Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. 2,000 Retired Google Pixel Phones Get a Second Life As a Private Cloud
  2. Ubisoft Co-Founder Claude Guillemot Dies In Plane Crash
  3. Several US States Bet That AI Can Solve Their Prison Recidivism Crisis
  4. ‘Tutor’ Who Took Online Tests for 124 Students Jailed for Three Years
  5. TikTok Shows 3x More AI Slop Than YouTube, Report Finds
  6. Someone Forked systemd Over Its New Birth Date Field
  7. The Secret Revolution in Battery Technology: 3-D Printing
  8. Is Tesla Planning To Sell Modular AI Data Center Hardware?
  9. UK Official Promises Statements ‘Around VPNs’ and Further Teen Restrictions on Chatbots and Social Media
  10. Cops Keep Getting Arrested for Using Flock’s Cameras to Stalk People
  11. After Six Years Of Work and Over 360 Patches, Linux 7.2 Finally Removes Bug-Prone strncpy
  12. US Bill Would Mandate AI Chip Location Tracking to Thwart China and Other Adversaries
  13. The Rust Ecosystem Gets an AI Security Engineer in Residence
  14. Canonical’s Upcoming AI Tool: Talk to Ubuntu Instead of Typing
  15. New Super PAC Aims to Rally Tech Workers to Help Limit AI: ‘the Guardrails Alliance’

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

2,000 Retired Google Pixel Phones Get a Second Life As a Private Cloud

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
UC San Diego researchers are working with Google to build a private cloud from 2,000 retired Pixel Fold motherboards, demonstrating how discarded smartphones could provide useful, low-cost computing capacity. “The full smartphone cluster is expected to launch this fall,” reports The Register. “Depending on how well the initial phase goes, we’re told the cluster could grow even larger.” From the report
Once the phone’s motherboards have been extracted from their shells, the researchers say that the chips hiding within remain more than potent enough to be useful for a variety of tasks. In many cases, the single-threaded performance of these chips is as good as, if not better than, what you’d find from a many-cored datacenter chip. The Pixel Fold smartphones, which will form the basis of the cluster, are powered by a Google Tensor G2 processor with two 2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, two 2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 and four 1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 Arm cores, a Mali-G710 MP7 GPU, and 12 GB of system memory. Early benchmarking using the SPEC suite suggests that 25-50 phones should deliver performance similar to that of a conventional server.

The major challenge, instead, is distributing workloads across multiple devices, each of which has a handful of cores of one or more varieties, and most have 8-12 GB of memory. UCSD researchers are approaching this challenge from a couple of different angles. The first is by targeting applications that can easily fit within a single device. The second is using Kubernetes to orchestrate container deployments across clusters of 25-50 phones. For this to work, the devices first need to be flashed with a Linux operating system suitable for the job. While Android makes for a great handheld experience, it is not intended for server duty. In the blog post, researchers note that Android includes functionality intended to stop rogue applications from chewing up excessive amounts of memory and draining your battery. In server context, these safety mechanisms are no longer necessary.

[Ryan Kastner, an associate professor of computer science at UCSD] told us this was by no means an easy task, but the team has made steady progress toward getting Linux running smoothly on these devices, including support for the phone’s onboard GPUs. Access to some functionality, like the chip’s integrated tensor processing unit, remains elusive. Clustering these devices will require networking the phones together. Normally these devices would connect over cellular or Wi-Fi, but at this scale, this not only isn’t practical, but also has implications for security, he explained. Instead, the team will employ PCBs that both supply power and break out wired Ethernet networking.

The researchers suggest that many EdTech, grading, and research workloads commonly run by universities in the cloud are small enough to run on the cluster without issue. “The vast majority of these applications are within the capabilities of a single smartphone to host, with the standard grading backend running on small cloud instances,” a blog post detailing the planned deployment reads. “Early experiments show that even a moderately-sized cluster of 20 phones is capable of supporting peak submission rates for a 75+ student class.”

Memory prices

By gurps_npc • Score: 3 Thread

Given that the price of memory is so high that cell phone production is dropping like a stone, it is clear to me that used cellphones will end up being worth a lot more - both for this kind of networked computing and merely to remove and reuse parts

Ubisoft Co-Founder Claude Guillemot Dies In Plane Crash

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
Claude Guillemot, co-founder of French video game company Ubisoft, died Friday at the age of 69. According to French media (via Bloomberg), Guillemot died in a plane crash in the French resort town of La Baule. He was one of two people aboard the plane, both of whom died.

Guillemot founded Ubisoft with his four brothers in 1986. Since then, the company has published the Assassin’s Creed, Far Cry, Prince of Persia, and Tom Clancy video game franchises, as well as many other titles. The family retains control of Ubisoft, and Guillemot’s brother Yves is still CEO. Guillemot was also chairman of Guillemot Corp., which makes gaming and audio accessories.
“Ubisoft was deeply saddened to learn of the death of Claude Guillemot, co-founder of the group and chairman of Guillemot Corp., in an accident,” Ubisoft said in a statement. “Our thoughts are with his family and loved ones during this difficult time. No further statements will be made at this time.”

Several US States Bet That AI Can Solve Their Prison Recidivism Crisis

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
America’s state prison systems need ways “to keep people from returning to prison,” reports the Wall Street Journal, “when an estimated 40% end up back behind bars within three years.”
Part of the problem comes in the form of filing cabinets, manila folders and legacy digital databases. In other words, records for a single prisoner might be kept in a dozen places… Now a group of 19 prison systems are tackling the problem with digital tools and artificial intelligence in some cases. They are contracting with San Francisco nonprofit Recidiviz, whose computer systems bring together prisoner data from its disparate sources into digital dashboards. From there, corrections staff can see information — such as court records and notes from parole-board hearings — about a prisoner or parolee all in one place.

The company says its efforts are working: Recidivism has fallen 16% in the prison population its systems track. It is the result of “just streamlining these workflows and knitting someone’s journey together end to end,” says Clementine Jacoby, chief executive officer of Recidiviz. Some criminal-justice groups show that recidivism is trending downward in general, though most of that data is nearly a decade old… The statistics from 11 states stop at 2019, and for four states stop at 2016. With 10 other states, no data was reported.

