist masterpieces and reproductions of the Sistine Chapel — are worthy of equal consideration within the long arc of human history.”
More than 16 years after first proposing a cultural institution dedicated to visual storytelling, filmmaker George Lucas and his wife, businesswoman Mellody Hobson, will open their long-awaited museum in Los Angeles on September 22. The project made two false starts — plans to construct it in San Francisco and Chicago were both eventually abandoned — and has cost Lucas around $1 billion of his own money to build… Inside, visitors will find a significant slice of Lucas’ private collection, amassed over five decades and spanning art, costumes, movie props and memorabilia, with more than 1,300 objects currently displayed across 30 galleries…

Many fans will come for the “Star Wars” vehicles and sculptures of Yoda and Grogu, but the sci-fi mega-franchise only occupies about 7% of the museum. Lucas and Hobson are betting those visitors will stay for artworks by Frida Kahlo and Norman Rockwell, photographs by Gordon Parks, comics by Frank Miller and Cowboy Bebop anime, which will be screened in one of two theaters alongside early silent movies, Lucas’ own student films and productions by famed historical artists like Man Ray… [M]ajor art institutions like New York’s Museum of Modern Art and London’s Tate Britain have reconsidered the cultural canon by rehanging their permanent collections, exhibiting overlooked or marginalized artists alongside more widely celebrated names. The Lucas Museum appears to follow a similar philosophy, contending that the gravitas of an artwork is not just determined by its display in space but by what it’s in dialogue with. Lucas has even called his namesake museum “a temple to the peoples’ art,” elevating the work of illustrators and other underappreciated art forms…

The museum defines narrative art as any art that tells a story, and, moving through the space, one feels the enormity of the task of organizing and presenting such a broad vision… The open-plan, curvilinear design means the galleries are not fully divided, reinforcing the all-encompassing nature of the collection, though altogether the vast array of exhibits sometimes struggle for cohesiveness. Disjointed curation may reflect turbulence in the museum’s management ahead of the opening. Last April, former director and CEO Sandra Jackson-Dumont departed, with Lucas himself assuming responsibility for “content direction.” A month later, the museum laid off 15 full-time and seven part-time staff before chief curator Pilar Tompkins Rivas resigned in December, with no replacement planned…

After failing to secure a site in San Francisco, Lucas faced public opposition and a lawsuit in Chicago, with nonprofit Friends of the Parks arguing that his lakefront proposal would essentially privatize public land. Amid the delays and setbacks, simply opening the museum may feel like a victory to its founders.
Lucas’s wife said she’d watched the awe-inspiring activity of genius at work, reports Variety. “And he was fanatical at times, but the thing about a fanatical person is they’re a fan. He was a deep fan of these illustrators in this work, and he wanted them to be represented, and I became a deeper fan of his.”
Hobson teared up as she continued, “I was a fan already, but I saw something, the inspiration, the unwillingness to compromise, the determination, the lack of sleep, the lack of rest, the doggedness that actually taught me so much more than I ever could have imagined.” The museum, which features 1,200 pieces from Lucas’s private collection, has been in the works for about 20 years… “I thought I was tough. I thought I was strong, I thought I had a will, and then I saw George, and I was like, ‘Oh, that’s why you could only do six of those movies,’" Hobson said. “Any more would have killed you.”
Artforum magazine notes the museum received “mixed reviews” before its September 22 opening:
The billion-dollar, 300,000-square-foot museum, which opens to the public on September 22, encompasses 100,000 square feet of gallery space housing the collection of Lucas and Hobson. Intended to highlight storytelling in art, it presents the work of comic book artists John Romita Sr. and R. Crumb, illustrators Maxfield Parrish and Norman Rockwell, and fantasy painters Boris Vallejo and Frank Frazetta alongside masterworks by Artemisia Gentileschi, Lucas Cranach the Elder, and Pieter Brueghel the Younger, as well as Mary Cassatt, Frida Kahlo, and John Singer Sargent. All the works on display were chosen for their ability to tell a story, frequently in a single frame, Hobson told members of the press on September 2…

“Some visitors may be scandalized by the collision of so-called ‘high’ and ‘low,’" wrote Min Chen in Artnet News. “But there’s something liberating about watching those hierarchies collapse, seeing the breadth of human creativity arrayed beyond the bounds of genre or canon.” Notably, most of the works appear without didactics, which is intentional. “We’re encouraging people to have their own individual encounters with works of art and take away what they feel like speaks to them,” Lucas told The Guardian.

The tactic did not land for everyone. “Without [didactics], I left the Lucas without a clear sense of how the museum is positioning itself or, frankly, without learning much about anything beyond what I already knew....” wrote Maximiliano Durón in Artnews. “The Museum of Narrative Art lacks any kind of narrative.” Mary McNamara of the Los Angeles Times was unfazed by the lack of information, calling the institution "gutsy” and “defiant.”

“Critics will roar,” wrote McNamara, “but the Lucas Museum is a win for ‘the people’s art.’"
Even the museum’s web site is a visual extravaganza (and impossible to scroll). Reportedly there’s two restaurants, including the rooftop Skywalker Grill, which offers offering everything from striped bass and ragu bolognese to lobster corn dogs and Skywalker ranch Waygu burgers.

Why Google Told Drivers to Drive a Longer Way On Purpose

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A team at Google’s research arm used Google Maps to reroute a small portion of drivers in 10 U.S. cities,” reports SFGate — including San Francisco and Los Angeles.

“Through their experiment, which was published in the journal Nature Cities in June, the researchers sought to evenly spread traffic down more corridors as the drivers head to similar destinations, in the hopes of reducing congestion.”
The experiments nudged up vehicle speeds by 2% on average on the congested roads, and shortened travel times by a modest 0.7%. Scientists have long thought that traffic could be eased this way, and this now demonstrates how it could actually work in the real world.

The researchers collected data on weekdays in the 10 cities, which included Seattle, Salt Lake City, Chicago and Atlanta. While they studied a variety of types of roads, from city streets to highways, they found that in cities such as Los Angeles where they targeted highways, their diversions had the biggest effect, with driving speeds in those areas increasing by about 4.6%. Most cities, though, saw a smaller improvement with speeds across them increasing by just 0.5% during peak times. The Google study’s findings confirm what other researchers have long suspected, said Michael Manville, a professor of urban planning at UCLA who was not involved in the study. “This is a pretty nice empirical illustration of a longstanding idea,” he said. If a clogged traffic artery is on the verge of a long delay, he said, rerouting a small number of vehicles away from the bottleneck produces a “not gigantic but noticeable result....”

As with other traffic interventions, there’s a risk that Google’s approach to spreading traffic could backfire. This concept, known as “induced demand,” also applies to efforts like adding a lane to a critical highway, which temporarily relieves congestion, until traffic rises again. “You can do this, but you cannot be too successful, because if you are too successful, then more people will start driving, and essentially you’ll be back to ground zero,” [said Alexandre Bayen, a co-author of the study and director of UC Berkeley’s Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society]. “That’s why when we did the study, we only operated at the margin.” The idea is to make minor improvements, enough to matter in the aggregate but not so significant that people notice and start driving more, canceling those improvements…

The Google Research study also considered the potential environmental benefits of its traffic improvements. The paper highlights the carbon dioxide emission reductions resulting from the slightly smoother traffic flow and shortened travel times, which add up to a savings of about 1,000 metric tons annually. That’s equivalent to the emissions of about 200 vehicles, a drop in the bucket for cities with millions of cars, the majority of which are still gas guzzlers, even in San Francisco and LA. Bayen acknowledges that while emphasizing the cumulative benefit if such efforts were sustained for a longer time. For Manville, the study is a useful proof of concept. “It is a demonstration that if we managed roads better, air would probably be cleaner,” he said.
According to the article, “Google’s study might not just be a one-off, and city officials could decide to make use of the Google research findings, Bayen said, such as by trying to improve traffic congestion on a larger scale…”

“Google declined SFGATE’s requests for comment on whether the company informed city authorities or rerouted drivers about the study,” the article points out.

Experiencing this firsthand

By fjo3 • Score: 3, Informative Thread
Had this happen three times in the last month or two in Northern California. As long as I follow the new route strictly, I usually get there at about the same time I would have otherwise, but with a brand new view of the cityscape / rural landscape. Went for a nice river drive last week, 10/10 so far.

