Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Germany Doxes ‘UNKN,’ Head of RU Ransomware Gangs REvil, GandCrab
  2. More Americans Are Breaking Into the Upper Middle Class
  3. Peter Thiel Is Betting Big On Solar-Powered Cow Collars
  4. Copilot Is ‘For Entertainment Purposes Only,’ According To Microsoft’s ToS
  5. Linux Finally Starts Removing Support for Intel’s 37-Year-Old i486 Processor
  6. Russia’s VPN Crackdown Caused Bank Outages, Telegram Founder Says
  7. Artemis Astronauts Enter Moon’s Gravitational Pull, Catch First Glimpses of Far Side
  8. Internet Bug Bounty Pauses Payouts, Citing ‘Expanding Discovery’ From AI-Assisted Research
  9. Claude Code Leak Reveals a ‘Stealth’ Mode for GenAI Code Contributions - and a ‘Frustration Words’ Regex
  10. Hundreds of Theatres Show Apocalyptic-Yet-Optimistic New Movie, ‘The AI Doc’
  11. Will ‘AI-Assisted’ Journalists Bring Errors and Retractions?
  12. Crooks Behind $27M in ‘Refund’ Scams Busted By YouTube Pranksters After Being Lured to Fake Funeral
  13. Apple Brings Device-Level Age Verification to Two More Countries
  14. Chrome 148 Will Start ‘Lazy Loading’ Video and Audio to Improve Performance
  15. Scientists Engineered a Plant To Produce 5 Different Psychedelics At Once

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Germany Doxes ‘UNKN,’ Head of RU Ransomware Gangs REvil, GandCrab

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from KrebsOnSecurity:
An elusive hacker who went by the handle “UNKN” and ran the early Russian ransomware groups GandCrab and REvil now has a name and a face. Authorities in Germany say 31-year-old Russian Daniil Maksimovich Shchukin headed both cybercrime gangs and helped carry out at least 130 acts of computer sabotage and extortion against victims across the country between 2019 and 2021. Shchukin was named as UNKN (a.k.a. UNKNOWN) in an advisory published by the German Federal Criminal Police (the “Bundeskriminalamt” or BKA for short). The BKA said Shchukin and another Russian — 43-year-old Anatoly Sergeevitsch Kravchuk — extorted nearly $2 million euros across two dozen cyberattacks that caused more than 35 million euros in total economic damage.

Germany’s BKA said Shchukin acted as the head of one of the largest worldwide operating ransomware groups GandCrab and REvil, which pioneered the practice of double extortion — charging victims once for a key needed to unlock hacked systems, and a separate payment in exchange for a promise not to publish stolen data. Shchukin’s name appeared in a Feb. 2023 filing (PDF) from the U.S. Justice Department seeking the seizure of various cryptocurrency accounts associated with proceeds from the REvil ransomware gang’s activities. The government said the digital wallet tied to Shchukin contained more than $317,000 in ill-gotten cryptocurrency.
The BKA believes Shchukin resides in Krasnodar, Russia, where he is from. “Based on the investigations so far, it is assumed that the wanted person is abroad, presumably in Russia,” the BKA advised. “Travel behavior cannot be ruled out.”

More Americans Are Breaking Into the Upper Middle Class

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
More Americans have moved into upper-middle-class incomes over the past several decades (source paywalled; alternative source), with new research suggesting that group has grown sharply while the lower and core middle class have shrunk. The Wall Street Journal reports:
In 2024, about 31% of Americans were part of the upper middle class, up from about 10% in 1979, according to a report released this year by the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute. There is no single, standard definition of middle class, or upper middle class, and what counts as a hefty income in one city can feel paltry in another. The AEI report, by Stephen Rose and Scott Winship, classified a family of three earning $133,000 to $400,000 in 2024 dollars as upper middle class. Households earning more were categorized as rich. The analysis looked just at incomes, not assets such as stocks or real estate.

[…] The gains span generations. Many baby boomers, born to parents who grew up in the Great Depression, are living well on their savings, aided by steady Social Security checks and decades of stock-portfolio gains that they can now tap. Millennials, who everyone worried would be permanently set back by the 2008-09 financial crisis, are earning solid incomes, buying homes and surpassing their parents. Many families are surprised to find that they have moved into this new economic tier, and see themselves as comfortable, not rich. They tend to have jobs that are white collar but not flashy — think accountants, not tech founders.

This doesn’t mean that all Americans are climbing the ladder. Entrenched inflation and higher prices on major necessities have pushed many families closer to the financial edge, or locked them out of homeownership. Those costs weigh on high-earning families too, and for many are the reason they don’t feel wealthy. The AEI report divided families into five different groups by income. Three groups were in the middle: lower middle class, core middle class and upper middle class. The authors found that more families now fall into the two highest-earning groups — upper middle class and rich — and fewer fall into the three lower-earning categories.

Really?

By deadweight • Score: 4, Informative Thread
133K is upper middle class?? Wow, I have been a lot richer than I ever thought. Maybe in some flyover town that is big money, on either coast that is “at least I am not on food stamps” money. That is a school teacher married to a cop money. In places where a cheap house is $450K, that is not Upper anything.

you’re absolutely right, don’t trust AEI

By Somervillain • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

A cynic might suggest that the threshold was chosen in part to make the numbers work out for a pre-determined conclusion.

They just want to justify tax breaks for the wealthy by saying 31% of Americans will benefit…when in reality, only 2% or less truly get more than they lose from a typical Republican tax cut. Nope, those tariffs are not failing!!! Look, more people are getting wealthy!!! No need to look into tax reform or making sure billionaires pay more!

Re:Good

By korgitser • Score: 5, Informative Thread
That’s the point of TFA, to sound good, to create the impression that the country is no the right track and life is getting better for the people. Decades of people entering upper middle class, sure, if you play with the definition a bit.

Meanwhile two thirds of the nation cannot afford a $500 emergency expense https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/3… and are one hospital visit away from the streets https://www.marketwatch.com/st…

Re:Really?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

133K is upper middle class??

Well, it is definitely a politically-loaded question… but it doesn’t seem totally unreasonable, at least based on population percentages. They said “middle class” not “rich”; this is for a family of three, which nowadays means two incomes in the majority of cases; and $133K was chosen as the very bottom of the “upper middle class” window.

Pew is considered rather less politically biased than the Wall Street Journal; but in 2022 they gave the following broad-brush definitions for a family of three:

Lower-income (28% of US population): Under $56,600 per year
Middle-income (52% of US population): Between $56,600 and $169,800 per year
Upper-income (19% of US population): Above $169,800 per year

There are certainly a lot of political side questions one could ask, like - should we really consider it to be “middle-class” if a person can’t afford to buy a house?

Re:Good

By Frobnicator • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It does not sound grounded in reality as well.

This. The lower end of those “upper middle class” numbers may qualify for welfare in some tech hub cities.

They do point out that it varies by location, but really their number range is terrible. “classified a family of three earning $133,000 to $400,000 in 2024 dollars as upper middle class.” From the HUD Section 8 income limits, expensive places the lower end of that is considered low income, like San Jose 143,600 qualifies for Section 8, versus cities like Akron where 72,250 is low enough to qualify. Location, location, location.

As this is /. lots of us live in tech hubs that even though we don’t like the costs, they’re very expensive places to live. In my current city despite being a full hour commute from the city center 130K is still solidly middle class. Not poverty, but not upper crust either. That income wouldn’t require a trailer park, but would have a hard time affording a 3 bedroom / 2 bath home (they’d add another 45+ minutes to the commute distance), one or possibly two small vacations per year.

