Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Bluesky’s Newest Product: an AI Tool That Gives You Custom Feeds
  2. Amazon Gambles on $4B Push Into America’s Rural Areas, May Soon Carry More Parcels Than USPS
  3. Apple Now Requires Device-Level Age Verification in the UK. Could the US Be Next?
  4. Jupiter’s Lightning May Have the Force of Nuclear Weapons
  5. What Made Bell Labs So Successful?
  6. Disney Ends $1B OpenAI Investment After Sora’s Surprise Closure. What’s Next?
  7. Do Emergency Microsoft, Oracle Patches Point to Wider Issues?
  8. MacOS 26.4 Adds Warnings For ClickFix Attacks to Its Terminal App
  9. SystemD Contributor Harassed Over Optional Age Verification Field, Suggests Installer-Level Disabling
  10. IBM Quantum Computer Simulates Real Magnetic Materials and Matches Lab Data
  11. Sony is Raising PlayStation 5 Prices Again, Between $100 and $150
  12. Thousands of Americans Treated With Psilocybin in 2025
  13. Linux Maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman Says AI Tools Now Useful, Finding Real Bugs
  14. NASA’s First Nuclear-Powered Interplanetary Spacecraft Will Send Helicopters to Mars in 2028
  15. ‘Ads Are Popping Up On the Fridge and It Isn’t Going Over Well’

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Bluesky’s Newest Product: an AI Tool That Gives You Custom Feeds

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“What happens when you can describe the social experience you want and have it built for you…?” asks Bluesky? “We’ve just started experimenting, but we’re sharing it now because we want you to build alongside us.”

Called “Attie” — because it’s built with Bluesky’s decentralized publishing framework, AT Protocol (which is open source) — the new assistant turns natural language prompts into social feeds, without users having to know how to code. (It’s part of Bluesky’s mission to “develop and drive large-scale adoption of technologies for open and decentralized public conversation.”)

Engadget reports:
On the Attie website, examples include prompts like, “Show me electronic music and experimental sound from people in my network” or “Builders working on agent infrastructure and open protocol design.”

“It feels more like having a conversation than configuring software,” [writes Bluesky’s former CEO/current chief innovation officer, Jay Graber, in a blog post]. “You describe the sort of posts you want to see, and the coding agent builds the feed you described.”

Graber added that Attie is a separate app from Bluesky and users don’t have to use the new AI assistant if they don’t want to. However, since Attie and Bluesky were built on the same framework, it could mean there will be some cross-app implementation between the two or any other app built on the AT Protocol.
“Attie is open for beta signups today, and we’ll be sharing what we learn along the way,” Graber writes in the blog post. “To learn more about Attie, visit: Attie.AI. Come help us find out what this can be.”

The blog post warns that “Right now, AI is undermining human agency at the same time it’s enhancing it,” since “The proliferation of low-quality AI-generated content is making public social networks noisier and less trustworthy…” And in a world where “signal is getting harder to find… The major platforms aren’t trying to fix this problem.”
They’re using AI to increase the time users spend on-platform, to harvest training data, and to shape what users see and believe through systems they can’t inspect and didn’t choose. We think AI should serve people, not platforms…

An open protocol puts this power directly in users’ hands. You can use it to build your own feeds, create software that works the way you want it to, and find signal in the noise. We built the AT Protocol so anyone could build any app they imagine on top of it, but until recently “anyone” really meant “anyone who can code.” Agentic coding tools change that. For the first time, an open protocol can be genuinely open to everyone…

The Atmosphere [Bluesky’s interoperable ecosystem] is an open data layer with a clearly defined schema for applications, which makes it uniquely well-suited for coding agents to build on… Bluesky will continue to evolve as a social app millions of people rely on. Attie will be where we experiment with agentic social.

AI is an accelerant on whatever it’s applied to. I want it to accelerate decentralizing social and putting power back in users’ hands. But I don’t think the most interesting things built on AT Protocol will come from us. They’re going to come from everyone who picks up these tools and starts building.

Amazon Gambles on $4B Push Into America’s Rural Areas, May Soon Carry More Parcels Than USPS

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In many rural areas, America’s online shoppers can wait half a week or more for deliveries. But Amazon started a $4 billion “rural delivery push” last year, reports Bloomberg, and has now cut delivery times to under 24 hours for 1 in 5 rural and small-town households, with 48-hour delivery to 62% of rural households.
The payoff could be huge. Rural shoppers in the US collectively spend $1 trillion a year on clothing, electronics, household goods and other items, representing about 20% of retail purchases excluding cars and gasoline, according to Morgan Stanley. Amazon aims to recondition those shoppers to expect quick delivery, which would play to its strengths and make the company top-of-mind for online purchases… “Rural America is often overlooked,” said Sky Canaves, an analyst at EMarketer Inc. who tracks online sales. “This is the opportunity Amazon is trying to seize because e-commerce growth is getting harder to come by....”

Amazon’s rural push will require a lot more rural business owners willing to make deliveries… Today, Amazon delivers more parcels overall than UPS and FedEx, which are both shedding workers and shrinking their delivery networks, including in rural areas. By picking up the slack, Amazon is expected to become the largest parcel carrier in the US — surpassing the postal service — in 2028, according to the shipping software company Pitney Bowes. Amazon currently delivers two of three orders itself. For rural shoppers, the most visible change will be fewer brown UPS trucks, fewer packages delivered by mail carriers and more small business owners pulling up in their minivans.
Amazon’s relationship with America’s postal service “has become rocky following a dispute over contract terms,” notes the Wall Street Journal. But they also share an interesting calculation by Marc Wulfraat, president of MWPVL International, a supply-chain consultancy monitoring the e-commerce company’s logistics network. . At Amazon’s current pace of constructing 40 to 50 new delivery hubs each year, he estimates Amazon will be able to ship packages to every single U.S. ZIP Code within four years.

Re:It pays off

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Yep. Hamstring the USPS so your rich buddies can privatize it.

Apple Now Requires Device-Level Age Verification in the UK. Could the US Be Next?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Apple unveiled new device-level age restrictions in the UK on Wednesday. “After downloading a new update, users will now have to confirm that they are 18 or older to access unrestricted features,” reports Gizmodo.

“Users will be able to confirm their age with a credit card or by scanning an ID.”
For those underage or who have not confirmed their age, Apple will turn on Web Content Filter and Communication Safety, which will not only restrict access to certain apps or websites, but will also monitor messages, shared photo albums, AirDrop, and FaceTime calls for nudity. Apple didn’t specify exactly which services and features are banned for under-18 users, but it will likely be in compliance with UK legislation…

The British government does not require Apple and other OS providers to institute device-level age checks, but it does restrict minor access to online pornography under the Online Safety Act, which passed in 2023. So far, that restriction has only been implemented at the website level, but UK officials have been worried about easy loopholes to evade the age restrictions, like VPNs.

