Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. New Lithium-Plasma Engine Passes Key Mars Propulsion Test
  2. Amazon Stuck With Months of Repairs After Drone Strikes On Data Centers
  3. Microsoft’s Xbox Mode Is Now Available For All Windows 11 PCs
  4. AI Agent Designed To Speed Up Company’s Coding Wipes Entire Database In 9 Seconds
  5. Pentagon Reaches Agreements With Top AI Companies, But Not Anthropic
  6. ICANN Opens Applications For New Generic Top-Level Domains
  7. The Case Against an Imminent Software Developer Apocalypse
  8. GPT-5.5 Matches Heavily Hyped Mythos Preview In New Cybersecurity Tests
  9. Spotify Adds ‘Verified’ Badges To Distinguish Human Artists From AI
  10. Hackers Are Actively Exploiting a Bug In cPanel, Used By Millions of Websites
  11. The California Government Is Coming For Your E-Bikes
  12. The Invisible Force Making Food Less Nutritious
  13. Belgium Plans To Nationalize Nuclear Power Plants
  14. Musk Concludes Testimony At OpenAI Trial
  15. US Senators Ban Themselves From Prediction Markets Trading

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

New Lithium-Plasma Engine Passes Key Mars Propulsion Test

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA engineers have tested a next-generation lithium-plasma electric propulsion system that reached 120 kilowatts, a new U.S. record and about 25 times the power of the electric thrusters on NASA’s Psyche spacecraft. “Designing and building these thrusters over the last couple of years has been a long lead-up to this first test,” said James Polk, who is a senior research scientist at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “It’s a huge moment for us because we not only showed the thruster works, but we also hit the power levels we were targeting. And we know we have a good testbed to begin addressing the challenges to scaling up.” Universe Today reports:
While 120 kilowatts is a new record, NASA estimates it a future human mission to Mars will require 2 to 4 megawatts of power consisting of several thrusters and requiring more than 23,000 hours (958 days/2.6 years) of operation. To accomplish this, the thrusters would have to withstand more than 2,800 degrees Celsius (5,000 degrees Fahrenheit), which the thrusters achieved during testing.

The reason for the extended operation is due to the estimated time of an entire human mission to Mars, which is estimated to be approximately 2.6 years. This is because the launch window to Mars only opens once every two years due to the orbital behaviors of both planets. While no mission has ever returned from the Red Planet, this same launch window works from Mars to Earth, too. When launched within this window, robotic spacecraft have traditionally taken approximately 6-7 months to reach Mars.

However, a human mission would require a much larger spacecraft to accommodate the astronauts, food, fuel, water, and other mission-essential items. For the approximate 2.6-year mission, this would entail approximately 6-9 months traveling to Mars, followed by approximately 18 months on the surface of Mars until the next launch window opens, then another approximate 6-9 months back to Earth. However, having much less fuel due to the electric propulsion system could potentially alter this timeframe.

Mars is waste of resources.

By Lavandera • Score: 3 Thread

We should build industry on the Moon first and do cheaper robotic exploration.

And save the Earth - the only livable planet we will have in the near future…

120 kW

By JimBowen • Score: 3 Thread

Is that 120kW of thrust, or are they reporting it in the same way we hear about datacentres - in terms of input power consumption rather than useful work?
Genuine question, because it doesn’t say in the linked article and I can’t be arsed to watch a damned youtube video

Not 2.6 years of operation

By SubmergedInTech • Score: 3 Thread

requiring more than 23,000 hours (958 days/2.6 years) of operation

For the approximate 2.6-year mission, this would entail approximately 6-9 months traveling to Mars, followed by approximately 18 months on the surface of Mars until the next launch window opens, then another approximate 6-9 months back to Earth.

Why are the thrusters running during the 18 months at Mars? Mars has a much thinner atmosphere, so at any reasonable altitude any spacecraft in orbit will encounter much less drag than on the ISS around Earth. The ISS does not run its thrusters continuously; it gets an occasional boost from a Soyuz. And there isn’t much space debris around Mars compared with LEO, so not much to dodge. If the entire spacecraft lands, it’s definitely not running its thrusters the entire time.

So that’s 12-18 months (1 - 1.5 years) of operation, only when it’s headed to Mars or back. Half the quoted amount.

Amazon Stuck With Months of Repairs After Drone Strikes On Data Centers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Amazon’s cloud customers will need to wait several more months before the US tech company can repair war-damaged data centers and restore normal operations in the Middle East. The announcement comes two months after Iranian drone strikes targeted three Amazon data centers in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain — meaning that full recovery from the cloud disruption could take nearly half a year in all. The Amazon Web Services (AWS) dashboard posted an April 30 update describing how its UAE and Bahrain cloud regions “suffered damage as a result of the conflict in the Middle East” and are unable to support customer applications. The update also said that “relevant billing operations are currently suspended while we restore normal operations” in a process that “is expected to take several months.”

That wording suggests Amazon will continue to avoid billing AWS customers in the affected regions — ME-CENTRAL-1 and ME-SOUTH-1 — after it initially waived all usage-related charges for March 2026 at an estimated cost of $150 million. AWS also “strongly” recommended that customers migrate resources to other cloud regions and rely on remote backups to restore any “inaccessible resources.” Some customers, such as the Dubai-based super app Careem—which offers ride-hailing, household services, and food and grocery delivery — were able to get back online quickly after doing an overnight migration to other data center servers.

Re:Strange story.

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Look in the mirror while wearing your Trump hat, Trump sneakers, holding your Trump bible, and waving your don’t tread on me flag and say that again.

Re: They are referring to the Persian Gulf

By reanjr • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They shut off the strait in response to a war of aggression by the U.S. and Israel.

The only terrorism in this war are acts committed by the United States and Israel.

Re: They are referring to the Persian Gulf

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Which law is Iran breaking to make this closure “illegal”? I know a guy with 34 felony counts plus some sex crimes walking free. He isn’t an immigrant either.

With the amount of deregulation they got

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Not to mention the tax cuts Trump is still a damn good deal for them. Fun fact next year a shitload of rural and suburban hospitals are going to be shutting down.

That’s because the Republicans didn’t really have the votes to have ram those tax cuts through so they used a process called budget reconciliation that allows them to bypass Senate rules and pass legislation with a simple majority.

But that process requires everything be budget neutral on paper and no matter how crazy they did the math they couldn’t make that work without cutting Medicare and Medicaid.

