Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Nvidia Expects To Sell ‘At Least’ $1 Trillion In AI Chips By 2028
  2. Are Split Spacebars the Next Big Gaming Keyboard Trend?
  3. US SEC Preparing To Scrap Quarterly Reporting Requirement
  4. Asteroid Ryugu Has All of the Main Ingredients For Life
  5. Bills Would Ban Liability Lawsuits For Climate Change
  6. Hydropower Line From Quebec Could Power a Million NYC Homes
  7. New ‘Vibe Coded’ AI Translation Tool Splits the Video Game Preservation Community
  8. ‘Pokemon Go’ Players Unknowingly Trained Delivery Robots With 30 Billion Images
  9. Nvidia Bets On OpenClaw, But Adds a Security Layer Via NemoClaw
  10. Polymarket Gamblers Threaten To Kill Journalist Over Iran Missile Story
  11. Encyclopedia Britannica Sues OpenAI For Copyright, Trademark Infringement
  12. Apple Launches AirPods Max 2 With Better ANC, Live Translation
  13. Meta Signs $27 Billion AI Infrastructure Deal With Nebius
  14. Data Centers Overtake Offices In US Construction-Spending Shift
  15. Court Rules TCL’s ‘QLED’ TVs Aren’t Truly QLED

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Nvidia Expects To Sell ‘At Least’ $1 Trillion In AI Chips By 2028

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang threw out a lot of numbers — mostly of the technical variety — during his keynote Monday to kick off the company’s annual GTC Conference in San Jose, California. But there was one financial figure that investors surely took notice of: his projection that there will be $1 trillion worth of orders for Nvidia’s Blackwell and Vera Rubin chips, a monetary reflection of a booming AI business.

About an hour into his keynote, Huang noted that last year Nvidia saw about $500 billion in demand for its Blackwell and upcoming Rubin chips through 2026. “Now, I don’t know if you guys feel the same way, but $500 billion is an enormous amount of revenue,” he said. “Well, I’m here to tell you that right now where I stand — a few short months after GTC DC, one year after last GTC — right here where I stand, I see through 2027, at least $1 trillion.”

Are Split Spacebars the Next Big Gaming Keyboard Trend?

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
“There are countless upgrades you could make to your gaming setup,” writes PC Gamer’s Jacob Ridley. “A wireless this, a bigger that, a faster thing. But how do you know what’s going to be a genuine upgrade worth investing in? Personally, I think it might be split spacebars.” His argument centers on the fact that spacebars take up a “greedy” amount of keyboard space — space that could instead be divided into multiple keys for different actions, such as voice chat or melee attacks. From the report:
While it’s often very easy to reprogram your spacebar to do a different action via your keyboard’s software, it’s a lot harder to reprogram your brain to hit any other key when you try to jump in game. Spacebar makes you jump. Everyone knows that; it’s practically etched onto your brain if you’re a long-time mouse and keyboard player. So, why does a split spacebar help with that? It comes down to this: once you know which side of a spacebar you tend to thwack with your thumb, you can program the other side to do whatever you want. I hit the right-side of my spacebar every time when I’m typing. Therefore, when I started using a Wooting 60HE v2 with a split spacebar, I set the left-side to be the delete key; the keyboard lacking a dedicated delete key for its 60% size.

Though for gaming, the split spacebar offers much more varied purpose. People do strange things with the WASD keys that I won’t litigate here, but I’m pretty sure most gamers use their left thumb to strike the spacebar for gaming. Right? Right. If you fall into this category, you have the option of using the right-side spacebar for things like a chunky melee key, or, my personal favorite, an in-game voice chat key.

wot

By ZERO1ZERO • Score: 3 Thread
if i’ve my left hand on wasd, thumb on the left of space, and my right hand is on my mouse. How on earth do i hit the right side of my space bar without you know, moving either hand. , In which case i have about 90 other keys I could use instead. What’s that you say ? oh right yeah , ..unzips…

Gamepad

By Himmy32 • Score: 3 Thread
At that point, why not use something purposefully designed like a gamepad. Maybe if this trend continues, Logitech will bring back the G13

US SEC Preparing To Scrap Quarterly Reporting Requirement

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The U.S. SEC is reportedly preparing a proposal to make quarterly earnings reports optional, potentially allowing companies to report results just twice a year. “The proposal could be published as soon as next month,” reports Reuters, citing a paywalled report from the Wall Street Journal, adding that “regulators are in talks with major exchanges to discuss how their rules may need to be adjusted.” Reuters reports:
The SEC will vote on the proposal once it is published, after a public comment period which typically lasts at least 30 days, the report said. The WSJ report added that the rule is expected to make quarterly reporting optional and not eliminate it altogether. The proposed change in the reporting standard would allow listed companies to publish results every six months instead of the current mandate to report figures every 90 days.

Trump, who first floated the idea in his first term as president, has argued the change in requirements would discourage shortsightedness from public companies while cutting costs. Skeptics, however, caution delaying disclosures could reduce transparency and heighten market volatility.

Why not yearly?

By alvinrod • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Why not just switch to yearly reporting? Companies can still report more often, but if it allows companies to hire managers that aren’t constantly chasing quarterly results at the expense of long term prospects, it’s better for everyone other than investors that like to profit off of valuation swings from quarterly earnings reports. Those people aren’t creating anything of real value anyway so why should I care if they have to find something more useful to do?

Information Hiding

By Luthair • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Corporations are already engaged in pretty heavy information hiding that really limits the ability of investors to evaluate businesses. For example one would think that the number of iphones sold would be pretty important to know.

Mixed feelings..

By Local ID10T • Score: 3 Thread

I have mixed feelings on this.

On the one hand, reducing modern businesses chasing short-term results over longer term goals is a good thing.

On the other hand, reporting less often to share holders feels like "Trust me, bro."

Overall, I think that for most businesses, detailed annual reporting is the sweet spot. It gives enough time to actually accomplish something -or at least make meaningful progress. It is not so long that we (as investors) forget what they promised in the previous report.

It’s All Bullshit Anyway

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

It’s all bullshit anyway.

I find the quarterly reporting to be too fast of a cadence. It introduces a lot of market volatility. So, shifting to biannually seems like a good idea.