The broader tech industry has been campaigning for some time to use device-level age checks instead in response to the rising tide of under-16 social media and internet bans around the world. Last month, in a landmark social media trial in California, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg also supported this idea, saying that conducting age verification “at the level of the phone is just a lot clearer than having every single app out there have to do this separately.” Pornhub-operator Aylo had advocated for device-level restrictions in the UK as well, and even sent out letters to Apple, Google, and Microsoft in November asking for OS-level age verification…

The most obvious question: Could this be brought stateside?

Will, not could, come to the USA

By dskoll • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

A large number of states, including California, Colorado, Illinois and New York, have already passed or are passing stupid device age-attestation laws like this one. These laws purport to apply to just about any OS on any general-purpose computing device, if the device is capable of downloading software. If the laws are not fought, it means open-source is in trouble and mass surveillance will become the norm.

ownership

By tiananmen tank man • Score: 3 Thread

you only have a license to use your iPhone, when you clicked agree.

Laws.

By msauve • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
Instead of laws, how about parents take responsibility for parenting?

The most obvious question

By MpVpRb • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Does it work?
Kids are smart and really good at finding workarounds
The likely outcome is political theater, where politicians claim success while kids get creative
The other likely outcome is annoyance and failure when the tech goes wrong

Jupiter’s Lightning May Have the Force of Nuclear Weapons

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
How powerful is Jupiter’s lightning? Thick clouds cover the view, notes Science magazine. But using an instrument on NASA’s Juno spacecraft (orbiting Jupiter for the past decade), researchers determined Jupiter’s lightning bolts are 100 to 10,000 times more energetic than earth’s:
A single bolt of lightning on Earth releases about 1 billion joules of energy. That means the most extreme bolts of jovian lightning carry 10 trillion joules of energy, equivalent to 2400 tons of TNT, or one-sixth the power of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan. Based on the rates of flashes seen by Juno, storms on this tempestuous world can unleash the force of multiple nuclear weapons every minute…

The four storms Juno studied were monstrous, says Michael Wong, a planetary scientist at the University of California, Berkeley and one of the study’s authors. There were three flashes per second on average, often emerging from the hearts of storms that are 3000 kilometers across, longer than the distance from New York City to Denver.
The researchers used the Hubble Space Telescope (and photographs from Juno’s camera) to track Jupiter’s storms with such precision that their radiometer could then pick out individual lightning flashes, according to the article.
“It’s just a massive ball of gas. It makes sense that there’s very energetic lightning happening,” says Daniel Mitchard, a lightning physicist at Cardiff University who wasn’t involved with the new study. But confirming such suspicions “is exciting,” he says, because lightning plays an important role in forging complex chemistry — including the sort that primordial life is built on.
Thanks to Slashdot reader sciencehabit for sharing the article.

What Made Bell Labs So Successful?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Bell Labs “created many of the foundational innovations of the modern age,” writes Jon Gertner, author of The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the Great Age of American Innovation — from transistors and telecommunications satellites to Unix and the C programming language.

But what was the secret to its success? he asks in a new article for the Wall Street Journal. Start with its lucky arrival in a “problem-rich” environment, suggests Arno Penzias, winner of one of Bell Labs’ 11 Nobel Prizes:
It was Bell Labs’ responsibility, in other words, to create technologies for designing, expanding and improving an unruly communications network of cables and microwave links and glass fibers. The Labs also had to figure out ways to create underwater conduits, as well as switching centers that could manage the growing number of customers and escalating amounts of data.... Money mattered, too. Being connected to AT&T, the largest company in the world, was an advantage. The Labs’ budget was enormous, and accounting conventions allowed its parent company to make huge and continuing investments in R & D. The generous funding, moreover, allowed scientists and engineers to buy and build expensive equipment — for instance, anechoic chambers to create the world’s quietest rooms…

The most fortunate part of Bell Labs’ situation, however, was that in being attached to a monopoly it could partake in long-term thinking… Without competition nipping at its heels, Bell Labs engineers had the luxury of working out difficult ideas over decades. The first conceptualization of a cellular phone network, for instance, came out of the Labs in the late 1940s; it wasn’t until the late 1970s that technicians began testing one in Chicago to gauge its potential. The challenge of deploying these technologies was immense. (The regulatory hurdles were formidable, too....)
The article also credits the visionary management of Mervin Kelly — who fortunately also “had access to funding in a decade when most executives and universities didn’t” to hire the brightest people. (By the early 1980s Bell Labs employed about 25,000 researchers, technicians and support staff, with an annual budget of $2 billion — roughly $7 billion in today’s dollars.) “The Labs’ involvement in World War II suggested to Kelly that an exciting postwar era of electronics was approaching, but that the technical problems would be so complex that they required a mix of expertise — not just physicists, but material scientists, chemists, electrical engineers, circuitry experts and the like.”
At Bell Labs, Kelly would sometimes handpick teams and create such a mix, as was the case for the transistor invention in the late 1940s. He came to see innovation arising not from like-minded or similarly trained people conversing with each other, but from a friction of ideas and approaches. It meant hiring researchers who had different personalities and favored a range of experimental angles. It also meant personally designing a campus in Murray Hill where departments were spread apart, so that scientists and engineers would be forced to walk, mingle and engage in serendipitous conversations and debate ideas. Meanwhile, under Kelly, the Labs focused on hiring people who were deeply curious, not just smart. Kelly saw it as his professional duty to do far more than what was expected, with his laboratory and vast resources, to create new technologies…

The breakup of AT&T’s monopoly, which led to a steady shrinking of Bell Labs’ staff, budget and remit, shows us that no matter how forward looking your employees and managers may be, they will not necessarily see the future coming. It likewise suggests that technological progress is too unpredictable for one organization, no matter how powerful or smart, to control. Famously, Bell Labs managers didn’t see value in the Arpanet, which eventually led to today’s internet.

And yet, for at least five decades, Bell Labs created a blueprint for the global development of communications and electronics. In understanding why it did so, I tend to think its ultimate secret may be hiding in plain sight. The secret has to do with Bell Labs’ structure — not only being connected to a fabulously profitable monopoly, but being connected to a company that could move theoretical and applied research into a huge manufacturing division that made telecom equipment (at Western Electric) and ultimately into a dynamic operating system (the AT&T network)… Scientists and engineers at the Labs understood their ideas would be implemented, if they passed muster, into the huge system its parent company was running.
Bell Labs racked up about 30,000 patents, according to the article, and celebrated its 100th anniversary last April.

It is now part of Finland-based Nokia.

Re:Is that because of the monopoly?