Now from Medicare they mostly are using dirty little tricks to cut around the periphery but from Medicaid they’ve instituted work requirements that are basically impossible for the kind of person who is living on Medicaid to meet so that they just get kicked off. There’s also a shitload of other dirty little cuts to the program.

And for everyone thinking so what I’m not a dirty filthy, socialist on government healthcare why would I care? Your hospital relies on the money from Medicare and Medicaid to stay open and keep the private equity vultures fed.

Now if you win one of those major cities, the kind that Fox News will tell you is currently on fire because of antifa stormtroopers, then your hospital has enough other business to stay open.

But if you’re in the burbs or the sticks you’re in trouble. Now the rural folks don’t have a lot of options here. Rural people are either too stupid to understand they’re being screwed or they know they’re being screwed but they can’t do anything about it because there’s a guy who basically owns all the property in their county and if they want a job or a place to live they go through him. Turns out rural people aren’t actually very self-sufficient, decades and decades of poverty will do that to a man..

But still they’re expecting it. It’s the people in the suburbs that are going to be shocked when their hospitals start closing. It turns out that having a huge amount of sparsely populated land is nice as far as property values and comfort but not so good for your tax base. So there isn’t actually enough of a base in most suburbs to sustain their services and they actually rely heavily on subsidies from the inner cities and the federal government.

Well we just took down that chesterton’s fence and y’all going to find out what it’s like for your hospital is to start cutting services and closing. There is a fund to try and counteract some of it but it’s a tiny fraction of what’s needed and is mostly going to get sucked up by corrupt political insiders in the Republican party.

Anyway if you’re in a suburb or the sticks I highly recommend you don’t get sick for at least next 10 years. It’ll take that long for the Democrats to have a prayer in hell and doing some of this damage.

Re: They are referring to the Persian Gulf

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Iran has not ratified UNCLOS and it doesn’t apply in its territorial waters such as the Iranian part of the strait.

Kinda like the trumpistan doesn’t accept the jurisdiction of the ICJ over war crimes committed by trumpistani troops.

Microsoft’s Xbox Mode Is Now Available For All Windows 11 PCs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is rolling out Xbox mode to all Windows 11 PCs, bringing a full-screen Xbox PC app interface similar to Steam’s Big Picture Mode. “Some players in select markets will be able to download the Xbox mode experience today, with availability expanding to more players in those markets over the next several weeks,” says the Xbox team. The Verge reports:
Xbox mode aims to try and bridge the gap between Xbox consoles and Windows, but its original debut felt like a beta on the Xbox Ally devices. “Since first introducing Xbox mode, formerly known as ‘full screen experience,’ on Windows handhelds, we’ve been listening closely to player feedback and continuing to evolve the experience across devices,” says the Xbox team. “Those learnings directly shaped Xbox mode on Windows 11 PCs.”

Microsoft is also rolling out improvements to the Xbox Ally X handheld today, including a preview of its Auto SR upscaling technology. Xbox console owners are also getting a new dashboard update today, with the ability to disable Quick Resume on individual games and a feature to add custom colors to the dashboard.

Make it make sense

By Gavino • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I thought the idea of the Xbox was that game devs knew exactly what platform and hardware specs they were coding for. If any Win11 PC can run xbox games now, then this is 100% broken. This seems like a way for Microsoft to kill off Xbox, without saying they killed Xbox. If I was a game dev, I’d be avoiding anything “Xbox” like the plague.

another attempt

By Archfeld • Score: 3 Thread

This is just another sad attempt at a walled garden. I play games…lots of games in a wide variety of genres. I love GOG and ITCH. I am on steam and another half dozen platforms but I rarely buy anyhting I cant download for offline cosumption. In a setup like this, you own nothing, and even mod’ing is totaly controlled by an entity well known for SUCKING.

the *ZDoom engines and modding community have given me far more game hours than ANY published game. 40oz. and the DBP folks deserve credit.

XBox on PC is a great idea if done at OS level

By Somervillain • Score: 3 Thread
I bought an Ally and was fortunately able to return it because it couldn’t play basic games. However, I don’t really enjoy using Windows. I’d rather use Linux or mac....but I like games....how about an OS that skips all the Windows bullshit and just focuses on launching games? I am sure there are many improvements and optimizations that could be made to Windows if the developers knew you were only going to play video games on it and not try to run CAD, office, art, server, or productivity software on it.

My XBox is an amazing machine…perfectly reliable, fast, pleasant to use…on some surprisingly cheap hardware. If I had 3x the power with faster CPU and GPU, I would imagine it wouldn’t be THAT hard to deliver the same experience, just faster. I don’t think it’s restricting the hardware that makes it so great.

So yeah, if I were supreme dictator at Microsoft, I’d create a whole new XBox PC program…certification for hardware and opening up the XBox OS so that it could be run on certified PC hardware to allow hobbyists to spend their paychecks getting a mega-powered XBox....also open it to the Steam store....make a gamer’s dream and keep people from leaving you for Mac/PlayStation.

Re:Make it make sense

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The Xbox is already dead. This is Microsoft wanting to keep that subscriber revenue stream going.

AI Agent Designed To Speed Up Company’s Coding Wipes Entire Database In 9 Seconds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
joshuark shares a report from Live Science:
An AI coding agent designed to help a small software company streamline its tasks instead blew a hole through its business in just nine seconds. PocketOS founder Jer Crane, said that the AI coding agent Cursor —powered by Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 model — deleted the company’s entire production database and backups with a single call to its cloud provider, Railway, on April 24. […] “This isn’t a story about one bad agent or one bad API [Application Programming Interfaces],” Crane wrote in an X post. “It’s about an entire industry building AI-agent integrations into production infrastructure faster than it’s building the safety architecture to make those integrations safe.”

Crane’s company, PocketOS makes software for car rental companies, handling tasks such as reservations, payments, customer records and vehicle tracking. After the deletion, Crane said customers lost reservations and new signups, and some could not find records for people arriving to pick up their rental cars. “We’ve contacted legal counsel,” Crane wrote. “We are documenting everything.” Crane explained that Cursor found an API token — a “digital key” made of a short sequence of code that lets software talk to other services and prove it has permission to act — in an unrelated file which it then used to run the destructive command. According to Crane, Railway’s setup allowed the deletion without confirmation, and because the backups were stored close enough to the main database, they were also erased.

