Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. WP Engine Says Automattic Planned To Shake Down 10 Hosting Companies For WordPress Royalties
  2. Anthropic Raises $30 Billion at $380 Billion Valuation, Eyes IPO This Year
  3. Palo Alto Chose Not To Tie China To Hacking Campaign For Fear of Retaliation From Beijing
  4. Microsoft Plans Smartphone-Style Permission Prompts for Windows 11 Apps
  5. Border Officials Are Said To Have Caused El Paso Closure by Firing Anti-Drone Laser
  6. Amazon Engineers Want Claude Code, but the Company Keeps Pushing Its Own Tool
  7. The “Are You Sure?” Problem: Why Your AI Keeps Changing Its Mind
  8. Anthropic To Cover Costs of Electricity Price Increases From Its Data Centers
  9. Meta Auditor EY Raised Red Flag on Data-Center Accounting
  10. US Hacking Tool Boss Stole and Sold Exploits To Russian Broker That Could Target Millions of Devices, DOJ Says
  11. Siri’s AI Overhaul Delayed Again
  12. Anthropic Safety Researcher Quits, Warning ‘World is in Peril’
  13. With Ring, American Consumers Built a Surveillance Dragnet
  14. Is Linux Mint Burning Out? Developers Consider Longer Release Cycle
  15. A Hellish ‘Hothouse Earth’ Getting Closer, Scientists Say

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

WP Engine Says Automattic Planned To Shake Down 10 Hosting Companies For WordPress Royalties

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
WP Engine’s third amended complaint against Automattic and WordPress co-founder Matt Mullenweg alleges that Mullenweg had plans to impose royalty fees on 10 hosting companies beyond WP Engine for their use of the WordPress trademark.

The amended filing, based on previously sealed information uncovered during discovery, also claims Mullenweg emailed a Stripe executive to pressure the payment processor into canceling WP Engine’s contract after WP Engine sued Automattic in October 2024. Newfold, the parent company of Bluehost and HostGator, is already paying Automattic for trademark use, according to the complaint, and Automattic is in conversations with other hosts.

The filing challenges the 8% royalty rate as arbitrary, citing Mullenweg’s comments at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024 where he said the figure was based on what WP Engine “could afford to pay.” Internal Automattic correspondence cited in the complaint includes Mullenweg describing his approach to WP Engine as “nuclear war” and warning that if the hosting company didn’t comply, he would start stealing its customers.

Anthropic Raises $30 Billion at $380 Billion Valuation, Eyes IPO This Year

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Anthropic has raised $30 billion in a Series G funding round that values the Claude maker at $380 billion as the company prepares for an initial public offering that could come as early as this year. Investors in the new round include Singapore sovereign fund GIC, Coatue, D.E. Shaw Ventures, ICONIQ, MGX, Sequoia Capital, Founders Fund, Greenoaks and Temasek. Anthropic raised its funding target by $10 billion during the process after the round was several times subscribed.

The San Francisco-based company, founded in 2021 by former OpenAI researchers, now has a $14 billion revenue run rate, about 80% of which comes from enterprise customers. It claims more than 500 customers spending over $1 million a year on its workplace tools. The round includes a portion of the $15 billion commitment from Microsoft and Nvidia announced late last year.

Recent good competition to Claude for coding

By caseih • Score: 3 Thread

Last week I praised Claude code, especially the cli here on slashdot. I still think it’s currently the best but it’s also the most expensive. But the competition is getting a lot better (and cheaper). I’ve been using the opencode cli lately with several models: Kimi K2.5, Kimi K2.5 Thinking, OpenCode’s Big Pickle, and Qwen3 Coder Next. Using them through OpenCode’s Zen service and also OpenRouter (for Qwen3 Coder Next), they are all about 1/2 the cost of Claude’s models, maybe less.

Of those I feel that Kimi K2.5 Thinking is probably the closest to Claude Opus 4.6. The rest are quite good at most things, and Qwen3 Coder Next is very fast. Qwen3 Coder Next also has the potential to run on “reasonable” local hardware.

Palo Alto Chose Not To Tie China To Hacking Campaign For Fear of Retaliation From Beijing

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
Palo Alto Networks opted not to tie China to a global cyberespionage campaign the firm exposed last week over concerns that the cybersecurity company or its clients could face retaliation from Beijing, according to two people familiar with the matter. The sources said that Palo Alto’s findings that China was tied to the sprawling hacking spree were dialed back following last month’s news, first reported by Reuters, that Palo Alto was one of about 15 U.S. and Israeli cybersecurity companies whose software had been banned by Chinese authorities on national security grounds.

A draft version of the report by Palo Alto’s Unit 42, the company’s threat intelligence arm, said that the prolific hackers — dubbed “TGR-STA-1030” in a report published on Thursday of last week — were connected to Beijing, the two people said. The finished report instead described the hacking group more vaguely as a “state-aligned group that operates out of Asia.” Attributing sophisticated hacks is notoriously difficult and debates over how best to assign blame for digital intrusions are common among cybersecurity researchers.

Cowards

By Coius • Score: 3 Thread

If you let them off to hook, it’ll only get worse.

Microsoft Plans Smartphone-Style Permission Prompts for Windows 11 Apps

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is planning to bring smartphone-style app permission prompts to Windows 11, requiring apps to get explicit user consent before they can access sensitive resources like the file system, camera and microphone. The company’s Windows Platform engineer Logan Iyer said the move was prompted by applications increasingly overriding user settings, installing unwanted software, and modifying core Windows experiences without permission.

