Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Why Are Some People Mosquito Magnets?
  2. Sam Altman Testifies That Elon Musk Wanted Control of OpenAI
  3. South Korea Floats ‘Citizen Dividend’ Using AI Profits
  4. Instructure Pays Canvas Hackers To Delete Students’ Stolen Data
  5. Amazon Employees Are ‘Tokenmaxxing’ Due To Pressure To Use AI Tools
  6. Google Announces Its Chromebook Successor: the Googlebook
  7. Microsoft’s $1 Billion AI Data Center Will ‘Switch Off Half of Kenya’
  8. EU To Crack Down On TikTok, Instagram’s ‘Addictive Design’
  9. eBay Rejects GameStop’s $56 Billion Takeover As ‘Neither Credible Nor Attractive’
  10. FCC Says Foreign-Made Routers Can Get Updates Until 2029
  11. First Real-Time Brain-Controlled Hearing Device
  12. Arts and Cultural Engagement ‘Linked To Slower Pace of Biological Aging’
  13. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella Testifies In OpenAI Trial
  14. A Data Center Drained 30 Million Gallons of Water Unnoticed
  15. Digg Tries Again, This Time As an AI News Aggregator

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Why Are Some People Mosquito Magnets?

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
fjo3 shares a report from Phys.org:
Ever felt like mosquitoes bite you while ignoring everyone else? Scientists are now making progress in deciphering the complex chemical cocktail that makes particular people more enticing to these disease-spreading bloodsuckers. “It’s not a misconception — mosquitoes are attracted to some people more than others,” Frederic Simard of France’s Institute of Research for Development told AFP. “But we are not all magnets all the time,” the medical entomologist added.

A range of sensory cues can cause mosquitoes to pick one human over another — mainly the smell and heat our bodies give off, and the carbon dioxide we exhale. Female mosquitoes — which are the only ones that bite — detect these signals with finely tuned receptors, then choose their target accordingly. “We have known for over 100 years that mosquitoes are attracted by the carbon dioxide that we exhale — this is the first signal that triggers their behavior” when they are dozens of meters away, Swedish scientist Rickard Ignell told AFP. Within around 10 meters, “mosquitoes will start detecting our odor, and in combination with carbon dioxide,” this attracts them even more, said the senior author of a recent study on the subject. As they get closer, body temperature and humidity make particular humans even more enticing.

[…] For Ignell’s recent study, the researchers released Aedes aegypti mosquitoes — known for spreading yellow fever and dengue — on 42 women in a lab, to see which ones they preferred. “We have shown that mosquitoes use a blend of odorous compounds (we identified 27 that the mosquitoes will detect, out of the possible 1,000) for their attraction to us,” Ignell said. The woman the mosquitoes most liked to bite — which included pregnant women in their second trimester — produced a large amount of a particular compound made by a breakdown of the skin oil sebum. That even a small increase of this compound — called “1-octen-3-ol”, or mushroom alcohol — made a difference came as a surprise, Ignell emphasized.

Sam Altman Testifies That Elon Musk Wanted Control of OpenAI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman took the stand Tuesday in Elon Musk’s trial against the company, testifying that Musk repeatedly sought control of OpenAI before leaving in 2018. Altman said he opposed putting AI “under the control of any one person,” while Musk’s lawyer used a pointed cross-examination to attack Altman’s trustworthiness. An anonymous reader shares updates from the testimony via the New York Times:
Before Elon Musk left OpenAI in a power struggle in 2018, he wanted to merge the nonprofit artificial intelligence lab with Tesla, his electric car company. Mr. Musk and other OpenAI co-founders met several times to discuss the merger. OpenAI’s chief executive, Sam Altman, was even offered a seat on Tesla’s board of directors, according to a court document. But folding OpenAI into Tesla would have eliminated the lab’s nonprofit status, and that, Mr. Altman said on the witness stand on Tuesday, was something he wanted to avoid. […] “I believed that A.I. should not be under the control of any one person,” Mr. Altman said. […] Mr. Altman testified about his feud with Mr. Musk. He said he had become worried that Mr. Musk, who provided the early investment money for OpenAI, wanted to take control of the lab. He described what he called a “particularly harrowing moment” when his OpenAI co-founders asked Mr. Musk what would happen to his control of a potential for-profit when he died. Mr. Altman said Mr. Musk had replied that the control would pass to his children. “I was not comfortable with that,” Mr. Altman said. When Mr. Musk lost a power struggle for control of the lab, he left, forcing Mr. Altman to find another big financial backer in Microsoft.

