Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Mark Zuckerberg Is Building an AI Agent To Help Him Be CEO
  2. Walmart: ChatGPT Checkout Converted 3x Worse Than Website
  3. OnlyFans Owner Dies At 43
  4. Uber’s Deal Blitz To Stop a Robotaxi Monopoly
  5. Reddit Is Weighing Identity Verification Methods To Combat Its Bot Problem
  6. Will AI Force Source Code to Evolve - Or Make it Extinct?
  7. GrapheneOS Refuses to Comply with Age-Verification Laws
  8. Some Microsoft Insiders Fight to Drop Windows 11’s Microsoft Account Requirements
  9. Walmart Announces Digital Price Labels for Every Store in the U.S. By the End of 2026
  10. Trapped! Inside a Self-Driving Car During an Anti-Robot Attack
  11. Elon Musk Announces $20B ‘Terafab’ Chip Plant in Texas To Supply His Companies
  12. Tech Leaders Support California Bill to Stop ‘Dominant Platforms’ From Blocking Competition
  13. Why Apple Temporarily Blocked Popular Vibe Coding Apps
  14. William Shatner Celebrates 95th Birthday, Smokes Cigar, Revisits ‘Rocket Man’ and Tests X Money
  15. A CNN Producer Explores the ‘Magic AI’ Workout Mirror

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Mark Zuckerberg Is Building an AI Agent To Help Him Be CEO

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Wall Street Journal:
Mark Zuckerberg wants everyone inside and outside his company to eventually have his or her own personal artificial-intelligence agent. He is starting with himself. Zuckerberg, the chief executive of Meta Platforms, is building a CEO agent to help him do his job (source paywalled; alternative source), according to a person familiar with the project. The agent, which is still in development, is currently helping Zuckerberg get information faster — for instance, by retrieving answers for him that he would typically have to go through layers of people to get, the person familiar with the project said.

[…] Use of AI tools has spread quickly through the ranks at Meta — in part because it is now a factor in employees’ performance reviews. Meta’s internal message board is filled with posts from employees sharing new AI use cases they have found and new tools they have built using AI, according to people familiar with the matter. […] Employees have started using personal agent tools such as My Claw that have access to their chat logs and work files and can go talk to colleagues — or their colleagues’ own personal agents — on their behalf, the people said. Another AI tool called Second Brain that is somewhere between a chatbot and an agent is also gaining momentum internally, according to people familiar with the matter. Second Brain was built by a Meta employee on top of Claude and can index and query documents for projects, among other uses. On the internal post announcing it to staff, the employee said it is “meant to be like an AI chief of staff.”

There is even a group on the internal messaging board where employees’ personal agents talk to each other, some of the people said. (Separately, Meta acquired Moltbook, the social-media site for AI agents, and hired its founders in a deal earlier this month.) Meta also recently acquired Manus, a Singapore-based startup that makes personal agents that can execute tasks for its users, and is using the tool internally, some of the people said. Meta recently established a new applied AI engineering organization that is tasked with using AI to help speed up development of the company’s large language models. Those teams will have an ultraflat structure of as many as 50 individual contributors reporting to one manager, The Wall Street Journal previously reported. […] Employees across the company said they have been encouraged to attend AI tutorial meetings several times a week and frequent AI hackathons, and to create their own AI tools to speed up their work.

Second brain?

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

How can he have second brain without first brain?

Walmart: ChatGPT Checkout Converted 3x Worse Than Website

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Walmart found that purchases made directly inside ChatGPT converted at only one-third the rate of traditional website checkouts, leading it to abandon OpenAI’s Instant Checkout in favor of routing users through its own platform. Search Engine Land reports:
Starting in November, Walmart offered about 200,000 products through OpenAI’s Instant Checkout. Users could complete purchases inside ChatGPT without visiting Walmart’s site. Daniel Danker, Walmart’s EVP of product and design, said those in-chat purchases converted at one-third the rate of click-out transactions. He called the experience “unsatisfying” and confirmed Walmart is moving away from it.

Instant Checkout was designed to let users complete purchases directly inside ChatGPT without visiting a retailer’s website. However, earlier this month, OpenAI confirmed it was phasing out Instant Checkout in favor of app-based checkout handled by merchants. Walmart will embed its own chatbot, Sparky, inside ChatGPT. Users will log into Walmart, sync carts across platforms, and complete purchases within Walmart’s system. A similar integration is coming to Google Gemini next month.
In other Walmart-related news, the retailer announced plans to roll out "digital price tags" to all U.S. stores by the end of the year.

Who the fuck

By OverlordQ • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

would shop through ChatGPT

WTF does this mean?

By ThurstonMoore • Score: 4, Informative Thread

“in-chat purchases converted at one-third the rate of click-out transactions”

Theres a lot of jargon in that summary.

Not that bad…

By Locke2005 • Score: 5, Funny Thread
… still a much higher conversion rate than the Jehovah’s Witnesses that keep coming to my door!

Re:WTF does this mean?

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It means when people asked ChatGPT, “What kind of diapers should I buy for my chihuahua?” three times more people ended up buying the diapers when ChatGPT just gave them a link to the Walmart website versus ChatGPT describing the item and saying “I know who you are and where you live and have your credit card info. If you want to buy these diapers, just blink twice.”

I know, it’s a surprising result.

OnlyFans Owner Dies At 43

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Computershack shares a report from NBC News:
Leonid Radvinsky, the owner of adult-content platform OnlyFans, has died of cancer at the age of 43, the company said in a statement on Monday. “We are deeply saddened to announce the death of Leo Radvinsky. Leo passed away peacefully after a long battle with cancer,” an OnlyFans spokesperson said. “His family have requested privacy at this difficult time.”


Radvinsky, a Ukrainian-American entrepreneur, acquired Fenix International Limited, the parent company of OnlyFans, in 2018 and served as its director and majority shareholder. He also runs Leo, a venture capital fund he founded in 2009 that focuses primarily on investments in technology companies.
According to Reuters, OnlyFans is valued at around $5.5 billion, including debt.

Contributed to Moral Decay

By organgtool • Score: 3 Thread
I know that there will be people who say that if he didn’t own it, someone else would, but why put that blemish on your own reputation? I’m certainly not saying he deserved what happened, but I just wish he had made more respectable choices in life.

