Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Astronomers May Have Detected an Atmosphere Around a Tiny, Icy World Past Pluto
  2. OpenAI President Discloses His Stake In the Company Is Worth $30 Billion
  3. White House Considers Vetting AI Models Before They Are Released
  4. OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft Back Bill To Fund ‘AI Literacy’ In Schools
  5. The Pixel 11 Could Be the Next Victim of the RAM Shortage
  6. Expanded AMD HDMI 2.1 Support Is Coming To Linux
  7. The Audio Industry Is Grappling With the Rise of ‘Podslop’
  8. Anthropic Nears $1.5 Billion AI Joint Venture With Wall Street Firms
  9. GameStop Offers to Buy eBay for $56 Billion
  10. Scientists Discover 27 Potential New Planets That Orbit Two Stars
  11. Infrasound Waves Stop Kitchen Fires, But Can They Replace Sprinklers?
  12. 16% of Parents Help Their Children Bypass Online Age Checks, Study Finds. One 15-Year-Old Just Uses a Fake Moustache
  13. Can Investors Trust AI Sales Figures? Asks Wall Street Journal Opinion Piece
  14. Roblox Blames Age-Verification Rollout for Lowered Growth. Stock Tumbles 22%
  15. NetHack 5.0 Released

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Astronomers May Have Detected an Atmosphere Around a Tiny, Icy World Past Pluto

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“The Associated Press is reporting on a new study in Nature Astronomy suggesting that a tiny, icy world beyond Pluto harbors a thin, delicate atmosphere that may have been created by volcanic eruptions or a comet strike,” writes longtime Slashdot reader fahrbot-bot. From the report:
Just 300 miles (500 kilometers) or so across, this mini Pluto is thought to be the solar system’s smallest object yet with a clearly detected global atmosphere bound by gravity, said lead researcher Ko Arimatsu of the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. This so-called minor planet — formally known as (612533) 2002 XV93 — is considered a plutino, circling the sun twice in the time it takes Neptune to complete three solar orbits. At the time of the study, it was more than 3.4 billion miles (5.5 billion kilometers) away, farther than even Pluto, the only other object in the Kuiper Belt with an observed atmosphere. This cosmic iceball’s atmosphere is believed to be 5 million to 10 million times thinner than Earth’s protective atmosphere, according to the the study […].

It’s 50 to 100 times thinner than even Pluto’s tenuous atmosphere. The likeliest atmospheric chemicals are methane, nitrogen or carbon monoxide, any of which could reproduce the observed dimming as the object passed before the star, according to Arimatsu. Further observations, especially by NASA’s Webb Space Telescope, could verify the makeup of the atmosphere, according to Arimatsu.

OpenAI President Discloses His Stake In the Company Is Worth $30 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI president Greg Brockman’s testimony dominated the fifth day of the trial for Elon Musk’s lawsuit against the AI company. Brockman took the witness stand on Monday, disclosing that his stake in OpenAI is worth nearly $30 billion, despite not personally investing money in OpenAI. The judge also declined to admit a pretrial text in which Musk allegedly warned Brockman that he and Altman would become “the most hated men in America.” From a report:
Brockman’s disclosure would put him on the Forbes list of the world’s richest people, with wealth comparable to Melinda French Gates. […] Late Sunday, OpenAI lawyers tried to admit as evidence a text message Musk sent to Brockman two days before the trial began. According to a court filing — which did not include the actual text exchange — Musk sent a message to Brockman to gauge interest in settlement.

When Brockman replied that both sides should drop their respective claims, Musk shot back, according to the filing, “By the end of this week, you and Sam will be the most hated men in America. If you insist, so it will be.” Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who is overseeing the trial, did not admit the text exchange as evidence.
Brockman acknowledged that he had promised to personally donate $100,000 to OpenAI’s charity but never did. In explaining the delay, Brockman put the onus on Altman: “I asked Sam when I should donate this, and he said he would let me know,” reports Business Insider.

The first witness to testify on Monday was Stuart Russell, an artificial intelligence expert who teaches computer science at the University of California, Berkeley. “The most memorable part of Russell’s testimony was when he talked about how much Musk’s legal team paid him,” notes Business Insider. “He received an eye-popping $5,000 per hour for 40 hours of preparatory work. Expert witnesses in high-profile cases typically make between $500 to $1,000 per hour.”

Recap:
Musk Concludes Testimony At OpenAI Trial (Day Four)
Elon Musk Says OpenAI Betrayed Him, Clashes With Company’s Attorney (Day Three)
Musk Testifies OpenAI Was Created As Nonprofit To Counter Google (Day Two)
Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Head To Court (Day One)

Now, this might strike some regulars as harsh,

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

but I would not mind if everyone involved in this case as litigants and their reps dies an unpleasant death.

Won’t solve the basic problem of modern capitalism’s complete subversion of democracy, but it might slow it down a bit.

White House Considers Vetting AI Models Before They Are Released

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Trump administration is reportedly considering an executive order to create a working group that could review advanced AI models before public release. The shift follows concerns over Anthropic’s powerful Mythos model and its cyber capabilities, with officials weighing whether the government should get early access to frontier models without necessarily blocking their release. The New York Times reports:
In meetings last week, White House officials told executives from Anthropic, Google and OpenAI about some of those plans, people briefed on the conversations said. The working group is likely to consider a number of oversight approaches, officials said. But a review process could be similar to one being developed in Britain, which has assigned several government bodies to ensure that A.I. models meet certain safety standards, people in the tech industry and the administration said.

