Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Musk Predicts SpaceX Will Launch More AI Compute Per Year Than the Cumulative Total on Earth
  2. Automattic and the Internet Archive Team Up To Fight Link Rot
  3. Anthropic Launches Claude Opus 4.6 as Its AI Tools Rattle Software Markets
  4. Western Digital Plots a Path To 140 TB Hard Drives Using Vertical Lasers and 14-Platter Designs
  5. Amazon Plans To Use AI To Speed Up TV and Film Production
  6. Spotify Plans To Sell Physical Books
  7. FBI Couldn’t Get Into Reporter’s iPhone Because It Had Lockdown Mode Enabled
  8. Kalshi Claims ‘Extortion,’ Then Recants in Feud Over User Losses
  9. China Has Seized Sony’s Television Halo
  10. Munich Makes Digital Sovereignty Measurable With Its Own Score
  11. Valve’s Steam Machine Has Been Delayed, and the RAM Crisis Will Impact Pricing
  12. BMW Commits To Subscriptions Even After Heated Seat Debacle
  13. Microsoft Adds Sysmon To Windows
  14. Russian Spy Satellites Have Intercepted EU Communications Satellites
  15. ‘Everyone is Stealing TV’

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Musk Predicts SpaceX Will Launch More AI Compute Per Year Than the Cumulative Total on Earth

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Elon Musk told podcast host Dwarkesh Patel and Stripe co-founder John Collison that space will become the most economically compelling location for AI data centers in less than 36 months, a prediction rooted not in some exotic technical breakthrough but in the basic math of electricity supply: chip output is growing exponentially, and electrical output outside China is essentially flat.

Solar panels in orbit generate roughly five times the power they do on the ground because there is no day-night cycle, no cloud cover, no atmospheric loss, and no atmosphere-related energy reduction. The system economics are even more favorable because space-based operations eliminate the need for batteries entirely, making the effective cost roughly 10 times cheaper than terrestrial solar, Musk said. The terrestrial bottleneck is already real.

Musk said powering 330,000 Nvidia GB300 chips — once you account for networking hardware, storage, peak cooling on the hottest day of the year, and reserve margin for generator servicing — requires roughly a gigawatt at the generation level. Gas turbines are sold out through 2030, and the limiting factor is the casting of turbine vanes and blades, a process handled by just three companies worldwide.

Five years from now, Musk predicted, SpaceX will launch and operate more AI compute annually than the cumulative total on Earth, expecting at least a few hundred gigawatts per year in space. Patel estimated that 100 gigawatts alone would require on the order of 10,000 Starship launches per year, a figure Musk affirmed. SpaceX is gearing up for 10,000 launches a year, Musk said, and possibly 20,000 to 30,000.

100 Gigawatts. In a vacuum.

By spazmonkey • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Neat trick. Now what are you going to get rid of all that heat that generates?
You know. IN A VACUUM.
Yes, I know there are IR radiators. With a dissipation of around 200w per square meter
Now do the math for 100GW

Re:Cooling

By gweihir • Score: 5, Informative Thread

As will be radiation, orbital debris, etc., etc.

The orbit is about the most dumb location for a datacenter at this time. Maybe in 50 years, but the tech is not there. Non-engineers like Musk do not understand even the basics of the severe problems they are facing. And on the economics side it is also a total fail, because getting weight up there is still very expensive even with SpaceX.

Re:Cooling

By fleeped • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Space is cold, duh. Cold+heat = room temperature. Math checks out. Can also use the GPU fans as thrusters. Excuse me, need to go to the patent office.

Re: Liar

By Frank Burly • Score: 5, Funny Thread

You don’t become a successful business owner this many times over by lying to people.

Greetings! The good news is that your time machine has successfully transported you to the year 2026. The bad news is that it’s 2026.

Re:Not all orbits

By Rei • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The unspoken issue here is that getting rid of heat (on Earth, all those people complaining about water use of datacentres) is far harder in space. The panels at least radiate *their* heat away from their large rear surface area, but the datacentre itself has to have large amounts of fluid cycling out and back to roughly comparably large radiators.

It doesn’t make space datacentres “undoable”, by any stretch, but omitting mentioning it and talking only about the power advantages is really dishonest.

Automattic and the Internet Archive Team Up To Fight Link Rot

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Automattic and the Internet Archive have released a free, open-source WordPress plugin that automatically detects broken outbound links on a site and redirects visitors to archived Wayback Machine copies instead of serving them a 404 error.

The Internet Archive Wayback Machine Link Fixer, which launched last fall and is available on WordPress.org, runs in the background scanning posts for dead links, checking for existing archived versions, and requesting new snapshots when none exist. It also archives a site’s own posts whenever they are updated. If the original link comes back online, the plugin stops redirecting.

Pew Research has found that 38% of the web has disappeared over the past decade, and WordPress powers more than 40% of websites online.

Anthropic Launches Claude Opus 4.6 as Its AI Tools Rattle Software Markets

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic on Thursday released Claude Opus 4.6, its most capable model yet, at a moment when the company’s AI tools have already spooked markets over fears that they are disrupting traditional software development and other sectors.

The new model improves on Opus 4.5’s coding abilities, the company said — it plans more carefully, sustains longer agentic tasks, handles larger codebases more reliably, and catches its own mistakes through better debugging. It is also the first Opus-class model to feature a 1M token context window, currently in beta.