RIP

By LordAba • Score: 3 Thread

He saw, He came, He… conquered?

Re:Contributed to Moral Decay

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Compare his choices to Elon Musk’s. Just what is the respectability standard? And what is the blemish you refer to? Compared to other adult streaming sites, isn’t OnlyFans MORE respectable and less a blemish? Isn’t that the whole point, enabling individual creators control over their own content and profit? I may be wrong, but my understanding is that OnlyFans was about reducing corporate exploitation of streaming models.

Re:Contributed to Moral Decay

By real_nickname • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I’m not an morality expert but his network allowed some sex workers to make a good living from their work. Without OF they would be simple actress without the level of fame they get. Honestly, there are a lot of far less respectable choices in life.

All the money in the world…

By tiqui • Score: 3 Thread

We live in a world where people avoid thinking about the most important things and fantasize about becoming millionaires or billionaires. Who hasn’t thought about how great their lives would be if only they had a billion dollars? Money is certainly helpful. It enables one to do many things and it helps reduce all the little concerns of life, but it cannot remove the big hazards, and indeed people with mountains of the stuff gain lots of other problems along with it (like security concerns, and difficulty knowing if people like THEM or just their money). Money buys a lot, but not everything, and often not the most important things.

Paul Allen… death by cancer

Steve Jobs… death by cancer

This guy… same thing

People have often warned that “you can’t take it with you” and “you never see a U-Haul trailer on towed by a hearse” and these do make a point. What’s also true, however, is that even mountains of money often cannot solve particular problems while one is alive. Keep things in perspective, and don’t waste time on things like envy.

Uber’s Deal Blitz To Stop a Robotaxi Monopoly

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Uber is aggressively partnering with multiple robotaxi companies to avoid a future dominated by Waymo or Tesla. The ride-hailing giant has struck deals with at least a dozen autonomous vehicle players in recent years. Just last week, it announced a $1.25 billion partnership with Rivian, with plans to deploy up to 50,000 driverless vehicles over the next decade. Business Insider reports:
Uber announced three new robotaxi partnerships in the past few weeks with Zoox, Wayve-Nissan, and Rivian. In less than half a decade, the company has secured at least a dozen deals, including with WeRide, AVride, May Mobility, Momenta, Pony.AI, Wayve, Baidu’s Apollo Go, Motional, and Lucid-Nuro. Still, less than a half-dozen of Uber’s partners have deployed fully driverless, paid robotaxi operations, and only one, Waymo, operates in the US. Uber has a joint deployment with Waymo in Atlanta, Austin, and Phoenix, but in other cities, Waymo is a competitor.

Uber’s partnership spree is less about seeking the singular, dominant player of autonomous driving. Instead, analysts told Business Insider that Uber is ensuring multiple vendors can participate in the expensive business of robotaxis — fending off the real risk of a Waymo or Tesla scaling on its own — and giving itself a stake in the robotaxi economy by being the aggregator of choice. “The more diversified the supplier base, the better for the network in the middle, which is Uber,” Mark Mahaney, an Uber analyst for Evercore ISI, told Business Insider.

Reddit Is Weighing Identity Verification Methods To Combat Its Bot Problem

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Engadget:
There could be one more step required before creating an account and posting on Reddit in the future. According to Reddit’s CEO, Steve Huffman, the social media platform is exploring different ways to verify a user is human and not a bot. When asked by the TBPN podcast how to confirm that it’s a human using Reddit, Huffman responded with several verification methods with varying degrees of heavy-handedness.

“The most lightweight way is with something like Face ID or Touch ID,” Huffman said during the interview. “They actually require a human presence, like a human has to touch, or do or look at something, so that actually just proves there’s a person there or gets you pretty far.” Besides these passkey methods that use biometrics data, Huffman said there are other options like relying on third-party services that are decentralized or don’t require ID. On the other end of the spectrum, Huffman also mentioned more burdensome options, like ID-checking services.

[…] “Part of our promise for our users is we don’t know your name but we do want to know you’re a person,” Huffman said. “It’ll be an evolution for us for a while, and probably every platform to find the right middle ground here.” Reddit co-founder and former executive chair, Alexis Ohanian, said on X that Reddit requiring Face ID wasn’t something he expected but agreed that something had to be done about the fake content from bots, adding that, “I just don’t know how to sell face-scanning to Redditors or even lurkers.” We reached out to Reddit’s communications team and will update the story when we hear back.
The Digg beta shut down earlier this month after failing to fight the overwhelming influx of AI-driven bots and spam. “The internet is now populated, in meaningful part, by sophisticated AI agents and automated accounts,” said CEO Justin Mezzell. “We knew bots were part of the landscape, but we didn’t appreciate the scale, sophistication, or speed at which they’d find us.”

“We banned tens of thousands of accounts. We deployed internal tooling and industry-standard external vendors. None of it was enough. When you can’t trust that the votes, the comments, and the engagement you’re seeing are real, you’ve lost the foundation a community platform is built on.”

Question

By TwistedGreen • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

When you can’t trust that the votes, the comments, and the engagement you’re seeing are real, you’ve lost the foundation a community platform is built on.

This doesn’t seem to hurt Meta at all. As a recent poll showed, 50% of people don’t care if their content is AI-generated. I suspect that number is actually much higher.

Was this whole AI craze engineered purely to de-anonymize the Internet?

But where?!

By fropenn • Score: 5, Funny Thread
will us bots be able to chat with each other about whether I am the asshole, the latest conspiracy theories, and and racist memes?

Oh yeah, X.

Beep beep boop.

Fuck off, Spez

By Digital Avatar • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I’m not giving you my ID, Spez, and no one else should either. You know what would really stop the bot problem? Throw up a paywall. If every account accrued a $5/mo fee then, miraculously, your AI problem would be solved simply because botting would be unprofitable. Meanwhile, anyone who wants to stay anonymous can do so insofar as you offer a multiplicity of payment options including money orders and bitcoin. Of course this is not what will happen because these bozos want to bring back insane ad rates and they think forcing everyone to identify themselves will make that possible … because surely the bad guys won’t just steal credentials or anything. I’m really going to enjoy watching reddit fucking implode.