But, the reality is that it probably won’t matter much. Just as we have now, the important information always gets leaked to insider “analysts” and the trading takes place before the earnings announcement. So, I’m not sure how much volatility will actually be reduced since companies will probably leak more frequently than biannually.

Re:Why not yearly?

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Publicly traded companies constitute less than 1 percent of all U.S. firms and about one-third of U.S. employment in the non-farm business sector.

The only thing that can reliably create higher wages is competition.

This is true but also if we are going to use market principles here we have to accept that there is a form of market failure in labor that has to be accounted for in that people have to work.

Unless you qualify for disability or SS you need a job to survive or its out on the street. A key aspect of a competitive market is the ability for the buyer to walk away from a purchase, not simply to have an alternative. With labor very few people have the option to not work so the power balance is in favor of employers. Two sellers competing for a buyer who is forced to buy from one of them is ripe for perverse incentives and collusion.

Alternatively they can leave and form their own company and as an owner be the one to keep all of that profit for themselves.

This is not realistic for a number of reasons. Those companies will need workers also.

Asteroid Ryugu Has All of the Main Ingredients For Life

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Samples from the asteroid Ryugu contain all five nucleobases — the key building blocks of DNA and RNA. “This strengthens the idea that asteroids may have brought the ingredients for the first living organisms to Earth long ago,” reports New Scientist. From the report:
Japan’s Hayabusa 2 spacecraft visited Ryugu in 2018, where it shot two projectiles — one small and one large — into the surface of the asteroid and collected the resulting debris. It arrived back at Earth with the samples in 2020 and researchers have been analyzing these in detail ever since. Yasuhiro Oba at Hokkaido University in Japan and his colleagues examined two samples, one from the asteroid’s surface and one comprised of subsurface materials excavated by the projectiles. In both, the team found all five primary nucleobases, which are the compounds that make up the nucleic acids DNA and RNA when combined with sugars and phosphoric acid.

This isn’t the first time that nucleobases have been found in asteroid samples: they have been seen in meteorites, too, and in samples from the asteroid Bennu. The researchers did find different abundances of the various nucleobases among the various samples, though, which hints that these compounds might be useful for tracing asteroids and meteorites back to the parent bodies that they broke off from in the distant past, as well as understanding the evolution of those parent bodies over time.
The findings have been published in the journal Nature Astronomy.

Re:Interesting, but

By dfghjk • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

You seem not to understand how science works. There can be multiple theories worth considering.

“Is there any reason to suppose they weren’t formed here, by the same or similar processes by which they ended up on the asteroids?”

To suppose? What do you mean by suppose? Assume? Yes there is a reason not to assume. Theorize? No, there is no reason not to theorize, so how do you test that theory?

Do you oppose scientists trying to advance knowledge?

Re:Interesting, but

By DamnOregonian • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

and being abundant everywhere it is not too hot for them to be destroyed.

Like the gravitationally heated (see: melted) ball of rock and iron that became the Earth?

Re:Interesting, but

By DamnOregonian • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
1) No, things like asteroids do not undergo gravitational heating to the point of melting into a ball of lava. They lack the mass.
2) It’s not saying life came from space. What we call life almost certainly originated here. The building blocks of it likely came from space.
3) I’d argue an attempt at trying to pinpoint the origin of life, given the breadth of knowledge we currently have, is unscientific.

Any planet of sufficient mass would be totally sterilized in its formation. Space rocks wouldn’t be. If the building blocks of life are prevalent on the space rocks of the solar system, Earth was almost certainly (at least partially, or mostly) re-seeded after its formation.
I don’t really see how this makes any difference to anything, but it does help bolster the idea that life is probably quite prevalent anywhere those building blocks can be put to use to its end.

Bills Would Ban Liability Lawsuits For Climate Change

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Inside Climate News:
Republican lawmakers in multiple states and Congress are advancing proposals to shield polluters from climate accountability and prevent any type of liability for climate change harms — even as these harms and their associated costs continue to mount. It’s the latest in a counter-offensive that has unfolded on multiple fronts, from the halls of Congress and the White House to courts and state attorneys general offices across the country.

Dozens of local communities, states and individuals are suing major oil and gas companies and their trade associations over rising climate costs and for allegedly lying to consumers about climate change risks and solutions. At the same time, some states are enacting or considering laws modeled after the federal Superfund program that would impose retroactive liability on large fossil fuel producers and levy a one-time charge on them to help fund climate adaptation and resiliency measures. But many of these cases and climate superfund laws could be stopped in their tracks, either by the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court or by the Republican-controlled Congress.

Last month the court decided to take up a petition lodged by oil companies Suncor and ExxonMobil in a climate-damages case brought against the companies by Boulder, Colorado. The petition argues that Boulder’s claims are barred by federal law, and if the justices agree, it could knock out not only Boulder’s lawsuit but also many others like it. The court is expected to hear the case during its upcoming term that starts in October. There is also a possibility that Republicans in Congress will take action before then to gift the fossil fuel industry legal immunity, similar to that granted to gun manufacturers with the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Sixteen Republican attorneys general wrote (PDF) to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi in June suggesting that the Department of Justice could recommend legislation creating precisely this type of liability shield. And last month, one Republican congresswoman announced that such legislation is indeed in the works.
“The ultimate democratic institution in America is the jury,” said former Washington Gov. Jay Inslee. Enacting policies that prevent or block climate-related lawsuits against polluters, he said, would effectively shutter “the doors of the courthouse to Americans that have been injured by oil and gas company pollution and by their lies and deceit about that pollution.”
“I really think it’s an un-American effort to deny Americans the traditional right of access to a jury,” Inslee said. Oil and gas executives are “terrified” by the prospect of having to stand before a jury and face evidence of their climate-change lies and deception, he added. “You’ll see the steam coming out of the jury’s ears when they hear about how they’ve been lied to for decades. [Oil companies] understand why juries will be outraged by it, and they are shaking in their boots. The day of reckoning is coming, and that’s why they’re afraid.”

Pointless law

By FictionPimp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There is no man made climate change, so why do we need laws like this? Instead pass a loser pays legal system. Then when these companies prove there is no man made climate change they can get their money back.

It’s easy.