On GDPval-AA, an independent benchmark measuring performance on knowledge-work tasks in finance, legal and other domains, Opus 4.6 outperformed OpenAI’s GPT-5.2 by roughly 144 Elo points. Anthropic also introduced agent teams in Claude Code, allowing multiple agents to work in parallel on tasks like codebase reviews. Pricing remains at $5/$25 per million input/output tokens.

I wish journalists still existed…

By Kokuyo • Score: 3 Thread

Seriously.

144 elo points better than ChatGPT? Okay. So how many does ChatGPT get? 112? 1345? 13634? 98123?

Giving this number would elevate the summary from useless to useful.

Re:I wish journalists still existed…

By Kokuyo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

For anyone interestet, GPT5.2 scored 1462, so we’re talking a 10 percent increase in score.

Western Digital Plots a Path To 140 TB Hard Drives Using Vertical Lasers and 14-Platter Designs

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Western Digital this week laid out a roadmap that stretches its 3.5-inch hard drive platform to 14 platters and pairs it with a new vertical-emitting laser for heat-assisted magnetic recording, a combination the company says will push individual drive capacities beyond 140 TB in the 2030s.

The vertical laser, developed over six years and already working in WD’s labs, emits light straight down onto the disk rather than from the edge, delivering more thermal energy while occupying less vertical space — enabling areal densities up to 10 TB per platter, up from today’s 4 TB, and room for additional platters in the same enclosure. WD’s first commercial HAMR drives arrive in late 2026 at 40-44 TB on an 11-platter design, ramping into volume production in 2027. A 12-platter platform follows in 2028 at 60 TB, and WD expects to hit 100 TB by around 2030.

I feel like that’s too big

By suutar • Score: 5, Funny Thread

that’s going to take _forever_ to scan for corruption

Laser Lifetime

By weirdow • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
One has to wonder how long the lasers will last, and when they finally fail, will the drive still be usable as a Read Only drive .

We need a new form factor for HDDs…

By ctilsie242 • Score: 3 Thread

One thing I’m wondering is about changing form factors. For SSDs, the current NVMe form factors and such make sense. However, HDDs need a new form factor. 2.5” HDDs are pretty much abandoned with the last space increase to 6 TB happening a year or two ago. 3.5” HDDs really need more height to allow for more disks to be stacked or more room to place platters.

Maybe we need to bring back the 5.25” full height form factor? It obviously would not work with the 1-3 rack unit systems, so the drives would have to go in an external rack and be hooked up via SAS, FC, or some other protocol. Or maybe start clean completely and have a format that is future-resistant and can grow in whatever dimensions are needed.

Re:I feel like that’s too big

By Junta • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Well let’s see…

Today they offer 32TB drives on SATA 6gpbs… If that is ‘acceptable’ then reading the entire drive takes at least 18 hours or so in theory. If same interface, then you’d be limited to 78 hours…

But wait, there’s been talk about spinning platters being upgraded to NVME interfaces. Largely because “why accommodate spinning drives with a separate interface”, but if this comes in, and could credibly in that timeframe have NVMe with PCIe 6, then the total drive read time could be reduced to about 90 minutes, in theory.

So in theory, such a drive with a credible storage interface could push this in a more reasonable time period. Historically spinning platters seek performance made the nvme overkill, but streaming performance with that many platters and that density may remedy the ‘drive too big’ problem. Of course, in the *consumer* market this means that systems would have to start accommodating that sort of connectivity… Of course, in the timeframe perhaps the drives would just use USB to connect, and could credibly connect at 120Gbps, which would mean about 180 minutes of time to read the full time…

In short, it’s time to move to PCIe connectivity to tame these capacities…

How Thick?

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

How thick is that disk with 14 platters?

Amazon Plans To Use AI To Speed Up TV and Film Production

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon plans to use AI to speed up the process for making movies and TV shows even as Hollywood fears that AI will cut jobs and permanently reshape the industry. From a report:
At the Amazon MGM Studio, veteran entertainment executive Albert Cheng is leading a team charged with developing new AI tools that he said will cut costs and streamline the creative process. Amazon plans to launch a closed beta program in March, inviting industry partners to test its AI tools. The company expects to have results to share by May. […] Amazon is leaning on its cloud computing division, Amazon Web Services, for help and plans to work with multiple large language model providers to give creators a wider array of options for pre- and post-production filmmaking.

Optimizing the wrong end

By abulafia • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
A fundamental law of the entertainment industry is that entertainment takes time to consume. It isn’t like food or cars, where people buy to waste.

So no matter how quickly you can make a movie, it still takes an 80-100 or whatever minutes to watch it.

So they need more consumers. This is where agents come in.

They just need to convince people to want to own a series of robots to be entertained for them. I’m sure they could come up with a “vibe-viewing” UI to managing your little virtual popcorn-eaters - maybe Nintendo could help, they’re good at that sort of thing.

And then kids could humiliate each other over how much media their peers are wasting without experiencing.

That’s the smell of innovation.

Re:Translation Time

By sabbede • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Have you not watched Fallout? Amazon has some solid originals. Bezos may be a greedy dickhead, but his company is making some worthy stuff.

Re: cut costs and remove the creative process

By Fnord666 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
“AI gives them slop. Ideas that are unoriginal and derivative”. Based on what I’ve seen on Amazon the past couple of years, no one would know the difference.