But Mr. Altman ran into trouble in 2023 when OpenAI’s board fired him because, as several of its members have testified in the trial, it didn’t trust him. Steven Molo, Mr. Musk’s lead lawyer, homed in on Mr. Altman’s trustworthiness during an aggressive cross-examination. “Are you completely trustworthy?” Mr. Molo asked. “I believe so,” Mr. Altman answered. After questioning Mr. Altman’s trustworthiness for nearly 20 minutes, Mr. Molo turned to Mr. Altman’s relationship with Mr. Musk. Mr. Altman said that after he met Mr. Musk in the mid-2010s, Mr. Musk had occasionally expressed concern about the dangers of A.I. But Mr. Musk spent far more time saying he was worried that companies like Google would get ahead in A.I. development, Mr. Altman said. (Mr. Musk testified in the trial that he had wanted to create OpenAI to prevent Google from controlling the technology.)

Mr. Altman, the lawyer intimated, took advantage of Mr. Musk’s concerns and was never sincere about his own A.I. fears. “Are you a person who just tells people things they want to hear whether those things are true or not?” Mr. Molo asked. The lawyer also questioned whether Mr. Atman, who became a billionaire through years of tech investments, was self-dealing through OpenAI. Mr. Molo showed a list of Mr. Altman’s personal investments across a number of companies that stand to benefit from their association with OpenAI. They included Helion Energy, a start-up that has deals with Microsoft and OpenAI, and Cerebras, a chip maker in business with OpenAI. Mr. Molo asked if Mr. Altman, who is on OpenAI’s board as well as its chief executive, would ever fire himself. “I have no plans to do that,” Mr. Altman said.

OpenAI’s odd journey from nonprofit lab to what it is today — a well-funded, for-profit company that is still connected to a nonprofit called the OpenAI Foundation with an endowment that could be worth more than $130 billion — provided grist for Mr. Molo’s questions about Mr. Altman’s motivations. He implied that Mr. Altman could have continued to build OpenAI as a pure nonprofit. But the only way to build such a valuable charity was to raise billions through a for-profit venture, Mr. Altman responded. Still, the giant sums being raised appeared to upset Mr. Musk. In late 2022, according to court documents, Mr. Musk sent a text to Mr. Altman complaining that Microsoft was preparing to invest $10 billion in OpenAI. “This is a bait and switch,” Mr. Musk said at the time. But Mr. Altman, under questioning from his own lawyers, said: “Every step of the way, I have done my best to maximize the value of the nonprofit. I would point out that there are not a lot of historical examples of a nonprofit at this scale.”
Before Altman took the stand, OpenAI board chair Bret Taylor continued his testimony that began on Monday. He said Elon Musk’s 2024 bid to buy the company’s assets appeared to conflict with his lawsuit and was rejected because the board did not believe OpenAI’s mission should be controlled by one person. “We did not feel like it was appropriate for one person to control our mission,” he said.
Recap:
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella Testifies In OpenAI Trial (Day Nine) Sam Altman Had a Bad Day In Court (Day Eight)
Sam Altman’s Management Style Comes Under the Microscope At OpenAI Trial (Day Seven)
Brockman Rebuts Musk’s Take On Startup’s History, Recounts Secret Work For Tesla (Day Six)
OpenAI President Discloses His Stake In the Company Is Worth $30 Billion (Day Five)
Musk Concludes Testimony At OpenAI Trial (Day Four)
Elon Musk Says OpenAI Betrayed Him, Clashes With Company’s Attorney (Day Three)
Musk Testifies OpenAI Was Created As Nonprofit To Counter Google (Day Two)
Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Head To Court (Day One)

Surprise, surprise, surprise

By CommunityMember • Score: 4, Funny Thread
Musk wanting control? Who might have guessed?