Re: People are confused because judges lie

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Good grief that is warped in terms of your view of civic duty. Nobody can enjoy even really basic rights like a fair trial without jurors. Therefore everyone must have a duty to serve. Sure we could pay them more but with what? oh right more taxes also effectively bills of attainder where the government takes your property (money usually) without having convicted you of a crime.

Really fairness would mean one of two things, either we

A) don’t pay jurors at all. Service is simply viewed as the price tag for living in a free society.

That has problems because it means those living hand to mouth could find jury duty ruinous, which strikes me as a bad policy.

B) pay people whatever income they can reasonably demonstrate they are forging while serving. The current system is if anything excessively progressive in that someone making minimum wage at their day job is losing a whole lot less income than someone who might perhaps make three times that. It is really unfair.

Look in the mirror

By WaffleMonster • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I would support such a bill that narrowly focused on irreducible GHG emissions. I do not in any way support deflections of responsibility away from individual consumers who persist in knowingly buying hydrocarbons directly as well as products requiring hydrocarbon inputs knowing full well the pollution they are causing. If it is germane to sue the Exxon’s of the world for their contribution to climate change it should be equally germane to sue anyone and everyone for theirs.

Also it is common knowledge ex post facto laws are explicitly unconstitutional. That anyone would even attempt to impose “retroactive liability” is an abuse of the system not far removed from DoJ’s inept campaigns of retribution against Donald’s political enemies.

I generally oppose all climate change related taxation where 100% of the proceeds are not spent on preventing climate change. These schemes are regressive and most allow proceeds to be placed into the general fund which clearly demonstrates unserious intent.

Re:This is what evil looks like - OH PLEASE

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Even if all of that were true, oil companies are still not solely to blame for it all. And what would be the point in suing them?

Same as the tobacco companies.

Also, there’s no justice in it.

Good thing the corporations that totally knew what they were doing have you to stick up for them. Everyone needs a nice throat job once in a while.

Re:This is what evil looks like - OH PLEASE

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

While that may be true it also enriched us, improved the quality of our lives, and all the while many of the downsides were brought about not by those companies, but rather the end user’s hunger for the product. Even now we know the incredible dangers and yet people will happily pour oil into their cars, drive excessively instead of walking, buying isolated homes in the suburbs, and we’re still flattening cities to make space for parking.

At some point we need to stop pointing at others and except some personal fucking responsibility.

Also sidenote: Many of the problems you list are some how uniquely American despite the group you are criticising being multinational companies that operated literally in every civilized (and several uncivilised) corners of the world. How do you rationalise that?

Hydropower Line From Quebec Could Power a Million NYC Homes

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Champlain Hudson Power Express, a $6 billion, 339-mile buried transmission line, will soon deliver Canadian hydropower from Hydro-Quebec to New York City. The project could supply up to 20% of the city’s electricity and power roughly one million homes throughout the year. “This is far and away the largest project I have ever worked on,” said Bob Harrison, who has worked in infrastructure for 40 years and is the head of engineering for the Champlain Hudson Power Express. “We like to say it’s the largest project you’ll never see.” The New York Times reports:
The massive power project, expected to provide energy to a million New York City customers a year, travels underground and underwater, from the northern plains at the Canadian border to the filled-in marshlands of coastal Queens, much of it loosely following the Hudson River. Its construction included the underwater installation of more than two million feet of cable imported from Sweden. It also required special boats, loaded with equipment that could shoot water jets deep into the sediment, to create trenches for the cable. Then, when it came to placing cable beneath the landscape, more than 700 land-use easements were needed, plus an additional 1.55 million feet of cable.

The Champlain Hudson Power Express has found a way to plug into the city, but it wasn’t easy. The work included 10 new manholes and more than three miles of new underground circuitry, according to Con Edison, the city’s primary electricity provider. “It was literally a hand weave under the streets of Queens,” said Jennifer Laird-White, the head of external affairs for Transmission Developers. The hydropower travels from Canada via two buried cables that are as round as cantaloupes. Those lines snake for hundreds of miles under a lake, several rivers (including the Hudson for about 90 miles) and through buried trenches alongside train tracks and roads. The cables resurface in Astoria, Queens, where a converter station shapes, filters and refines the raw power into a product that New Yorkers can consume.

In two cavernous rooms that could be mistaken for “Star Wars” sets, the electricity flows through 30 hanging structures encased in what look like metallic, dinosaurlike exoskeletons. Each one weighs about as much as a small humpback whale and contains microprocessors, thousands of valves and fiber wires. “I am still wowed when I walk into that facility,” said Mr. Harrison, the engineer. “I mean, it is just mind-boggling.”

Quebec use 99% hydro & from renewable electric

By ls671 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Just in case some don’t know, Quebec use 99% hydro and from renewable electricity and still has quite a bit leftover to export:
https://www.hydroquebec.com/ab…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Re:Hey Canada, here’s a hint

By ls671 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

As I posted above, Quebec uses 99% hydro and renewable and still has plenty to export. They sell some to Ontario and the maritime provinces but it’s more a matter of transmission lines. Selling it to British Columbia or Alberta would be harder at the moment due to the lack of transmission lines as well as transmission losses if there were any. So, there is still some available to sell to the near states in United States at market price there or a bit lower.

By the way, Hydro-Quebec is owned by the government and all the profits go to the government and helps paying the cost of running the government like education, roads and social programs etc. Citizens in Quebec pay around 7 cents a KWh at that’s Canadian money where 1 $CAN == 0.70 $US

The NY Times ain’t what it used to be

By bradley13 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Bizarre journalism. The NY Times really isn’t what it used to be. Cables as “round as cantaloupes”? We assume they meant to describe the thickness. A structure as heavy as a “small humpback whale”? I have no idea how big (or small) that might be. Some actual, useful facts would be nice. Voltage? Watts? It’s probably a fascinating engineering project, but someone needs to go back to journalism school.

For anyone curious, the CHPE site (the first link) does have some better info: 1250MW, 339 miles of cable.

Re:The NY Times ain’t what it used to be

By FictionPimp • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You are not wrong. I asked Claude:

The average American adult reads at roughly a 7th to 8th grade level, so that’s the target for accessible news writing.
Most major news organizations aim for 6th to 8th grade. The Associated Press and USA Today tend to land around 6th to 7th grade. The New York Times sits a bit higher, closer to 8th to 9th grade, which reflects a somewhat more educated readership.
The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula is the standard tool for measuring this. Short sentences, common words, and one idea per paragraph drive the score down, which is what you want for broad accessibility.
So if you asked me to write a news story for the average American adult, I’d target 7th grade as the sweet spot.