In tech hubs especially, those household incomes can be very middle class, not upper-middle, and in some places, lower class lifestyles.

Peter Thiel Is Betting Big On Solar-Powered Cow Collars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Halter, a New Zealand agtech startup now valued at $2 billion, has raised $220 million to expand its AI-powered cattle management system. “Halter is now valued at $2 billion following the Series E, which was led by Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund with participation from Blackbird, DCVC, Bond, Bessemer, and several others,” reports Inc. From the report:
alter plans to use the funding to expand its existing footprint in the U.S., Australia, and New Zealand, as well as to grow into new markets such as Ireland, the U.K., and parts of North and South America. The round is one of the biggest to-date in the industry, and comes amid growing adoption of the technology among U.S. ranchers. According to Halter, U.S. ranchers have erected some 60,000 miles of virtual fencing since the company’s launch in 2024.

Halter’s technology works through a system of solar-powered collars and in-pasture towers that collect data — some 6,000 data points per collar per minute — from grazing cattle and feed it into a cloud-based platform and app for farmers. The collars are ergonomically designed to be comfortable for the cattle wearing them, and leverage AI to play audio cues or vibrate when it is time to move to a different grazing location or if they step outside of a predetermined zone. The collars can also deliver an electric pulse if an animal does not respond.

Halter’s app also creates a digital twin of a ranch, which essentially means a digital replica that leverages real-time data to accurately reflect conditions. Farmers can consult the app to check on their herd, or fence, and move cattle with just a few clicks. Halter also has a proprietary algorithm that it calls a “Cowgorithm” trained on seven billion hours of animal behavior. Altogether, this technology is meant to make ranchers’ lives easier when herding cattle, help them save money on building physical fencing, and provide insights about pasture management to improve soil health and pasture productivity. Halter says some 2,000 farmers and ranchers currently use its tech worldwide.

Test run

By RitchCraft • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Nothing to see here. Just a test run of the human collars coming in ~2040. Shocking, I know.

Re:Get a Border Collie

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The real question is it cheaper and easier to slap a collar on something than put up fences, train dogs, and hunt down strays. Manual labor is expensive and ranchers aren’t exactly the type of folks to spend on new fangled tech that doesn’t work. There’s plenty of other ag tech that’s been adopted over the years from milking machines to GPS-enabled tractors getting data on fertilizer placement. And the farmer’s that haven’t been pushed out of business have enough sense to do the calculations on return on investment on how tech investments will affect their bottom line.

Udderly terrible

By nospam007 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

It sounds like Peter Thiel is really trying to moo-ve the needle on AgTech.

If these collars are solar-powered, I guess you could say the ‘steaks’ have never been higher.

This idea seems solid

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’ve got plenty of gripes about Thiel, and the 2-billion dollar valuation is the standard I-estimate-my-company-as-being-worth-all-teh-mmmoonnaayyy.

But this idea seems solid and worth pursuing. It’s a real market, for real goods, that probably could benefit from some tech. There’s use case is extremely low on buzzwords. No AI. No blockchain. No crypto. Just a solid case for a hardware/software system that could probably improve actual physical productivity in an easily measurable way. The argument for using cloud infrastructure is pretty compelling.

The kicker is if costs can be low enough to justify, that’s a LOT of fairly advanced hardware to purchase, install, and deal with wear and tear in an aggressive outdoor physical environment, in order to get my cows to grow 20 percent better. Is it worth it? I have no clue, but that’s gonna be the main question to answer. Agriculture is a very-low-bullsh&t industry.

To the people who are griping about Thiel planning to use this on humans. Your worries are 5 years too late. We’re already shackled to devices that monitor and occasionally prod us in various directions. They’re about 7cm by 14cm by 1cm and we THINK that we’re the ones in control but who are we kidding?

Re:This idea seems solid

By swillden • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

But this idea seems solid and worth pursuing. It’s a real market, for real goods, that probably could benefit from some tech.

Agreed. I live in the mountain west, and our forest and mountain landscapes are just covered with fencing, even though most of it is public land, because it’s BLM “multi-use” land — a lot of cattle graze on it. Fences are expensive to build and expensive to maintain. If you think a fence is something you build once and then ignore, you’ve never dealt with cattle.

Cowboys (and sheep herders) have a term “ride fence” as in “Bob, you’re gonna ride fence today”, and it’s a regular and tedious task that means “get on your horse (or ATV) and ride past miles and miles of fenceline, looking for places where the fence is broken or going to break, and fixing them”. It’s necessary and expensive drudgery and having all of those fencelines is bad for other uses, and bad for wildlife. I’ve put down a few deer that jumped a barbed wire fence and didn’t quite clear it, slicing their guts open and leaving them in agony as they slowly die.

In addition, there’s an obvious tension between the cost of building and maintaining fences and the cost of rounding up cattle when it’s time to move them. Obviously if you slice the land up into lots of small fenced areas, the cattle will be easy to find — but they’re also going to graze it out fast, so you’re going to have to move them more often. If you use very large enclosures (common on BLM land), then your cows may have hundreds of square miles to roam and feed… but when it’s time to move them you have to find them. Luckily they’re herd animals so when you find a few you’ve found them all, but still. And occasionally, singles get separated from the herd and you just lose them, which isn’t great since a cow is worth about $2k.

So… if we can replace those miles of expensive and constantly-breaking fences with virtual fences, that’s good news for everyone. Wildlife and outdoorsmen can roam unimpeded, cattle can be far more tightly controlled, strays quickly identified, located and reunited with the herd — via remote control!. This is an innovative idea that is worth quite a lot.

Copilot Is ‘For Entertainment Purposes Only,’ According To Microsoft’s ToS

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
AI skeptics aren’t the only ones warning users not to unthinkingly trust models’ outputs — that’s what the AI companies say themselves in their terms of service. Take Microsoft, which is currently focused on getting corporate customers to pay for Copilot. But it’s also been getting dinged on social media over Copilot’s terms of use, which appear to have been last updated on October 24, 2025. “Copilot is for entertainment purposes only,” the company warned. “It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk.”
Microsoft described the terms of service as "legacy language,” saying it will be updated.

Tom’s Hardware notes that similar AI warnings remain common across the industry, with companies like OpenAI and xAI also cautioning users not to treat chatbot output as “the truth” or as “a sole service of truth or factual information.”

Everything is Copilot

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
This statement gets scarier with how many “Copilots” exist in Microsoft products.

Can confirm

By CEC-P • Score: 3, Funny Thread
My very first copilot experience a few weeks ago was when they stuffed it into Word and I wrote something like
2/22/26 - thing happened
2/23/26 - meeting with whoever

And the completely unpromoted and unrequested in any way summary was “a list of events that happened in Feb 1926”
So it is sort of entertaining, except I had shit to do that day other than babysitting a useless vibe coded pile of garbage that’s raising my RAM and SSD and electricity prices, which is significantly less entertaining now that I think of it.

It is rather amazing

By DarkOx • Score: 3 Thread

In what other industry can you say,
“We think our product is great/safe/reliable/… but no we absolutely won’t stand behind it if anything goes wrong.” and have that no impact the marketability.
I am not talking legal or anything like that, just purely from a sales and customer relationship perspective.

Just imagine a GM ad;

“The 2026 Silverado our most capable pickup ever!” - Read in deep dramatic voice
“Remember Chevrolote Silverado models are for entertainment purposely” -Read as the image fades to black in higher pitch at 2x speed.

  It would be scandal..but when Microsoft does it, hardly anyone even blinks.

so like faux news

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Due to this news, I suggest we refer to it from here on out as “fauxpilot”.

