Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Microsoft Deletes Blog Telling Users To Train AI on Pirated Harry Potter Books
  2. OpenAI Has No Moat, No Tech Edge, No Lock-in and No Real Plan, Analyst Warns
  3. Several Meta Employees Have Started Calling Themselves ‘AI Builders’
  4. AMC Theatres Will Refuse To Screen AI Short Film After Online Uproar
  5. How Streaming Became Cable TV’s Unlikely Life Raft
  6. PayPal Discloses Data Breach That Exposed User Info For 6 Months
  7. HSBC To Investors: If India Couldn’t Build an Enterprise Software Challenger, Neither Can AI
  8. Email Blunder Exposes $90 Billion Russian Oil Smuggling Ring
  9. US Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Global Tariffs
  10. Amazon Service Was Taken Down By AI Coding Bot
  11. Trump Directs US Government To Prepare Release of Files on Aliens and UFOs
  12. How Private Equity Debt Left a Leading VPN Open To Chinese Hackers
  13. New York Drops Plan To Legalize Robotaxis Outside NYC
  14. NASA Chief Classifies Starliner Flight As ‘Type A’ Mishap, Says Agency Made Mistakes
  15. Newborn Chicks Connect Sounds With Shapes Just Like Humans, Study Finds

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Microsoft Deletes Blog Telling Users To Train AI on Pirated Harry Potter Books

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft pulled a year-old blog post this week after a Hacker News thread flagged that it had encouraged developers to download all seven Harry Potter books from a Kaggle dataset — incorrectly marked as public domain — and use them to train AI models on the company’s Azure platform.

The blog, written in November 2024 by senior product manager Pooja Kamath, walked users through building Q&A systems and generating fan fiction using the copyrighted texts, and even included a Microsoft-branded AI image of Harry Potter. The Kaggle dataset’s uploader, data scientist Shubham Maindola, told Ars Technica the public domain label was “a mistake” and deleted the dataset after the outlet reached out.

OpenAI Has No Moat, No Tech Edge, No Lock-in and No Real Plan, Analyst Warns

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI faces four fundamental strategic problems that no amount of fundraising or capex announcements can paper over, according to analyst Benedict Evans: it has no unique technology, its enormous user base is shallow and fragile, incumbents like Google and Meta are leveraging superior distribution to close the gap, and its product roadmap is dictated by whatever the research labs happen to discover rather than by deliberate product strategy.

The company claims 800-900 million weekly active users, but 80% of them sent fewer than 1,000 messages across all of 2025, averaging fewer than three prompts a day, and only 5% pay. OpenAI has acknowledged what it calls a “capability gap” between what models can do and what people use them for — a framing Evans reads as a polite way to avoid admitting the absence of product-market fit. Gemini and Meta AI are meanwhile gaining share rapidly because the products look nearly indistinguishable to typical users, and Google and Meta already have the distribution to push them. Evans compares ChatGPT to Netscape — an early leader in a category where the products were hard to tell apart, overtaken by a competitor that used distribution as a crowbar.

On capex, Evans argues that Altman’s ambitions — claiming $1.4 trillion and 30 gigawatts of future compute — amount to an attempt to will OpenAI into a seat at a table where annual infrastructure spending may need to reach hundreds of billions. But a seat at the table is not leverage over it; he compares this to TSMC, which holds a de facto chip monopoly yet captures little value further up the stack.

OpenAI’s own strategy diagrams from late last year laid out a full-stack platform vision — chips, models, developer tools, consumer products — each layer reinforcing the others. Evans argues this borrows the language of Windows and iOS without possessing any of the underlying dynamics: no network effect, no lock-in preventing developers from calling a different model’s API, and no reason customers would know or care which foundation model powers the product they are using.

Hoarding resources for the sake of hope?

By Fly Swatter • Score: 3 Thread
Sounds like a plan, when no one can afford a home computer and all the computing is now hoarded in the datacenter/cloud/server… profit?!?

Fight Fire with Fire - Create LocalAI

By BrendaEM • Score: 3 Thread
No, we don’t need someone else spying, content-stealing billionaire-propping AI. We need something that can be downloaded locally, run on our 12TF video card, and lock out the billionaires who have already done too much damage to our society.

Note: I am against two computer technologies: blockchain and as-deployed AI. I guess that is why Slashdot gives my posts a level-1 initial value.

Several Meta Employees Have Started Calling Themselves ‘AI Builders’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Meta product managers are rebranding. Some are now calling themselves “AI builders,” a signal that AI coding tools are changing who gets to build software inside the company. One of them, Jeremie Guedj, announced the change in a LinkedIn post last week. “I still can’t believe I’m writing this: as of today, my full-time job at Meta is AI Builder,” he wrote.