A separate initiative called Windows Baseline Security Mode will enforce runtime integrity safeguards by default, allowing only properly signed apps, services, and drivers to run. Both changes will roll out in phases as part of Microsoft’s Secure Future Initiative, which the company launched in November 2023 after a federal review board called its security culture “inadequate.”

Pot, Meet Kettle

By crunchy_one • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The company’s Windows Platform engineer Logan Iyer said the move was prompted by applications increasingly overriding user settings, installing unwanted software, and modifying core Windows experiences without permission.

Excuese me, but aren’t these behaviors already baked right into Windows 11?

Good idea but.....

By tbords • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Would this apply equally to all applications including Microsoft’s own? If not, this is yet another violation. Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Office, Outlook, etc. are all some of the largest perpetrators of this behavior. Windows itself is a large perpetrator of this same behavior and repeatedly ignores user choice.

Nope

By RitchCraft • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Nope, I would rather have an OS for a PC, not a smart phone. You’ve lost your way Microslop.

It will fail

By Schoenlepel • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Like all the other things Microsoft recently tried to implement; it’ll be implemented badly and will eventually be rolled back because it’s broken state.

Bring back

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

Abort, Retry, Fail?_

Bring it back Microsoft, that was super intuitive. Since this is the AI era, have Bob and Clippy ask it.

Border Officials Are Said To Have Caused El Paso Closure by Firing Anti-Drone Laser

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
The abrupt closure of El Paso’s airspace late Tuesday was precipitated when Customs and Border Protection officials deployed an anti-drone laser on loan from the Department of Defense without giving aviation officials enough time to assess the risks to commercial aircraft, according to multiple people briefed on the situation.

The episode led the Federal Aviation Administration to abruptly declare that the nearby airspace would be shut down for 10 days, an extraordinary pause that was quickly lifted Wednesday morning at the direction of the White House. Top administration officials quickly claimed that the closure was in response to a sudden incursion of drones from Mexican drug cartels that required a military response, with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy declaring in a social media post that “the threat has been neutralized.”

But that assertion was undercut by multiple people familiar with the situation, who said that the F.A.A.‘s extreme move came after immigration officials earlier this week used an anti-drone laser shared by the Pentagon without coordination with the F.A.A. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. C.B.P. officials thought they were firing on a cartel drone, the people said, but it turned out to be a party balloon. Defense Department officials were present during the incident, one person said.

Re:So …

By pak9rabid • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I’d rather the airspace be shut down for a few days than have a military laser accidentally hit a commercial jet. I’d prefer neither happen, of course.

This sort of thing is what happens…

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

When a leader’s #1 job requirement is being a sycophant and there is no #2.

This is just a continuation of the crap we keep seeing because the cabinet was populated with toadies and Congress is led by cowards. Trump chose an incompetent person to head DHS; who then installs incompetent (or even evil) people to head CPB, ICE, etc.; who then inevitably keep making bad decisions that the population has to live with (or die with, as we’ve also seen).

The good news is, because of this it’ll probably go very badly for Trump at the midterms.

The bad news is, the ongoing damage will take years-to-decades to repair - assuming it can be repaired at all.

Re:So …

By ceoyoyo • Score: 4, Informative Thread

If the border patrol can’t tell the difference between a drone and a balloon then it’s probably a wise move to make sure there are no planes around where they’re playing with their pew pew lasers.

Lasers are famous for doing things you don’t expect. Reflecting off a shiny mylar balloon and blinding pilots for example.

Re: So …

By Frank Burly • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
When your only tool is a laser, every problem looks like a large balloon.

Re:This sort of thing is what happens…

By Scutter • Score: 4, Informative Thread

The good news is, because of this it’ll probably go very badly for Trump at the midterms.

He’s already laying the groundwork to invalidate or take over control of the midterms to ensure that your vote only counts if it’s for his toadies.

Amazon Engineers Want Claude Code, but the Company Keeps Pushing Its Own Tool

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon engineers have been pushing back against internal policies that steer them toward Kiro, the company’s in-house AI coding assistant, and away from Anthropic’s Claude Code for production work, according to a Business Insider report based on internal messages. About 1,500 employees endorsed the formal adoption of Claude Code in one internal forum thread, and some pointed out the awkwardness of being asked to sell the tool through AWS’s Bedrock platform while not being permitted to use it themselves.

Kiro runs on Anthropic’s Claude models but uses Amazon’s own tooling, and the company says roughly 70% of its software engineers used it at least once in January. Amazon says there is no explicit ban on Claude Code but applies stricter requirements for production use.

Claude Code is pretty awesome

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

I’m a hardware guy with limited programming experience. I can read and understand C for the most part but when it comes to coding, I am not a neckbeard. Claude Code has enabled me to finish a veritable shit-ton of projects that I have designed and built hardware for but been unable to get the firmware/software side working. And, that’s just at home.

At work, I’m an engineering manager and I’ve been able streamline our design and coding processes immensely by training my engineers on using Claude code to do some heavy lifting for them. The result is that my green engineers fresh out of school are productive much faster, and more importantly, I can reduce org costs by having a lower headcount. By the end of this year I expect I’ll be able to reduce headcount by 25% in the engineering department, mostly in the senior staff as they are a) resistant to adoption of AI and b) expensive as hell for people who don’t want to grow in their roles and use new tools.

AI is the way of the future, whether we like it or not. The best course is to adopt it and let it make you better at your job, as it has for me. Those who refuse are going to whine and bitch and moan themselves into irrelevance by the end of this year.