Re:The enshittification is proceeding apace

By serviscope_minor • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

On the plus side, TV has hit rock bottom decades ago,

No it didn’t. The last 15 years have arguably been the high point of TV.

Decades ago, let’s say 30 years to 20 years. Well, 30 years ago was about the first ever show with an entire multi-season story arc plotted out in advance (Babylon 5). There were of course many missteps because literally no one had done it before and the studio had no fucking idea what to do with it. It probably took another 10 years before people finally figured out how to execute such a thing. And now they’ve got good at properly executing single and multi-season arcs.

For example.

That’s not to say there aren’t some decent shows from the 90s and 2000s. There were a lot of shows after all, but quite a lot of them feel somewhat dated. Slow moving, clunky plots, weird retconning and plot holes due to lack of proper planning.

Yawn

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Throughout all of history advances in technology have been primarily billed at making it easier to make movies. From the move to miniature sets, digital cameras, different technologies for separating characters from backgrounds, e.g. green screening existed to speed up rotoscoping…

AI is a tool. Of course it was going to be used in Hollywood. They’ve attempted to use literally everything ever developed to help speed up film making.

Spotify Plans To Sell Physical Books

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Spotify is planning to let premium subscribers in the U.S. and U.K. buy hardcovers and paperbacks directly through its app starting this spring, partnering with Bookshop.org to handle pricing, inventory and fulfillment.

The Swedish streaming company, which entered the audiobook market in 2022, will also introduce a feature called Page Match that lets users scan a page from a physical book or e-reader and jump to the exact spot in the audiobook edition. Spotify will earn an undisclosed affiliate fee on each purchase.

FBI Couldn’t Get Into Reporter’s iPhone Because It Had Lockdown Mode Enabled

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The FBI has been unable to access a Washington Post reporter’s seized iPhone because it was in Lockdown Mode, a sometimes overlooked feature that makes iPhones broadly more secure, according to recently filed court records. 404Media:
The court record shows what devices and data the FBI was able to ultimately access, and which devices it could not, after raiding the home of the reporter, Hannah Natanson, in January as part of an investigation into leaks of classified information. It also provides rare insight into the apparent effectiveness of Lockdown Mode, or at least how effective it might be before the FBI may try other techniques to access the device.

“Because the iPhone was in Lockdown mode, CART could not extract that device,” the court record reads, referring to the FBI’s Computer Analysis Response Team, a unit focused on performing forensic analyses of seized devices. The document is written by the government, and is opposing the return of Natanson’s devices.

The FBI raided Natanson’s home as part of its investigation into government contractor Aurelio Perez-Lugones, who is charged with, among other things, retention of national defense information. The government believes Perez-Lugones was a source of Natanson’s, and provided her with various pieces of classified information. While executing a search warrant for his mobile phone, investigators reviewed Signal messages between Pere-Lugones and the reporter, the Department of Justice previously said.

Re:totalitarians go after reporters

By sinij • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It is way early to try to memoryhole Obama’s administration going after journalists the same way. This is one of the rare cases where this is undeniably both parties problem. This is why Constitution exists.

Re:Bad Apple Ad

By mccalli • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Because it would be unusable. Lockdown mode is pretty severe, it’s not something you want to deal with day to day.

Initiate self-destruct sequence.

By codebase7 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Even if you did get the thing back, no sane person who actually cares about OpSec would use it. It’s compromised. Even if they couldn’t access the data, there’s no telling what else they did succeed in doing to it. Hell, attempting to use it might allow them to finally access that data, complete with automatic transmission to their analysts.

Lockdown mode is better than nothing, but in reality the best option would be automatic, instant, and silent destruction of any data that the adversary might want to get their hands on. After all, adversaries rarely allow you to get the device back anyway. (And there’s typically a ploy at work for them if they do.)

Re: Initiate self-destruct sequence.

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s tough to initiate that when you’re not certain when a device will fall into the wrong hangs. A lock down plus time out for self erase might be a reasonable compromise.

My old friend used to put a hundreds of fake URLs that he monitored as a canary or trip wire (I forgot what he called it). The longish path to a fake file was unlikely to be found accidentally, but if someone access his device and attempted to access the links that would inadvertently alert him. This can be helpful for detecting a remote attack, or knowing when an agency successfully unlocked a device. With the intention that he’d get a lawyer to go after any improper procedure to reach an acquittal

Re:Bad Apple Ad

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Informative Thread

From the link:

How Lockdown Mode protects your device

When Lockdown Mode is enabled, some apps and features will function differently, including:

Messages: most message attachment types are blocked, other than certain images, video and audio. Some features, such as links and link previews, will be unavailable.

Web browsing: certain complex web technologies are blocked, which may cause some websites to load more slowly or not operate correctly. In addition, web fonts may not be displayed, and images may be replaced with a missing image icon.

FaceTime: incoming FaceTime calls will be blocked unless you have previously called that person or contact within the past 30 days. Features such as SharePlay and Live Photos are unavailable.

Apple services: incoming invitations for Apple services, such as invitations to manage a home in the Home app, will be blocked unless you have previously invited that person. Focus and any related status will not work as expected. Game Center is also disabled.

Photos: when you share photos, location information will be excluded. Shared albums are removed from the Photos app, and new Shared Album invitations are blocked. You can still view these shared albums on other devices that haven’t enabled Lockdown Mode.