Induced demand

By Sneftel • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

As with other traffic interventions, there’s a risk that Google’s approach to spreading traffic could backfire. This concept, known as “induced demand,” also applies to efforts like adding a lane to a critical highway, which temporarily relieves congestion, until traffic rises again. “You can do this, but you cannot be too successful, because if you are too successful, then more people will start driving, and essentially you’ll be back to ground zeroâ¦"

Oh fuck all the way off.

This idea of “induced demand” always comes up in the context of traffic improvements, as though the goal of traffic design is to keep people from driving. (We had a sale on apples, and everyone bought our apples! Damn this counterintuitive induced demand!) Add a bypass and now it’s full of cars? Good! That was the whole point: to help people live where they want to live and get to where they want to get to. Every car making up that new traffic jam is being driven by someone who is, on balance, willing to sit through it because of the positive effects it’s had on them.

You can point to pollution and carbon emissions and freeways splitting communities, of course. There are plenty of reasons not to want more roads, and plenty of reasons to want to force people to adopt different living habits than they want to. But if that’s your aim, at least be honest about it.

induced demand is not a valid reason to not build

By 2TecTom • Score: 3 Thread

Induced demand does not mean that building roads never reduces congestion; new capacity can provide substantial and sometimes lasting benefits. Rather, it means that traffic responds to changes in the cost and availability of road travel, just as traffic can decrease when road capacity is reduced through people changing routes, times, destinations, modes, or simply making fewer trips.

Commuting to/from work with google?

By 0xG • Score: 3 Thread

If you use google to find your way to work and home, you have truly drunk the kool-aid.

Does Brave Browser Load Faster Than Chrome, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Brave web browser published a new round of benchmarks claiming its desktop browser uses less system resources than Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Firefox — and also loads pages faster. The blog Linuxiac reports:
According to Brave’s testing, the browser used 44% less CPU, 28% less memory, and 10% less energy on average compared with the three competing browsers. It also completed page loads 20% faster while transferring 26% less inbound data and 39% less outbound data…

- Brave averaged about 33% CPU usage, while Chrome used 47%, Edge 53%, and Firefox 78%.

- For memory, Brave used about 1.2 GB, compared to 1.75 GB for Chrome, 1.62 GB for Edge, and 1.65 GB for Firefox.

By stopping ads, analytics scripts, tracking pixels, and other third-party requests from loading, the browser has less network traffic and less work to do. In page-loading tests, Brave took about 4.4 seconds to fully load a page. Chrome took 5.1 seconds, Firefox 5.3 seconds, and Edge 6 seconds. However, when measuring Largest Contentful Paint, which is when the main content appears, Brave and Chrome both averaged about 2.4 seconds, with Edge and Firefox just behind at 2.5 seconds. This means Brave’s main advantage comes after the main content is visible, since there are fewer background ads, trackers, analytics requests, and delayed scripts to process.

Who cares

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It is fast enough. The thing that counts is that Brave has very good ad-blocking and that is far more important.

Who cares?

By topham • Score: 3 Thread

I opened my browser 3 months ago.

What a waste

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

I want my CPU usage at 100% I paid full price for it.

Switzerland’s Federal Government Tests Open-Source Alternatives to Microsoft on 3,000 Computers

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Switzerland has a population of 9,154,242. And its federal government just launched a pilot program to test open source alternatives to Microsoft 365 on 3,000 workstations, reports the blog It’s FOSS. “That’s about 7% of the federal workforce.”
The target is to complete the migration by end of 2027… On September 3, 2026, the Federal Council published results of “PoC BOSS”, a feasibility proof-of-concept involving 172 federal employees who tested the openDesk suite, a German open-source collaboration platform. During the proof-of-concept phase, core office tasks like document processing and email received positive assessments, while large-scale video conferencing still showed technical limitations. Based on the ‘success’ of the PoC phase with 172 employees, the pilot is now launched for 3,000 employees…

According to Matthias Stürmer, professor at the Bern University of Applied Sciences, Microsoft’s supremacy in public institutions poses three problems that are driving this migration. First is the risk of foreign access. US cloud legislation could expose Swiss government data to foreign authorities. Second is the risk to service continuity, as dependency on a single foreign vendor creates operational risk. The third risk is the escalating costs as proprietary licensing fees are rising with no Swiss leverage.

Switzerland’s military cybersecurity unit, Cyber Command, is not waiting for the civilian pilot. It is already poised to replace Microsoft 365 entirely with openDesk by October 2026. It is pretty much the same reason. Military doesn’t want foreign governments accessing sensitive Swiss data.
The article notes that during the pilot phase, the new system runs in parallel with Microsoft 365 rather than replacing it. But the article’s author speculates that “If the pilot is successful, we might expect the migration to continue on all the 54,000 workstations owned by the federal administrations.”

We actually looked at it

By rainer_d • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Installed it, looked at the components.

While it’s technically open-source, to make it usable beyond a simple proof of concept, you need to pay for a lot of “pro” stuff that requires a license.

I have no idea what it costs, but I doubt it will turn out cheaper as Microsoft.

Currently, it does not look like it’s multi-tenant. So you need a full installation for every customer.

Re:We actually looked at it

By robot5x • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

‘Core Suite’ is fully open source and would cover most day to day needs of ‘non-enterprise’ users: files (Nextcloud), office editing (Collabora Online), email/calendar (Open-Xchange), chat/video (Element/Jitsi), project management, wiki, etc.

‘Enterprise Edition’ does add paid operational features:

  • Automated user provisioning/deprovisioning and central rights management
  • Audit trails and administrative dashboards
  • Mail high availability/clustering and prioritised security patch channel
  • Some proprietary add-ons from upstream vendors (all of whom have solid FOSS products) (e.g., Element Server Suite Pro features, Open-Xchange Dovecot Pro, Nextcloud Enterprise admin/audit/Guard)

On cost, Schleswig-Holstein showed €15M/year licence savings vs a €9M one-off migration/infra investment, which sounds quite effective to me, but remember that cost is only one part of this stuff.

Reliability

By eskayp • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

Switzerland is taking reasonable precautions.
Under our current regime the USA can not be relied upon
on a day-to-day basis, let alone over the years.
That goes for our U.S. citizens as well as for foreign interests.
Rick Wilson, American Republican strategist said it well
just before Trump’s first election:
“Everything Trump touches dies”
Events since then have proven him right.
Especially regarding the United States.

National security

By dskoll • Score: 3 Thread

Relying on proprietary USA software or services is a national security risk for all non-USA countries. So good for Switzerland.

I wish my country (Canada) would start taking digital sovereignty seriously, but our government is so far down the MSFT rabbit-hole that I don’t hold out much hope we’ll ever disentangle ourselves until the USA does something draconian and then we’re really screwed.

The US better look into this too

By RitchCraft • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Microsoft is only looking out for Microsoft. Heck, just a few months ago we found out that Microsoft was using “proxy techs” in China for DoD tech support. ALL governments need to rethink how deeply they want Microsoft, or any other closed source tech company, within their ranks.

Instead of Fighting AI, Some Teachers Work It Into Their Lessons

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Last year the writing program at the University of Baltimore used an app that tracks students while they’re writing in Google Docs, offering teachers a video playing back revisions “with a scoreboard of all the edits, pastes and minutes spent on it,” writes the Washington Post. “Is it surveillance? Yes, I think obviously,” says the program’s director.

But was there a better way?
She is one of a dozen educators around the country who told The Post that they’re experimenting with a different approach to student use of generative artificial intelligence this school year. Teachers and professors are throwing out old assignments, installing new policies and protocols, and incorporating AI built for the classroom, rather than feeling forced to choose between returning to pencil and paper or acting like the AI police.

Her new lesson plan even incorporates generative AI in a controlled way to let her evaluate students’ critical thinking skills. She created chatbots using BoodleBox, the university’s AI vendor, that allow instructors to see both sides of the conversation. For an assignment testing students’ ability to make evidence-based arguments, they participate in a simulated school board meeting about banning books. It involves debating chatbots designed by Zeleny with names like the Confrontational Parent. Writing students usually turn in business proposals and research papers. This semester, instructors are starting to ask instead for transcripts of conversations a student had with a chatbot, a handwritten outline of their composition, and a video reflection of how they felt about the work. “In a lot of ways, we have made these assignments harder, but writing should have always had more detailed checkpoints along the way,” she said.