Sounds like AI isn’t really a significant part…

By Junta • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The story makes pretty clear that they’ve been working this a long while, before at least the current hyped LLM was available.

To the extent “AI” might even play a role given their timeline, it was stuff that was pretty useless. People tried unleashing machine learning on these sorts of records and it just didn’t do much.

Sounds like it’s just a run at modernizing records keeping and access, which is fine.

Here’s a thought

By jenningsthecat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

According to Wikipedia, the US has the fifth highest incarceration rate in the world, at 549 per 100,000: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… . Canada - the country next door which is very similar in broad cultural terms - comes in at almost exactly one sixth of that number. So maybe the States might get serious about addressing the huge social and institutional forces which are largely responsible for that discrepancy?

A good start might be to make prisons NOT part of the for-profit private sector. This incentive to ‘create’ prisoners seems to be a contagion which has spread into policing and the whole justice system. Then you could maybe fix the public education system and introduce universal healthcare. Again, a major culprit here is having ceded care of public-good institutions to for-profit interests. These jobs are neither simple nor easy - but they need to be done.

Huge corporations whose number one mandate is to maximize profit and shareholder return at the expense of all else - are a worldwide problem. We all need to be fighting that fight. And it seems that the US needs to be fighting it more than most other countries.

We know how, just don’t want to.

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The nordic prison system has a recidivism rate is 20% within the first 2 years and about 25% within 5 years. The US system is 39% within 3 years.

Why don’t we use something closer to Norways?

Because the Conservatives call it ‘soft on crime’. They have 3 levels of prison: High, Low and Transition. The Low Security prison they use for non-violent first time offenders is what the GOP calls a ‘country club’ type with private rooms, lots of classes, library and therapy.

You only get their High Security if you were violent or become violent in the Low Security prison.

They also have a half way house/ transition system where they live in a prison but are allowed to go to work outside.

But this is clearly not “Hard on Crime”, so Americans refuse to use it.

Note, in my opinion the “Hard on Crime” approach fails because normal prison is hard on crime so when someone claims to be Hard on Crime, what they end up doing is:

1) Push Judges and Police to be hard on SUSPECTS, resulting in more false accusations and more time in Jail waiting for a trial - both of which encourage people to commit more crimes.

2) Push newbie criminals to make friends in jail with the criminals as the guards are cruel and dismissive of the prisoner’s concerns.

3) Prevent criminals from getting training and other resources they need while in prison, resulting in a much harder time getting out of the criminal life.

Re:Betteidge’s law

By lucifuge31337 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
There’s also another thing at play for the ones who would be otherwise redeemable: most prisons are hellholes of punishment, not rehabilitation. If you choose to run a system that way do not be surprised that the likely outcome of people who have been in the system for any real lengh of time is recidivism.

Re:We know how, just don’t want to.

By torkus • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Get back to me when places like NY and CA stop letting repeat violent offenders out on ‘cashless’ bail.

If you’re accused of assaulting someone for the 2nd (or 3rd and more) time before your first case even makes it to court, you should not be free to continue your rampage.

Equally, we should not make any conviction a lifetime sentence of un-/under-employment. People need the ability to rejoin society and a normal, productive person who made a mistake.

Lastly, when a significant portion of the money spent on prisons is going to corporate profits, we are doing something very very wrong. It’s a race to the bottom for everyone but the shareholders.

‘Tutor’ Who Took Online Tests for 124 Students Jailed for Three Years

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A private tutor who charged money to take dozens of exams for students and submit coursework for them “has been jailed for three years,” reports the BBC, “after his scam earned him £300,000.”
Shahid Adnan completed assignments and online tests for more than 120 students at Liverpool John Moore’s University, the Crown Prosecution Service said. The 43-year-old, of Lysander Close, Liverpool, was caught in February 2023 after a student handed in a USB drive containing suspicious coursework to Dr Tom Berry of the university’s school of computer science and mathematics. Berry’s checks revealed the drive was used by Adnan with documents linked to a company he set up called Study Sharp Ltd.

Excel spreadsheets containing details of other students, their study modules, coursework due dates, and their personal login credentials were also found. Further checks confirmed suspicions that Adnan was accessing the university’s network to submit fraudulent work and sit examinations on behalf of students… [I]nvestigations led police to believe Adnan may have been doing work for 124 students at universities all over the world.
The BBC also interviewed detective sergeant Adam Dagnall from Merseyside Police’s cybercrime unit, who said Adnan was living a lavish lifestyle “well beyond” his stated occupations as a private tutor and Amazon delivery driver. His bank accounts held more than £2m ($2,645,100 USD).

Re:Does this mean Sam Altman’s going to prison?

By gijoel • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Not really, cheating on exams can tarnish academic integrity and is a menace to society at large. Do you want to have heart surgery performed by someone who didn’t know their shit, and cheated on their exams? Do you want to drive over a bridge design by a guy who doesn’t understand structural analysis, or be represented by someone who faked their way through law school?

Besides which academic reputation is worth a lot to university and colleges, and they know it. If they didn’t stomp on this now their reputation will turn to shit, and no one will want to enroll there. That can have a big impact on enrollment numbers and by extension their bottom line.

Lastly, why the fuck should someone too lazy to do the work do as well as or better than someone who busted their balls studying for those subjects?

Crime details

By tiananmen tank man • Score: 3 Thread

So he got 3 years for logging in to a computer system with credentials that weren’t his and money laundering

Why is a person at university?

By Bruce66423 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The ideal answer is that the person is really interested in the subject they are studying and want to know a lot more.

The honest answer is that society forces them to go to university as the next step towards a high paying job. The fact that it’s also a chance to PARTY is probably also significant!

For the person whose only motivation is the latter, then the logic of cheating is overwhelming; they don’t really believe that they need the stuff they are being taught, so why bother to play nicely?

The AI challenge, on top of the pandemic’s revelation that an awful lot can be done on line, is raising all these hard questions which nobody wants to face. However to some extent it is merely clarifying the questions which were already being raised about the degree to which a university education has become a weapon in the arms race of getting the first job. Once you start to see the university industry as arms salesmen in a war, it’s a lot easier to disregard their self serving claims to be making a meaningful contribution to our culture. Of course SOME are doing things of value - especially in STEM - but overall?