Linux Finally Starts Removing Support for Intel’s 37-Year-Old i486 Processor

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“It’s finally time,” writes Phoronix — since “no known Linux distribution vendors are still shipping with i486 CPU support.”

“A patch queued into one of the development branches ahead of the upcoming Linux 7.1 merge window is set to finally begin the process of phasing out and ultimately removing Intel 486 CPU support from the Linux kernel.”

More details from XDA-Developers:
Authored by Ingo Molnar, the change, titled “x86/cpu: Remove M486/M486SX/ELAN support,” begins dismantling Linux’s built-in support for the i486, which was first released back in 1989. As the changelog notes, even Linus is keen to cut ties with the architecture: “In the x86 architecture we have various complicated hardware emulation facilities on x86-32 to support ancient 32-bit CPUs that very very few people are using with modern kernels. This compatibility glue is sometimes even causing problems that people spend time to resolve, which time could be spent on other things. As Linus recently remarked: ‘I really get the feeling that it’s time to leave i486 support behind. There’s zero real reason for anybody to waste one second of development effort on this kind of issue’…”

If you’re one of the rare few who still keep the decades-old CPU alive, your best bet will be to grab an LTS Linux distro that keeps the older version of Linux for a few more years.

Pray tell, what modern desktop runs in 64MB of RAM

By Pizza • Score: 5, Informative Thread

…Because that’s the upper limit of high-end 486 motherboards.

The 80486 was essentially e-waste by the year 2000. Even ultra-conservative Debian completely dropped support for the i486 over decade ago (with Squeeze going out of LTS in Feburary of 2016 after a 5 year run)

Incidently, the first Linux install I ever performed was in early 1997, on an ISA-only 486DX33 motherboard +200MB pre-DMA IDE drive that I literally rescued from the trash.

Re:Typical Stupidity

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

and also needs modern kernel features

This is a part everyone seems to miss when the get freaked out about Linux itself or some distribution dropping support for something 30 years old…

In 2026 if you are still using a computer older than mid-90s (and very more than likely even one from after the mid 90s) it is because it is part of some very specific process that almost certainly has you not making changes, which are almost certain to include software changes too.

Just because Linux 7.x can’t be built for i486 any more does not stop you from grabbing any prior version and using that. Thinking about 486s specifically, I know there are actually a lot of odd things like hardened industrialized PCs and some routers and the like running licensed 486 cores and late manufacturing Intel parts; that are still in use. You can even still buy some new. It would not surprise me to learn people are running Linux on a good number of them, it would surprise me to learn people are running Linux newer than 5.10 or 5.15 on them. Even in the most exotic memory configurations a 486 is going to top out at 3.5GBs of memory, I guess you could do nearer to 4GB on a ISA only system (No PCI or VLB). You really going burn 16MB or more of that just on the kernel?

Let’s be real if you are running a 468 you are probably using using Linux 2.0 - 2.6 already. Not being able to use 7 hardly affects you.

Re: Hubble out of support

By iabervon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It uses VRTX, reportedly. Linux wasn’t suitable as a real-time OS when the Hubble was designed, or really even when the Hubble got the 486 installed in 2009.

Re:Typical Stupidity

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Using IOT devices with kernel 2.6 in these days is just asking to be hacked.

Not really…

Almost all IoT devices work by phoning home. They call some remote server, and do some API stuff, send some message poll for new messages / instructions. They tend to have very little if anything listening.

If they do get onwd its because the infrastructure that supports them gets compromised, at which point its really the infrastructure that was hacked and not the device. The other thing that happens - all the gosh darn time - is what ever little web based interface they have for setting up wifi/IP settings/etc is some terrible CGI thing with some form of injection vulnerability. Again though if that gets pwnt, it is only after some ofther failure of your internal network security. That is a concern, I understand defense in depth, I get foothold and dwell time issues, However a newer kernel won’t prevent that kind of compromise. Lack of shell escaping on calls to system() or bad choices around using eval() will get you popped on Linux 7.0 as easily as 2.0.

Re:Typical Stupidity

By Voice of satan • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Not sure what you mean by “mainstream” but the BSD distros do. :)

Russia’s VPN Crackdown Caused Bank Outages, Telegram Founder Says

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Russia’s "great crackdown” on VPNs — and a clampdown on Telegram’s messaging platform — had an unintended side effect, reports Bloomberg. It “triggered the widespread banking outage seen across the country this week, Telegram’s billionaire founder Pavel Durov said.”
“Telegram was banned in Russia, yet 65 million Russians still use it daily via VPNs,” Durov said Saturday in a post on Telegram. “The government has spent years trying to ban VPNs too. Their blocking attempts just triggered a massive banking failure; cash briefly became the only payment method nationwide yesterday.” Attempts on Friday to limit VPN use could have sparked the disruption affecting banking apps, The Bell and other Russian media reported, citing industry sources who weren’t identified.

The outage may have been caused by an overload in the filtering systems run by Russia’s communications watchdog, according to the reports, with experts warning that major restrictions risk undermining network stability… Separately, payments for Apple Inc.‘s app store and other services became unavailable in Russia from April 1, the US company said on its website, without saying why. Earlier, RBC newswire reported that the Digital Development Ministry had asked mobile operators to disable top-ups, which could help limit VPN use....

Durov, who’s being investigated in Russia for allegedly aiding terrorist activity, compared the situation in his home country to Iran, where similar restrictions prompted widespread adoption of VPNs instead of the intended shift to state-backed messaging apps. “Welcome back to the Digital Resistance, my Russian brothers and sisters,” said Durov, who has lived in Dubai and France in recent years. “The entire nation is now mobilized to bypass these absurd restrictions,” he wrote, adding that Telegram would continue adapting to make its traffic harder to detect and block.

Slack Huddles

By Malc • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Slack Huddles have also been taken out for most of the past month too. Slack in general still works, but huddles see people unable to join or continuously losing their connection. It also might be ISP specific (some users can use huddles, while the majority cannot). The general consensus amongst my Russian team members is that it’s mostly about Telegram and broad blocking or filtering of AWS IP address ranges. Maybe it’s something else, it’s hard to say.

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely

By Artem S. Tashkinov • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Under Putin and his cronies, Russia has been drifting towards North Korea under the pretext of fighting with NATO. Money that could have been spent on education, science, healthcare and even space has been diverted to the war, where a new group of people are now stealing state money even more proficiently than before. With normal state contracts, there is at least some oversight; in war, you can steal everything and blame it on anything you want.

The internet is just one of many ways in which freedoms are being restricted. The war on VPNs exists for the sole purpose of controlling all information inflows and outflows, and even communications for its own citizens. Years ago, Viber, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter were banned, and more recently, WhatsApp, Wire and, to a large extent, Telegram followed. Nowadays, you’re expected to only use the state-developed and controlled Max messenger, where anything you say goes straight to the Kremlin.

Funnily enough, Putin doesn’t stop there. He knows how privatisation was carried out in the early ‘90s, so the oligarchs who helped him rise to power and increase his authority, ultimately allowing him to rule for life, are no longer safe. They can lose everything they’ve grabbed in an instant under any pretext. That’s been happening for years now.

Anyone who has opposed the government has either been physically eliminated, such as Navalny and Nemtsov, or jailed. The rest have escaped the country and now live in exile. If you dare to say anything against the war, the government or Putin himself, it is tantamount to treason and is punished by conscription into the army, extermination or up to 15 years in prison. The police are very well paid and on the government payroll, so they will beat the hell out of you if you try to hold a rally alone in any public square in a major Russian city. Anyone who still criticizes the government publicly is branded a foreign agent.