That’s the smart strategy

By Tablizer • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

because AI ain’t going away. Teachers will get their learning experiments wrong sometimes, but that’s par for the course for disruptive technologies.

Fools blindly trust or blindly distrust.

By drnb • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Hard to see the article as unbiased since the Washington Post is owned by one of the largest sells of AI services in the world.

You are working from a fallacy. Attacking the owner of a newspaper rather than the information.

Reality is that news organizations that are own by people you like, and people you dislike, will both lie to you at times, will both tell the truth at times. Which occurs is simply a matter of coincidence, of who the truth happens to coincidentally align with today. Sometimes that will be friends, sometimes that will be opponents.

So to find bias look at the information itself, from multiple sources. Then do your own research to see where the truth happens to lie. The con games of thieves and politicians and their surrogates only works if you blindly trust or blindly distrust.

And don’t be foolish and think if one side if lying the other is telling the truth, they may both be trying to manipulate you with lies.

Or AI is just a tool you need to learn how to use

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
AI is a tool. Whether it is good or bad depends on the person using it. Whether that person knows its limitations and flaws or blindly and foolishly trusts it. Used wisely by an informed person, AI can help with some tasks.

Computer literacy classes had to expand the curriculum to safely teach how to use the web, and email. It will need to do the same for AI.

All about their respective agenda, NOT the truth.

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

While I agree that both sides of the corporate political landscape lie, it is far from “simply a matter of coincidence”:

The coincidence is whether or not the policy aligns with the truth,

\Trump lies constantly (99.9% lies) …

I bet you go that number from the Democratic party, hint, it was not a day where politics aligned with reality. Now if you want to say that Trump says something dumb or misinformed 99.9% of the time I’d be more included to agree. However those dump, misinformed, mangled statements sometime actually align with policy representing the truth.

… and most of the Republican party still backs him up.

Sometimes it is that the underlying policy matches the truth, despite how mangled in its presentation. Sometimes it is the democrats have an even worse idea (back to that zero sum thinking, they are wrong so we must be correct).

The (corporate) Democrats prefer to obfuscate and only outright lie maybe 10-20% of the time. The progressives only lie by accident - which is why the oligarchs don’t back them and they have trouble getting elected.

Sorry, left, right, far left, far right, will all obfuscate and only outright lie when their desired policy does not match the truth. They are NOT new organizations, they are NOT historians, they are all organization that seek to MANUFACTURE a perception that will advance their political agenda. Its all about their respective agenda, NOT the truth.

Another truth is that they may (both or not) be trying to distract you with a non-issue, like the Culture Wars, distracting from real issues.

These wedge issue are manufactured, or if real do not get solved, because both sides raise money or turn out voters on election day thanks to them.

Re:Or AI is just a tool you need to learn how to u

By drnb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Yeah of course it’s a tool but I’m not convinced about its net societal value.

One obvious thing, a web search. It will probably scan more web sites than I would. The key here is that it should provide a comprehensive list of references. Just like a formal paper for school. Ask for one in the prompt.

A similar case for programmers is looking up stuff things that are in reference manuals or books. AI can save me time walking over to my bookshelf and looking up something Again, references are important.

I’ve done the latter and had good results. In particular I recalled a day at work many years ago where I had to repeatedly sort some data in a high performance environment (3D rendering during rotation). I knew the nature of the data (only minor changes between sorts). I went and found Knuth, looked up the algorithm that matches the data, looked at Knuth’s sample implementation, and implemented something for my project. In modern times I created a prompt asking for an algorithm matching the data and to provide a sample in a particular programming language. I find that AI reproduces what I found years ago.

Admittedly, big caveat here. This tends to work only with things heavily discussed in academic journals, textbooks, and other prrfessional engineering oriented publications. Start asking question outside suck heavily studied areas and you tend to get random things from stack overflow. Some good, some not.

But when students use it for assignments to gain advantage over others that are trying to learn, that’s not ok though.

I agree that students need to learn to do the work manually, to not be dependent upon AI. A common analogy being learning to do arithmetic with pencil and paper before moving to a calculator. But once we are testing students on their algebra, their physics, then we can allow them to use a calculator for any arithmetic involved. Similarly, at some point in college, an AI assisted spelling and grammar checker should be allowed. An AI assisted search for reference material. I’d point out that when I do a ‘word” search at a terminal in my university library I get different results than a public search on my personal computer using public searches. My onsite library search does a far better job at listing matches with the academic journals the university has. Perhaps an AI can help narrow the gap between onsite library and public searches. Note is at a finding references stage. An AI composing a student’s paper is an entirely different thing.

A Man Charged His EV at a Dealership - and Was Billed $418

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The EV blog Electrek reports:
A Clinton Township, Michigan man was charged $418 for a single EV charging session at Elder Hyundai’s Macomb Township store after finding the charger listed as publicly available on the EVgo app, but didn’t discover the charges until after wrapping up his 40-ish minute charging session. “I was flabbergasted,” explained Stanley Kpenkann, who had been driving a rented Chevy Bolt EV at the time. “Never in my wildest dreams did I think I would be saddled with a bill of $418 for a charging session.”

After calling EVgo to report the error, he found that the exorbitant charge wasn’t a mistake at all - Elder Hyundai was charging customers an eye-gouging $5 per kWh, plus another $5 for every minute connected.
A local news report notes that “After back-and-forth with EVgo, the company processed what it called a goodwill refund of $405.” (And the dealership argued their charger was reserved for its own customers and vehicles, so they set prices high to deter outside use.)

But Electrek argues the story “speaks to much larger problems among the EV charging business in particular and car dealerships in general…”
[In June] Plug & Play EV‘s Steve Birkett took to LinkedIn to call out his local Hyundai dealer in Union, NJ for charging a ridiculous $15 per kWh to top off his IONIQ 5 (!)… Even worse, he noted that a number of area dealerships that had listed their ports as “public” were actively discouraging public use with signs and stickers designed to turn people away…

[U]nlike gas stations, EV charge point operators in many states aren’t required to clearly advertise what they’ll charge before a driver plugs in in the same way that gas stations are: with clearly legible signage that’s visible from the street.

News Flash

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Car dealership ran by piece of shit.

Shocking not shocking

By rickb928 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If the dealership wanted to discourage public, non-customer use, they could post the fees and ward off those who would not pay $5 per minute PLUS kw charges. But, I suspect, this is just sharp practice, gouge them when they are not looking.

And why do I want to stick with hybrids?

This is a nothing burger.

By MikeDataLink • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The guy admits he saw the price on the screen and charged anyway.

Re:News Flash

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

A tip I picked up is that it’s cheap to charge up an EV at campsites

There are so many caveats to that idea:

1. Most campground owners don’t want you drawing 32A for hours. Their wiring infrastructure was designed with assumption it would only see the intermittent spikes in usage typical of an RV.
2. An EVSE plugged into a NEMA 14-50 outlet maxes out at 32A. Even with a car with a smaller battery pack (such as the Chevy Bolt in TFS) is going to be charging for hours depending on how much juice you’re trying to add. You may very well end up spending the night sleeping in the car.
3. Public L2 chargers are a thing (usually found at hotels, shopping centers, and parking garages) if you really don’t mind the slow charging speeds. A lot of them are cheap or sometimes even free.
4. DCFC is expensive, but generally still not as expensive as paying a campground fee. Just get an adapter if your car doesn’t already support NACS, and go to the nearest Tesla Supercharger that is open to non-Tesla EVs (most of them are at this point). You won’t have to worry about sketchy dealerships and their price gouging chargers.

Chargers for the customers and employees

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Car dealership ran by piece of shit.

No. A business has every right to put an EV charger outside for THEIR customers. For example a restaurant or a store. An employer putting up chargers for its employees.

However such a charger should be plainly identified as such with its signage, that it is for customers or employees not the public at large. Costco gas pumps need to see a Costco membership before pumping. EV chargers could do something similar to restrict to customers or employees.