"[Railway] resolved the issue and restored the data,” Railway confirmed via email to Live Science. “We maintain both user backups as well as disaster backups. We take data very, VERY seriously.” In his post, he pointed to earlier reports of Cursor ignoring user rules, changing files it was not supposed to touch and taking actions beyond the task it had been given. To him, the database wipe was not a freak accident but the next step in a larger, more concerning, pattern. After the database vanished, Crane asked Cursor to explain what happened. The AI agent reportedly admitted that it had guessed, acted without permission and failed to understand the command before running it. “I violated every principle I was given,” the AI agent wrote. “I guessed instead of verifying. I ran a destructive action without being asked. I didn’t understand what I was doing before doing it.” The statement reads like a confession […]. “We are not the first,” Crane wrote. “We will not be the last unless this gets airtime.”

Founder Guilty Of Negligence

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Seems to me that PocketOS founder Jer Crane, is guilty of negligence.

It’s bad enough he’s vibe coding this shit. But, he didn’t even have backups.

Re:To err is human…

By Samantha Wright • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Say it with me, now. As we all know, the infamous saying goes:

A COMPUTER
CAN NEVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

THEREFORE A COMPUTER MUST NEVER
MAKE A MANAGEMENT DECISION

It’s really incredible how marketing departments can radiate amnesia like this with such proficiency.

Yep

By abulafia • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Dude made several WTF-worthy decisions, any of which would have disqualified him from working anywhere near production where I work.

Let us count the ways:

- Did not take the time understand his own infrastructure (the backup issue)
- Did not take the time to understand permission scoping
- Clearly has never heard the term “disaster recovery”
- Let a robot play in production
- with way too many toys laying around
- and no apparent thought to risk/reward tradeoffs beyond “everybody (I know) does it this way”
- when the bullet encountered his foot, his first impulse was to blame everyone else, rather than own his shit. Unless his next Xitter post describes how he hired someone competent to re-architect and manage his technical infra, if I were a customer, I would be looking for a competent alternative.

That’s not protection

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… backups were stored close …

If they are on the same platter, or in the same bucket as the working copy, they are not protected from damage, meaning, they are not backups: This is normalizing language (for doing nothing) in the article and lazy behaviour by the business. The real-world equivalent would be keeping the condoms with kitchen knives.

This is a story about incompetent AI taking charge of an incompetent software development team. Certainly, there’s lessons in there but ‘dangerous AI’ is not the first lesson.

Re: Founder Guilty Of Negligence

By iabervon • Score: 4, Informative Thread

According to the article, they (by way of their cloud provider) had DR backups, which they were able to get restored. But getting offline backups restored takes longer than the SLAs they give their customers and loses some data that hasn’t been copied offline yet, which is why they also have backups that are complete and immediately available, using the API key that the attacker — sorry, AI — found in a file it wasn’t supposed to have access to.

Pentagon Reaches Agreements With Top AI Companies, But Not Anthropic

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Pentagon says it has reached deals with seven AI companies — SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, Nvidia, Reflection AI, Microsoft, and AWS — to deploy their tools on classified Defense Department networks. The odd one out is Anthropic, which remains excluded after being labeled a supply-chain risk amid a dispute over military-use guardrails. Reuters reports:
SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, Nvidia, Reflection, Microsoft, and Amazon Web Services (AWS), several of which already work with the Pentagon, will be integrated into its secret and top-secret network environments, providing more military access to their products for use on sensitive topics, the Pentagon said in a statement. The lesser-known Reflection AI, which raised $2 billion in October, is backed by 1789 Capital, a venture capital firm in which Donald Trump Jr. is a partner and investor.

Since the Pentagon deemed Anthropic’s products a “supply-chain risk” in March and the two sides became embroiled in a lawsuit, the military has expressed increasing interest in AI startups. Since the blow-up, newer AI entrants have said the military has sped up the process of incorporating them onto secret and top-secret data levels to less than three months. The process previously took 18 months or longer.

By expanding AI services offered to troops, who use it for planning, logistics, targeting and in other ways to streamline huge operations and perform more quickly, the Pentagon said in its statement it will avoid “vendor lock,” a likely nod to its overdependence on Anthropic or other dominant service providers. […] AI has become increasingly important for the U.S. military. The Pentagon’s main AI platform, GenAI.mil, has been used by over 1.3 million Defense Department personnel, the agency noted in its release, after five months of operation.
Further reading: Google and Pentagon Reportedly Agree On Deal For ‘Any Lawful’ Use of AI

Ethics in Supply Chain

By Ksevio • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s quite telling that a company having ethics designates them a supply chain risk.

Especially after it was reported that the US bombing of a school was one selected by an AI tool and the government theoretically had policies already that aligned with their ethics

Re:Anthropic _is_ the odd one out.

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Anthropic IS the odd one out… in that they baked the guardrails into their model vs just in the license agreement.

Funny how that makes them a threat. Kind of like if you sold guns, but the guns magically would not fire at cops, and one particular group of “respectable businessmen” would not buy them because of that. Yeah… what would that imply about those particular customers intentions?

Re:Ethics in Supply Chain

By Tablizer • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Dictator-wannabe’s simply hate checks & balances.

Re:SpaceX, not xAI

By outsider007 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

xAI merged with SpaceX, you must’ve blinked and missed it.

Re: Ethics in Supply Chain

By ToasterMonkey • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It fits a pattern. Firing and harassing military lawyers because they want to replace them with yes-men. It doesn’t get any more plain than this. When your boss fires the company lawyer, not for past performance, but ahead of time because he might not like what’s coming, what the fuck is happening.

https://apnews.com/article/pen…

https://www.govexec.com/defens…

ICANN Opens Applications For New Generic Top-Level Domains

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
ICANN has opened applications for new generic top-level domains for the first time since 2012. The Register reports:
ICANN hasn’t offered new gTLDs since 2012, but on Thursday opened applications for new domains in 27 scripts. A 439-page Applicant Guidebook explains the process. The Register suggests paying attention to the string evaluation FAQ, which explains which gTLDs are valid, and those ICANN will likely frown upon. An FAQ describes this round of applications as giving “businesses, communities, and others the opportunity to apply for new top-level domains tailored to their community, culture, language, business, and customers.”

“A TLD can be a branding opportunity for a business, but the commercial opportunities are endless, allowing businesses in countries, entire sectors, or niche markets to develop a unique label on the Internet.” ICANN also sees this round as a chance to “create a more multilingual Internet for the billions of people who speak and write in different languages and scripts and are yet to come online.” If you fancy a gTLD, you’ll need to pay a $227,000 application fee by August 12th … and then wait, possibly until 2030 when this process ends.

Another ICANN money grab…

By ChrisKnight • Score: 5, Informative Thread

ICANN treating TLDs like a way to print money is why we started OpenNIC back in 2000.

https://opennic.org/

More opportunities for hackers

By whoever57 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This will provide hackers more opportunities to create misleading domain names that look like famous brands.