Device connections: to connect your iPhone or iPad to an accessory or another computer, the device needs to be unlocked. To connect your Mac laptop with Apple silicon to an accessory, your Mac needs to be unlocked and you need to provide explicit approval.

Wireless connectivity: your device won’t automatically join non-secure Wi-Fi networks and will disconnect from a non-secure Wi-Fi network when you turn on Lockdown Mode. 2G and 3G mobile support is turned off for iPhone and iPad.

Configuration profiles: configuration profiles can’t be installed, and the device can’t be enrolled in Mobile Device Management or device supervision while in Lockdown Mode.

Phone calls and plain text messages continue to work while Lockdown Mode is turned on, although incoming calls won’t ring on a paired Apple Watch. Emergency features, such as SOS emergency calls, will not be affected.

Kalshi Claims ‘Extortion,’ Then Recants in Feud Over User Losses

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Kalshi, the largest U.S. prediction market, accused a small data startup called Juice Reel of “extortion” after a stock analyst used the company’s transaction-level data to argue that prediction market users lose money faster than gamblers on traditional betting apps — then walked the allegation back hours later.

The equity research analyst Jordan Bender at Citizens found that the bottom quarter of prediction market users lost about 28 cents of every dollar wagered in their first three months, compared to roughly 11 cents per dollar on sites like FanDuel and DraftKings. Kalshi’s head of communications told Bloomberg the report was “flat-out wrong” and called the data an extortion attempt. Juice Reel CEO Ricky Gold said Kalshi had actually pressured him to tell Bloomberg the data was inaccurate. Kalshi later issued an updated statement saying it continued to dispute the findings but “after further review, we don’t believe the intention was extortion.” The company did not provide any data to counter the analysis.

The House always wins!

By methano • Score: 3 Thread
I think the lesson here is that the House wins and everybody else loses when there’s gambling involved.

Water is wet?

By chas.williams • Score: 3 Thread
The bettors have to lose money on average. Otherwise, Kalshi couldn’t stay in business to pay the winners. How much they lose is a matter of debate. No one should go around arguing, “I only play FanDuel because I don’t lose as much money.”

Let’s call each card suit by its proper name.

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 3 Thread

“Kalshi, the largest U.S. casino…”

FTFY.

China Has Seized Sony’s Television Halo

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Sony announced last month that it plans to pass control of its home entertainment division — including the two-decade-old Bravia television brand — to Chinese electronics group TCL through a joint venture in which TCL would hold a 51% stake. The Japanese company was long ago overtaken in sales by South Korea’s Samsung and LG and now holds just 2% of the global television market. Sony stopped making its own LCD screens in 2011.

Chinese companies supplied 71% of television panels made in Asia last year, according to TCL, and less than 10% are now produced in Japan and Korea. TCL is close to overtaking Samsung as the world’s largest television maker. Sony retains valuable intellectual property in image rendering, and the Bravia brand still carries consumer recognition, but its OLED screens are already supplied by Samsung and LG. The company has been shifting toward premium cameras, professional audio, and its entertainment businesses in film, music, and games — areas where intellectual property is less exposed to Chinese manufacturing scale.

Hyperbole

By ledow • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

“Seized”

Hyperbole much?

Can’t seize what was willingly given away.

By TigerPlish • Score: 3 Thread

Can’t seize what was willingly given away.

Sony chose to give up the market to others.

So did Panasonic

Sad to see, but as they say, “all good things..”

Re:Hyperbole

By Junta • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Well, the ThinkPad line has pretty much sustained the quality from IBM days, yes the non-Thinkpad stuff is frequently junk, but then again before IBM sold it off the desktops were not-so-affectionately nicknamed Craptiva, so IBM was no stranger to slumming it to try to get share, but Lenovo was more aggressive about it. So yes, the Lenovo at the local best buy is probably crap, but the ThinkPad line is pretty much intact. At least insofar as any of the brands are intact, keyboards across the board have opted to be a little worse for the sake of looking more appealing and accommodating thinner form factors.

Similarly, the biggest security controversy were on the non-Thinkpad lines. The ‘Superfish’ fiasco that every keeps citing was actually a US company using an Israeli SSL hijacker, so Lenovo screwed up by bundling the wrong crapware, which is terrible, but far from unique given the penchant for vendors to take all sorts of dubious comers. The good news being after Superfish, I think the whole industry was a bit more careful about the crapware they bundle.

Re:Hyperbole

By codebase7 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
And why was that an effective punishment? Because the US offloaded it’s entire manufacturing base to China so that a bunch of greedy assholes in the US could make a buck off of it.

So yes, the average American has a reason to hate China. China literally took their jobs, and they’ve never recovered from it. Worse, the “global market” means that any attempt to revive the dead industry in the US will always be out gunned. The average American has been forced to pay the thieves for everything ever since, and anyone who’s tried to make a new product in the US has had to deal with never-ending hordes of Chinese knock-offs appearing on Amazon the second they get an initial manufacturing quote.