The discussions signal a stark reversal in the Trump administration’s approach to A.I. Since returning to office last year, Mr. Trump has been a major booster of the technology, which he has said is vital to winning the geopolitical contest against China. Among other moves, he swiftly rolled back a Biden administration regulatory process that asked A.I. developers to perform safety evaluations and report on A.I. models with potential military applications. “We’re going to make this industry absolutely the top, because right now it’s a beautiful baby that’s born,” Mr. Trump said of A.I. at an event in July. “We have to grow that baby and let that baby thrive. We can’t stop it. We can’t stop it with politics. We can’t stop it with foolish rules and even stupid rules.” Mr. Trump left room for some rules, but he added that “they have to be more brilliant than even the technology itself.”

The White House wants to avoid any political repercussions if a devastating A.I.-enabled cyberattack were to occur, people in the tech industry and the administration said. The administration is also evaluating whether new A.I. models could yield cyber-capabilities that could be useful to the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies, they said. To get ahead of models like Mythos, some officials are pushing for a review system that would give the government first access to A.I. models, but that would not block their release, people briefed on the talks said.

A rigorous test plan, no doubt…

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Let me guess; because vetting its effect on security is hard and not terribly exciting they’ll mostly test for ‘woke’ and then decide on that basis.

The expertise

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
to “vet” these models is all in the White House. I’m sure of that.

Set the precedent

By backslashdot • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

When the Democrats come in, they’ll vet the AI models properly.

Re:On what authority?

By dfghjk • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Apparently the same authority that allows ICE to murder citizens in the streets.

Also, what does it mean to “release a model”? Is ChatGPT a model? No, it is not. If making a model available becomes a problem, then keep the model private and only release tools that use it.

And how is a model dangerous? It’s the tool that uses it that might be. How does the government know what any cloud services does behind the scenes.

It’s all complete bullshit from the most incompetent administration ever.

“small” government

By zeiche • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

is this the small government that the “conservatives” keep banging on about?

what, exactly, is small about white-house review of products offered to the public?

please, MAGAts, clue me in.

OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft Back Bill To Fund ‘AI Literacy’ In Schools

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
A new, bipartisan bill introduced (PDF) by Democratic Senator of California Adam Schiff and endorsed by the biggest AI developers in the world — including OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft — would change the K-12 curriculum to shoehorn in “AI literacy,” something that young people and teachers alike already hate in schools. The Literacy in Future Technologies Artificial Intelligence, or LIFT AI Act, would empower the new director of the National Science Foundation (NSF) to make grant awards “on a merit-reviewed, competitive basis to institutions of higher education or nonprofit organizations (or a consortium thereof) to support research activities to develop educational curricula, instructional material, teacher professional development, and evaluation methods for AI literacy at the K-12 level,” the bill says.

It defines AI literacy as using AI; specifically, “having the age-appropriate knowledge and ability to use artificial intelligence effectively, to critically interpret outputs, to solve problems in an AI-enabled world, and to mitigate potential risks.” The bill is endorsed by the American Federation of Teachers, Google, OpenAI, Information Technology Industry Council, Software & Information Industry Association, Microsoft, and HP Inc. […] The grant would support “AI literacy evaluation tools and resources for educators assessing proficiency in AI literacy,” according to the bill. It would also fund “professional development courses and experiences in AI literacy,” and the development of “hands-on learning tools to assist in developing and improving AI literacy.” Most importantly for real-world implications, it would fund changing the existing curriculum “to incorporate AI literacy where appropriate, including responsible use of AI in learning.”

Use our products!

By locater16 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
“Indoctrinate, indoctrinate, indoctrinate!” - Tech Company CEO’s

Start with regular literacy, eh?

By MIPSPro • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
21% of US adults are illiterate. 56% read below a 6th grade level. 2/3 of 4th/8th graders not proficient in reading; recent declines post-2019/2022. We don’t need smartphones and AI in schools at all. What they need is to go back to chalkboards, physical textbooks, and homework. The only thing that needs tweaking is to add AI detection and resistance to their assignments (ie.. do more in class, in person). Schools that do this get consistently better results than the ones that focus on technology.

Just great

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

… Fund ‘AI Literacy’ In Schools.

“Learn to Code” becomes “Learn to Prompt” /s

Re:Use our products!

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
It beats the hell out of teaching critical thinking.

You don’t want your kid coming home changing deeply held religious or political beliefs right?

This is why it’s important that parents can pull their kids out of any class they object to. This way flat earther children don’t have to be subjected to non-Zetetic Astronomy…

Fuck the techbros

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 3 Thread
First, we need history, English, math, and critical thinking skills literacy before AI claptrap.

The Pixel 11 Could Be the Next Victim of the RAM Shortage

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google’s Pixel 11 lineup could see RAM cuts or lower starting configurations because of the global memory shortage, with leaks suggesting the base model may drop from 12GB to 8GB while Pro models could add 12GB versions below the current 16GB tier. The Verge reports:
There will be 16GB configurations available for each, but adding a lower-spec model could mean the 16GB version is getting a price hike. However, the silver lining is that the specs from MysticLeaks also include camera upgrades and brighter displays for the Pro models. The RAM shortage is pushing other phone makers, including Samsung, to raise prices, too.

