Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Google News Now Prominently Featuring Polymarket Bets
  2. Google Rolls Out Gmail End-To-End Encryption On Mobile Devices
  3. France’s Government Is Ditching Windows For Linux
  4. AI Is Coming for Car Salesmen
  5. Meta Removes Ads For Social Media Addiction Litigation
  6. Particles Seen Emerging From Empty Space For First Time
  7. US Fertility Rate Falls To All-Time Low
  8. ‘Negative’ Views of Broadcom Driving Thousands of VMware Migrations, Rival Says
  9. Mozilla Accuses Microsoft of Sabotaging Firefox With Windows and Copilot Tactics
  10. Amazon May Sell Trainium AI Chips To Third Parties In Shot At Nvidia
  11. OpenAI To Limit New Model Release On Cybersecurity Fears
  12. Hacker Steals 10 Petabytes of Data From China’s Tianjin Supercomputer Center
  13. EFF Is Leaving X
  14. Waymo Is Offering To Help Cities Fix Their Potholes
  15. Skilled Older Workers Turn To AI Training To Stay Afloat

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Google News Now Prominently Featuring Polymarket Bets

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Futurism found that Google News is surfacing Polymarket betting pages alongside traditional news sources. “The bets often appear in the ‘For you’ section of Google News, which is tailored to a user’s personal interests,” the publication reports. “In one instance, it was even the very top result, as with this bet on the price of Bitcoin.” From the report:
In our testing, Polymarket bets are also showing up on the Google News home page. But links from the prediction market can pop up all over Google News, including in searches. In further tests, looking up “will ships transit the strait,” referring to the Strait of Hormuz, returned numerous credible sources like Financial Times, The Guardian, and Reuters. Just below them, however, was a Polymarket bet on the number of ships that would be allowed to pass through the critical oil passageway.

This doesn’t appear to be an accident. When searching “Polymarket” in its search bar, Google News now allows users to choose it as a “source,” directing them to a page that aggregates other Polymarket hits. It’s not the only non-news site that’s selectable as a source — looking up “Reddit” and “X” offers the option, too — but searching for “Kalshi,” another prediction market and Polymarket’s main competitor, doesn’t give the option to use it as a source. […] In light of all this, Polymarket appearing in Google News is a major victory for the prediction platform — rubber-stamping its image as an authority on developing real-world events right alongside genuine real publishers of journalism.

Just use Duck Duck Go

By jenningsthecat • Score: 3 Thread

I end up doing about 15% of my searches on Google, because DDG has some serious deficiencies. But DDG doesn’t feed me polymarket crap, and it even provides a URL which dispenses with the AI bullshit altogether.

It’s long past time for people to start punishing Google for all their anti-society crap by just not using their services. At this point the world would be better off if Google just died.

Google Rolls Out Gmail End-To-End Encryption On Mobile Devices

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Gmail’s end-to-end encryption is now available on all Android and iOS devices, letting enterprise users send and read encrypted emails directly in the app without any extra tools. “This launch combines the highest level of privacy and data encryption with a user-friendly experience for all users, enabling simple encrypted email for all customers from small businesses to enterprises and public sector,” Google announced in a blog post. BleepingComputer reports:
Starting this week, encrypted messages will be delivered as regular emails to Gmail recipients’ inboxes if they use the Gmail app. Recipients who don’t have the Gmail mobile app and use other email services can read them in a web browser, regardless of the device and service they’re using.

[…] This feature is now available for all client-side encryption (CSE) users with Enterprise Plus licenses and the Assured Controls or Assured Controls Plus add-on after admins enable the Android and iOS clients in the CSE admin interface via the Admin Console. Gmail’s end-to-end encryption (E2EE) feature is powered by the client-side encryption (CSE) technical control, which allows Google Workspace organizations to use encryption keys they control and are stored outside Google’s servers to protect sensitive documents and emails.

Client

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
E2E doesn’t matter very much if you also control the client.

France’s Government Is Ditching Windows For Linux

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
France says it plans to move some government computers from Windows to Linux as part of a broader push for digital sovereignty and reduced dependence on U.S. technology. TechCrunch reports:
In a statement, French minister David Amiel said (translated) that the effort was to “regain control of our digital destiny” by relying less on U.S. tech companies. Amiel said that the French government can no longer accept that it doesn’t have control over its data and digital infrastructure. The French government did not provide a specific timeline for the switchover, or which distributions it was considering. Microsoft did not immediately comment on the news.

[…] France’s decision to ditch Windows comes months after the government announced it would stop using Microsoft Teams for video conferencing in favor of French-made Visio, a tool based on the open source end-to-end encrypted video meeting tool Jitsi. The French government said it also plans to migrate its health data platform to a new trusted platform by the end of the year.

Re:gotta catch ‘em all

By echo123 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

France says it plans to move some government computers from Windows to Linux as part of a broader push for digital sovereignty and reduced dependence on U.S. technology. TechCrunch reports:
In a statement, French minister David Amiel said (translated) that the effort was to “regain control of our digital destiny”

He forgot the word “partial”

If they want that control they need to at least divest from ALL use of Microsoft “solutions” and possibly also build their own Linux distribution.

In 2026, given the current state of Linux software and distributions, I don’t see what is so hard about switching the vast majority of common office computers.

Re:We’ve heard this before

By RamenMan • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Munich was a bit ahead of its time with their efforts.

In 2026, it doesn’t really matter what OS you run- most of what people do is through the browser. The OS as an app platform is no longer consequential.

After 30+ years of relying on Windows, I moved to Ubuntu about 6 months ago. The amount of regret I’ve had is zero. When I need to work on a Microsoft Office document, the online versions are completely fine. Even Adobe products, which used to be some of the most important ‘heavy’ apps have tons of online tools.

Linux has gotten to a really good place now and is a completely capable replacement for Windows for users at any level. Even non-technical users could move over without any problems. I think that France is doing this at a time where it really make sense, while Munich was more at the cutting edge.

The time really is finally here.

Re:We’ve heard this before

By znrt • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Munich was a bit ahead of its time with their efforts.