Globalization was a mistake, and the reason China made that threat isn’t because of the asshole in the White House throwing a temper-tantrum. That was just a good PR excuse. The real reason is because China now has a similar problem to the US circa 1980. Their standard of living has gotten too high for the global owner class’ tastes and they are at risk of losing their manufacturing base to other countries. (Malaysia, etc.) So much to the point that the CCP is now trying to ban high level workers from leaving the country to train their replacements. (Because China knows how this works out, having been a previous beneficiary.) China doesn’t want to speedrun the US’s downfall, and the CCP has no intention of being replaced. They might make a good show of being “cooperative” in the short term, but long term, they’ll be forced to compete against cheaper countries, will suffer industry losses and currency inflation, and will gradually follow the same path as the US. Becoming “hostile” towards other countries as they work towards insulating themselves from the global market’s whims.

Meanwhile the rest of the world is on-board with some of what China is doing, especially the stuff that cuts the US out of things like international banking

As if China won’t follow the same playbook? They’ve already done the rare earths bit, and as you’ve alluded to, want to axe the US out completely. What makes you think they’ll stop at just the US? It’s a powerful weapon. There will be immense internal pressure to use it with or without permission from the rest of the world. Europe’s preferences be dammed. Note: The same would apply to the Europeans, or anyone else, given that power. It allows collapsing a country you don’t like without firing a single bullet. No country is immune to that temptation.

If there is a cold war, it’s because the US seem to want one.

The average American in fact does not want a war, but that matters very little given the massively corrupt government that they have. Their government represents them in name only. (Unless they just so happen to be the small, loud, fraction of them that actively supports pedos.)

Conservatives there need a Big Bad to justify what they are doing.

Conservatives need nothing. They’ve had something to legitimately rail against ever since the owner class shipped all of their jobs to China. The problem is the owner class, who’s convinced them that immigrants, LBTQ, etc. are responsible for it, instead of the owner class wanting to take more of their money. The Conservative’s politicians, need no justification either. Might makes right is their justification. As they’ve already demonstrated with C-COT, killing Americans for protesting, terrorizing progressive cities, withholding congressionally mandated funds, blatantly defying court orders, threatening nationalization of elections, etc.

Munich Makes Digital Sovereignty Measurable With Its Own Score

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right writes:
The city of Munich has developed its own measurement instrument to assess the digital sovereignty of its IT infrastructure. The so-called Digital Sovereignty Score (SDS) visually resembles the Nutri-Score and identifies IT systems based on their independence from individual providers and ‘foreign’ legal spheres. The Technical University of Munich was involved in the development.

In September and October 2025, the IT Department already conducted a first comprehensive test. Out of a total of 2780 municipal application services, 194 particularly critical ones were selected and evaluated based on five categories. The analysis already showed a high degree of digital sovereignty: 66% of the 194 evaluated services reached the highest levels (SDS 1 and 2), only 5% reached the critical level 4, and 21% reached the most critical level 5. The SDS evaluates not only technical dependencies but also legal and organizational risks.

Re:This is f**d up

By korgitser • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Everything is inherently global to some extent. But global systems only work if every actor has good will. Everyone should have learned that lesson by now.

And even within a system of good will, there’s still basic facts about sovreignity, like if a country cannot feed itself, it’s not independent. When it needs food the most is also when everyone else needs it most, and it will therefore starve. In this real world of ours that sadly has a severe lack of good will, you are going to bend over to someone you really don’t want to be bending over to, just to stay alive.

Now as to data and such. With the US showing it’s true colours more and more in the recent times, the threat becomes real that if your infrastructure is based on US tech, hosted by US companies, and maybe even hosted within US borders, they might just take all of that hostage, and you will be bending over again.

Compliance on the other hand is not so much an issue of affordability, but of giving a fuck. If you are big enough to serve government contracts, you can afford to comply to their requirements. Even more, the government itself will pay for the compliance, because in the end it’s just part of the pricing calculation. But let’s compare Google, who cannot be arsed to comply with the EU requirement to keep all EU data within EU borders, and Microsoft, who can be arsed. Guess which company has all the business.

Interoperability, on the other hand, is not really the name of the game of the status quo, is it. Every vendor is working to get you locked in to their platform. It takes policy and budget and will to steer clear of that. Funny thing is, interoperability is cheaper, because you can just use off-the-shelf components to build your stack. But building a vendor lock-in platform takes investment, and that’s a mega-platform game.

Lastly, there’s always the magic word of efficiency at play, isn’t it. Well here’s the problem with efficiency. Efficiency is brittle. If you optimize for efficiency, there’s no room for a safety margin. The 2008 economic crisis was caused by efficiency. Nvidia melting connectors are caused by efficiency. Covid supply chain issues were caused by efficiency. It’s just a catchall word to argue against anything that might be important, but what it really argues for is that spending as little money as possible is the most important thing. And it isn’t. Money is just something you use to achieve what is actually important. If you spent the money, however little, but didn’t get what you need, the money was wasted. If you want to make sure you will not be bending over when the shit hits the fan, you will need to pay your way.

Re:This is f**d up

By Bert64 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Global isn’t the problem, it’s central control by a foreign entity which is the issue.

Linux is global, and even tho Linus lives in the US and is thus beholden to US law any changes forced by the government would be noticeable, and foreign users could create a fork that’s free of further US influence.
The same can’t be said of commercial operations - even when a US based company has an EU division, they are ultimately answerable to the US based bosses and thus by extension to the US government. Sure they may store data on servers physically in the EU, but that doesn’t do much good if the people managing those servers answer to foreigners.