On the next episode of As the Billionaires Turn

By sinkskinkshrieks • Score: 3 Thread
Billionaires 1 whines about billionaire 2 being a big meanie pants to him. Billionaire 2 says “he started it.” Billionaire 1 says “nunnuh.” Billionaire 2 says “I’m telling.”

South Korea Floats ‘Citizen Dividend’ Using AI Profits

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
South Korea’s presidential policy chief is calling for a “citizen dividend" that would return some AI-driven profits and tax revenue to the public. The Straits Times. From the report:
Presidential policy chief Kim Yong-beom said in a Facebook post that a portion of the profits and tax revenue derived from the artificial intelligence boom “should be structurally returned to all citizens.” That is because, Mr Kim argued, the economic gains from AI are based at least partly on industrial infrastructure built by the country over five decades. Mr Kim’s comments come after tens of thousands of people gathered outside Samsung’s main chip hub in April to demand employees get a greater share of AI profits. The company’s labour union wants 15 per cent of operating profit handed to chip-division employees.

The union has threatened an 18-day strike starting May 21. Workers have pointed to rising payouts at SK Hynix, which in 2025 agreed to allocate 10 per cent of its annual operating profit to a performance bonus pool, as evidence they deserve more pay. “Excess profits in the AI era are, by nature, concentrated,” Mr Kim wrote. Memory companies, core engineers and asset holders are highly likely to receive substantial benefits, while much of the middle class may experience only indirect effects.

Re: fuck ai sayo!

By AvitarX • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I think the concept is that if a company announces mass layoffs because AI yountax them per employee.

I assume what would actually happen is honesty in layoffs, notbtax revenue.

Wealth redistribution?

By marcle • Score: 3 Thread

People talk about it like it’s a Commie plot, but if we don’t even out the inequality at least a little, it’s gonna be bad for the economy and bad for all of us.

Re: fuck ai sayo!

By ShanghaiBill • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

If you punish companies for firing, you get less hiring.

Countries with inflexible labor markets tend to have higher unemployment.

Re: fuck ai sayo!

By fortfive • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

But better quality of life overall for regular folks.

AI or no AI there is a massive automation push

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
And it’s going to result in permanent unemployment. It’s debatable how much but we’re not ever going to see full employment ever again. Not with this much automation.

To be thoroughly honest we are cooking the books using sub minimum wage gig work to pretend that we aren’t already well below full employment. I don’t know South Korea’s numbers but here in America there is only one good job for every five americans. A good job here being defined as paying enough that you can afford a modest house, reliable transportation, healthcare and to save for retirement when you’re too old to physically work anymore. No extravagant luxuries per se. But what people used to call a working class living. Basically 50 years and you get to die in peace.

That kind of living is only available to one in five Americans.

We’re going to have to do something and I suspect that something is going to be world War 3. It’s not a coincidence that world War II kicked off when unemployment hit 25%..

I have seen multiple people who got forced to come back into the office complaining about coworkers that work from home or get to go home and finish their day out. Instead of those people demanding work from home for themselves they demand the people around them also are forced to come into the office. Even though the extra traffic on the streets makes their commute worse and means that they don’t get the nicest parking spots.

But if it’s one thing I’ve seen over and over and over again it’s that for the sake of feeling like it’s all fair people cheerfully stab themselves in the back. The animalistic urge for fairness is easily exploitable. Gets us all into a nice little crabs in a bucket situation.

Meanwhile Elon Musk is getting ready to do a massive stock scam worth almost 2 trillion dollars and it’s going to get dumped in all our retirement plans at some point.