In 2026, it doesn’t really matter what OS you run- most of what people do is through the browser. The OS as an app platform is no longer consequential.

that’s quite true but sadly not for public administrative work which tends to rely heavily on legacy sw, specific document templates and workflows, etc. it’s a lot of fine detail with devils in it. today such a transition could probably be easier, but still not straightforward. i would guess the far stronger success factor today would be motivation: munich was ahead of its time and purely based on the ideal of achieving a clean open administration standard which is a good thing per-se, with the concern just being that ms is a private corporation, not as much that it is a private corporation controlled by a rogue or sometimes directly hostile state. anyway, let’s see.

Re:gotta catch ‘em all

By Murdoch5 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It’s true, but, it’s a bad reason. If you can honestly tell me that the Windows UX / UI is easier, friendlier, simpler, and more inviting than KDE, or Gnome, why? In my opinion, KDE and Gnome as vastly more usable than the thing Windows uses as a desktop. How long would the training really take? 10-minutes?

Re:Educated guess

By MeNeXT • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s going to take 25 years. 10 years to end long-term agreements with Microsoft, 10 years to transition and another 5 years of pain and suffering while trying to use Linux as a reliable desktop before realising that they need to switch back to Windows.

I don’t think you know the meaning of the word reliable.

  Windows is proprietary. In my experience Windows is not as reliable as Linux.

AI Is Coming for Car Salesmen

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Drive:
An auto dealer software company is pitching AI-powered kiosks designed to replace car salesmen on showroom floors. Automotive News says the industry is “skeptical.” But be honest — would you really rather deal with the average car lot shark than a computer?

Epikar, a South Korean company that cooks up digital management solutions for car dealers, has named its new AI invention the Pikar Genie. The idea is that customers can talk to this device, ask it product questions, and basically do everything you’d do with a car salesman except for actually closing the deal and signing paperwork. Renault, BMW, and Volvo are already using some Epikar products at South Korean dealerships, but this new customer-facing AI product is still in its infancy.

AN reported that “Renault assigns three salespeople to its Seoul showroom enhanced with Epikar automation compared with six for other Renault showrooms in South Korea,” according to Epikar CEO Bosuk Han. The company’s now looking to expand into America and is apparently already testing its products at at least one dealership stateside.
Car-dealer consultant Fleming Ford (Director of Strategic Growth at NCM Associates) said U.S. dealerships “aren’t ready for fully automated showrooms.”
“The showroom isn’t just where you buy a car,” Automotive News quoted him saying. “It’s where you decide who to trust to help you to choose the right car.”

Different dealers competing for your business?

By schwit1 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Today I can ask a handful of dealers ‘what’s the best price you can give me for that car’ and have them bid against each other. Different dealers’ AIs will be talking to each other to ensure you pay the maximum.

How about?

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

How about I just log on to Ford or whoever’s website and just order what I want? That sounds best to me.

Profit motives and Sales

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The car dealer isn’t looking to get you into the right car for you, they’re looking to get you into the right for them. And they’re a business, you expect that. The traditional issue is that car salesmen have zero shame about using every social engineering trick in the book to pressure you into spending more than you care to.

An AI kiosk won’t be able to do that to anywhere near the same degree - the dealer will save on commissions but lose on sales.

Re: Neither

By Old Man Kensey • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
You can pretty much do that now if you have an account at most credit unions. Most subscribe to some form of car-buying service like TrueCar as a free member benefit, which includes pulling free history reports on the vehicles you’re looking at. The listed price is guaranteed at the dealership. I bought my last three cars that way and barring some major event it’s the only way I ever will again.

Re:Interesting cut off point

By thevirtualcat • Score: 5, Funny Thread

On the flip side, a hallucinating AI will probably still be more honest than your average car salesman.

Meta Removes Ads For Social Media Addiction Litigation

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta has started removing ads from law firms seeking clients for social media addiction lawsuits, just weeks after a jury found Meta and YouTube negligent in a landmark case involving harm to a young user. “Lawyers across the country now are seeking new plaintiffs, in the hopes of bringing a class action lawsuit that could result in lucrative verdicts,” reports Axios. From the report:
Axios has identified more than a dozen such ads that were deactivated today, some of which came from large national firms like Morgan & Morgan and Sokolove Law. Almost all of them ran on both Facebook and Instagram. Some also appeared on Threads and Messenger, plus Meta’s Audience Network — which distributes ads to thousands of third-party sites.

One such ad read: “Anxiety. Depression. Withdrawal. Self-harm. These aren’t just teenage phases — they’re symptoms linked to social media addiction in children. Platforms knew this and kept targeting kids anyway.” A few of the ads still remain active, including some that were posted earlier today.
“We’re actively defending ourselves against these lawsuits and are removing ads that attempt to recruit plaintiffs for them,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. “We will not allow trial lawyers to profit from our platforms while simultaneously claiming they are harmful.”

Well… Wouldn’t You?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I feel really awkward, seemingly defending Meta. But, wouldn’t you refuse to run ads that targeted you for lawsuits, maligned your business, and threatened your existence?

My question is; who authorized those ads in the first place? How fired is the dipshit former Meta employee that ran ads that seek to destroy Meta?

Re:Well… Wouldn’t You?

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Depends. If Meta has a defacto monopoly on ads in its social media ecosystem, then it’s not reasonable for it to censor ads directly attacking it.

Re:Well… Wouldn’t You?

By ledow • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Like there’s a guy who’s moderating the ads?

I’ve previously reported any amount of utterly illegal, misleading, out-right lies, etc. ads on Facebook in the past and nobody cares. They take your report and then a month later they tell you that they found no violation.

The only moderation they do for advertisers is “Enter your credit card details”.

It’s kind of the reason they’re in this mess in the first place.

Bad Logic

By Spinlock_1977 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

“We will not allow trial lawyers to profit from our platforms while simultaneously claiming they are harmful.”

Why not? That’s where all the harmed people are.

I’m impressed…

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I didn’t know that there was a class of ads that facebook wouldn’t touch; they are legendarily flexible so long as the advertiser is paying.