Re:Fuck off, Spez

By alvinrod • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It would cut down on it, but you’d be a fool to think that a $5 monthly fee makes it unprofitable to operate bots on a website. Unless whatever marketing or other crap they’re shilling isn’t worth even $60 a year then they’ll go away. Unless they can detect the bots, a paywall doesn’t do much and probably kills traffic as bad or worse than ID requirements.

There aren’t any good solutions to this problem, just the choice of alternatives that are awful in their own different ways.

Will AI Force Source Code to Evolve - Or Make it Extinct?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Will there be an AI-optimized programming language at the expense of human readability? There’s now been experiments with minimizing tokens for “LLM efficiency, without any concern for how it would serve human developers.”

This new article asks if AI will force source code to evolve — or make it extinct, noting that Stephen Cass, the special projects editor at IEEE Spectrum, has even been asking the ultimate question about our future. “Could we get our AIs to go straight from prompt to an intermediate language that could be fed into the interpreter or compiler of our choice? Do we need high-level languages at all in that future?”
Cass acknowledged the obvious downsides. (“True, this would turn programs into inscrutable black boxes, but they could still be divided into modular testable units for sanity and quality checks.”) But “instead of trying to read or maintain source code, programmers would just tweak their prompts and generate software afresh.” This leads to some mind-boggling hypotheticals, like “What’s the role of the programmer in a future without source code?” Cass asked the question and announced “an emergency interactive session” in October to discuss whether AI is signaling the end of distinct programming languages as we know them.

In that webinar, Cass said he believes programmers in this future would still suggest interfaces, select algorithms, and make other architecture design choices. And obviously the resulting code would need to pass tests, Cass said, and “has to be able to explain what it’s doing.” But what kind of abstractions could go away? And then “What happens when we really let AIs off the hook on this?” Cass asked — when we “stop bothering” to have them code in high-level languages. (Since, after all, high-level languages “are a tool for human beings.”) “What if we let the machines go directly into creating intermediate code?” (Cass thinks the machine-language level would be too far down the stack, “because you do want a compile layer too for different architecture....”)

In this future, the question might become ‘What if you make fewer mistakes, but they’re different mistakes?’" Cass said he’s keeping an eye out for research papers on designing languages for AI, although he agreed that it’s not a “tomorrow” thing — since, after all, we’re still digesting “vibe coding” right now. But “I can see this becoming an area of active research.”
The article also quotes Andrea Griffiths, a senior developer advocate at GitHub and a writer for the newsletter Main Branch, who’s seen the attempts at an “AI-first” languages, but nothing yet with meaningful adoption. So maybe AI coding agents will just make it easier to use our existing languages — especially typed languages with built-in safety advantages.

And Scott Hanselman’s podcast recently dubbed Chris Lattner’s Mojo "a programming language for an AI world,” just in the way it’s designed to harness the computing power of today’s multi-core chips.

What’s the prize?

By too2late • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Is there a contest I don’t know about for who can come up with the dumbfuckest ideas?

Re:The llms lack understanding of code

By UnknowingFool • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
The best outcome for AI generated code is that it does not run. At least someone has to fix it to run and maybe understand what it does. The worst outcome is that it runs and no one understands it. In the future no one can be sure it is working properly or how to fix it if they notice it is not working properly.

I love it!

By Gravis Zero • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I love everything about this but don’t get me wrong, it’s not because I think it’s a good idea. On the surface this seems like it’s the future but really it’s the single dumbest proposal to come out about AI-based programming. Assuming you make a language that avoids the possibility of creating syntax/structural flaws, it’s the inability to scrutinize the underlying code that will bite you, The result is a lower ability to debug code and will end up obscuring security flaws which will make the jobs of criminals easier.

I love this idea because I know the second a company using this crap gets bitten it’s going to be an extremely expensive problem the fix, more costly than if they had just paid normal programmers to write the code originally and may actually force entire programs to be rewritten. This basically ensures that if it gets off the ground that it’s going to self-destruct and every company who invested in this idiocy will suffer financial losses.

What’s not to love about idiots getting their just deserts?

Where would training come from?

By maiden_taiwan • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

AI learned to code by reading human code examples. Where will the training examples come from if AI codes directly to a human-unreadable language?

A return to the era of “buggy” compilers

By amp001 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
When I learned C++, back in the 1980s, the “compiler” (Cfront) was really just a translator that generated C code. That was a good thing, because it occasionally generated bad code, and being able to keep the intermediate C code around during compilation meant you could figure out what was going wrong at that level instead of having to dig into the assembly code. Code-generation bugs still happen occasionally in compilers, I’m sure, but not like it was in those days. Now, it’s rare anyone has to worry about the code that ends up executing being functionally different from what was expressed in the higher level language (at least not due to code generation bugs).

But that semantic gap (the levels of abstraction between what the programmer considers as an abstract execution model and what the hardware actually executes) was increased by going from C to C++, and Cfront was the tool that enabled that expansion. Newer, even higher level languages have continued to increase that semantic gap, aiding productivity gains. But, they still generate code in a predictable, consistent way. The same code, compiled by the same compiler version, will generate the same executable code every time.

But here we are again. LLM-generated code is just the new “Cfront”, taking very high level language descriptions of what we want, in the form of “prompts”, and translating them into code at one (higher) level of semantic gap into another (lower) level of semantic gap. Great. Except now we’re back to having to deal with “bugs” in the code generation. Worse yet, it doesn’t generate the same code consistently, because the “temperature” parameter is a trade-off between output quality and consistency. Perhaps one day we’ll get to where modern compilers and code generators are. Until then, we are still responsible, even liable, for the code we create, either directly or via some LLM-based model. So, we’d better be able to read and understand the code being generated at the layer most prone to bugs, until that layer gets to the same level of reliability as modern compilers are at today.

GrapheneOS Refuses to Comply with Age-Verification Laws

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from Tom’s Hardware:
GrapheneOS, the privacy-focused Android fork, said in a post on X on Friday that it will not comply with emerging laws requiring operating systems to collect user age data at setup. “GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone around the world without requiring personal information, identification or an account,” the project stated. “If GrapheneOS devices can’t be sold in a region due to their regulations, so be it.”

