Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Russian Spy Satellites Have Intercepted EU Communications Satellites
  2. ‘Everyone is Stealing TV’
  3. As Software Stocks Slump, Investors Debate AI’s Existential Threat
  4. Anthropic Pledges To Keep Claude Ad-free, Calls AI Conversations a ‘Space To Think’
  5. Pinterest Sacks Workers For Creating Tool To Track Layoffs
  6. Why Google’s Android for PC Launch May Be Messy and Controversial
  7. Adobe Actually Won’t Discontinue Animate
  8. AMD Hints the Next-Gen Xbox Console Could Launch Next Year
  9. Say Hello To GoogleSQL
  10. OpenAI’s Lead Is Contracting as AI Competition Intensifies
  11. Walmart Joins $1 Trillion Club
  12. Google Home Finally Adds Support For Buttons
  13. Ultra-Processed Foods Should Be Treated More Like Cigarettes Than Food, Study Says
  14. NASA Delays Artemis II To March
  15. Google Plots Big Expansion in India as US Restricts Visas

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Russian Spy Satellites Have Intercepted EU Communications Satellites

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
European security officials believe two Russian space vehicles have intercepted the communications of at least a dozen key satellites over the continent. From a report:
Officials believe that the likely interceptions, which have not previously been reported, risk not only compromising sensitive information transmitted by the satellites but could also allow Moscow to manipulate their trajectories or even crash them.

Russian space vehicles have shadowed European satellites more intensively over the past three years, at a time of high tension between the Kremlin and the West following Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. For several years, military and civilian space authorities in the West have been tracking the activities of Luch-1 and Luch-2 — two Russian objects that have carried out repeated suspicious maneuvers in orbit.

Both vehicles have made risky close approaches to some of Europe’s most important geostationary satellites, which operate high above the Earth and service the continent, including the UK, as well as large parts of Africa and the Middle East. According to orbital data and ground-based telescopic observations, they have lingered nearby for weeks at a time, particularly over the past three years. Since its launch in 2023, Luch-2 has approached 17 European satellites.

‘Everyone is Stealing TV’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
A sprawling informal economy of rogue streaming devices has taken hold across the U.S., as consumers fed up with rising TV subscription costs turn to cheap Android-based boxes that promise free access to thousands of live channels, sports events, and on-demand movies for a one-time $200 to $400 purchase.

The two dominant players — SuperBox and vSeeBox — are manufactured by opaque Chinese companies and distributed through hundreds of American resellers at farmers markets, church festivals and Facebook groups, according to a report by The Verge. The hardware is generic and legal, but both devices guide users toward pirate streaming apps not available on any official app store.

vSeeBox directs users to a service called “Heat”; SuperBox points to “Blue TV.” One user estimated access to between 6,000 and 8,000 channels, including premium sports networks and hundreds of local affiliates. A 2025 Dish Network lawsuit against a SuperBox reseller alleged that some live channels on the device were being ripped directly from Dish’s Sling TV service — Sling’s logo was still visible on certain feeds. Dish has pursued resellers aggressively, winning $1.25 million in damages from a vSeeBox seller in 2024 over 500 devices and $405,000 from another over 162 devices. None of this has meaningfully slowed adoption. The market has roots in earlier Chinese-made devices like TVPad that targeted Asian expat communities and reportedly sold 3 million units before being litigated out of existence. SuperBox and vSeeBox simply broadened the audience to mainstream America.

Unbelievable!

By GoTeam • Score: 3 Thread
It’s shocking that someone would take something that they didn’t pay for. I’m going to write down the names of those devices and the services they funnel their clients to… I just want to make sure I don’t accidentally buy one of these devices…

The industrial revolution ran over our faces.

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Industry: “Watching content without paying is stealing. Bad consumes. Pay us.”

Industry: “Taking all your data without paying is our God Given Right. Fuck you. In fact, you should pay us while we take your data.”

Corporate culture isn’t just sick. It’s become zombified and is slowly eating the brains of the society that supports it.

Cable TV is dying

By twocows • Score: 3 Thread
Let me see, do I want to pay for a service that shows me stuff I don’t want to see filled with ads that I want to see even less, or do I want to not pay for a service that shows me what I want without ads? This isn’t that difficult of a choice. It’s no wonder cable TV is dying; the only price point anyone is willing to even consider it at is the one pirates offer.

I get cable TV bundled with my internet subscription (where I live there’s no other choice besides satellite) and even then the only time I ever use it is if I’m out and about and bored out of my mind, as my ISP kindly offers a web frontend that I can log into and watch it on. That’s an actual cool value add that I’ll give them… but even then it’s usually a better experience to just pop on my Jellyfin server and watch something I actually want to see without ads plastered over half the program.

‘Theft’ worked for AI.

By Fly Swatter • Score: 3 Thread
Prove me wrong.

Funny thing

By SouthSeb • Score: 3 Thread

We have this in South America for a looong time. I would estimate some 80% of households use these boxes.

It became so widespread that the major streaming platforms started to pressure the governments. Most of the devices were outlawed and recently there were huge cross-border crackdowns that took the pirat… ahem, alternative platforms down.