Guedj has spent more than a decade as a traditional product manager, a role that sets the road map and strategy for products then built by engineering teams. He said that while his title in Meta’s internal systems still lists him as a product manager, his actual work is now full-time building with AI on what he calls an “AI-native team.” Another Meta product manager also lists “AI Builder” on her LinkedIn profile, while at least two other Meta engineers write the term in their bios, Business Insider found.

Bring back webmasters too

By abulafia • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
This is going to age like a 90s cybercafe.

If they’re right about how pervasive this crap will be, this is like a carpenter calling themselves a “Saw User”. If they’re wrong, it is like calling themselves a “Fax Machine Specialist”.

AMC Theatres Will Refuse To Screen AI Short Film After Online Uproar

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
When will AI movies start showing up in theaters nationwide? It was supposed to be next month. But when word leaked online that an AI short film contest winner was going to start screening before feature presentations in AMC Theatres, the cinema chain decided not to run the content.

The issue began earlier this week with the inaugural Frame Forward AI Animated Film Festival announcing Igor Alferov’s short film Thanksgiving Day had won the contest. The prize package for included Thanksgiving Day getting a national two-week run in theaters nationwide. When word of this began hitting social media, however, some were dismayed by the prospect of exhibitors embracing AI content, with many singling out AMC Theatres for criticism.

Except the short is not actually programmed by exhibitors, exactly, but by Screenvision Media — a third-party company which manages the 20-minute, advertising-driven pre-show before a theater’s lights go down. Screenvision — which co-organized the festival along with Modern Uprising Studios — provides content to multiple theatrical chains, not just AMC. After The Hollywood Reporter reached out to AMC about the brewing controversy, the company issued this statement to THR on Thursday: “This content is an initiative from Screenvision Media, which manages pre-show advertising for several movie theatre chains in the United States and runs in fewer than 30 percent of AMC’s U.S. locations. AMC was not involved in the creation of the content or the initiative and has informed Screenvision that AMC locations will not participate.”

Episodes

By michaelmalak • Score: 4 Thread
Based on 5-10 minute videos like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zZP1uzp_YQ, I look forward to feature-length fan replacements for Episodes VII, VIII, IX. Perhaps within a year?

I’m disgusted

By greytree • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Where can I stream it ?

How Streaming Became Cable TV’s Unlikely Life Raft

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Cable TV providers have spent the past decade losing tens of millions of households to streaming services, but companies like Charter Communications are now slowing that exodus by bundling the very apps that once threatened to replace them.

Charter added 44,000 net video subscribers in the fourth quarter of 2025, its first growth in that count since 2020, after integrating Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ directly into Spectrum cable packages — a deal that grew out of a contentious 2023 contract dispute with Disney. Comcast and Optimum still lost subscribers in the quarter, though both saw those losses narrow.

Charter’s Q4 numbers also got a lift from a 15-day Disney channel blackout on YouTube TV during football season, which drove more than 14,000 subscribers to Spectrum. Charter has been discounting aggressively — video revenue fell 10% year over year despite the subscriber gains. Cox Communications launched its first streaming-inclusive cable bundles last month, and Dish Network has yet to integrate streaming apps into its packages at all.

PayPal Discloses Data Breach That Exposed User Info For 6 Months

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
PayPal is notifying customers of a data breach after a software error in a loan application exposed their sensitive personal information, including Social Security numbers, for nearly 6 months last year. From a report:
The incident affected the PayPal Working Capital (PPWC) loan app, which provides small businesses with quick access to financing. PayPal discovered the breach on December 12, 2025, and determined that customers’ names, email addresses, phone numbers, business addresses, Social Security numbers, and dates of birth had been exposed since July 1, 2025.

The financial technology company said it has reversed the code change that caused the incident, blocking attackers’ access to the data one day after discovering the breach. “On December 12, 2025, PayPal identified that due to an error in its PayPal Working Capital (‘PPWC’) loan application, the PII of a small number of customers was exposed to unauthorized individuals during the timeframe of July 1, 2025 to December 13, 2025,” PayPal said in breach notification letters sent to affected users. “PayPal has since rolled back the code change responsible for this error, which potentially exposed the PII. We have not delayed this notification as a result of any law enforcement investigation.”

So they knew Dec 12th 2025

By oldgraybeard • Score: 3 Thread
And they finally got around to warning their customers now!
Wow! what timely action, but then it is only their customers that face risk.