Well done, now start the race

By aRTeeNLCH • Score: 3 Thread
Good job! Now let’s hope others follow suit.

Reading some of the other comments, it sounds like the trolls are out or people don’t get the idea.

Essentially, in how far can you take your ball and go home, or rather, go play with different people. For office 365 you have exactly one source, but for office, there are now many options. And so on and so forth. Having your data locked into a specific solution without an easy way out sets you up for abuse, see Broadcom. There’s a clear need for exit strategies, but most haven’t realised this.

Valve’s Steam Machine Has Been Delayed, and the RAM Crisis Will Impact Pricing

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Valve has pushed back the launch of its Steam Machine, Steam Frame and Steam Controller hardware from its original Q1 2026 window to a vaguer “first half of the year” target, blaming the ongoing memory and storage shortage that has been squeezing the tech industry.

The company said in a post today that rising component prices and limited availability forced it to revisit both its shipping schedule and pricing plans. Valve had previously indicated the Steam Machine would be priced at the entry level of the PC space.

Boooooo

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Bad AI!

Manufactured crises

By bleedingobvious • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Where LLM actors are using investor money to suck up everything in order to keep it out of the hands of the competition.

Cannot wait for this bubble to pop and we get to see those responsible hanging from street lights. (Hahahahahaha - not)

Let’s hope China saves us

By diffract • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Rumor has it some Chinese chip manufacturers are developing DRAM chips, which should be cheaper.

AI is economically disastrous

By Pinky’s Brain • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

AI doesn’t destroy jobs because of replacement, but simply because of malinvestment.

The amount of companies getting destroyed here for a bit of boom and bust in datacentre construction is ridiculous.

Re:Let’s hope China saves us

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Rumor has it some Chinese chip manufacturers are developing DRAM chips, which should be cheaper.

Do they come with optional bit-flipping technology? But QA jokes asside China has had DRAM manufacturing capability. CXMT started production of DRAM in 2018. But it takes many years to get a new facility up and running for DRAM production. If there are any facilities coming online right now they have nothing to do with AI or the current shortage.

BMW Commits To Subscriptions Even After Heated Seat Debacle

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
BMW may have retreated from its controversial plan to charge monthly fees for heated seats, but the German automaker is pressing ahead with subscription-based vehicle features through its ConnectedDrive platform.

A company spokesperson told The Drive that BMW “remains fully committed” to ConnectedDrive as part of its global aftersales strategy. Features requiring data connectivity will likely carry recurring fees.

When subscriptions are good ideas.

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If it costs your companies money to provide the service every month, then it is a good idea to charge a subscription for the service.

If it is costs you nothing to provide the ‘service’, then you are a scum sucking thieving bastard that is trying to rip off your customers.

Example1: To print a magazine every month and deliver it, costs you money: SUBSCRIPTION.

Example 2: To let them use something they already bought: NO SUBSCRIPTION.

Re:Not only BMW

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And, right there, you find the real reason so many manufacturers are no longer offering CarPlay and Android Auto.

If you use either of those third-party services, you’ll find you don’t have much need for the manufacturer-provided network connection, GPS maps, road condition reports, local speed limit info, etc. etc.

Re: New Subscription - only $149.99/month

By macson_g • Score: 5, Funny Thread
BMW has turn signals…?

Re: New Subscription - only $149.99/month

By wgoodman • Score: 5, Funny Thread

They’re ornamental

Re:Explain

By MBGMorden • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The option itself was what set people off.

Even if there is an offer to heated seats to be a purchase, having the OPTION to pay monthly made a truth obvious to the public that anyone can understand: You can’t download seat heating. That’s hardware that’s either there or its not, and if you’re charging monthly for it then its already part of the car that I’ve paid for and this car is already perfectly capable of performing the function - you just want more money to enable it.

People would have been pissed to find out that the heating hardware was there and just “turned on” even if it was a purchase option rather than a subscription, but most people would never think about it or notice. The subscription option though made that fact very, very obvious.

Microsoft Adds Sysmon To Windows

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft has finally delivered on its promise to integrate Sysmon — the long-standing system monitoring tool from its Sysinternals suite — directly into Windows, a move that should make life considerably easier for enterprise administrators who have struggled with deploying and managing the utility across thousands of endpoints.

The functionality landed this week in Windows Insider builds 26300.7733 (Dev channel) and 26220.7752 (Beta channel). Sysmon allows administrators to capture system events through custom configuration files, filter for specific activity, and pipe the data into standard Windows event logs for pickup by security tools and SIEM pipelines. Mark Russinovich, Microsoft technical fellow and Winternals co-founder, has previously noted the lack of official customer support for Sysmon in production environments — a gap this integration addresses. The feature ships disabled by default and requires PowerShell to enable. Microsoft notes that any existing Sysmon installation must be uninstalled before activating the built-in version.

What?

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Funny Thread

They haven’t renamed it CoPilot Sysmon yet?

Re:More Likely for MS to Take Control of Your Mach

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Let’s face it: Microsoft can no longer be trusted with your data. On a fresh Windows installation, just how long does it take to attempt to de-clap it?

I’m far from Microsoft’s biggest fan, but when they do one ever so slightly positive thing that people have actually wanted, we don’t have to immediately assume the worst. Give it a week and we’ll have a report about the worst, but the announcement gives us a brief respite from, “When are they going to do something we’ve actually asked for?” We can celebrate that vanishingly small victory for a few seconds before we find out the nefarious part.