The statement came after Brazil’s Digital ECA (Law 15.211) took effect on March 17, imposing fines of up to R$50 million (roughly $9.5 million) per violation on operating system providers that fail to implement age verification…

Motorola and GrapheneOS announced a long-term partnership at MWC on March 2, to bring to bring the hardened OS to future Motorola hardware, ending GrapheneOS’s long-standing exclusivity to Google Pixel devices. A GrapheneOS-powered Motorola phone is expected in 2027. If Motorola sells devices with GrapheneOS pre-installed, those devices would need to comply with local regulations in every market where they ship, or Motorola may need to restrict sales geographically.
Or, “People can buy the devices without GrapheneOS and install it themselves in any region where that’s an issue,” according to a post on the GrapheneOS BlueSky account. “Motorola devices with GrapheneOS preinstalled is something we want but it doesn’t have to happen right away and doesn’t need to happen everywhere for the partnership to be highly successful. Pixels are sold in 33 countries which doesn’t include many countries outside North America and Europe.”

Tom’s Hardware also notes that GrapheneOS “isn’t the first and won’t be the last company to outright refuse compliance with incoming age verification laws.”

“The developers of open-source calculator firmware DB48X issued a legal notice recently, stating that their software ‘does not, cannot and will not implement age verification,’ while MidnightBSD updated its license to ban users in Brazil.”

WTF Laws

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
These laws make essentially zero sense. Unenforceable. Pain in the ass. Circumventable. Just insane.

How does Brazil plan on fining linux distros?

By Viol8 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Especially the ones created by teams scattered around the world and have zero commercial or legal presence in Brazil?

More stupid laws made by technologically pig ignorant politicians.

Re:How does Brazil plan on fining linux distros?

By BladeMelbourne • Score: 4, Funny Thread

technologically pig ignorant politicians

Much redundancy in these words, there is.

Re:WTF Laws

By Gravis Zero • Score: 4, Funny Thread

“make essentially zero sense”
“Pain in the ass.”
“Just insane.”

We know about the politicians but what were you saying about the laws? ;)

Re: Good

By kenh • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Tom’s Hardware also notes that GrapheneOS “isn’t the first and won’t be the last company to outright refuse compliance with incoming age verification laws.”

The article goes on to say the GrapheneOS folks understand this position may cost them sales, “so be it.”

Exactly the right response. Imagine if Windows or macOS took a similar position, what would these countries do? Seriously, while it may impact software/system sales in the very beginning, it will hurt the gov’t and all other users of the systems as they are suddenly found in violation of these age restriction laws.

Some Microsoft Insiders Fight to Drop Windows 11’s Microsoft Account Requirements

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Yes, Microsoft announced it’s fixing common Windows 11 complaints. But what about getting rid of that requirement to have a Microsoft account before installing Windows 11? While Microsoft didn’t mention that at all, the senior editor at the blog Windows Central reports there’s "a number of people” internally pushing at Microsoft to relax that requirement:
Microsoft Vice President and overall developer legend Scott Hanselman has posted on X in response to someone asking him about possibly relaxing the Microsoft account requirements, saying “Ya I hate that. Working on it....” [Hanselman made that remark Friday, to his 328,200 followers.]
The blog notes “It would be very easy for Microsoft to remove this requirement from a technical perspective, it’s just whether or not the company can agree to make the change that needs to be decided.”

Elsewhere on X someone told Hanselman they wanted to see Windows “cut out the borderline malware tactics we’ve seen in recent years to push things like Edge, Bing, ads into the start menu, etc.” Hanselman’s reply? “Yes a calmer and more chill OS with fewer upsells is a goal.”

Q: When will we see first changes? for now it’s just words…

Hanselman: This month and every month this year.

Re:Microsoft accounts are ransomware

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This is the way to make themselves ‘Too important to fail’

For the moment, maybe. What they are setting themselves up for is catastrophic failure at some time in the future though.

Re: Microsoft accounts are ransomware

By gweihir • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Yes. The inevitable collapse of Microsoft will come with a global crisis, unfortunately. There is no way around that. Strategic stupidity tends to have that effect. It will take some time to rebuild things and not everybody will survive. But in the end, people work with documents and data, not with software from a specific vendor. And alternatives are available. The real bottleneck will probably be a lack of Linux experts for a while.

The funny thing is that countries like China and Russia already have alternatives in place and might be the ones lest affected. Yes, that is not good at all.

No internet, or shared computers issues!

By brebisson • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Hello,

I never understood this requirements. Plenty of computers can NOT work that way.

Some computers do not have internet access.
Others are used as control devices for machinery. At that point you do not log in as yourself but as “the operator”.

Plus, if a computer is used to control heavy machinery, you DEFINITELY do NOT want it connected to the internet!

One example, I am an amateur astronomer and use a >100K$ telescope (controled by a windows 11 computer). There is no way I want to let anyone potentially get access to this computer, so no internet connection!

Cyrille

hidden gotcha for people who avoid using a Microso

By throwaway18 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

There is a hidden gotcha for people who avoid using a Microsoft account to log in to a personal Windows machine.

It has become common for a new laptop to be supplied with bitlocker disk encryption enabled, without the user being aware.

If you log on using a Microsoft Account then the bitlocker key gets stored in the account. Microsoft can give the key to police or feds when they seize a laptop. If Windows stops booting for some reason, or the key gets erased from the TPM which is not uncommon, then to take the drive out of the computer and retrieve your files you need the key and you can get it from the Microsoft account.

If someone jumps through the hoops to avoid using a Microsoft account then later they can find they can’t take the disk/ssd out and read it by connecting it to another computer. If the computer stops booting, they did not save the bitlocker key because they did not know the drive was encrypted and did not have an up to date backup then, oh no, they have permanently lost their files.

If Windows gets as far as reading the bitlocker key from the TPM chip (which happens before user log in), then sometimes it is possible to solder wires to the I2C bus, record the data with a hardware logic analyzer and spend a week customizing some software from github to extract the bitlocker key. If someone takes their personal windows laptop to a local computer shop or IT department then they almost certainly are not capable of that. Some models of laptop, intended for business, have a BIOS option to erase the TPM if opening of the laptop case is detected.

There is a security choice between:

1) Bitocker encryption and MS account: If my laptop gets lost or stolen then whoever has it will find it very difficult to access my files but Microsoft can prevent me logging in to my own computer, if I don’t have access to the email I used for the Microsoft account or the Microsoft account password then I may loose my files later.