By Fons_de_spons • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I worked for a company that found its roots in the original RCA labs. The boss was a stubborn guy that navigated his own course. A lot of executives came to lecture him. He relied heavily on IP and royalties which turned down a lot of customers. Evil, according to his superiors.
He made it work. 2008 economic crisis hit. Contracts halved. We ran mostly on royalties for that year. Little to do, so he encouraged us to do research. Anything. A lot of BS came out of it, but also a small gem here and there that would later be useful and one thing became a product.
Moved to a company that did not have royalty income. Most projects were fixed cost, meaning sales people had to hunt for contracts to keep the pipeline filled. Once heard the boss say: “We never have exactly the right amount of projects. I prefer too much projects instead of one too few.” My god, what did they drag in when things went slow. Overpromissing our capabilities, impossible projects, unrealistic deadlines, … The worst part? They were actually the nice guys. Other companies did far worse. It was an eye opener. Lot of crap companies out there hunting for money, predator style, little care for the product.
Anyway, no time to optimize work flows, no time to research and criticize obviously flawed procedures, just get the job done in the specified amount of days or else… The fun part? We were pretty good compared to our competitors. Only mediocre compared to the best though.
The bad part? I noticed that companies that did their due diligence, usually were unable to finish or sell their product. It usually got cancelled. The sloppy ones? They sold their junk successfully. I observed too few projects to make it significant, but the pattern was there.
Successful business? It is not a straight line, I can tell you that.

Bell vs. Academic R&D

By Whateverthisis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Today long-term tech development is heavily done in an academic setting, and while there are some companies that do think long-term (Qualcomm and other telecom companies tend to be on 5-10 year tech cycles, aerospace is on 10-20 year cycles, biotech and life science is on 10-20 year cycles), generally a lot of it has shifted to academic circles and universities now. Unfortunately, I think this has put a damper on things.

One thing Bell Labs did do correctly was by being part of a company, they had the needs and desires of a market and consumers to act as a pull, a “Why” so to speak. Even with some of the more speculative research they did, there was always an eye towards how would this get deployed to a market as a product and thus become a technology available to the broader world. Academia does not have this; most academia lives in a bubble. WHen you read academic papers, they all follow the same outline: 1) there’s a problem in the world, 2) a new technology is hypothesized to solve it, 3) here is an experiment and data to show it cna solve it, and 4) that problem might be solved by this new technology.

While generally most papers I read have mid- to good- experimental design and data and decent conclusions, it’s the first part about a problem that is almost entirely made up from nothing. In my field at least, when I read an academic paper that is supposed to relate to my field, the problem they are identifying isn’t even a problem at all; it has no relevance to the field or what people want. As such the technology is funded, experiments are done, a paper is published, and it dies on the vine because it turns out no one wants it because it was never a problem in the first place.

It’s noticeable that when it comes to silicon and chip-based technologies, academia does very little; the silicon industry basically took it all over through the formation of SRC. SRC unfortunately just got gutted by the Trump administration, but for a long time SRC and the industry ran all of the new technology development; there wasn’t anything like chip architectures or new interconnects or anything coming out of academia at all; it was all industry led and academia only did niche stuff like graphene and organics and the like.

Industry at least provides a pull for a new technology academia has to push it and it rarely results in anything useful. It’s different for different fields, but in my field at least I haven’t found a single university program that’s even remotely relevant; the Bell Labs model is sorely missed.

Typo in summary

By Tim the Gecko • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It should be Arno Penzias, not Arno Penzia.

Did the author miss the biggest issue?

By hdyoung • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
In the room? I actually got a little angry reading that blurb. I was alive when Bell Labs collapsed and I remember the sequence of events very clearly. The number one ingredient that made bell labs a massive success was tax law.

For most of the 1900s, research was tax deductible for companies. Companies could run research labs for the benefit of both themselves and larger society, and Uncle Sam would give them a tax break. The result was a huge ecosystem of top tier corporate labs that bridged the gap between ivory tower research and application. Bell labs was just one of many. There was also GE labs, PARC, IBM labs, Xerox, Kodak. Im probably forgetting a few of the big ones as well. Then, the voters decided that they didn’t like giving companies a tax break for that. I dont remember if it was liberals or conservatives who changed their minds. Maybe both. As soon as that tax break was gone, the managers at each company started requiring each of their lab divisions to actually turn a profit. Every single one of them was closed within a few years, or hung on as a tiny ghost of what it used to be.

Taxes

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Taxes made them successful. We used to have super high taxes for the wealthy and corporations. This created a use it or lose it mentality among businesses because they couldn’t just pocket all the money themselves because it would be taxed up the wazoo at a certain point. There were ways around taxes even back then but they weren’t nearly as effective as they are now where you have billionaires paying an effective tax rate of 0%

Also stock BuyBacks used to be illegal. Stock BuyBacks mean that companies don’t invest anymore they hold on to their cash so that they can do BuyBacks and pump the stock during downturn. This is exactly why stock BuyBacks were illegal for so long.

I don’t think folks realize how much of a role public policy plays in their daily lives or the myriad of knock-on effects from those kind of policies. There’s an idea of a chesterton’s fence, which is a fence that you don’t pull down unless you know damn well why it was put up. High taxes and Wall Street regulation were a classic chesterton’s fence.

Disney Ends $1B OpenAI Investment After Sora’s Surprise Closure. What’s Next?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Just six days ago — and 30 minutes after a Disney-OpenAI meeting about a project with Sora — Disney’s team was “blindsided” with the news Sora was being discontinued, a person familiar with the matter told Reuters, describing OpenAI’s move as “a big rug-pull.”

Even some Sora employees were surprised by the cancellation. It was just 14 weeks ago Disney announced a $1 billion investment in OpenAI’s AI-powered video generation tool — plus a three-year licensing deal. But that deal “never closed,” Reuters adds, citing two other people familiar with the matter, “and no money changed hands.” (Although the two sides are still “discussing if there is another way they can partner or invest with one another, one of the people familiar with the matter said.”)

But Variety wonders if the end of the Sora deal is "a blessing in disguise” for Disney:
Before Disney’s officially sanctioned AI-generated versions of Mickey Mouse, Darth Vader, Baby Yoda, Deadpool and more debuted in OpenAI’s Sora, the AI company abruptly pulled the plug on the video app…

[M]any aficionados of Disney’s franchises were not, in fact, excited about what Sora’s video generator might do to the likes of the Avengers superheroes or the characters from Frozen or Moana. And despite [departed Disney CEO Bob] Iger’s bullishness on the Sora deal, other Disney execs were said to be concerned that going into business with OpenAI would expose the Magic Kingdom’s crown jewels to the risk of being turned into so much AI slop, according to industry sources. Hollywood unions — for which AI adoption has been a hot-button issue — weren’t thrilled about the Disney-Sora deal either. “Disney’s announcement with OpenAI appears to sanction its theft of our work and cedes the value of what we create to a tech company that has built its business off our backs,” the Writers Guild of America said in December… [S]ources say, Disney was encountering roadblocks in getting the OK from voice actors for the Sora pact…

At least publicly, Disney says it is still looking at ways it can tap into the AI ecosystem. The company, in a statement Tuesday, said, “we will continue to engage with AI platforms to find new ways to meet fans where they are while responsibly embracing new technologies that respect IP and the rights of creators.” But at this point, Disney may decide that “meeting fans where they are” means keeping its beloved and world-famous characters away from the AI machinery.
Or, as Gizmodo puts it, “Disney Says It Will Find Ways to Peddle Slop Elsewhere After Pulling Out of OpenAI Deal.”