Perhaps the answer is for major companies to announce that they are going to recruit high school graduates with good SATs results for in house apprenticeships that will lead to management. Unfortunately most seem to be continuing to use a degree as the first jump for candidates to get over…

Re:Does this mean Sam Altman’s going to prison?

By dargaud • Score: 5, Informative Thread

[…] Do you want to have heart surgery performed by someone who didn’t know their shit, and cheated on their exams? Do you want to drive over a bridge design by a guy who doesn’t understand structural analysis, or be represented by someone who faked their way through law school? […]

Indeed. It is a well known ‘secret’ that other student(s) took Trumps’ finals in his place, paid for by his father. The world would be a much better place if this particular scam hadn’t happened. Here on finals they check your identity papers (real ones, not an easily fakeable driver’s license).

Consequences?

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Are the people that had achieved degrees and other certification in a fraudulent fashion going to be stripped of those and potentially fired or expelled?

This is not an isolated incident and there have been many stories of people achieving via fraudulent means and consequently we are all worse off for it. IMO they need to be named and shamed. Stripped of whatever they gained by cheating.

Many years ago we had a new guy with a Masters in networking. Didn’t know what are the network ranges for class A, B or C were. Couldn’t say what the difference is between TCP & UDP. Had no idea about subnetting etc etc. His masters seemed more related to social networking.

Ultimately an individual that gets certified or qualified in a fraudulent fashion is genuinely cheating themselves. They always run the risk of ventually getting found out and sometimes in very embarrassing fashion.

P.S. - we trained LLMs on human data…is it a wonder why they are sometimes dishonest?

TikTok Shows 3x More AI Slop Than YouTube, Report Finds

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“About 59% of TikTok videos served to a new account’s For You feed are AI slop,” writes Search Engine Journal, “according to a report from Kapwing, the video creation tool company. That’s roughly three times the rate Kapwing found on YouTube.”
The company manually reviewed over 10,000 TikTok videos across 20 categories and ran a separate fresh-account test, counting AI-generated content in the first 500 For You videos. Kapwing ran the same fresh-account test on YouTube and found that 104 of the first 500 Shorts, or 21%, were AI slop. On TikTok, 294 of 500 For You videos hit that threshold…

Of the 2,000 videos Kapwing reviewed in TikTok’s Kids category, 57% were AI slop. That was the highest rate of any category in the analysis. The highest-rate tag was #cartoonkids, where 97 of 100 featured videos were AI-generated. Tags like #cartoons and #babysong both reached 83%, and #forkids came in at 79%. After Kids, the next highest AI slop rates were in Science and Education (35%), Health (33%), and History (33%). All three are categories where visual illustration and voiceover narration make up much of the content.

On the other end, categories where on-camera presence or physical demonstration are central had the lowest rates. Fashion came in at 1.3%, Music at 1.5%, and Fitness at 1.6%.
The article notes that by last November, TikTok “had already labeled 1.3 billion videos as AI-generated, according to the report.”

Must be mostly slop then

By caseih • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Because Youtube is about half AI slop these days. At least given the kinds of video topics I might be interested in. It’s kind of discouraging. Some of them actually are now marked as AI generated. I generally stop watching channels that I find or suspect are AI, even if the material appears to be accurate. I just can’t support creators who don’t actually create.

Is this a surprise?

By jenningsthecat • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I’ve never experienced TikTok; but everything I’ve heard leads me to believe that even before AI became so pervasive,` the platform had way, way more slop than YouTube. Presumably, a greater affinity for slop in general implies a greater incidence of AI slop.

I just checked TikTok - they right

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 3 Thread
TikTok indeed is a shithole with a lot of AI slop, way more than I ever run into on YouTube. A whole lot of uncanny valley shit, and a lot of shit past that into more believable quality, but still AI.

TikTok was already Slop !!!

By bsdetector101 • Score: 3 Thread
Hard to say that AI slop made it worse !!!

Doesn’t TikTok Basically Demand You Post Slop?

By jhuebel • Score: 3 Thread

I mean, it’s built on the idea of creating very short form videos. With the advent of 10-second AI video generation, TikTok is basically the perfect fit for it. Someone can just keep feeding AI prompts and indiscriminately posting the resulting videos. There’s almost zero thought process required. But if some of the videos hit… profit! There’s no downside for the AI slop factory.

Someone Forked systemd Over Its New Birth Date Field

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The blog Linuxiac reports:
A new systemd fork has appeared with a specific purpose: removing systemd’s recently added support for storing a user’s birth date in JSON user records.

The fork, called Liberated systemd, published its first tagged release as v261 shortly after the official systemd 261 release. In other words, the fork follows upstream systemd while reverting the change that added the new optional birthDate field.

Importantly, this is not a new init system, a wider redesign of systemd, or a general-purpose alternative to the upstream project. Its stated purpose is to remain close to upstream systemd while removing what the author describes as “surveillance enablement”… The author recommends testing the fork in a virtual machine before using it on real hardware and warns nightly builds are more likely to be unstable than named releases.

Re:Give my my SysVInit

By TaliesinWI • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Uh-huh. So what happens if you run one of the “modules” by itself, like you can do with other Unix/Linux programs?

Re:Does systemd want to wish us happy birthday now

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
It’s possible the systemd team sees the field as a way to make their software more “sticky.” If the data gets stored by systemd, then systemd because a little harder to remove.

That is a horrible development strategy for good software, but it does make the software more likely to remain. The Darwinistic incentive is there for enshittification.

Re:Give my my SysVInit

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Further to that systemd is highly modular. Most of it does not run in PID 1. On my fedora system there are half a dozen individual systemd module packages that can be used or not as the system needs and is designed. systemd is not at all monolithic.

The only people who say that haven’t actually looked at the source code, or are liars. I don’t know which one you are.

At least you didn’t say “Systemd is small”, which it isn’t.