Particles Seen Emerging From Empty Space For First Time

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot shares a report from NewScientist:
According to quantum chromodynamics (QCD) — widely considered to be our best theory for describing the strong force, which binds quarks inside protons and neutrons — even a perfect vacuum isn’t truly empty. Instead, it is filled with short-lived disturbances in the underlying energy of space that flicker in and out of existence, known as virtual particles. Among them are quark-antiquark pairs. Under normal conditions, these fleeting pairs vanish almost as soon as they appear. But if enough energy is injected into a vacuum, QCD predicts they can be promoted into real, detectable particles with measurable mass. Now, the STAR collaboration — an international team of physicists working at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider in Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York state — has observed this process for the first time.

The team smashed together high-energy protons in a vacuum, producing a spray of particles. Some of these particles should be quark-antiquark pairs pulled directly from the vacuum itself, but quarks can never exist alone and immediately combine into composite particles. Quarks and antiquarks are born with their spins correlated — a shared quantum alignment inherited from the vacuum. The researchers found that this link persists even after the quarks and antiquarks become part of larger particles called hyperons, which decay in less than a tenth of a billionth of a second. Spotting these spin-aligned hyperons in the aftermath of the proton collisions allowed the researchers to confirm that the quarks within them came from the vacuum.
The findings have been published in the journal Nature.

Skimmed the article..

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

They created stuff by using a strong force to ram a Hardon to into a tube ?

I’m no physics guy, but how is that new?

Re:They Didn’t Find “Something From Nothing

By locofungus • Score: 5, Informative Thread

They smashed protons together at relativistic energies and found particles in the debris. That’s not “particles emerging from empty space” â" that’s particles emerging from a high-energy collision.

That’s not how I read it (although I’m also only relying on the summary)

I read it as:

It’s a given in the standard model that even in a perfect vacuum at absolute zero virtual (pairs of) particles are constantly being created and destroyed. While we can detect some side effects of that, the particles themselves cannot be detected or measured but we know that these virtual pairs must obey certain “rules” and, in particular, must be correlated in particular ways.

However, provide enough energy and those virtual pairs of particles can become real. When they become real they still have to obey the constraints that the virtual particles had to have.

What they have done here (assuming I’ve understood enough) is to provide enough energy so that the virtual particles can become real (surely this isn’t surprising) and, additionally, detected the required correlations that the virtual particles made real must have.

I know nowhere near enough to know how they distinguished these virtual pairs made real from coincidence pairs created through “normal” proton-proton collisions but I assume that’s covered in their paper.

Re:Skimmed the article..

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Funny Thread

They created stuff by using a strong force to ram a Hardon to into a tube ?

I think this comment would also apply in the previous story about the declining birthrates.

Re:They Didn’t Find “Something From Nothing

By domonus • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
You’ve described how the calculation works, not what happens. QCD gives correct amplitudes — nobody disputes that. But ‘virtual particles popping in and out of existence’ is narrative layered on top of a perturbation expansion, not a conclusion derived from it. You can spend an entire career computing within the framework, publishing papers, winning grants, and never once ask whether the story that dresses up the math is actually derivable from the math.

Re:God knows. Maybe literally.

By OrangAsm • Score: 5, Funny Thread
The main problem is that the scientists are inside the universe. I doubt we’ll figure any shit out until one is removed from the universe. I suggest we start with someone that knows more than any scientist: RFK Jr.

US Fertility Rate Falls To All-Time Low

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR:
Women in the U.S. gave birth to roughly 710,000 fewer children last year compared with the nation’s peak in 2007, according to preliminary data released (PDF) this week by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lead researcher Brady Hamilton, a demographer with the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics, said the latest one percent drop in “general fertility” from 2024 to 2025 is part of a long-running downward trend. “Since 2007, there’s been a decline in the general fertility rate [in the U.S.] of 23%,” Hamilton told NPR.

The impact of that change in real numbers is sizable: In 2007, there were 4,316,233 babies born. Last year, even though the nation’s population as a whole is larger, there were only 3,606,400 newborns. There’s no consensus over why women and couples have shifted their behavior so significantly. Some experts point to economic factors, others say cultural influences, and better access to education and contraception for women are driving the change.
“We’re seeing big drops in fertility rates for young women, teenagers and women in their 20s,” said economist Martha Bailey, head of the California Center for Population Research at the University of California, Los Angeles. “What’s not yet clear is whether or not those same women will go on to have children later on.”
“People are having the number of children they want and that they can afford at a time that makes the most sense for them,” she said. “What I don’t think anyone is in favor of is a Handmaid’s Tale type policy regime, where we’re trying to talk families into having children they don’t want.”

One silver lining in the data is the 7% decline in teen pregnancies in 2025. Bianca Allison, pediatrician and associate professor at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, said: “What is actually affecting the birth rates are likely lower rates of teen pregnancy overall, which is in the context of higher use of contraception and lower sexual activity for youth, and then also continued access to abortion care.”

Re:Porn

By Sique • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Only a racist cares about “ethnic replacement”. Because only a racist is compelled to classify people living in the same social environment into different ethnicities, and he completely ignores people from different backgrounds having children together, because in his mind, this is an abomination and shall not happen[tm].

Re:Porn

By Rei • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

By not spending all their time grouping people into different “races” and judging them by their stereotypes of said races as invariant characteristics of not only first-generation immigrants, but all descendants therefrom, despite the latter growing up in your society, while freaking out about any change, as though every society is constantly changing, let alone one that specifically formed as a melting pot that prided itself on inviting everyone in?

Not that there haven’t always been racists.

1840s-1880s: “F***ing Irish!”
1850s-1940s: “F***ing Chinese!”
1880s-1920s: “F***ing Italians! F***ing Slavs! F***ing Jews!”
1890s-1940s: “F***ing Japanese!”
1914-1920: “F***ing Germans!”
Late 1800s-Present: “F***ing Mexicans!”
1970s-Present: “F***ing Muslims!”