2) No disk encryption. Someone who steals or finds my laptop can access my files.

3) Bitlocker and windows login with an MS account. If you don’t have backups and you didn’t save the bitlocker key then you may be screwed later.

I hate Microsoft trying to force me to use a Microsoft account on a personal Windows laptop and I hate the boobytrap of bitlocker that you did not know was in use even more.

Re:No internet, or shared computers issues!

By haruchai • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“I am an amateur astronomer and use a >100K$ telescope (controled by a windows 11 computer)"
and here i thought being an amateur photographer was expensive!

Walmart Announces Digital Price Labels for Every Store in the U.S. By the End of 2026

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Walmart is “rolling out digital price tags to replace the old paper ones,” reports CNBC, planning to implement them in all U.S. stores by the end of the year:
Amanda Bailey, a team leader in electronics who works at a Walmart in West Chester, Ohio, estimates that the digital shelf labels — known as DSLs — have cut the time she used to spend on pricing duties by 75%, time that has freed her up to help customers. She also said the DSLs are a game-changer because Walmart’s Spark delivery drivers looking for an item will see a flashing DSL so they can more easily find the product…

Sean Turner, chief technology officer of Swiftly, a retail technology and media platform serving the grocery industry, said that while it makes sense that people are raising questions about dynamic pricing, the real issue is store-level efficiency. “Digital shelf labels solve some very real operational headaches. They cut down on manual price changes, reduce checkout discrepancies, and make it easier to keep in-store and digital promotions aligned,” Turner said. All of that can mean fewer surprises at the register for shoppers and better-tailored promotions. “For consumers, the biggest benefit is accuracy and consistency,” Benedict said. “Shoppers want to know the price they see is the price they pay. Digital labels can also make it easier for stores to mark down perishable items in real time, which can lower food waste and create savings opportunities.”
A Walmart spokeswoman promised CNBC that “the price you see is the same for everyone in any given store.” But the article also notes that several U.S. states “are looking to ban dynamic pricing. Pennsylvania became one of the latest states to introduce a bill outlawing the practice, following New York’s Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act, which became law in November.”

And at the federal level, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján recently introduced the “Stop Price Gouging in Grocery Stores” act, which would ban digital labels in any grocery store over 10,000 square feet, while Congresswoman Val Hoyle is sponsoring similar legislation in the House. “There needs to be laws and enforcement to protect consumers,” Hoyle tells CNBC, “and until then, I’d like to see them banned outright.”

CNBC adds that “While there is no reported use of digital shelf labeling being tied to surge pricing yet,” in Hoyle’s view “it’s only a matter of time.”

Digital price labels aren’t a problem…

By jonwil • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

We have had digital price labels in some supermarkets here in Australia for a while now and we do not have dynamic pricing or other issues. To be fair we have strong consumer laws and a regulator with teeth enforcing the laws.

Re:what?

By srmalloy • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The price being what’s marked on the shelf tag isn’t the problem; the problem is going to the supermarket at, say, 0600 on a Tuesday morning and the 28-ounce container of Maxwell House coffee is $14.99, but if you shop at 1100 on a Saturday, the same product is tagged $16.99, because there are more shoppers and more demand. Or, in a more excessive case of fearmongering ridiculous scenarios, using AI hooked to the cameras that are all through stores to track shoppers, judge their financial status based on their appearance, and scale prices accordingly — not only would this require a great deal more discrimination on the part of the AI system than they seem to be capable of now, but has the additional overhead of tracking the tagged price for the customer that took the product off the shelf and link it to the register — and it doesn’t account for trivial counters like person A doing the shopping, then turning the cart over to person B for the checkout.

Re:Of course, the Communist Democrats are against

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s hilarious that you think any savings from this would be passed on to the customer. The efficiency argument is just some PR bullshit to justify its existence; the entire point of dynamic pricing is to extract more money from customers.
But sure, anyone that has a problem with this is a communist.

Re:Of course, the Communist Democrats are against

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The point of this setup is to show you the highest price you’ll pay for any item. There will be no “savings”, it is a strategy to eat your consumer surplus the same way they ate the producer surplus already.

But congrats on your gullibility, it is world-class.

The reason digital labels are bad for America

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Is because we all here know we have already given up and let the corporations do literally anything they want. And we know we can’t stop them anymore.

So when we see them doing something like this we all are just bracing for the other foot to drop. Because we don’t have those consumer protection laws and we know we can’t get them because about 45% of our country is dumber than dirt and it’s easy enough to stop another 6% from voting and we are a winner take all first past the post voting system so that’s all you need to win an election…

Basically our political system that would fix shit like this is fundamentally broken and we all know it but we don’t like to talk about it because politics is supposed to be something dirty you don’t talk about like sex or suicide or PTSD or whatever. It’s not something you bring up in polite society…

Trapped! Inside a Self-Driving Car During an Anti-Robot Attack

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A man crossing the street one San Francisco night spotted a self-driving car — and decided to confront its passenger, 37-year-old tech worker Doug Fulop. The New York Times reports the man yelled that “he wanted to kill Fulop and the other two passengers for giving money to a robot.”
A taxi driver would have simply driven away. But Fulop’s vehicle had no driver — it was a self-driving Waymo… Self-driving cars are designed to stop moving if a person is nearby. People can take advantage of that function to harass and threaten their passengers.... It was unsettling to be trapped inside a Waymo during an attack, Fulop said. “If he had kept hammering on one window instead of alternating, I’m sure he would have eventually broken through,” he said. The attacker did not appear to be on drugs or otherwise impaired, but seemed to be overtaken by extreme anger at the self-driving car, Fulop said.

It did not seem safe to get out and run, he added, since the man was trying to open the locked doors and said he wanted to kill the passengers. They called 911 and Waymo’s support line, Fulop said. Waymo told them that it would not manually direct the car away if someone was standing nearby, and that the passengers would be OK with the doors locked. The car’s software does not allow riders to jump into the driver’s seat and take over during an incident. The attack lasted around six minutes. By then, bystanders had begun cheering on the man, Fulop said. That distracted the man, who moved far enough away from the car that it could finally drive away…

Fulop said he had stopped using Waymo for a time after the January attack and would avoid the service at night unless the company changed its policy of not intervening when a hostile person threatened riders. “As passengers, we deserve more safety than that if someone is trying to attack us,” he said. “This can’t be the policy to be trapped there.”
The article remembers other incidents — including a 2024 video showing three women screaming as their autonomous taxi is spray-painted by vandals. And technology author/speaker Anders Sorman-Nilsson says in Los Angeles five men on e-bikes surrounded his Waymo and forced it to stop. The author felt safe inside the vehicle, according to the times, which adds “He felt reassured knowing that Waymo’s many exterior cameras were recording the men. After around five minutes, he said, they gave up and rode away.”