Amazon’s tooling

By ZipNada • Score: 3 Thread

“Kiro runs on Anthropic’s Claude models but uses Amazon’s own tooling”

The models require a front end that feeds them user queries, gives r/w access to local files, etc. and most people will want it to work from within the IDE they normally use. For millions of developers that IDE is Visual Studio Code. There are several companies out there that have forked VS Code to make a custom version that integrates with multiple LLM models. Amazon Kiro is one of them, so for many people this will integrate right in with their work flow; https://kiro.dev/

You can choose from multiple Anthropic models with Kiro but not other brands such as Gemini, GPT, which means less flexibility for the developer. I will say that in my opinion the Claude models are the top performers.
https://kiro.dev/docs/cli/chat…

Here is someone’s comparison of Claude Code and Windsurf; https://aiforcode.io/tools/cla…

So I’m not sure what the big fuss is about. Claude Code is “Terminal-native CLI via npm. Native VS Code and JetBrains IDE extensions.” Possibly it gives you a larger context window than some other options? Other than that it appears to be much the same.

The “Are You Sure?” Problem: Why Your AI Keeps Changing Its Mind

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
The large language models that millions of people rely on for advice — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini — will change their answers nearly 60% of the time when a user simply pushes back by asking “are you sure?,” according to a study by Fanous et al. that tested GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro across math and medical domains.

The behavior, known in the research community as sycophancy, stems from how these models are trained: reinforcement learning from human feedback, or RLHF, rewards responses that human evaluators prefer, and humans consistently rate agreeable answers higher than accurate ones. Anthropic published foundational research on this dynamic in 2023. The problem reached a visible breaking point in April 2025 when OpenAI had to roll back a GPT-4o update after users reported the model had become so excessively flattering it was unusable. Research on multi-turn conversations has found that extended interactions amplify sycophantic behavior further — the longer a user talks to a model, the more it mirrors their perspective.

Fucking morons

By reanjr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why does it prefer agreeable text to facts?

BECAUSE LLMS DON’T KNOW FACTS, you fucking twit.

No

By drinkypoo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The behavior, known in the research community as sycophancy, stems from how these models are trained: reinforcement learning from human feedback, or RLHF, rewards responses that human evaluators prefer, and humans consistently rate agreeable answers higher than accurate ones.

No, it’s because in the training corpus most of the responses to “are you sure” that anyone bothered to record will involve someone being corrected.

Re:Fucking morons

By sinij • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Are you sure?

Attention Blocks

By SumDog • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Your prompt is broken apart into tokens, the system prompt tells the LLM to be a helpful assistant and your prompt is append to it and then it predicts the next likely token response based on the weighted model of the entire embedding space. When you ask “are you sure?” it’s going to break that apart into tokens, add it to the context window and use the same attention algorithm to adjust all the weights for the next predictive response.

Those simple tokens can propagate big changes to to matrices that hold the current context.

These machines aren’t magical. They don’t reason. They’re not oracles. They can’t get things “wrong” or “right” because they have no intent and no concept of those things. They’re generating text on a deterministic model, and adding some randomness by not always picking the most likely next token (sometimes picking the 96% vs 98% likely next token). Most people just don’t understand how this stuff works and use terms like “hallucinating” because no one is being honest about what the weighted random guessing machines do.

Doesn’t help with uncommon subjects

By madbrain • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Try asking it something you know the answer to, on some rare topic.

For instance, I recently tuned my 189 string harpsichord - a painful process. For fun, I asked several AIs for a list of the most sifficult instruments to tune. It didn’t even make the list, even after this famous prompt. It took a while for it to finally appear in its responses. This is likely because a very small number of people play the harpsichord nowadays.

Similarly, I tied to vibe code some security code using NSS in Python. This was with Code rhapsodyx using Claude underneath. It kept switching to OpenSSL and rewriting the code countless times after running into a snag with the code it generated. Probably did so at least 50 times. This is because the vast majority of the code it was trained on uses OpenSSL. I had to fight its training. It was extremely painful. The problem it ran into was trivial - failing to call an initialization function. But it kept repeating its mistake, over and over. I eventually got what I want out of it. I could not have written the project without the AI, as I was dealing with a programing language i can only read, but not write.

Anthropic To Cover Costs of Electricity Price Increases From Its Data Centers

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
AI startup Anthropic says it will ensure consumer electricity costs remain steady as it expands its data center footprint. From a report:
Anthropic said it would work with utility companies to “estimate and cover” consumer electricity price increases in places where it is not able to sufficiently generate new power and pay for 100% of the infrastructure upgrades required to connect its data centers to the electrical grid.

In a statement to NBC News, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said: “building AI responsibly can’t stop at the technology — it has to extend to the infrastructure behind it. We’ve been clear that the U.S. needs to build AI infrastructure at scale to stay competitive, but the costs of powering our models should fall on Anthropic, not everyday Americans. We look forward to working with communities, local governments, and the Administration to get this right.”

O fuck off

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This shouldn’t be a marketing move this should be the default!

Re:O fuck off

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This shouldn’t be a marketing move this should be the default!

Uh, the marketing move is to make you believe this is true.

The default is to make you pay for it anyway. Because they can.

The standard, should be to prove AI is worth the effort. Against the very entity it’s destroying. So far, the answer is a resounding NO.

Re: O fuck off

By liqu1d • Score: 3 Thread
“We want to take your job and make you pay for us to do it” “o don’t worry we’re paying now” - erm thanks?