One very funny thing is that because it was a paid service, most people didn’t even realized it was illegal. When the boxes started to get bricked, consumer protection organizations got flooded with millions of complaints. There are reports of people that even reported it to the police.

As Software Stocks Slump, Investors Debate AI’s Existential Threat

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Investors were assessing on Wednesday whether a selloff in global software stocks this week had gone too far, as they weighed if businesses could survive an existential threat posed by AI. The answer: It’s unclear and will lead to volatility. From a report:
After a broad selloff on Tuesday that saw the S&P 500 software and services index fall nearly 4%, the sector slipped another 1% on Wednesday. While software stocks have been under pressure in recent months as AI has gone from being a tailwind for many of these companies to investors worrying about the disruption it will cause to some sectors, the latest selloff was triggered by a new legal tool from Anthropic’s Claude large language model (LLM).

The tool - a plug-in for Claude’s agent for tasks across legal, sales, marketing and data analysis - underscored the push by LLMs into the so-called “application layer,” where these firms are increasingly muscling into lucrative enterprise businesses for revenue they need to fund massive investments. If successful, investors worry, it could wreak havoc across a range of industries, from finance to law and coding.

What’s the problem

By bugs2squash • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think they are complaining that AI might be highly effective, but I think the risk is that AI proves to be broadly ineffective and it’s been a waste of so much resource.

If AI is effective and truly disruptive then it will take time, but humanity will adapt and we’ll be better off for it

If it proves to be as disruptive as blockchain then we wasted a lot of carbon

Re:It’s as useless as the average human

By dskoll • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The problem is, most people have learned to have a bit of healthy skepticism about what humans say and produce, whereas a lot more people accept anything an AI program says without any questioning.

Re:AI will strengthen FOSS and weaken SaaS.

By ebunga • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

On the one hand, most SaaS solutions are just webified implementations of crap that would be better suited to dBase III on DOS. On the flip side, AI as it’s being sold is SaaS in all its worst forms, except now its results aren’t repetable.

Investors are kinda crazy

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They are a bit like fortune tellers, trying to not only predict an increasingly unpredictable future, but trying to predict what other investors will do
It’s like a casino for the insane

Re:It’s as useless as the average human

By JaredOfEuropa • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
“So, it turns out that if you can make a program that’s only correct 90% of the time, you’ve already created a program that’s correct more often than the average employee, so it’s probably useful.”
It depends on what you’re doing with it. If you’re looking for facts and look around the internet yourself, you usually get a pretty good idea of how trustworthy the source is. But an AI makes truth and the worst nonsense look and sound equally authoritative, and that’s how most people take its answers.br But if you’re using it as a helpdesk, it’s probably fine. It’s a good application of AI, as it can do both 1st and 2nd line support, and if it is able to help people 90% of the time, that’s not too shabby.

Anthropic Pledges To Keep Claude Ad-free, Calls AI Conversations a ‘Space To Think’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic said today that its AI assistant Claude will not carry advertising of any kind — no sponsored links next to conversations, no advertiser influence on the model’s responses, and no unsolicited third-party product placements — calling Claude a “space to think” that should remain free of commercial interruption. The announcement comes days after Anthropic’s chief rival, OpenAI, announced plans to bring ads to some of its ChatGPT offerings.

Anthropic said its internal analysis of Claude conversations found that a significant share involve sensitive or deeply personal topics. An advertising-based model would also create incentives to optimize for engagement and time spent rather than usefulness, Anthropic said, noting that the most helpful AI interaction might be a short one that doesn’t prompt further conversation.

Anthropic generates revenue from enterprise contracts and paid subscriptions. The company said it is exploring agentic commerce — Claude handling a purchase or booking on a user’s behalf — but stressed that all such interactions should be user-initiated, not advertiser-driven. Anthropic has also brought AI tools to educators in over 60 countries and said it may consider lower-cost subscription tiers and regional pricing.

That’s awesome and I prefer Claude

By expresspotato • Score: 3, Funny Thread
I prefer the responses of Claude anyways. They’re more complete, insightful and helpful. It’s really helped me with dating and understanding who I am.

Re:That’s awesome and I prefer Claude

By Zocalo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Pardon the cynicism, but I remember Google claiming that they would “do no evil”, yet here we are. I’ll enjoy the ad-free Claude while it lasts, and hopefully that will be for a long time, but sooner or later I fully expect the desire for advertising dollars to trump any laudable claims they might be making today.

Good intent but..

By Defraggle • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Enshittification is inevitable.
Capitalism demands it.

Pinterest Sacks Workers For Creating Tool To Track Layoffs

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Pinterest has sacked two engineers for tracking which workers lost their jobs in a recent round of layoffs. BBC:
The company recently announced job cuts, with chief executive Bill Ready stating in an email he was “doubling down on an AI-forward approach,” according to an employee who posted some of the memo on LinkedIn.

Pinterest told investors the move would impact about 15% of the workforce, or roughly 700 roles, without saying which teams or workers were affected. But then “two engineers wrote custom scripts improperly accessing confidential company information to identify the locations and names of all dismissed employees and then shared it more broadly,” a company spokesperson told the BBC. “This was a clear violation of Pinterest policy and of their former colleagues’ privacy,” the spokesperson added.