Instructure Pays Canvas Hackers To Delete Students’ Stolen Data

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Instructure, the company behind the widely used Canvas learning platform, says it reached an agreement with the hackers who stole 3.5 terabytes of student and university data. The company says it received “digital confirmation” that the information was destroyed and that affected schools and students would not be extorted. The BBC reports:
Paying cyber criminals goes against the advice of law enforcement agencies around the world, as it can fuel further attacks and offers no guarantee the data has been deleted. In previous cases, criminals have accepted ransom payments but lied about destroying stolen data, instead keeping it for resale. For example, when the notorious LockBit ransomware group was hacked by the National Crime Agency, police found stolen data had not been deleted even after payments had been made.

Instructure said in a statement on its website that protecting students’ and education staff data was its primary motivation. “While there is never complete certainty when dealing with cyber criminals, we believe it was important to take every step within our control to give customers additional peace of mind, to the extent possible,” the company said. Instructure did not set out the terms of the agreement but said that it meant that:
- the data was returned to the company
- it received “digital confirmation of data destruction”
- it had been informed that no Instructure customers would be extorted as a result of the incident
- the agreement covers all affected customers, with no need for individuals to engage with the hackers

Pinkie-Swearman Key Exchange

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

‘The company says it received “digital confirmation” that the information was destroyed and that affected schools and students would not be extorted. The BBC reports.’

For a company that makes education software, they sure must think their customers and users are pretty stupid.

This is Bad

By battingly • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This all but guarantees an increase in ransomware attacks. There won’t be any increase in defense against these kinds of attacks because it’s easier and cheaper to pay the ransom. The losers here will be the users because of all the downtime and there will inevitably be leaks anyway.

Paying the ransom is reprehensible since it will cause so much pain for other people in the future, and should be illegal.

Re:SUCKERS

By pegr • Score: 5, Funny Thread

But they have digital confirmation!

Re:SUCKERS

By Fly Swatter • Score: 5, Funny Thread
I hope it is in the form of an NFT, they shouldn’t trust anything else.

Re:“confirmation”

By TwistedGreen • Score: 4, Funny Thread

But they sent a video of someone in a mask drilling out a hard drive!

Amazon Employees Are ‘Tokenmaxxing’ Due To Pressure To Use AI Tools

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Financial Times (via Ars Technica):
Amazon employees are using an internal AI tool to automate non-essential tasks in a bid to show managers they are using the technology more frequently. The Seattle-based group has started to widely deploy its in-house “MeshClaw” product in recent weeks, allowing employees to create AI agents that can connect to workplace software and carry out tasks on a user’s behalf, according to three people familiar with the matter. Some employees said colleagues were using the software to automate additional, unnecessary AI activity to increase their consumption of tokens — units of data processed by models. They said the move reflected pressure to adopt the technology after Amazon introduced targets for more than 80 percent of developers to use AI each week, and earlier this year began tracking AI token consumption on internal leader boards.

“There is just so much pressure to use these tools,” one Amazon employee told the FT. “Some people are just using MeshClaw to maximize their token usage.” Amazon has told employees that the AI token statistics would not be used in performance evaluations. But several staff members said they believed managers were monitoring the data. “Managers are looking at it,” said another current employee. “When they track usage it creates perverse incentives and some people are very competitive about it.”

So basically the AI equivalent…

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

…of those apps that make it look like you are moving your mouse a lot?

Backwards from what they think?

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Given that big companies have already made it clear that they think AI will let them do the same work with fewer people, and given that using AI costs the company a lot in terms of compute resources, it seems intuitively obvious that the only reason execs would want to encourage more AI use is to find out what jobs can easily have their headcount reduced by more use of AI.

The people using the most tokens are the ones for whom more of their jobs can be most easily automated. This is not, IMO, a positive sign for the long-term survival of that particular job role. The only rational response is to use AI just enough to show a speed-up, assuming the speed-up actually happens at all, but not enough to be high up on the chart of AI users. Using it way more than that seems self-defeating.

That which is measured

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

That which is measured is improved.

You want more token usage? You got it!