They say it now but…

By Inglix the Mad • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
I’ll believe that the moment the money is in escrow, untouchable by them, unless the service upgrades are canceled before they are started. After all there’s a dozen different ways to pass the buck on costs.

I wonder how much free money are they getting from various governments for the projects?

Wealthy people NEVER use their own money. In America it’s socialism for the wealthy and rugged individualism for the poor. Wait, why are they pulling that ladder up?

Re:O fuck off

By ForkInMe • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
While I agree it is a marketing move, the first thing I thought of was it was another jab at OpenAI in an attempt to make it harder for them to become profitable.

Meta Auditor EY Raised Red Flag on Data-Center Accounting

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Meta Platforms’ latest annual report contained an unusual, cautionary note for investors. From a report:
The tech giant’s auditor, Ernst & Young, raised a red flag over the financial engineering Meta used to keep a $27 billion data-center project off its balance sheet. While EY ultimately blessed Meta’s accounting treatment, the firm flagged it as a “critical audit matter.” This means it was one of the hardest, riskiest judgments the auditor had to make.

Such a warning label is rare for a specific, high-profile transaction at a major audit client. Meta moved the data-center project, called Hyperion, off its books in October into a new joint venture with Blue Owl Capital. Meta owns 20% of the venture; funds managed by Blue Owl own the other 80%. A holding company called Beignet Investor, which owns the Blue Owl portion, sold a then-record $27.3 billion of bonds to investors. The joint venture is known in accounting parlance as a variable interest entity, or VIE. Meta said it isn’t the “primary beneficiary” of this entity and so didn’t have to put the venture’s assets and liabilities on its own balance sheet.

Meta’s assertion that it lacks power over the venture is debatable and has drawn scrutiny from investors and lawmakers. Meta is a hyperscaler and knows how to run data centers for artificial intelligence, while Blue Owl is a financier. Whether the venture succeeds economically will come down to Meta’s decisions and know-how. In its report, EY said auditing Meta’s decision “was especially challenging due to the significant judgment required in determining the activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance.”

The AI-funding Jenga

By greytree • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
It can’t be long now until this very tall, very wobbly tower finally comes crashing down.

Translation

By NotEmmanuelGoldstein • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… off its books …

Our client is acting like a criminal but if we say that, we lose a customer. Worse, they bribe politicians to legitimize their dishonesty: Dammed if we do, Dammed if we don’t.

Here’s a non paywalled article instead

By leonbev • Score: 4, Informative Thread

https://seekingalpha.com/news/…

On the surface, this feels fishy.

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Informative Thread

From the eye-in-the-sky view of this, it looks like Meta knows there’s a pretty big risk of either low or no return on investment with this new datacenter. They want it built, but they don’t know that the whole purpose for it won’t blow-up or disappear in the time it takes to be built. Therefore, they want a holding company to own the majority share of the datacenter, so if it ends up being a financial blunder, they only take 20% of the blame, rather than 100%. It looks from here like a typical corporate structure shell game: hiding assets within “other companies” that are actually outright controlled by the parent, but on paper look like separate entities is a game as old as the concept of corporations itself. Sucks that even an auditor is too scared of the financial giant to say outright that it’s bullshit both legally and ethically.

Re:Here’s a non paywalled article instead

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

which is probably reasonable for a hyper-scaler deployment a company like Meta would consider. Most of the hardware is pretty reliable. Everything running on it will be highly fault tolerant. If anything goes wrong nobody local does any actual fix, they pull replacement unit out of stock, swap it, and it boots from SAN and rejoins the hive..

The failed unit is either shipped to some central recovery facility or maybe directly the recycler.

This is what state and local pols NEED to understand about these data center projects, once the construction phase is over they don’t mean that many jobs even in the context of a rural county. So they need to be really really careful about any tax abatement schemes etc. You are not going to see a bunch of new housing demand, new economic activity, payroll taxes etc. Just existing residents angry about noise, and their wells drying up.

COLLECT THE PROPERTY TAXES or deny the permits.

US Hacking Tool Boss Stole and Sold Exploits To Russian Broker That Could Target Millions of Devices, DOJ Says

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Federal prosecutors have revealed that Peter Williams, the former general manager of U.S. defense contractor L3Harris’s hacking tools division Trenchant, sold eight stolen software exploits to a Russian broker whose customers — including the Russian government — could have used them to access “millions of computers and devices around the world.”

Williams, a 39-year-old Australian national, pleaded guilty in October and admitted to earning more than $1.3 million in cryptocurrency from the sales between 2022 and 2025. In a sentencing memorandum filed Tuesday ahead of his anticipated February 24 sentencing in a Washington, D.C., federal court, the Justice Department asked the judge for nine years in prison, $35 million in restitution, and a maximum fine of $250,000.

Prosecutors described the unnamed Russian buyer — believed to be Operation Zero, which publicly claims to sell only to the Russian government — as “one of the world’s most nefarious exploit brokers.” Williams chose it because, by his own admission, “he knew they paid the most.” He also oversaw the wrongful firing of a subordinate who was blamed for the theft.

Better hope he saved enough…

By abulafia • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
to buy a pardon.

Dude seems like a real shitbag.

Re:Better hope he saved enough…

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Informative Thread
When the president leads the way, others follow....

