Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Meta Debuts ‘Muse Spark’, First AI Model Under Alexandr Wang
  2. Microsoft Abruptly Terminates VeraCrypt Account, Halting Windows Updates
  3. Valve Releases Native Steam Link App For Apple’s Vision Pro
  4. Apple and Lenovo Have the Least Repairable Laptops, Analysis Finds
  5. CIA Reportedly Used Secret Quantum Tool To Find Downed Airman in Iran
  6. Planet Labs Tests AI-Powered Object Detection On Satellite
  7. Russian Government Hackers Broke Into Thousands of Home Routers To Steal Passwords
  8. Apple Faces ‘Massive Dilemma’ With Success of the MacBook Neo
  9. Anthropic Unveils ‘Claude Mythos’, Powerful AI With Major Cyber Implications
  10. Chrome Is Finally Getting Vertical Tabs
  11. Supreme Court Wipes Piracy Liability Verdict Against Grande Communications
  12. Testing Suggests Google’s AI Overviews Tells Millions of Lies Per Hour
  13. Anthropic Reveals $30 Billion Run Rate, Plans To Use 3.5GW of New Google AI Chips
  14. Cloudflare Fast-Tracks Post-Quantum Rollout To 2029
  15. New Revelations Reignite Crypto Scandal Involving Argentina’s President Milei

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Meta Debuts ‘Muse Spark’, First AI Model Under Alexandr Wang

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Meta has launched Muse Spark, its first major AI model under Alexandr Wang’s leadership. The model was built over the past nine months and is being positioned as a significant step up from Llama 4. Axios reports:
Muse Spark will power queries in the Meta AI app and Meta.ai website immediately, with plans to expand across Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. The model accepts voice, text and image inputs, but produces text-only output. […] Meta plans to release a version of Muse Spark under an open-source license.

The model uses a fast mode for casual queries and several reasoning modes. A “shopping mode” highlights how Meta hopes to differentiate itself. It combines large language models with data on user interests and behavior. Over time, the model will also power “features that cite recommendations and content people share across Instagram, Facebook, and Threads,” Meta said in a blog post.
Wang, the 29-year-old entrepreneur who co-founded Scale AI, joined Meta’s “superintelligence” unit last year to help Meta catch up to rival models from OpenAI and Anthropic.

Microsoft Abruptly Terminates VeraCrypt Account, Halting Windows Updates

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft has apparently terminated the account VeraCrypt uses to sign its Windows drivers and bootloader, leaving the encryption project unable to publish Windows updates and throwing future releases into doubt. VeraCrypt’s developer says Microsoft gave no clear explanation or warning for the move. “I didn’t receive any emails from Microsoft nor any prior warnings,” Mounir Idrassi, VeraCrypt’s developer, told 404 Media. From the report:
VeraCrypt is an open-source tool for encrypting data at rest. Users can create encrypted partitions on their drives, or make individual encrypted volumes to store their files in. Like its predecessor TrueCrypt, which VeraCrypt is based on, it also lets users create a second, innocuous looking volume if they are compelled to hand over their credentials. Last week, Idrassi took to the SourceForge forums to explain why he had been absent for a few months. The most serious challenge, he wrote, “is that Microsoft terminated the account I have used for years to sign Windows drivers and the bootloader.”

“Regarding VeraCrypt, I cannot publish Windows updates. Linux and macOS updates can still be done but Windows is the platform used by the majority of users and so the inability to deliver Windows releases is a major blow to the project,” he continued. “Currently I’m out of options.” Idrassi told 404 Media the termination happened in mid-January. “I was surprised to discover that I could no longer use my account,” he said.

On the forum and in the email to 404 Media, Idrassi shared what he said was the only message he received connected to the account shutdown. “Based on the information you have provided to date, we have determined that your organization does not currently meet the requirements to pass verification. There are no appeals available, we have closed your application,” it reads. Idrassi told 404 Media the message is concerning his company IDRIX. “As you can read in their message, they say that the organization (IDRIX) doesn’t meet their requirements, but I don’t see which requirement IDRIX suddenly stopped meeting,” he said. Idrassi said he has tried contacting Microsoft support, but he received automated responses that he believes contained AI-generated text.

US government

By dskoll • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Clearly, the US government is unhappy with regular people having robust data encryption.

This is why it is folly for non-US organizations to continue using closed-source US-based software. If they can’t see the security risks inherent in this practice, then I don’t know what to say.

Re:Microsoft issues the Linux keys too

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Disable secure boot and carry on as usual. Why are you using this in the first place?

Re:Microsoft issues the Linux keys too

By Murdoch5 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I also use secure boot, and self-manage the keys, since having someone else hold the keys completely mitigates the value of secure boot. It’s not ideal, and it creates a minor headache, but the gains massively outweigh the extra work required. I don’t run Windows, so at least that portion is mitigated by OS selection, but it still creates a headache when I have to install Microslop junk on my computer, since they expect a prebuilt key to be present.

Why doesn’t Microsoft want an independent encryption program running? They need to be able to steal all your data, and feed in to their AI training, and hand it over to police. Windows is not a safe OS, Microsoft has proven that time and time again. I use VeraCrypt frequently, any sensitive file on my computer is in a VeryCrypt volume.

If sensitivity is important, you must encrypt the file away from the OS, and other people. The entire point is to keep sensitive stuff safe, and since Microsoft has some delusional belief that all your files are their files, in the wrong hands, they block VeraCrypt.

Re:US government

By Locke2005 • Score: 4 Thread
Put it this way: would you use a closed-source OS implemented in China? What makes you think the US government is more trustworthy than the Chinese government, especially given the direction Trump is taking it? (To be fair, it’s been heading that way ever since 9/11.)