How much RAM?

By Shakes Fist • Score: 3 Thread
What the hell are people running that needs 16GB RAM? Win11??

Hey, Google! Here’s an alternate idea

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3 Thread

I know it would be against your business model, but how about reinstating support for your older phones so people can keep the ones they have longer? My Pixel 5a still works great. And while it doesn’t get OS/Security updates anymore, I’m planning to keep it as long as it’s working and supported on my network (Ting/T-Mobile) and the Play Store - like I did with my my previous phone, a Kyocera HydroVibe (2015 to 2021).

On the bright side

By turb • Score: 3 Thread

Pressure to reduce RAM in a device due to cost could drive engineering to make phones be more efficient and utilize LESS RAM. Linux/Android does NOT need to be a pig. It’s a pig because device vendors/OS engineers/app makers get lazy.

Sadly running AI native on your phone could as a result be less than useful but that’s a good thing isn’t it?

Re:Hey, Google! Here’s an alternate idea

By rta • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

no no… please buy a new pixel 9/10/11.

it takes slightly better pictures and it only weighs 50% more than your current one. oh did we mention it gets a full day of battery… yeah, apparently that’s notable again as it was 15 years ago.

the in-screen fingerprint sensor kinda sucks, but don’t worry, you’ll eventually forget the rear sensor was flawless for years.

Re: On the bright side

By sodul • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

My first computer had 64kB, second one 512kB, and that was what we now call ‘unified memory’, shared between the cpu and the video encoding chip (no gpu back then). These machines did not have virtual memory either to overflow to disk. I had to be very mindful of memory usage when writing code or we would simply crash by running out of memory, no forgiveness.

I’ve worked in Silicon Valley for my entire career and I was surprised at how little attention most ‘software engineers’ paid to ram and cpu optimization. You would expect that from scripters, folks that write Bash or Python code, but I saw that a lot with Java developers as well. It was especially bad when the devs could ask the OPS team for a machine with more RAM as their first instinct rather than consider any optimizations, after all it would come from some other team budget, and that same OPS team would get blamed for going over budget, not the Devs.

So yeah in a way, a good RAM shortage for a while might help bring back some discipline. Unfortunately the vast majority of AI training is done on code that does not care about optimizing RAM consumption.

It is not just RAM consumption, but storage as well. My son got a second hand Nintendo Switch OLED yesterday, the prior owner had 2 games installed leaving 6GB out of the 64GB free. One game was downloaded, the other one still required the cartridge and used 26GB of storage. That’s rather insane.

Meanwhile you can get a generic retro gaming device for $50 with thousands of classic games on a 64 GB SDCard. I’m pretty sure a lot of that space could be better optimized, but there is little incentive for that these days.

Expanded AMD HDMI 2.1 Support Is Coming To Linux

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
AMD is preparing expanded HDMI 2.1 support for Linux, following earlier delays after the HDMI Forum rejected an open source implementation of HDMI 2.1 as proprietary technology. As GamingOnLinux reports, AMD developer Harry Wentland submitted a patch series to the Linux kernel mailing list, noting that it brings “HDMI FRL support to the amdgpu display driver” and that “DSC is still being tested and will be sent out later.”

A forum post on Phoronix from an AMD driver developer also said “a full implementation will ultimately be available once the patches are ready and have completed compliance testing.”

Proprietary irony.

By MachineShedFred • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Anyone else getting a chuckle out of the HDMI Consortium, the current ruling kings of proprietary technology and implementations now that the MPEG LA tripped over their own genitals and made themselves redundant, rejecting open source implementations as “proprietary technology”?

Fuck HDMI. I still don’t know why people are using that shitty port when DisplayPort is royalty-free, has better specs, is supported by everyone, and can be used over other cables that don’t have all the licensing attachment (USB-C for example).

Re:Proprietary irony.

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I still don’t know why people are using that shitty port when DisplayPort is royalty-free, has better specs, is supported by everyone, and can be used over other cables that don’t have all the licensing attachment (USB-C for example).

HDMI is the new VGA. It allows the use of TVs, older monitors, etc. I have an ancient 1080p monitor plugged into a PC as a secondary display. The overhead projector used for presentations is often HDMI.

Re:Proprietary irony.

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I still don’t know why people are using that shitty port when DisplayPort is royalty-free, has better specs, is supported by everyone

Not only is there plenty of hardware out there without DisplayPort, but if you at all want to connect to a TV your choice is either HDMI or go pound sand. Dp is supported by precisely 0% of the AV industry. As for why the AV industry uses it, it’s because it has features specific to the AV industry that DP lack, such as an Audio Return Channel which is critical if using an audio system that relies on input switching. It also has CEC baked in to the standard, and has longer cable runs without resorting to active amplification or conversion.

and can be used over other cables that don’t have all the licensing attachment (USB-C for example).