And the Russian people continue to endure despite their quality of life falling through the floor, runaway inflation, an inability to buy foreign goods and services, an inability to travel freely, and having to deal with an infinite number of flight delays for those who can still afford to travel to other countries.

I’m struggling to understand who still supports any of this. It’s not enough to be a vatnik anymore; you have to be a literally insane vatnik.

It’s quite sad that the West could have intervened in the years leading up to the Bolotnaya Square case, but decided that the Russians could figure it out themselves. The result is an authoritarian mafia state that is destroying its own country while continuing to funnel most of its profits to the West. Most of these people raise their children in the West, send them to Western universities and the kids barely speak Russian themselves.

If you ever thought that this was all being done to make Russia truly independent, it’s all a sham and a faÃade. The real foreign agents who are doing everything to make Russia less competitive reside in the Kremlin.

Russia rivals Norway and the UAE when it comes to natural resources. This vast wealth could have been used to transform Russia into a literal paradise on earth. Instead, however, it is being spent on destroying a neighbour that dared to assert its allegiance to the West.

It’s pure insanity.

Re:And soon for sure we will be in

By quonset • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

However, it was Obama and Biden that laid the groundwork for the war against Ukraine

This site needs to filter out AI-generated nonsense. It’s both hilarious and annoying to have these hallucinations posted.

It’s especially annoying when the AI can’t be bothered to do the slightest bit of research and read The Budapet Memorandum. We know AI can’t understand what it means, but it could at least scan it into its database.

Idle hands are the devils workshop

By WaffleMonster • Score: 3 Thread

I’m not so sure it is even in Putler’s interests to be doing this. I assume he wants to ratchet up exposure to regime propaganda and deny the ability to use technology to organize opposition to his regime.

Yet the immediate impact of widely unpopular bans coinciding with embarrassing war related losses, exhaustion and economic decline will only trigger the politicization of a population that will increasingly cut against him.

Artemis Astronauts Enter Moon’s Gravitational Pull, Catch First Glimpses of Far Side

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
NASA’s Artemis astronauts are now entering “the lunar sphere of influence,” reports NBC News, “meaning the pull of the moon’s gravity will become stronger than Earth’s.” Now as they begin their swing around the moon, the Artemis astronauts “are chasing after Apollo 13’s maximum range from Earth,” reports the Associated Press, hoping to beat its distance from Earth by more than 4,100 miles (6,600 kilometers).

They’ll begin their six-hour lunar flyby 14 hours from now (at 2:45 p.m. ET Monday). But in a space-to-earth interview Saturday with NBC News, the astronauts were already describing their first glimpses of the edge of the far side:
[NASA astronaut Christina Koch realized] it looked different from what she was accustomed to on Earth. “The darker parts just aren’t quite in the right place,” she said. “And something about you senses that is not the moon that I’m used to seeing....”

[Astronaut Reid] Wiseman called the flight a “magnificent accomplishment” and said the astronauts’ ability to gaze at both Earth and the moon from their spacecraft has been “truly awe-inspiring.” “The Earth is almost in full eclipse. The moon is almost in full daylight, and the only way you could get that view is to be halfway between the two entities,” he said… And while the early photos of Earth and the moon that [Canadian astronaut Jeremy] Hansen and his colleagues have beamed back have been spectacular, the Canadian astronaut said they pale in comparison to the real deal outside their capsule’s windows. “I know those photos are amazing,” he said, “but let me assure you, it is another level of amazing up here.”
And their upcoming six-hour lunar flyby “promises views of the moon’s far side that were too dark or too difficult to see by the 24 Apollo astronauts who preceded them,” notes the Associated Press:
A total solar eclipse also awaits them as the moon blocks the sun, exposing snippets of shimmering corona.... At closest approach, they will come within 4,070 miles (6,550 kilometers) of the moon. Because they launched on April 1, the rendezvous won’t have as much of the far lunar side illuminated as other dates would have. But the crew still will be able make out “definite chunks of the far side that have never been seen” by humans, said NASA geologist Kelsey Young, including a good portion of Orientale Basin.

They’ll call down their observations as they photograph the gray, pockmarked scenes. There’s a suite of professional-quality cameras on board, and each astronaut also has an iPhone for more informal, spur-of-the-minute picture-taking… Orion will be out of contact with Mission Control for nearly an hour when it’s behind the moon. The same thing happened during the Apollo moonshots. NASA is relying on its Deep Space Network to communicate with the crew, but the giant antennas in California, Spain and Australia won’t have a direct line of sight when Orion disappears behind the moon for approximately 40 minutes…

Once Artemis II departs the lunar neighborhood, it will take four days to return home. The capsule will aim for a splashdown in the Pacific near San Diego on April 10, nine days after its Florida launch. During the flight back, the astronauts will link up via radio with the crew of the orbiting International Space Station. This is the first time that a moon crew has colleagues in space at the same time and NASA can’t pass up the opportunity for a cosmic chitchat.

It certainly is, IF…

By tiqui • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

you want human beings to ever be anything more than scurrying about on Earth becoming gradually better at killing each other until they eventually succeed or the sun burns out (your choice).

Here’s the thing: ANY human voyage to any other place in the universe will be vastly more difficult and dangerous and require more time away from Terra Firma. Therefore, the Moon is a perfect place to learn what we need to learn, and to practice (and get good at) the things we will need to be excellent at in order to manage ANY further exploration. If we cannot get the toilet right on a lunar mission, then any other space destination is right out. We could learn all the same lessons with a destination like Mars, BUT that would be vastly more expensive, and take a huge amount of additional time (each flight would take months vs days, and the launch windows are years apart rather than weeks apart). This is what even Elon Musk has recently surrendered to. When we have mastered the regular lunar flights with sustained time on the lunar surface, we will finally know how to learn to do Mars without going bankrupt and killing lots of crews.

Humans are more capable on site ....

By drnb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
A human on site is far more capable than a robot. A robot will have far greater endurance at a site. Which is better depends on the mission, the tasks to be done.

Also a big part of these missions is to develop and test the tech necessary for manned missions.

Its really all about logistics

By drnb • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Mars will likely require the following infrastructure: space station in earth orbit, space station in lunar orbit, lunar base, space station in orbit around mars, and then a mars base. Like military operations, it’s all really about logistics. Can we squeak in a direct recon flight, sure, but more serious stuff will require infrastructure.

Toss in some local acquisition and processing of resources at some point. Ex H2 O2 — for air, water, and fuel.

Re:Did they find..

By drnb • Score: 5, Funny Thread

..the secret nazi moon base with space nazi’s?

Spazis?

Re:Did they find..

By sosume • Score: 4, Funny Thread

The entire mission is obviously an AI fake. As acclaimed physicist Joe Rogan explained, they crew would be dead once they’d hit the Van Allen Radiation Belt (tm)

Internet Bug Bounty Pauses Payouts, Citing ‘Expanding Discovery’ From AI-Assisted Research

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Internet Bug Bounty program “has been paused for new submissions,” they announced last week.

Running since 2012, the program is funded by “a number of leading software companies,” reports InfoWorld, “and has awarded more than $1.5m to researchers who have reported bugs "
Up to now, 80% of its payouts have been for discoveries of new flaws, and 20% to support remediation efforts. But as artificial intelligence makes it easier to find bugs, that balance needs to change, HackerOne said in a statement. “AI-assisted research is expanding vulnerability discovery across the ecosystem, increasing both coverage and speed. The balance between findings and remediation capacity in open source has substantively shifted,” said HackerOne.