Re: So basically the AI equivalent…

By SeaFox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Nah, this is more like working at a company that measures your productivity in LoC typed. People making shit long-winded just to game the numbers.

Can’t wait to hear about some big incident because someone automated something unnecessarily to increase their token usage. It will be literally the fault of these policies regarding AI adoption.

Re:That which is measured

By dogugotw • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

A million years ago when I got my first management job I had to attend a training session on ‘Goals and Objectives’, the current in vogue management tool. The instructor impressed on us that ‘you get what you measure’. He used an example of police wanting to improve road safety by measuring the number of moving violation tickets given out. Ticket quantities went through the roof but there was no improvement in accident rates; go figure. What was true in the 70s is still true today.

Google Announces Its Chromebook Successor: the Googlebook

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google is teasing a new line of “Googlebook” laptops for this fall, powered by a new Android-and-ChromeOS-derived operating system that will run Chrome, Android apps, phone-connected apps and files, and deeply integrated Gemini features. The company says Chromebooks will continue “after the launch of Googlebook” and "…all Chromebooks will continue to receive support through their device’s existing date commitment.” The Verge reports:
“We’ll have more to share on the exact OS branding later this year,” Peter Du of Google’s global communications team tells The Verge. […] Googlebooks will have a Magic Pointer feature that offers contextual suggestions whenever you shake your cursor and point it at something on the screen. Google’s examples include setting up a meeting by pointing at a date in an email or selecting images of furniture and a living space to visualize them together. Beyond your mouse pointer, Googlebooks will also feature the custom AI-created widgets that Google is also debuting today for Android phones and Wear OS smartwatches. I don’t know what kind of horrors people will be able to make into widgets, but Google gives the example of making one to organize your flights, hotel information, restaurant reservations, and another for creating a countdown timer for an upcoming family reunion. (It’s always flights, hotels, and restaurants, isn’t it?)

While there are many outstanding questions to be answered about Googlebooks, the biggest and most obvious ones are what will these laptops look like, what chips will be in them, and what will they cost? We’ve got none of that so far. Google only has some initial renders of a mysterious Googlebook and the promise that it’s working with Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, and Lenovo to make the first models. There are no model names. No specs. Nada. Google isn’t even saying if the laptop in its renders is made by a partner or a tease of some first-party Pixel-like Googlebook to come or is just a cool mockup. The one distinct hardware feature shown, the bar of glowing Google-colored light, will be a signature of all Googlebooks. (Sure, bring on the RGB. Why not?)

Worst UX ever?

By thecombatwombat • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“Googlebooks will have a Magic Pointer feature that offers contextual suggestions whenever you shake your cursor and point it at something on the screen. "

Seriously, that sounds awful right? In no way is shaking better than clicking, people will do it accidentally all the time to activate AI they likely don’t even want.

It could be a three finger press, or clicking both buttons, or a right button double click. Literally anything would be better than that . . . right? It sounds like a joke or an ill conceived movie computer.

Re:Worst UX ever?

By Pseudonymous Powers • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Rest assured, if I ever attempt to activate an AI feature, I am currently having, or have already had, a severe stroke.

Re:Terrible name

By Sooner Boomer • Score: 5, Funny Thread

… and we can call the users “Goobers”.

Linux Desktop

By darkain • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“Year of Linux on the Desktop”
“NO, NOT LIKE THAT”

Re:Worst UX ever?

By Local ID10T • Score: 4 Thread

No. Just… Hell no.

I hate this kind of “intuitive UI” shit. It constantly activates when you are trying to use the device and gets it the way of normal operation.

I don’t want to do the “special new thing”… get off my screen!

[shakes fist at clouds] …dammit! Now why is there a contextual pop-up menu in the sky?