Right?

Riiiiiiiight?

Russian Spy Satellites Have Intercepted EU Communications Satellites

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
European security officials believe two Russian space vehicles have intercepted the communications of at least a dozen key satellites over the continent. From a report:
Officials believe that the likely interceptions, which have not previously been reported, risk not only compromising sensitive information transmitted by the satellites but could also allow Moscow to manipulate their trajectories or even crash them.

Russian space vehicles have shadowed European satellites more intensively over the past three years, at a time of high tension between the Kremlin and the West following Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. For several years, military and civilian space authorities in the West have been tracking the activities of Luch-1 and Luch-2 — two Russian objects that have carried out repeated suspicious maneuvers in orbit.

Both vehicles have made risky close approaches to some of Europe’s most important geostationary satellites, which operate high above the Earth and service the continent, including the UK, as well as large parts of Africa and the Middle East. According to orbital data and ground-based telescopic observations, they have lingered nearby for weeks at a time, particularly over the past three years. Since its launch in 2023, Luch-2 has approached 17 European satellites.

Re:Eh

By unixisc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Not just that, given the state of the Russian army and how it’s struggling to just hold on to Ukraine, there is nothing they could do even w/ all the information they that NATO had to offer. They’ve hollowed out much of their country except for Moscow and St Petersburg. This is worse than it was during Operation Barbarossa. At least that time, the Soviet Union was invaded. Today, this is a war Russia started, and one they can stop anytime, if saving Putin’s face is not on the agenda

If 1990 exposed Saudi Arabia as a paper tiger during Operation Desert Shield, 2022 did the same for Russia in Ukraine. Tomorrow, if the PLA wanted, they could just walk into Primorsky and Krasnoyarsk and annex them. Heck, they could easily overrun and conquer all of Russia from the Urals to the Bering Sea

Re:Eh

By unixisc • Score: 5, Informative Thread

No, I meant that after the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, it was expected that Saudi Arabia would be next. Prior to that, it was thought that the Saudis were a regional military heavyweight. But instead, it was the US that had to scramble to put military assets in place in Saudi Arabia, so that Saddam didn’t go on to invade them. That is what exposed Riyadh as a paper tiger - a country that theoretically looked formidable, but in reality, couldn’t even have defended themselves if their lives depended on it

We’ve actually seen it more recently as well. In 2020, when Saudi oil installations and even Riyadh airport were being hit by Houthi missiles, there was no retaliation by Riyadh. One thing I’ve heard was that after spending billions on US military toys, the Saudis are extremely protective of those assets, and would rather lose personnel than those things they paid good money for. When they can’t even intimidate the Houthis, the less said about their military capabilities, the better

Re:Eh

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Russians don’t currently have the capability to transport humans to orbit and back.

Re:click bait title?

By Richard_at_work • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Yes its a clickbait title.

The US also does this - check out the Orion/Mentor satellites, or the JUMPSEAT satellites. Public astronomers have tracked satellites launched by US launchers moving into position behind other countries communications satellites, where they can capture the overspill of the transmissions sent to those satellites - they have huge dishes for just that purpose.

But oh noes, Russia or China is doing it, must call them out on it!!

Re:No encryption in 2019?!

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Plausible; but in that case, you would do what you could to avoid using that platform for “sensitive” data, right? Mundane stuff, sure; no big deal. Confidential stuff: no.

For communication *through* the satellite, the communication platform just passes data. The data can be encrypted whether the communication platform supports encryption or not. An Ethernet cable doesn’t support encryption either, and no one cares.

The issue is communication *to* the satellite — commands to, for example, tell it to move to a higher or lower orbit, to change which way its antennas are pointed, or to begin a de-orbit or graveyard orbit burn. They’re saying *that* is not encrypted. If true, then it’s not that the platform can’t be used for sensitive data so much as that you can’t trust that someone won’t inject their own signal and tell it to launch itself into a graveyard orbit 200 miles higher up and render the satellite useless, to power down all of its transponders, or to crash into a nearby satellite.

If true, that’s deeply disturbing. It seems more likely that there is some encryption, but that it is weak or thoroughly broken.

‘Everyone is Stealing TV’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot
A sprawling informal economy of rogue streaming devices has taken hold across the U.S., as consumers fed up with rising TV subscription costs turn to cheap Android-based boxes that promise free access to thousands of live channels, sports events, and on-demand movies for a one-time $200 to $400 purchase.

The two dominant players — SuperBox and vSeeBox — are manufactured by opaque Chinese companies and distributed through hundreds of American resellers at farmers markets, church festivals and Facebook groups, according to a report by The Verge. The hardware is generic and legal, but both devices guide users toward pirate streaming apps not available on any official app store.

vSeeBox directs users to a service called “Heat”; SuperBox points to “Blue TV.” One user estimated access to between 6,000 and 8,000 channels, including premium sports networks and hundreds of local affiliates. A 2025 Dish Network lawsuit against a SuperBox reseller alleged that some live channels on the device were being ripped directly from Dish’s Sling TV service — Sling’s logo was still visible on certain feeds. Dish has pursued resellers aggressively, winning $1.25 million in damages from a vSeeBox seller in 2024 over 500 devices and $405,000 from another over 162 devices. None of this has meaningfully slowed adoption. The market has roots in earlier Chinese-made devices like TVPad that targeted Asian expat communities and reportedly sold 3 million units before being litigated out of existence. SuperBox and vSeeBox simply broadened the audience to mainstream America.