The ability to USB-C for Displayport relies on the implementation of DP Alternative Mode on the USB host which not all devices have and is really only common on mobile devices. This isn’t some magic solution. Interestingly HDMI Alternative Mode was something that existed for a solid 7 years before vendors gave up because no one used it. But more relevant: There simply isn’t a need to support USB alt mode directly when HDMI can piggyback off the Dp signal with an active adapter, especially when the active circuitry is small enough to fit in the HDMI connector. (Yes I connect my laptop to TVs via USB-C, it’s a normal thing you can do through the same port which supports dp).

Re:Proprietary irony.

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

HDMI is the new VGA.

No not really. HDMI is still very much the active and dominant standard in the entire AV industry. It just isn’t in the computer monitor industry. Saying it’s VGA implies it’s some kind of legacy tech, but the reality is right now in 2026 if you go to your local Wallmart and buy the latest fancy TV you’ll find 100% of them use HDMI not as a legacy connector, but as the current latest hot tech.

Re:Proprietary irony.

By jsonn • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The only reason the AV industry prefers HDMI is the DRM bit. Everything else is a gimmick.

The Audio Industry Is Grappling With the Rise of ‘Podslop’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg’s Ashley Carman:
Welcome to the modern era of podcasting in which thousands of new shows are released into the world every day with a sizable portion likely being AI-generated. Figuring out exactly which ones fall into that growing category is becoming more difficult just as the industry is starting to take this issue seriously. In only the past month or so, Amazon launched a feature that explains a product by generating a quasi-podcast, complete with co-hosts talking to each other and taking questions from users. Shout out to Business Insider reporter Katie Notopoulos for spotting this (and, naturally, demoing it with an adult diaper rash-cream). Not long ago, Nicholas Thompson, chief executive officer of the Atlantic, noted “podslop” dominated his Spotify search results when he typed in the word “Sora.” This was around the time that OpenAI shut down its user-generated, AI-content-only app.

[…] All of which raises some big, difficult questions. For one, what should the listening platforms do about this incursion? As of right now, Apple Podcasts requires creators who generated a “material portion” of their show using AI to disclose it. The platform also bans misleading or deceptive content. Spotify hasn’t published any specific guidelines around AI, though it maintains general rules around dangerous and misleading content. Where this conversation gets even trickier is when it comes to money. Many of these podcasts are hosted on at least one free service that allows programs to opt into their ad marketplace with zero barrier to entry, meaning these shows (and the hosting service) profit off every listen or download. Spreaker, a company owned by iHeartMedia, is the primary one to watch here. Though it tells users to disclose when they rely on AI, it still allows those shows to opt into its programmatic ad marketplace, which pays creators 60% of the revenue generated by the ads placed in their shows. It stands to reason that most of these thousands of shows don’t reach many people. But in the aggregate, the ears and dollars could add up. Are the advertisers on board with being next to AI-generated content, some of which might be deemed “slop?”
There’s also the question of how to define “slop.” Jackson of the Podcast Index and his co-host Adam Curry treat it as something listeners simply know when they hear it, while Alberto Betella, co-founder of RSS.com, defines it as “fully automated content with no human review.”
Jeanine Wright, co-founder of Inception Point, rejects the debate altogether: “The people still talking about slop are still making 6-7 jokes,” she said. “It’s still yesterday’s conversation.”

The answer is simple

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

All AI content should be accurately labeled as AI and credit given to the model used

You’re Right, It Looks Like I’ve Murdered You!

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Just last week I listened to a true-crime podcast where they described how a murderer tortured their victim by asking them how many r’s in “strawberry”, and cutting off a finger for each incorrect answer. Eventually they cut off all fourteen!

YouTube Too

By XopherMV • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The same thing is occurring in YouTube too. Someone posts a video with a clickbait title. It’s an AI voice reading an AI script showing video that’s only tangentially related to the script. Overall, the video isn’t outright bad. But, it’s not particularly good either. They’re just poor quality. They all just seem to ramble on for a pre-determined amount of time and then stop.

The problem is that the shear number of these videos and channels is unreal. Someone’s automated the creation of these channels and videos. This someone is pumping out these videos faster than you can block whole channels.

Further, it’s impossible to tell which channel has human-generated content and which is all-AI. YouTube doesn’t help at all since Google is promoting the usage of AI. So, the service is getting flooded with poor-quality AI content. As a YouTube user, you either deal with this AI enshittification or you stop using YouTube.

Industrialized Content Subsumes Industries

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Industrializing content creation was bound to eventually come up with a way to industrialize their own industry. Creators annoyed the business side of the content creation business and always have. Whether it be music and real musicians, books and real authors, videos and real videographers (and writers, and lighting experts and all the rest), or audio form news / stories and all the producers required to make them well, including the researchers helping gather the information behind the scenes, all the humans involved have always been seen as a cost center, and an obstacle to pure, unfiltered profit possibilities. Now that AI is good enough to generate slop in all of these realms, the industrialized version of all of these realms are of course obsessing over how quickly they can rid themselves of the human involvement in creating any of these forms of content.

This obsession has led very quickly to creating so much automated content that it’s beginning to swamp traditional content creators, who simply will not be able to keep up with the automated creation.

And perhaps in the end, the “industrial” part of the content creation industries will falter and fail under the flood of slop that they are creating. And maybe we can get back to a point where the content itself becomes important again, rather than the quantity of slop that can be generated for clicks. At least, that’s what the tiny little hopeful part of my brain is wishing for. More likely, we’ll just watch traditional and even modern distribution methods for content choke on the tsunami of slop until there’s no distribution methods left, and we’ll be back to passing things around on tapes, cds, or notebooks.