Who do you think will be next, while the previous groups become “normal” in the US? How many people of Italian descent do you see going around speaking Italian and living as if it were Italy in the early 1900s? In general, often even in the second generation, and esp. by third and beyond, immigrants’ origins generally just becomes a historic fact rather than a daily lived thing. There may be some signature dish that you cook, or you may have a dream to some day visit the country your ancestors came from, or you (might) still be the religion of your ancestors, or whatnot. But you speak the local language, your hobbies are and interests by and large in-distribution for the country, your education was the same standardized education, etc. And over time, due to intermarriage, ancestry increasingly becomes diverse and less defining - “I’m X% Irish, Y% English, Z% Italian…” etc. Skin colour or part of the world doesn’t change it. Ever met a south Asian-ancestry Brit? They’re not out there talking like a call centre operator from New Delhi and eating curry every day, they’re eating at Nandos and calling each other “bruv” and the like.

This is how all “peoples” form. Do you think there just happened to be 143 million people defining themselves as “Russian” living across this massive landmass? No - the Russian empire conquered a massive diverse range of people, and then assimilated them to be “Russians”, through education, intermarriage, etc. At least in the US people are living there willingly and had a choice in the matter.

It’s like this everywhere. Do you think there just happened to be a people called “The English”? No, there were Gaelic peoples there, then Romans, then Angles and Saxons, then vikings, and on and on. Flows of people are the nature of history, both during wartime and peacetime. I’m as white as they come, but genetic tests show a tiny bit of African ancestry - from a percentage basis, maybe back into the 1600-1700s - because hey, there were “Moors” in Europe then too. “Most” genetics in Iceland sees Y chromosomes *mainly* showing Scandinavian roots and mitochondria *mainly* showing British isles roots, but there’s also, for example, a not insignificant bit of Greenlandic genetics here.

Even the most isolated places in the world see a free flow of genetics. Tristan da Cunha is considered the most remote settlement on Earth, with its 238 people. Boats only arrive once every few months, and to visit you have to get special permission from the Island Council. There were 7 surnames on the island, from the island’s original male settlers. This expanded to 10 in the 1960s after some islanders intermarried during an evacuation due to the island’s volcano. But genetics show the presence of an Eastern European ancestor from the early 1900s, possibly from a Russian sailing ship. Even on the most remote place on Earth, genetic flow exists - and it does not harm a damned thing, and is in fact, very much a good thing.

And culture flows even easier than genetics. Culture is constantly changing, radic

Re:Feminism - it’s about getting even, never equal

By Samantha Wright • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I can’t comment on your masculinity. I don’t know you. But it seems like you’re wounded, so let’s cauterize it.

In a very strange sense, it is true that males are disposable, but this fact is built into sexual reproduction by evolution itself. In virtually all species, if one parent is responsible for carrying offspring and the other isn’t, then by definition the former parent is anchored longer in the reproductive act, and is thus in need of protection during that period.

Mammals in particular have an “experimental male, stable female” genetic strategy where more pronounced variation in traits (height, academic performance, et cetera) is presented in males. With each generation these traits then get folded back into the matrilineal trunk, which is less affected by them. This specifically happens with traits on the X chromosome via Barr body inactivation.

So there’s one answer that you can settle on, if you want to feel really shitty. You are disposable. Society isn’t responsible for this, though. The game was rigged tens of millions of years ago when some fucking fish somewhere evolved live birth. Unless you’re a salmon, you’ve drawn the short straw.

But there are a couple of other angles worth considering.

First of all—who is doing the disposal of all these men? Women aren’t the ones declaring wars, or cheaping out on safety equipment, or blocking legislation that reduces gun violence. We didn’t invent conscription and we didn’t bomb the World Trade Center. I mean, fuck, Pete Hegseth is systematically firing female generals and wants to stop women from volunteering to serve in the military, even if they meet all the physical requirements for service. These bloodthirsty assholes are the ones actually killing you, and they should be your #1 enemy. All of these problems are reduced by a factor of ten just by moving to Canada, where the reproductive laws are basically the same as any blue state.

Now, as for reproductive politics… I used to be a fairly left-libertarian person on this issue and felt that the real problem was that people are immature assholes to each other. It seemed to me that custody and child disputes only happen at all because the people involved had shitty parents, and that the only solution was to get rid of societal expectations; live and let live, make it easier for single moms to get good jobs so they don’t need alimony in the first place. (Another "-mony” word, but this time from -monia, “condition,” + alo, “nourishment.”) But these days it’s pretty damn clear to just about everyone that the last thing civilization needs is yet more isolation and atomisation.

I think the actual solution is to turn parenting into a social obligation. It’s a little different from how things are now, but I think the benefits would be worth it.

Consider the consequences of what would happen if made the following into a moral principle: your parents’ generation raised you, so you have a duty to raise the next generation. In this system, every adult is expected to have and raise 2 kids, or contribute the equivalent amount of work to paideia by helping to raise the kids of strangers, teaching, tutoring, babysitting, et cetera. This would have the additional benefits of making childcare cheaper, reducing the work parents actually have to do alone, and reducing the power and scope of serial child abusers (can’t hurt a lot of kids if positions of power over them aren’t a viable career.) Experts would still exist for key jobs like high school teachers.

Parents still get to choose who they hire to help raise their kids, so you don’t have to worry about some weirdo brainwashing them. Since virtually every adult is going through the labor pool, there’s a ton of choice. Both parents and helpers would be anonymized during this selection process to reduce biases around gender, appearance, etc.

The enforcement is as follows

Re: Porn

By IDemand2HaveSumBooze • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s not quite so simple. The most rural countries with lowest levels of education have the highest fertility rates, those countries also tend to be the poorest. If you look here, at first glance it does indeed look like the poorest countries have the highest fertility rates and vice versa. If you look a little closer at the bottom of the list though, you’ll see very rich nations like Japan and South Korea alongside less wealthy ones like Ukraine, Belarus, (arguably) Poland and the Baltic states. In Ukraine’s case the war is obviously a factor, but still you see what I mean.