But Deadline sees the deal’s collapses as a lost opportunity:
The OpenAI partnership was a template on which to build, potentially allowing for other deals that end the exploitation of human creativity by unscrupulous AI models. It was also the kind of partnership that was palatable for the Human Artistry Campaign and Creators Coalition on AI, lobby groups that have been critical of tech business models and command support from A-listers including Scarlett Johansson, Cate Blanchett and Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

Dr. Moiya McTier, an advisor to the Human Artistry Campaign, puts it this way: Part of the problem is getting “artsy people and the techie people to talk.” OpenAI sinking Sora will not make these discussions easier. It’s a move that starkly exposes Hollywood’s vulnerability to the capriciousness of big tech.

Re:Disney’s WAR on Men, White culture, and familie

By MeneM1978 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Wow. Pretty cool to see. Like, EVERYTHING you wrote is false. Even your signature! Well done!

Good

By Frissysan • Score: 3 Thread
Sounds to me like Disney dodged a bullet.

Do Emergency Microsoft, Oracle Patches Point to Wider Issues?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Emergency out-of-band fixes issued by enterprise IT giants Microsoft and Oracle have shone a spotlight on issues around both update cycles and patching,” reports Computer Weekly:
Microsoft’s emergency update, KB5085516, addresses an issue that arose after installing the mandatory cumulative updates pushed live on Patch Tuesday earlier this month. According to Microsoft, it has since emerged that many users experienced problems signing into applications with a Microsoft account, seeing a “no internet” error message even though the device had a working connection. This had the effect of preventing access to multiple services and applications. It should be noted that organisations using Entra ID did not experience the issue.

But Microsoft’s emergency patch comes just days after it doubled down on a commitment to software quality, reliability and stability. In a blog post published just 24 hours prior to the latest update, Pavan Davuluri of Microsoft’s Windows Insider Program Team said updates should be “predictable and easy to plan around”.
Michael Bell, founder/CEO of Suzu Labs tells Computer Weekly that Microsoft’s patch for the sign-in bug follows “separate hotpatches for RRAS remote code execution flaws and a Bluetooth visibility bug. Three emergency fixes in eight days does not shout reliability era.”
Oracle’s patch, meanwhile, addresses CVE-2026-21992, a remote code execution flaw in the REST:WebServices component of Oracle Identity Manager and the Web Services Security component of Oracle Web Services Manager in Oracle Fusion Middleware. It carries a CVSS score of 9.8 and can be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker with network access over HTTP.

What “wider issues”?

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Vibe-coding?

Depends

By The MAZZTer • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I think Microsoft in general does a great job considering they test numerous software packages going back decades, as I understand it.

"

The real question is, each time this happens, do they sit down and have a meeting and discuss why the problem happened, what they can do to keep it from happening again, and then implement a solution in their testing? If so then it’s fine. It’s only if they fail to learn from each emergency that we have a problem.

Same should apply to Oracle.

Also not sure why we’re discussing these specific Microsoft and Oracle bugs. The bugs are not similar at all. Microsoft’s isn’t even a security issue like Oracle’s is.

Apply Betteridge’s Law

By swillden • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

And the law of large numbers. Statistically, there will but patch clusters, the same way there are clusters of every other random-ish event. The fact that one happens to occur right after Microsoft promises a commitment to predictable patch schedules means not just nothing the but opposite. Any commitment to doing better means that they recognize they haven’t been doing well enough, and obviously it’s not possible to do significantly better immediately; changing processes takes time, and observing the effects of those changes takes even longer.

So, no, this cluster of patches doesn’t tell us anything in particular beyond what we already knew: That emergency patches are relatively common.

Yes, at least for Microsoft

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It is called a mountain of technological debt. The whole thing is a fragile mess and cannot be fixed anymore, but any changes come with huge risks. Essentially, fixing one thing breaks three others in surprising and unexpected places. Which is pretty much the pattern we are seeing.

As to that “commitment to software quality, reliability and stability”, that is just them acknowledging there is a serious issue because they understand they cannot hide it. So they decided to at least get some fake appearance of honesty out of it. Of course, the commitment is not real. Same as “Security is our highest priority” stated by MS twice now after massive screw-ups. The screw-ups simply continued after that.

Hence MS will just continue to slowly make things worse, because the mess they made cannot be fixed and their business model requires constant changes in functionality, which the most effective enemy of “quality, reliability and stability”. In a sense, MS products are low key “constant delivery scams”, where the next version or the one after is promised to finally be the one that is great and will make it all worthwhile. They would actually need to throw it (Windows, Office, Azure, etc.) away and start over and they would need to get actually competent and experienced engineers to make the decisions. People which they probably do not even employ anymore and whose value MS management never understood.

Well, guess what, if you massively prioritize revenue over engineering quality, you can, in a over-hyped and immature field, make stellar profits for a while. What you cannot do is deliver a good product. And at some time (and MS is there already), you cannot even deliver a mediocre product anymore.

Re:Depends

By mikeymikec • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Microsoft gutted their QA: https://www.ghacks.net/2019/09…

MacOS 26.4 Adds Warnings For ClickFix Attacks to Its Terminal App

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous Slashdot reader writes:
ClickFix attacks are ramping up. These attacks have users copy and paste a string to something that can execute a command line — like the Windows Run dialog, or a shell prompt.

But MacRumors reports that macOS 26.4 Tahoe (updated earlier this week) introduces a new feature to its Terminal app where it will detect ClickFix attempts and stop them by prompting the user if they really wanted to run those commands.
According to MacRumors, the warning readers “Possible malware, Paste blocked.”

“Your Mac has not been harmed. Scammers often encourage pasting text into Terminal to try and harm your Mac or compromise your privacy....”

There is also a “Paste Anyway” option if users still wish to proceed.

Re:And the Apple haters squawk.

By larwe • Score: 5, Informative Thread
True but useless. For a long complex commandline input, it saves a lot of work to be able to paste it in. Not to mention the possibility that a typo might have undesirable consequences.

Re:Question

By larwe • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Current versions of MacOS have something called “System Integrity Protection” which restricts certain directories from being tampered with even in a su’d shell. It can be disabled, but it’s a very off-label way to run the OS and the consequences could be … spicy.

Re:Question

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Funny Thread

You know run su and then accidentally do something dumb?