Slop =

By Bahbus • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Low quality + low effort. It doesn’t matter if it was created by AI or humans.

Anthropic Nears $1.5 Billion AI Joint Venture With Wall Street Firms

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic is reportedly nearing a roughly $1.5 billion joint venture with Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, Hellman & Friedman, and other Wall Street firms to sell AI tools to private-equity-backed companies. “The investors aim to create a company that acts as a consulting arm for Anthropic and helps teach businesses — including the private-equity firms’ portfolio companies — how to incorporate AI across their operations,” reports the Wall Street Journal. Anthropic, Blackstone, and Hellman & Friedman would each invest about $300 million, while Goldman would contribute around $150 million.

Interesting

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It might be that getting “Trumped” has caused Anthropic to turn away from government work and look for other business. Becoming the go-to AI company for Wall Street would hardly be a consolation prize. It’s probably an even bigger market than defense.

GameStop Offers to Buy eBay for $56 Billion

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
GameStop has made an unsolicited $56 billion cash-and-stock offer to buy eBay (paywalled; alternative source), with CEO Ryan Cohen arguing he can turn the marketplace into a far larger Amazon competitor. “EBay should be worth — and will be worth — a lot more money,” Cohen said in an interview. “I’m thinking about turning eBay into something worth hundreds of billions of dollars.” The Wall Street Journal reports:
Cohen said GameStop has a commitment letter from TD Bank to provide up to $20 billion in debt financing to help make a deal possible. GameStop delivered an offer letter to eBay on Sunday and released a copy of it following the Journal’s report on the details of the bid. Cohen wrote in the letter to eBay Chairman Paul Pressler that GameStop started building its eBay position on Feb. 4. It said its offer consists of 50% cash and 50% GameStop shares.

EBay said Monday morning its board and financial advisers would review GameStop’s unsolicited proposal. It said there were no discussions with or outreach from GameStop before receiving the offer. Ebay added that it will review the offer “with a focus on the value to be delivered to eBay shareholders, including the value of the GameStop stock consideration and the ability of GameStop to deliver a binding, actionable proposal.”

If eBay isn’t receptive, Cohen said he was prepared to run a proxy fight and take the offer directly to its shareholders. The window for shareholders to nominate director candidates at eBay ahead of an annual meeting scheduled for this June has already closed, according to the company’s proxy materials. Cohen told the Journal that putting his videogame retailer and eBay under one roof could create opportunities to cut costs and improve earnings. The two companies have some overlap already, including a focus on selling collectibles such as trading cards. “There is nobody who is more qualified, based on my experience, to run the eBay business,” Cohen said, referencing his time at GameStop and previously Chewy, the online pet-products marketplace he co-founded.

Re:Where the other $36bn come from?

By shanen • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Has to be some kind of leveraged buyout where the insane valuation of the company they are buying based on the insane valuation of their own company is supposed to produce magic value and a more insane combined valuation from which they will “easily” pay off all the borrowed money that lubricated the rest of the deal. Usually has some vulture elements of splitting up and selling pieces that have insane projections of future sales.

Too bad such insanity isn’t illegal.

My solution delusion would be pro-freedom anti-greedom taxation where such deals would basically become poisonous. The merger would result in higher taxes on the profits for the monopoly-building aspects, thus lowering the precious retaining earnings after taxes. Create a natural path to higher retained earnings by spawning competing child companies… “Can’t get there from here.”

But…

By LordHighExecutioner • Score: 5, Funny Thread
…is the offer on Ebay ?!?

Re:Here we go again

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is like when K-Mart (which was failing) bought Sears (which was not failing) and then they both went down.

There is some logic to this

By blastard • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Gamestop made a business model of taking used products and selling them on. Unlike the storefronts that tried to make a living by helping people sell on eBay, Gamestop already has those locations in place, with a compatible business. Adding grading and verification, and maybe even packaging and shipping makes sense. How many more people would sell their unwanted items if all they had to do was drop them off and someone else handles the listing, selling, packaging and shipping.

Re:Where the other $36bn come from?

By misnohmer • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
How are they going to more than double their own market cap by just issuing new stock? Why not issue a lot more stock and buy Apple, Google, Microsoft, and few other companies while at it? They could offer 10 trillion each in Game Stock, since they can issue any amount of stock they want, right?

Scientists Discover 27 Potential New Planets That Orbit Two Stars

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Astronomers have identified 27 potential new circumbinary planets — worlds that orbit two stars, like Star Wars’ Tatooine. “To date, only about 18 circumbinary planets … had been identified in the universe,” reports the Guardian. “More than 6,000 planets have been discovered that orbit single stars, like Earth does around the sun.” The Guardian reports:
In a timely publication for May 4, also known as Star Wars Day, scientists have identified nearly 30 more candidate planets, whose distances range from 650 to 18,000 light years away from Earth. […] More than half of the stars in the universe exist in binary or multiple star systems. The researchers instead used a method known as “apsidal precession,” searching for a wobble between stars that orbit around and eclipse each other.