If you live on a small farm in a non-developed nation, without indoor plumbing or electricity, raising children is cheap. You just need enough food to feed them. Your large extended family which lives nearby, maybe even in the same house, will help with raising very young children. Then when they’re even slightly older they can start helping with with farm work which needs less strength as well as looking after even younger siblings. When they’ve grown up they may be able to provide for you when you get old, because there may be no functioning state welfare. That’s what happens in the sub-Saharan African nations and other very rural nations with the highest fertility rates.

When you live in the city though, raising children is expensive. Your family likely lives far away from you and can’t help with raising them. You have to spend most of your time working in an office somewhere. In the meantime you have to pay for childcare, which in developed nations tends to be very expensive if not subsidised by the government. The expectation of money you need to spend on clothing, school expenses etc for the children is so much higher in developed countries. A lot of lower earning young couples will simply not be able to afford having 2+ young children at the same time. If you wait until your one child grows up and leaves the nest until you have another, at that point you may be too old and no longer able to have children. That’s especially considering that couples often won’t start having children until they’ve completed their university education and got a long-term job and some financial security.

Very wealthy people in developed nations will often have large families - see Musk, Trump, Zuckerberg. When money is not a concern, many people will choose to have large families.

Re: Porn

By Alypius • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Only Western countries

‘Negative’ Views of Broadcom Driving Thousands of VMware Migrations, Rival Says

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“One of VMware’s biggest competitors, Nutanix, claims to have swiped tens of thousands of VMware customers,” reports Ars Technica. They said higher prices, forced bundling, licensing changes, and more strained partner relationships have frustrated customers and driven them away from the leading virtualization firm. From the report:
Speaking at a press briefing at Nutanix’s .NEXT conference in Chicago this week, Nutanix CEO Rajiv Ramaswami said that “about 30,000 customers” have migrated from VMware to the rival platform, pointing to customer disapproval over Broadcom’s VMware strategy, SDxCentral, a London-based IT publication, reported today. “I think there’s no doubt that the customer sentiment continues to be negative about Broadcom,” Ramaswami said, per SDxCentral.

Nutanix hasn’t specified how many of the customers that it got from VMware are SMBs or enterprise-sized; although, adoption is said to be strongest among mid-market customers as Nutanix also tries wooing larger customers, often by starting with partial deployments. During this week’s press briefing, Ramaswami reportedly said that some of the customers that moved from VMware to Nutanix during the latter’s most recent fiscal quarter represented Nutanix’s “strongest quarterly new logo additions in eight years.” “Most of the logos came from our typical VMware migrations on to the [hyperconverged infrastructure] platform,” he said.

During the Nutanix conference, Brandon Shaw, Nutanix VP and head of technology services, said that Western Union has been migrating from VMware to Nutanix for six months, The Register reported. The financial services company is moving 900 to 1,200 applications across 3,900 cores. Shaw said that Western Union has been exploring new IT suppliers to help it become more customer-focused. Despite Broadcom’s history of “decent lines of communication” with Western Union, Shaw said that Western Union had “challenges partnering with them.”

Shaw also pointed to Broadcom’s efforts to push customers to buy the VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF), despite the product often having more features than companies need and at high prices. Since moving to Nutanix, the Denver-headquartered financial firm is also benefiting from having more flexibility around workload locations, which is important since Western Union is in over 200 countries, The Register said.

Swiped Customers? Funny!

By oldgraybeard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
They drove customers away with the changes and price increases. TBH only the willing captives are using VMware at this point.

Proxmox FTW

By robpoe • Score: 3 Thread

Having been out of the game for a while I’m very surprised and pleased about proxmox and it’s functionality gains, especially with ceph instead of big expensive SAN units.

Re:Swiped Customers? Funny!

By jhoegl • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
To be fair to broadcom (I know… give me a little space on this), they said that is what they wanted.
Essentially, VMWare went to “for everyone!” to “If you have to ask the price, you cant afford it”.
VMware was developed to help share server resources and reduce physical server need.
Broadcom thinks you should pay for the physical server without the physical server, not just once, but every year you have their software.

The sad thing is, they sit on patents that they will do nothing with, but charge others for.

Yes, Migrate from Vmware

By 89cents • Score: 5, Informative Thread

In researching this, the main choices were basically Nutanix or Proxmox. Since Proxmox was free/open source, I went to try that out.

I have replaced 2 of our smaller VMWare systems for Proxmox and like it so far. Ceph integration is basically vSAN, raiding storage across multiple servers, so don’t need a SAN or RAID cards. Next will be our main system.

Broadcom

By JThundley • Score: 5, Funny Thread

It got so bad that I even stopped pirating it!

Mozilla Accuses Microsoft of Sabotaging Firefox With Windows and Copilot Tactics

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Mozilla is accusing Microsoft of stacking the deck against Firefox, arguing that design choices in Windows steer users toward Edge even when they explicitly choose another browser. According to Mozilla, parts of Windows still open links in Edge regardless of the default browser setting, including results from the taskbar search and links launched from apps like Outlook and Teams. Mozilla says this means Firefox often never even gets the opportunity to handle those links, which quietly shifts user activity back into Microsoft’s ecosystem.

The company also points to Microsoft’s aggressive rollout of Copilot as another example of platform power being used to push Microsoft services. Copilot appeared pinned to the taskbar, arrived automatically on many systems with Microsoft 365, and even received a dedicated keyboard key on some laptops. Mozilla argues that when the maker of the dominant desktop operating system promotes its own browser and AI tools at the system level, it becomes far harder for independent browsers like Firefox to compete.

Re:Wait so you expect me to believe

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Actually, when mobile devices are thrown into the mix, the OS market share breaks down like this:

As of December 2025, Android, which uses the Linux kernel, is the world’s most popular operating system with 38.94% of the global market, followed by Windows with 29.99%, iOS with 15.66%, macOS with 2.14%, and other operating systems with 10.78%.

Microsoft may still command the lion’s share of OS installations in the PC desktop market, but the PC desktop market is now a minority portion of the installed computing base. The question Mozilla should be asking is why aren’t people using Firefox on Android.

To be fair

By jrnvk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I am certain Microsoft sabotaged their own products way more than anything else with their CoPilot shenanigans.