I’m pretty sure my Mac will let me run su and then send a text to my ex, but I’m not going to try it.

Re:Question

By caseih • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Yes you can. You have to boot into recovery mode and then change the security level. This is already something you have to do to load third-part (even signed) kexts, which are sometimes required for certain types of presumably poorly written (or not Apple-blessed) hardware drivers.

Apparently this is even still possible on the iPhone chipped MacBook Neo.

Linux is insecure

By TheMiddleRoad • Score: 3 Thread
Linux is generally insecure: https://madaidans-insecurities… What hardening looks like: https://grapheneos.org/feature… Not that all this makes GrapheneOS perfectly secure, but it’s much better than standard Linux distros.

SystemD Contributor Harassed Over Optional Age Verification Field, Suggests Installer-Level Disabling

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It’s FOSS interviewed a software engineer whose long-running open source contributions include Python code for the Arch Linux installer and maintaining packages for NixOS. But “a recent change he made to systemd has pushed him into the spotlight” after he’d added the optional birthDate field for systemd’s user database:
Critics saw it not merely as a technical addition, but as a symbolic capitulation to government overreach. A crack in the philosophical foundation of freedom that Linux is built on. What followed went far beyond civil disagreement. Dylan revealed that he faced harassment, doxxing, death threats, and a flood of hate mail. He was forced to disable issues and pull request tabs across his GitHub repositories…


Q: Should FOSS projects adapt to laws they fundamentally disagree with? Because these kinds of laws are certainly in conflict with what a lot of Linux users believe in.

A. Unfortunately, in a lot of cases, the answer is yes — at least for any distribution with corporate backing. The small independent distributions are much more flexible to refuse as a protest.

If we ignore regulations entirely, we risk Linux being something that companies are not willing to contribute to, and Linux may be shipped on less hardware. I’m talking about things like Valve and System76 (despite them very vocally hating these laws). That does not help us; it just lowers the quality of software contributions due to less investment in the platform and makes Linux less accessible to the average person. We need Linux and other free operating systems to remain a viable alternative to closed systems.

Q. Do you think regulations like these will reshape desktop Linux in the next 5-10 years where we might have “compliant Linux” and “Freedom-first Linux”?

A. Unfortunately, yes, to some degree this is likely. I imagine the split will be mostly along the lines of independent distributions and those with corporate backing.

We’re already seeing it as far as which distributions plan on implementing some sort of age verification and which ones are not, and that sucks. I’d rather nobody have to deal with this mess at all, but this is the reality of things now. As I said in the previous response, the corporate-backed distributions really have no choice in the matter. Companies are notoriously risk-adverse, but something like Artix or Devuan? Those are small and independent enough where the individual maintainers may be willing to take on more risk.

I was actually thinking about what this would look like if we added it to [Linux system installer] Calamares and chatting about that with the maintainers before that thread got brigaded by bad actors posting personal information and throwing around insults. I completely support the freedom for the distro maintainers to choose their risk tolerance. If the distribution is based out of Ireland or something (like Linux Mint) without these silly laws in the jurisdiction the developer operates in, I think that we should leave it up to them to make a choice here.
They think the installer should have a date picker with a flag to disable it, and “We can even default it to off, and corporate distributions using Calamares or those not willing to take the risk could flip it on if they need to. That way if maintainers of the distributions do not wish to collect the birth date, they won’t have to, and no forking is required to patch it out.”

Re:advice to children

By Morromist • Score: 5, Informative Thread

In 2015 Harvard University professor Harvey Silverglate estimated that daily life in the United States is so over-criminalized the average American professional commits about three felonies a day.

I don’t agree with age verification

By dskoll • Score: 5, Informative Thread

I am strongly opposed to age verification.

However, given that the developer faced (according to the article) “harassment, doxxing, death threats, and a flood of hate mail”, maybe we need some form of maturity verification? There’s no call for that sort of crap. And I really hope that criminal charges are filed against anyone sending death threats.

Re:advice to children

By 0123456 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You know why encryption is legal despite Bush and Clinton’s best attempts to prevent it?

Because Gen-X kids risked a decade in jail for breaking Federal law to ensure the code got out there and everyone had it. It simply became impossible to regulate because anyone anywhere in the world could download the code and run it.

Today programmers won’t even say ‘no’ when governments demand they ID all their users.

Re:advice to children

By Morromist • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This guy gets it. Subservience gets you nowhere. Even more so these days.

Laws for slavery

By Firethorn • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’d argue that slavery wasn’t “legal because nobody banned it.” It was legal because there were explicit laws that created, defined, and enforced the institution.

There were statutes specifying who could be held as slaves, rules that the child of an enslaved woman was automatically a slave, procedures for manumission, regulations on how slaves could be bought, sold, punished, or inherited, and laws requiring that escaped slaves be returned. That’s not a legal vacuum, that’s a full legal framework.

It’s similar to how segregation laws later forced discrimination on people who might not have engaged in it otherwise. The state wasn’t passively allowing something; it was actively mandating and structuring it.

Slavery existed because the law built and maintained it, not because the law failed to forbid it.

IBM Quantum Computer Simulates Real Magnetic Materials and Matches Lab Data

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“IBM says its quantum computer can now simulate real magnetic materials and match actual lab experiment results,” writes Slashdot reader BrianFagioli, “which is something people have been waiting years to see.”
Instead of just theoretical output, the system reproduced neutron scattering data from a known material, meaning it lines up with real world physics. It still relies on a mix of quantum and classical computing and this is a narrow use case for now, but it is one of the first times quantum hardware has produced results that scientists can directly validate against experiments, which makes it a lot more interesting than the usual hype.
Classical computers “are not great at modeling quantum systems,” according to this article at Nerds.xyz. “The math gets messy fast, and scientists end up relying on approximations… Quantum computers are supposed to solve that problem…”
If this direction continues, it could start to matter in areas like superconductors, battery tech, and even drug development. Those are the kinds of problems where better simulations can actually lead to better outcomes, not just nicer charts in a research paper.
“I am extremely excited about what this means for science,” said study co-author Allen Scheie from the Los Alamos National Laboratory. In an announcement from IBM, Scheie calls this “the most impressive match I’ve seen between experimental data and qubit simulation, and it definitely raises the bar for what can be expected from quantum computers.”

This is the QC we need!

By Gravis Zero • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Finally, we’re seeing applications of QC that are actually useful. I look forward to this expanding so that we can greatly advance materials science by being able to simulate materials without ever having to construct them.

IBM: The eternal punching bag of Big Tech

By LondoMollari • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Yeah, let me get out infront of the comments that will be full of the usual “Big Blue is so 1970s” snark, because nothing says “edgy” like dunking on the company that literally built the infrastructure the entire digital world runs on.