“If we monitor the exact timing of these eclipses … that can tell us that there’s something else going on in the system,” said Margo Thornton, the study’s lead author and a PhD candidate at UNSW. After eliminating other factors such as the rotation and gravitational pull of the two stars, the team identified 36 star systems out of 1,590 whose behavior could only be explained by a third body. For “27 of those objects, it is possible that they are planet mass,” Thornton said.

More research into their spectra — the light they emit — was needed to formally confirm them as circumbinary planets, she said. “It’s just a matter of: what is the mass of it? Is it a planet? Is it a brown dwarf? Is it a star?” The team discovered the potential planets — which likely range from Neptune-sized to ten times heavier than Jupiter — using data from Nasa’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, a planet-hunting space telescope that launched in 2018.
The research was published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Re:About time…

By HiThere • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

There are lots of “special case” solutions to the three body problem. The general case, however, still is unsolved.

Infrasound Waves Stop Kitchen Fires, But Can They Replace Sprinklers?

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
In a makeshift demonstration kitchen in Concord, California, cooking oil splatters in and around a frying pan, which catches fire on an unattended gas stove. Within moments, a smoke detector wails. But in this demonstration, something less common happens: An AI-driven sensor activates and wall emitters blast infrasound waves toward the source of the fire in an attempt to put it out. The science of acoustic fire suppression, which has long been known and documented in scientific literature and the press, works by vibrating oxygen molecules away from a fuel source, depriving the fire of a critical component needed for combustion. Indeed, after just a few seconds of infrasound, the tiny kitchen blaze goes out.

“We were able to not just point-and-shoot like a fire extinguisher; we figured out how to run it through ducting and distribute it like a sprinkler system,” said Geoff Bruder, co-founder and CEO of Sonic Fire Tech, during the presentation. The company’s goal is to replace sprinklers, which are effective at stopping fires but can also do significant water damage to a property. Sonic Fire Tech appears to be the first company trying to commercialize the science of acoustic fire suppression. Its executives have already been touring Southern California; Wednesday’s event was the first in the northern half of the state.

The company aims to make this infrasound technique mainstream in both commercial (for instance, a data center, where sprinklers would damage electronics) and in-home installations, given that sprinklers are already required in all new California homes built in 2011 and later. Sonic Fire Tech also hopes to produce a backpack-based system that could be worn by wildland firefighters headed out into the field. “We are making meaningful technological improvements on a monthly basis,” Stefan Pollack, a company spokesperson, emailed Ars after the event. But two experts who spoke with Ars raised serious questions about the potential for this technology to supplant traditional sprinklers in a home. They are even more skeptical as to whether the technique can be effective in an uncontrolled wildfire situation, where flames can grow very quickly.
Experts are concerned that infrasound may knock down small flames but does not cool hot surfaces or wet fuel like sprinklers do, which raises the risk of re-ignition, smoldering fires, hidden fires, or blocked fires. Sonic Fire Tech has claimed third-party validation and possible NFPA 13D equivalency, but it has not publicly released full testing details.
Fire officials and outside observers also want more information about reliability, maintenance, calibration, and how system failures would be detected and communicated.

Re:old man yells

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Funny Thread
He’s yelling because the last fire suppression damaged his hearing.

(CALL FOR PRICING)

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 3 Thread

How expensive are the, uh, speakers for this?

Even after three decades, I am constantly amazed at how every company has a website but none of them has prices on it.

What can’t infrasound do!?

By EvilSS • Score: 5, Funny Thread
What can’t infrasound do!? Oh, I know: prevent dupes.

EDITORS: Wrong link

By SomePoorSchmuck • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The link in the title banner goes to a reuters story about whales.

Must be an IPO coming soon

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

We’re sure seeing what’s essentially the same story reposted on Slashdot enough times… I can’t think of any reason that would be other than someone’s invested in the company and they’re hoping to get rich off an IPO in a few months.

16% of Parents Help Their Children Bypass Online Age Checks, Study Finds. One 15-Year-Old Just Uses a Fake Moustache

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Independent reports that “more than a third of children in the UK have found a way around age verification measures" for social media sites and other online platforms. And new research from online safety organisation Internet Matters “suggests one in six parents have helped their child to get past age verification checks, with children reporting ‘tricking’ platforms into thinking they are older. "
Parents also said they had caught their children drawing on facial hair in a bid to evade the technology. One mother said: “I did catch my son using an eyebrow pencil to draw a moustache on his face, and it verified him as 15 years old”… From a sample of 1,000 UK children, 46% said they believed age checks are easy to bypass, while 32% admitted to having done so.
49% of the children surveyed said they’d still encountered harmful content, according to the online safety activists. The group called the figure “unacceptable,” and complained that age verification measures “are often ineffective in practice or easy to bypass.”

Re:They do not care

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

there are two groups behind this: the government security people who just want the infrastructure in place for future crackdowns, and the neo-puritans who actually want all “objectionable” content gone forever and the people behind it stoned to death.

but yeah, neither group is ever going to be upfront about their goals

Can’t help but wonder …

By Green Mountain Bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
If the parent is fine with the kid accessing these materials, is this actually a problem?

Re:Of course

By ranton • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Agreed completely. If a parent helps the kid register, there shouldn’t be any problem here. Working as intended as far as I’m concerned.