Re:You’ll end up with an empty repository

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
systemd is what happens when a young, arrogant engineer whom tech bloggers decided was a digiterti prophet inflicts the antipattern of reinventing everything and ignoring conventions and standards imposing unreasonable costs on end-users for ego purposes. But look at all of the benefits and pretend none of the downsides exist!

Re: You’ll end up with an empty repository

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Here is the thing both parts are true.

Systemd really does suck. It is a lot of attack surface, it makes a lot of things that would be enjoy some security or at least blast radius control thru heterogeneity systemic risks. It turns a lot of simple failures into complex nightmares that are difficult to untangle. It offers no discoverablity, if you don’t know how the hip bone is connected to tailbone you are not getting there by looking around the system you’ll have to read the docs.

90+ % of what it does was already handled just fine by existing solutions. So for all of those bloggers systemd has a zero value proposition. All suck no blow.

However....

If you trying to run 1000s of containers at scale with piles of micro services on each, actually systemd does give you some useful things. If you are are PaaS platform and you want to support a wide variety of work loads and make them controllable thur you management portals etc, well having some similar OS level control plane for your control plane tools to plug into is kinda of big deal, because otherwise you are looking at specialized code for each OS and maybe each version of OS you want to offer support for.

Instead we get this dynamic, one distro picks up systemD, the PaaS guys pick it up and say hey cool we will support systemD and tell the other distros get with the program or be left behind.

So bloggers are right if you are managing handfuls of servers the old fashion way via ssh, or just admining your own workstation - SystemD SUCKS

If you are some SiValley tech bro looking to piss away a few million VC dollars, systemD or something like it is a necessity and uniformity and adoption level is a way more important than it being any good. It is just the latest iteration of nobody ever got fired choosing IBM, exact same thinking and underlying justifications.

The Secret Revolution in Battery Technology: 3-D Printing

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“There’s a revolution in battery technology hiding in plain sight,” reports The Wall Street Journal. “The 3-D printing of batteries has the potential to put energy storage inside any device.

“This will enable lightweight and long-lasting consumer gadgets, long-range military drones and even nanoscale robots.”
Almost all the innovations we regularly hear about — from cheaper, tougher electric-vehicle batteries to "Holy Grail” solid-state batteries — are about changing the chemistry of batteries. The promise of battery-tech 3-D printing (aka additive manufacturing) is simple: What if batteries could fill any available space, even structural elements of our gadgets, rather than always taking a rigid shape like a pouch or cylinder?

The new approach has obvious appeal. The entire airframe of a drone could be filled with energy storage for increased range. Smartglasses could have sleek battery-packed frames, so they look like everyday eyewear rather than “Revenge of the Nerds” props. One of the biggest advantages of 3-D printing is that it works with any battery, regardless of its cell chemistry. It could advance today’s lithium-ion as well as emerging sodium-ion and solid-state tech… Some [startups] are trying to use 3-D printing to create efficiencies in existing battery manufacturing systems. A brave handful of startups are pursuing radical new designs and approaches. They’re starting with defense applications, where cost and scale are less of an issue…

At Silicon Valley-based Sakuu… [r]ather than trying to 3-D-print whole batteries, the company is working on replacing one of battery manufacturing’s biggest pain points, says Arwed Niestroj, Sakuu’s chief operating officer, who is also a nuclear physicist and former head of Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America. Existing battery assembly lines include football-field-long ovens for drying layers of material that have been dissolved in solvents. This requires a huge amount of energy and is a significant contributor to manufacturing costs, a big reason EV batteries aren’t cheaper. Sakuu’s process, under development for years, uses additive manufacturing to lay down key battery components without solvents, eliminating the need for ovens, says Niestroj.

Sakuu is currently working to commercialize this tech with a major battery manufacturer…

drone battery size

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The entire airframe of a drone could be filled with energy storage for increased range.

Aren’t drone ranges largely limited by weight instead of battery storage space?

Not that easy to put things in 3d prints

By gurps_npc • Score: 3 Thread

The batteries would have to be specially designed to fit in the 3d print. 3d printing by itself is both slower and more expensive than injection molding (unless it is a small run). Throw in custom batteries are you are probably making the items 10x more expensive for a moderate sized job. Economies of scale might work for something we are making in the tens of thousands.

Well, that’s convenient

By Krishnoid • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
So when the battery dies, you can throw the whole device away!

Re:drone battery size

By dinfinity • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Aren’t drone ranges largely limited by weight instead of battery storage space?

Generally, yes. It may make some sense for aerodynamic winged drones, but those generally just use some type of gasoline / jet fuel.
It could make sense for race or other high speed drones like interceptors, where aerodynamic drag is a big factor.

For consumer electronics the legal requirement that batteries must be user replaceable renders this idea dead in the water in the entire EU.

Late to the party

By labnet • Score: 3 Thread

Tesla has already solved the

Existing battery assembly lines include football-field-long ovens for drying layers of material that have been dissolved in solvents.

problem and now using dry process for anode and cathode at scale with their 4680 cells.

Is Tesla Planning To Sell Modular AI Data Center Hardware?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Electrek reports:
Tesla wants to sell modular AI data center hardware, according to a new trademark application for a product called “Megapod.” The filing describes a complete, self-contained computing system for AI workloads…

Tesla filed the “Megapod” trademark (serial number 99893717) with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office this month, through its longtime IP counsel. It’s an intent-to-use application, meaning Tesla is claiming the name for a product it hasn’t launched yet. The goods-and-services description is unusually specific for a trademark. Megapod covers “modular data center hardware systems for artificial intelligence computing, comprised of computer servers, computer hardware for artificial intelligence data processing, networking equipment, power distribution units, and cooling systems.” It also covers “self-contained modular computing hardware systems for artificial intelligence workloads,” integrated platforms sold as a single unit — an enclosure bundling compute, power distribution, and cooling — and downloadable software to monitor, manage, and optimize those systems.