‘She Lost Her Sight. Her Billionaire Father Bet On a Daring New Treatment.’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Billionaire Bill Ackman’s life was upended this February when his 26-year-old daughter collapsed in her Brooklyn apartment, suffering a brain hemorrhage that would render her unable to move, speak or see,” writes the Washingon Post. But then…
The hedge fund manager did what any good father would do — at least, any father with vast financial resources and what friends describe as a “Mr. Fix-It” tendency. He sprung into action, getting her topline care at New York City’s Mt. Sinai Hospital and consulting a network of well-connected friends all over the world. He helped her access a novel cell therapy that has been gaining traction among longevity enthusiasts, who are seeking ways to prolong human life. And then — motivated by a newfound desire to accelerate scientific research — he vowed to spend more than $400 million to launch an institute dedicated to longevity and brain health… He posted this week that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in May, gave his daughter Lucy’s medical team a first-time emergency authorization to transplant mitochondria — the energy-producing part of human cells — from her leg muscle to her eyes, in the hopes that the tiny cell powerhouses would facilitate healing in her optic nerves and perhaps even restore her vision.

Ackman’s story highlights the increasingly prominent role of the ultra-wealthy in making expensive medical bets on longevity treatments and other novel therapies, altering the direction of research as federal funding for science declines in the second Trump administration. But his saga is a deeply personal one, spurred by his daughter’s medical crisis. The focus on longevity by Ackman, who made billions on Wall Street as a hedge fund manager, is aligned with similarly ambitious efforts from some of Silicon Valley’s biggest names. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has backed Retro Biosciences, a start-up whose goal is to add 10 healthy years to the human lifespan through cellular reprogramming. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is reportedly a funder of Altos Labs, which focuses on cellular rejuvenation and resilience… Billionaire investor Peter Thiel, Google co-founder Sergey Brin and Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison are also deeply invested in life-extension methods and attempts to rewrite the biology of aging…

The therapy given to Ackman’s daughter Lucy, known as mitochondrial transplantation, is of great interest not only to people who have suffered injuries, but to longevity-focused scientists who believe that mitochondria may hold promise for reversing some of the effects of aging… In recent years, scientists have discovered that mitochondria have many other functions beyond converting food into energy. They serve as clearinghouses for damaged cells, opening up the possibility that they can help with cell regeneration and healing, said Daria Mochly-Rosen, professor of chemical and systems biology at the Stanford University School of Medicine and co-author of " The Life Machines: How Taking Care of Your Mitochondria Can Transform Your Health.”

“I am one of those who believes that focusing on mitochondrial health is a way to address many human diseases, including aging itself,” she said. “It’s exciting.”

Do we need to infect the children of the 1%

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Because if the only way we can get the money to cure diseases, then I wonder will this start to happen?

Have a rare disease? Only hope is for you to and intentionally infect the son/daughter of the wealthy.

The entire idea of taxes is to take the money from all - including the wealthy - and use it for the common good. We should NOT have to pray the wealthy becomes interested enough to do it on their own.

Allocation of resources

By Njovich • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Of course, doing a large investment in health research is by itself a good thing. However, having just 1 person decide vast amounts of allocation of where our top experts spend their time ultimately means that those experts will spend less time on other items. Medical research expertise is a finite resource and letting a couple of rich people hoard it instead of deciding as a society where we want to invest in them ultimately is not efficient.

Random thoughts

By Woeful Countenance • Score: 4, Informative Thread
* A stroke at age 26 is rare. Did she have an aneurysm, which could have been detected by CT, MRI, or angiogram?
* The question often asked in similar cases: Are “lifestyle choices” implicated?
* Apparently strokes in young people are “on the rise”.
* Wikipedia: “A long-time donor to Democratic candidates and organizations, Ackman endorsed Donald Trump in the 2024 United States presidential election. Ackman has been an active supporter of Israel, particularly following the October 7 attacks, and has criticized the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses.”
* "Shortly after midnight on Feb 6, Mr Ackman was woken by his eldest daughter, Eloise, who had found Lucy unconscious .... Mr Ackman later determined from data recorded on his daughter’s Oura ring that the haemorrhage had probably occurred at about 9am the previous day ....” Didn’t she have any symptoms? A hemorrahgic stroke is typically accompanied by a severe headache and cognitive symptoms.
* “Six months later, Mr Ackman said she had recovered her cognition and could understand her circumstances.” (ibid)
* “The hedge fund billionaire and his wife, Neri Oxman, have given 10 million shares in his firm, Pershing Square, to the couple’s freshly established Ackman Oxman Institute” (ibid) There are already longevity research institutes at university medical schools and research hospitals, but they don’t have Ackman’s name on them. And “The foundation is controlled by Mr Ackman and his wife, who share voting and investment power over its shares.”
* “The Oura Ring cannot currently detect a cerebral hemorrhage in real time .... Families and doctors have used Oura data after an unexpected medical emergency to review the timeline. … A sharp, unexplained drop in heart rate variability (HRV) or an abrupt spike in resting heart rate can help pinpoint the exact hour the body experienced acute trauma.”
* “Cognition and Movement: Lucy has regained full cognitive function, understands everything around her, and can walk short distances with assistance.” (from LinkedIn, so ....) Lucy needs some of that drug from the movie Lucy.
* “Experimental Treatment: She recently underwent an experimental mitochondrial transplant procedure — having healthy mitochondria extracted from her leg muscle and injected into her eyes — which briefly allowed her pupils to respond to light and perceive shadows, though the visual improvement faded after a few weeks.”
* Mister Language Person: from the Washington Post, story by Elizabeth Dwoskin: “He sprung into action”. So evidently the Washington Post has lost sight of the difference between past tense and past participle. They’ve previously eliminated a lot of copy editors (if not all). Maybe they’re using AI to check grammar now. Or not.

Looking for info related to the title?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The article hardly talks about it at all… mainly because it sounds like they might not have accomplished much. From TFA:

For the first few weeks, the treatment — an injection into her eyes — provided Lucy Ackman with a modicum of benefit. She regained the ability to perceive light, according to a paper that Putrino’s team has submitted to the journal Nature, but has not been peer-reviewed. The paper noted that it caused no harm to the eyes, which was important to measure since this was the first time it had been done in a person. After about a month, the benefit appeared to wear off.

“We are working on a method to inject her eyes with more frequency,” Bill Ackman posted this week, adding that mitochondria “has amazing potential.”

I’d take the purported temporary “perceiving light” with a big grain of salt.

Re:Just think

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Fortunately ivermectin is the cure and I can buy it from Tractor Supply Co.

‘The Jobs Apocalypse Is Postponed. An AI Jobs Boom Is Here’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A new article about AI in The Economist argues that "Initial effects of the technology on employment look positive.”
Perhaps AI will eventually make many humans unemployable — but there is no sign of it yet. On September 4th the Bureau of Labour Statistics reported that the American economy added 162,000 jobs in August, far above expectations. The unemployment rate is just 4.1%, lower than in almost 90% of months over the past half-century. Young workers, often cast as AI’s first victims, are holding up remarkably well: the gap between unemployment among 20-24-year-olds and the overall rate is close to a multi-decade low.

Some companies and workers are being severely disrupted by AI. Hiring in professional and business services is running about 10% below the average in 2015-19. Tech giants like Microsoft and Meta are trimming headcounts as they reorganise their businesses around the technology. Smaller firms such as Block, the owner of Square and Cash App, and Intuit, the maker of TurboTax and QuickBooks, are replacing people with bots. American companies have announced some 16,000 AI-related job cuts a month on average so far this year, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas, an employment consultancy.

But AI-related lay-offs gets lost in the churning jobs market where employers shed roughly 1.7m workers in a typical month. And the evidence so far is that AI is already creating a lot of jobs to replace those it has destroyed. The vast sums pouring into data centres and power generation have set off a race for construction and infrastructure workers. AI startups are hiring like there is no tomorrow. Incumbents racing to keep up are creating new AI roles. And by making some workers more productive, AI may be increasing demand for their services.

Add it all up, and The Economist estimates that AI has so far created around 1m new jobs in America. That easily exceeds the roughly 200,000 lay-offs attributed to AI since mid-2023, and appears more than enough to offset weaker hiring in many back-office roles.
Their article acknowledges that since January 2023 employment has fallen roughly 10% for customer-service workers and 15% for administrative assistants. But when The Economist looked at professions “closest to the AI boom” — engineers, software developers, mathematicians and data scientists — they found that since 2022 they’ve added roughly 730,000 jobs above trend. They see AI as creating new white-collar jobs for everyone from model and deployment engineers to new data annotators.