Among the first programs to be affected is the Node.js project, a server-side JavaScript platform for web applications known for its extensive ecosystem. While the project team will continue to accept and triage bug reports through HackerOne, without funding from the Internet Bug Bounty program it will no longer pay out rewards, according to an announcement on its website…

[J]ust last month, Google also put a halt to AI-generated submissions provided to its Open Source Software Vulnerability Reward Program.
The Internet Bug Bounty stressed that “We have a responsibility to the community to ensure this program effectively accomplishes its ambitious dual purpose: discovery and remediation. Accordingly, we are pausing submissions while we consider the structure and incentives needed to further these goals…”

“We remain committed to strengthening open source security. Working with project maintainers and researchers, we’re actively evaluating solutions to better align incentives with open source ecosystem realities and ensure vulnerability discoveries translate into durable remediation outcomes.”

I didn’t read the article…

By Brain-Fu • Score: 3 Thread

…but that sure won’t stop me from passing judgment!

This sounds like a clear case of “AI makes it so easy to find bugs now, that we don’t need to pay out cash to incite others to do it anymore.”

The great adjustening of labor value

By T34L • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think this is a pretty great bottled example of well how AI can be simultaneously super transformative to society and at the same time how companies like OpenAI and Anthropic can be insanely overvalued and presenting a colossal bubble of sentiment that’s never going to see long term return on investment.

Lot of the currently seemingly lucrative uses of AI that promise to make big bucks for anyone with their fingers in the pie are based on observations that hey; there’s this whole million dollar market that you can profit off of insanely easily with a clawdbot running on your DGX Spark or whatever.

Except it turns out that once enough people get that idea they first overwhelm the next immediate bottleneck; the validation that the “fixes” of bugs don’t introduce other bugs, or worse yet, deliberate backdoors or something else, and before the dust of that settles, it turns out now everyone has the same sauce you tried to sell them for fraction of the cost they’d have ever considered paying to you.

And so, what looked like a lucrative oilwell swollen with potential got throttled to a drip of selective access and additional friction to your attempt at exploiting it that wasn’t there until you arrived with your extraction system.

Meanwhile, as you struggle to get the return on investment on your overgrown Bugfixing Someone Else’s Code Factory, cheaper, more flexible and most importantly, more verifiable semi-automated bugfixing makes it into the internal pipelines of your would-be-customers, and they deploy their AI alongside their existing programmers who have just the know how needed to achieve the same thing at fraction of trial and error (and thus compute) and with out of band information (and thus less model and dataset complexity) that you needed to get it to work at all.

Similarly, there seems to be a strong notion that all those bizfolk have all those ditzy secretaries, and all they do? They churn out polite worded emails to other bizfolk, and then decipher polite worded emails coming back, maybe copy some numbers between excel spreadsheets back and forth. And all that for like five grand a month! You want that money, and so you present the email’n’excel service can get all that money for itself and only costs you a little bit of a datacenter to run. Except, whoops, two years down the line a Chinese company starts selling a NUC sized paperweight that can do all the same without a subscription and with all that precious customer’s bizinfo staying exclusively on-premise, which your prospective customers seem weirdly picky about after you had two dozen major data leaks.

Of, course the economy of scale and capital consolidation will always give advantage to large companies with lot of money, but all it takes is for you, the leading position capitalist to make just a couple of bad bets and end up having your lunch eaten by competitors fraction your size (Intel); I’m fairly sure even Nvidia isn’t immune to that, especially as now the very code development ease they enable eats away the moat of client lock in; CUDA and the rest of their software framework (it’ll be real interesting to see when “cleanroom derivatives” of that whole stack start popping up), plus having the pretty sizeable chunk of the world forced to look for alternatives for political reasons (USGov trying to throttle the flow of compute capability of China truly is a more potent innovation motivator for companies within china than the Chinese Party could ever hope to try come up with, let alone enforce).

World sure is changing a lot, and everyone’s squinting at the future, but lot of the big, high level decisions being made sure seem as short sighted as ever.

Re:I didn’t read the article…

By Petersko • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Money for bounties is not infinite. If the pace of claims is so large that you can’t fix them all and you can’t afford to pay the bounties, you stop. Makes perfect sense to me.

Re:I didn’t read the article…

By test321 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

True, but I think this is a phase. AI is going to find thousands of bugs in the coming year, that are low hanging fruit for its AI capabilities. bug bounty programme shouldn’t pay for that.
But as development teams integrate AI, old code gets fixed and new code won’t include bugs AI can find. Then the usefulness of AI bug reports will decrease again, until a new baseline where humans security teams (using AI tools and also their brains) are needed to find the bugs that AI can’t figure.

Claude Code Leak Reveals a ‘Stealth’ Mode for GenAI Code Contributions - and a ‘Frustration Words’ Regex

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
That leak of Claude Code‘s source code “revealed all kinds of juicy details,” writes PC World.

The more than 500,000 lines of code included:

- An ‘undercover mode’ for Claude that allows it to make ‘stealth’ contributions to public code bases
- An ‘always-on’ agent for Claude Code
- A Tamagotchi-style ‘Buddy’ for Claude

“But one of the stranger bits discovered in the leak is that Claude Code is actively watching our chat messages for words and phrases — including f-bombs and other curses — that serve as signs of user frustration.”
Specifically, Claude Code includes a file called “userPromptKeywords.ts” with a simple pattern-matching tool called regex, which sweeps each and every message submitted to Claude for certain text matches. In this particular case, the regex pattern is watching for “wtf,” “wth,” “omfg,” “dumbass,” “horrible,” “awful,” “piece of — -" (insert your favorite four-letter word for that one), “f — you,” “screw this,” “this sucks,” and several other colorful metaphors… While the Claude Code leak revealed the existence of the “frustration words” regex, it doesn’t give any indication of why Claude Code is scouring messages for these words or what it’s doing with them.

Re:What I find amusing is…

By Mal-2 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

LLMs don’t actually know their own capabilities.The description of what they *should* do is baked into the training data, but this doesn’t always correlate with their actual abilities. Sometimes they can do things and not even know, and they can’t tell if tools they should have are being disabled in some way. For example, Qwen 3.5 is a vision-capable model, but enabling vision in llama.cpp requires loading an additional file with the —mmproj parameter. The model will think it has vision enabled whether the extra file is loaded or not.

Re:What I find amusing is…

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Informative Thread

My understanding is that the code leak covers the client-side tool, not the LLM. Did I misunderstand?

Because there isn’t any reason why the LLM would know all of the capabilities of the tool. The LLM would only “know” whatever documentation the tool provides about itself in the posts it sends to the LLM as part of the user’s posts. That and possibly information about the tool that might be in training data or available online for the tool to retrieve via a web scour.

Frustration watch to improve retention

By fleeped • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

IMO it’s not rocket science - if the user is frustrated, start being extra manipulative, agreeable and soothing, to avoid losing customers.

Re:Could someone post the frustration regex code?

By quenda • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Ask Claude? He says:

This came out of the accidental Claude Code source leak on March 31, 2026, when Anthropic accidentally shipped a source map in their npm package exposing ~512,000 lines of TypeScript source code.
The regex lives in a file called userPromptKeywords.ts and looks like this:
/\b(wtf|wth|ffs|omfg|shit(ty|tiest)?|dumbass|horrible|awful|
piss(ed|ing)? off|piece of (shit|crap|junk)|what the (fuck|hell)|
fucking? (broken|useless|terrible|awful|horrible)|fuck you|
screw (this|you)|so frustrating|this sucks|damn it)\b/

Alex Kim’s blog
As for what it’s for: according to researcher Alex Kim, who first documented it, the signal doesn’t change the model’s behavior or responses — it’s a product health metric to track whether users are getting frustrated, and whether that rate goes up or down across releases.