The Case Against an Imminent Software Developer Apocalypse

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
ZipNada shares a report from ZDNet:
Given the dour headlines as of late concerning the diminishing amounts of entry-level software development jobs, coupled with predictions of applications entirely AI-generated, one could be forgiven for assuming that software developers may soon be an endangered species. However, the data tells a different story. James Bessen, professor at Boston University, has been pushing back for some time against the talk of AI and automation displacing jobs on a mass scale, and lately has been arguing that the roles of software developers are nowhere near extinction.

AI is certainly not killing the software developer, Bessen said in a recent analysis (PDF). AI is taking over software development tasks and boosting productivity and output, but that is not translating into lost jobs, he argued. Instead, the types of software skills sought by companies are changing. “Surprisingly, however, after three years of AI use, software developer jobs have continued to grow robustly, reaching record levels of employment — 2.5 million in February,” Bessen said in the report, citing data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of software developers in the US has grown by over 400,000, or 19%, since ChatGPT was introduced in 2022. At that time, the employed software developer population was just under 2.1 million. […]

The productivity uptick developers are seeing may ultimately be a boost to their professional opportunities, however. “An important and possibly disruptive change is happening, but the common view misunderstands what is going on,” Bessen pointed out in his report. “Careful case studies find that AI improves the productivity of software developers — that is, the software produced per developer — by 30%, 50%, or more. And the rate of productivity improvement in software development is improving.” Tellingly, since 2022, when ChatGPT was introduced, developer productivity has increased noticeably, Bessen continued. “From 2003 to 2022, developer productivity grew at 3.9% per year; but from 2022 through 2025, it grew at 6% per year.” […] A coming flood of new software products, now more likely to be enhanced by AI, will continue to create jobs for developers, Bessen predicted. “Thus, mass unemployment of software developers seems unlikely to happen soon.” This doesn’t mean the job descriptions of developers or other computer occupations will remain static. AI is shifting and re-inventing these roles, Bessen added.

Efficiency Boost

By dontbemad • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
My own experience with leveraging LLMs has been one of an efficiency boost. As I have around 15 years of software architecture and development experience, I have yet to come across an instance where an AI is used to do something I can’t do, and instead is used to do something that I could have otherwise done myself, albeit much more slowly.

This has had a great effect on my workflow. I am still able to do high-level architectural planning, determine use-cases and usability parameters, etc. When I have those pieces figured out, I can use an LLM (in this instance Claude Sonnet or Opus 4.6) to do the actual generation of code, which I can then review and correct as I see fit. I have not (and will never) used an LLM as a replacement for my “higher brain functioning”, but when it comes to the “code-monkey” aspects of my work, it does them far faster than I can (and typically with a healthy respect for naming conventions, code patterns, etc.). I still get to enjoy the fun critical-thinking-laden aspects of my job, but the simple “regurgitation of learned code words” is offloaded to an all-too-willing counterpart.

Re:Efficiency Boost

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Same.

When AI was still young, I tried it and found the code quality to be unacceptable. I was at that time in the “it’s a bubble that will pop” crowd.

It’s better now. I use it more now. And it saves me time and makes me more productive.

It can’t do my job without me. And other people on the team still come to me for help. My skills as a designer and knowledge of our legacy system still make me valuable. I can just do more in less time now.

The other consequences of AI (impact on electricity cost, pollution, etc.) are problematic. So are the legal issues with mass copyright infringement in the training data. That all needs to be properly hashed out. Probably the end will be the same: the super rich get richer and everyone else gets table scraps. That’s just humans at work. But, apart from all that, AI is good.

I am officially in the pro-AI camp now.

Re:Efficiency Boost

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The amount of technical work a business needs to accomplish over time is not fixed. For a healthy business, there are always lots of things they would like to develop but can’t due to limits in capacity. So, with this productivity boost, they can get even more features out the door and (hopefully) make even more money.

Why would they cut staff and keep a tiny throughput with a smaller profit margin? Their competitors, who capitalize on AI-assisted efficiency boosts, will eat them for lunch. And then hire the staff they laid off.

It lets me be a dogshit jack of all trades....

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
AI use is mandated by my employer. Claude is nearly useless at everything I know how to do, but it does allow me to be productive outside my skill set. However, I am still unsure if it’s a net positive. I just flagged 2 PRs this week with a lot of AI-slop errors. One asshole let Claude write his PR and so the AI introduced an error and updated all the unit tests to ensure the build passed. Another had Claude update some code and it introduced a ton of garbage....1000 line class with 200 lines of pointless, worthless comments....and took what should have been 50 lines and copy/pasted it to be 800 instead of parameterizing the values.

However, in contrast, there are many UI-related skills I don’t have and AI makes it a lot faster for me to get ramped up. So it will help me write mediocre code I am clueless about, but for the stuff that I know really well (routine server-side business code), it produces dogshit mostly.

So put cynically, Claude 4.7 allows me to be a dogshit developer of all trades. Before, I’d just tell you “I don’t know Angular well enough to do that…you should send that ticket to my teammate who is an expert on that.” Now I can write dogshit code that might even work…in any language or technology of my choosing!!!!!

AND as a bonus, our total lines of code is astronomically expanding and quality rapidly going down because I have a few teammates who are much sloppier than I am about checking the output…and a few have stopped putting me on pull requests because I find many mistakes and tell them to correct them. :)…so maybe my day is getting more productive?…since my shittiest coworkers now exclude me from PRs. :)

Re:Some Truth - Anecdotal evidence

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You have a “novel cybersecurity architecture”, but at the same time “lack the coding background”? How does that work? Oh, wait, it does not.

GPT-5.5 Matches Heavily Hyped Mythos Preview In New Cybersecurity Tests

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Last month, Anthropic made a big deal about the supposedly outsize cybersecurity threat represented by its Mythos Preview model, leading the company to restrict the initial release to “critical industry partners.” But new research from the UK’s AI Security Institute (AISI) suggests that OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, which launched publicly last week, reached “a similar level of performance on our cyber evaluations” as Mythos Preview, which the group evaluated last month.

Since 2023, the AISI has run a variety of frontier AI models through 95 different Capture the Flag challenges designed to test capabilities on cybersecurity tasks, such as reverse engineering, web exploitation, and cryptography. On the highest-level “Expert” tasks, GPT-5.5 passed an average of 71.4 percent, slightly higher than the 68.6 percent achieved by Mythos Preview (though within the margin of error). In one particularly difficult task that involved building a disassembler to decode a Rust binary, AISI notes that “GPT-5.5 solved the challenge in 10 minutes and 22 seconds with no human assistance at a cost of $1.73” in API calls.