Re:Microsoft issues the Linux keys too

By whoever57 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I’ll add to this. Microsoft or the NSA has discovered a vulnerability in VeraCrypt and the government doesn’t want the author to be able to push out a fix.

Valve Releases Native Steam Link App For Apple’s Vision Pro

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Valve has released a native Steam Link beta for Apple Vision Pro, letting users stream their existing Steam games onto a large virtual screen in visionOS. It supports up to 4K resolution and will let you dynamically adjust the curve of the display. The Mac Observer reports:
Steam Link does not support VR titles in this beta, and Valve clearly states that the app is limited to 2D game streaming, but this still opens up a large library of games that users can play on a massive virtual screen inside Vision Pro.

At the same time, Vision Pro already handles 2D media very well, and this update builds on that strength by turning the headset into a portable gaming display that connects directly to your existing setup without needing extra hardware.

You can join the Steam Link beta through TestFlight right now, and this early release shows how Apple Vision Pro continues to expand beyond media into more practical and everyday use cases like gaming.

Apple and Lenovo Have the Least Repairable Laptops, Analysis Finds

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Apple earned the lowest grades in a report on laptop and smartphone repairability released today by the consumer advocacy group Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) Education Fund. The report, which looks at how easy devices are to disassemble and how easy it is to find repairability information, gave Apple a C-minus in laptop repairability and a D-minus in cell phone repairability. For its "Failing the Fix (2026): Grading laptop and cell phone companies on the fixability of their products" report, PIRG analyzed the 10 newest laptops and phones that were available via manufacturers’ French website in January. […] Apple leads the list of laptop repairability losers, largely due to it having low disassembly scores. Apple, along with Dell and Samsung, also lost a full point for being members of TechNet and the CTA. Lenovo had the second-worst grade with a C-minus. Like Apple, Lenovo had low disassembly scores.

It also lost 0.5 points for failing to properly post PDFs explaining the French repair scores for some of its newest laptops sold in the region, as required in France. This is especially noteworthy because Lenovo got an F in last year’s report for missing this information on at least 12 laptops. At the time, Lenovo director of communications David Hamilton provided a statement to Ars saying that the missing information was “due to a backend web compatibility issue that temporarily prevented the display of repairability scores on our Lenovo France website” that was “widely resolved.” However, it appears that over a year later, Lenovo still isn’t providing sufficient information to meet France’s requirements

“While Lenovo has improved somewhat with their compliance with French consumer law by providing more repair score PDFs on their website, we urge the company to resolve this multi-year issue,” this year’s report says. PIRG’s report concluded that “laptops are pretty stagnant in terms of repairability” across many of the eight most popular laptop brands in the US. However, Proctor noted to Ars that consumers’ access to parts, tools, and information that vendors have has improved, but improvements around ease of disassembly “take longer to realize.” He also praised vendors’ efforts to release more repairable designs, such as Apple’s MacBook Neo.
For its repairability index, PIRG weighed physical ease of disassembly most heavily, while also considering the availability of repair documentation, spare parts, spare-parts affordability, and other product-specific criteria. It then adjusted company grades by deducting points for membership in trade groups that oppose right-to-repair laws and adding small bonuses for manufacturers that supported right-to-repair legislation.
Acer stood out as the only laptop vendor that avoided the 0.5-point trade-group penalty, since it was not listed as a member of TechNet or the Consumer Technology Association.

Reliability?

By ratbag • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Surely how often repairs are needed should be taken into account? Anecdata time: 26 years without a fault in any of my laptops (they’re Apples, but I hear Lenovo and other brands can be quite reliable as well) or either of the desktops. No iPhone (since 3G) or iPad that I’ve owned has ever gone wrong either.

Previous Dells and other cheaper brands that I owned last century weren’t so reliable for me and I would have cared about repairability.

Most Thinkpads Quite Repairable

By BrendaEM • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Most Thinkpads have customer removable units: drives and keyboards. Generally, the batteries are not glued in. There are no security screws. Mine is a P15 Gen 2. Lenovo’s repair videos: https://support.lenovo.com/us/…

is the Neo being considered?

By v1 • Score: 3 Thread

I thought there were a lot of groups praising the repairability of the new Neo? Did they not consider it? or is it more a matter of it being a single model in a larger brand of less repairables?

Re:Most Thinkpads Quite Repairable

By Junta • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Couldn’t find actual details on *which* models they looked at.

If you look at the non-ThinkPad Lenovo laptops… They are complete shit for repairability.

The ThinkPads on the other hand tend to be very very good.

But other issues make me wonder about their competency in writing the report. Notably they give Lenovo a “lobbying penalty” for being a member of a group that fights right to repair but gives Motorola a pass for not being in those groups.... Lenovo and Motorola are the same company, and they don’t seem to realize that.

Re:Values

By SvnLyrBrto • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

You fail to realize that different people have different needs and priorities… and that is 100% A-OK. This whole “If this product is not the perfect product for me, Me, ME; than it is crap and should not be sold to anyone.” business was tedious from the start and has gone on far too long.

My own laptop needs and priorities are light weight and long battery life. For my use case, those two stand above all other considerations by a fair margin. And if repairability suffers in order to shave off a half-pound or to gain another hour of battery life, so be it. So obviously, I’m on a MacBook Air. It is the right laptop for ME.

It sounds like you have different needs and priorities than I do. So that MacBook Air is probably NOT the right laptop for you. But you know what? That is ALSO 100% A-OK.