So Frustrated of Winning #definitelyNotATantrum

By dohzer • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Here are some timely frustration words to add to the list: “Fuckin’", “bastards”. You’re welcome, and in the words of Donald Trump, “Praise be to Allah”.

Hundreds of Theatres Show Apocalyptic-Yet-Optimistic New Movie, ‘The AI Doc’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Hundreds of theatres are now showing a new documentary called The AI Doc: Or How I Became An Apocaloptimist. Variety calls it “playful and heady,“edited “with a spirit of ADHD alertness.” The New York Times suggests it “tries to cover so much that it ends up being more confusing than clarifying, but parts are fascinating.”

But the Los Angeles Times calls it an "aggravating soup of information and opinion that wants to move at the speed of machine thought.” So while co-director Daniel Roher asks whether he should bring a child into a world with AI, “Perhaps more urgently, should Roher have made an AI doc that treats us like children?”
First, he parades all the safety doomers, seeming to believe their warnings that an unfeeling superintelligence is upon us and we can’t trust it. Then, sufficiently disturbed, he hauls in the AI cheerleaders, a suspiciously positive gang who can envision only medical miracles and grindless lives in which we’re all full-time artists. Only then, after this simplistic setup where platitudes reign, do we get the section in which the subject is treated like the brave (and grave) new world it is: geopolitically fraught, economically tenuous and a playground for billionaires.

Why couldn’t the complexity have been the dialogue from the beginning, instead of the play-dumb cartoon “The AI Doc” feels like for so long? Maybe Roher believes this is what our increasingly gullible, truth-challenged citizenry needs from an explanatory doc: a flashy, kindhearted reminder that we’re the change we need to be.
Read more reactions here and here. Mashable warns the documentary’s director “will ultimately craft a journey that feels like a panic attack in real time. In the end, you may not feel better about mankind’s chances against the rise of AI. But you’ll likely feel less helpless in the future before us all.”

They also point out that the film “shares some ways its audience can more actively be apart of the conversation, and provides a link to the film’s website for engagement,” where 6,948 people have now signed up for its newsletter. (“Demand a seat at the table,” urges its signup button, under a warning that “Government and AI companies are designing our future without us. We need to reclaim our voice in shaping the future of AI…”)

This movie explains the situation well..

By atrimtab • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

for your non tech industry associates and relatives.

The conclusion will hopefully start a lot of discussions and activism to prevent the dystopia path, the chaos path or extinction path.

Like this deep more complete one or the Schoolhouse afterschool special version.

Good to raise awareness on AI future

By oumuamua • Score: 3 Thread
The best thing is to envision the end goal - a society like Iain Bank’s The Culture - and fight any changes deviating from that goal. Have not seen movie but good comments on Rotten Tomatoes

Take all of the YouTube videos made about this subject and combine them into almost two hours of even more gibberish, to arrive at no conclusion whatsoever, by a bunch of people that know, but won’t tell you because they love to hear themselves talk, and save the 18 bucks you will pay for a ticket. Production value is not great, very silly and millenialish. It says nothing, clears nothing, and tries to be “innovative” but fails. Ai IS a problem more than a solution and this movie reiterates what we already know: The mega rich are in charge of this too and will use it to control absolutely everything causing more devastation than now. But this movie fails to ask the hard questions - it’s all a big “who cares?”. Not interesting at all. It has been said that Ai will be “a new species” that will control humans like we controlled the world when we came along - but the subject never even came up - in almost two hours? Booo.

Guillermo Q

The film is well crafted but doesn’t address the elephant in the room. As the world cycles to late stage capitalism, fascism, and authoritarianism, the final message to “get involved” rings hollow. Three CEO’s of major AI companies are interviewed and there is no direct interrogation “what are YOU going to do to help ensure the best outcomes?!” I don’t think you get to start a documentary with the quote “I know people who work on AI risk who don’t expect their children to make it to high school” and then end the film by placing the burden on the audience.

Robin G

Will ‘AI-Assisted’ Journalists Bring Errors and Retractions?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Meet the “journalist” who “uploads press releases or analyst notes into AI tools and prompts them to spit out articles that he can edit and publish quickly,” according to the Wall Street Journal.

“AI-assisted stories accounted for nearly 20% of Fortune‘s web traffic in the second half of 2025.” And most were written by 42-year-old Nick Lichtenberg, who has now written over 600 AI-assisted stories, producing “more stories in six months than any of his colleagues at Fortune delivered in a year.”
One Wednesday in February, he cranked out seven. “I’m a bit of a freak,” Lichtenberg said… A story by Lichtenberg sometimes starts with a prompt entered into Perplexity or Google’s NotebookLM, asking it to write something based on a headline he comes up with. He moves the AI tools’ initial drafts into a content-management system and edits the stories before publishing them for Fortune’s readers… A piece from earlier that morning about Josh D’Amaro being named Disney CEO took 10 minutes to get online, he said…

Like other journalists, Lichtenberg vets his stories. He refers back to the original documents to confirm the information he’s reporting is correct. He reaches out to companies for comment. But he admits his process isn’t as thorough as that of magazine fact-checkers.
While Lichtenberg started out saying his stories were co-authored with “Fortune Intelligence”, he now typically signs his own name, according to the article, “because he feels the work is mostly his own.” (Though his stories “sometimes” disclose generative AI was used as a research tool…) The article asks with he could be “a bellwether for where much of the media business is headed…”

“Much of the content people now consume online is generated by artificial intelligence, with some 9% of newly published newspaper articles either partially or fully AI-generated, according to a 2025 study led by the University of Maryland. The number of AI-generated articles on the web surpassed human-written ones in late 2024, according to research and marketing agency Graphite.”
Some executives have made full-throated declarations about the threat posed by AI. New York Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger said AI “is almost certainly going to usher in an unprecedented torrent of crap,” referencing deepfakes as an example. The NewsGuild of New York, the union representing Fortune employees and journalists at other media outlets, said the people are what makes journalism so powerful. “You simply can’t replicate lived experiences, human judgment and expertise,” said president Susan DeCarava.

For Chris Quinn, the editor of local publications Cleveland.com and the Plain Dealer, AI tools have helped tame other torrents facing the industry. AI has allowed the outlets to cover counties in Ohio that otherwise might go ignored by scraping information from local websites and sending “tips” to reporters, he said. It has also edited stories and written first drafts so the newsrooms’ journalists can focus on the calls, research and reporting needed for their stories.... Newsrooms from the New York Times to The Wall Street Journal are deploying AI in various ways to help reporters and editors work more efficiently....