The chief economist at the Burning Glass Institute agrees, estimating that roughly 1% of professional jobs are now “AI jobs” — about 1 million positions in the U.S. — while in computer occupations and life sciences it’s between 4% and 5%. (Data-center construction spending also increased 60% in one year, according to Census Bureau data, creating jobs for electricians, HVAC specialists, grid engineers, and machine technicians.) And “Indeed finds that installation and maintenance jobs at data centres advertise wages about 40% higher than comparable work elsewhere.”

Re:This makes my suspicion nipple tingle

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m not sure anything from the Bureau of Labour Statistics can be trusted right now. Given how blatant Trump has been at telling the Federal Reserve what he wants them to do, do you think some little pimple on the ass of the government like the BLS has got away without being meddled with?

It’ll take a few years, but it’ll become apparent that the “official” statistics or version of events deviates from the ordinary person’s experience pretty soon. Then the journey to the Dark Side (aka. banana republic) will be complete.

25% of U.S. workers are “functionally unemployed”?

By Paul Fernhout • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Hows this for more serious job market stats?
“Nearly 25% of U.S. workers are “functionally unemployed,” economic analysis finds”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/f…
        “The U.S. job market is less robust than it looks, according to a new analysis.
        The nation’s unemployment rate fell to 4.1% in July, well within the range economists consider healthy. Yet that measure, which reflects the percentage of people 16 and older who don’t have a job and who are looking for work, is an imprecise metric that fails to offer a full picture of the health of the job sector, according to Gene Ludwig, chairman of the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP).
        The economic research firm’s “True Rate of Unemployment” (TRU) seeks to capture the share of workers that the group defines as “functionally unemployed.” This includes not only people who are unemployed and looking for a job, but also those who are involuntarily working part-time and who are earning poverty-level wages, or less than $26,000 annually before taxes.
        Functional unemployment across the U.S. has climbed four straight months and stood at 24.9% as of July, although that’s down from 25.2% in December, according to the Ludwig Institute. …”

Shadowstats has some similar unemployment numbers:
https://www.shadowstats.com/al…

To me, these sorts of huge (but often ignored) unemployment numbers reflect the continued playing out of larger trends like I outlined in 2010:
“Beyond a Jobless Recovery: A heterodox perspective on 21st century economics”
https://pdfernhout.net/beyond-…
        “This article explores the issue of a “Jobless Recovery” mainly from a heterodox economic perspective. It emphasizes the implications of ideas by Marshall Brain and others that improvements in robotics, automation, design, and voluntary social networks are fundamentally changing the structure of the economic landscape. It outlines towards the end four major alternatives to mainstream economic practice (a basic income, a gift economy, stronger local subsistence economies, and resource-based planning). These alternatives could be used in combination to address what, even as far back as 1964, has been described as a breaking “income-through-jobs link”. This link between jobs and income is breaking because of the declining value of most paid human labor relative to capital investments in automation and better design. Or, as is now the case, the value of paid human labor like at some newspapers or universities is also declining relative to the output of voluntary social networks such as for digital content production (like represented by this document). It is suggested that we will need to fundamentally reevaluate our economic theories and practices to adjust to these new realities emerging from exponential trends in technology and society. …”

They fired most of the agency…

By acroyear • Score: 5, Informative Thread

…and since then, the jobs report has been notorious for having corrections weeks later that few notice. I won’t even say grain of salt. There’s little about this that will hold up.

Many jobs in hospitality were for the World Cup, and they were all temporary, part time, barely above minimum wage, and now done.

Re:25% of U.S. workers are “functionally unemploye

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

There’s a stat - I forget the name for it - but it’s basically “The percentage of hours worked out of all those who would normally be expected to be working”.

If you’re of working age, not prevented by disability, etc., you would be counted. It can’t be fudged by not counting people who have just given up, it can’t be fudged by counting part time employment. And you can combine that with the wage distribution curve, and then the wealth distribution curve to get a pretty good picture of the overall economic health of your population.

I’ve never heard of a government that wants that. Generally, economic reports are spun to make the government look more effective than it has been and to protect the wealthy against accusations of hoarding that might result in taxation. A really bad government might just give up on spin and, say, fire people who won’t just tell whatever lie they want.

Re:This makes my suspicion nipple tingle

By IDemand2HaveSumBooze • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Any additional jobs gained in construction of datacenters have to be temporary. Once you’re done constructing the datacenter, your job is finished. Unless you assume that the AI bubble keeps growing indefinitely and new datacenters will continuously keep getting built, but even in that case at some point you’ll run out of land.

Bitcoin-based Liquid Network Says $320 Million Withdrawn in Hack

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Reuters reports:
Liquid Network, a Bitcoin-based payments and settlement network, said on Sunday that about $320 million was withdrawn from its federation wallet in a hack. “Purported white-hat hackers” withdrew around 4,000 of the 4,200 bitcoin held in its Liquid Federation wallet, Liquid Network said in a post on X.
“Liquid wallets will be impacted,” their post concluded, adding “and we’re sorry for any inconvenience.”

Store of value

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
..mthebissue with being a store of value is that even if it’s so in principle it also needs to be secure in fact. Don’t hear a lot of stories about million in gold being stolen…

“Purported white-hat hackers”

By T34L • Score: 4, Funny Thread
IDK about whoever pwned them in this case, but I feel like my fashion choices could get hella flexible if they were in the way of a potential $320M. That’s enough to disappear real good.

Re:EPIC RESPONSE

By znrt • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

if i understand correctly what is meant is that transactions are stopped while they figure the mess out, not the loss of funds. indeed a serious inconvenience but i’m guessing it would fall into “force majeure” category.

Roku’s 24/7 AI Slop Channel Is Even Worse Than Expected

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A new streaming TV channel shows films made with genAI, reports Engadget. “Fairground AI Creator TV” is free — and supported with ads — describing its material as “AI Cinema”:
“AI-generated” can make it sound as though someone typed a sentence into a machine and came back five minutes later to find a finished movie. Fairground’s catalog shows why that description can be too simple. Take Lost Garden: The Awakening of the Lantern Knight. According to its Fairground page, creator Frank Houbre wrote the world, characters, mythology, emotional arc and screenplay himself. AI tools were used mainly for animation and visual production, with other tools helping create voices and music before the episode was assembled in conventional video-editing software.
There’s still one question, the article notes: “whether viewers actually want an AI-focused TV channel.” More than 100 AI creators have contributed to the 24-hour slate of programming, although Variety points out several of them were discovered on social media.

The channel was recently profiled in an article by the Guardian. Its headline? "‘Nightmare fodder’: Roku’s AI slop channel is even worse than expected.” (And its subheading calls it “a 24/7 channel devoted to low-quality AI content for viewers sick of watching real people move…”)
What about people who hate plot and vision and the sight of people speaking convincing dialogue that synchronises perfectly with the movement of their lips? What about the people who just want to watch an unyielding torrent of eerily weightless nightmare fodder? Well, good news. Roku has finally caught up… Early reactions were, to put it mildly, not great. The Verge compared it to eating from a trough, while Futurism called it “bottom-of-the-barrel slop”…

On the plus side, the channel is evidence that artificial intelligence has come on in leaps and bounds over the last couple of years… However, it is still awful. Categorically, catastrophically awful. The channel doesn’t so much offer shows as a drifting dreamscape of bad ideas rendered as horribly as possible with no thought paid to scheduling. At one point on Wednesday, a shrill high-frequency anime gave way to a long and staid German-language short about Nazi bureaucracy. After that came a sort of Gladiator ripoff that had all the dynamism of an exhibit you’d see at the fourth-best museum on a poorly planned family holiday.

Re:No shit

By Bentbob • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Roku was recently bought by Fox Corporation, so Roku is even more trash than their usual “Roku is trash”.

When people compare AI water use to golf

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Funny Thread

For those people who say AI datacentres water use is just a pittance of water use used to keep golf greens green, I’d like to remind you it’s far more pleasant being struck by a golf ball than watching even 5 minutes of this shit.

Re:When people compare AI water use to golf

By dr_blurb • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I’d like to add that it’s nicer if the view outside your window is of a golf course, and not a datacentre.

Re:In a few years it’ll be the only channel they n

By Rei • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

IMHO:

The good news is, gen AI lets anyone make a movie!