CIA Reportedly Used Secret Quantum Tool To Find Downed Airman in Iran

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
alternative_right quotes a report from the New York Post:
The CIA used a futuristic new tool called “Ghost Murmur” to find and rescue the second American airman who was shot down in southern Iran, The Post has learned. The secret technology uses long-range quantum magnetometry to find the electromagnetic fingerprint of a human heartbeat and pairs the data with artificial intelligence software to isolate the signature from background noise, two sources close to the breakthrough said. It was the tool’s first use in the field by the spy agency — and was alluded to Monday afternoon by President Trump and CIA Director John Ratcliffe at a White House briefing.
“It’s like hearing a voice in a stadium, except the stadium is a thousand square miles of desert,” a source briefed on the program told The Post. “In the right conditions, if your heart is beating, we will find you.” The relatively barren landscape made for “an ideal first operational use” of Ghost Murmur, the first source noted.
“Normally this signal is so weak that it can only be measured in a hospital setting with sensors pressed nearly against the chest,” the source said. “But advances in a field known as quantum magnetometry — specifically sensors built around microscopic defects in synthetic diamonds — have apparently made it possible to detect these signals at dramatically greater distances.”

“The capability is not omniscient. It works best in remote, low-clutter environments and requires significant processing time,” this person added.

Re: So, they invented…

By PseudoThink • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think it’s more likely they invented a cover story for how they actually found the pilot. Why would the CIA advertise this tech, otherwise? In this case, maybe they just replaced carrots with “quantum”.

Also

By jrq • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Eating carrots is guaranteed to improve your night-vision

Re:More from the “never happened” department

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Now discuss why North Korea was allowed to achieve nuclear status.

Re: So, they invented…

By burtosis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It is not clear that the CIA wanted to advertise this. At least from the blurb, all we know is that la Presidenta and his goon Ratcliffe could not keep their mouths shut. Having his goon as head of the CIA is a security problem from the get-go.

I have some experience with SQUIDS and while you can do some cool things with them the idea you could isolate a human heartbeat beyond a few yards or meters is nonsense. It might make for a cool urban search and rescue tool for locating an unconscious body a few feet away but you aren’t locating a single human heart beat from 50 miles away in a search area of 10,000 square miles. Sure, they used some new widget(s) to find them but this story is pure BS.

Re:More from the “never happened” department

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Trump wasn’t President.

People now know how bad it would be.

Iran are more bloodthirsty.

Iran wasn’t planning to become a hermit kingdom, but leader of the Muslim world hell bent on world conquest.

How many more reasons do you need?

1) Irrelevant
2) Look in the mirror
3) Opinion
4) Iran is the “leader of the Muslim world”? “hell bent on world conquest”? Citation needed

Now ArchieBunker, you tell us why you want Iran to have long range nuclear ballistic missiles?

Surely you position can’t be “because North Korea has them”.

Because once you achieve nuclear status you stop being invaded or bombed. Take a history lesson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

See where that got Ukraine?

Planet Labs Tests AI-Powered Object Detection On Satellite

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
Artificial intelligence has now run directly on a satellite in orbit. A spacecraft about 500km above Earth captured an image of an airport and then immediately ran an onboard AI model to detect airplanes in the photo. Instead of acting like a simple camera in space that sends raw data back to Earth for later analysis, the satellite performed the computation itself while still in orbit.

The system used an NVIDIA Jetson Orin module to run the object detection model moments after the image was taken. Traditionally, Earth observation satellites capture images and transmit large datasets to ground stations where computers process them hours later. Running AI directly on the satellite could reduce that delay dramatically, allowing spacecraft to analyze events like disasters, infrastructure changes, or aircraft activity almost immediately.
“This success is a glimpse into the future of what we call Planetary Intelligence at scale,” said Kiruthika Devaraj, VP of Avionics & Spacecraft Technology. “By running AI at the edge on the NVIDIA Jetson platform, we can help reduce the time between ‘seeing’ a change on Earth and a customer ‘acting’ on it, while simultaneously minimizing downlink latency and cost. This shift toward integrated AI at the edge is a technological leap that can help differentiate solutions like Planet’s Global Monitoring Service (GMS), providing valuable insights for our customers and enabling rapid response times when it matters most.”

bent pipe

By johnjones • Score: 3 Thread

for fecks sake

there is a reason why you dont do compute in space its dumb and however much you think there is power etc you still have to launch that weight up there
best option is to do all of this on earth and raw data transmitted is the best option

the ultimate is a passive system like a bent pipe

get over it

Not impressive, a Pre-ML 1990s PC doable problem

By drnb • Score: 3 Thread

Instead of acting like a simple camera in space that sends raw data back to Earth for later analysis, the satellite performed the computation itself while still in orbit.

Detecting aircraft in a satellite image is something that human coded algorithmic computer vision, not machine learning, could do in the 1990s on a desktop PC. That a Jetson could handle a model recognizing aircraft is not surprising at all. It is a rather simple problem. Again, Pre-ML 1990s PC doable.

Smart phones and smart watches are already pioneering local ML processing. The machine learning models that can be run on the CPU inside an Apple Watch are impressive. Amazing onboard voice analysis.

Its cool satellites are doing this too, but there is nothing new or surprising here.

What’s the point?

By paulidale • Score: 3 Thread
I don’t see what the point of this is or why anyone would bother. AI requires lots of compute which in turn requires lots of power and generates lots of heat. In space, power is at a premium and it’s difficult to get rid of excess heat. It is far easier to transmit the data to the ground and do the computations there. Ground based compute can also be upgraded far more readily.