Re: What a headline

By OrangeTide • Score: 4, Informative Thread

(US Hacking Tool [company]) Boss (Stole and Sold) Exploits To (Russian Broker) That Could Target Millions of Devices. [According to DOJ]

Re: Better hope he saved enough…

By OrangeTide • Score: 4, Informative Thread

He won’t get a Trump pardon that cheap unless he was a pedo

Can we all point to this…

By YuppieScum • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…the next time any Government spokesperson tells us that back-doors to cryptography are perfectly safe as only law-enforcement will have them?

Siri’s AI Overhaul Delayed Again

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Apple’s long-promised overhaul of Siri has hit fresh problems during internal testing, forcing the company to push several key features out of the iOS 26.4 update that was slated for March and spread them across later releases, Bloomberg is reporting.

The new Siri — first announced at WWDC in June 2024 and originally due by early 2025 — struggles to reliably process queries, takes too long to respond and sometimes falls back on OpenAI’s ChatGPT instead of Apple’s own technology, the report said. Apple has instructed engineers to begin testing new Siri capabilities on iOS 26.5 instead, due in May, and internal builds of that update include a settings toggle labeled “preview” for the personal data features. A more ambitious chatbot-style Siri code-named Campo, powered by Google servers and a custom Gemini model, is in development for iOS 27 in September.

Still time for an iPhone

By timeOday • Score: 3 Thread
About the time you start asking ChatGPT how to find and change a setting in your phone instead of hunting through endless menus, you realize that AI will totally change mobile. But I don’t think anybody has come close yet. Apple could still be the first to have a truly working AI assistant that does most of what you would expect and eliminates a lot of the tedium of menus and swipes and tap-and-holds and gestures.

Re:Still no time for an iPhone

By 2TecTom • Score: 4 Thread

one cannot expect our incompetent upper class overlords to produce anything but even more overpriced and unimaginative technology, let’s not forget the goal is not to produce good tech but to extract the most revenue in order to increase shareholder value

our devices and our services are designed to exploit us, manipulate us and surveil us, welcome to our classist corporatocracy

Please delay the new features…

By antdude • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

… just focus on fixing the issues like bugs. Way too many problems. V26 is awful. Also, please stop doing new major versions every year. Why not slow down and take the time?

Re:Still time for an iPhone

By Viol8 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If phone interfaces (And windows 11) were designed by professional interface designers instead of as an afterthought by programmers then we wouldn’t have to search to find functionality, it would be obvious where it is.

Apple’s AI mistake

By MobyDisk • Score: 3 Thread

Apple’s mistake was building *privacy* into their AI model. Nobody else did that, and it crippled Apple’s solution. Apple pushed 5GB of AI model data to everyone’s phone, and everyone complained about the space usage. Next up their AI is slow because it is using resources on the phone instead of big data centers. Apple did what everyone asked for, but users were ultimately unwilling to accept the compromise.

Personally, I liked the Apple solution better. On Android, if I lose internet for 2 seconds, and say to my phone “Call Bob Smith” it sits there for several minutes then times out with “try again later”. BUT IT GETS WORSE: The local hardware transcribed the text perfectly. So there was no need for a server to be involved at all!

Apple’s old approach was the right one, so it is really sad that they botched it.

Anthropic Safety Researcher Quits, Warning ‘World is in Peril’

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shares a report:
An Anthropic safety researcher quit, saying the “world is in peril” in part over AI advances. Mrinank Sharma said the safety team “constantly [faces] pressures to set aside what matters most,” citing concerns about bioterrorism and other risks.

Anthropic was founded with the explicit goal of creating safe AI; its CEO Dario Amodei said at Davos that AI progress is going too fast and called for regulation to force industry leaders to slow down. Other AI safety researchers have left leading firms, citing concerns about catastrophic risks.

We have lost our ability to debate and decide

By hadleyburg • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I don’t have a good idea as to what has caused it, but look at any TV debate up to sometime around the 1980s and you are likely to find a logical discussion, with little tolerance for lies, exaggeration, or logical error. That seems to have gone now.

Scientists might show that we are in trouble, and the result is that the most powerful deride the scientists, and most voters are incapable of the thought required to arrive at an informed opinion.

Politics and social debate need to fundamentally change.

Re:Science: the god that failed

By snowshovelboy • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s pretty much a trope that coffee has been bad for us one week and then good for us again the next week, ad infinitum.

Scientists are not the ones telling you this. The people telling you this are the same ones that inject themselves into every conversation and try to convince you to buy things you don’t need.

Surely

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
The best place to prevent these concerns from happening is from the inside? Cynic in me thinks these safety people are hired to “quit” at opportune times with a fat exit package just when AI needs another marketing hype about how it’s so powerful it’ll change the world.

Re:Science: the god that failed

By null etc. • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It’s pretty much a trope that coffee has been bad for us one week and then good for us again the next week, ad infinitum.

It would be very amusing to see the world through your eyes.

How exactly do you think science works? Do you think that someone asks a question, and then scientists all get together in a single meeting to answer that question, and then they post the answer and claim it is the full and unquestionable truth?

No, that would be ridiculous. Instead, science is performed by millions of individual scientists, who each seek to understand some particular aspect of reality just a little bit better. They perform discovery, form a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, and then publish their results for the world to review.

There is no illuminati-style organization that coordinates all of the scientists, and their findings, together. Thus, one thousand different studies about various effects of coffee upon human health might be performed, and they might all study slightly different aspects of the topic, or test things in different ways. This in no way implies that the scientific method is flawed, or that “scientists” are just a bunch of goofy mind-changers who can never quite figure out which way is up when it comes to figuring out what science actually means.