Re:Wait so you expect me to believe

By dskoll • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I use Firefox on Android as my main mobile browser. It’s fine. A bit slower than Chrome, but I’ll put up with that to avoid Google spyware. (Though… being on Android, maybe I’ve lost already. Still, don’t want to make it easier than it has to be.)

Re:Wait so you expect me to believe

By mdhoover • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Indeed I do, with ad blockers because with firefox you can.

Re:Wait so you expect me to believe

By fred6666 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Firefox on Android is great. It has all important features:

1. Allow ad blockers
2. Password/history sync with desktop browser
3. Not specific to one vendor, run on almost everything (Android, Windows, Linux, etc.)
4. Not some flavor of the month browser (typically chromium fork) that won’t exist anymore in 6 months
5. Respects my privacy

Plus it’s open source and not run by an evil corporation.

Amazon May Sell Trainium AI Chips To Third Parties In Shot At Nvidia

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy says the company may eventually sell its Trainium AI chips directly to outside customers, not just through AWS, which would put Amazon in more direct competition with Nvidia. “There’s so much demand for our chips that it’s quite possible we’ll sell racks of them to third parties in the future,” Jassy wrote in his annual shareholder letter Thursday. He also revealed the company’s chip business is already running at more than $20 billion annually, with demand so strong that current and even future generations are largely spoken for. Quartz reports:
Access to Amazon’s chips is currently limited to Amazon Web Services, with customers paying for cloud-based usage rather than owning any physical hardware. Selling to AWS and external customers alike, as standalone chipmakers do, would put annual revenue at around $50 billion, up from the $20 billion the company estimates for the year, Jassy said. The $20 billion figure spans three product lines: Trainium, the AI accelerator chip; Graviton, a general-purpose processor; and Nitro, a chip that helps run Amazon’s EC2 server instances. All three are growing at triple-digit rates year over year, Jassy claimed in his letter.

Jassy said demand for Trainium has outpaced supply at each generation. Trainium2 is essentially unavailable, with its entire allocated capacity spoken for. Trainium3 started reaching customers in early 2026, and reservations have filled nearly all available supply. Even Trainium4 — which is not expected to reach wide release for another year and a half — has substantial pre-orders committed. Jassy argued that a full-scale Trainium rollout could shave tens of billions off annual capital costs while meaningfully widening profit margin.

If Amazon runs out of stock

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Will they become Trainium Unobtainium?

Hmm…

By coofercat • Score: 3 Thread

Saying your pipeline for chips is full, when all you have is an internal market is pretty easy. You go around asking how many people would like, then produce that many, and poof! Your pipeline is 100% full.

Having a full pipeline with external customers is harder - you can’t ask them all before you start and those you do ask may change their order quantities before you start production. You don’t want to under-produce because you want to meet the demand, but you don’t want unsold inventory either. As a result, you either have to keep people waiting, or else you have to take a hit on over-production. Either results in a pipeline which is not 100% full.

That aside, anyone selling “AI chips” that isn’t nvidia strikes me as a good thing. There’s a slim chance that if a few start doing this, the price of ordinary computing might come down to a sensible level again.

OpenAI To Limit New Model Release On Cybersecurity Fears

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI is reportedly preparing a new cybersecurity product for a small group of partners, out of concern that a broader rollout could wreak havoc if it were released more widely. If that move sounds familiar, it’s because Anthropic took a similar limited-release approach with its Mythos model and Project Glasswing initiative. Axios reports:
OpenAI introduced its “Trusted Access for Cyber” pilot program in February after rolling out GPT-5.3-Codex, the company’s most cyber-capable reasoning model. Organizations in the invite-only program are given access to “even more cyber capable or permissive models to accelerate legitimate defensive work,” according to a blog post. At the time, OpenAI committed $10 million in API credits to participants. […]

Restricting the rollout of a new frontier model makes “more sense” if companies are concerned about models’ ability to write new exploits — rather than about their ability to find bugs in the first place, Stanislav Fort, CEO of security firm Aisle, told Axios. Staggering the release of new AI models looks a lot like how cybersecurity vendors currently handle the disclosure of security flaws in software, Lee added. “It’s the same debate we’ve had for decades around responsible vulnerability disclosure,” Lee said.

Hey what a coincidence…

By Junta • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Anthropic announces that they have a super awesome AI product that’s just too awesome for anyone for anyone to see.

And then immediately OpenAI has the exact same thing.

FOMO on “my technology is too scary to exist” is a fun twist.

I know, it’s not the first time, someone even linked an article where OpenAI said the same sort of thing about GPT-2 back in 2019…

Firesign Theatre Got It Right

By crunchy_one • Score: 3 Thread
As the Firesign Theatre said so many years ago, “A power so great, it can only be used for good, or evil.”

This isn’t a mirage

By LindleyF • Score: 3 Thread
Tech companies are running scared on this. Exploits are getting way too easy and there are few clear mitigations. Right now limiting the release might work, but what happens in a year when the open models have caught up?

Re:Us too

By Junta • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I do suspect that OpenAI will be the ‘Netscape’ of this bubble pop. Early mover that in many ways sparked something significant that got left behind by others that did it better.

I am so eager for a bubble pop to recalibrate expectations to properly leverage LLM as appropriate instead of the current madness. It will be an adjustment, but without the craze it won’t be nearly so obnoxious.

Re:Hey what a coincidence…

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Wait, doesn’t that go against OpenAI’s mission statement of OPEN ACCESS???

I’m pretty sure the “open” part now refers to opening your wallet.

Hacker Steals 10 Petabytes of Data From China’s Tianjin Supercomputer Center

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN:
A hacker has allegedly stolen a massive trove of sensitive data — including highly classified defense documents and missile schematics — from a state-run Chinese supercomputer in what could potentially constitute the largest known heist of data from China. The dataset, which allegedly contains more than 10 petabytes of sensitive information, is believed by experts to have been obtained from the National Supercomputing Center (NSCC) in Tianjin — a centralized hub that provides infrastructure services for more than 6,000 clients across China, including advanced science and defense agencies.