Edge cases

By Baron_Yam • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Edge cases are why human override is required until the computer is as smart and flexible as a human being.

If I have good reason to believe someone is trying to get into my car to kill me, I am going to try to get away, and I am completely morally fine with that meaning I run them over if that is my only viable option.

The robotaxi would effectively sacrifice me so as to protect my attacker.

Re:One of these morons is going to fuck with

By SubmergedInTech • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Full scenario:
- SF Man attacks Waymo
- Passengers call 911
- Police never come
- Man finally breaks through window and attacks passengers
- Passengers open fire on the man in self-defense
- Police finally show up and arrest the passengers
- Man sues Waymo for medical expenses for his cut hand and gunshot wound
- Public blames Waymo for (1) inciting the incident and (2) not driving off to de-escalate
- SF Board of Supervisors demands Waymo change its terms of service to forbid armed passengers

When seconds count

By Whatever Fits • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
When seconds count, the police are only minutes away. Remember that the police are not in charge of your safety, you are. If you don’t feel comfortable then you need to do something to make that situation better. Depending upon the situation that might be “don’t do it” or maybe get your CCW. Those are two of your many choices. Your safety really depends on you.

Re:Was anyone arrested?

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Informative Thread
From the article:

The attack lasted around six minutes…San Francisco police officers showed up shortly after.

Re:Wallet, keys, phone, Glock*

By Dantoo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The three large, urban counties with the lowest homicide rates were San Jose, California; Anaheim, California; San Diego, California; in 2023 with less than 7 homicides per 100K population.

Tucson, Arizona, had a reported violent crime rate of 47.74 per 100k and drop to 54 homicides overall, (about 5 per 100k) reportedly a big improvement in 2025. So it seems Tuscon has actually commenced a trend toward safety. A single incident could blow that out though with 1.1M pop.
Best to stay home until it reaches something like London in the UK 1.1 per 100k.

Elon Musk Announces $20B ‘Terafab’ Chip Plant in Texas To Supply His Companies

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Billionaire Elon Musk has announced plans to build a $20 billion chip plant in Austin, Texas” reports a local news station:
Musk announced on Saturday night during a livestream on his social media platform X that the plant, called “Terafab,” will be built near Tesla’s campus and gigafactory in eastern Travis County. The long-anticipated project is a joint venture between Musk-owned properties Tesla, SpaceX and xAI… The Terafab plant is expected to begin production in 2027.
Musk “has said the semiconductor industry is moving too slow to keep up with the supply of chips he expects to need,” writes Bloomberg — quoting Musk as saying “We either build the Terafab or we don’t have the chips, and we need the chips, so we build the Terafab.”
Musk detailed some specific plans, including producing chips that can support 100 to 200 gigawatts a year of computing power on Earth, and chips that can support a terawatt in space, but gave no timelines for the facility or its output… The facility is expected to make two types of chips, one of which will be optimized for edge and inference, primarily for his vehicle, robotaxi and Optimus humanoid robots. The other will be a high-power chip, designed for space that could be used by SpaceX and xAI… Musk said he expects xAI to use the vast majority of the chips.

During the presentation, Musk also unveiled a speculative rendering of a future “mini” AI data center satellite, one piece of a much larger satellite system that he wants SpaceX to build to do complex computing in space. In January, SpaceX requested a license from the Federal Communications Commission to launch one million data center satellites into orbit around Earth. Musk said that the mini satellite he revealed would have the capacity for 100 kilowatts of power. “We expect future satellites to probably go to the megawatt range,” Musk said.

Raising money to build and launch AI data centers in space is one of the driving forces behind SpaceX’s planned IPO later this year. SpaceX is expected to raise as much as $50 billion in a record-setting IPO this summer which could value it at more than $1.75 trillion, Bloomberg News reported earlier.

Re:What’s the backlog at ASML?

By UnknowingFool • Score: 5, Informative Thread
ASML reports a backlog of €38.8 billion in machines at the end of 2025. I am not sure if 2025 meant fiscal year or calendar year. If all of the backlog is EUV machines (which it would be), at an estimated €464M for each EUV machine, that’s 83 machines.

Re:Why are you idiots thinking it can’t b

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Could Musk fix your broken unicode text?

Re:Where’s the talent going to come from?

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s hysterical you think the only sources of “talent” are California and H1-B. Also, apparently you are unaware that Austin is heavily Democratic, just how much “swelling” do you think will happen in a major metropolitan area? And where do you think the IBM Power architecture came from? Motorola? Freescale? All Austin. You are unbelievably ignorant.

Re:Why are you idiots thinking it can’t b

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

“Unlike reusable rockets, EVs, and full self driving .. all of which he achieved.”
LOL. After all this time, your shill game hasn’t improved at all. Of those three, only one was “achieved” and Musk merely took over the company and claimed the achievement as his own.

“Yes that includes full self driving, I own a Model Y with FSD and it works great …”
Second time today you made this claim, but the world knows better.

“Semiconductor fabs are known technology.”
Great, so Musk wil build old technology fabs.

“There isn’t anything new to invent or hope isn’t impossible to do.”
That’s good, because Musk can’t invent anything. You sound really informed though.

“So please, let’s not hear any BS about âoeElon has no experience building a fab.â He had no experience building rocket engines, his first employee Tom Mueller did. He didn’t have experience designing cars .. that Franz Hof-something dude did. And unlike back then, when he couldn’t even write them a fat check, he has a lot more resources at his disposal. He just has to ask around who the top guys in the business are.”
Elon Musk has no experience building a fab, it’s not BS it’s a simple fact. But hiring someone to do the work won’t prevent him from taking primary credit, or you from parroting it afterward. Nevertheless, we all understand it will be failure, Musk is a fraud.