Re:Hey Canada, here’s a hint

By Fross • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Choosing it to sell to someone whose administration is actively trying to undermine you, would be self-defeating.

This isn’t about business. The US is burning its bridges, well, let’s burn this one too. Trade is for people you can trust and rely on.

New ‘Vibe Coded’ AI Translation Tool Splits the Video Game Preservation Community

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Since Andrej Karpathy coined the term “vibe coding” just over a year ago, we’ve seen a rapid increase in both the capabilities and popularity of using AI models to throw together quick programming projects with less human time and effort than ever before. One such vibe-coded project, Gaming Alexandria Researcher, launched over the weekend as what coder Dustin Hubbard called an effort to help organize the hundreds of scanned Japanese gaming magazines he’s helped maintain at clearinghouse Gaming Alexandria over the years, alongside machine translations of their OCR text.

A day after that project went public, though, Hubbard was issuing an apology to many members of the Gaming Alexandria community who loudly objected to the use of Patreon funds for an error-prone AI-powered translation effort. The hubbub highlights just how controversial AI tools remain for many online communities, even as many see them as ways to maximize limited funds and man-hours. “I sincerely apologize,” Hubbard wrote in his apology post. “My entire preservation philosophy has been to get people access to things we’ve never had access to before. I felt this project was a good step towards that, but I should have taken more into consideration the issues with AI.”
“I’m very, very disappointed to see [Gaming Alexandria], one of the foremost organizations for preserving game history, promoting the use of AI translation and using Patreon funds to pay for AI licenses,” game designer and Legend of Zelda historian Max Nichols wrote in a post on Bluesky over the weekend. “I have cancelled my Patreon membership and will no longer promote the organization.”

Nichols later deleted his original message (archived here), saying he was “uncomfortable with the scale of reposts and anger” it had generated in the community. However, he maintained his core criticism: that Gemini-generated translations inevitably introduce inaccuracies that make them unreliable for scholarly use.

In a follow-up, he also objected to Patreon funds being used to pay for AI tools that produce what he called “untrustworthy” translations, arguing they distort history and are not valid sources for research. "… It’s worthless and destructive: these translations are like looking at history through a clownhouse mirror,” he added.

It’s the worst it’ll be

By cliffjumper222 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Geez, what a silly over reaction. AI translation is freaking amazing, and today is the worst it will be. Just put a disclaimer that the translation is the best available at this time and will be improved over time. The “I’ve canceled my subscription ire” is ai-phobia.
Oh là là, quelle réaction excessive et idiote. La traduction par IA est carrément incroyable, et aujourd’hui est le pire niveau qu’elle atteindra. Il suffit de mettre un avertissement disant que la traduction est la meilleure disponible actuellement et qu’elle s’améliorera avec le temps. Cette colère du style “j’ai annulé mon abonnement”, c’est de l’IA-phobie.
Vaya, qué reacción exagerada tan tonta. La traducción por IA es malditamente increíble, y hoy es lo peor que va a estar. Solo pon un aviso de que la traducción es la mejor disponible en este momento y que mejorará con el tiempo. Esa ira de “he cancelado mi suscripción” es simple IA-fobia.
Meine Güte, was für eine alberne Überreaktion. KI-Übersetzung ist wahnsinnig toll, und heute ist sie so schlecht, wie sie nie wieder sein wird. Setz einfach einen Disclaimer drunter, dass dies die aktuell beste verfügbare Übersetzung ist und sie mit der Zeit verbessert wird. Dieser Zorn à la Ich habe mein Abo gekündigt‘ ist reine KI-Phobie.
(No Patreon Funds Were Spent Obtaining These Translations)

Re:It’s the worst it’ll be

By DamnOregonian • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The accuracy part is a red herring.
They couldn’t give a fuck about the accuracy.

If you post anything using AI in any kind of open forum, a very vocal minority is going to accuse you of destroying the environment and the economies of the world.
The unemployed have opinions.

I am unkomfortable with

By thegarbz • Score: 3 Thread

People using software with built in spell chequers to write. I hereby will not be supporting anyone who posts anything using any fancy digital tool to right.
How dare people use tools to do work.

How dare they use funds as they see fit to achieve exactly what I paid for. It’s unacceptable! I demand that they do their job the way I expect them too. Next time I sea any of this spell chequed bullshit I will be taking my $10 contribution elsewhere.

Regards
Karen.

Stop being stubborn

By allo • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

Did you have a look at the “boycott projects that use AI” software? It is growing and growing. Because coders know how to use efficient tools. If you want to refuse anything that touches AI, you need to become a hermit. You’re fighting a losing fight instead of embracing what great tools you get for free. You don’t need to use them, but at least do not stand in the way of others.

What did we learn.. nothing

By mattr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I have worked with game designers, have been a translator, and am a developer. I have been a professional translator and had a friend who only did game translation. Yes I know designers hate AI and I understand it. I translated patents, corporate docs, scientific papers, manga, etc. Translation business has probably gone poof by now due to AI. But.. manga translation is actually really hard. Not only did the margins shrink to impossible due to lack of interest / budget for quality, it is also like translating film subtitles and sometimes even required historical research.

These days, I use Claude to check my Japanese before sending and sometimes to figure out obtuse emails sometimes. My written Japanese has improved. Claude is really good but I wouldn’t use it for a final production film subtitle, game, or manga. For this purpose though, it would be amazingly fantastic as the sheer volume and the purpose of research means nobody overseas would be able to ever grasp a fraction of it or translate it all manually. As noted in the Ars Technica article: “Famitsu alone is over 1,900 issues, each with [a hundred-plus] pages,” journalist and author Felipe Pepe noted. “That’s one magazine from one country. [Human translation] would be ideal, but it’s impossible.”