The script written by the Pinterest engineers was aimed at internal tools used at the company for employees to communicate, according to a person familiar with the firings who asked not to be identified. The person said the script created an alert for which employee names within a tool like the team communication platform Slack were being removed or deactivated, giving some insight into who at the company was impacted by the layoffs.

Re:Misleading title

By sjames • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
They accessed Slack, as they were permitted to do. This is just cowardly management wanting to can people but not wanting to own up to it.

Re: Misleading title

By Luke has no name • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They were sacked for looking at slack statuses. Stop carrying corporate water.

Re:Have been sacked

By pete6677 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m just surprised Pinterest has so many employees remaining. What could they possibly be doing? Pinterest hasn’t meaningfully changed in like 15 years now. It was always kind of worthless to begin with.

Re: Misleading title

By Racemaniac • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s not the same information in terms of privacy.
layoffs.xls is a document that’s not shared.

But if the company uses a platform like slack where people can clearly see people disappearing, then they share that data and can’t possibly claim people aggregating the data they shared have done anything wrong…

Re:Remember you don’t need a union

By ClickOnThis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I remember a steel union demanding higher wages, the plant meeting their demand, and the union calling a strike anyway because there hadn’t been a strike in ages.

This is either BS, or you’re grossly misrepresenting what happened.

First, a union that neogiates with an employer that meets their demands and goes on strike anyway is bargaining in bad faith. If either side did such a thing, the other side can go to court to seek remedies.

Second, a union cannot go on strike on a whim. They have to be in a legal strike position (their contract has expired.) The same goes for an employer who locks out employees. And unlike an employer, a union has to have a strike mandate from its membership, i.e., a majority vote for job action.

And finally, no union calls a strike just because there hasn’t been one “in ages.” Going on strike is a serious thing, with consequences for both sides. No union takes such a decision lightly.

Why Google’s Android for PC Launch May Be Messy and Controversial

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Google’s much-anticipated plan to merge Android and ChromeOS into a single operating system called Aluminium is shaping up to be a drawn-out, complicated transition that could leave existing Chromebook users behind, according to previously unreported court documents in the Google search antitrust case.

The new OS won’t be compatible with all existing Chromebook hardware, and Google will be forced to maintain ChromeOS through at least 2033 to honor its 10-year support commitment to current users — meaning two parallel operating systems running for years.

The timeline itself is messier than Google has let on publicly, the filings suggest. Sameer Samat, Google’s head of Android, called the merger “something we’re super excited about for next year” last September, but court filings describe the “fastest path” to market as offering Aluminium to “commercial trusted testers” in late 2026 before a full release in 2028.

Enterprise and education customers — the segments where Chromebooks currently dominate — are slated for 2028 as well. Columbia computer science professor Jason Nieh, who interviewed Google engineers as a witness in the case, testified that Aluminium requires a heavier software stack and more powerful hardware to run.

Should We Care?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Will it be anything worthwhile? Or will it be another tiny niche Google walled garden, eclipsed by Windows, MacOS, Linux…

Messy and Controversial

By bugs2squash • Score: 5, Funny Thread
The controversy will arise from the spelling of Aluminum

Re:RISC Rules Everything Around Me

By AmiMoJo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

ChromeOS and Android are both based on Linux, so run on most stuff with a bit of effort. ChromeOS Flex is the version for general computers and is decently compatible.

This seems like a storm in a teacup. They are talking about 5-6 years of overlap, which isn’t untypical for this kind of big OS shift. 10 years of support isn’t massive either, it’s what Microsoft offers for Windows. Support only means fixing security issues and existing bugs.

Re:But why?

By DesScorp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Columbia computer science professor Jason Nieh, who interviewed Google engineers as a witness in the case, testified that Aluminium requires a heavier software stack and more powerful hardware to run.

This just doesn’t make sense. We’re supposed to believe that the software now running on phones requires more hardware than the software now running on laptops?

I’m convinced Google is run by idiots. Look at ChromeOS Flex. With just a few tweaks, with the allowance of just a few desktop apps, Google would have a wide-open opportunity to make a serious run at Microsoft’s home PC dominance because of the whole Windows 11 requirements issue. There are millions upon millions of perfectly good computers that are now going to landfills because of that, and they could all have Flex running on them if it wasn’t for Google’s short-sighted strategy. You can’t even watch a DVD on Flex after Google shitcanned VideoLan from their approved apps list. They insist you use only Google stuff via the cloud. Such a damn wasted opportunity since Flex is easy to install and use otherwise, and a fairly pleasant user experience.

Re:But why?

By sabbede • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I suspect that they are very smart, there are just too many of them. Get the smartest 100 people in the world, put them in a room, and wait to be amazed at how stupid the results are.

Adobe Actually Won’t Discontinue Animate

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Adobe is no longer planning to discontinue Adobe Animate on March 1st. From a report:
In an FAQ, the company now says that Animate will now be in maintenance mode and that it has “no plans toâdiscontinue or remove access” to the app.