In plain terms: Tesla wants to sell a turnkey AI data center building block. Not a battery, not a chip on its own, but the full rack-and-room of servers, networking, power, and cooling that AI training and inference run on.
Tesla’s offering would have to compete with Nvidia’s liquid-cooled, rack-scale systems that simulates a giant GPU, the article points out. But “The bigger issue is that Tesla has no merchant compute-hardware business to build on.”
Tesla’s own AI training cluster, Cortex at Gigafactory Texas, runs on roughly 67,000 Nvidia H100-equivalent GPUs. In other words, Tesla is one of Nvidia’s customers, not a competitor selling alternative hardware… Where Tesla does have a real AI-data-center business is power, not compute. Its Megapack and new Megablock energy storage products are selling into AI data centers as grid buffers — Musk’s own xAI has bought roughly $1 billion of Megapacks to keep its training runs powered. That energy-storage strength is the one credible thread here. A Megapod that bundles Tesla’s power electronics, thermal management, and the enclosure — the “shell” around the chips rather than the chips themselves — would at least sit adjacent to a business Tesla actually runs.

Pivot!!!

By locater16 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Our current business model is losing it’s massively overvalued hype machine aura, stock holders are starting to ask questions about “finances” and “profits”, pivot to the newest hype bullshit before we have to answer for anything!

Foundry business

By Tailhook • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Not surprising. Tesla is its 5th generation (AI5) processor, currently manufactured by Samsung and TSMC. I suppose they imagine there are others that will want to use these for their own purposes. Musk is creating his own supply of chips for SpaceX at his TX Terafab. Having terrestrial customers to absorb some of the supply and provide revenue as that ramps up the obvious thing to do.

No.

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Betteridge strikes again.

Muskrat bought a bunch of gpus before the AI bubble really got going because he was preemptively pumping the SpaceX stock by shouting look at me I’m buying all this computer hardware for my AI so you know I’m going to make you rich!

He never did anything with any of it because that wasn’t the point. He wasn’t building data centers he was scamming investors.

Now he’s got stacks and stacks of gpus sitting around gathering dust and to keep the stock price pumped for the time being he needs to make it look like he’s going to have a ton of revenue coming in. In practice he’s not and he’s just going to steal all your 401K money but we’re going to get bullshit articles like this because anyone who does real journalism like Patrick Boyle over on YouTube gets fired or demonetized.

If you watch the most recent video from Patrick Boyle and go to the end of the video he explains how the scam works. Initially investors get murdered in by the promise of big fat returns but they can’t sell the stock for the first 120 days as part of the buying agreement. Just one of those investors are at the point where they can sell the stock and it’s likely to crash the rule changes to NASDAQ for SpaceX stock into safe index funds.

Your 401k will be forced to purchase SpaceX stock for the index funds that were the otherwise be safe investments. You will not have the option of not buying SpaceX stock. Eventually your 401k will be full of SpaceX stock and a variety of other rotten AI bullshit stocks that will collapse eliminating the value of your retirement savings.

When this happens the people who saw it coming will still be screwed because there’s nothing they could do about it because the people who didn’t see it coming refused to vote for the kind of reforms that are needed. It doesn’t matter if you realize you’re a crab in a bucket you’re still a crab and a bucket and they’re going to drag you back down every time you try to get out.

There is 10 trillion dollars in 401ks. If you think the thieves that have already created 1 trillionaire are going to stop and leave that money sitting there you’re nuts. That money belongs to them not you. You gave it to them when you kept voting for culture War bullshit instead of boring annoying people like senator Warren who know how to regulate Wall Street

UK Official Promises Statements ‘Around VPNs’ and Further Teen Restrictions on Chatbots and Social Media

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
PC Gamer reports:
The UK government is considering an Australia-style ban on social media for under-16s, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer saying that the ban could take effect as soon as spring next year. As for the much nearer future, Science and Technology Secretary Liz Kendall told BBC Breakfast earlier this week, “We will make further statements in July about VPNs and further restrictions.”

To be clear, no specific restrictions have yet been announced and Kendall sounded somewhat cautious about an outright ban during a parliament debate that took place the same day. “I have commissioned further research about their usage. There are really important issues to balance here,” she says. “Many people want to use VPNs for privacy — that is important — but we know that some children use them to get around restrictions. I will come back to that in July in our response to the consultation.” So, we’ll have to wait until next month for anything definite, but it’s hard not to feel like a full ban on VPNs is already on the table. If that does come to pass, more than the contents of my Bluesky inbox will be at stake.

Utah in the US has already tried to implement a full VPN ban (though this was postponed until September after Aylo, the parent company of Pornhub, challenged the law in court)… [T]he UK could just be the next domino after Utah, potentially setting off a chain reaction that affects users around the world.
The article also argues that age checks can also be a privacy nightmare “with the security breach that exposed the personal info of 70,000 Discord users last year being one case in point.”

Here’s the complete statement from UK Technology Secretary Kendall. “I’ll come back in July with a further statement around VPNs but also additional measures that we want to look at, further restrictions on AI chatbots that parents have found very worrying, more about overnight curfews or breaks in doomscrolling for 16- and 17-year-olds.”

Re:For those who don’t get it…

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Are you going to make Welsh the national language?

That might be necessary if the UK decides to ban vowels next.

Re:A mirror into the future of the West.

By Black Parrot • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

And this is somehow better “In the East”?

No, it’s just that we naively didn’t expect it from “the West”.

Freedom of speech

By TJHook3r • Score: 3 Thread
And here we get to the real issue - VPNs can be used by political activists to have conversations safely. And by ‘activists’ I mean anybody who doesn’t abide by whatever groupthink is in place this week

Makes you wonder

By eneville • Score: 4 Thread

How gov ministers will WFH

Are we about to get a

By hwstar • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

balkanized Internet. One where the ISP’s won’t route to known VPN’s.

Will ISP’s require a security handshake locked to a person’s biometrics for each computer in a household to determine whether it is permitted to visit certain web sites? Won’t this just ID everyone using that computer? I guess that would mean the end of anonymous speech, and the beginning of a total control by the government.