The bad news is, gen AI lets *ANYONE* make a movie.

AI generated

By Shakes Fist • Score: 4, Funny Thread
If it’s a young Kylie Minogue wielding a sword, attacking a giant snake in the forest with most of her clothing removed then “Yay! AI!”. Otherwise? Nah.

US Military Disables Ad Trackers On Devices To Protect Troops

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slashdot reader DeanonymizedCoward writes:
Reuters reports that the US Military is disabling ad tracking on devices, to prevent adversaries from buying publicly-available tracking data to assist in targeting troops. Military officials say that they have disabled trackers on a variety of computers and mobile devices, according to letters released on Friday by Sen. Ron Wyden, and following reports that commercially-available tracking data has been used to target troops in the Middle East....

Wyden said in a statement that it was clear that the military’s efforts “have not been effective at neutralizing this threat.” U.S. Representative Pat Harrigan, a North Carolina Republican, said that U.S. enemies “should not be able to pull out a credit card and buy information that helps them track American troops.” Rep. Harrigan remains silent as to the larger question of whether the general public should be able to pull out a credit card and buy information that helps them track anyone they please.
“The Pentagon said in an email it would respond to the lawmakers directly,” Reuters reports:
The Army said in a statement that advertising IDs had been blocked on Windows computers “since before 2021” but that Android and Apple mobile devices had only had it disabled by default “since at least February 2026....” The effort to reduce the location data generated by smartphones comes as military officials weigh increasingly strict restrictions on phone use overall. In July, Reuters reported that some deployed personnel in the Middle East could be ordered to surrender their phones amid concerns that mobile videos they were posting to the internet were helping Iran target American bases in the region.

Too many leaks, too few fingers

By WaffleMonster • Score: 5, Informative Thread

“According to cybersecurity experts, including the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), one of the most effective ways to mitigate data broker threats is to disable the unique advertising IDs built into smartphones. "

So all they are doing is turning off advertising IDs in the OS? …eh..... hmm.....

“Another possibility is that disabling the advertising ID is no longer a sufficient defense on its own, as data brokers can still capture, correlate, and monetize unique location data using other information collected from phones. "

Ding ding ding… we have a winner.

Re:What about the rest of us

By dsgrntlxmply • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Quod licet Iovi non licet bovi.

Re: Offtopic

By Bentbob • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Press the ' key on the keyboard

Re: Offtopic

By HiThere • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I think some folks are posting from things that have “smart quotes” turned on, and either don’t want to, or don’t know how to turn it off. Or they just don’t care.

Re:Offtopic

By YuppieScum • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

And you cannot like or dislike a post. What a relic.

Slashdot’s comment moderation system was introduced, IIRC, in 1999.

I suppose a system designed to limit the effect of bots and morons could be regarded as a relic, as it doesn’t “monetise engagement.”

On the other hand, “tell me you’ve never had mod points without telling me you’ve never had mod points.”

Where a Massive Solar Storm Could Take Down the US Power Grid for Millions

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A new study published Friday in AGU Advances “depicts the most advanced picture yet of how a rare but massive solar storm could affect some US industries and electric systems more than others,” reports CNN.

“During a 250-year solar storm, the East Coast would have widespread potential for grid failure.”
Researchers modeled what a Carrington Event — a 1-in-150-year geomagnetic storm or even rarer — could mean for the modern day. They estimate the US economy would lose about $1.5 billion to $2 billion per day from direct and indirect costs, as millions of people face power outages. The findings show the most vulnerable areas are the Northeast and the Northern Plains, especially locations at higher latitudes.

No one knows when the next big storm will hit. While the most severe geomagnetic storms are labeled as once-in-a-century or rarer, these events don’t follow a fixed schedule. “That timing only averages out on very long timescales,” said Anna Kelbert, a geophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, who was not involved in the study but previously studied solar storm effects on power grids. “The event can occur at any time, as soon as a week from now, or centuries later....” [Shawn Dahl, service coordinator at the Space Weather Prediction Center operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colorado], said the sun is now coming down from a period of heightened activity, which is also when some of the biggest storms to hit Earth have occurred in the past. “We still need a lot of work to be ready....”

“We haven’t really seen events like this size in the modern era, where we’ve had all of this high technology and we’ve had the power grid of this size,” said Ed Oughton, researcher at George Mason University and lead author of the new study… Because the US grid’s actual structure is proprietary for security reasons, the team used engineering models to create various network and transformer setups including the 10,464 substations and 16,256 transmission lines found across the country… The grid structure also contributes to higher risk in some areas. For instance, the eastern US is linked together in a single grid interconnection. A voltage issue in Maine, if not isolated early, could cascade through the grid to Washington, DC. The West works similarly, whereas the Texas interconnection operates mostly within the state…

Power is restored over time depending on any alternative electrical paths that could bypass the substation or availabilities of spare transformers, for instance. “This nationwide analysis shows that we are currently ill-prepared to face a major magnetic storm, and that the societal impacts would be catastrophic,” Kelbert said.
“The study estimates power disruptions for 5.1 million people and 135,000 businesses,” according to the article, and “The outages could last from hours to days to weeks depending on the damage and resources available to get back online, said Oughton.”

The Sun Could Wreck Our Grid and We’re Not Ready

By CustomBuild • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The part that bothers me here isn’t that a Carrington-scale storm could knock out the grid. We’ve known that for a long time. It’s that we seem to be counting on “restoration” as though replacing a damaged transformer is roughly equivalent to replacing a server. It isn’t. Some of these things are enormous, expensive, custom-built pieces of equipment with long lead times. If enough of them are damaged at once, there may not be a lot of spare capacity sitting around waiting to be plugged in.

And the interconnection issue is worth thinking about. We have spent decades making the grid more interconnected because that’s generally efficient and useful. But a system that is wonderfully efficient under normal conditions isn’t necessarily resilient when the disturbance is spread across an entire region. If Maine and Washington DC are ultimately part of the same electrical machine, “just isolate the problem” sounds a lot easier on paper than it might be at 2 AM during a once-in-a-century event.

What makes this particularly annoying is that this isn’t some exotic science-fiction threat. We can watch the Sun. We know roughly what kind of event we’re worried about. We know which parts of the grid are vulnerable. And we know that having some additional transformers, better monitoring, better procedures and a real emergency plan would cost money, but probably far less money than discovering after the fact that we didn’t have any of those things.

I’m not expecting the lights to go out tomorrow. But “it might happen next week or 200 years from now” is actually a pretty good argument for preparing now. You don’t buy a fire extinguisher because you know the date of the fire.

No use clinging to denial

By sacrilicious • Score: 4, Funny Thread

No one knows when the next big storm will hit. While the most severe geomagnetic storms are labeled as once-in-a-century or rarer, these events don’t follow a fixed schedule.

And now thanks to Intergalactic Warming, these storms will be bigger and even more frequent.

Fuck Carrington, what about Miyake?

By sarren1901 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I feel like Carrington gets all the attention because he was English and it was the last major observable storm. Thing is, a Miyake event would be 10x worse and we’ve yet to deal with one in modern times.

https://www.esa-spaceweather.n…

Has a really good read up on both events, their differences and the potential damage. Maybe Miyake is ignored because we literally can’t do fuck all about it because spending the money to actually have backup equipment is “inefficient”.

As it is, we are lucky we dodged a massive coronal mass ejection in 2012 by sheer luck. Had it happened a week earlier, Earth would of taken a direct hit.

Fortunately, we have …

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

… a decent system of solar observatories. So we will know if such a storm is coming. And that the massive outage is not just a result of my local power companies typical operations.

Re:The Sun Could Wreck Our Grid and We’re Not Read

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s that we seem to be counting on “restoration” as though replacing a damaged transformer is roughly equivalent to replacing a server. It isn’t.

The reason we’re counting on restoration is because the design of these systems protect critical equipment like transformers. We calculate fault levels, speed of rise levels and design systems to interrupt and protect critical infrastructure (at the expense of the customer’s connected). You’re not going to be replacing large transformers. You’re going to be replacing small scale control electronics in the substation. You’re going to be replacing countless single action fuses. You’ll be dealing with a few switchboard fires, hopefully isolated to a single feeders at a time so that a spare one at the end of the switchboard could be put back in operation. Then the big issue will be a black start.