Of course we are: there’s no viable alternative

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’m in the US. The winter Olympics are about to start, and I’d like to watch every possible event, and I’d like to watch them in real time — if possible. (It’s not entirely possible: some of them overlap and I have other things to do, like sleep.)

Despite paying for a cable subscription, despite paying for a premium service, despite having two kinds of devices: I can’t do that. I can’t even come close. What I can do is watch — mostly — delayed, abbreviated, edited versions of events mostly featuring US athletes/teams layered with puff pieces because that’s what NBC is serving up. Yes, there are some happy exceptions to this, and that’s nice, but it’s nowhere close to what I actually want.

So I plan to fire up the VPN and stream whatever I can. Some of the quality will suck and some of the streams will fail and so on, but it’s still much better than what I’m actually paying for.

Similarly, in a few weeks spring training for MLB will start. I would like to buy a subscription that gets me every game involving my favorite team: pre-season, season, post-season: every game. I can’t. When I went through the exercise of trying to figure this out in 2025, I determined that I’d have to pay for 5 — FIVE! — different services and even then, I might miss a game here and there because of obscure and poorly-articulated “blackout” rules that are in play when games are time-shifted to accommodate networks.

So, again, I plan to fire up the VPN and stream whatever I can.

With this in mind, I completely understand why people are buying dodgy devices from dodgy companies that supply dodgy services. It’s much simpler, it’s much cheaper, and — as noted in the referenced article — even if it only works for a few months, it’s still more cost-effective than anything the cable/streaming companies are offering.

These cable/streaming companies have managed — through completely inept management — to turn a golden business opportunity that could make them a fortune into hot garbage…because they couldn’t restrain their greed and their egos. They weren’t content to just make a fortune, they wanted to make an obscene fortune. And so here we are.

Re:The industrial revolution ran over our faces.

By ObliviousGnat • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Industry: “Watching content without paying is stealing. Bad consumers. Pay us.”

I wish I could pay to watch home games, but someone pays the league even more not to let me watch them.

Worse, my tax dollars paid for the stadium they’re playing in. It’s like when we fund pharmaceutical research and then companies patent them and jack up the prices. These things all ought to be in the public domain because the public paid for them.

Re:Unbelievable!

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Also a note that many of the devices are big targets for being members of botnets. So anyone going looking for one of these devices should be very careful.

Re:not everyone

By wirefarm • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I have YouTube premium from back when they had an excellent music service in GooglePlay.

I got rid of it, but then resubscribed so that my cats can watch their bird and squirrel videos uninterrupted.

Seriously.

Re:Piracy is just advanced socialism

By Voyager529 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Time to move beyond “monetising” society and move to a post money society.

Okay Gene Roddenberry…let’s work this out…

We have the technology with AGI now.

And mining the components that make AGI work, sucks…what’s the motivation to do that? “Betterment of society”? Okay…that works for me…but I can’t do this all by myself…can you encourage enough OTHER people to do it for purely altruistic reasons? How about trash removal, or logging, or any number of super dangerous jobs? How about overnight nurses? Our society runs on a whole lot of people doing very-unglamorous jobs, and unless the ENTIRE society is willing to handle sewer cleanings if needed, there will need to be some sort of motivation…but if it isn’t altruism and it isn’t bartering, you’re gonna have to come up with a motivation to do undesirable work, and/or deal with undesirable hours. If those systems go offline at 2AM…someone’s getting “the call”…if there’s no motivation for me to answer that call, I don’t know how that call is going to be answered.

Imagine if “pirates” put in as much passion into producing free housing, education, healthcare and food,

…all of which require a whole lot more commitment, and finite resources…and the possibility of lawsuits for doing the thing you’re proposing. Please let me know how your ‘free restaurant’, ‘free apartment’, or ‘free hospital’ idea would work, in a way that doesn’t involve incentivization, compulsion, or externalizing of the costs.

poverty is a capitalist invention.

No, poverty is the default state of existence. Take away all of modern society, and we’ll spend our days hunting and gathering for our next meal, hoping we don’t get sick or injured, along with everyone else doing the same. Specialization means that one person can spend more time on one task, to the benefit of others, but then that person would have a deficit in other areas. Two specialists exchanging the results of their labor means both people benefit by receiving improved outcomes than if either person were to divide their time…but once you’ve introduced trade, you’ve introduced capitalism. Our current system has many, MANY faults (medical insurance, as a singular example, basically being the worst parts of socialism and capitalism without the best parts of either), but true socialism requires everyone to agree that the value of all goods and services are roughly-similar-enough that everyone’s willing to participate equally and consistently, but once someone comes in and disrupts that, it requires some form of force to maintain the equilibrium. This is why socialism has huge problems scaling beyond small and/or voluntary communities…but if we take away every system and abstraction, some people will successfully hunt and gather on a particular day, some will not. Some will successfully reproduce on a particular day, some will not. Poverty isn’t a capitalist invention, it is what happens if anyone does nothing.

Even on Slashdot we could be posting freely and not need MongoDB in the corner of our site.

Soylent News has no MongoDB ads, but you’re here.