Cops Keep Getting Arrested for Using Flock’s Cameras to Stalk People

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
404 Media remembers how a Florida police office looked up his ex-girlfriend’s license plate in the Flock automated license plate reader system at least 69 times in 2024 — even searching for her mom’s license plate at least 24 times. The police office was charged with stalking and hacking-related offenses, serving one day in prison with five years of probation — but his case “was not a one-off.” [Alternate link via Bruce Schneier]
Local news reports from around the country repeatedly detail police abusing the Flock surveillance system in order to stalk their partners or ex-partners. The contours of each story are much the same, with the police officer in question using their access to the system to repeatedly track a specific person over the course of weeks or months. The cases highlight the fact that Flock can be used to track the whereabouts of individual people, that police do not get a warrant in order to use the system, and that, if they have access to the system, they have the technical ability to look up any license plate they want for any reason they want. An April study by the civil rights group Institute for Justice found that at least 18 police officers have been caught around the country using Flock to stalk a romantic interest in the last few years; another database, called the ALPR Abuse Library, has documented 20 specific cases of “stalking/targeting” around the country.

The known cases of police stalking are almost certainly a vast underreporting of the overall abuse, because they largely include only cases in which the behavior was so egregious that it led to police officers being fired, arrested, or both. Flock told 404 Media that it is “aware of 15 incidents of abuse, each surfaced because of the transparency and accountability features deliberately built into our platform.... There are also 140,000 monthly active users of Flock, so the relatively rare instances of abuse, while obviously wrong and awful, are exactly that — rare,” a Flock spokesperson told 404 Media. [One in 10,000.] “Humans are fallible; unlike most tools society provide law enforcement, Flock ensures that in the instances when our technology is misused, the evidence used to hold responsible parties accountable, is right there in our system. We also encourage all our customers to have a usage policy, regular training, and to implement our Audit Assistance tool, which proactively flags unintended use....”

But it is also the case that Flock has strenuously fought against lawsuits and potential regulations that are seeking to require police to get a warrant to use the system. And many cases of abuse have not been detected by police departments themselves but by those private citizens, journalists, and stalking victims who have found patterns of abuse in public records files they have obtained from their local police departments. In most cases of Flock-related stalking reviewed by 404 Media, the abuse occurred over the course of months or years, and the victims were subjected to dozens or hundreds of lookups. Other abuse cases have been discovered using the website HaveIBeenFlocked.com, a website that compiles Flock searches released via public records requests and turns them into a searchable database. Flock has repeatedly tried to get that website taken down, as we have previously reported.

We have to ban these

By memory_register • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

As Lord Acton said: Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

We give a lot of surveillance power to law enforcement already. Adding this temptation is stupid and will not solve the crime problems.

If you have nothing to hide…

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
You may still have a toxic piece of shit to hide from.

Cheap = abused.

By gurps_npc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The real problem is that the use of the Flock system is cheap. If the cops had to pay $1,000 per search request I guarantee that a police officer would become a gate keeper ensuring that each and every request was valid.

Re: Cheap = abused.

By DeanonymizedCoward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

But, then we get all the complaints about all the cops say it’s not worthwhile to track down felony shoplifters because the searches cost too much.

Won’t you think of the cats and dogs?!They’re eating the cats and dogs over there and there’s nothing we can do to stop them because we don’t have the budget to search their license plates.

ACAB

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Some cops are bad cops. Some cops are presumably not-bad, but have done a piss poor job of policing the bad cops.

“The rotten apple spoils his companion.” — Poor Richard’s almanack, 1736

After Six Years Of Work and Over 360 Patches, Linux 7.2 Finally Removes Bug-Prone strncpy

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Tech Times reports:
Linux 7.2’s merge window closed out a cleanup campaign on Friday that most kernel developers had stopped expecting to see end: the complete removal of strncpy(), a C string-copy function that the kernel’s own documentation labels “actively dangerous,” from every subsystem, driver, and architecture-specific file in the kernel source tree.

The merge landed June 20, 2026. After around 362 commits spread across six years of incremental work, no call site using the function remained, and the function itself — including the last per-CPU-architecture optimized implementations — was struck from the source. The removal matters beyond housekeeping. strncpy() is a persistent source of a specific class of memory error: kernel buffers that contain sensitive data can leak bytes past an unterminated string boundary, a pattern that enables memory disclosure vulnerabilities. Eliminating the function from the tree removes that entire class from the kernel’s attack surface — and, critically, makes strncpy() unavailable to any future contributor, turning a best-practice suggestion into an enforced policy.
Phoronix notes it’s replaced by five different functions:
In place of strncpy, Linux kernel code should use strscpy() for NUL terminated destinations, strscpy_pad() for NUl-terminated destinations with zero-padding, strtomem_pad() for non-NUL-terminated fixed-width fields, memcpy_and_pad() for bounded copies with explicit padding, or memcpy() for known-length memory copies.
“The reason five functions were needed,” explains Tech Times, “is that different parts of the kernel were using strncpy() for five semantically distinct memory operations — each with a different intent, different termination requirement, and different padding behavior. "
The original function obscured all of those differences under a single ambiguous name. The 362-commit campaign to replace it was, in effect, a codebase-wide audit that forced every call site to declare its actual intent in code That is an engineering outcome with lasting value: the kernel’s string-handling semantics are now explicit where they were previously implicit, and future maintainers can read a function name and understand what a copy operation actually does.

Re:C (and here are somemore chars to satisfy the b

By AuMatar • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Why would you do that? If you’re using it for non-strings, you’d never have used strncpy, you’d have used memcpy. Which is the same thing without the null termination rules of strncpy. You’d never use the str versions unless actually working on strings.

Go Janitors!

By bill_mcgonigle • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I see so many names in the commit logs, but some standouts include: Blum, Cook, Torvalds, Solodai, Tyragu, Stitt, Bergmann, Wysocki, Panda, de Mello, and no doubt some I missed who have a large number of commits fixing this problem.

Thank to all who undertook this Herculean chore!

Re:C (and here are somemore chars to satisfy the b

By tlhIngan • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

C doesn’t have strings, but sometimes people like to have some bytes with a 0 on the end. Some of the memxxx() functions are useful with C’s fake strings. For example, memchr() is good for when you have a null-terminated string but it also some upper bounds. And stuff like strncpy() doesn’t appear to have anything at all to do with null terminated strings, and is grossly misnamed.

strncpy() copies a string to another location stopping when it reaches a NUL or the end of the buffer.