Russian Government Hackers Broke Into Thousands of Home Routers To Steal Passwords

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
A group of Russian government hackers have hijacked thousands of home and small business routers around the world as part of an ongoing campaign aimed at redirecting victim’s internet traffic to steal their passwords and access tokens, security researchers and government authorities warned on Tuesday. […] The hacking group targeted unpatched routers made by MikroTik and TP-Link using previously disclosed vulnerabilities according to the U.K. government’s cybersecurity unit NCSC and Lumen’s research arm Black Lotus Labs, which released new details of the campaign Tuesday.

According to the researchers, the hackers were able to spy on large numbers of people over the course of several years by compromising their routers, many of which run outdated software, leaving them vulnerable to remote attacks without their owners’ knowledge. The NCSC said that these operations are “likely opportunistic in nature, with the actor casting a wide net to reach many potential victims, before narrowing in on targets of intelligence interest as the attack develops.” Per the researchers and government advisories, the Russian hackers hacked routers to modify the device’s settings so that the victim’s internet requests are surreptitiously passed to infrastructure run by the hackers. This allows the hackers to redirect victims to spoof websites under their control, then steal passwords and tokens that let the hackers log in to that victim’s online accounts without needing their two-factor authentication codes.

Black Lotus Labs said that Fancy Bear compromised at least 18,000 victims in around 120 countries, including government departments, law enforcement agencies, and email providers across North Africa, Central America, and Southeast Asia. Microsoft, which also released details of the campaign on Tuesday, said in a blog post that its researchers identified over 200 organizations and 5,000 consumer devices affected by these hacking operations, including at least three government organizations in Africa.
The Justice Department said Tuesday it neutralized compromised routers in the U.S. under court authorization. As the DOJ put it, the FBI “developed a series of commands to send to compromised routers” to collect evidence, reset settings, and prevent hackers from breaking back in.

Re:How did they get initial access to the routers?

By darkain • Score: 4, Informative Thread

that would require session tracking information on literally every single customer. and is also a direct violation of the basic ideals of “net neutrality”. these are why it is handled at the edge rather than by the trunk routers.

oh, and also, the internet as a whole is a-symmetrical in routing. the only way this is practical is on the edge, or MAYBE one hop up from an edge router (assuming there is no dynamic load balancing going on that you cannot see)

Fancy Bear?

By Powercntrl • Score: 3, Funny Thread

Has anyone informed this hacker group that, seeing as how people usually don’t keep bears as pets (well, it is Russia we’re talking about here, so I could be wrong on that), their namesake is a bear who is totally fabulous?

That’s like calling your far right-wing organization “Proud Boys”.

OpenWRT

By hcs_$reboot • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
1. Choose a router that supports OpenWRT
2. Install OpenWRT on it
Safer, faster and more customizable than the factory install.

Re:OpenWRT

By anoncoward69 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Unfortunately not for a vast majority of the population. Just getting them to successfully flash an alternative firmware without bricking the router would be challenge #1, Next challenge is the needing of a basic understanding of how networking works to successfully configure something like OpenWRT.

Apple Faces ‘Massive Dilemma’ With Success of the MacBook Neo

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple may have a supply problem on its hands with the MacBook Neo… The laptop reportedly relies on “binned” A18 Pro chips with one GPU core disabled, and demand is so strong that the supply of those cheaper leftover chips could run out before the next model is ready. That leaves Apple choosing between lower margins, shifting production plans, or changing the lineup to keep its $599 hit product in stock. MacRumors reports:
The all-new MacBook Neo has been such a hit that Apple is facing a “massive dilemma,” according to Taiwan-based tech columnist and former Bloomberg reporter Tim Culpan. […] In the latest edition of his Culpium newsletter today, Culpan said the MacBook Neo is selling so well that Apple’s supply of the binned A18 Pro chips with a 5-core GPU will “run out” before the company is able to fully satisfy demand for the laptop. Apple’s initial plan was to have suppliers build around five to six million MacBook Neo units before ceasing production of the model with the A18 Pro chip, he said, but it sounds like demand is so strong that Apple might run out of A18 Pro chips to put in the MacBook Neo before the second-generation MacBook Neo with an A19 Pro chip is ready next year. Apple is unlikely to mark the MacBook Neo as temporarily sold out, so it may be forced to take action, but profit margins might be affected.

A18 Pro chips are manufactured with TSMC’s second-generation 3nm process, known as N3E, and Culpan said TSMC’s N3E production lines are currently operating at maximum capacity. As a result, he said that Apple may have to pay a premium to restart A18 Pro chip production for the MacBook Neo, which would lower its profit margins. Apple would have to disable a GPU core on these chips to ensure that they have only a 5-core GPU, like all other MacBook Neo units sold to date. Alternatively, Culpan said that Apple could reallocate some of its chip production that was originally planned for other devices, but he said the cost would still be higher than what it paid for its initial batch of A18 Pro chips.

Culpan speculated that Apple could also opt to discontinue the $599 model with 256GB of storage, leaving the $699 model with 512GB of storage and a Touch ID button as the only configuration available. This is unlikely to happen any time soon, in our view, given how heavily Apple has been promoting the MacBook Neo’s affordability. Apple might also be able to move up the release of a MacBook Neo with the iPhone 17 Pro’s A19 Pro chip, but that too would be a costlier option, at least until the company achieves a sufficient stockpile of binned A19 Pro chips with a 5-core GPU. In any case, Apple could opt to keep the starting price of current and future MacBook Neo models at $599 and simply accept lower profit margins on the laptop, especially given that it attracts customers to the macOS and broader Apple ecosystem.