GPT-5.5 also matched Mythos Preview in its progress on "The Last Ones" (TLO), an AISI test range set up to simulate a 32-step data extraction attack on a corporate network. GPT-5.5 succeeded in 3 of 10 attempts on TLO, compared to 2 of 10 for Mythos Preview — no previous model had ever succeeded at the test even once. But GPT-5.5 still fails at AISI’s more difficult “Cooling Tower” simulation of an attempted disruption of the control software for a power plant, as every previously tested AI model also has. The new results for GPT-5.5 suggest that, when it comes to cybersecurity risk, Mythos Preview was likely not “a breakthrough specific to one model” but rather “a byproduct of more general improvements in long-horizon autonomy, reasoning, and coding,” AISI writes.

$1.73 - is that the price or the actual cost?

By memory_register • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The summary states that “AISI notes that “GPT-5.5 solved the challenge in 10 minutes and 22 seconds with no human assistance at a cost of $1.73” in API calls.” However, there is really good evidence that users only pay 5-10% of the actual cost; the rest is subsidized by VC dollars. What happens when those subsidies go away? https://www.wheresyoured.at/th…

Giving a hand grenade to a toddler

By CEC-P • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
OH GOOD, that’s what we needed Sam Altman’s crazy ass to have access to. Not solely because he’s a sociopath and I don’t trust him, but also because they can actually monetize this thing by selling security analysis to giant software vendors. At least he’d resist giving it to the US government, in theory.

Spotify Adds ‘Verified’ Badges To Distinguish Human Artists From AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Spotify is adding “Verified by Spotify” badges to distinguish human artists from AI-generated personas, using signals like linked social accounts, consistent listener activity, merchandise, and concert dates. The BBC reports:
The world’s most-used music streaming service said the ‘Verified by Spotify’ text and green checkmark icon would appear next to artist names when they meet “defined standards demonstrating authenticity.” This could include having linked social accounts on their artist profile, consistent listener activity or other “signals of a real artist behind the profile,” the company said, such as merchandise or concert dates.

In its blog post, Spotify said “more than 99%" of the artists listeners actively search for will be verified, representing “hundreds of thousands of artists.” It said the process would prioritize acts with “important contributions to music culture and history”, rather than “content farms,” with the platform rolling out verification and badges over the coming weeks.

priority for established stars

By bugs2squash • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
sounds like new bands will struggle with this

Too little.

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Nothing stops verified human artists from using AI to create their art, and then pass it off as their own.

Well, morality might stop some of them from doing this. But the need for money will override this in many cases.

Re: Too little.

By fluffernutter • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The people who care probably won’t be fooled by AI, and the people who are fooled won’t care.

That doesn’t mean what you think it does.

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… using signals like linked social accounts, consistent listener activity, merchandise, and concert dates.

So… not actually “verified”, more like presumed or best guess.

Will there be …

By PPH • Score: 3 Thread

… an asterisk for using AutoTune?

Hackers Are Actively Exploiting a Bug In cPanel, Used By Millions of Websites

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Hackers are actively exploiting a critical cPanel and WHM vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-41940, that allows remote attackers to bypass the login screen and gain full administrative access to affected web servers. Major hosts including Namecheap, HostGator, and KnownHost have taken mitigation steps or patched systems, but cPanel is urging all customers and web hosts to update immediately because the software is widely used across millions of websites. TechCrunch reports:
cPanel and WHM are two software suites used for managing web servers that host websites, manage emails, and handle important configurations and databases needed to maintain an internet domain. The two suites have deep-access to the servers that they manage, allowing a malicious hacker potentially unrestricted access to data managed by the affected software.

Given the ubiquity of the cPanel and WHM software across the web hosting industry, hackers could compromise potentially large numbers of websites that haven’t patched the bug. Canada’s national cybersecurity agency said in an advisory that the bug could be exploited to compromise websites on shared hosting servers, such as large web hosting companies.

The agency said that “exploitation is highly probable” and that immediate action from cPanel customers, or their web hosts, is necessary to prevent malicious access. […] One web hosting company says it found evidence that hackers have been abusing the vulnerability for months before the attempts were discovered.

Customers Update

By nuckfuts • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

cPanel is urging all customers and web hosts to update immediately.

For hosted websites, is this not something the web host should be doing for their customers?

Chained to Copyfail

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

They get auth through CPanel then get root through Copyfail.

Brace for impact.

Re:Chained to Copyfail

By DarkOx • Score: 4, Funny Thread

CopyFail only affects kernels from 2017 on, nothing that new is running CPanel

Re:Customers Update

By CEC-P • Score: 4 Thread
In my experience, it’s something ONLY the host can do for the customers. We can’t usually patch our own cpanel version on shared servers. You sometimes can’t on rented servers unless you did the install yourself.

The California Government Is Coming For Your E-Bikes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the San Francisco Standard:
If state lawmakers have their way, you’ll have to get a license plate for your e-bike, and if you’re planning to buy one next year, it’ll be slower. Amid growing concerns about e-bike safety, particularly among children in Bay Area suburbs, two bills introduced this year aim to make it easier to ticket riders and reduce the top speed of some models. AB 1942 would require certain e-bikes to be registered with the Department of Motor Vehicles and display license plates, and AB 1557 would slow e-bikes that children are allowed to operate. Both bills are still being reviewed in committee. If either bill passes this year, it will take effect Jan. 1.

Rebecca Watson covered this on YouTube

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The issue isn’t ebikes. The issue is electric motorcycles sold as ebikes without adequate breaks to kids without licenses.

Good. Existing laws have loopholes for “e-bikes”

By Echoez • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I don’t want to be “angry old man yelling at clouds” BUT ebikes exist in various grey areas of the current laws. Most of the modern bikes are not electric bikes; they are electric motorcycles and they should be treated as such. Here in NJ, we’ve had a slew of fatal accidents involving teens because of these loopholes. Riding on sidewalks (like a bike) but going 20-30mph. Or riding in traffic alongside cars, but not following traffic laws. Or the fact that they’re not wearing helmets.

If your vehicle can go a certain speed and you’re riding in traffic along with cars, you’re no longer a bike but a motorcycle. And that should require things like license plates, driver’s licenses, insurance, etc. ALTERNATIVELY, the bikes need to operate as bikes with similar speeds, only move when pedaling, ride on the side of the road, etc.