The problem is the second case doesn’t NUL terminate the string so you either have to make the buffer one smaller and terminate always or terminate always. Or try to handle it. The other problem is ‘n’ is unintuitive - it’s the size of the buffer in characters. Easy peasy with 8-bit chars, not so much for Unicode strings. (UTF-16…)

I’ve personally be more of a fan of the BSD “l” versions - strlcpy and strlcat - both take the size of the target buffer in bytes - so a sizeof() is the proper way to use it, and both properly NUL terminate the string. strlcat has the added benefit that it computes the size it needs to copy based on the existing length of the string, so you can use strlcat() to concatenate a bunch of strings without computing the remaining buffer sizes (as you would in strncat). Luckily the BSD versions are in libbsd because they aren’t in Glibc. Much nicer and much easier to use functions.

Re:Why C is dangerous

By Uecker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

You can use a safe string type in C as many people do and use other language features to get bounds checking in C.
For example: https://godbolt.org/z/4Tn8jaGM…

It is not clear to me why people do not use this more, but I think the constant misinformation that this is not possible in C is not helping.

Re: C (and here are somemore chars to satisfy the

By Cassini2 • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It is surprising how often I encounter strings with NULs in the middle. Bytes have 256 different values, and sooner or later someone wants to transmit all 256 values in what was an ascii text-based conversation. HTTP is a good example. The conversation starts as a normal group of strings, until the header says “Content-Length:" and a bunch of binary data follows later.

Another issue in C is that strings are used for both immutable strings and for string buffers. Java makes it clear that string buffer is going to be something that grows, and a string is immutable. This allows optimizations like keeping the string length and maximum buffer size handy when the buffer is being appended too. C does both functions with the ever present char * type, for better and worse.

US Bill Would Mandate AI Chip Location Tracking to Thwart China and Other Adversaries

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
NBC News reports:
A group of companies that specialize in tracking international shipments of sensitive technologies is backing a Capitol Hill bill that would require America’s most powerful AI chips to incorporate stronger security mechanisms aimed at preventing the chips from reaching China and other adversaries. The letter, signed by six companies, says the Chip Security Act (CSA) would increase American chip companies’ competitiveness and close key loopholes in the U.S. export control regime.

The move clashes with claims from semiconductor lobbying groups that the requirements would constrain America’s booming chip industry. Sent to congressional leadership Thursday morning and seen by NBC News, the dispatch instead argues that more robust security verification would assure chip customers and manufacturers that they are abiding by sensitive restrictions on chip sales. The companies argue that the boosted confidence will “lead to increased sales, faster export approvals, larger transactions, greater access to new markets, and more expansive chip deals.”

Despite U.S. export control laws banning sales of advanced AI chips to certain countries, including China, loopholes in current requirements have allowed billions of dollars’ worth of America’s best AI chips to be sold to entities in third-party countries that can then forward them to China. In just one case in March, the Justice Department charged three people with conspiring to forward $2.5 billion of AI chips to China. The CSA aims to address those loopholes, mandating that chip exporters better track where advanced chips are sent, via either bespoke location-verification hardware or software that can run on existing hardware. That, bill proponents claim, would ensure that sensitive chips could be sold to countries like Malaysia or Indonesia without fear of further transfer to China… Experts say that because chips perform the advanced computations required for frontier AI systems, cutting off access to the chips is crucial to prevent geopolitical rivals from using AI systems for military or economic purposes.

How Adorable

By crunchy_one • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
It’s almost as if the chips in question were being manufactured in the USA.

Re:LOL

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The administration can’t even win a war against algae.

Funny how that is impossible

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I guess the people making laws are still completely unaware that it is not them defining how reality works. Dumb and dumber …

Re:How Adorable

By anonymouscoward52236 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Naw, we still have to hand the entire design to China and tell them, “just don’t trigger this bit in the silicon, it will disable the check. DON’T DO IT!”

Re:Attempting to prevent China…

By ceoyoyo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The same cold war ideas as ever.

1. Find or make a boogey man enemy to scare the population
2. Profit

The Rust Ecosystem Gets an AI Security Engineer in Residence

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
While the Rust Foundation has a Security Initiative to protect its ecosystem, “the threats have expanded,” they announced this week, “and so has the kind of help maintainers need.”
Much of this comes back to a single shift: Automated tooling (much of it now built on large language models) has gotten good enough to surface real vulnerabilities in open source code quickly and at scale. That is useful, and several large Rust projects have already received and fixed credible issues found this way. The same tooling has also made it trivial to generate vulnerability reports that look plausible and are worthless. Maintainers across the ecosystem are losing real hours sorting these from the reports that matter, and the noise tends to bury the signal.

So, with funding from the Alpha-Omega Project, the Rust Foundation is bringing on a full-time AI Security Engineer in Residence dedicated to the Rust ecosystem. This position is being funded with part of the $12.5M in open source security funding that the Linux Foundation announced in March. The role exists to take pressure off maintainers. The person in this position will use a mix of human-led and AI-assisted methods to proactively review Rust itself and the crates the ecosystem leans on most and help us separate real, exploitable issues from false positives and low-signal noise before anything reaches a maintainer…

This role will run full-time for six months to start, with room to extend depending on what we learn and the funding available. Methods, playbooks, and prompts will be documented so the work doesn’t end with the contract. We are grateful that Rust is not embarking on this work in isolation. Several other ecosystems have received parallel Alpha-Omega grants for the same kind of work (e.g., the PHP Foundation and the Drupal Association) and we plan to share tooling, triage practices, and what we learn rather than duplicating work
A statement from Rust’s new AI Security Engineer in Residence acknowledges that “One of our next challenges is the wave of bugs discovered by the next generation of AI-powered developer tools.”

Is this how Rust security works?

By quonset • Score: 3 Thread

Just curious if this is how Rust does security. Can anyone confirm?

Canonical’s Upcoming AI Tool: Talk to Ubuntu Instead of Typing

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
This week the Ubuntu desktop’s director of engineering announced they’re bringing speech-to-text dictation to Ubuntu Desktop, aiming for an experience “that feels like a natural part of the desktop while respecting user privacy and running entirely on local hardware.”