A hammer and a nail

By Tomahawk • Score: 3 Thread
(and good eyesight and a really steady hand) Sorted!

Built from leftover parts

By Local ID10T • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Imagine the conversation in the boardroom:

"It’s nearly 100% profit. We built it out of leftover parts!"

"They are selling out -we need to make more."

"…shit. We are running out of leftover parts."

"Call it a ‘Limited Edition’ and double the price."

Sounds like a good problem to have

By karmawarrior • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Apple has rarely dipped into the mass markets before now when it came to computers, the Mac mini being the rare exception, which was just a little too nerdy (needing your left over keyboard, mouse, and monitor) to actually be a mass market product. Maybe the success of their mass market non-computer stuff has helped them dip a toe in the waters.

In any case, I’m happy they’re trying it and having the right kinds of problems.

Apple is Doomed!

By david.emery • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Apple makes a superior product from ‘spare parts’ that has the low end PC community worrying how they’ll match it at that price and now they can’t make enough of them to meet demand. And they do this when other vendors are worrying about where they’ll find memory chips. Yup, Apple is Doomed!

Re:Built from leftover parts

By Whateverthisis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Totally different business but exactly the same problem. Nordstrom generally has the latest trend clothes in fashion and pretty good quality; it’s known for it. But when it had leftover inventory it knew there were people a step down from their target demographic that would love Nordstrom’s quality products even if they’re a season or two out of fashion for cheaper, so they opened Nordstrom’s Rack to sell off the excess inventory.

Nordstrom’s Rack got so popular they couldn’t keep it stocked, and eventually started developing their own dedicated Nordstrom Rack brands, which sort of defeated the purpose of Nordstrom’s Rack as it’s entire value was Nordstrom’s quality, late season, at a discount, but now it’s discount quality with the Nordstrom’s name on it.

Law of unintended consequences I guess.

Anthropic Unveils ‘Claude Mythos’, Powerful AI With Major Cyber Implications

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“Anthropic has unveiled Claude Mythos, a new AI model capable of discovering critical vulnerabilities at scale,” writes Slashdot reader wiredmikey. “It’s already powering Project Glasswing, a joint effort with major tech firms to secure critical software. But the same capabilities could also accelerate offensive cyber operations.” SecurityWeek reports:
Mythos is not an incremental improvement but a step change in performance over Anthropic’s current range of frontier models: Haiku (smallest), Sonnet (middle ground), and Opus (most powerful). Mythos sits in a fourth tier named Copybara, and Anthropic describes it as superior to any other existing AI frontier model. It incorporates the current trend in the use of AI: the modern use of agentic AI. “The powerful cyber capabilities of Claude Mythos Preview are a result of its strong agentic coding and reasoning skills… the model has the highest scores of any model yet developed on a variety of software coding tasks,” notes Anthropic in a blog titled Project Glasswing — Securing critical software for the AI era.

In the last few weeks, Mythos Preview has identified thousands of zero-day vulnerabilities with many classified as critical. Several are ten or 20 years old — the oldest found so far is a 27-years old bug in OpenBSD. Elsewhere, a 16-years old vulnerability found in video software has survived five million hits from other automated testing tools without ever being discovered. And it autonomously found and chained together several in the Linux kernel allowing an attacker to escalate from ordinary user access to complete control of the machine. […] Anthropic is concerned that Mythos’ capabilities could unleash cyberattacks too fast and too sophisticated for defenders to block. It hopes that Mythos can be used to improve cybersecurity generally before malicious actors can get access to it.

To this end, the firm has announced the next stage of this preparation as Project Glasswing, powered by Mythos Preview. Given the rate of AI progress, it will not be long before such capabilities proliferate, potentially beyond actors who are committed to deploying them safely. “Project Glasswing is a starting point. No one organization can solve these cybersecurity problems alone: frontier AI developers, other software companies, security researchers, open-source maintainers, and governments across the world all have essential roles to play.” Claude Mythos Preview is described as a general-purpose, unreleased frontier model from Anthropic that has nevertheless completed its training phase. The firm does not plan to make Mythos Preview generally available. The implication is that ‘Preview’ is a term used solely to describe the current state of Mythos and the market’s readiness to receive it, and will be dropped when the firm gets closer to general release.

Re:Anyone got examples

By awwshit • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Limited info here: https://red.anthropic.com/2026…

Sounds like more details in 90+45 days.

Re:Great, more marketing myths

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That is a remarkable take, and not in a good way. Not defending AI, just appalled by the disrespect for finding and fixing vulnerabilities. Finding vulnerabilities is a core part of closing them, it doesn’t only matter when an attacker does it.

Re: Anyone got examples

By Lothsahn • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
They have multiple documented patched zero days and provided sha3 verifiable hashes for ones that will be released in the next 135 days. Knowing Anthropic and their track record, it seems highly unlikely they’re lying. This is a game changer to the security community. In the long term it should be great, but in the short term it is going to surface hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities.

Re:Costly status quo?

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

it’s using horrendous amounts of power and causing untold environmental damage

Comparable to, say, a 787 airliner, whose environmental damage we tolerate without thought or comment simply because we’re already used to it.

while maintaining the existing overall parity between the bad guys and the worse guys.

Consider the alternative, then. Anthropic does nothing, and sooner or later OpenAI or some other less responsible company delivers an AI with similar capabilities, but just throws it out to the public without much thought about the consequences. Both the black hats and the white hats start using it, of course, but the black hats have a field day compromising anything and everything before the white hats have a chance to find, fix, and distribute all the necessary patches to defend against all the newfound exploits. Not a great situation to be in, but probably unavoidable at this point unless the white hats are given a head start.