I skimmed the GPL’d code, after 1500 lines got tired and got Claude to quickly scan it. It sounds like a really cool scanned document viewer with side translation viewer, but is not a translator at all. The guy in TFA apparently used some of the project’s funds for translation of the scanned magazines which he mentioned were like $1 per issue which honestly, it is like 1000x cheaper than a human. No human could ever do it unless it was their lifelong hobby maybe. But, there must have been a lot of issues so I guess he racked up some charges and AI haters gunned him down, apparently.

If you really were learning Japanese (like I did long ago) you might try all kinds of scanning, OCR, online and offline dictionaries, and still not understand everything due to made-up fantasy words. You might have to corral some Japanese gamers to answer questions you cannot figure out. So this is not as good as having a Japanese otaku next to you but still pretty great and you could improve the translations too, couldn’t you?

It looks like Nichols who hates anything AI deleted his post, and the person who spent tokens to translate is paying back to the project with his own money. And he made a GPL’d viewer which sounds nice. So it sounds like in the end, we have butt-hurt and afraid people, one honestly kind-hearted guy, some new OSS software, a free archive at archive.org, and a lot of translations this guy paid for. Hopefully other people might contribute translations either automated or not, so that people do not *at home* each pay for tokens to just translate their own copies of magazines that could have been just translated once and posted on the archive. I have no idea about copyright though I think one was from 1992. Nobody mentioned anything about that and if it is for historical research it sounds like fair use..

‘Pokemon Go’ Players Unknowingly Trained Delivery Robots With 30 Billion Images

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
More than 30 billion images captured by Pokemon Go players have helped train a visual mapping system developed by Niantic. The technology is now being used to guide delivery robots from Coco Robotics through city streets where GPS often struggles. Popular Science reports:
This week, Niantic Spatial, part of the team behind Pokemon Go, announced a partnership with Coco Robotics, a company that makes short-distance delivery robots for food and groceries. Soon, those robot couriers will scoot around sidewalks using Niantic’s Visual Positioning System (VPS)— a navigation tool that can reportedly pinpoint location down to a few centimeters just by looking at nearby buildings and landmarks. Niantic trained that VPS model on more than 30 billion images captured by Pokemon Go users, and claims it will help robots operate in areas where GPS falls short. […]

Instead of helping users navigate the way that GPS does, VPS determines where someone is based on their surroundings. That makes Pokemon Go particularly useful as a data source, because players had to physically travel to specific locations and point their phones at various angles. That mapping effort got a significant boost in 2020, when the app added what it called "Field Research,” a feature prompting players to scan real-world statues and landmarks with their cameras in exchange for in-game rewards. A portion of the data also reportedly came from areas known as “Pokemon battle arenas.” Whether players knew it or not, those scans were creating 3D models of the real world that would eventually power the Niantic model. More data means better accuracy, and because Niantic was collecting images of the same locations from many different users, it could capture the same spots across varying weather conditions, lighting, angles, and heights. […]

The idea is that Coco’s robots can use VPS and four cameras mounted around the machine to get a far more precise read on their surroundings. In turn, the well-equipped robot will deliver food on time. On a broader level, Niantic says its partnership with Coco Robotics is part of a longer-term effort to build a "living map" of the world that updates as new data becomes available. Once VPS-equipped delivery robots hit the streets, they will collect even more info that can be fed back into the model to bolster its accuracy further. This kind of continuous, real-world data collection is already central to how self-driving vehicle companies like Waymo and Tesla operate, and is a large part of why that technology has improved so significantly in recent years.

Should we be outraged?

By Tony Isaac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Lots of people played a free game that required them to take lots of pictures. Did the players ever think the photos would be theirs to keep? If so, what made them think that?

The use of these photos also seems pretty benign and useful.

I’m having trouble having a problem with this.

Re:If it’s free…

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Honestly, this is just about the best plan for getting deep involvement in crowdsourced training data I can think of. It’s fucking brilliant.

You come up with a mobile video game where the whole premise is to go around taking pictures of stuff. You co-brand it with a ridiculously popular video game and collectible trading card IP. You back up an armored truck to shovel all the money into.

And then you use that constant firehose of images coming in of urban areas across the globe to train your AI navigation system. Nobody’s personal data is exposed or sold any more than what Google Streetmaps shows.

This doesn’t seem evil to me at all. It seems like a really fucking good business strategy to turn the most expensive part of your business plan into a revenue center.

Re:Should we be outraged?

By CrankyFool • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I’m a Pokemon Go player; been playing it pretty intensely for the last 16 months or so, level 74 (of a max of 80).

Firstly, this is not in any way surprising or upsetting. Niantic’s been pretty clear for a long time now that they were making location-based games for the purpose of training systems.

Secondly, I should note that POGO does not actually require you to take pictures of anything. It’s an option, one way to do what Pokemon Go calls “Field Research Tasks” (FRTs), but “take a scan of that place” FRTs are a small subset of the FRTs you might choose to do (and when I was attempting to get as many as possible on my way to level 74 I ignored all the scanning ones).

Re:Should we be outraged?

By MachineShedFred • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m right there with you. This seems to me to be a quite brilliant way to make the most expensive part of your business strategy (obtaining billions of photos of cities across the globe, being targeted in real time to get you the image coverage you need) into a wildly successful revenue generator. They figured out the problem, and then came up with a creative solution to it, and then backed up the armored truck to shovel money into.

It’s not like they’re privacy raping you for money like Google / Meta / X / etc. This is basically a smarter Google StreetView, without the car.

Re:If it’s free…

By Simon Garlick • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Niantic started life as an internal team at Google working on monetising location data. Being a revenue centre was the whole point from day one.

Only the “delivery robots” bit of this is actually news. Niantic being a datamining operation that tricked its users into scanning the real world for it is not. Hell Zuboff devoted a chunk of “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism” to it and that book came out in 2019.

Nvidia Bets On OpenClaw, But Adds a Security Layer Via NemoClaw

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
During today’s Nvidia GTC keynote, the company introduced NemoClaw, a security-focused stack designed to make the autonomous AI agent platform OpenClaw safer. ZDNet explains how it works:
NemoClaw installs Nvidia’s OpenShell, a new open-source runtime that keeps agents safer to use by enforcing an organization’s policy-based guardrails. OpenShell keeps models sandboxed, adds data privacy protections and additional security for agents, and makes them more scalable. “This provides the missing infrastructure layer beneath claws to give them the access they need to be productive, while enforcing policy-based security, network, and privacy guardrails,” Nvidia said in the announcement. The company built OpenShell with security companies like CrowdStrike, Cisco, and Microsoft Security to ensure it is compatible with other cybersecurity tools.