Microsoft’s $1 Billion AI Data Center Will ‘Switch Off Half of Kenya’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft and G42’s planned $1 billion AI data center in Kenya has stalled amid disagreements over power commitments, with President William Ruto saying the country would need to "switch off half the country” to support the project at full scale. Tom’s Hardware reports:
The project, announced in May 2024 during Ruto’s visit to Washington, was supposed to bring a geothermal-powered data center to the Olkaria region in Kenya’s Rift Valley. G42 was to lead construction, with the facility running Microsoft Azure in a new East Africa cloud region. The first phase targeted 100 megawatts of capacity and was expected to be operational by this year, with a long-term goal of scaling to 1 gigawatt.

President Ruto isn’t exaggerating about shutting off half the country’s power. Kenya’s total installed electricity capacity sits between 3,000 and 3,200 megawatts, and peak demand reached a record 2,444 megawatts in January, according to data from KenGen, the country’s government-owned electricity producer. The full 1 gigawatt build would therefore have consumed roughly a third of the country’s total capacity, and even the first 100 megawatts would have required a significant share of the Olkaria geothermal complex’s output, which currently generates around 950MW across all its plants.

John Tanui, principal secretary at Kenya’s Ministry of Information, told Bloomberg that the project hasn’t been withdrawn and that talks are continuing, adding that the “scale of the data center they [Microsoft] wanted to do still requires some structuring.” A separate 60-megawatt project with local developer EcoCloud is also still under discussion. […] Microsoft is spending $190 billion on capex in 2026, and the company adds approximately 1 gigawatt of data center capacity every three months globally. But power constraints are proving to be a universal bottleneck: nearly half of planned U.S. data center builds this year have been delayed or canceled due to shortages of electrical infrastructure.

Well, only 1/4 of Kenya

By balaam’s ass • Score: 5, Funny Thread

since it’s Azure, it’ll be down half the time. ;-)

MS Power Plant Time?

By Gilmoure • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Why doesn’t MicroSoft just build a 2000GW power plant first?

Ob.

By greytree • Score: 5, Funny Thread
640 watts should be enough for anyone. And their family.

Re:RoI

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

"…upgrading the grid and capacity to support such a venture could provide economic benefits…”

It could just as easily impoverish the nation. as the “upgrades” could easily be made to serve only the venture while being paid for by the locals.

“Done right” is a matter of perspective. We know the perspective that matters, it isn’t Kenya’s.

Re:When I hear they are going to build a datacente

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“We’ll be happy to sell AI services to folks in Kenya who don’t want the datacenter there. Pony up.”

Who is “we”? The same liars who scripted the first part of your absurd post?

EU To Crack Down On TikTok, Instagram’s ‘Addictive Design’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The EU plans to target “addictive design” features on TikTok, Instagram, and other platforms, including endless scrolling, autoplay, push notifications, and recommendation loops that can steer children toward harmful content. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said new regulation could arrive later this year, alongside an EU age-verification app meant to make child-safety rules easier to enforce. CNBC reports:
“We are taking action against TikTok and its addictive design — endless scrolling, autoplay, and push notifications. The same applies to Meta, because we believe Instagram and Facebook are failing to enforce their own minimum age of 13,” Von der Leyen said. “We are investigating platforms that allow children to go down ‘rabbit holes’ of harmful content — such as videos that promote eating disorders or self-harm,” she added.

The EU’s executive arm has also developed its own age verification app, which has the “highest privacy standards in the world,” according to Von der Leyen. Member states will soon be able to integrate it into their digital wallets, and it can easily be enforced by online platforms. “No more excuses — the technology for age-verification is available,” the EU chief said. The EU Commission could have a legal proposal prepared as soon as the summer, as it awaits the advice and findings of its ‘Special Panel of experts on Child Safety Online.’

Wuhoo! Problem solved!