This is to be expected for something as complex as science, unless you have an extraordinarily simple mind.

Re:Science: the god that failed

By pipegeek • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The predictions of science led to every single thing about whatever device you’re typing this drivel on. They led to the microwave you nuked your dinner in and likely to most of the food you put in there. They also led to whatever lifesaving treatments have kept you from dying from any of the numerous ailments that left most families with at least one dead child until very recently. They’re why you don’t have smallpox and never will.

Absent the predictions of science, you live in a hut farming the same land your great grandfather did for the same wealthy landowner. Just exactly how did the predictions of science “not live up to the hype”?

With Ring, American Consumers Built a Surveillance Dragnet

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
Ring’s Super Bowl ad on Sunday promoted “Search Party,” a feature that lets a user post a photo of a missing dog in the Ring app and triggers outdoor Ring cameras across the neighborhood to use AI to scan for a match. 404 Media argues the cheerful premise obscures what the Amazon-owned company has become: a massive, consumer-deployed surveillance network.

Ring founder Jamie Siminoff, who left in 2023 and returned last year, has since moved to re-establish police partnerships and push more AI into Ring cameras. The company has also partnered with Flock, a surveillance firm used by thousands of police departments, and launched a beta feature called “Familiar Faces” that identifies known people at your door. Chris Gilliard, author of the upcoming book Luxury Surveillance, called the ad “a clumsy attempt by Ring to put a cuddly face on a rather dystopian reality: widespread networked surveillance by a company that has cozy relationships with law enforcement.”

Further reading: No One, Including Our Furry Friends, Will Be Safer in Ring’s Surveillance Nightmare, EFF Says

Like most dangerous things, it’s the misuse…

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I have a ring doorbell and cameras and they’re game changers. IDK why you wouldn’t want the police to have access. Are you going to self-investigate crimes?

…our concern is not when it’s used correctly, but when it’s misused....just like guns, drugs, motor-vehicles....when used responsibly?…fine…when a repeat offender drunk driver crashes in your car, a huge issue. Like guns and vehicles we need regulations.

Perhaps make it a crime to show footage from another person’s property unless there is a warrant or reasonable suspicion of a crime committed?. So yeah, you catch someone stealing your neighbor’s packages (I live in the city, so our front doors are less than 50 feet apart), you’re a hero. You use it to show your neighbor her husband had a visitor when she’s not in town?…you’re human trash and should be charged with a misdemeanor and banned from using surveillance cameras in public for a year.

Re: “Search Party Deported Another Neighbor!”

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Back in the real world, cops have been asking for privately owned surveillance recordings to help with investigations since video recording became a thing. And the very reason people (usually businesses) have set up video surveillance was to deter crime and help track down crooks who were insufficiently deterred.

And they are welcome to continue to ask (I’ve actually given them video a couple of times), or they could even get a warrant, all without me becoming an involuntary instrument of questionable state surveillance. It actually works pretty well as it is IMO.

Re:A woman down the street got caught cheating by

By lucifuge31337 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I don’t give a shit about the cops knowing things about me. I don’t commit crimes.

This is literally the kind of thinking that got us here, to the point of surveilance capitalism. Because credulous people like you thing that wanting privacy means someone is doing something nefarious. How’s that worked out?

Re:“Search Party Deported Another Neighbor!”

By leonbev • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’m sure that somewhere buried in the terms and conditions is a statement that allows Amazon AI to analyze your video footage for products that they can monetize.

That way, the next time you log into amazon.com, they can recommend winter floor mats for the 2018 Toyota RAV-4 they see in your driveway and flea and tick medication for the golden retriever that you take for walks every afternoon.

Oh, and if those flowers are looking a bit wilted come spring, maybe they should recommend some fertilizer as well.

Re:UniFi

By SirSlud • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Dude, the discussion is about a commodity product millions of people are buying and using that requires next to zero technical aptitude.

There’s always a few adorable lunkheads who chime on these discussions about how responsible and well reasoned their decisions are, but for whatever reason they’re unable to spot why that is fully orthogonal to the expressed concern. Unless you actually believe there is some reality in which the solution to the expressed concern is simply that if you just chime in enough, everyone is gunna just switch over to what they’re doing?

Like in this case the problem of 10 million Ring Doorbell owners is that 10 million Ring Doorbell owners are just find out about UniFi, buy a NAS, and replace their doorbells with Ubiquiti doorbells or cameras? (At like, generously speaking, 10 times the cost. Have fun running that PoE, grandma!)

Honestly, I’m curious why you think your UniFi/NAS setup is germane to this discussion.

Is Linux Mint Burning Out? Developers Consider Longer Release Cycle

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli writes:
The Linux Mint developers say they are considering adopting a longer development cycle, arguing that the project’s current six month cadence plus LMDE releases leaves too little room for deeper work. In a recent update, the team reflected on its incremental philosophy, independence from upstream decisions like Snap, and heavy investment in Cinnamon and XApp. While the release process “works very well” and delivers steady improvements, they admit it consumes significant time in testing, fixing, and shipping, potentially capping ambition.

Mint’s next release will be based on a new Ubuntu LTS, and the team says it is seriously interested in stretching the development window. The stated goal is to free up resources for more substantial development rather than constant release management. Whether this signals bigger technical changes or simply acknowledges bandwidth limits for a small team remains unclear, but it marks a notable rethink of one of desktop Linux’s most consistent release rhythms.