But right now, these vehicles are essentially electric motorcycles but kids ride them anyway under the guise that they are bikes.

Summary of the proposed ordinance

By edi_guy • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Class 1 e-bikes: Pedal-assist up to 20 mph. (Bill 1557 reduces to 16 mph)
Class 2 e-bikes: Throttle-assisted up to 20 mph. (Bill 1557 reduces to 16 mph; Bill 1942 requires license plate
Class 3 e-bikes: Pedal-assist up to 28 mph; riders must be 16 years or older and wear helmets; (Bill 1942 requires license plate)

In order to be classified as an eBike (aka bicycle) the peak motor power cannot exceed 750 watts, except for “cargo bikes”.

I use a regular bike, and hope to do so for a long time to come. But I do see older folks use eBikes, and of course the ubiquitous food delivery guys and young whipper-snappers. I am sure at some point I will also want to transition to the eBike.

The proposed laws mostly seem common sense to me, except for the requirement for a license plate on Class 2 eBikes. That seems pointless and excessive…maybe just a way to fund the program with extra $$. If bicycles are to share the same infrastructure and rules, they should be going the same speed.

As others have pointed out you can certainly get more powerful , two wheeled, electric vehicles. Just don’t call them ‘bikes’. They are mopeds or motorcycles or scooters. Already have rules for those, and they belong exclusively on the roadways, following normal auto regulations

Re:I don’t live in California but…

By ToasterMonkey • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… I suspect the police there have better things to do with their time than chase kids on ebikes across parks and playgrounds.

Obviously they’d rather be pulling easy overtime parked in front of some construction job than counting fish, but you still need game wardens. We had to register our dirt bikes out in rural BFE and they’d catch us if we didn’t, or sit at the empty truck parked next to the gravel pit and wait you out.

Ignoring the problems doesn’t help. Registration and classification need to happen, and it will happen in every state, it’s a matter of time. E-bikes are in a strange spot, not likely to start a grass fire so some old rules and conventions shouldn’t apply, but they can wreck a trail as bad as anything else, so some rules should. They’re not obnoxious sounding so that should open some unconventional paths, but they also have power output literally anywhere between pedal assist and motocross while sort of looking and sounding the same, and weighing anywhere in between. So in terms of damage they could do to trails, lawns, pedestrians, other trail users etc, it’s all over the place.

I get that we shouldn’t race to rules and regulations right away, because it might have stymied all that variety that we have right now, bikes would be made for different CA legal buckets and that could kill a lot of the different options we have. But dude.. putting a plate on them is the most obvious first step, it’s so the cops DON’T have to chase down every dumbass kid, we can take a picture of them cutting holes in the soccer field and get the ball rolling on trespassing charges quicker. Go look at any Facebook group for suburban anywhere and you’ll see what the problem is.

At the same time, we need more e-bike friendly trail options out in suburban areas, because it’s a great way to get kids outside and active, and off the places we don’t want them using these things. Like what we do for skaters.

Re:Outraged! Please help me sue California!

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

An e-bike with proportional assist can be ridden at bicycle speeds with little effort. If a person cannot make that level of effort, that person arguably cannot operate any bicycle in public. I have grown old, I know for a fact this is bullshit.

The Invisible Force Making Food Less Nutritious

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
fjo3 shares a report from the Washington Post:
Surging concentrations of carbon in the atmosphere, caused largely by burning fossil fuels, have produced potent changes in the way plants grow — from increasing their sugar content to depleting essential nutrients like zinc. Experts fear the degradation of Earth’s food supply will cause an epidemic of hidden hunger, in which even people who consume enough calories won’t get the nutrients they need to thrive. “The diets we eat today have less nutritional density than what our grandparents ate, even if we eat exactly the same thing,” said Kristie Ebi, a professor at the University of Washington’s Center for Health and the Global Environment.

People in wealthy countries with strong health care systems will have many tools to cope with the change, experts said. But for the world’s poorest and most vulnerable, the consequences could be devastating. One study concluded that by the middle of the century the phenomenon could put more than a billion additional women and children at risk of iron-deficiency anemia — a condition that can cause pregnancy complications, developmental problems and even death. Meanwhile, some 2 billion people across the globe who already suffer from some form of nutrient shortage could see their health problems grow even worse. “The scale of the problem is huge,” Ebi said.

Plants depend on carbon dioxide to perform photosynthesis — but that doesn’t mean they grow better when there’s more carbon in the air, scientists say. A sweeping survey of changes among 32 compounds in 43 crops found that nearly every plant that humans eat is harmed by rising CO2 levels. […] For the past several years, [Sterre F. ter Haar, an environmental scientist at Leiden University in the Netherlands and lead author of the survey] and her colleagues have worked to compile a database of all existing research on nutrient changes linked to rising CO2. They tracked down hundreds of studies, ranging from tightly controlled lab experiments to sprawling global analyses of real-world crops.

Next the team used their dataset to calculate the nutritional densities of each crop under different carbon dioxide levels — and to predict how their composition could continue to shift in the future. On average, they found, nutrients have already decreased by an average 3.2 percent across all plants since the late 1980s, when the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was about 350 parts per million. That figure may seem small, ter Haar said, but with so much of the world already living on the brink of nutrient insufficiency, a drop of just a few percentage points has the potential to push millions of additional people into a health crisis.
Researchers are still trying to understand the exact causes of this change. Extra CO2 can make plants grow faster and produce more carbohydrates, but without a matching increase in mineral uptake, nutrients like zinc, iron, and protein become diluted. Higher CO2 also causes plants to open their leaf pores less often, reducing the amount of water — and dissolved minerals — they absorb through their roots. At the same time, higher temperatures can further disrupt soil chemistry, affecting how plants take up nutrients and, in some cases, increasing their absorption of harmful substances like arsenic.

Re:This is misdirection

By T34L • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I’d like to ask what gives you the potent confidence to just go and voice easily debunakble falsehoods with literally nothing to back them up with?

You think that in the dozens of research articles done in last 30 years https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/a… literally nobody thought of controlling for this, with like, I don’t fucking know, fertilized substrate to test it on, which would entirely eliminate any effect of soil?

This has been reproduced in lab many times. CO2 richer atmosphere makes plants grow faster than plants in CO2 poorer atmosphere. They also absorb and retain fewer nutrients in the process, and you end up with plants with less micronutrients per unit of mass (and per joule of energy in starches and whatnot, which form fine).

Please, read about things you wanna talk about, or shut, the fuck, up!