HSBC To Investors: If India Couldn’t Build an Enterprise Software Challenger, Neither Can AI

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
India’s IT services giants have spent decades deploying, customizing, and maintaining the world’s largest enterprise software platforms, putting hundreds of thousands of engineers in daily contact with the business logic and proprietary architectures of vendors like SAP and Oracle. None of them have built a competing product that gained meaningful traction against the U.S. incumbents, HSBC said in a note to clients, using this history to argue AI-generated code faces the same structural barriers.

The bank’s analysts contend that enterprise software competition turns on factors that have little to do with the ability to write code — sales teams, cross-licensing agreements, patented IP, first-mover lock-in, brand awareness, and go-to-market infrastructure. If a massive, low-cost, domain-expert workforce couldn’t crack the market over several decades, HSBC argues, the idea that AI-generated code will do so is, in the words of Nvidia’s Jensen Huang that the report approvingly cites, “illogical.”

Enterprise software is bought with blowjobs anyway

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
OK, I can’t prove that whoever picked the enterprise software we use was fucking the sales rep, but that would be the most logical explanation. It can’t be on the merits of the software…it’s GARBAGE, from a top vendor, and just fucking sucks…when you analyze it, you can see it’s using 20 year old technology and hasn’t kept up with the times. It doesn’t need to actually work, just convince the decision maker it did.

I got my career start as a software engineer at consulting company that specialized in SAP deployments. It was well known that the sales were never based on merit, but on bribing and charming the decision makers.

However, consulting company reps look a lot more like pharmaceutical salespeople than software experts. It’s not old nerds with industry experience…we hired lots of women under 30 who were communications majors…they had breast implants and mastered the art of wearing business suits that showed them off…not enough to look like porn stars or that you’ll notice immediately, but that you’ll pick up on the cleavage during a conversation. They were sorority party girls that can pass for smart. The men were the male equivalents…charming bros that take you to the NBA/hockey game. I got to go to a few of those events.

The women mastered the craft of wearing their hair and makeup so that a routine straight guy wouldn’t notice they were trying to look hot, but they were…they smiled the right way, they charmed the customer…your stories were always interesting…“oooh, you went golfing where?…that’s so amazing!!!…oh, you’re thinking about getting a boat?…that sounds like so much fun.”

India, as famously corrupt as the country is reputed to be, their outsourcing firms aren’t into bribing with sex…at least to my knowledge. The Indian outsourcing companies I’ve worked with, as much as I despise them, were really trying to compete with their work. The SAP/PeopleSoft consulting firms were more lavish in perks, dinners, hot bimbos, charming bros…trips to your see your local NBA/NHL/MLB/NFL team, etc.

Enterprise software is a depressing dumpster fire of corruption.

I think it’s worse than that

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

… the idea that AI-generated code will do so is, in the words of Nvidia’s Jensen Huang that the report approvingly cites, “illogical.”

Entirely aside from the socioeconomic connections. domain knowledge, and early-to-the-market advantages that Oracle and SAP enjoy, there’s another reason that AI coding isn’t going to crack the market open. Excepting cases where AI is a time-saving assistant to a good programmer who carefully vets the code produced, AI-generated code is shit.

I have no direct experience of what I just wrote; but almost everything I see and read online - aside from puff-piece propaganda - says that AI doesn’t program well. It might give good snippets and a decent place to start, but for anything large and complex it seems to create barely-functional dreck.

And based on my (admittedly very limited) experience with programming, the really difficult parts of projects of this magnitude aren’t things that AI can currently do. When it comes to understanding business logic and process flow - and adapting to changes in those factors, and making sure the code is both commented well and self-commenting where that’s possible - AI just isn’t there. So let’s assume a wildly high figure of a 25% increase in programming efficiency across the board. Is that enough to replicate a decade or two of work experience in a few years or less? I don’t think so.

As always, IANAP so I look forward to being educated and contradicted if what I’m saying here is wrong.

U.S. Incumbents

By RobinH • Score: 3 Thread

None of them have built a competing product that gained meaningful traction against the U.S. incumbents

…and here I thought SAP was German.

As a programmer and daily claude user, I agree

By Somervillain • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Excepting cases where AI is a time-saving assistant to a good programmer who carefully vets the code produced, AI-generated code is shit.

I have no direct experience of what I just wrote; but almost everything I see and read online - aside from puff-piece propaganda - says that AI doesn’t program well. It might give good snippets and a decent place to start, but for anything large and complex it seems to create barely-functional dreck.