Re:Great, more marketing myths

By gweihir • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It may be fundamentally changing the cybersecurity landscape, but if so, it does not do so in a good way. What is happening is that defenders get some things, not a lot, but attackers get a massive upgrade. In particular, I have research that finds that on the defender side, LLMs do not find even relatively obvious vulnerabilities reliably. Finding some things does not cut it for defenders when the attackers can randomize and have a chance to find other things than the defenders found.

Personally, I think defenders have reached the end of the sustainability of the “test and fix” approach, because searching for vulnerabilities is a massive more powerful tool for attackers due to that randomization possibility that the defenders do not have. After all, an attacker just has to find one vulnerability that works. The defenders have to find and fix all (!) vulnerabilities that AI does now allow the attackers to find for cheap. That is really bad. Even worse is that AI can cheaply write crappy attack code that sometimes work, which is all the attackers need. That is the second barrier that is failing. Up to now writing working attack code was slow and expensive and gave the defenders time when it was not a zero-day.

My take is we will have to massive upgrade software quality and use “secure by construction” for anything that needs to survive being exposed to the Internet in the future. The problem with that is that most current coders cannot do it. Hence we probably will get significant unemployment on one side and far more expensive software creation on the other. Well, looks like we will be making a real step towards professionalization of IT and that is always painful, but in the end it probably will be a good thing when the dust settles.

Chrome Is Finally Getting Vertical Tabs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Chrome is finally adding built-in vertical tabs, “which will move the tabs to the side of the browser window, making it easier to read full page titles and manage tab groups,” reports TechCrunch. The company is also introducing an immersive reading mode for a distraction-free, text-focused experience. From the report:
The company notes that the new vertical tabs can be enabled at any time by right-clicking on a Chrome window and selecting “Show Tabs Vertically.” The company says there’s no hard limit on the number of tabs that can be opened (beyond what would be limited already by the user’s hardware). The vertical tabs work just as the horizontal tabs do, meaning you can have different Chrome windows with their own set of tabs or tab groups.

[…] Alongside the launch of vertical tabs, Chrome is also rolling out a new Reading Mode experience, which will offer a full-page interface to make it even easier to reduce on-screen clutter to focus on the text. This will be the new default experience for Chrome users, and arrives at a time when web pages, particularly those on news sites, have become cluttered with ads and prompts to subscribe to newsletters.

Chrome does it? Time to move on.

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Next? Diagonal tabs. They just plaster the tabs right across the browser window corner to corner. You can, however, choose which diagonal course it takes. Left lower to right upper, or left upper to right lower. True configurable innovation!

Re:Why?

By maladroit • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why do these browser companies think anyone wants vertical tabs?

Because people, including me, have asked for it and use it.
https://forums.opera.com/topic…
https://www.theverge.com/tech/…
https://www.makeuseof.com/goog…

What workflow is broken by having a vertical tab option?

Re:As long as it’s just an option

By maladroit • Score: 4, Informative Thread

?!?
The width of the side tab bar is adjustable.

OTOH, the tabs across the top keep shrinking every time you add one.

Re:“Finally”

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

No need for the sarcasm. Enough people wanted this that multiple extensions exist for it.

Re:As long as it’s just an option

By swillden • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I think it’s for a certain kind of workflow. If you want to watch YouTube videos it kind of does nothing useful. If you want to swap between documents and reference materials a lot, much more helpful. I think the answer is “It sucks because it’s for multitasking, not because it is a bad idea.”

I think it depends less on workflow and more on screen layout. If you run your browser maximized on a landscape-mode display, there’s a lot of horizontal real estate that isn’t very well-used, while vertical space is at a premium. So it makes sense to move tabs to the side.

On the other hand, if you don’t maximize your window but keep it as narrow as possible (so you can see other windows) but just wide enough that sites render well, then you’ll probably prefer them on top.

On the gripping hand, if you’re like me and run your browser full-screen on a portrait mode screen, then you have gobs of vertical real-estate and tabs on top definitely makes sense.

(I have three monitors, a 32” (landscape) in the center, which is where my IDE, editors, and “focused” work lives, and a 27” portrait orientation monitor on each side. The left one has a full-screen browser window for work stuff and the right one has a full-screen browser window for personal stuff. It’s fantastic.)

Supreme Court Wipes Piracy Liability Verdict Against Grande Communications

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TorrentFreak:
Following on the heels of the landmark Cox v. Sony ruling, the Supreme Court has vacated the contributory copyright infringement verdict against ISP Grande Communications, ordering the Fifth Circuit to reconsider its decision in light of the new precedent. […] The order (PDF) effectively removes the case from the Supreme Court docket, urging the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to take another look at its decision in light of the new ruling.

Given the similarities between the two cases, it is no surprise that the Supreme Court came to this conclusion. It is now up to the Fifth Circuit to revisit whether Grande’s conduct meets the intent threshold that was established in Cox. That is a significantly higher bar than the one applied in the original verdict, which found that continuing to provide service to known infringers was enough to establish material contribution.

The music companies previously said they sent over a million copyright infringement notices, but that Grande failed to terminate even a single subscriber account in response. However, without proof of active inducement, these absolute numbers carry less weight now. Whether this translates into a win for Grande on remand remains to be seen. For now, however, the original $47 million verdict is further away than ever.

Anything that makes Music Companies Mad

By Dishevel • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
Anything that makes Music Companies Mad is 100% fine with me.
Screw labels.