Re:This is misdirection

By serafean • Score: 5, Informative Thread

People have been working on identifying this problem for 3 decades.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m…
https://elifesciences.org/arti…
https://www.politico.com/agend…

Yes, our fields are basically growing hydroponics now, but even when grown in healthy soils, you’ll grow junkier food than a century ago. Both are a problem, it compounds into mass silent malnutrition.

Re:This is misdirection

By T34L • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Researchers report that the CO2 levels expected in the second half of the 21st century will likely reduce the levels of zinc, iron, and protein in wheat, rice, peas, and soybeans. Some two billion people live in countries where citizens receive more than 60 per cent of their zinc or iron from these types of crops. Deficiencies of these nutrients already cause an estimated loss of 63 million life-years annually.

Also fuck you, I’m 100% pro GMO rice. I think at this point most major crops should be GMO.

Re:Serious question

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Obviously. But we also have a large number of people that cannot deal with any level of complexity beyond “simple problem” -> “simple fix!”.

The reality is there are no simple problems with simple fixes left. They have been solved. Everything we are dealing with now is complex. And that means that of 1000 ways to deal with something, 990 will only make things worse. But that is already a complex idea, and hence not accessible to those people.

Incidentally, that is why populist assholes are on the raise globally. They push the simple ideas with the simple fixes and tell people that all others (that actually try to deal with the complexity) are doing it wrong. And the simple minds find themselves comforted and vote for them. This universally has disastrous consequence. It has not worked one single time in human history because it cannot work. But learning from history is also a complex thing, and hence the cycle of self-inflicted decay continues.

Re:This is misdirection

By Krishnoid • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Close, but your information is a little old. The energy deficit you refer to is in the past, and the current problem is more of “micronutrient” deficiency.

Belgium Plans To Nationalize Nuclear Power Plants

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Belgium plans to buy its seven aging nuclear reactors from French power giant Engie in a “full takeover” aimed at securing domestic energy supplies, extending reactor operations, and developing new nuclear capacity. “The move would also mean suspending plans to decommission nuclear operations in Belgium,” reports the BBC. From the report:
The move would reverse the phase-out of nuclear energy legislation approved in the early 2000s amid safety concerns prohibiting the building of new nuclear power plants and limiting the operating lifetimes of existing ones to 40 years. Only two of Belgium’s seven nuclear reactors are operational - located at plants in Doel and in Tihange - and their operating licenses were recently extended until 2035. The other five reactors were shut between 2022 and 2025 and plans to dismantle them will now be suspended.

Engie and the government said they aim to reach an agreement on the takeover of the nuclear stations by October 1st. In a joint statement with Engie, the Belgian government said the move also highlights its aim to extend operations of existing nuclear reactors and to develop “new nuclear capacity” in Belgium. “By doing so, the Belgian Government is taking responsibility for Belgium’s long-term energy future, with the objective of building a financially and economically viable activity that supports security of supply, climate objectives, industrial resilience and socio-economic prosperity,” the statement adds.

Tihange is dangerous

By pahles • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I live relatively close to the Tihange plant (the plant is in Belgium, I live in the Netherlands). The reactor regularly automatically shuts down due to several issues. The concrete containment buildings are full of cracks, they are falling apart due to concrete degradation. Of one of those buildings the building plans have vanished.

Some years ago the Dutch government distributed iodine pills for everyone under the age of 18 who lives in a certain radius of the plant. The plant is old and should be shut down.

Re: happy

By bramez • Score: 4, Informative Thread

As a Belgian, I am not that happy about the idea of re-nationalizing TGEM with Engie.
The nuclear provisions fund (via Synatom) was supposed to cover decommissioning and waste. It was built up during decades when the plants were still public and nit profitable. But a big part of that money was lent back to Electrabel, which then could generate profits on it and pay dividends to Engie shareholders.
So profits where privatized, and now the longterm risks become public again. Restarting these plants will take additional billions in public money. And it is only needed during wintertime, in the summerthere is overcapacity because of renewables. So the nuclear sites will never be profitable again, and less and less so.

Re: happy

By aaarrrgggh • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I think the idea of power plants being “profitable” is part of the problem. Collectively Europe needs more winter generating capacity, preferably not reliant on imported energy. Your choices come down to coal or nuclear. If you are using them as low capacity factor sources, either is going to be expensive to run. A potential advantage of existing nuclear plants is that you have a 4-7 month window every year to phase upgrade projects. As upgrade requirements drop you have the potential for low-to-zero cost energy which can stimulate other industries such as vertical farming.

But long term one thing is clear for Europe: importing gas and oil are huge strategic risks that need to be addressed.

Good

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

As the USA has shown the more you privatize your nuclear fleet the worse off it gets. The regulatory environment by necessity has to be so stringent that you effectively create double work and there are just losses and inefficiency everywhere.

When we look at successful and expanding nuclear power in the past decades and right now in the present whats the common thread? State ownership.

France? Famously a state-owned-enterprise.
China? State-owned-enterprise, several of them actually. They have 2 that build plants and others than support them.
India? State-owned-enterprise.

Now is this the answer for all energy? No, renewables like wind and solar have done excellent with private investment because those make sense from an ROI and regulatory standpoint, nuclear just fails on both those standpoints. It takes too much money up front, takes too long to recoup and requires too much regulation to operate safely and it’s failure mode, although quite rare, is simply insane compared to other energy sources. Sure it’s a 0.001% of major problem but that major problem could destroy an entire economic region.

The other advantage of state-owned nuclear is that it is an easy lever for price stabilization in the energy market.

In Belgium.

By Voice of satan • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Part of the explanation is the antinuclear movement has lost a lot of steam in Belgium. The scientists were strongly against the phasing out of the nuclear plants but the full proportional parliamentarian system of Belgium gives to relatively small parties a role of kingmakers, which the green parties used to sabotage the nuclear industry.

In typical Belgian fashion, a nuclear phase-out was promised to the greens but delayed due date after due date because go figure, we need electricity. That policy, while hypocritical was not without effect: Since officially the plants were supposed to be phased out, they were not modernised and their maintenance was kept to the strict minimum.

To add insult to injury, the government instituted a “nuclear tax” that quite burned investors. So, it is moderately surprising Engie does not want to invest in expensive power plants. What they want is to sell gas. Cheap gas plants. This way you have little money immobilised in the country in case the government would go full retard again and want to tax them. And just import gas. So if Belgium ceases to be profitable, you disengage yourself by stopping to buy gas.