But let’s be real for a second. While everyone was busy calling IBM boring, stodgy, or “the company your grandpa still uses,” they were out here creating one foundational technology after another:

    The hard disk drive (1956 RAMAC — the first one ever)
    The floppy disk that made personal computing actually personal
    DRAM — the memory chips inside literally every device you own
    The relational database and SQL that power basically the entire internet
    Fortran, the first high-level programming language
    Magnetic stripe cards (you know, the thing that made credit cards and ATMs work)
    Silicon-germanium chips that make your smartphone’s Wi-Fi, GPS, and cellular actually fast

And while we’re on the subject of “irrelevant old tech”: over 87% of the world’s credit card transactions still run on IBM mainframes every single day. Your salary, your rent, your impulse buy at 2 a.m. — all of it humming along on the same “dinosaur” systems the cool kids love to mock.

So sure, pile on the hate. IBM’s used to it. They’ve been the Rodney Dangerfield of computing for decades: “No respect, no respect at all!” But every time you swipe a card, save a file, run a query, or (now) watch a quantum computer match real lab data on magnetic materials you’re standing on IBM’s shoulders. They didn’t just ride the wave. They built the ocean.

Keep innovating, Big Blue. The haters will be back next week to complain about something else you quietly made possible.

This is the first story I’ve heard about IBM

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
…in awhile, that didn’t involve the usual 30K personnel firing we hear about every year. Does this company still make computers?

Sony is Raising PlayStation 5 Prices Again, Between $100 and $150

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Memory and storage shortages and price hikes have “steadily rippled outward across all kinds of consumer tech,” reports Ars Technica.

“Today’s bad news comes from Sony, which is raising prices for PlayStation 5 consoles in the US just eight months after their last price hike.”
The drive-less Digital Edition will increase from $500 to $600; the base PS5 with an optical drive will increase from $550 to $650; and the PS5 Pro is going up from $750 to a whopping $900. At the beginning of 2025, these consoles cost $450, $500, and $700, respectively…

RAM and flash memory chips are in short supply primarily because of demand from AI data centers — memory manufacturers have shifted more production toward making the kind of memory found in AI accelerators like Nvidia’s H200, leaving less for the consumer market. And the situation is unlikely to improve any time soon, barring a major shift in demand from the AI industry.

Some might, I won’t be.

By AgTiger • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

$900 USD is just not worth it for me for console gaming. I’ve already got a PC that works, and games I like for it.

I’m just going into a holding pattern for buying any computing equipment unless I absolutely need to. I suspect I’m going to be in the majority on that.

That’s a bold strategy

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s a 5-year-old gaming console at this point. I’d imagine by now there’s a decent supply of used ones available.

Personally, aside from a Nintendo Switch that I was given as a gift (and it’s basically obsolete at this point), I’m team PC Master Race when it comes to gaming. If you’re buying a console you may as well just take your money outside and light it on fire.

This is getting into Mac territory…

By ctilsie242 • Score: 3 Thread

For this price, I can buy a Mac and go into Mac gaming… …oh wait.

But still, when console prices wind up this high, it only will hurt the software sellers because fewer people will be buying consoles, diminishing the audience of their games.

I would say SOE is eating their seed corn. You want inexpensive consoles so you can sell stuff for them. Basic razor and blade marketing.

Re:Some might, I won’t be.

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Just wait until you see Steam Machine pricing.

It’s not going to come to market in the current politico-economic situation in the US.

Thank you, AI

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
This is pure bullshit. It’s a 5.5 year old console and priced more than it was during introduction! OK, so Sony is overcharging me…well, so is everyone else. Every device is going up in cost, purely due to us subsidizing this LLM circular economy. Fuck every LLM provider. I want useful devices, like consoles, laptops, phones, and tablets…without shortage pricing…not your useless LLMs that can’t even generate code that compiles, Claude 4.6 opus/sonnet. This week, I used it like 10x…EVERY fucking attempt was a failure…“why did I get this exception?”…failure…“update this json schema to validate across 3 fields”…failure. “Update this code to the latest version of Spring”....failure. “Change this legacy for loop into a lambda”…failure…didn’t even compile and hallucinated methods that don’t exist.

I have to listen to employers AI-washing their failures and convincing the industry they can lay us all off.

I have to pay a lot more for any device I want…with the prospect that things aren’t getting better any time soon.

So far, I am not seeing any tangible benefits to these technologies, yet lots of suffering.

This bubble can’t pop fast enough.

I know AI will someday be useful, but it’s been nothing but a curse. Instead of getting slow, steady progress, we’re getting fever-pitched investment that’s not paying off, disrupting the job market, and now making it a lot harder to buy useful technology. Fuck these guys. I am sick of paying for their stupidity.

Thousands of Americans Treated With Psilocybin in 2025

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In a new 4,000-word article, CNN tells the story of a retired appellate paralegal and grandmother in her early 70s who was treated for depression with psilocybin. CNN notes there’s now retreats featuring psilocybin in a few countries — and while psilocybin is illegal under United States federal law, “In Oregon, 5,935 clients received psilocybin services through Oregon’s state-regulated program in 2025.”
High doses of psilocybin are effective in treating depression, a growing body of research suggests, with promise for other conditions, like PTSD and addiction, said Dr. Albert Garcia-Romeu, associate director of the Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research at Johns Hopkins University… Some researchers suggest it disrupts entrenched traffic patterns in the brain or grows new neuron connections to change thinking. Others say the results from psilocybin could have to do with its anti-inflammatory effect, Garcia-Romeu said…

Colorado became the second state to make psilocybin legal with a 2023 law and issued its first healing center” last year. A law adopted in New Mexico last year established that state’s Medical Psilocybin Program, now in development… Psilocybin seems to be “knocking on the door of FDA approval,” said Dr. Lynn Marie Morski, president of the Psychedelic Medicine Association, which educates health care providers on the therapeutic use of psychedelics so they can answer patients’ questions through the lenses of clinical evidence and harm reduction. Psilocybin therapy first received a “breakthrough therapy” designation for treatment-resistant depression from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018, and now psilocybin drug products are on track to be submitted to the FDA for possible approval in the not-too-distant future.

While psilocybin is illegal under United States federal law, more states are creating their own paths for legal use under state laws.


Re:Psilocybin?

By lxnt • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What she meant is that only losers buy drugs on the street, real people have them delivered in less class-denying packages.

You can’t legalize drugs

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Criminalizing drugs completely changes us politics. We learned a long time ago that the reason drugs were criminalized was so that the right wing could go after the left wing because statistically working class people are more likely to take drugs. Nixon’s people came out and just admitted it because they felt guilty. The entire purpose of the drug war was and always is political.

Because of that you are never going to see things like this used properly and legalized which is a shame because psychedelics have been shown repeatedly to be a game changer for people with post traumatic stress disorder. And there are a lot of people with PTSD beyond soldiers.