AI-generated code only sometimes compiles. It rarely works. It also is so slow it barely saves me time for easy tasks I know how to do. Today, I needed sample data for a unit test…PERFECT use case for AI…I prompted it to generate 3 examples of a specified class…it took several minutes in Claude Opus 4.6, so I just canceled it and did it myself. I retried it with another class and it didn’t even compile. It is not remotely reliable. If it was, the world would be a different place, as I’ve ranted many times before at /.. A reliable code generation tool that could build nice software with prompts would set the world afire and these evangelists and puff piece purveyors wouldn’t be writing about the glory of AI, but would be making vast fortunes chasing their software dreams.

They identified the issue…

By Junta • Score: 3 Thread

That the prevailing winners in the market are not winning based on code, but on marketing. Now amount of ‘here’s a cheaper knock-off’ is going to overcome the scare factor. Saving money won’t win any of these decision makers enough to warrant the risk of cocking up something important.

However, AI is pitching supreme bespokeness. The cover is not just about ‘saving money’, the emphasis is that it can be fit to your ‘special’ purpose.

It’s all a marketing game, and India low cost labor didn’t bring any marketing to the table, but the entire damn world is doing marketing for the LLM bros.

Email Blunder Exposes $90 Billion Russian Oil Smuggling Ring

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
schwit1 writes:
An IT blunder has revealed an apparent smuggling ring that has moved at least $90bn of Russian oil and is playing a central role in funding the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine. Financial Times has identified 48 seemingly independent companies working from different physical addresses that appear to be operating together to disguise the origin of Russian oil, particularly from Kremlin-controlled Rosneft. The network was discovered because they all share a single private email server.
The report adds:
The FT was able to identify 442 web domains whose public registrations show they all use a single private server for their email, “mx.phoenixtrading.ltd,” showing that they share back-office functions. The FT was then able to identify companies by comparing the names in the domain to those of entities that appear in Russian and Indian customs records as involved in carrying Russian oil.

Is this actionable information?

By Charlotte • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

In the sense that governments can use this to make a tangible difference in the Russo-Ukraine war?

Also: first post!

Re:Is this actionable information?

By RobinH • Score: 5, Informative Thread
There are estimated to be about 1000 ships in the shadow fleet, who are moving oil from sanctioned countries to other countries willing to buy it (think China and India, but also others). In order to operate, these all have insurance that’s mostly backed by Russia, etc. Until recently nobody knew if the insurance would actually pay out. But over the last month we’ve seen Ukraine actually attack some tankers, and the US chased down a couple carrying Venezuelan oil (one even sailing under a Russian flag), and most recently India said they’d confiscated a shadow fleet tanker, and then deleted their announcement, but it’s a big deal. With all this happening, the shadow fleet was already in danger of evaporating now that the threat of losing your ship is actually real, and the insurance payouts aren’t really guaranteed. This news about the email server isn’t going to move the needle that much, as it was already moving pretty fast in that direction.

What is more suspicious

By UnknowingFool • Score: 3 Thread
is they used the same email for the admin: “not_putin@phoenixtrading.ltd”

Well, this is curious (quick DNS analysis)

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 4, Informative Thread
DNS records show nameservers for that domain at Wild West, hosting at Amazon, and inbound mail at Outlook (Microsoft). But outbound email is likely originating from three SPF record-listed hosts at “FLEX TR Bilisim Sanayi Ticaret Ltd. Sti.”, which owns 185.207.3.0/24 and is located in Turkey. Given that Turkey is a member of NATO, I presume that some very pointed questions will be asked shortly.

It would be interesting to know what the 442 domains are.

Terrifying!

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

Do you have any idea how many companies are hiding behind .mail.protection.outlook.com?

US Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Global Tariffs

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down on Friday President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs that he pursued under a law meant for use in national emergencies, rejecting one of his most contentious assertions of his authority in a ruling with major implications for the global economy. From a report:
The justices, in a 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, upheld a lower court’s decision that the Republican president’s use of this 1977 law exceeded his authority.

The court ruled that the Trump administration’s interpretation that the law at issue - the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA - grants Trump the power he claims to impose tariffs would intrude on the powers of Congress and violate a legal principle called the “major questions” doctrine. The doctrine, embraced by the conservative justices, requires actions by the government’s executive branch of “vast economic and political significance” to be clearly authorized by Congress. The court used the doctrine to stymie some of Democratic former President Joe Biden’s key executive actions.