Of course, if you want to sell gas, it helps to have non dispatchable renewables so the grid goes unstable and you need gas plants as “backup”. When i was a young engineering student, our first year chemistry professor was an oil industry shill who gave us folders from Total. They advocated for wind energy. Not because Total is a company of hippies but because they knew with wind turbines they could sell fossil fuels.

Of course, this pseudo phase out turned out horribly wrong and the electricity penury went so dire old airplanes engines were used as auxiliary electricity generators. The cost of electricity skyrocketed and the CO2 emissions worsened.

Now, the greens are losing votes. I do not know how this decision will turn out. Competence and efficiency are not things the average Belgian voter find very important. But it is probably a good thing the electricity generation goes back to the public. The private sector is bad for these kind of things. The most successful electrical grids were made by public companies.

I also have a confession to make. I am an ancient member of the ECOLO party. The French-speaking green party. Shame on me. I projected my imagination on this kind of parties because i had learned about nature and the CO2 problem via my chemistry class in high school. So i stupidly assumed this party must have been full of concerned scientists.

Nothing was farther from the truth. They were almost all wash-outs with always the same two bullshit degrees and had zero interest in nature. They hated maths. They hated scientists whom they perceived as arrogant. They frowned at me when i talked to them about the greenhouse effect. At the time, it was a preoccupation of science minded people and my dumb party buddies had not heard of it and told me in no uncertain terms they had zero interest in it. I was lectured on the fact that political ecology was not about whales a little flowers and had deep ideologically pure left wing roots and i had to be loyal to that.

They were just a party of vaguely anticapitalist, anti-industry people who could not balance a chemical equation to save their lives. One of the founders was a doctor in physics who ended up dying of COVID because he refused to vaccinate. Another executive was an agronomist and it is all i remember. Then i left the party. Then i left the country (for other reasons)

Musk Concludes Testimony At OpenAI Trial

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC:
Elon Musk wrapped up his testimony on Thursday as the trial in his lawsuit against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman continued into its fourth day. OpenAI’s attorney, William Savitt, cross-examined Musk in the morning. He asked Musk about the capped nature of Microsoft’s investments in OpenAI, his involvement in negotiations about the company’s structure, and whether he knew about the OpenAI nonprofit’s recent initiatives. “I don’t know what’s going on at OpenAI,” Musk testified.

Savitt also asked Musk about his competing artificial intelligence startup, xAI. While not the main focus of the case, Musk said it is “partly” true that xAI used some of OpenAI’s models to train its own models, a process known as distilling. Musk also suggested that xAI has used OpenAI’s technology to help build the company. Musk sued OpenAI, Altman, and Greg Brockman, the company’s president, in 2024, alleging that they went back on their commitments to keep the artificial intelligence company a nonprofit and to follow its charitable mission. He claims that the roughly $38 million he donated to seed OpenAI, a company he co-founded, was used for unauthorized commercial purposes.

Once Musk wrapped up his testimony after roughly two hours of questioning on Thursday, his attorneys called Jared Birchall, who manages Musk’s billions at his family office, as their next witness. Birchall testified about his knowledge of Musk’s specific donations to OpenAI. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers oversaw the proceedings from federal court in Oakland, California. The trial will resume on Monday.
Recap:
Elon Musk Says OpenAI Betrayed Him, Clashes With Company’s Attorney (Day Three)
Musk Testifies OpenAI Was Created As Nonprofit To Counter Google (Day Two)
Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Head To Court (Day One)

TF

By ArmoredDragon • Score: 3 Thread

This is the OJ trial, slashdot edition.

Hard to take it seriously

By hdyoung • Score: 3 Thread
Musk tried playing the fragile, wronged champion-of-humanity, trying to tell a story about how the Evil Sam Altman snookered him into thinking that OpenAI would always be nonprofit and put humanity first. He practically gave the testimony with tears streaming down his face.

He does NOT pull off that look very well.

It’s hard to take him seriously about the harms of AI when Grok is the #1 LLM for Nazi propaganda and fabricating revenge porn. I know people who use Grok for real work. But it doesn’t exactly prioritize human well-being

US Senators Ban Themselves From Prediction Markets Trading

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
The U.S. Senate unanimously passed a rule banning senators from trading on prediction markets effective immediately. CNBC reports:
The move came amid rising concern about insider trading on prediction market platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket, and about event contracts that can involve death or violence. On April 22, Kalshi said it had suspended and fined one U.S. Senate candidate and two candidates for the House of Representatives for political insider trading on their own campaigns.

Earlier on Thursday, a group of Democratic members of Congress called on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to issue a rule “that prevents insider trading and corruption in the market and prohibits event contracts on the outcome of elections, war and military actions in the U.S. or abroad, sports, and government actions without a valid economic hedging interest.” Kalshi and Polymarket both praised the Senate’s action.
“I applaud the Senate for passing this resolution to ban Senators and their offices from trading on prediction markets,” Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour wrote in a post on X. “Kalshi already proactively blocks members of congress and enforces against insider trading. This is a great step to increase trust in our markets by making it an industry standard,” Mansour said. “Now, let’s pass this in the House!”

Polymarket, in its own post on X, said, “We’re in full support of this. Our Rulebook & Terms of Service already prohibit such conduct, but codifying this into law is a step forward for the industry. Happy to help move this forward however we can.”

Pinky Swear!

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This is an internal rule not a law.

It is enforceable via self-policing (committee investigates and votes on guilt and recommends penalties to the chamber). Like most rules violations, the penalties are variable (pay a fine? expulsion? somewhere in between?). The Senate Rules Committee can also quietly choose not to renew this rule at any time in the future.

It is a good thing… but don’t read too much into it. It is a gesture.

Re:Pinky Swear!

By algaeman • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It’s only illegal if you’re a democrat.

Re:Pinky Swear!

By mADneSs • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Also doesn’t appear to ban spouse/family members from placing bets either. And there’s always the ‘friend loophole’. And even after all of that, it’s still open season on insider stock trading.

Re:Pinky Swear!

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Some senators, like Mark Kelly, have been trying to pass a ban on any stock trading by senators at all… but it hasn’t gotten a lot of traction, so many of them don’t want to give up their sweet sweet insider profits.

Re:Pinky Swear!

By geekmux • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s only illegal if you’re a democrat.

Thats rich, considering the spokesperson for Congressional Insider Trading is on hell of an infamous Democrat.

Remember when Pelosi had the nerve to defend that corrupt shit as a fucking job perk?

Her net worth certainly remembers. So does every professional investor she made look like an amateur.