The catch is that for it to work you need to do it under Dr supervision generally. You need someone there who can carefully guide you through the process. Just dropping a tab of acid isn’t usually going to work. So by criminalizing it an entire group of people whose lives could be transformed or just left out in the cold. But compared to the billions and billions of dollars that can be made using the drug war to win elections that’s a small price to pay.

And of course because we have been conditioned to view talk about politics as dirty anytime you bring this up you’re guaranteed to piss everybody off. It is no coincidence that you are conditioned not to talk about your salary with your coworkers or your political beliefs.

Fun fact the reason rural towns tend to be right wing is because there is usually one extremely wealthy landowner who runs the show and if you deviate slightly from orthodoxy then he’s the only employer in town and he runs the church and everything else and you’re basically persona non grata.

I bring it up because it’s another way that the discussion and debate in our country is locked down to the benefit of people who do not have your best interests at heart

Just ignorant?

By Gravis Zero • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It’s Oregon, where will they find a control group?

You do realize they have Mennonites in Oregon right? If not then you should really educate yourself about the nation you live within because it’s quite diverse. If you think diversity is a bad thing then perhaps you’re in the wrong nation.

It works

By fadethepolice • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I am a medical marijuana patient adn when I travelled this winter I went adn got some gummies at a smoke shop. They were processed in the same facility that produces psilocybin gummies and there was cross contamination. Snapped me out of my depression instantly. Lasted about 2 weeks until I was subjected to another traumatic event.

Re:BOOK: The Mindful Way through Depression

By rayd75 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

You’re holding you wrong. Congrats on your relative positive baseline perception of life. Next, tell people with chronic fatigue about what energizes you, those with diabetes about the “natural sugars” you consume, and those with paraplegia about the pleasure you get from thought experiments.

Pro tip for Amazon or any sales link: Immediately re-sort reviews by time. Interesting how this one had a middling review recently and ~40 5-star reviews without comments within a couple months of the book’s 2024 release.

Linux Maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman Says AI Tools Now Useful, Finding Real Bugs

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Linux kernel maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman tells The Register that AI-driven code review has “really jumped” for Linux. “There must have been some inflection point somewhere with the tools…”
“Something happened a month ago, and the world switched. Now we have real reports.” It’s not just Linux, he continued. “All open source projects have real reports that are made with AI, but they’re good, and they’re real.” Security teams across major open source projects talk informally and frequently, he noted, and everyone is seeing the same shift. “All open source security teams are hitting this right now....”

For now, AI is showing up more as a reviewer and assistant than as a full author of Linux kernel code, but that line is starting to blur. Kroah-Hartman has already done his own experiments with AI-generated patches. “I did a really stupid prompt,” he recounted. “I said, ‘Give me this,’ and it spit out 60: ‘Here’s 60 problems I found, and here’s the fixes for them.’ About one-third were wrong, but they still pointed out a relatively real problem, and two-thirds of the patches were right.” Mind you, those working patches still needed human cleanup, better changelogs, and integration work, but they were far from useless. “The tools are good,” he said. “We can’t ignore this stuff. It’s coming up, and it’s getting better....” [H]e said that for “simple little error conditions, properly detecting error conditions,” AI could already generate dozens of usable patches today.

The sudden increase in AI-generated reports and AI-assisted work has also spurred a parallel push to build AI into the kernel’s own review infrastructure. A key piece of that is Sashiko, a tool originally developed at Google and now donated to the Linux Foundation.
Kroah-Hartman said some patches are being generated with AI now. “You have a little co-develop tag for that now. We’re seeing some things for some new features, but we’re seeing AI mostly being used in the review.”

For me, it is last few months…

By dragisha • Score: 5, Informative Thread

since AI agents became usable and started to bring results.
Of course, you must have skills usually not associated with the manager caste - ask precise questions, be realistic in expectations, and be ready to jump in and fix in ten minutes instead of spending time on 5 prompts. Among others.
So it is not a question about AI being usable or not; it is a question about it being useful enough to cover its expenses and ensure ROI.
An improbable thing to happen.

One thing that would be interesting

By rsilvergun • Score: 3 Thread
If AI ever gets to the point where it can outperform human beings at finding defects then there’s going to be a major issue with world powers.

That’s because right now if you really want to hack somebody’s data you can do it. There is a company out of Israel that will sell you software if you have enough money had enough connections and that software can break into just about any phone in existence. If they can break into the phones they can get past most encryption mechanisms.

So the question is what happens if intelligence agencies and law enforcement can no longer get data when they really want it.

I’m not so naive to think that is going to be a glorious time of freedom.

Facebook for example is facing an existential crisis from AI slop. There is so much slop and it is so hard to tell from the real content they are having a hard time getting data they can sell. Advertising rates are also at risk although it’s less of an issue because as it stands advertising on Facebook is pretty useless and largely done out of habit. But the risk of slop overwhelming their data collection is a much bigger deal.

I bring it up because Facebook didn’t just roll over and die. They are going around the world buying off politicians and getting laws passed requiring age verification that will in turn let them identify real users from bots so that they can continue to collect your data and sell it to their advertisers and governments and whatnot.

My point being that when a large powerful group faces a problem they solve it. And when somebody with that much money in power has a problem and they solve it it’s usually to your detriment and mine.

What I would expect is that we are going to lose more freedoms. And any attempt to save those freedoms will fail because at the end of the day we would have to vote for politicians that would protect those freedoms and I think the 2024 elections proved that it’s pretty easy to get people to do the opposite if you dangle cheap eggs in front of them…

Re:Code review is not what AI is being sold as

By LainTouko • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
In general, the principle problem with LLMs is that they’re completely unreliable, due to the basic design. But in cases where they’‘re just saying “look at this, maybe this is a problem”, reliability is not required because if it makes no sense, someone can just say “no”. The problem comes when people begin to trust them, despite them being completely untrustworthy. Applications where trust is not required are fine.

Re:For me, it is last few months…

By Kisai • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The answer to that is “absolutely not”

If you can’t code worth a damn, then of course the AI is going to find a lot of “bugs” and many of those bugs aren’t even bugs, they generate warnings in the compiler otherwise the program would not compile in the first place. The first thing you do when you want to eliminate bugs is “treat all warnings as errors”

You don’t need AI for that.

I’m sure AI is useful for finding errors that don’t show up as warnings first, but I can tell you first and second hand that your average open source project has thousands of bugs in them, and they’re ignored because the compiler is allowed to ignore warnings, especially those about truncation and incorrect cast’s.

Do not let the AI recommend solutions unless the code going into it is already 100% correct, otherwise you may simply be “unplugging the oil pressure light” rather than servicing the vehicle.