Electric Company

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why not notify their electric company to cut their power to halt infringement?

Or their water company so the house is uninhabitable?

The Courts need to recognize that Internet has become a necessary utility and that the music companies need to deal with the individual directly through the Courts, not in a lazy clandestine way.

Grande seems based.

Re:Electric Company

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The Courts need to recognize that Internet has become a necessary utility and that the music companies need to deal with the individual directly through the Courts, not in a lazy clandestine way.

The record labels were originally suing individual users back in the Napster days and it was causing a bit bad PR for them.

I also can’t help but think that going after ISPs is something of a cash grab, since I really don’t know anyone who even bothers trying to pirate music anymore. It’s no longer worth the effort with how cheap music streaming services are.

It’s too expensive to do that

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Litigating each individual infringer is impossibly expensive for them. That’s why they tried to go through the utility company.

For now what they will probably do is pick off a few people here and there to use as examples and use the full weight of the legal system to ruin their lives. Of course if you know anything about criminal justice harsh punishments are not effective deterrence.

So far the only reliable way to stop piracy has been to make a product that is better and have consumers that can actually afford to consume.

Re:Electric Company

By markdavis • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

>“I agree with the decision handed down.”

I do too

>“I do not agree with legislating from the bench. The courts need to apply the laws as written, not make up new laws. We have a branch of government for making new laws.”

The problem is that the laws are often not well written and too flexible, generic, undefined, or even contradictory. The other problem is when the legislature is too chicken s*** to make a stand on anything and do their jobs. Instead, they just shove all their responsibilities onto unelected agencies with nebulous, overly-broad mandates. That way the legislators can’t be held accountable for anything.

Testing Suggests Google’s AI Overviews Tells Millions of Lies Per Hour

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A New York Times analysis found Google’s AI Overviews now answer questions correctly about 90% of the time, which might sound impressive until you realize that roughly 1 in 10 answers is wrong. "[F]or Google, that means hundreds of thousands of lies going out every minute of the day,” reports Ars Technica. From the report:
The Times conducted this analysis with the help of a startup called Oumi, which itself is deeply involved in developing AI models. The company used AI tools to probe AI Overviews with the SimpleQA evaluation, a common test to rank the factuality of generative models like Gemini. Released by OpenAI in 2024, SimpleQA is essentially a list of more than 4,000 questions with verifiable answers that can be fed into an AI.

Oumi began running its test last year when Gemini 2.5 was still the company’s best model. At the time, the benchmark showed an 85 percent accuracy rate. When the test was rerun following the Gemini 3 update, AI Overviews answered 91 percent of the questions correctly. If you extrapolate this miss rate out to all Google searches, AI Overviews is generating tens of millions of incorrect answers per day.

The report includes several examples of where AI Overviews went wrong. When asked for the date on which Bob Marley’s former home became a museum, AI Overviews cited three pages, two of which didn’t discuss the date at all. The final one, Wikipedia, listed two contradictory years, and AI Overviews confidently chose the wrong one. The benchmark also prompts models to produce the date on which Yo Yo Ma was inducted into the classical music hall of fame. While AI Overviews cited the organization’s website that listed Ma’s induction, it claimed there’s no such thing as the Classical Music Hall of Fame.
“This study has serious holes,” said Google spokesperson Ned Adriance. “It doesn’t reflect what people are actually searching on Google.” The search giant likes to use a test called SimpleQA Verified, which uses a smaller set of questions that have been more thoroughly vetted.

I don’t believe it

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Alice laughed. “There’s no use trying,” she said. “One can’t believe impossible things.”

“I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said Google. “Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.”

I use gemini

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It often gives excellent answers, but when it doesn’t, the results are strange.
I asked for help writing code for an obscure hobby CNC control system.
It totally invented function calls and invented plausible documentation to explain how they worked and how to call them.
It totally missed the easy answer that involved calling an existing simple function and writing no new code.
If the answer doesn’t exist on the internet, it appears to just make one up

I don’t know about that

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I mean based on the president of the United states? Those are rookie numbers. Come on Google you can do better!

And people believe AI…

By mspohr • Score: 5, Informative Thread

According to an article here a few days ago, 70% of people just accept whatever AI tells them without thinking.

Re:So what you’re saying is…

By ranton • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Google has implemented Trump Mode in their AI?

No, they said Google tells the truth 90% of the time, not 10%.

Anthropic Reveals $30 Billion Run Rate, Plans To Use 3.5GW of New Google AI Chips

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic says its annualized revenue run rate has surpassed $30 billion and disclosed plans to secure roughly 3.5 gigawatts of next-generation Google TPU compute starting in 2027. Broadcom will supply the key chips and networking gear for the effort, the company announced. The Register reports:
News of the two deals emerged today in a Broadcom regulatory filing that opens with two items of news. One is a “Long Term Agreement for Broadcom to develop and supply custom Tensor Processing Units (“TPUs”) for Google’s future generations of TPUs.” Google and Broadcom have collaborated to produce custom TPUs. Broadcom CEO Hock Tan recently shared his opinion that hyperscalers don’t have the skill to create custom accelerators and predicted Broadcom’s chip business will therefore win over $100 billion of revenue from AI chips in 2027 alone.

Working on next-gen TPUs for Google will presumably help to make that prediction a reality. So will the second part of Broadcom’s announcement: a “Supply Assurance Agreement for Broadcom to supply networking and other components to be used in Google’s next-generation AI racks through up to 2031.” Broadcom’s filing also revealed one user of Google’s next-gen TPU will be Anthropic, which starting in 2027, “will access through Broadcom approximately 3.5 gigawatts as part of the multiple gigawatts of next generation TPU-based AI compute capacity committed by Anthropic.”