Cyber experts who have spoken to the alleged hacker and reviewed samples of the stolen data they posted online say they appeared to gain entry to the massive computer with comparative ease and were able to siphon out huge amounts of data over the course of multiple months without being detected. An account calling itself FlamingChina posted a sample of the alleged dataset on an anonymous Telegram channel on February 6, claiming it contained “research across various fields including aerospace engineering, military research, bioinformatics, fusion simulation and more.” The group alleges the information is linked to “top organizations” including the Aviation Industry Corporation of China, the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, and the National University of Defense Technology.

Cyber security experts who have reviewed the data say the group is offering a limited preview of the alleged dataset, for thousands of dollars, with full access priced at hundreds of thousands of dollars. Payment was requested in cryptocurrency. CNN cannot verify the origins of the alleged dataset and the claims made by FlamingChina, but spoke with multiple experts whose initial assessment of the leak indicated it was genuine. The alleged sample data appeared to include documents marked “secret” in Chinese, along with technical files, animated simulations and renderings of defense equipment including bombs and missiles.

So

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The hacker stole back stolen data then?

How the fuck?

By anoncoward69 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Do you not notice 10 PETABYTES of data transmitting out of your data center? This was either a slow transfer over a REALLY long time, or they pegged the network to download it all really quickly.

Re: How the fuck?

By sziring • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The only indication was a small blinking red light that was partially hidden by an empty coffee mug. It happened just like in the movies. You think they would have learned by now not to cover important blinking lights.

Re:Where would you even keep it?

By Scutter • Score: 5, Funny Thread

They bought a 10PB thumb drive from Aliexpress for $16.

Bandwidth And Storage

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

What “hacker” has that sort of bandwidth and storage available to them? We’re talking over $200,000 worth of bandwidth and storage. For the lulz and a chance to sell the data?

Sounds improbable.

EFF Is Leaving X

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
After nearly 20 years on the platform, The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) says it is leaving X. “This isn’t a decision we made lightly, but it might be overdue,” the digital rights group said. “The math hasn’t worked out for a while now.” From the report:
We posted to Twitter (now known as X) five to ten times a day in 2018. Those tweets garnered somewhere between 50 and 100 million impressions per month. By 2024, our 2,500 X posts generated around 2 million impressions each month. Last year, our 1,500 posts earned roughly 13 million impressions for the entire year. To put it bluntly, an X post today receives less than 3% of the views a single tweet delivered seven years ago. […]

When you go online, your rights should go with you. X is no longer where the fight is happening. The platform Musk took over was imperfect but impactful. What exists today is something else: diminished, and increasingly de minimis.

EFF takes on big fights, and we win. We do that by putting our time, skills, and our members’ support where they will effect the most change. Right now, that means Bluesky, Mastodon, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube, and eff.org. We hope you follow us there and keep supporting the work we do. Our work protecting digital rights is needed more than ever before, and we’re here to help you take back control.

Re: Late to the party

By ArmoredDragon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The cost thing has me wondering: What is the cost? Particularly when they mention LinkedIn, which goes out of its way to spam you anytime you do anything with it, (in my experience, they will provide anybody access to ALL PII you give to them, for a price) and whatever money they’re paying them almost certainly exceeds the $8 they didn’t have to spend on twitter. Or the fact that LinkedIn has a crap interface that they almost certainly have to spend more time fighting with than anything else.

Bluesky and mastodon should have basically the same cost, namely that of the time required to post there, with about 1/10th of the audience. So I’m calling bullshit on cost. Nor do I care why they’re leaving twitter even, but they’re literally trying to insult the intelligence of their audience here.

What’s more telling is who they’re staying with Fecebook…Seriously? The most privacy-hostile one of them all? The one who’s CEO publicly threw a tantrum after Google and Apple removed their ability to passively collect your location data 24/7? The one who is putting by far the most lobbying effort towards OS level age verification laws so they can blame somebody else for their own misconduct?

Fecebook and LinkedIn are, IMO, the only two actively deserving abandonment. Gotta have “who needs privacy?” (Facebook) and sleezball salesmen (LinkedIn) demographic the most, I guess? Whatever floats your boat. If you’re going to go out of your way to make sure everybody knows you’re leaving a social media platform to make some kind of statement, can’t you at least be consistent with your own statements and values? That’s kind of important if your mission is entirely political.

Re: Late to the party

By Narcocide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Reading between the lines here, the way I interpret this is that they’re basically doing this to send the message directly to X staff: “We think our actual drop in views is because you’ve altered your algorithm to de-prioritize our posts, but we have no direct proof of that so we’re just going to take our ball and go home and tell everyone else it’s because it’s just not worth it anymore.”

That may be pure speculation on my part, but the subtext seemed clear to me.

Re:Late to the party

By nmb3000 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

No problem, EFF hasn’t been cool for a while now. Remember what they did to RMS?

The EFF is probably the most important advocacy organization that educates and acts on behalf of normal people’s digital rights, freedoms, and privacy. The legal actions they take in support of these are meaningful. Now that the CFPB has been dismantled and the FCC and FTC had their teeth and spines removed, groups like EFF are the only thing we have in the US pushing back against millions of dollars of corporate lobbying money.

I’m not sure what you’re talking about regarding RMS. Aside from the open letter they published after he was re-elected to the FSF board, which is fine to disagree with (I do), I don’t think EFF did anything to him. Plenty of people pointed angry fingers at him in 2019 but AFAIK his resignation from the FSF was his own decision.

Re: meh

By toutankh • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And that’s also why the liberals leaving was stupid - they needed to be trying to convince the conservatives, not be retreating to an echo chamber.

I think a number of people left not to retreat to an echo chamber, but because every post, every hit on X means money for Elon Musk.

Re:meh

By alcmena • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

As someone who was in a toxic relationship with my ex, and had similar experiences with some family members, some people aren’t willing to be convinced and the effort spent trying can often be better used almost anywhere else.