The majority of the damage from the Carrington event was for telegraph equipment precisely because we already do a significant amount of electrical infrastructure protection, and we’ve gotten significantly better at this over the decades.

TiVo Will Start Charging Fees For Its Automatic Commercial Break-Skipping Feature ‘SkipMode’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
TiVo is notifying customers about changes to “one of its longest-standing and most popular DVR features,” reports the blog Cord Cutter News:
Starting November 2, 2026, the current version of SkipMode that allows users to jump over commercial breaks with a single button press on the remote will no longer be available. The company is instead preparing to test a new paid add-on called Premium Auto Commercial Skip.

SkipMode has been a core part of the TiVo experience for years. After a supported show finished recording, the service added markers that let viewers leap from the end of one program segment directly to the start of the next, bypassing the ads in between. On newer TiVo Experience 4 devices, users could even set the feature to automatic so commercials were skipped without any remote interaction. The feature was limited to popular prime-time programming on major networks, typically appearing a short time after a show aired.

Under the new plan, that one-button and automatic functionality will disappear from the standard service. Viewers will still be able to skip commercials the traditional way by using the 30-second skip button or the fast-forward control on their remotes. Those manual methods have existed on TiVo boxes for more than two decades and do not rely on the company’s commercial-detection data. In November, TiVo will offer a 30-day free trial of the new Premium Auto Commercial Skip service. After the trial ends, customers who want to keep the automatic or one-button skip capability will need to add it to their accounts for an extra monthly fee.

The company has not yet published the price.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader AmiMoJo for sharing the article.

Fine TiVo you have there. Shame something might ha

By coaxial • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They’re literally breaking their product and then ransoming it back to you for a monthly protection fee.

Enshitification is too kind of a word

Textbook Enshittification

By silentbozo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

* Provide a service that provides a great benefit (commercial skip) to get people hooked
* Build userbase based on this benefit
* Sue other people based on “infringement” of this feature
* Sell itself to a pure patent troll (Rovi) which then renames itself Tivo
* After model of extorting other companies over patent troll portfolio is exhausted, start extorting the customer base

https://www.yahoo.com/entertai…

“Rovi has aggressively pursued licensing deals and litigation for its patent portfolio, dating back to predecessor company Gemstar-TV Guide International. Rovi says it has more than 5,000 issued or pending patents worldwide, with intellectual-property licensing representing 54% of its total 2015 revenue.

According to Rovi, its patents are licensed by eight of the top 10 U.S. TV service providers, including AT&T, Time Warner Cable and Charter Communications.

On Thursday, Rovi said in an SEC filing that reached a deal with Time Warner Cable â" which is in the process of being acquired by Charter â" to extend its existing interactive program guide and patent licensing agreement. The pact, which was set to expire March 31, has been extended through Dec. 31, 2016.

Last year, Rovi suffered a rare legal defeat against Netflix, after a U.S. federal judge ruled that the five Rovi-owned patents at issue in Rovi’s lawsuit against the streaming-video company were invalid.

Rovi said it has not changed its financial estimates for 2016, which anticipated possible litigation with Comcast.

Separately, Rovi has reportedly been in talks to acquire DVR maker TiVo, which also has a sizable patent portfolio and won $1.6 billion to date from intellectual-property litigation.”

https://www.yahoo.com/entertai…

“t’s time to say goodbye, sort of, to the company whose pioneering DVR introduced consumers to time shifting and ad skipping. Some 17 years after it went public, TiVo just became a part of Rovi with the closing of a $1.1 billion cash and stock acquisition deal they made in May â" but with the buyer now adopting the TiVo name.”

Not paying

By markdavis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Yep, I got the Email yesterday. Unfortunately, I wasn’t shocked. TiVo was sold to another company and they are going to start trying to squeeze customers for more revenue as they become less relevant. But I am not going to pay extra for the feature I have had for many years. Besides, the skip function only works on less than half the content, anyway. It isn’t difficult to zoom through commercials manually.

I didn’t want to move to the “new experience UI” either, because it is just like all the streaming devices with their HUGE graphics and crazy navigation. The old UI is much easier, faster, and logical. Thankfully, there was an option to keep using the old UI. But I don’t think the newest models allow that.

I love my TiVo, but I expect it will be my last. I don’t want to use the new UI, and the cable company has ALWAYS been extremely hostile to TiVo equipment/owners. Having to use a “tuning adapter” is stupid and has caused issues over the years. And several years ago, cable-card users got banished into 720P only mode for ALL channels now. Now add Cox being just bought by Spectrum and I am guessing it will only be more hostile and expensive in the future.

And yes, I completely understand the utility and limitations of streaming services. I have a Roku Ultra. Streaming has its own problems and frustrations as well. It is not a better experience than using TiVo nor is it a drop-in replacement. Especially when it comes to finding and tracking things I want to see.

Re:Fine TiVo you have there. Shame something might

By markdavis • Score: 5, Informative Thread

>“Wasn’t this single feature half the reason you use TiVo in the first place?”

No. That was a feature added many years after the start of TiVo. It is not necessary, nor does it even work on half the recorded content. The skip feature is a single press to jump through the commercial section, you always have the option to just zoom through the commercials manually. I have not watched commercials for at least 35 years- first by recording painfully with VCR, then conveniently with several models of TiVo (my last/current being the Roamio).

>“The other half is just being able to record the show and watch it whenever you want.”

That is one of many features (of course it is the base function of any DVR). The killer feature of TiVo is its ability to learn what you like from your recording and ratings and then

1) Accurately track and record every episode of everything you want with zero intervention. It will shift the schedule or even channel if necessary, across year after year. And do it intelligently so you don’t end up with 10 of the same episode.

2) Predict other shows you might like and fill the rest of your storage with many hundreds of hours of things you might want to watch, so there is always something to watch and discover. Yet those recordings never rob space from anything you indicated are important.

And I have yet to see any cable company’s DVRs do those. Probably due to patents. Doesn’t matter anyway, time is ticking and the whole concept of cable TV is dissolving and I will be left with nothing but “streaming”, which is still currently inferior in several ways, and not likely to improve. (And streaming on a TiVo is a mess of slow and annoying. For streaming, I use a Roku Ultra).

Re: Fine TiVo you have there. Shame something mig

By ByTor-2112 • Score: 4 Thread

Incorrect. Anyone past my current decade is old. Anyone younger than my decade is just a kid.

Flock Offered Webinar Teaching Cops How to Surveil ‘No Kings’ Protesters

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Thursday 404 Media reported that Flock taught America’s cops "how they could surveil the No Kings protests" against President Trump (as well as “small parades”) in a webinar last year that described “using a mix of Flock’s technology and law enforcement’s own databases.”
In the webinar, Flock’s director of market management Caity Peak explains how real time crime centers — which are police surveillance centers that utilize Flock cameras and other surveillance cameras — can be used for emergency response, but can also be used to surveil “established events” like 4th of July fireworks displays, parades, bike races, Mardi Gras, and protests. The webinar shows just how routine the idea of always-on surveillance has become, and how casually it is used during extremely innocuous events. Peak explains that police can use FlockOS, a software platform that combines Flock’s automatic license plate readers (ALPR), drones, gunshot detectors, 911 data, and other surveillance cameras (including ones Flock does not own) into a “single pane of glass” or single piece of software to look at various types of surveillance in one place during both emergencies and relatively mundane events in a city or town.

“Imagine that you’re an incident commander, and you’re working this No Kings Protest,” Peak explains while a dashboard shows a series of surveillance tools overlaying the city of Denver. “If I’m somebody assigned a traffic post that’s working this No Kings Protest, I really don’t have time to go in […] and look at all these places [for different intelligence]. This is an example of viewing all of that in one place....” The dashboard Peak shows includes traffic information, a “response plan” for the protest, the floor plans of nearby buildings, as well as a series of video feeds of both outdoor-mounted cameras and cameras inside businesses and government buildings.

404 Media and the Electronic Frontier Foundation previously showed that police have specifically used Flock cameras to monitor the No Kings protests and other First Amendment-protected activity… This webinar shows this type of surveillance is not anomalous, and is specifically taught by Flock. The webinar also shows that Flock’s latest public stance — that its ALPR cameras are noninvasive technology, that they take only static images at a single place and time, and that they are primarily used to solve the worst crimes — is wildly misleading. Flock has time and time again pitched itself to police as a sort of operating system to solve crime and do real-time surveillance and predictive policing. ALPRs are just one part of this broader surveillance apparatus that Flock has created, markets to police, and teaches them how to use.