Animate will still receive “ongoing security and bug fixes” and will still be available for “both new and existing users,” but it won’t get new features. Many creators expressed frustration after Adobe’s original discontinuation announcement from earlier this week, and the application is still used by creators like David Firth, the person behind the animated web series Salad Fingers. Now, Adobe says that “We are committed to ensuring Animate usersâalways have access to their content regardless of the state of development of the application.”

That’s not very different

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

Animate will still receive “ongoing security and bug fixes” and will still be available for “both new and existing users,” but it won’t get new features.

The only difference between that and what they said before is that they will still be selling it. They have already committed to maintaining it for three years, that’s “ongoing”. There is no promise to bring it to new Windows versions, so that’s not different either. If the only difference is that Adobe agreed to take more people’s money, it’s not a difference.

Re: That’s not very different

By sziring • Score: 5, Informative Thread

You’re not wrong but this is being driven by the community. Word it differently and take their money because that is what makes the consumer sleep at night.
It also doesn’t hurt that they stock tanked in the last couple days.

Shareholders must be happy

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
Nothing tells you a CEO is incompetent like a public U-turn.

AMD Hints the Next-Gen Xbox Console Could Launch Next Year

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Speaking during an earnings call on Tuesday, CEO Lisa Su stated that its development of Microsoft’s next-gen Xbox SoC is "progressing well to support a launch in 2027.”

While the comment doesn’t outright confirm the next Xbox will release next year, it indicates that the Microsoft could be ready to launch soon.

RAM Shortage

By Mr_Blank • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Will the RAM shortage impact the price?

There have already been reports that chip shortages will impact the availability of chips for home computers, phones, and automobiles. Maybe Microsoft put in a huge order for its requirements and is ahead of the curve.

Say Hello To GoogleSQL

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Google has quietly retired the ZetaSQL name and rebranded its open source SQL analysis and parsing project as GoogleSQL. This is not a technical change but a naming cleanup meant to align the open source code with the SQL dialect already used across Google products like BigQuery and Spanner. Internally, Google has long called the dialect GoogleSQL, even while the open source project lived under a different name.

By unifying everything under GoogleSQL, Google says it wants to reduce confusion and make it clearer that the same SQL foundation is shared across its cloud services and open source tooling. The code, features, and team remain unchanged. Only the name is different. GoogleSQL is now the single label Google wants developers to recognize and use going forward.

Another Google fad project

By greytree • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’ve converted all my SQL code to use ZetaSQL and then to use GoogleSQL and we’re getting ready to release to production and … …it’s gone.

You’ll regret falling for a Google fad project: https://killedbygoogle.com/

Soon in the news

By Bu11etmagnet • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Soon: Say Goodbye to GoogleSQL

Why not use ChatGPT?

By nospam007 • Score: 3 Thread

Just give normal language instructions and let ChatGPT create the needed SQL
Seems like it was made for that job.

But why?

By necro81 • Score: 3 Thread
There are lots of SQL already floating out there. Why did Google feel the need to add yet another to the mix? Does GoogleSQL genuinely offer benefits over others out there, or is it just not-invented-here syndrome?

Re: Sign of impending doom?

By TuballoyThunder • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Either that or it will harvest data to improve ad targeting.

OpenAI’s Lead Is Contracting as AI Competition Intensifies

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI’s rivals are cutting into ChatGPT’s lead. From a report:
The top chatbot’s market share fell from 69.1% to 45.3% between January 2025 and January 2026 among daily U.S. users of its mobile app. Gemini, in the same time period, rose from 14.7% to 25.1% and Grok rose from 1.6% to 15.2%.

The data, obtained by Big Technology from mobile insights firm Apptopia, indicates the chatbot race has tightened meaningfully over the past year with Google’s surge showing up in the numbers. Overall, the chatbot market increased 152% since last January, according to Apptopia, with ChatGPT exhibiting healthy download growth.

On desktop and mobile web, a similar pattern appears, according to analytics firm Similarweb. Visits to ChatGPT went from 3.8 billion to 5.7 billion between January 2025 and January 2026, a 50% increase, while visits to Gemini went from 267.7 million to 2 billion, a 647% increase. ChatGPT is still far and away the leader in visits, but it has company in the race now.

google has the google.com advantage

By Espectr0 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

especially if they are counting google searches as gemini searches

Re:google has the google.com advantage

By LostMyBeaver • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Give credit where it’s due.

I basically stopped using Google most of the time because I could use Copilot for most things. So, I suppose if I were to measure, I google about 70% less than i used to. I mean, most of my googling was figuring out how to do things and these days, I spend my of my time telling copilot to figure out how to do things instead.

That said, I tend to Google when ChatGPT is failing. And well, it fails a lot. It’s really just not a very good product.

So, then I use Gemini through Google and more often than not, it gets it right when OpenAI bombs it.

Gemini has become a better set of models than ChatGPT. I probably wouldn’t even use ChatGPT if Windows wasn’t so utterly intertwined with it.