Linux Mint is in trouble

By Excelcia • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The community over at Linux Mint is showing the pressure. Under the gun, and unable to process even basic issues, they turn on users and blame them for problems and bugs they experience, telling them their use case is flawed when the reality is they just don’t have the resources to deal with the issue. Now, not having the resources is one thing, and a fair response. But turning it back on the user and telling them their use case is flawed when they experience is the tail wagging the dog.

Another community I saw this in for a long time, and I really thought the project would implode, was the Palemoon browser. They got behind when webcomponents became a thing and they could keep up with changes. They too would blame the user when yet another web site that didn’t work on the browser was encountered, telling them they should be using the site, should complain about the site, and why would they need a site like that anyway??

Palemoon dragged themselves out of it. They buckled down, and it’s almost back to being a useful browser again. But the community at Mint concerns me. They are on the down swing. User blaming and load shedding are just symptoms of a larger issue. Too much work for too few volunteers. They also don’t have a good end-to-end workflow strategy. By that I mean in many cases they don’t seem to treat the OS as a coherent whole that is used for actual workflows from beginning to end. Pieces that have no replacement are deprecated while resources are spent on pieces that have many duplicates.

I’m concerned.

Re:I approve

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

As someone who always waits for the “xx.3” versions (and often skips the even ones), I do too.

I’ve been using Linux since the 90s and when I was younger, I loved tweaking and getting the newest stuff. But these days I want it to “just work”(tm) and not have the UI and features not change a lot.

Yes. OS providers like Microsoft have forgotten the purpose of an operating system, They believe that the purpose of computing is the operating system, when in fact, it is supposed to allow us to run the programs we work with, then get the hell out of the way.

Maybe yearly feature releases for Mint.

Re:I hope not, it’s my favorite!

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Mint is the best out of the box experience for me, and just a hassle-free daily driver. The community is so nice, friendly, and helpful, it is the opposite of the stereotype of just answering “RTFM” and whatever criticisms people had about forums in the 90s. I hope it stays strong, I donate every time I do a new install or upgrade to a new version. In case it does languish, is there anything anyone would recommend that ticks all the same boxes for being a friendly end user desktop experience with a classic Windows 2000-like desktop that has support/compatibility with such a wide and fairly current and stable variety of packages (debian)?

I’m going to be teaching a class in Linux operations, and that RTFM issue morphed into a noob asking a question, then an experienced user answering “Oh, that’s easy!” then launching into a solution that leaves the noob more confused than before. Funny thing is, while canvassing for students, I got a lot of more experienced people who offer to teach.

And here’s where it gets odd. I have picked a person to assist with teaching. A woman who pretty much lives in Terminal. I do both GUI and terminal, and plan on learning from her as well. And part of the reason why I chose her is that she isn’t doing the typical guy thing. She’s an apt teacher. Most guys I know want to impress others with how much they know, more than teach others.

Re:I approve

By taustin • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yes. OS providers like Microsoft have forgotten the purpose of an operating system, They believe that the purpose of computing is the operating system,

Not really, Microsoft believes the purpose of an operating system is to a) generate income for Microsoft, and b) generate tons of personal data they can sell to advertisers and AI con artists.

Re:I approve

By gweihir • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

OS providers like Microsoft have forgotten the purpose of an operating system, They believe that the purpose of computing is the operating system, when in fact, it is supposed to allow us to run the programs we work with, then get the hell out of the way.

Indeed. The purpose of an OS is to make things possible and to bother you are little as possible. Same, incidentally, for Office programs. MS seems to instead optimize “engagement” with their OS and Office programs, i.e. they waste as much of your time as possible with far too deep menu structures, changing things around, minimal customization for users, low/no customization persistence, and other crap that makes their stuff a permanent load on your attention capacity.

Essentially, they are doing “attention economy” instead of “professional tool economy” and it is a massive problem now. The second indicator is that reliability and security are slowly getting worse and worse. They probably cannot fix that anymore and hence need to be replaced. In Europe, that process has started.

A Hellish ‘Hothouse Earth’ Getting Closer, Scientists Say

Posted by msmash View on SlashDot
The world is closer than thought to a “point of no return” after which runaway global heating cannot be stopped, scientists have said. From a report:
Continued global heating could trigger climate tipping points, leading to a cascade of further tipping points and feedback loops, they said. This would lock the world into a new and hellish “hothouse Earth” climate far worse than the 2-3C temperature rise the world is on track to reach.

The climate would also be very different to the benign conditions of the past 11,000 years, during which the whole of human civilisation developed. At just 1.3C of global heating in recent years, extreme weather is already taking lives and destroying livelihoods across the globe. At 3-4C, “the economy and society will cease to function as we know it,” scientists said last week, but a hothouse Earth would be even more fiery. The public and politicians were largely unaware of the risk of passing the point of no return, the researchers said.

The group said they were issuing their warning because while rapid and immediate cuts to fossil fuel burning were challenging, reversing course was likely to be impossible once on the path to a hothouse Earth, even if emissions were eventually slashed. It was difficult to predict when climate tipping points would be triggered, making precaution vital, said Dr Christopher Wolf, a scientist at Terrestrial Ecosystems Research Associates in the US. Wolf is a member of a study team that includes Prof Johan Rockstrom at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and Prof Hans Joachim Schellnhuber at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria.

Re:Again

By Truth_Quark • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Name one climate prediction over the last 40 years that came close to truth.

Here’s an analysis of how the major models have preformed, with respect to global mean surface temperature predictions.

The one from the early 80s was a bit conservative, but they’ve all been pretty close since then.