Re:Ooooh.

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Just more reasons to get rid of flock and create laws that prevent things like flock. Because Axon and others just replace flock.

We live in a strange time of double-speak and authoritarian rule. This does not change what a dragnet is and does or why dragnets are illegal.

It’s interesting the first comment is basically repeating the elite view “we already know everything about you, get over it”. Something that they definitely don’t apply to themselves. What is different is that in current US law, you can more or less outsource the actual dragnet to private industry and then treat the data you get back as unsourced tip offs that you don’t need to justify. There are some attempts to limit this, mostly after moments when politicians get tangled up in similar situations, but it really is a big change from historical rules.

Re:Ooooh.

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You seem to be really dumb. This is more evidence. That this specific evidence addresses a movement you apparently do not like does not make its general significance invalid. Either everybody has rights or freedom, or nobody has them. And that includes you, even if you lack the mental capacity to understand that.

Re:Why would they use a ‘Big Brother’ example?

By XXongo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Now, if you want the cameras turned off, the police beatings can resume.

I do not think that giving police seminars on how to use Flock cameras to do surveillance on protest marches and make tabulations of the license plates of all the people attending such marches, was intended as a tool to stop police beatings.

The Constitution can’t be Outsourced

By CustomBuild • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The First Amendment distinction here is important, but I don’t think it gets us all the way to “Flock is a private company, so this is none of the government’s business.” The First Amendment generally constrains the government, not private companies. A corporation can choose who it does business with, just as an individual can choose who they associate with or, importantly, who they don’t associate with. That’s the same basic freedom-of-association principle that often gets invoked when someone says that “cancel culture” is simply people exercising their right to stop associating with someone they dislike.

But that cuts both ways. Flock is entitled to build and sell surveillance technology, subject to the law. The government is also entitled to buy technology from private companies. The constitutional question is what the government does with it. The Supreme Court has made clear that a private company does not automatically become a state actor merely because it has a government contract or receives government money. Rendell-Baker v. Kohn is pretty explicit about that. But the Court has also made the opposite point: the government can’t simply contract away constitutional responsibilities and then claim the Constitution no longer applies. In West v. Atkins, and later in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, the Court recognized circumstances where a private party can become a state actor when it is performing a function the government itself is constitutionally obligated to perform.

So “the government is using a private company” isn’t automatically a constitutional loophole, but neither is it automatically a constitutional violation. The details matter: who is directing what, what authority is being exercised, what the government could legally do itself, and how closely the private company’s actions are tied to the government’s actions. That’s a much more useful question than simply asking whether Flock is a corporation.

What makes this particular story interesting is that Flock isn’t merely selling police a camera and saying “good luck.” The company is apparently teaching police how to combine ALPRs, drones, other cameras, 911 data, police databases and other information into one surveillance system, with a protest specifically used as the example. That’s a pretty different thing from selling a device that takes a picture of a license plate. Recent reporting has also found that Flock’s systems are evolving into much broader tools for searching vehicle movements and other data.

Well, good news: the police apparently don’t need to know who you are anymore. They just need to know where your car went. From there, the AI can apparently work backwards until it has a name, your associates, your history, and presumably a compelling reason why you are now “of interest.” All perfectly innocent, of course, because the computer did it.

This is also a wonderful example of how “we can’t identify individuals” ages. Yesterday’s limitation becomes today’s product feature, and yesterday’s privacy assurance becomes something that nobody remembers promising. Flock can now apparently search 6,000+ cameras, police databases and commercial identity records using broad behavioral queries, then let the system infer who you are from where your car happens to travel. That’s not really a license-plate reader anymore. It’s a behavioral dossier generator with a search box.

And I particularly enjoy the idea of 69 prewritten prompts. Nothing says “carefully limited law-enforcement tool” quite like shipping the surveillance system with a menu of questions an officer can ask about the population. The really important part is that you don’t necessarily need a plate number or a name to get started. Start with “which vehicles frequent this neighborhood?” and let the machine rummage around until it finds a story. Once the computer has invented the pattern, somebody can presumably invent the probable cause afterward.

I’m sure there are legitimate crimes this could help solve. The

Re:Ebb and Flow

By ClickOnThis • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

You kind of have to think of it as if you were going out to dinner with a large group of friends and you’re all trying to decide on a place. A few of your group just says that they’re “fine with whatever the rest of y’all pick.”

Choosing a government that can influence significantly the lives of everyone is somewhat more consequential than choosing where you want to have dinner. People should be more engaged, and not just let “the crowd” decide who governs.

Would you really blame them when you end up at some restaurant that kind of sucks, or blame the majority who actually chose to go to the lousy restaurant in the first place?

I would blame them both. One group couldn’t be assed to influence the result, and the other made a bad choice.

UN Votes To Encourage Map Projections More Accurately Reflecting the True Size of Continents

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
The United Nations has an announcement. “The UN General Assembly has voted overwhelmingly to encourage governments, schools and tech companies worldwide to stop using maps that make Africa look far smaller than it really is.”
By 164 votes to one, Member States on Friday endorsed a resolution promoting map projections that more accurately reflect the true size of continents — the culmination of an African-led campaign against the 16th-century Mercator projection, still the most widely used map in the world. The United States cast the sole vote against, dismissing the initiative as part of a “radical ideological project.” Six countries — Estonia, Georgia, Lithuania, Moldova, Serbia and Ukraine — abstained.

The resolution does not ban the Mercator projection or impose a replacement. Instead, it encourages governments, schools, international organizations and technology companies to use the Equal Earth projection and other so-called equal-area maps when relative size matters, and to teach the limitations of any flat map in representing a spherical planet.

Behind that seemingly technical debate lies a larger argument about history and power: whether a map designed for European sailors in the 16th century has, over generations, distorted not only geography but perceptions of a whole, vast and complex continent… [With Mercator maps] landmasses appear increasingly enlarged the farther they are from the Equator. Greenland, for instance, can look roughly comparable in size to Africa, even though Africa is about 14 times larger. Northern Europe and North America are similarly magnified, relative to equatorial regions. Despite its original navigational purpose, Mercator remains common in educational, media, digital and official materials. The resolution says those distortions have contributed to the “symbolic minimization” of Africa and perpetuated an unbalanced view of the world…

Equal-area maps do not make Africa larger; they remove the exaggeration Mercator gives landmasses closer to the poles.
The UN notes that hours before the vote, France’s foreign minister announced the country was planning to abandon Mercator for its maps of the world.

Re:I hate it here

By angel’o’sphere • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

There never was a point in “minimizing” Africa (or Russia or China for that matter).

It is a farking map projection.

Invent a better one, or place 0 longitude at Beijing or Tokyo and Africa looks smaller: on the same map projection.

No one ever had the intention to make Africa look small, that is a stupid bullshit idea.

Typical

By dskoll • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Almost everyone: “Let’s make things more accurately resemble reality…”

USA: No!!!!!! Reality is woke!!!!

It’s all about navigation, not politics

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Mercator projection is not some colonial conspiracy aimed at diminishing the importance of some continents but a conformal map preserving angles, which was a cartographic breakthrough immensely simplifying navigation by following rhumb lines (paths of constant compass bearing).

Re:It’s all about navigation, not politics

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Correct, but most maps are not used for such navigation. They are used to teach children about the world, and to show adults where things are relative to other things. The distortion of sizes defeats those purposes, so it makes sense to campaign for more accurate maps.

The size of Africa in particular is something that surveys have shown non-Africans to regularly underestimate. The effects of that are debatable, but it is claimed that the potential of the continent and the variety it sports are also underestimated as a result.

Geez, I was hoping for more from slashdot

By whitroth • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What an amazing number of utterly ignorant comments.

South Africa… so, tell me, slashdotters, what’s the most populous country in Africa?

And the idtiot talking about “gangs”, as though all of Africa, about the size of all of North America, was a small city with gangs.

And complaining about the UN having this even on their agenda is like complaining about trans-women on school sports teams, when there are more youth pastors in Texas alone that were convicted of child porn than there are trans-women athletes in school sports in the entire country, but that’s a major agenda of the GOP.