That said, I pay $10 a month for AI. I have my own LLM server and it’s based on a $120 graphic card and it’s getting REALLY good now. I don’t think I’ll be using cloud llms much longer. Thinking models don’t need to be big. So, a 10-16GB GPU should be enough. 24 would be nicer for a longer context length though. It’s pretty funny that Qwen 2.5 7b actually outperforms the biggest and baddest models if you use it agenticly and tell it to just figure it out. It doesn’t need to know absolutely everything. it only needs to know how to research and take notes as it goes along.

A more telling stat

By gtall • Score: 3 Thread

A more telling statistic would be the amount of money the AI companies are getting from selling their tat to other companies. The retail consumers do not seem excited and I do not think the AI companies give a flying rat’s ass about retail consumers except as icing on the cake, if it is there. However CEOs seem to be having orgasms over it. Are they putting their money where their mouth has been? Does anyone have anywhere we can go to see these stats?

Is this why Nvidia bialed on their deal?

By high_rolla • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I wonder if this is why Nvidia has bailed (or looks to be bailling) on their pledge to invest $100 billion in OpenAI?
It probably wouldn’t be a good bet pouring all that money into a company whose market share is tending down that fast.

Google is forcing Gemini on Android

By Laxator2 • Score: 3 Thread

A few days ago I got a message from Google informing me that they are forcing Gemini on Android devices.
As expected, I was informed that Gemini will slurp up everything I do on the Android tablet to “better something, something”.
I don’t think I’m the only one who thinks that the value of the AI chatbots is in the information that people reveal about themselves.
When spying on websites, users can only click on what is presented to them. On the other hand, keeping users engaged in a “conversation” will make them reveal information that the designers of the website did not think of.
Google being in the personal data business have the greatest need to slurp up as many conversations with the chatbots as possible, so they will try to grab marketshare from OpenAI.

Walmart Joins $1 Trillion Club

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Walmart’s market cap surpassed $1 trillion on Tuesday, putting the largest U.S. retail chain in an exclusive club dominated by tech groups. Bloomberg adds:
The Bentonville, Arkansas-based chain — a longtime favorite of bargain-hunting consumers — has flexed its massive scale and supplier network to keep prices low and grab market share across the income spectrum. While Walmart has maintained its appeal to households looking for value, its online offerings are drawing new, wealthier shoppers seeking convenience.

Great for the workers

By FictionPimp • Score: 5, Funny Thread

That kind of growth must be great for the workers in terms of salary, benefits, and quality of life.

A trillion

By Retired Chemist • Score: 3, Funny Thread
I guess a trillion dollars is not what it used to be.

Do their employees still need food stamps to live?

By ArghBlarg • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Not much else needs to be said. A $1T company, yet a drain on the nation.

WM isn’t what it used to be…

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

IMHO, I’m curious who is shopping from there. I know that I rather go anywhere else than WM, because stuff like underwear, headlight bulbs, even batteries are locked up, and good luck getting a store person to even bother walking over to help with that. Even when they do, it means the end of your shopping visit, as you have to follow them to the register. Mail order? Amazon.

I can see them getting a captive audience if they are the only grocery store in a town, but in cities with an ALDI, HEB (a Texas chain that doesn’t suck), or other stores, people tend to go there.

I miss the days when they had some reason to stick around, be it a McDonald’s their own store, or even a Subway. Now, without the secondary stores, it just sucks, and even Targets have a Pizza Hut and a mini Starbucks that I can get a drink at.

Wish things would change so that we had real department stores again. IMO, WM shopping is pure drudgery now.

Re: With Donflation and

By Waffle Iron • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Inflation is a flat tax on people who hoard money under their mattresses and in their bank accounts.

And I’m totally sure you posting this same argument during the inflation in Biden’s term.

Google Home Finally Adds Support For Buttons

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Google Home users, your long nightmare is over. The platform has finally added support for buttons. The release notes for a February 2 update state that several new starter conditions for automations are now available, including “Switch or button pressed.”

Smart buttons are physical, programmable switches that you can press to trigger automations or control devices in your smart home, such as turning lights on or off, opening and closing shades, running a Good Night scene, or starting a robot vacuum. A great alternative to voice and app control when you want to control multiple devices, smart buttons are often wireless and generally have several ways to press them: single press, double press, and long press, meaning one button can do multiple things.

Imagine that

By battingly • Score: 3 Thread

A switch on the wall that you can use to turn lights on and off. We live in truly magical times.

Re:Imagine that

By dj.delorie • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

All jokes aside, this is more useful as “a button next to my bed that shuts off all the inside and outside lights, closes all the doors, activates the alarm, turns down the heat, makes sure the tv is off, and disables notifications until the morning.”

I’ve also seen one used as “a button to hit on your way to work to shut off all the things you forgot to shut off.”

A panic button next to your bed could be “turn on all the outside lights, save all the security camera footage somewhere extra, and tell me if any motion detectors outside this room go off any time in the next 10 minutes.”

I imagine someone will want one that makes their cell phone make a noise, so they can find it.

Or, it’s a simple way to add a second switch to a room (or hallway) with one inconveniently-placed switch.

For a young child who is afraid of the dark, a button to dim the lights to 20% after they’re in bed, and automatically turn them off an hour later.