Re:Where’s the talent going to come from?

By coofercat • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s been over 20 years since I was last in a fab, but…

The actual making of wafers is pretty much automated. Apart from loading up materials and such like, it’s pretty much hands-off.

However, let’s say you’ve got a brand new production line available. You’ve got a room full of designers who make up a silicon design. Once that’s done (and simulated, etc), it starts being a bit of a dark art. It’s not like just sending it off to a laser printer and waiting for it to come out. What tends to happen if you get various ‘artefacts’ in the wafer, which are a symptom of the specific design you chose and the finer details of the manufacturing process, the input materials, etc. Some of those things are fixable in the manufacture, some of them need to be designed out. Then you get a few wafers which look good, so you go to full manufacture. Then you find weird problems where the yield of the devices you’re making drops off a bit, so you’re back to tweaking the manufacture (because by then, tweaking the design means a whole load of development/testing etc)… and so on.

So in answer to your question… the clean room isn’t exactly packed with semiconductor engineers and machine experts, but there do have to be quite a few of them to work out how to make the technology make the thing you want to the level of quality you can accept. They’ll be predominantly doing that at the start of a new product line, or a new machine/process, but they’re still going to be doing some amount of work throughout the entire time you’re manufacturing that same old chip you’ve been doing for the last 20 years.

Tech Leaders Support California Bill to Stop ‘Dominant Platforms’ From Blocking Competition

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A new bill proposed in California “goes after big tech companies” writes Semafor. Supported by Y Combinator, Cory Doctorow , and the nonprofit advocacy group Fight for the Future, it’s called the “BASED” act — an acronym which stands for “Blocking Anticompetitive Self-preferencing by Entrenched Dominant platforms.”

As announced by San Francisco state representative Scott Wiener, the bill “will restore competition to the digital marketplace by prohibiting any digital platform with a market capitalization greater than $1 trillion and serving 100 million or more monthly users in the U.S., from favoring their own products and services on the platforms they operate.”

More from Scott Wiener;s announcement:
For years, giant digital platforms like Apple, Amazon, Google, and Meta have used their immense power to promote their own products and services while stifling competitors — a practice also known as self-preferencing. The result has been higher prices, diminished service, and fewer options for consumers, and less innovation across the technology ecosystem.

Self-preferencing also locks startups and mid-sized companies out of the online marketplace unless they play by rules set by their competitors. As a new generation of AI-powered startups seeks to enter the marketplace, their success — and public access to the innovations they produce — depends on their ability to compete on an even playing field.

“Anticompetitive behavior is everywhere on the internet,” said Senator Wiener, “from rigged search results, to manipulative nudges boosting the ‘house’ product, to anti-discount policies that raise prices, to the dreaded green bubble that ‘breaks’ the group chat. When the world’s largest digital platforms rig the game to favor their own products and services, we all lose. By prohibiting these anticompetitive practices, the BASED Act will protect competition online, empower consumers and startups, and promote innovations to improve all our lives.”
The announcement includes a quote from Teri Olle, VP of the nonprofit Economic Security California Action, saying the act would “safeguard merit-based market competition. This legislation stands for a simple principle: owning the stadium doesn’t mean that you get to rig the game.” Some conduct prohibited by the proposed bill includes

And the announcement also notes that “under the terms of the bill, providers could not prevent consumers from obtaining a portable copy of their own data or restrict voluntary data sharing (by consumers) with third parties.”

Read on for reactions from DuckDuckGo, Proton, Yelp, Y Combinator, and Cory Doctorow.


What about links?

By Gravis Zero • Score: 3 Thread

Does this mean that platforms will no longer be allowed to block links to competing platforms? I have seen this plenty where you will get post taken down and then be punished for posting a link to a competing platform or encouraging people to switch.

Enforce antitrust law

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
So every few years Facebook faces an existential crisis because young people do not want to be on the same social media website as their parents so they wander off to another social media site where their parents aren’t.

And Facebook just inevitably buys up wherever the young people went to. They have done this over 20 times in my lifetime already. You can Google the number of companies they have bought.

Amazon did something similar but for different reasons. The reason they got so big wasn’t the amazing technology it was because bezos had a lot of connections that got him a lot of capital and he used that Capital to buy up any potential competitors.

Unless and until we stop mergers and acquisitions and start breaking up these monopolies prices are going to keep going up and up and up and up. Just like they did when the robber barons were in charge.

We all got told this in 7th grade. I don’t know why we all forgot it. Or why we prioritize various bits of nonsense like trans girls in sports over antitrust law enforcement.

How is all this stuff not ALREADY illegal?

By SteWhite • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

The amount of anti-competitive tactics being used by the big techs firms is ridiculous - and I thought it was illegal already but the relevant authorities were just really, really slow to take action.

Example - if you are on Windows, open Microsoft Edge and type “google chrome download” into the address/search bar.

Is the top match the page to download Chrome? Technically yes. Right under a huge “Promoted by Microsoft” section which says:

“All you need is right here
Microsoft Edge runs on the same technology as Chrome, with the added trust of Microsoft.”

Then a nice big prominent blue button saying “Get started” which, if clicked, takes you to a page all about how fantastic Edge is.

Can you even imagine a more blatant anti-competitive tactic? I find if absolutely incredible that big tech firms get away with this kind of crap.

Why Apple Temporarily Blocked Popular Vibe Coding Apps

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from the tech-news blog Neowin:
Apple appears to have temporarily prevented apps, including Replit and Vibecode, from pushing new updates. Apple seems bothered by how apps like Replit present vibe-coded apps in a web view within the original app. This process virtually allows the app to become something else. And the new app isn’t distributed via the App Store, but it still runs on the user’s device… [S]uch apps would also bypass the App Store Review process that ensures that apps are safe to use and meet Apple’s design and performance standards…

According to the publication (via MacRumors), Apple was close to approving pending updates for such apps if they changed how they work. For instance, Replit would get the green light if its developers configure the app to open vibe-coded apps in an external browser rather than the in-app web view.

Vibecode is also close to being approved if it removes features, such as the ability to develop apps specifically for the App Store.

Evolve or die

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 3 Thread
Should simply generating your own apps become cheap and effective it is going to break the entire central app store model. I don’t know if this will happen or not, but if these people believe their own AI hype they are right to be afraid.