“Speech recognition has become a common feature on modern platforms, and we think it should be a first-class experience on Ubuntu Desktop as well.”

More details from the blog It’s FOSS:
For Ubuntu 26.10, the initial version of Myna is expected to be a desktop dictation tool built around GNOME on Wayland with a push-to-talk mechanism gatekeeping when your microphone accepts input. Using it means holding a hotkey, speaking, and letting go. A small activity indicator shows while it is listening, and the transcribed text lands wherever the cursor was sitting when dictation started.

Recognition itself happens inside a sandboxed component called the Canonical Inference Snap, while a Speech Orchestrator manages the session and an Audio Adapter handles whatever the microphone picks up, denoising and chunking it before it ever reaches the model… Speech recognition will happen locally, and an internet connection is not needed once the appropriate model is installed… The audio data won’t be sticking around either, being stored in a small in-memory buffer that gets discarded the moment the session ends. Features like dictation into password fields, wake words, continuous listening, voice assistants, voice commands, translation, speaker identification, and automatic language detection are all off the table…

You should also know that Canonical is looking for feedback before the specs for Myna are finalized, especially from people who already rely on dictation or assistive tools on Linux.

This Is Why I Ditched Ubuntu

By crunchy_one • Score: 3 Thread
This is another clear example of Ubuntu reaching for a feature no one asked for while ignoring the core product. Snaps were the last straw for me, but if it weren’t, then Myna certainly would be.

Perfect for corporate use

By dskoll • Score: 4 Thread

This feature is great in an office that uses small cubicles. Even better for open-plan offices!

But seriously, apart from disabled users who might not be able to use a keyboard, I don’t see a use case for this. The reason we use dictation on mobile devices is that they typically have poor keyboards. If you have a good keyboard, you can be far more efficient with it than with voice input.

Relevent

By markdavis • Score: 3 Thread

I use Linux on everything. So how relevant is Canonical’s announcement for me?

1) I don’t use Gnome
2) I don’t use Wayland
3) I don’t use SNAP
4) I don’t use Ubuntu
5) I have no use for desktop dictation since I can type much faster than speaking something, then reading it all again to edit and correct all the mistakes and add all the missing punctuation/etc.

At least they kept it “local” and perhaps some people might find the tool useful. So wake us up when it is a real/native package, can be used on any Linux, on any DE, on any GUI.

okay… where?

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

You should also know that Canonical is looking for feedback before the specs for Myna are finalized, especially from people who already rely on dictation or assistive tools on Linux.

OK, how do we provide this feedback? The article is chock-full of links, but not one for that. It gives strong “get fucked” energy.

Since it’s not worth putting out the effort to figure out where to submit some comments they definitely won’t give a fuck about anyway: In no way is it a “first class” anything when it’s only for GNOME and only in a snap. Let us know when it’s ready for prime time so we can test it out and decide if we care. There’s a 0% chance I’m going to use GNOME or snap.

Hooray!

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I’m all for a speech to text feature. I’ve wanted one for years. But, it has to not suck. The speech recognition in my car is dog shit. The speech recognition in Windows is dog shit. The speech recognition in Google has, after decades, reach a point where it is good. But, not great.

If Ubuntu can put it into the desktop, make it good, and not require 64GB of DDR5(with a street value of a squillion dollars) I’ll be happy to see it.

New Super PAC Aims to Rally Tech Workers to Help Limit AI: ‘the Guardrails Alliance’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
“A grassroots movement is forming among everyday tech workers who are demanding their companies develop and deploy AI responsibly,” reports TechCrunch.

Hoping to leverage that discontent is a new super PAC called the Guardrails Alliance. The New York Times reports that it launched Thursday with backers that included tech employees and labor unions:
Guardrails positions itself as a populist political movement that runs on small donations from people in the trenches of the AI boom. The PAC has about $5 million at its disposal today and planGuardrails will buy ads to support Alex Bores, a New York congressional candidate who became Leading the Future’s first target and is running in the primaries next week. s to raise $15 million this cycle — small potatoes compared to deep-pocketed adversaries like Leading the Future, which has more than $100 million from tech leaders like OpenAI president Greg Brockman…

“This is not about matching [Leading the Future] dollar for dollar,” [said the super PAC’s co-founder, political operative Shaunna Thomas]. “What this vehicle is meant to do is be a political home for people who are concerned about the way the anti-regulation AI tech sector is trying to manipulate elections.”
Meanwhile a former Netflix and Warner Bros. executive has launched the Alliance for Responsible Innovation in the Arts & Media, reports Variety, calling it an AI-focused content coalition that says it’s dedicated to supporting “responsible and sustainable AI innovation and the importance of human creativity.”
The initial members of the coalition, announced Monday, include Disney, the New York Times, Adobe, Condé Nast, the Financial Times, ITV, Advance, BBC, Cambridge University Press & Assessment, U.K. publisher Reach and Wiley. Many of the coalition’s members have either struck deals with AI companies or are developing their own AI tools… The group plans to argue for legal and policy guardrails around AI’s usage, with its funding directed towards analyses, tools and services focused on advancing those initiatives…

One of the group’s launch advisers is Damian Collins, OBE, who previously served as the U.K. Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology under prime ministers Boris Johnson and Liz Truss. “Using AI to break the law can never be an acceptable excuse,” he said in a statement. “Laws around personal safety, intellectual property and financial crime still apply in the age of AI. This is why ARIAM has been created and why I’m proud to working with this necessary initiative.”

sorry, uhhh

By snowshovelboy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Can someone tell me what “grassroots” means? Just because grassroots funding is one way you try to get money, does that make your whole thing “grassroots”? I just googled the founders and I guess it says right in the summary, they are not an everyday tech worker. They are political operatives. I thought grassroots meant it was organized by the people in the trenches, so in this case, that would mean it was organized by everyday tech workers. If they are going to gaslight me about the group’s origins, I have to wonder what else they are gaslighting me about. Maybe its not their fault, maybe TechCrunch is bad.... Either way, this sounds like astroturf to me. I’d be curious where they got $5 million dollars already, and how much of that goes to PAC administrative costs.