Re:Can’t help but wonder …

By taustin • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Are you implying that parents are more qualified to determine what’s best for their children than the government? Keep talking like that, and you’ll end up in a reeducation camp.

Re:Of course

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m saying if the party of family values really wanted to do as they claim they wouldn’t be taking away things that actually help children.

Perfect example. https://www.edweek.org/policy-…

Can Investors Trust AI Sales Figures? Asks Wall Street Journal Opinion Piece

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A Wall Street Journal opinion piece warns of “a troubling trend” in AI’s growth. “Rather than selling software, some AI companies are paying their partners to use it.”

It cites OpenAI’s $1.5 billion joint venture with private-equity firms, Anthropic’s $200 million contribution to a private-equity firm joint venture, and Google’s $750 million subsidization of Gemini’s adoption by consulting firms. “These agreements muddy the distinction between a company’s sound growth trajectory and artificial financial engineering.”
[T]he scale and structure of the recent AI deals go beyond standard incentive mechanisms… When a seller pays customers to buy its products, it is unclear if its revenue growth reflects vibrant demand or a willingness to accept subsidies.
Slashdot reader destinyland writes:
This warning comes from a prominent figure in the investing community. For six years Robert Pozen was chairman of America’s oldest mutual fund company, after five years at Fidelity. An advocate for corporate governance, he’s currently a lecturer at MIT’s business school (and the author of the book Remote Inc.: How to Thrive at Work…Wherever You Are). “As AI companies prepare initial public offerings, investors should scrutinize their numbers closely,” Pozner writes, warning about “time-limited financial support”.
“In evaluating AI sales figures, analysts should consider the distorted incentives that the recent financing deals create,” writes Pozner:
Private-equity firms, enticed by promised returns, might demand rapid rollouts of AI products, rather than ensuring their orderly and safe development. Portfolio companies of private-equity firms may embrace AI tools not because they are needed but because adoption is mandated by their owners. Consultants may favor one set of AI models based on the subsidy instead of the merits.

If guarantees and subsidies are major factors in the rapid adoption of AI tools, investors should be skeptical of AI companies’ revenue projections. Many of their customers enticed by consultants will stop paying full price when the financial incentives are gone. Many of the portfolio companies of private-equity firms could back away from selected AI tools once these joint ventures expire. The challenge with evaluating these AI financing deals is the lack of transparency. At present, AI vendors don’t separate revenue driven by subsidies or joint ventures from standard sales.

The lesson from the telecom debacle is that financial engineering can obscure, for years, the difference between real customer demand and demand driven by incentives. When AI companies begin to finance their own product distribution, guaranteeing returns to investors and subsidizing sales, it’s a signal for investors to dig deeper.
Investing in an AI company? Ask what percentage of enterprise revenue is coming from subsidized channels or joint ventures, Pozner suggests. And the renewal/retention rate for customers not supported by subsidies or joint ventures…

Re:Who cares?

By dfghjk • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Then who will it impact, and if no one, how is it a bubble?

Betteridge’s Law of Headlines

By BeaverCleaver • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Can Investors Trust AI Sales Figures?

Betteridge’s Law states that if the headline is a question, the answer is probably “No.”

I don’t think the sales matter

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Billionaires want AI because they are tired of being dependent on consumers and employees. They don’t care how much it costs and they don’t care about profits anymore.

The Epstein class wants to fundamentally break capitalism. No more markets no more competition no more regulation no more paying wages no more arguing with unions or employees none of that. Just them in charge of everything deciding who gets what. Techno feudalism.

So AI companies can lose as much money as they want. Because billionaires have infinite money cuz we gave it to them and we are too much of a bunch of pussies to take it back.

Reminds me the old days of Windows

By SouthSeb • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Some of you may not be aware of this story, but through the 80s–00s, Microsoft famously didn’t enforce anti-piracy laws in poorer countries.

The reason is that it was better for them to lose some money, but to have Windows widely distributed and become the de facto standard for operating systems worldwide. After that, they could finally enforce it and profit.

I would bet that the big AI companies are basically following the same model.

Re:Who cares?

By drinkypoo • Score: 4 Thread

Then who will it impact, and if no one, how is it a bubble?

It will directly impact investors. This will have the usual indirect effects on/due to the people who had no business investing.

Roblox Blames Age-Verification Rollout for Lowered Growth. Stock Tumbles 22%

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Age verification became mandatory for chat access on Roblox in January — and Friday morning Quartz reported it’s apparently impacted the company’s financials:
Roblox cut its full-year 2026 bookings forecast by roughly $900 million at the midpoint on Thursday, blaming stronger-than-expected headwinds from its mandatory age-verification rollout on an audience that skews heavily toward children and teenagers. Full-year 2026 bookings are now projected at $7.33 billion to $7.60 billion, a range that sits roughly $900 million below the prior guidance of $8.28 billion to $8.55 billion; analysts had expected $8.38 billion, according to Yahoo Finance. Roblox stock fell almost 22% in premarket trading....

Daily active users rose 35% year over year to 132 million, while hours engaged climbed 43% to 31 billion hours… Daily Active Users and hours engaged fell below forecasts of 143.8 million and 33.68 billion, respectively, according to Yahoo Finance… Users who have not completed age checks have faced restricted communication features, and the process has weighed on the platform’s ability to bring in new users. Russia’s blocking of the platform, which took effect in December 2025, added further drag on user growth, according to Yahoo Finance. As of the end of the first quarter, 51% of global daily active users had completed age verification, with 65% of U.S. users having done so, Roblox said....