A wireless doorbell.

Etc.

A old mystery explained

By Verteiron • Score: 3 Thread

> meaning one button can do multiple things.

At last, we know how the console buttons of Padme’s ship work.

Can’t wait to try out Home Assistant when I can…

By ArghBlarg • Score: 4, Informative Thread

.. Google Home has been nerfed in so many ways over the past few years, it’s almost useless now save for turning my lights on and off.

- They killed the Apps SDK, and all games and custom stuff
- They killed Google Music, and ‘play X from my Library”, only Youtube Premium Music now or ads in between every damn track
- They killed all podcast feeds other than Youtube Music (many podcasts aren’t on Youtube).
- They have borked most radio stations (used to be able to play almost any station via TuneIn)

The Enshittification has been wide, deep and purposeful. No way in hell will I *ever* pay for Youtube Premium.

Ultra-Processed Foods Should Be Treated More Like Cigarettes Than Food, Study Says

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have more in common with cigarettes than with fruit or vegetables, and require far tighter regulation, according to a new report. The Guardian:
UPFs and cigarettes are engineered to encourage addiction and consumption, researchers from three US universities said, pointing to the parallels in widespread health harms that link both.

UPFs, which are widely available worldwide, are food products that have been industrially manufactured, often using emulsifiers or artificial colouring and flavours. The category includes soft drinks and packaged snacks such as crisps and biscuits. There are similarities in the production processes of UPFs and cigarettes, and in manufacturers’ efforts to optimise the “doses” of products and how quickly they act on reward pathways in the body, according to the paper from researchers at Harvard, the University of Michigan and Duke University.

They draw on data from the fields of addiction science, nutrition and public health history to make their comparisons, published on 3 February in the healthcare journal the Milbank Quarterly. The authors suggest that marketing claims on the products, such as being “low fat” or “sugar free,” are “health washing” that can stall regulation, akin to the advertising of cigarette filters in the 1950s as protective innovations that “in practice offered little meaningful benefit.”

Re:No Jesus was NOT as socialist

By Morromist • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Jesus is pretty clear that the kingdom of heaven demands that you give your wealth away in order to enter it. Is Jesus not the king and ultimate goverment of the earth? Does he not tell you repeatedly to give up your possessions to the poor? If that isn’t like socialism it is even less like capitalism. Many times have I seen rich people read passages from the bible that directly say “Do not be rich”. The words seem to flow around them like a vapor.

The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet? 21Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me. But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions.
Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved? But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore? And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name’s sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.

But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first.

Re:This is how they kill the poor

By skam240 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You forgot the most important part, the extremely high taxes on cigarettes which would most definitely be effective in reducing consumption of ultra processed food.

Re:Once again we can’t get Americans

By Bert64 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s cheaper because the chicken nuggets are made from a less desirable waste product. The whole chicken contains the premium pieces (breasts, legs, wings) as well as a small amount of waste.
The chicken nuggets are made from the waste after the prime pieces have been cut off and sold for a higher price. When you buy a bag of chicken nuggets you’re not buying whole chicken, you’re buying the waste from several chickens where the premium pieces have already been sold.

Re:This is how they kill the poor

By chefren • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

But when a life-long smoker gets lung cancer or an obese person gets type 2 diabetes, it’s pretty clear what the cause is.

Re:This is how they kill the poor

By Rei • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The thing is that “ultra-processed food” is not a synonym for “junk food”. It’s a massive category that contains most things that people eat. Baby food is “ultraprocessed”. A granola bar containing only four raw grains / nuts and whey powder is “ultraprocessed”. Store wholegrain bread is “ultraprocessed”. Vitamins are “ultraprocessed”. But homemade cake isn’t ultraprocessed. Homemade doughnuts are not ultraprocessed. Cream and coconut oil and lard aren’t ultraprocessed. It’s a dumb category. Yes, the average of the “ultraprocessed” category is worse than the average of the non-ultraprocessed category, but that’s like saying that because the mean lifespan in Colorado is longer than the mean lifespan in New Mexico, then you should treat moving across the border like a death sentence and act like everyone in New Mexico will live shorter than everyone in Colorado - rather than looking at individual causitive factors.

It’s not “processing” that makes food bad - it’s individual things. Preserved meats are bad because of nitrates/nitrites (cooked in fat). Smoked meats are harmful because carcinogenic compounds produced by smoking. Product loaded with sugar or salt to preserve them or appeal more to consumers are harmful because of that sugar or salt. High carb foods are bad because they’re high carb. Etc. It’s individual causes that should be examined individually that determine whether a food is net harmful, not whether it’s “ultraprocessed”, and these causes remain harmful whether the food is “ultraprocessed” or not. Whey doesn’t go from healthy to harmful just because you powder it. Whole wheat bread doesn’t become less healthy than cake just because it’s designed to last longer on a store shelf. Etc. We need to be focusing on specific causes and specific healthy eating behaviors (for example: eating more vegetables, more fibre, etc).