Not all newsrooms disclose their use of AI, and in some cases have rolled out new tools that resulted in errors or PR gaffes. An October study from the European Broadcasting Union and the BBC, which relied on professional journalists to evaluate the news integrity of more than 3,000 AI responses, found that almost half of all AI responses had at least one significant issue.
Last week the New York Times even issued a correction when a freelance book reviewer using an AI tool unknowingly included “language and details similar to those in a review of the same book published in The Guardian.” But it was actually “the second time in a few days that the Times was called out for potential AI plagiarism,” according to the American journalist writing The Handbasket newsletter.
We must stem the idea being pushed by tech companies and their billionaire funders who’ve sunk too much into their products to admit defeat that the infiltration of AI into journalism is inevitable; because from my perch as an independent journalist, it simply is not…

Some AI-loving journalists appear to believe that if they’re clear enough with the AI program they’re using, it will truly understand what they’re seeking and not just do what it’s made to do: steal shit… If you want to work with machines, get a job that requires it. There are a whole lot more of those than there are writing jobs, so free up space for people who actually want to do the work. You’re not doing the world a favor by gifting it your human/AI hybrid. Journalism will not miss you if you leave…
But meanwhile, USA Today recently tried hiring for a new position: AI-Assisted reporter. (The lucky reporter will “support the launch and scaling of AI-assisted local journalism in a major U.S. metro,” working with tools including Copilot and Perplexity, pioneering possible future expansions and “AI-enabled newsroom operations that support and augment human-led journalism.”) And Google is already sponsoring a "publishing innovation award"…

No

By Baloo Uriza • Score: 3 Thread
Not only because headlines that end in a question mark are automatically answered with “no” but also because corrections and retractions are more effort and journalistic integrity than outlets using AI “writers” can manager.

Unlikely to change anything

By Sethra • Score: 3 Thread

“Journalists” have been caught making bold false claims followed by unread retractions for years, now they will blame it on AI just as CEO’s blame AI for job cuts.

Unfortunately the media is rewarded by clicks, not truth.

This is a genuine concern

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 4, Funny Thread
With all the perfect, unbiased journalism going around will AI lower the bar?!

Forget reporters. Support monks.

By SubmergedInTech • Score: 3 Thread

If you want to work with machines, get a job that requires it. There are a whole lot more of those than there are writing jobs, so free up space for people who actually want to do the work.

Do you mean scribes? Because I’m pretty sure all other writing jobs involve working with machines.

Oddly, journalism doesn’t exist to provide jobs to people who wanted to get writing degrees. It exists to report the news.

The loss of classified advertising and the rise of the internet have drastically reduced funding for traditional journalism. The shift from daily newspapers and the evening news to a 24/7 news cycle have also cut the amount of time journalists have to gather and vet information. If you want to take notes with a pad and pencil and have your photographer take their film to a darkroom, you’re simply too inefficient in the 21st century.

The critical missing pieces are editors. In the local paper I subscribe to (San Jose Mercury News), I see obvious grammatical and spelling issues on a daily basis, which implies nobody but the original journalist even read the article before it got published in a print newspaper. And they didn’t bother to use a spell-checker, either. That extends to the reporting, too; studies are misquoted, statistics misused, important facts left out, and assertions unsupported.

That’s before the use of AI to write drafts. So I don’t see how this makes it much worse.

In fact, AI might actually make it better, whether it’s writing the draft so the journalist can take on the role of editor, or taking the role of editor after the journalist writes their own draft. Because clearly none of that is happening right now at my local paper. Doesn’t matter if it’s always right. In fact, it’s probably better if it hallucinates 10% of the time, because that way the journalist can’t rely too heavily on it.

(Yes, in an ideal world, we’d have real human journalists and editors, and enough time for vetting to take place. Are people willing to pay for that? Evidently not.)

No, because…

By tiqui • Score: 3 Thread

The AI editors and AI “fact checkers” will have been coded by the same people (or, eventually, the same stupid AI programming code) and trained on the same data and will therefore not SPOT the errors, not require the retractions, and almost certainly “fact check” the errors as “true”, thereby becoming the obstruction to actual humans correcting things.

AI is likely to produce a new world in which people can believe NOTHING in electronic format, and they need to return to being trustworthy and honest and getting information, and doing transactions, on a handshake with a trusted human, face-to-face.

Congrats to all you people working on stupid large language models and lying to everybody by mis-representing this form of “AI” to the general public as though it were Artificial General Intelligence. You are on the cusp of destroying modernity and forcing society to step backwards 80 years or so. Those of us who worked to bring about the computer revolution INTENDED to build a bright future where computers made everything better, faster, more-efficient, more factual, etc but you are in the process of flushing it all down the giant cosmic toilet. Oh, and before you ask: NO, no additional algorithm can fix this. Algorithms cannot fix human nature, and human nature defaults to abusing every new technology. The current generation of AI is the most-powerful yet least-understood-by-the-public tech to come along. It’s already mis-leading people by the millions - just look at the MOUNTAINS of AI slop ruining the YouTube experience already. It only gets worse from here…

Crooks Behind $27M in ‘Refund’ Scams Busted By YouTube Pranksters After Being Lured to Fake Funeral

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
One crime ring scammed 2,000 elderly people of more than $27 million between 2021 and 2023 using tech support/bank impersonation/refund scams. “Victims were in their 70s and 80s,” reports the U.S. Attorney’s office for California’s southern district. Victims were first told they’d received a refund (either online or via phone), but then told they’d been “over-refunded” a massive amount, and asked to return that amount.

But 42-year-old Jiandong Chen just admitted Thursday in a U.S. federal court that he was involved in the fraud and money laundering via cryptocurrency — pleading guilty to two charges with maximum penalties of 40 years in prison and a $1 million fine, plus 20 years in prison with a maximum fine of $500,000 or twice the amount laundered. “Chen, a Chinese national, is the second defendant charged in a five-defendant indictment.” And what tripped him up seems to be that “Certain members of the conspiracy also did in-person pickups of money directly from victims…”

And so YouTube enters the story — when the scammers called pranksters with 1,790,000 subscribers to their “Trilogy Media” channel. In an elaborate three-hour video, the team of pranksters lured the scammer to a rented Airbnb where they’re staging a fake funeral with a nun. (One of the men acting in the video remembers “we start doing a prayer… I’m holding the scammer’s hand in my nun outfit…”)

They convince the scammer to collect the cash from a dead man — “Is there anything you’d like to say to him?” Then there’s demon voices. The scammer’s victim resurrects from the dead. Did the cash mule bring holy water?

The end result was a video titled "CONFRONTING SCAMMERS WITH A FAKE FUNERAL (EPIC REACTIONS)". But two and a half years later, their “cash mule sting house” video has racked up over 1.3 million views, 22,000 likes, and 2,979 comments. (“This video is longer than Oppenheimer. Thanks for the laughs fellas.”)

And the scammer is facing 60 years in prison.

3+ hour video?

By Yo,dog! • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Oh, come on. The editor of this video interleaved clips from each ploy so you have to watch the whole 3+ hours to see any one ploy in its entirety? No, thanks.

Oh, boy!

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Another YouTube “epic reaction” video! I can’t wait to see how this three-plus-hours-long one differs from the 37 billion other epic reaction videos!

Re:3+ hour video?

By Monoman • Score: 4 Thread

I agree but clicking ahead is not that hard.

The fines are very small.

By jd • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The fines should be proportional to actual damage caused (ie: 100% coverage of any interest on loans, any extra spending the person needed to do in consequence, loss of compound interest, damage to credit rating along with any additional spending this resulted in, and any medical costs that can reasonably be attributed to stress/anxiety). It would be difficult to get an exact figure per person, but a rough estimate of probable actual damage would be sufficient. Add that to the total direct loss - not the money that went through any individual involved, and THEN double that total. This becomes the minimum, not the maximum. You then allow the jury to factor in emotional costs on top of that.

In such cases as this, the statutary upper limit on fines should not apply. SCOTUS has repeatedly ruled that laws and the Constitution can have reasonable exceptions and this would seem to qualify.

If a person has died in the meantime, where the death certificate indicates a cause of death that is medically associated with anxiety or depression, each person invovled should also be charged with manslaughter per such case.