Unfort. e’ryone picked an opinion/side two yrs ago

By Hadlock • Score: 3 Thread

Unfortunately everyone picked an opinion two years ago, when AI was genuinely garbage beyond some basic bash scripts or a top 1000 bug/question on stack exchange (which mostly overlap). AI started getting really good in Dec ‘24, particularly spring ‘25 and by August 2025 even the $20/mo tier of chatgpt was starting to get legit as OpenAI started to try catching up with (now market leader) Anthropic and their blessed claude code. The 4.5/4.6 models released this year are nothing short of incredible, and the Qwen 3.5 series of models are right behind the state of the art models. Google is doing some stuff too but I’m kind of done giving them my money.
 
In 2-3 years we’ll have found all 20,000 top reasons LLMs hallucinate things and solved for 95% of them
 
Creatives rallied against LLMs but as has been proven, nobody actually cares about making funny pictures of , they just want to know that they can.

NASA’s First Nuclear-Powered Interplanetary Spacecraft Will Send Helicopters to Mars in 2028

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
After decades of studying, this week NASA announced “a major step forward in bringing nuclear power and propulsion from the lab to space.”
NASA will launch the Space Reactor-1 Freedom, the first nuclear powered interplanetary spacecraft, to Mars before the end of 2028, demonstrating advanced nuclear electric propulsion in deep space. Nuclear electric propulsion provides an extraordinary capability for efficient mass transport in deep space and enables high power missions beyond Jupiter where solar arrays are not effective.
Steven Sinacore, NASA’s program executive for Fission Surface Power who will also oversee the SR-1 Freedom mission, emphasized to CNN that “On the ground the reactor is off. There’s no radiation coming from it. It doesn’t actually turn on until you’re up in space, and that’s where the radiation comes from.” NASA says they aim to develop the capabilities required “for sustained exploration beyond the Moon and eventual journeys to Mars and the outer solar system.”

And Space Reactor-1 Freedom will carry a fleet of tiny helicopters (much like Ingenuity) to explore Mars, reports Space.com:
Whereas Ingenuity was a technology demonstrator, however, the Skyfall fleet will have concrete tasks. Chief among them is scout: If all goes to plan, the little choppers will help NASA assess the potential of their target area (wherever that happens to be) to support human exploration. The Skyfall helicopters will carry cameras and ground-penetrating radar to scout a future landing site, to understand the slopes and hazards for human-scale landers,” Steve Sinacore, the program executive for NASA’s Space Reactors Office, said during the briefing. “They will also map and characterize the subsurface water ice to find out where the water ice deposits are, along with the size, depth and other important characteristics,” he added…

And that might not be the end of the line for SR-1 Freedom; NASA may decide to keep flying the spacecraft out into the solar system after it deploys the Skyfall choppers, according to Sinacore. The mission architecture, like much of NASA’s exploration portfolio, is not yet finalized.

Queue up …

By PPH • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Send Helicopters to Mars

… Ride of the Valkyries.

‘Ads Are Popping Up On the Fridge and It Isn’t Going Over Well’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
The Wall Street Journal reports:
Walking into his kitchen, Tim Yoder recoiled at a message on his refrigerator door: “Shop Samsung water filters.” Yoder, a supply-chain manager in Chicago, owns a Samsung Electronics Family Hub fridge. He paid $1,400 for an appliance that came with a 32-inch screen on the door that allows him to control other Samsung gadgets, pull up recipes or stream music. But since last fall, it’s been intermittently serving up ads, part of a pilot program being tested on some of Samsung’s smart fridges sold in the U.S. The response? Not warm. “I guess this is another place for somebody to shove an ad in your face,” said the 47-year-old Yoder, recalling the first time he noticed one…

The ads are only on certain Family Hub fridges that have screens and internet connectivity. They run as a rectangular banner at the bottom — part of a widget that also shows news, the weather and a calendar. Samsung declined to say how long the pilot might last or whether it would end. The firm recently unveiled a “Screens Everywhere” initiative that also includes washers, dryers and ovens.... Samsung launched the banner-type fridge ads that come as part of the widget via an October software update. In a footnote of a news release at the time, Samsung pledged to “serve contextual or non-personal ads” and respect data privacy. The banner ads can be turned off in settings.

Samsung said the purpose of the pilot is to explore whether ads relevant to home chores can be useful to owners, and that overall pushback has been negligible. The “turn-off” rate for the pilot ad program remains in the bottom single-digit range, it said… While owners can turn off the banner ads, doing so eliminates the widget altogether, a bummer for Brian Bosworth, a media-industry engineer who liked the feature. Bosworth thinks it’s wrong to take away the new feature as a condition. Wanting to keep the widget but not the ads, the 49-year-old in Edgewater, Md., made sure his home router’s ad-blocking software extended to his fridge. He hasn’t seen another since.
One 27-year-old plans to return his refrigerator after the entire display “lit up with a full-screen ad for Apple TV’s sci-fi show Pluribus,” according to the article. The all-caps ad beckoned him “with an oft-used refrain directed at protagonist Carol Sturka: ‘We’re Sorry We Upset You, Carol.’"

Thanks to Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the article.

What did he expect?

By ebcdic • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Don’t but anything with a screen that doesn’t need it.

Re:What did he expect?

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I’m waiting for the day when they forget to renew a domain and porn ads start showing up.

Re:What did he expect?

By Z80a • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If you’re buying a online computer you can’t control what is installed on it, you should expect it to not work for you.

Re:What did he expect?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Cool. You’ve just described literally ever piece of consumer electronics on the market currently. What do you propose the consumer do? I guess I shouldn’t expect my car to work? My TV? Games console? My home security camera? Lightbulbs?

I should expect none of this to work for me?

What a truly absurd comment. No we should very much expect them to work the way we expect them to, and then rally together to hold vendors accountable when they don’t.

Your view is defeatist and doesn’t help anyone.

Re:What did he expect?

By Smidge204 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

> The premise of a device having “one job” again is the position of a luddite.

No, it’s the position of being anti-enshitification.

A refrigerator’s main function is to keep food cold. That’s the reason you buy a refrigerator. If putting a screen on a TV actually had a demonstrable benefit to that purpose then fine; but it doesn’t. It actually has no objective benefit whatsoever, and the increased complexity not only increases cost but also reduces reliability. That’s literally the definition of enshitification.

If having a computer screen in your kitchen, mounted to your fridge, is that useful… get a tablet and mount it to the fridge. Not only would that be cheaper, but if the tablet fails it doesn’t make the refrigerator scrap metal and vice-versa and you can upgrade one without throwing out the other. Bonus is you can take the table off the fridge and put it where you need it.

I have a leatherman multitool that I keep on me whenever I’m out of the house. It does a lot of things, but it does none of those things as good as a dedicated single-purpose tool of the same kind. It’s a good knife but it will never be as good as an actual knife. It’s a good pair of pliers but it will never be as good as a proper pair of pliers. It’s a decent screwdriver but I will always reach for a normal proper screwdriver if there’s one available. Does it make me a luddite to not want a single item that does all things kinda shitty instead of many items that each do their one thing well?

=Smidge=