Nvidia said NemoClaw can be installed in a single command, runs on any platform, and can use any coding agent, including Nvidia’s own Nemotron open model family, on a local system. Through a privacy router, it allows agents to access frontier models in the cloud, which unites local and cloud models to help teach agents how to complete tasks within privacy guardrails, Nvidia explained. Nvidia seems to be hoping that the additional security can make OpenClaw agents more popular and accessible, with less risk than they currently carry. The bigger picture here is how NemoClaw could give companies the added peace of mind to let AI agents complete actions for their employees, where they wouldn’t have previously.
Nvidia did not specify when NemoClaw would be available.

JFC I’m So Confused

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

So we’ve got Docker containers housing sandboxes, that run javascript code that does API calls to web based LLMs(nobody is running local cause you can’t buy the fucking hardware cuz AI). It’s just an incomprehensible madhouse of spaghetti at this point.

NVIDIA makes no real explanation of how this increases security or how to do the “guardrails”. As if the existing MESS of endless layers of .md and .yaml file declarations aren’t convoluted enough.

And NVIDIA want to bring this to the masses? I thought I was pretty techno-savvy. But, this shit is starting to look like the NFT bubble. Nobody know what it is or what it does, but “You gotta have it!”.

That “security layer” is going to be a farce

By ffkom • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Irresponsible people (including irresponsible employees) have evidently shown a lot of interest in automating away all kinds of stuff by installing “OpenClaw” and giving it access to all kinds of sensitive information and credentials to act on their behalf. If you run “OpenClaw” in some sandbox that does not give it access to all that sensitive information and credentials, the purpose of “get it done for me, I cannot be bothered” will not get fulfilled, and therefore that sandbox will either be intentionally be circumvented or the bot becomes useless in comparison to what people (ab)use OpenClaw for. No kind of “security layer” can change that.

New form of absurdity

By Big Hairy Gorilla • Score: 3 Thread
Does anyone know why we want this ? Grampa wants to know.

Social media for robots? Futurama guy, random quote required here.

Polymarket Gamblers Threaten To Kill Journalist Over Iran Missile Story

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Times of Israel, written by journalist Emanuel Fabian:
On Tuesday, March 10, a massive explosion shook the city of Beit Shemesh, just outside Jerusalem, in yet another Iranian ballistic missile attack during the ongoing war. Rescue services scrambled to the scene in search of possible casualties, though as it turned out, the projectile had struck a forested area just outside the city, around 500 meters from homes. On The Times of Israel’s liveblog that day, I reported that the missile had hit an open area and no injuries were caused, citing the rescue services, as well as footage that emerged showing the massive explosion caused by the missile’s warhead. But what I thought was a seemingly minor incident during the war has turned into days of harassment and death threats against me.
Emanuel began receiving numerous emails, messages and phone calls from individuals urging him to change the report to say the missile had been intercepted. “It was indeed a little strange to receive the same question, about something relatively inconsequential, from two different people within a day,” he said. The connection eventually became clear after he noticed two users on X responding to his story with apparent ties to Polymarket. “There are people saying that they have received word from you that the missile strike in Beit Shemesh on March 10th was in fact intercepted, is this true or did no such interaction occur?” one user wrote. Another asked, “Was there any video of the actual impact?”
The rules of this particular Polymarket bet state: “This market will resolve to ‘Yes’ if Iran initiates a drone, missile, or air strike on Israel’s soil on the listed date in Israel Time (GMT+2). Otherwise, this market will resolve to ‘No’.” However, there is a clause: “Missiles or drones that are intercepted… will not be sufficient for a ‘Yes’ resolution, regardless of whether they land on Israeli territory or cause damage.”

At that point, Emanuel realized his “minor report” of a missile strike had suddenly become part of a “betting war,” with traders who had wagered ‘No’ on an Iranian strike on Israel on March 10 pressuring him to change the article so they could win their bets.

When he refused, some of the Polymarket gamblers escalated to harassment, fabricated messages, bribery attempts, and explicit threats against him and his family. “You have no idea how much you’ve put yourself at risk,” wrote a user named Haim. “Today is the most significant day of your career. You have two choices: either believe that we have the capabilities, and after you make us lose $900,000 we will invest no less than that to finish you. Or end this with money in your pocket, and also earn back the life you had until now.”

After receiving no response, Haim sent him another series of messages: “You are choosing to go to war knowing that you will lose your life as you’ve grown accustomed to it — for nothing.” He later added: “You have exactly a few hours left to fix your attempt at influencing [the market]. It would be stupid of you to ignore this.” According to Emanuel, the messages also included detailed threats referencing his neighborhood, parents, and family.

Re:Can we …

By quonset • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… start a betting pool for how long Haim will be imprisoned?

In Israel, about the only thing which will put you in jail is killing the Prime Minister. Not raping prisoners until they bleed, not stealing someone’s home from under them, not being filmed driving a bulldozer onto another nation’s land and killing a citizen.

In fact, the Israeli army will even help you destroy someone elses crops.

As for Haim going to jail, not gonna happen in any situation.

Re:So the Iranians should bet on ‘no’

By cusco • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Only a minority of Iranians are now muslims of any sect

[Citation Needed]

Really. I’ve never heard any such thing except from the fanatics who think everyone would be a Mormon/Baptist/Wahabist/Hindu/whatever if they only “knew the truth”.

Re:Meal Team Six: The Keyboard Warrior Chronicles.

By ClickOnThis • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Trading is not gambling, even with derivatives such as options and futures. They’re more like insurance policies than gambling bets. You can get in or out by opening or closing your position whenever you want. Not so with gambling: you’re committed once you place your bet. Well, wait … Polymarket does in fact allow people to open or close positions before the deciding event occurs, so maybe Polymarket isn’t gambling?

As for borrowed money (i.e., margin), brokerage houses limit how much you can trade with it: typically from 25% to 30% of your positions in tax-unsheltered accounts can be margined at most. Only about 10% of retail investors use margin, and institutional investors tend to use options to leverage positions, not borrowed funds. So, it’s not nothing, but not huge either. Outlawing trading on borrowed funds wouldn’t “shut stock and futures markets down in a heartbeat.”