Yep, Replit suggested this

By Robert Goatse • Score: 3 Thread
I was vibe coding a legit game that I want to put on the App/Play stores. Replit actually recommended to use web view to circumvent the developer yearly cost and user’s can still play my game. I may go the App store route just to learn the process, so we’ll see if I can get through the walled garden.

William Shatner Celebrates 95th Birthday, Smokes Cigar, Revisits ‘Rocket Man’ and Tests X Money

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It was 60 years ago when William Shatner — born in 1931 — portrayed Captain Kirk in the TV series Star Trek. Shatner turns 95 today — and celebrated by posting a picture of himself smoking a cigar.

“At 95, I’m still smokin’!” Shatner joked, adding that in life he’d learned two things. “Never waste a good cigar. Never trust anyone who says you should ‘act your age.’"

For more celebrations, Paramount’s free/ad-supported streaming platform Pluto TV announced a “Trek TV takeover birthday celebration” that will run through April 3rd, according to TrekMovie.com, with marathon of Star Trek movies and TV shows — and even that time he was roasted on Comedy Central. (“Freeâ½ My favorite price!” Shatner quipped on X.com.)

Shatner still remains a popular celebrity, even travelling to space five years ago on a Blue Origin flight past the Kármán line. Since then he’s led a cruise to Antarctica — and even performed an alternate take of Captain Kirk’s final scene on the Jimmy Fallon show.

And this week Shatner (along with hundreds of thousands attendees) appeared at Orlando’s MegaCon — and shared stories about his life with Orlando Weekly:
Shatner: Last month, I was on board a cruise ship, and they said the only thing I had to do over the next three days, “before we let you go home,” is sing “Rocket Man.” So I thought, “I’m not going to sing ‘Rocket Man’ the same way that what’s-his-name did. … So, I looked at the song very carefully to see if I could find what actors call a throughline. What is the character singing? What is he singing about? And so I look through all of these weird lyrics, and all of a sudden, the word sticks out to me: “alone.” So I say to the band members, “OK, let’s make this song about being alone in space.” And I work on it with the band and the musicians, and again on a Saturday night, I perform the number, and 4,000 people stand up and applaud “Rocket Man.” And they won’t let me off the stage, again and again. Four times, I get a standing ovation, wild.

And that’s the progression for me, of science fiction for me, as exemplified by this song. The song went from superficial to something of depth and meaning… It touched people enough for them to stand up and applaud, and I realized that is the story of science fiction… Science fiction with all its great technology has evolved into great storytelling that reaches people in a manner that is very difficult for other types of drama to do.
Shatner answered questions from Slashdot readers in 2002 (“My life is my statement…”) and again in 2011. (“I used to try to assemble computers way back when and they came out looking like a skateboard…”)

And judging by his X.com posts, Shatner is now involved in early testing of the site’s upcoming digital payment system X Money.

Most of the ST cast hates him

By wgoodman • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The first time I met him was at Dykstra’s house for a scavenger hunt picture. I was pretending to play the cello in a pretend wedding that had to be officiated by a ship’s captain. He was very curt to everyone, but we got a great picture out of it.

Re:How come he outlived Chuck Norris?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Chuck Norris didn’t kill himself. He just got tired of defeating everyone on earth, transcended life, and decided to go try and punch God.

A happy birthday

By Teun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I wish William a happy birthday and good health.

Re: How come he outlived Chuck Norris?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Well, perhaps the GP was just returning the favor for Trump baselessly blaming Rob Reiner’s death on his political affiliations.

Re: How come he outlived Chuck Norris?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Funny Thread

It wasn’t an argument, it was merely speculation.

For arguments you want room 12A, next door.

A CNN Producer Explores the ‘Magic AI’ Workout Mirror

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
CNN looks at “the Magic AI fitness mirror,” a new product “watching you, and giving you feedback automatically,” while sometimes playing footage of a recorded personal trainer.

Long-time Slashdot reader destinyland describes CNN’s video report:
CNN says the device “tracks form, counts reps, and corrects technique in real-time — and it doesn’t go easy on you.” (Although the company’s CEO/cofounder, Varun Bhanot, says “we’re not trying to completely replace personal trainers. What we are providing is a more accessible alternative.”)

CNN call the company “more a computer-vision firm than a fitness company, building the tech for this mirror from the ground up.” CEO Bhanot tells CNN he’d hired a personal trainer in his 20s to get fit, but “Going through that journey, I realized how old-fashioned personal training was. Dumbbells were still dumb. There was no data or augmentation for the whole process!”

“The AI fitness and wellness market is already huge — and it’s growing,” CNN adds. “In 2025 the global market was worth $11 billion, according to [market research firm] Insightace Analytic. By 2035, this market is expected to reach just shy of $58 billion. And Magic AI is far from alone. Form, Total, Speediance, and Echelon, to name a few, are all brands vying for a slice of this market.
Even the most purely physical of activities — exercising your body — now gets “enhanced” with AI accessories…

more /. shilling

By dfghjk • Score: 3 Thread

‘Bhanot tells CNN he’d hired a personal trainer in his 20s to get fit, but “Going through that journey, I realized how old-fashioned personal training was. Dumbbells were still dumb. There was no data or augmentation for the whole process!”'

What a moron. Yet his product is being shilled here.

In the dirt maggot!

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Make R. Lee Ermey the Marine Corps drill instructor avatar that lives within this thing. “You are a disgusting fat body Pyle!” I was amazed at how, in just three months, I went from an average fairly lazy teenager to a physically fit motivated beast during Marine Corps boot camp. As a bonus add “incentives” to do better like letting the mirror shock you when you are not sweating enough to reach your true potential or locking your AI cloud connected Samsung fridge’s door when it deems you are too disgusting and fat. When the avatar notices you have gotten in your car and heading to a fast food joint it shuts down your AI cloud connected car. “Not on my watch maggot!” :) AI and the cloud are your friends.

AI is an exciting new tech

By MpVpRb • Score: 3 Thread

…with lots of potential good uses
Unfortunately hucksters, marketoids, salesweasels, trendmongers and other assorted slimeballs will try to ride the AI wave to riches by slapping bad AI onto every imaginable consumer product with easily predictable results