I’m hopeful: Tariffs fuck over conservatives too

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Tariffs failed. They didn’t accomplish their stated goals. The only thing they did was give DJT leverage to extract bribes and concessions from foreign powers. They made him a king as every leader had to kiss his ring to avoid economic disaster. DJT isn’t long for this world…both physically and legally, as his term ends in a little over 2 years. Conceptually, reciprocal tariffs could be an effective way to accomplish the stated goals of reducing unfair state-subsidized trade deficits and righting economic wrongs…but the Trump administration FAILED and FAILED HARD to implement them systematically or effectively or in a logical sound manner.

Also, remember, tariffs hurt American factories more than foreign ones because they pay tariffs on every piece of machinery and input. American cars have complex components going over the border for a step in Ontario, then coming back then going back to Detroit, then going back for another stage, etc…each border crossing incurs a tariff. Foreign factories only pay tariffs on the finished goods.

What’s more powerful than asshole conservatives? Corporate America. Trump got them to bend the knee at his inauguration…Tim Cook will give him some gold trophy…but Apple is not happy about these tariffs, especially the unpredictability of them. The corporate world has stated many times that if DJT adds tariffs, they’ll adjust accordingly…AKA raise prices....EVERY moron knows that. It’s just a consumption tax.

What has frustrated Corporate America is the unpredictability…taxes are fine…it’s just math to add extra cost to consumers, but not knowing how much to charge is total chaos and quite destructive. Let’s say DeWalt tools wants to build their new storage and hand tools lineup in the USA. Chinese labor is now typically more expensive than building in the USA. Without DJT’s asshattery, there is a compelling case for it. Any cost increase due to the USA enforcing regulations can be offset by less shipping costs and faster delivery to their main markets: USA & Canada.

OK, but now they can’t predict price of Steel, chromium, vanadium, rubber, plastic, etc. A nice ToughSystem box sells for $130 retail. Let’s assume Home Depot pays $65 per box. Let’s assume they can be built and shipped from overseas for $40 in Israel (Keter, who makes Packout/ToughSystem is Israeli). Israeli labor is not cheaper than American labor and they pay a huge shipping cost. Keter could easily set up a factory in Alabama or Iowa and make that for $30…assuming 2024 tariffs....OK, now steel is more expensive…so they need to buy US steel, but…there’s a shortage…so that’s doubled in price. Injection molding machinery from Germany has gotten more expensive. Chrome plating materials from Canada got more expensive.

So if it costs $40 to make in Israel and $30 in the USA 3 years ago, what does it cost today? In the last 2 years, that price has changed nearly every month....$0.50 added one month $0.10 dropped another…then a tweet stating it will go up $5…but not hearing any follow up. How the fuck can you run a business? Few segments of the economy can adjust prices in real time.

However, the irony is you’re fucking over American manufacturing more than overseas. Keter pays one tariff. A Chinese factory pays one tariff because they’re selling a finished good. The American factory pays tariffs on every raw material used.

Not only is King Donald fucking over his voters who are facing shortages, price increases, and various form of price gouging in their daily lives…he’s fucking over every Republican donor who can’t make a business plan and go about their lives like responsible adult companies. Who is benefiting…really just him and his corrupt inner circle....not his donors, not his voters.

The Supreme Court…as shitty as they currently are…know they will outlive Trump, both literally and politically. The world is watching them. Their stupidity can wreck the economy. I would be amazed if they sided with Trump over the entire fucking US economy.

Re:Judical independence

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Is there a day when you aren’t thinking about trans people?

Re:Don’t Get Too Excited

By tlhIngan • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The other regulations take time to implement and require Congress to get off their asses and work. That’s why Trump tried to short-circuit the whole process.

Which is silly, since with complete control of the government - the executive, the legislative (both branches), and the judicial, you should be able to do anything you want the proper way. The problem is the proper way is slow, and it’s designed that way because every change should be deliberate to avoid plunging everything into chaos.

All the tools were there to be used, all anyone had to do was actually use it.

Re:Don’t Get Too Excited

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Those require a lot more legal work and they are all temporary measures. If they were easier then Trump would have started with them.

Re:Two details of the ruling:

By Zelucifer • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Ah, I see the misunderstanding. So this case is specifically about the IEEPA tariffs. The legality of the other tariffs weren’t challenged, or were not challenged in this case. The number you used, 30%, threw me for a loop. IEEPA is actually about half of the tariffs. You can read a pretty succinct summary on NPR here:

https://www.npr.org/2026/02/20…

Amazon Service Was Taken Down By AI Coding Bot

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Amazon’s cloud unit has suffered at least two outages due to errors involving its own AI tools [non-paywalled source], leading some employees to raise doubts about the US tech giant’s push to roll out these coding assistants.

Amazon Web Services experienced a 13-hour interruption to one system used by its customers in mid-December after engineers allowed its Kiro AI coding tool to make certain changes, according to four people familiar with the matter.