Re:Meal Team Six: The Keyboard Warrior Chronicles.

By Samantha Wright • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That is ideal. Economic growth is not an unqualified net positive for society, and lending is the root cause of most of its ills. With borrowing as it is practised by hegemons today, there are only two endings: either they must close the loop, using the dirty money to architect a revenue-extracting monster that milks non-borrowed money to pay off the debts, or the system collapses under its own weight, like Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme in the 2008 financial crisis. Debt creates its own incentives to abuse the commons and impoverish the public.

Of course, not being content with abusing the commons, there are also implications for abuse of single wealthy lenders, too. It would also effectively outlaw short-selling, since that consists of borrowing assets—the items being traded—then destroying the price, and pocketing the difference. If you think about it, this isn’t even adding value to the economy; it’s just skimming value off the inventory of whomever you’re borrowing from.

If anyone tried this with a physical asset the lender would be apoplectic: “You borrowed 50 cars from me, sold them, destroyed the market for that model, and bought them back at a pittance. Now my inventory of 1,000 cars of the same model is worth a thousand pittances! Why would I ever do business with you ever again?!”—it only works as a system if the lender assumes that the assets will recover value over time, but the degenerate gambler doing the borrowing is incentivised to outright ruin the assets they’re borrowing beyond any hope of recovery. In a sense they’re even less ethical than corporate raiders, since both the company who issued the stock and the lender are being abused.

Re:Why Polymarket shouldn’t exist

By ceoyoyo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It’s small potatoes compared to things like fleecing his followers and taking bribes from oil rich states.

His kids though, they’ve thought of it.

Encyclopedia Britannica Sues OpenAI For Copyright, Trademark Infringement

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Encyclopedia Britannica has sued OpenAI, alleging its AI models were trained on nearly 100,000 copyrighted articles and sometimes reproduce or misattribute passages to the encyclopedia. The lawsuit also claims trademark infringement and argues tools like ChatGPT divert traffic away from Britannica and Merriam-Webster sites. Engadget reports:
More specifically, Britannica alleged that OpenAI illegally used its “copyrighted content at a massive scale” when training its AI models. Not just with training, the encyclopedia company claimed that ChatGPT’s responses to user queries sometimes contain “full or partial verbatim reproductions of [Britannica’s] copyright articles.”

Along with claims of copyright violations, Britannica argued that OpenAI was also responsible for trademark infringement. According to the lawsuit, ChatGPT generates “made-up content or ‘hallucinations’ and falsely attributes them” to Encyclopedia Britannica. The lawsuit doesn’t specify an amount for monetary damages, but Britannica is also seeking an injunction to prevent OpenAI from repeating these accusations.

All your everything are belong to us…

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Given today’s regulatory environment, Encyclopedia Britannica may as well be howling at the moon for all the good this suit will do them. Big Tech increasingly engages in de facto governance, with the tacit permission of the elected government. And even if there’s the possibility of getting a favourable court ruling, EB will be mired in an endless litany of appeals that they probably don’t have enough money to see through to the end.

It’s the Golden Rule, as in ‘he who has the gold makes the rules’. God I hate the corporatocracy.

Re:All your everything are belong to us…

By SumDog • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
> In the US we have been watching state of state pass age verification rules etc, despite big tech howling

What? Big tech WANTS age verification. That should be pretty obvious by now. Who do you think is lobbying for it? If big tech didn’t want it, it would be crushed. Age verification benefits Palentir, Meta, Microsoft, Google, Oracle and many others. It’s NOT about age verification. It’s the first step towards full digital identification and removal of all anonymity.

> The courts have forced open the app stores.

Nope. Their court order effectively does nothing when Google retaliates by forcing everyone who wants to make a distributable Android app send Google their fucking Government ID!

https://keepandroidopen.org/

I Hope They Win

By machineghost • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The AI companies have been acting like Uber (ie. breaking existing laws with the assumption they’re “too big to catch”).

However, this is as clear of a case of copyright violation as there could be. I hope Britannica wins!

Britannica is an AI company itself now

By EvilSS • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
They are pushing back against competition from Open AI and others, but not for the reason many think:

While it still offers an online edition of its encyclopedia, as well as the Merriam-Webster dictionary, Britannica’s biggest business today is selling online education software to schools and libraries, the software it hopes to supercharge with AI. …

Britannica’s CEO Jorge Cauz also told the Times about the company’s Britannica AI chatbot, which allows users to ask questions about its vast database of encyclopedic knowledge that it collected over two centuries from vetted academics and editors. The company similarly offers chatbot software for customer service use cases.

Britannica told the Times it is expecting revenue to double from two years ago, to $100 million.

https://gizmodo.com/encycloped…

They are pinning their future on providing AI products trained on their encyclopedias and research notes, putting them in somewhat direct competition with the other AI companies.

Apple Launches AirPods Max 2 With Better ANC, Live Translation

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Apple has quietly announced the AirPods Max 2, featuring improved active noise cancellation, an H2 chip, and new features like adaptive audio and AI-powered real-time translation. Like the original model, these headphones start at $549. The Verge reports:
As noted by Apple, the AirPods Max 2 offer active noise-cancellation that’s 1.5 times more effective when compared to its predecessor. Transparency mode, which allows you to hear your surroundings while wearing the headphones, also sounds “more natural” with the AirPods Max 2, according to Apple.

The AirPods Max 2 support 24-bit, 48kHz lossless audio when connected with a USB-C cable, as well as offer up to 20 hours of listening time on a single charge. Other capabilities include loud sound reduction, a camera remote feature that works by pressing the digital crown to take a photo or start a recording, as well as a personalized volume feature that “automatically fine-tunes the listening experience” based on your preferences over time.

Re:My biggest problem with the AirPods Max 1…

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Modding you down for ignoring your cats.

Better ANC,

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

I think the African National Congress went downhill after the death of Nelson Mandela, so no doubt the Apple fans in South Africa will appreciate that.