The safety push has come with legal costs. Roblox accrued $57 million in the first quarter for settlements and settlement proposals with certain states over youth-related consumer protection and digital safety matters, with payments structured over multiple years, the company said.
Roblox acknowledged in a letter to shareholders that “our aggressive push to enhance safety lowers our expectations for topline growth in 2026.” But they argued that it also “makes our platform fundamentally better and amplifies the long-term growth potential of Roblox through more effective content targeting, tailored communication experiences, and improved community sentiment.”

Oh the horror!

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

A scam outfit won’t be able to pray on teh childrenz.

The consequences will never be the same!!!

Now do the same to tiktok and the zuck outfit.

In other news

By radoni • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Plantation owners blame the end of slavery for a downturn in projected profits

Darkness, hates the light.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Age verification forces the maker of a children’s game to reconcile and face their real problem of child grooming head on, and their stock market excuse is to blame the law?

Let me not feel bad one bit because investors were forced to realize exactly where those profits were coming from.

Re: Still a child labor mine

By SirSlud • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Your metaphor would make a lot more sense if kids were designing Lego sets that Lego then sold and vastly under compensated the creators of those sets (while doing a piss poor job of keeping those kids from being contacted directly by adults)

Re: In other news

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Have they tried pulling themselves up by their bootstraps?

NetHack 5.0 Released

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
“So yesterday the Devteam (it is always the Devteam) released version 5.0 of legendary and venerable rogueike compuer game NetHack,” writes the Rogue-like games column @Play. “It is 39 years old…"

MilenCent (Slashdot reader #219,397) writes:
In addition to play changes it’s left for players to discover, this version updates the code to compile with C99, makes it much easier to cross compile the code for other systems than the one running, and now uses Lua for its dungeon generation. Happy hacking!
For new players, “Nethack 5.0 now has an optional tutorial in the early phases of the game that might help you,” notes the Rogue-like games column @Play:
Three systems binaries are provided: Windows, MS-DOS and Amiga. Yes, Nethack still supports MS-DOS, and yes, it still supports classic Amiga: it explicitly supports AmigaDOS 3.0, meaning it can still run on 68000 machines… That these are the only systems they provide binaries for shouldn’t be seen as an indication that these are the “most important” platforms for Nethack, it’s more that, since it’s entirely open source, building it yourself is entirely possible, and more expected than with most software. Nethack can be built for Linux, Windows 8-11, AmigaDOS, MacOS (I’m not sure if this includes classic Mac too but it might), Windows CE (wow), OS/2 (additional wow), BeOS, VMS and multiple Unixes… Another option is to play through public Nethack servers. The most popular of these are probably alt.org and Hardfought.

Re:Version

By Quietust • Score: 5, Informative Thread

NetHack has many variants and forks, and one of them was named NetHack 4 (and was based on version 3.4.3) - naming this release 4.0.0 would’ve been rather confusing.

On top of that, there had been numerous development builds named “3.7.0”, so releasing the final version with that same number would’ve also been confusing, so they went with 5.0.0 instead.

Re:modernized to C99, then unmodernized to using L

By MilenCent • Score: 5, Informative Thread

(Disclaimer: submitter of the post, and also the person who’s blog was linked to it, although that was added by the editor and not me.)

I would take the bet that *zero percent* of Nethack is vibe coded. The Devteam are not the kinds of people, I believe, to be easily swayed by (spits) _passing fancies_ like Claude. Lua (I’ve been told) can be compiled as straight C, so it doesn’t introduce further dependencies. The previous special level building system of Nethack used yacc and lex, and was rather complex. I’m sad that these classic Unix tools are no longer part of the build process, but using Lua may make it easier to expand Nethack in the future.

Fun fact: Lua was part of Angband’s code for a brief time.

Re:I only just updated to 3.7.0-132 a while back

By MilenCent • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Some of those things that I’ve found:

* A tutorial is offered on starting a game
* There can be themed rooms now, including (seen with my own eyes) non-rectangular ones, icy rooms, nested rooms and statue gardens (where the statues can actually be monsters).
* Iron bars can now be normal dungeon dressing. Before, they had only been seen in very few instances in Quest levels.
* Monkeys in minetown can now try to steal items from you (those may have been in a previous version)
* player monster corpses can generate on traps

I’ve also heard that the mid-game Gehennom area (aka Hell) is much less monotonous now, with all kinds of special terrain. I’d say it’s mostly an incremental release, no major game systems have been added, but I guess the game’s pretty set in stone now. I do miss the days when Nethack 3.0 greatly reworked the game, and Nethack 3.1 its dungeon, but then there’s lots of room for new classic-style roguelikes to fill in those blanks.

Re: modernized to C99, then unmodernized to using

By ljw1004 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Lua remains the commonest choice today for games to offer scripting/modding. It’s pretty much the industry standard. (Outside C# for Unity).

Come on

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The MS-DOS download is 2.5MB, and NETHACK.EXE is over 3 MB uncompressed! How am I supposed to fit that on a floppy disk?!