The people said the agentic tool, which can take autonomous actions on behalf of users, determined that the best course of action was to “delete and recreate the environment.” Amazon posted an internal postmortem about the “outage” of the AWS system, which lets customers explore the costs of its services. Multiple Amazon employees told the FT that this was the second occasion in recent months in which one of the group’s AI tools had been at the centre of a service disruption.

Should have moved it to the cloud

By nucrash • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Have they considered moving Amazon Web Services to the cloud? They should do that.

Double standard

By Comboman • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m sure the AI apologists will soon be flooding the comments with “human coders make mistakes too”, but if a human coder decided to “delete and recreate the environment” of a running system they would be fired before the end of the day.

Obligatory

By Gilmoure • Score: 3 Thread

Ooh, Self-Burn.
Those are rare.

Re:Double standard

By TGK • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The problem here is that developers can take responsibility for the action while AI can not. Humans do make mistakes and that’s ok; best practice is not to just can employees for messing up. Once is a mistake. Twice is an HR event. When someone does something dumb we forgive but we also insist that meaningful steps are taken to prevent that problem in the future. AI can’t really take those steps because AI can’t be accountable for “don’t do it again.” Taking down production because you dropped a table once is forgivable. Taking it down twice for the same reason is a different matter.

The developer can be accountable. And if HR fails to hold them to account for it, HR is accountable. And if HR isn’t held accountable, leadership is. And if leadership isn’t held accountable, the board is. And if the board isn’t held accountable, the stockholders have some hard decisions to make. And if they choose not to make them than it wasn’t really that big a deal, was it?

But with an AI the option is “we stop using AI” or “we live with the result.”

Why does the coding bot have access to production?

By Troy Roberts • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Why does the coding bot have access to production? Generally development should not happen directly in productions.

Trump Directs US Government To Prepare Release of Files on Aliens and UFOs

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
US President Donald Trump says he will direct US agencies, including the defence department, to "begin the process of identifying and releasing" government files on aliens and extraterrestrial life. From a report:
Trump made the declaration in a post on Truth Social, after he accused Barack Obama earlier in the day of revealing classified information when the former president said “aliens are real” on a podcast last week. “He’s not supposed to be doing that,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, adding: “He made a big mistake.”

Asked if he also thinks aliens are real, Trump answered: “Well, I don’t know if they’re real or not.” Former US President Obama told podcast host Brian Tyler Cohen that he thinks aliens are real in an interview released last Saturday. “They’re real, but I haven’t seen them, and they’re not being kept in Area 51,” Obama said. “There’s no underground facility unless there’s this enormous conspiracy and they hid it from the president of the United States.”

Re:Nah - too narrow a definition of religion

By gtall • Score: 5, Informative Thread

“Overall evolution is running out of explanation for the ever larger facts that are challenging its claims. The most obvious of these are the irreducible complexity of many biological mechanisms that make their spontaneous emergence an unreasonably unlikely event; a lot of the time the evolutionist position comes down to: ‘of course it must have been evolution because I refuse to consider the alternative’. THAT is a faith statement ;)"

Ah, yet another variation on: gee, everything is sooooo complex, I don’t understand it, therefore God. Grow up, grasshopper. There is no credible alternative to “evolution”. God is not a credible alternative. Ever see him? Has he ever said squat to you? Can we test him for observations? No, no, and no.

“the irreducible complexity of many biological mechanisms that make their spontaneous emergence an unreasonably unlikely event;"

The irreducible complexity argument is right out of Intelligent Design, i.e., create a strawman and then declare him real. “spontaneous emergence”, yep, and you understand nothing about evolution if that is what you think. “unreasonably unlikely event”, Oh? So it is unfathomable to you so it must not have happened?

Try this, go to your bank and demand money because you cannot understand why they just don’t just hand you a bag of it.

Re:Science is now worse.

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

"..and then takes all those factual results and runs it through the religion of politics, to ensure whatever sacred (most profitable/beneficial) outcome the sponsors want to see, comes to fruition.”

No, science doesn’t do that. People do that.

“If science doesn’t push back more on the profit motive, it will be viewed as a religion. Because it is.”

This is your failure, it is caused by you misattributing corruption to science. Science is a process, it is not corrupt, people are corrupt.

Re:Epstein Aliens ?

By mjwx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There are probably many illegal aliens in the Epstein Files, but the criminals are the oligarchs.

Erm.. its exactly the same with undocumented workers.

There’s no shortage of them no matter how many get deported because there are rich locals willing to hire them… Considering that it’s impossible to punish a rich white man in the US, it won’t ever stop.