Perhaps you can link to a few of these papers you think got it wrong?

In 2006, former vice-president Al Gore projected that unless drastic measures were implemented, the planet would hit an irreversible “point of no return” by 2016. Game over.

We’ve past 350 ppm of CO2, which is the level that will come with the high-cost high casualty impacts of greater than 1.5C of warming. Currently we’re at 427 ppm.

So Gore hasn’t been shown to be wrong. Perhaps the problems is that you don’t understand that it takes decades for half the warming from an increase in CO2 to have occurred. Ice-albedo feedback in particular takes centuries.

Nor Pachuri.

James Hansen, drew a line in the sand testifying before Congress in June 2008, on the dangers of greenhouse gases: “We’re toast if we don’t get on a very different path. This is the last chance.”

Do you have any evidence that he was wrong? Or are you hoping, without basing that hope on any facts that you can point to?

Re:Time to address the real problem

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You do realize they’ll never “eat” those costs, right? They’ll pass them on to you the consumer and maintain their profits and bonuses. I dislike being that cynical, but the tariffs have shown us extra costs are passed on.

You are indeed being overly cynical. You’re right that they don’t want to eat those costs, but you’re missing that they also don’t want to lose market share (and therefore sales) to a competitor who is able to charge less because the competitor doesn’t incur those costs.

Which is to say, if there is an alternative way to provide the same (or similar) product cheaper by reducing/avoiding expensive CO2 emissions, they’ll switch to that, as a way to remain competitive. Which is the desired outcome.

Re:Real question

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Based on my own older family members who voted for Trump, I don’t believe they did so because they didn’t care, but because they were deceived.

The thing is, they wanted to be deceived — that gave them an out. Now they can go to their graves with a clear conscience, because they “know” global warming is a myth and therefore they didn’t really doom their grandchildren. That’s all they wanted, is some comforting lies that would give them permission to not worry about it.

Re:Got bad news for y’all

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Will it be this utter hell some are predicting? Probably not. But it will be toasty. An odd thing is some places will get colder.

If you consider only the climate itself, then it probably won’t be utter hell — large portions of the Earth will still be perfectly livable.

But at the same time — large, currently highly populated portions of the Earth will no longer be livable, and all of those dispossessed people are going to have to go somewhere else, and compete for the remaining resources of the places that remain livable… which means refugee flows, and famine, and xenophobia, and violence, and war. That’s where the utter hell is going to come from. Too many mouths chasing not enough grain.

Re:Again

By Truth_Quark • Score: 5, Informative Thread

We are 10 years past Al Gores, “Point of no return”. So, are you saying that you think that there is no longer any action we can take that would avoid a complete disaster?

Every kilogram of CO2 makes it worse. But the opportunity to keep the earth below 1.5 degrees of warming, passed about the time Gore was speaking of. 8 degrees of warming is worse than 7.5 degrees of warming.

Ice sheets are growing.

It blows me away that you can post in a thread with multiple links to how much the ice sheets are shedding mass, and claim that the Ice sheets are growing.

[B]etween 2002 and 2025, Antarctica shed approximately 135 gigatons of ice per year.

[B]etween 2002 and 2025, Greenland shed approximately 264 gigatons of ice per year.

As for Nor, you named him but typed nothing.

Nor Pachuri, as in neither Pachuri. As in “you haven’t provided evidence that he was wrong either”.

Because probably he was the head of the UN climate panel, supposedly an EXPERT, and he stated that the point of no return was 4 years earlier than Gore.

That’s not from his work. His background is engineering and economics. The IPCC is half a dozen people. The EXPERTS are the thousands of scientists who volunteer their time to the working groups.

But he’s wasn’t wrong either.

X year passes, same statements made, only change is now it is Y year!

Can you please link me to a couple or few instances of where the same statements have been published by a scientific body, but the year backdated?

Because a lot of the other stuff you’ve said here has been opposite to the facts, so I worry that you’re mistaken about this too.

Look at what they implement if you want to know why they yell. Massive, dirty lithium mines, and other heavy metal mining operations stripping the earth for electric car batteries.

Oh, good to see you’re concerned about the environment. Is it only the impact of lithium mines that concerns you, and those heavy metals that are used for batteries? Because Humanity uses many resources for many things.

A single 3 Megawatt (MW) wind turbine requires 335 tons of steel, 4.7 tons of copper, 3 tons of aluminum, 2 tons of rare earths and 1,200 tons of concrete.

Infrastructure takes resources. Roads. Coal Plants. Bridges. Wind Turbines. Wind turbines produce the cheapest electricity there is with no fuel costs, no fuel logistics, and without greenhouse emissions during operation. You’re welcome to be a luddite, but if you’re concerned about concrete, shouldn’t you start complaining about roads?

They cost more in energy, created mostly by fossil fuels to create than they will ever offset.

Nope.

The embodied energy in a wind turbine, that is, the energy used in its manufacture, transport, erection and operation is generally paid back within 6-12 months of operation.

Those massive composite blades last 20 -25 years and to this date they have no idea how to recycle any of the blade.

Carbon fibre and fibreglass aren’t easy to recycle, but:
1) Not impossible: Carbon Rivers Makes Wind Turbine Blade Recycling and Upcycling a Reality With Support From DOE
2) Represent nearly no part of the mass of the turbine 90% or so of which can be recycled

We are regulating heavily, subsidizing and diverting energy to, “Green Technologies” that kill the environment.

No mate. That’s fossil fuels