What I hate most about the “ultraprocessed” category is that it’s a backdoor for woo to sneak into nutrition. By pretending that it’s “processing in general” that’s the problem, rather than specific causes, it inherently poses an alternative that anything “natural” is good (which it absolutely is not), and in turn pushes for things like organic food, fad diets, etc.

NASA Delays Artemis II To March

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
ClickOnThis writes:
NASA has delayed the Artemis II launch to March of this year, after a wet dress-rehearsal uncovered a hydrogen leak. From the NASA article:

During tanking, engineers spent several hours troubleshooting a liquid hydrogen leak in an interface used to route the cryogenic propellant into the rocket’s core stage, putting them behind in the countdown. Attempts to resolve the issue involved stopping the flow of liquid hydrogen into the core stage, allowing the interface to warm up for the seals to reseat, and adjusting the flow of the propellant.

Teams successfully filled all tanks in both the core stage and interim cryogenic propulsion stage before a team of five was sent to the launch pad to finish Orion closeout operations. Engineers conducted a first run at terminal countdown operations during the test, counting down to approximately 5 minutes left in the countdown, before the ground launch sequencer automatically stopped the countdown due to a spike in the liquid hydrogen leak rate.


Deja Vu?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Freezing temperatures in Florida. Leaking o-rings. Fuel leak.

Why do I have this sense of deja vu?

For the record, I fully expected the launch to be delayed. just Artemis things.

Re:Completely Predictable

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There’s always at least 1 hydrogen valve issue. Perhaps they should redesign their valves?

There’s always at least 1 hydrogen leak issue. Perhaps they should redesign their rocket.

Valves, connectors, o-rings shrinking from cold temperatures, loose pins blowing out at high speed causing tiny nicks in tubing that hydrogen leaks through very easily… these are just a few of the many ways hydrogen can go wrong.

Hydrogen is not the answer. Hydrogen is the question. “H*ll, no” is the answer. In any sane universe, it’s far better to have to lift 80% more fuel for your upper stages than to keep canceling or delaying launches for months at a time to avoid blowing up… and still blow up once (Challenger) and almost twice (Columbia in 1999).

IMO, it was a big mistake to go with hydrogen as the main engine fuel, and anyone who studied the history of the shuttle should have reached that conclusion long before Artemis was planned, or even Ares. But it was more important to keep jobs in the districts where the Space Shuttle main engines were manufactured than it was to build something reliable, so we got the best design that a committee of career politicians could produce.

Now we’re stuck with it, at least until SpaceX has a human-rated Starship launch vehicle. And at that point, I hope the remaining Artemis hardware will be quietly scrapped as the mistake that it was.

Re:Completely Predictable

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Challenger was a problem with a solid fuel booster. No hydrogen involved. Columbia was an issue with ice, which would be a problem for any cryogenic fuel… basically anything other than solid fuel.

Re:Completely Predictable

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Informative Thread

One could also argue that, in a sane universe, it’s far worse to have to lift 80% more fuel for your upper stages (and not to mention the required additional fuel on the lower stages to life the extra fuel for your upper stages) than to delay a launch. Hell, one could argue it’s fucking absurd, unless one also gets super excited about it taking a month of orbital refueling to get your rocket.... well, fucking anywhere.

A 1.8x increase in fuel consumption is not going to make it take a month unless it was already going to take 18 days with hydrogen. We’re not talking about orders of magnitude here. We’re talking about a relatively small difference in the amount of energy per unit of mass. And in exchange for that relatively small reduction in payload capacity, launches have to endure constant failures that more traditional launch systems don’t.

Even ignoring the risk of embrittlement causing an in-space disaster, I’m pretty sure nobody is seriously considering using hydrogen for orbital refueling because of the leaks alone. There’s no way to fix them in space, so you’d have to launch your fuel right before you need it. For that reason alone, I don’t think they’re even seriously considering it for refueling on Mars. Hydrogen is being used for getting humans into orbit and lifting payloads. The only refueling that I’m aware of is by Starship, whose in-orbit parts are methane-based.

Realistically, we need to get better at handling hydrogen.

Realistically, NASA and its contractors have been struggling to achieve that for more than fifty years and still haven’t pulled off. I mean sure, people who don’t try again after a failure never succeed, but if you keep trying over and over and still don’t succeed, at some point, it makes sense to acknowledge that you’re never going to be good enough and stop trying. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. And here we are 50 years later, and hydrogen leaks still are repeatedly unmanageable. They’re not even trying to stop leaks completely — just keep them below the threshold where the rocket would blow up. Yikes.

For orbital refueling to be possible with hydrogen, you’d need to stop leaks completely, and have the whole system remain leak-free after enduring the shock of getting launched into space. I would not want to place bets on that happening any time soon.

I’m aware of its problems, but I think much of the extant problems are because it’s too easy to just “work around them”, rather than really fix them.

To some degree, sure. On the flip side, other than the engines themselves, somebody designed this thing from scratch relatively recently. They could have designed it to be slightly bigger with methane for the top stage fuel, and you wouldn’t *need* to solve any of those problems, because they would be solved by virtue of the fuel not being such a pain in the a** to work with.