Re:Obvious distraction is obvious

By mjwx • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The Epstein Regime will soon be over hopefully.

Opens first X file…

Race: Kiddifidlarians
Planet: Epstienius 7

Distinguishing features: Orange skin, small hands, mouth shaped into an O.

Re: I’m not saying there are aliens.

By nonsenseponsense • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
So you think pedophilia is completely fine then? So you think hurting Trump’s (and your) feelings should be treated more harshly than raping and trafficking children? I don’t think you understand what TDS really is. It’s not his opponents that are obsessed with him. It’s people like you that will bend over backwards to defend him at any cost. Have you not got any actual morals?

How Private Equity Debt Left a Leading VPN Open To Chinese Hackers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg:
In early 2024, the agency that oversees cybersecurity for much of the US government issued a rare emergency order — disconnect your Connect Secure virtual private network software immediately. Chinese spies had hacked the code and infiltrated nearly two dozen organizations. The directive applied to all civilian federal agencies, but given the product’s customer base, its impact was more widely felt. The software, which is made by Ivanti Inc., was something of an industry standard across government and much of the corporate world. Clients included the US Air Force, Army, Navy and other parts of the Defense Department, the Department of State, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Federal Reserve, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, thousands of companies and more than 2,000 banks including Wells Fargo & Co. and Deutsche Bank AG, according to federal procurement records, internal documents, interviews and the accounts of former Ivanti employees who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose customer information.

Soon after sending out their order, which instructed agencies to install an Ivanti-issued fix, staffers at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency discovered that the threat was also inside their own house. Two sensitive CISA databases — one containing information about personnel at chemical facilities, another assessing the vulnerabilities of critical infrastructure operators — had been compromised via the agency’s own Connect Secure software. CISA had followed all its own guidance. Ivanti’s fix had failed. This was a breaking point for some American national security officials, who had long expressed concerns about Connect Secure VPNs. CISA subsequently published a letter with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the national cybersecurity agencies of the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand warning customers of the “significant risk” associated with continuing to use the software. According to Laura Galante, then the top cyber official in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the government came to a simple conclusion about the technology. “You should not be using it,” she said. “There really is no other way to put it.”

That attack, along with several others that successfully targeted the Ivanti software, illustrate how private equity’s push into the cybersecurity market ended up compromising the quality and safety of some critical VPN products, Bloomberg has found. Last year, Bloomberg reported that Citrix Systems Inc., another top VPN maker, experienced several major hacks after its private equity owners, Elliott Investment Management and Vista Equity Partners, cut most of the company’s 70-member product security team following their acquisition of the company in 2022. Some government officials and private-sector executives are now reconsidering their approach to evaluating cybersecurity software. In addition to excising private equity-owned VPNs from their networks, some factor private equity ownership into their risk assessments of key technologies.

Re:What Was The Outcome?

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The market punished them. Major customers have dumped the product.

Investors will lose money as the value of the company probably continues to decline, they have destroyed the brand.

New York Drops Plan To Legalize Robotaxis Outside NYC

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has dropped a proposal that would have allowed limited commercial robotaxi deployments outside New York City, citing a lack of support among state legislators. “The move is a blow to Waymo and other robotaxi companies who saw New York, and especially New York City, as a potential goldmine,” reports The Verge. From the report:
The plan, which was introduced by Hochul as part of the state’s budget proposal last month, would have allowed limited robotaxi deployment in cities other than the Big Apple — while leaving whether New York City would get autonomous vehicles up to the mayor and the City Council. But now that plan is DOA, as support in the legislature never materialized. “Based on conversations with stakeholders, including in the legislature, it was clear that the support was not there to advance this proposal,” Sean Butler, a Hochul spokesperson, said in a statement.
“While we are disappointed by the Governor’s decision, we’re committed to bringing our service to New York and will work with the State Legislature to advance this issue,” Waymo spokesperson Ethan Teicher said in a statement. “The path forward requires a collaborative approach that prioritizes transparency and public safety.”

NASA Chief Classifies Starliner Flight As ‘Type A’ Mishap, Says Agency Made Mistakes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
NASA has officially classified Boeing Starliner’s 2024 crewed flight as a “Type A” mishap, acknowledging serious technical failures and leadership shortcomings that nearly left astronauts unable to safely return. Administrator Jared Isaacman released (PDF) a 311-page internal report citing flawed decision-making and cultural issues, with the next Starliner flight now planned as uncrewed pending major fixes. Ars Technica reports:
As part of the announcement, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman sent an agency-wide letter that recognized the shortcomings of both Starliner’s developer, Boeing, as well as the space agency itself. Starliner flew under the auspices of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, in which the agency procures astronaut transportation services to the International Space Station. “We are taking ownership of our shortcomings,” Isaacman said.