There’s real ‘funeral’ scams too

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 3 Thread
It’s much more difficult to catch the real funeral scammers, because it’s a practice copied by legitimate businesses. They send fake invoices to the person handling your estate. That person doesn’t know which businesses you dealt with, what debts you left unpaid, and probably doesn’t have a lot of experience in tracking-down paperwork. So, the fake invoices are paid.

Apple Brings Device-Level Age Verification to Two More Countries

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
11 days ago Apple launched device-level age restrictions in the U.K. There were some glitches, reports the blog 9to5Mac.
For me, the experience was an entirely painless one, taking less than 30 seconds. All I had to do was tap a confirm and continue button, and Apple told me that the length of time I’d had an Apple account was used to confirm that I’m 18+. Others, however, experienced difficulties with the process timing out or failing to complete. We summarized some of the steps you can take to try to address this. Apple has since listed additional acceptable ways to verify your age. “You can confirm your age with a credit card, or by scanning a driver’s license or one of the following PASS-accredited Proof of Age cards: CitizenCard, My ID Card, TOTUM ID card, or Young Scot National Entitlement Card.”

If you don’t verify your age, then you’ll be treated as a child or teenager, meaning that both the web content filter and communication safety features are switched on.
Apple is continuing the roll-out in Singapore (population 6 million) and South Korea (population 52 million), the article points out, citing a new Apple support document.

South Korea’s law actually requires Apple to re-verify someone’s age annually.

What’s the secret?

By PuddleBoy • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“South Korea’s law actually requires Apple to re-verify someone’s age annually.”

So they’re concerned that, as time passes, a devious person will… grow younger?

I need to get in on this right away!

Fight digital ID

By RegistrationIsDumb83 • Score: 3 Thread
An important thing to note is all of the methods tie you to a real identity. Even account age given over the requisite period, it would be enough time for Apple to do data collection for most people (which may be why some old accounts are not considered eligible) This is a hill I will die on - I will not give the OS my identity. I will sooner stop using cell phones entirely, or switch to a pager+Linux laptop. Not even my carrier has it anymore. After I caught T-Mobile selling my PII again after I opted out, I switched to an MVNO with a pseudonym. Can’t trust any of these corpos with your PII.

Unintedned consiquences

By houstonbofh • Score: 3 Thread
“If you don’t verify your age, then you’ll be treated as a child or teenager, meaning that both the web content filter and communication safety features are switched on.”

How can this go wrong? [roblox]

Chrome 148 Will Start ‘Lazy Loading’ Video and Audio to Improve Performance

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Google has announced that it’s currently testing a new feature for Chrome 148 that could speed up day-to-day browsing,” reports PC World:
[T]he browser can intelligently postpone the loading of certain elements. Why load all images at the start when it can instead load images as you get close to them while scrolling? Chrome and Chromium-based browsers have had built-in lazy loading support for images and iframes since 2019, but this feature would make browsers capable of lazy loading video and audio elements, too. Note, however, that this won’t benefit YouTube video embeds — those are already lazy loadable since they’re embedded using iframes. Actual video and audio elements are rarer but not uncommon. In addition to Chrome, lazy loading of video and audio elements is also expected to be added to other Chromium-based browsers, including Microsoft Edge and Vivaldi.

No auto load/play, period

By markdavis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No video (or animated image) should ever load/autoplay unless the user interacts with that element, indicating he/she wants to play it. Same with audio.

That is how I have Firefox set up. I can’t imagine why anyone would want something different, unless the user wants to whitelist the site (like I do with my video cameras, since I do want those to play automatically).

Re:To speed up browsing

By ddtmm • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Like most here, I’ve been using ad blockers for many years and I’m still amazed at how much faster sites load when you block the additional crap. Depending on the site, sometimes up to 5-10 times faster - mind you, the important stuff does load first. Lazy loading (what a lame term) will be insignificant compared to ad blocking tech.

Absolute Shit

By Puls4r • Score: 3 Thread
So, cntrl-f search is broken because it’s not loaded. I can’t scroll down quickly because it does the constant stop-and-buffer routine.

This is just total ass because people have over-bloated the web. I don’t need 20-50 MB pictures on a little screen. I don’t need all the bloated java bullshit that companies, especially news media companies, are filling their pages with.

This is another symptom of shitty programmers using 100 different pre-made libraries all of which are shitty and bloated to begin with, along with oversize graphics and hundreds of links to third party ad servers all using bandwidth that’s utterly unrelated to the actual content I want to read.

Needs to be optional

By kschendel • Score: 3 Thread

As long as I can turn it off, I don’t give a rat’s ass what stupid, annoying, and bandwidth-eating “features” they put into Chrome.

Scientists Engineered a Plant To Produce 5 Different Psychedelics At Once

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Plants, toads, and mushrooms “can all produce psychedelic substances,” writes ScienceAlert.

“And now their powers have been combined in one plant.”
[S]cientists have taken the genes these organisms use to make five natural psychedelics and introduced them into a tobacco plant ( Nicotiana benthamiana), which then produced all five compounds simultaneously. As interest grows in psychedelics as potential treatments for illnesses such as depression, anxiety, and PTSD, the newly developed system could offer scientists a new way to produce these compounds for research purposes…

[P]rogress in this field remains limited, in part due to regulatory restrictions, underscoring the need for more research. This creates practical challenges for scientists. “Traditionally, the supply of psychedelics relies on natural producers, mainly plants, fungi, and the Sonoran Desert toad,” the researchers write. “Harvesting these organisms for their psychoactive compounds raises ecological and ethical concerns, being increasingly threatened by habitat loss and overexploitation…”

[T]he team carefully monitored the plant’s production of five psychedelic tryptamines: DMT originally from plants; psilocin and psilocybin from mushrooms; and bufotenin and 5-MeO-DMT from toads. The modified tobacco plants were found to produce all five compounds simultaneously.
The article points out that the researchers “also took it a step further.” By tweaking the enzymes they were able to “produce modified versions of the compounds that do not naturally occur in plants, and which may also have therapeutic value.”

Re:Unfortunately this doesnt look like an April fo

By cusco • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I have no idea if people experiment with mushrooms and ayahuasca simultaneously.

As a rule, no, in part because they grow in two entirely different environments, plus ayahuasca doesn’t keep well. I can’t really imagine the cross-effects, but it would be weird. Psilocybin tends to be best when done alone, especially when surrounded by nature. Ayahuasca on the other hand is almost always done in groups, where it can generate hallucinations experienced by the entire group at once (which is weird to even contemplate).

Re:Sounds like a great business opportunity.

By garyisabusyguy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Tomacco

Re:Unfortunately this doesnt look like an April fo

By garyisabusyguy • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’d like to see them produce Tabernanthalog, a synthetic, non-hallucinogenic analogue of ibogaine developed to treat substance use disorders and mental health conditions. It promotes structural neural plasticity (psychoplastogen) without causing the severe cardiac risks or hallucinogenic effects associated with ibogaine.

It will take forever to get through FDA human trials, but make it part of a plant and it’s a “Nutraceutical”

Smoking

By bobbutts • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit smoking.

Re:Why all at once?

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

We don’t make drugs by giving patients some leaves to munch on. The point of the research was to develop a platform for producing any of a wide variety of common psychoactive drugs in a crop plant. They demonstrated its flexibility by producing compounds from three different kingdoms of life. If you were going to do it for real production you could engineer exactly what you wanted into their system. You might well go for more than one compound because you’ve got to purify them anyway so separating two or more is no big deal, and you get multiple pharmaceuticals with each harvest.