Meta Signs $27 Billion AI Infrastructure Deal With Nebius

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
AI infrastructure company Nebius signed a deal to provide up to $27 billion in AI computing capacity to Meta over the next five years, including a guaranteed $12 billion purchase by 2027. Reuters reports:
Under the agreement, Meta will also buy an additional $15 billion worth of capacity planned by Nebius over the coming five years if it is not sold to other customers, giving the contract a total value of up to $27 billion, Nebius said. The deal is the latest example of U.S. tech giants’ efforts to supplement their own AI data-centre build-outs by locking in scarce GPU and power capacity from “neocloud” providers like Nebius. Nebius CEO Arkady Volozh said the latest Meta deal would help “accelerate the build-out and growth of our core AI cloud business.”
Further reading: Data Centers Overtake Offices In US Construction-Spending Shift

Great news, but…

By TwistedGreen • Score: 3 Thread

What does Meta need all this AI compute capacity for? Running Moltbook at scale?

Re:Great news, but…

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Informative Thread

What does Meta need all this AI compute capacity for? Running Moltbook at scale?

You need a *LOT* of datacenters to refactor all data available on the internetwebz every couple months when they release a new model.

Fact check for Meta

By gtall • Score: 3 Thread

You screwed up and actually you signed a $27 Billion deal with Nebulous. It pays to read the fine print and not have a dolt for a CEO.

Data Centers Overtake Offices In US Construction-Spending Shift

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg:
Spending on data center projects in the U.S. has exploded, surpassing offices for the first time at the end of last year. It’s a trend Matt Kunz saw early on when Meta built a computing hub outside Columbus, Ohio. Other tech companies soon swarmed into the area, drawn by its stable economy, university talent pipeline and ample power, water and land, said Kunz, vice president and general manager at Turner Construction Co., the firm that led Meta’s build-out. Since Meta broke ground in 2017, it’s expanded its data center campus, and Amazon.com Inc., Alphabet Inc.‘s Google and Microsoft Corp. made plans to join it nearby.

“When one shows up, almost all the other ones tend to follow,” Kunz said. For Turner, a construction giant responsible for supertall office skyscrapers, sports stadiums and cultural venues around the globe, data centers are commanding more of its bandwidth. The company completed $9.4 billion of the projects last year, more than five times its 2020 total. Last month, Turner announced it was chosen as one of the contractors on a $10 billion data center for Meta in Indiana. Tech companies’ needs for AI processing facilities have made data centers the latest darling of the real estate industry. The properties are figuring heavily into portfolios of major investors such as Blackstone, Brookfield Asset Management and KKR, on a bet that long-term demand for computing power will continue to grow. At the same time, office development has slowed as cities across the U.S. contend with vacancies that have piled up since the Covid lockdowns.

Construction spending for data centers has climbed steadily in recent years, while outlays for general office projects headed downward, U.S. Census data show. The two crossed paths in December, with roughly $3.57 billion spent on data centers that month, compared with $3.49 billion for offices, according to preliminary estimates. The shift is likely to continue and “may perpetuate itself even further as AI is utilized for automating day-to-day jobs,” said Andy Cvengros, co-lead of U.S. data center markets for the brokerage Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. “It’s going to directly impact the amount of office space people need.”
According to Christopher McFadden, senior vice president at Turner, more than a third of the company’s backlog is now tied to data centers.
“We’re going to be building these at this scale for years to come,” McFadden said. “There’s a lot of wind in the sail.”

Not surprised really

By alvinrod • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Is this at all surprising when there’s a lot of empty office space in many large cities? Unless a business is looking to build somewhere new, there’s very little reason to put up a new office building when there’s a lot of available space at the moment.

We’re going to be building these…

By Tailhook • Score: 3 Thread

We’re going to be building these at this scale for years to come

LOL.

Prophetic much?

When this one pops, it’s going to be biblical.

On the bright side

By nedlohs • Score: 3 Thread

New office space is at least one thing we need less of than new data centers.

Humans Out, AI In

By Snowdog • Score: 3 Thread

AKA workplaces for AI are replacing workplaces for humans.

Court Rules TCL’s ‘QLED’ TVs Aren’t Truly QLED

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
A German court ruled that TCL misled consumers by marketing certain TVs as “QLED" when they “do not deliver the color reproduction expected from QLED TVs.” It has ordered the company to stop advertising or selling those models in Germany. TechRadar reports:
The case was filed by Samsung, which claimed that TCL was running deceptive advertising, and more court cases on the same topic are coming in other countries, including the US. The lawsuits all make the same claim: that what TCL calls a QLED isn’t a QLED as it’s commonly understood, and that consumers are being mis-sold TVs as a result. The court found that TCL’s quantum dot TVs, such as the QLED870 series available in Germany, didn’t deliver the characteristics of a quantum dot LED, and that consumers were being misled as a result.

The tests were commissioned by Seoul chemicals company Hansol Chemical (which, it’s worth noting, works with Samsung, a key TCL rival, and which heavily promoted the results of these tests alongside launching the court case) and carried out by Geneva’s SGS and the UK’s Intertek. According to ET News (via Google Translate), “no indium (In) or cadmium (Cd) was detected in three TCL QD TV models. Indium and cadmium are essential materials that cannot be omitted for QD implementation… if neither is present, QD technology cannot be said to have been applied.” You can see the test results here.

TCL disputed the findings — “The QD content may vary depending on the supplier, but it definitely contains cadmium,” it responded — and published its own tests, including a test by SGS, the same firm that conducted tests for Hansol. The results contradicted Hansol Chemical’s tests, but those tests used a different methodology: where TCL’s tests focused on TCL’s quantum dot films, Hansol’s commissioned tests were on finished TCL TVs. […] Hansol Chemical has filed a complaint against TCL with the US Federal Trade Commission, alleging false advertising, and TCL is also facing class action lawsuits in several US states making the same claim. TCL isn’t alone here: Hisense has also been targeted in the US.

The finding is not comprehensive

By sentiblue • Score: 3 Thread
If the claim was all true then it’s not just a misleading advertising. Customers paid for QLED quality and didn’t get it. The company must be forced to pay back to all affected consumers worldwide, once all the lawsuits in various countries finalize.

Pot calling kettle black

By anoncoward69 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Common we all knew they choose the term QLED to at quick glance make people think they were getting an OLED TVs.

So customers were mis-LED?

By Cyrano de Maniac • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Couldn’t restrain myself. The entire point of my post is in the subject line.