It’s one thing to solve problems that have to be solved. It’s another to spend huge amounts of money to solve problems primarily because politicians insisted on reusing leftover shuttle parts to keep jobs in their districts. If throwing a little bit more fuel at the problem solves a problem, I say throw more fuel at the problem.

at least until SpaceX has a human-rated Starship launch vehicle.

lol… A human-rated Starship… isn’t going *anywhere* fucking close to the moon, unless we’ve also got a magical fuel depot waiting in orbit for it, itself fueled by a dozen or so launches, waiting for it.

A human-rated Starship is exactly what they’re planning to land on the moon. And it uses methane. And yes, they’re planning to use multiple refueling launches to get it into the correct orbit.

Re:Completely Predictable

By DamnOregonian • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Agreed entirely, though I’d say Starship’s problem is/was dry mass being too high, and a near-comical misdeclaration of how much this space semi truck would weigh, and how much thrust its engines would produce.

Given all of that, do we think V3 is going to put 100t into orbit? Na, I don’t. Especially since V2 was supposed to.
I know they’ve got really good engineers over there doing their shit. But they’re also working under someone who is quite simply disconnected from reality, and has temper tantrums when the cognitive dissonance hits.

In a universe where they can put 200t into orbit, that thing becomes one bad motherfucker.
However, I suspect by that time it’ll be a third stage on something that looks like a Saturn V, just 6x taller. (Can we get a SuperDuperHeavy?)

But hey- my heart is with them, even if that space dumptruck does have some very strange fangirls.

Google Plots Big Expansion in India as US Restricts Visas

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot
Alphabet is plotting to dramatically expand its presence in India [non-paywalled source], with the possibility of taking millions of square feet in new office space in Bangalore, India’s tech hub. From a report:
Google’s parent company has leased one office tower and purchased options on two others in Alembic City, a development in the Whitefield tech corridor, totaling 2.4 million square feet, according to people familiar with the deal. The first tower is expected to open to employees in the coming months, while construction on the remaining two is set to conclude next year.

Options in the real estate industry give would-be tenants the exclusive right to rent, or in some cases buy, a property at a predetermined price within a specific time frame. It’s also possible Alphabet will not exercise the option to use the additional towers. If it does take all of the space, the complex could accommodate as many as 20,000 additional staff, which could more than double the company’s footprint in India, said the people, asking not to be identified because the plans aren’t public. Alphabet currently employs around 14,000 in the country, out of a global workforce of roughly 190,000.

[…] US President Donald Trump’s visa restrictions have made it harder to bring foreign talent to America, prompting some companies to recruit more staff overseas. India has become an increasingly important place for US companies to hire, particularly in the race to dominate artificial intelligence.

Old boss once told me..

By TigerPlish • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Old boss once told me, he’d set up a complete call center for a US client in India, for less than he paid any one of his engineers, maybe 10 years before he and I worked together.

Just move to India already, Google. It’s cheaper, and no burdensome regulations. You’ll be free to exploit your workers far more than you do here.

I mean, that’s Google’s purpose, right? Pay as least as possible for everything, including people and talent?

Re:Employment at will

By Targon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

That’s the effect of Republicans with an Industrial Revolution mindset that revolves around only catering to the wealthy.

Indian employees best deployed in India

By unixisc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Fully endorse this. If they want to hire Indians, for whatever reasons, just have offices in India! Instead of uprooting your employees from their homes in India, where they have families, relatives and others who can support them, just have your offices there. No need to struggle w/ visas, nor pay them US salaries (which they’d have to if they were to afford the living costs in the US). Pay them what is standard there, and set up the operations there accordingly

I have seen people, particularly the “free trade” crowd, argue that bringing them here brings jobs to Americans, since these new immigrants/guest workers have to buy products here locally. Doesn’t quite work, since those here temporarily would tend to convert dollars to rupees, determine that things are too expensive, and avoid shopping all that much. Also, if we want assimilation w/ US culture, it won’t happen as much, as for most of them, English is a second language. If people don’t like the “press ‘2’ for Espanol”, imagine when they have to press different numbers for Hindi, Gujarati, Telegu, et al. We’ll get one more country added to the culture wars, and local resentment against foreigners

Instead, build offices in different Indian cities for employees based in various places, so that they need not relocate. Even in the above story, Bangalore is already too congested, so Google would be better off building different campuses in other cities as well, such as Pune, Noida, Chennai, Kolkata and so on

They don’t care about Americans or Europeans

By xack • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Like I said in the article about the fibre internet shortage there are millions of Americans who learned to code and inhertited significant student debt in the process and have the skills that Google needs, yet they just want the cheap labour while rolling in YouTube Premium Subscription money. I’d even say that Google and the Tech industry is racist at this point just this time around it’s Indian Supremacy instead of White supremacy.

Re:Old boss once told me..

By unixisc • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

No burdensome regulations? Try opening a company there. Of course, for giants like Google, it won’t be remotely problematic, since both the Indian government and various state governments will fall over each other to land them in their states

But other than them, there is a whole host of legacy bureaucratic procedures that people have to go through before their companies can operate. There is a reason foreign companies typically prefer countries like Singapore or Vietnam to India