Waymo Is Offering To Help Cities Fix Their Potholes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Waymo is launching a pilot with cities and Google’s Waze to share pothole data collected by its robotaxis, giving local transportation departments a new way to find and fix road damage more quickly. “We realized, hey, once we’re at scale, we can actually share this data with cities, which is something that they’ve asked for and something that we collect at scale,” said Arielle Fleisher, Waymo’s policy development and research manager. “And so we figured out a way to make that happen.” The Verge reports:
Waymo uses its perception hardware, including cameras and radar, as well as accelerometers and the vehicle’s physical feedback system, to log every pothole its vehicles encounter. These sensors detect physical changes to the road’s surface, such as tilt and movement when the vehicle encounters irregularities. Originally, Waymo knew it needed the ability to detect potholes so it could ensure that its vehicles slowed down to avoid damage or injury to the passenger. Later, the company realized this could be invaluable data for cities, too.

Under the new pilot program, that data will now be made available to cities’ departments of transportation through a free-to-use Waze for Cities platform, which provides access to real-time, user-generated traffic data that officials can then use to make important decisions — such as pothole repair. The platform also allows for Waze users to validate pothole locations through their own observations, decreasing the chances that city officials will be led astray by false positives.

Currently, many cities rely on a patchwork of non-emergency 311 reports and manual inspections to address their pothole problems. Waymo developed this pilot program after collecting years of feedback from city officials about the state of their highways and surface streets. The company is launching the new pilot in the San Francisco Bay Area, as well as Los Angeles, Phoenix, Austin, and Atlanta, where Waymo says it has already helped the city identify approximately 500 potholes. Fleisher said that Waymo would be open to expanding the project to other street maladies based on further feedback from officials. The company is eager to learn what other types of street condition or safety data might be valuable, she said.
“We want to be responsive to cities,” Fleisher said. “They are interested in safer streets and potholes are really a tough challenge for cities. So we really wanted to meet that need as part of our desire to be a good partner and to ultimately advance our goal for safer streets.”

problem

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The problem is having money and resources to fix potholes, not knowing where they are.

How will they determine how bad they are?

By usedtobestine • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Will Waymo cars start aiming for potholes so they can use the suspension travel to determine how bad the potholes are?

The way to get the city to fix potholes

By SubmergedInTech • Score: 5, Informative Thread

When you file a report, make sure to note that the pothole is big enough it could cause a bicyclist or motorcycle to lose control and become injured.

Then if someone *is* injured, there’s proof the city knew about the problem and chose not to fix it in a timely manner. That’s an automatic loss in a lawsuit.

Every pothole I’ve ever complained about this way has had a cone on it in a couple hours, and asphalt in a couple days.

If Waymo provides a free pothole database to the city, and the city chooses not to use it, then personal injury lawyers will have a field day. So I do think this will force a change in funding priorities.

Skilled Older Workers Turn To AI Training To Stay Afloat

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian:
[Five skilled workers aged 50 and older spoke] to the Guardian about how, after struggling to find work in their fields, they have turned to an emerging and growing category of work: using their expertise to train artificial intelligence models. Known as data annotation, the work involves labeling and evaluating the information used to train AI models like Open AI’s ChatGPT or Google’s Gemini. A doctor, for example, might review how an AI model answers medical questions to flag incorrect or unsafe responses and suggest better ones, helping the system learn how to generate more accurate and reliable responses. The ultimate goal of training is to level up AI models until they’re capable of doing a job as well as a human could — meaning they could someday replace some of these human workers.

The companies behind AI training, such as Mercor, GlobalLogic, TEKsystems, micro1 and Alignerr, operate large contractor networks staffed by people like Ciriello. Their clients include tech giants like OpenAI, Google and Meta, academic researchers and industries including healthcare and finance. For experienced professionals, AI training contracts can be a side hustle — or a temporary fallback following a layoff — where top experts can, in some cases, earn over $180 an hour. But that’s on the high end. For some older workers […], it represents another thing entirely: a last refuge in a brutal job market that is harder to stay in, or re-enter, the older they get. For many of them, whether or not they’re training their AI replacements in their professions is besides the point. They need the work now.

[…] “There’s just a lot of desperation out there,” Johnson said. As opportunities narrow, many turn to what Joanna Lahey, a professor at Texas A&M University who studies age discrimination and labor outcomes, calls “bridge jobs” — lower-paying, less demanding roles that help workers stay financially afloat as they approach retirement. Historically, that meant taking temp assignments, retail and fast-food work and gig roles like Uber and food delivery. Now, for skilled workers — engineers, lawyers, nurses or designers, for example — using their expertise for AI data training is becoming the new bridge job. "[AI] training work may be better in some ways than those earlier alternatives,” Lahey told the Guardian.

AI training can offer flexibility, quick income and intellectual engagement. But it’s often a clear step down. Professionals in fields such as software development, medicine or finance typically earn six-figure salaries that come with benefits and paid leave, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. According to online job postings, AI training gigs start at $20 an hour, with pay increasing to between $30 and $40 an hour. In some cases, AI trainers with coveted subject matter expertise can earn over $100 an hour. AI training is contract-based, though, meaning the pay and hours are unstable, and it often doesn’t come with benefits.

Fuck the Nazi Guardian

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
Fuck the Nazi Guardian.

Use it to know what anti-semitic attacks are being planned in the UK, but not for factual, unbiased reporting. They gave up on that long ago.

Re:Fuck the Nazi Guardian

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Hi! American here. You appear to have committed a small typographical error. In actuality, the organizations using violence to enact the cultural destruction of the Western world are in fact fully governmental, and they are using immigrants as scapegoats and victims to satisfy the atavistic bloodlust of their pig-ignorant supporters. Don’t fret, easy mistake to make!

How to vote for your interests

By oumuamua • Score: 3 Thread
1) Nov 2026 vote out the clowns who want to actually take away your right to vote, are causing inflation, ruining America’s reputation, … long list
2) Get rid of the 2 party system. Support any and all measures to do ranked choice voting which gets rid of ‘vote so the other guy doesn’t win’.
3) Nov 2028 vote in completely in your own interest without having to ‘vote so the other guy doesn’t win’