Wait…

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
We’re measuring CPUs in gigawatts, not megabytes or operations per second now? Dudes, the goal isn’t to waste as much energy as possible! That’s the most disgusting dick size measuring contest ever!

Billionares Using Our Resources to Replace People

By BrendaEM • Score: 3 Thread
AI has brought nothing good to the world.

“Revenue run rate” ?

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
What is this, News For Miserable Economists ?

“AI Overview
Revenue Run Rate
(RRR) is a financial metric that projects a company’s future annual revenue based on current, short-term performance (usually monthly or quarterly). It helps startups and rapidly growing companies estimate annual revenue by assuming current performance trends will remain consistent for a full year.”

Claude rules

By ZipNada • Score: 3 Thread

The Claude models are the best by far for coding assistance in my experience. Apparently a lot of other people think so too because Anthropic is getting swamped. They are having to ration out their compute resources and in some cases have raised their fees to 2-3 times more than the lesser competition charges. I’m finding that in order to keep costs down I’m having to use 2nd-tier models for simpler work and revert to Claude for the heavy lifting. A hassle.

Clearly the demand is there. At this point I expect Anthropic is revenue-limited by their infrastructure availability so it makes sense that they recruit the big players to help beef it up.

Cloudflare Fast-Tracks Post-Quantum Rollout To 2029

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Cloudflare is accelerating its post-quantum security plans and now aims to make its entire platform fully post-quantum secure by 2029. “The updated timeline follows new developments in quantum computing research that suggest current cryptographic standards could be broken sooner than previously expected,” reports SiliconANGLE. From the report:
The decision by Cloudflare to move its post-quantum security roadmap forward comes after Google LLC and research from Oratomic demonstrated significant advances in algorithms and hardware capable of breaking widely used encryption methods such as RSA-2048 and elliptic curve cryptography. […] The company said progress across three key areas — quantum hardware, error correction and quantum algorithms — is advancing in parallel and compounding overall capability. Improvements in areas such as neutral atom architectures and more efficient error correction are reducing the resources required to break encryption, while algorithmic advances are lowering computational complexity. […]

Cloudflare has already deployed post-quantum encryption across a large portion of its network and reports that more than half of human traffic it processes now uses post-quantum key agreement. The company plans to expand support for post-quantum authentication in 2026, followed by broader deployment across its network and products through 2028. By 2029, Cloudflare said, it expects all of its services to be fully post-quantum secure, with those services being available by default across its platform, without requiring customer action or additional cost as part of the company’s commitment to security upgrades.
Google said it plans to accelerate its post-quantum encryption migration target to 2029.

Re:Any best practices for personal crypto?

By Haydn • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I checked https://www.openssh.org/pq.html and they said that OpenSSH version 9.0 and greater solves this problem.

OpenSSH version 10.0 started warning users when connections use cryptography that is not safe against quantum computers.

They didn’t indicate that switching key types will fix anything, though I’m guessing that a newer/longer key might be better.
The important thing is to use a newer version of ssh on both ends of the connection.

Re:More of this

By outsider007 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Quantum Computing has been 10 years away for the past 30 years. But now it’s only 4 years away!!!

New Revelations Reignite Crypto Scandal Involving Argentina’s President Milei

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
President Javier Milei of Argentina promoted a cryptocurrency last year that quickly skyrocketed in value then cratered just as fast, costing investors millions of dollars and setting off a scandal and an investigation. Mr. Milei said he was simply highlighting a private venture and had no connection to the digital coin called $Libra. New evidence is now raising questions about his assertion. Phone logs from a federal investigation by Argentine prosecutors into the coin’s collapse show seven phone calls between Mr. Milei and one of the entrepreneurs behind the cryptocurrency on the night in 2025 when Mr. Milei posted about $Libra on X. The contents of the calls, which took place before and after Mr. Milei’s post, are not known.

But the phone logs — which were obtained by The New York Times and first reported by a local cable news channel, C5N — suggest a greater degree of communication between Mr. Milei and the entrepreneurs who launched the token than what the president has publicly acknowledged. Newly uncovered messages also suggest Mr. Milei received regular payments from one of the entrepreneurs while he was a congressman. Mr. Milei has not publicly commented on the call logs and other documents, and he did not respond to a request for comment. He is named as a person of interest in the federal prosecutor’s continuing investigation into the digital coin, according to court documents reviewed by The Times, but has not been formally charged with any crime. The latest revelations have revived a scandal that threatens the very foundation of a president who rose to power and was elected president in 2023 by attacking a political class he called corrupt.

Re:This is why Trump loves him.

By ndsurvivor • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Didn’t the Trump admin just give him something like 20 Billion Dollars?

Re:This is why Trump loves him.

By Luthair • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Corrupt together

Re:This is why Trump loves him.

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And who does Bessent work for? Do you really believe el Bunko didn’t sign off on it. I doubt it was his idea since he never has any original ideas of his own. Stop white washing el Bunko, everything he touches has the taint of corruption.

Re: This is why Trump loves him.

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You enjoying those gasoline prices?

Crypto Is For Crime!

By atrimtab • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Now with “wrench attacks” as XKCD informed us all of years ago.

Complete with wrench attack gangs whose real leaders are offshore directing their minions over phones using voice disguisers!

Just an added twist with all the crooked exchanges, holding companies and ATM machines.

Without strict world-wide regulation the only good move is not to play. Unless you run the the exchange and created the crypto.

Read how Crypto is the crime enabler: Number Go Up!