“Starliner has design and engineering deficiencies that must be corrected, but the most troubling failure revealed by this investigation is not hardware,” Isaacman wrote in his letter to the NASA workforce. “It is decision-making and leadership that, if left unchecked, could create a culture incompatible with human spaceflight.” Isaacman said there would be “leadership accountability” as a result of the decisions surrounding the Starliner program, but did not say which actions would be taken.

Boing has a culture incompatible with human flight

By stooo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

>> a culture incompatible with human spaceflight.

Yep. Boing has already unlocked that achievement for normal planes, now they are trying hard in the spaceflight.

it’s called “Boeing” for a reason

By stooo • Score: 4, Funny Thread

It’s called “Boeing” for a reason.
That’s the sound generated at the exact moment the plane touches the ground.

Re:Disaster that classists caused

By 2TecTom • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

classism breeds corruption which produces incompetency

Too true

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“Starliner has design and engineering deficiencies that must be corrected, but the most troubling failure revealed by this investigation is not hardware,” Isaacman wrote in his letter to the NASA workforce. “It is decision-making and leadership that, if left unchecked, could create a culture incompatible with human spaceflight.”

No shit. It took an outsider to point out to the Artemis program that not a single one of them had ever read “SP-287 What Made Apollo a Success?” and so effectively used none of the knowledge and experience built up over the decade-plus of the Apollo program.

The helium leak

By yog • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

A helium leak was reported prior to launch, yet they proceeded with the mission because it was “minor”. Then, it became a major issue and they were forced to scrap the mission. Do I have it right?

The old NASA made occasional mistakes, but they had a culture of must-not-fail; each team had to prove their subsystem was nominal before the mission could proceed. Their dedication was legendary.

Politicization, DEI, and the general decline in American technical standards and work ethic have ruined Boeing and NASA.

Newborn Chicks Connect Sounds With Shapes Just Like Humans, Study Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Scientific American:
Why does “bouba” sound round and “kiki” sound spiky? This intuition that ties certain sounds to shapes is oddly reliable all over the world, and for at least a century, scientists have considered it a clue to the origin of language, theorizing that maybe our ancestors built their first words upon these instinctive associations between sound and meaning. But now a new study adds an unexpected twist: baby chickens make these same sound-shape connections, suggesting that the link to human language may not be so unique. The results, published today in Science, challenge a long-standing theory about the so-called bouba-kiki effect: that it might explain how humans first tethered meaning to sound to create language. Perhaps, the thinking goes, people just naturally agree on certain associations between shapes and sounds because of some innate feature of our brain or our world. But if the barnyard hen also agrees with such associations, you might wonder if we’ve been pecking at the wrong linguistic seed.

Maria Loconsole, a comparative psychologist at the University of Padua in Italy, and her colleagues decided to investigate the bouba-kiki effect in baby chicks because the birds could be tested almost immediately after hatching, before their brain would be influenced by exposure to the world. The researchers placed chicks in front of two panels: one featured a flowerlike shape with gently rounded curves; the other had a spiky blotch reminiscent of a cartoon explosion. They then played recordings of humans saying either “bouba” or “kiki” and observed the birds’ behavior. When the chicks heard “bouba,” 80 percent of them approached the round shape first and spent an average of more than three minutes exploring it compared with an average of just under one minute spent exploring the spiky shape. The exploration preferences were flipped when the chicks heard “kiki.”

Because the tests took place within the chicks’ carefully supervised first hours of life outside their eggshell, this association between particular sounds and shapes couldn’t have been learned from experience. Instead it may be evidence of an innate perceptual bias that goes back way farther in our evolutionary history than previously believed. “We parted with birds on the evolutionary line 300 million years ago,” says Aleksandra Cwiek, a linguist at Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toru, Poland, who was not involved in the study. “It’s just mind-blowing.”

Eating chicken

By spiritplumber • Score: 3 Thread
I wish they’d hurry up with vat grown meat, what we do to baby chicks today is… something else.

The likely reason looks obvious

By vyvepe • Score: 3 Thread
Kiki is a bit more loud at higher frequencies than buba.
Spiky shapes generate higher frequencies than rounded ones.
If the chicks were exposed to any sound and visual info before the test then one would expect this result. They may have learned the correlation between higher frequencies and spiky shapes even during the test. I think there is a tiny chance the correlation may be genetically “pre-wired” in brain.