By Big Hairy Gorilla • Score: 3, Insightful Thread
too bad this is at least 15 year late
We’re in to the doom spiral of multi crises
dumb kids is just one of the results
dumb adults is another

Parents

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Parents need to take some ownership of this issue. My kids were not allowed full Internet access or a cell phone until they were 16 (they are now currently 24 and 25). They rarely use social media because as my one son puts it, “it’s a retard fest wrapped in dogged poo.” It also helps that I or my wife have never used FB, Instagram, TicTac, etc..I always preached to them that “social media” was actually anti-social in nature and not to get wrapped up in it’s BS.

eBay Rejects GameStop’s $56 Billion Takeover As ‘Neither Credible Nor Attractive’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:
EBay on Tuesday rejected a $56 billion takeover bid from the much smaller GameStop over financing doubts, calling the proposal “neither credible nor attractive.” EBay, which has roughly four times GameStop’s market value, also underscored that its turnaround efforts under CEO Jamie Iannone have boosted growth, with its stock returning 201% since Iannone took the position six years ago.

“We have concluded that your proposal is neither credible nor attractive,” eBay Chairman Paul Pressler said in a statement. “eBay’s Board is confident the company, under its current management team, is well-positioned to continue to drive sustainable growth.” He also pointed to concerns with GameStop’s bid, including its financing, its impact on eBay’s long-term growth and the leadership structure of a potentially combined company.
Last week, GameStop’s CEO Ryan Cohen delivered one of the most memorable CNBC interviews in recent memory… initially disinterested, then increasingly hostile, with little eye contact, few real answers to basic questions, and repeated robotic deflections to “check the website.” It’s worth a watch if you have a few extra minutes.

Toystop

By Brain-Fu • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Gamestop charges way too much for used games. I can buy one much cheaper on ebay. Similarly, gamestop pays way too little for used games, and I can sell one for more on ebay. I guess that makes their interest in buying ebay kind of make sense.

The last time I walked into a gamestop I saw walls covered in toys. And trading cards too. The market is clearly shifting.

Re:Toystop

By supremebob • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Wouldn’t the Gamestop/eBay combined company end up with a ton of debt if this deal goes through as planned?

We’ve seen this play out before with private equity buyouts, and it never seems to end well for the combined company.

Wow

By pz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The interview shows the CEO is kind of a jerk. He probably shouldn’t be put in situations where communication is a requirement, like public interviews that are intended to help achieve an aggressive goal.

It’s like he didn’t understand he was on air during the conversation, despite the host clearly calling out that there was an audience listening.

The stark response from eBay is certainly understandable, having seen the interview.

Re:Wow

By AnOnyxMouseCoward • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Hoooly shit. I never watch videos but your comment made me want to check.. and that dude is off his meds (or high on something).

Based on that interview alone, I would sell my Gamestop shares if I were a shareholder. Like… How do you get a CEO like that. Wouldn’t trust this guy to run a car dealership.

Slipped a decimal point?

By dave314159259 • Score: 3 Thread
GameStop has $56billion? Given their turn-of-the-century business model I’d be surprised if they had $56million.

FCC Says Foreign-Made Routers Can Get Updates Until 2029

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FCC has softened its ban on foreign-made consumer routers, allowing vendors to keep issuing broader software and firmware updates for devices already in use in the U.S. through at least January 2029. Dark Reading reports:
Under the original FCC ruling, foreign manufacturers were permitted to provide only limited maintenance and security patches to US customers through March 2027. In a public note (PDF) on May 8, the FCC extended that deadline to at least January 2029 and also expanded the scope of permissible updates. The FCC will now allow foreign manufacturers to provide not just minor security fixes and changes, but also more major software and firmware updates that could affect router functionality, which previously required additional FCC review. The agency described the revisions as intended to ensure the continued safety of already deployed foreign-made consumer routers in the US.
“The FCC likely issued this revision in response to the operational realities of network security and the slow pace of equipment replacement,” says Jason Soroko, senior fellow at Sectigo. “Replacing millions of embedded devices across national infrastructure requires immense time and capital, and abandoning existing systems to a completely unpatched state would create an immediate vulnerability.”
“This waiver significantly alleviates the most pressing fears tied to the initial ban by preventing a sudden and dangerous security vacuum,” added Soroko.

Re: Time

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Not after the bribes are paid.

These agencies have only gotten worse

By MobyDisk • Score: 5, Informative Thread

20 years ago I thought these agencies were incompetent. Now I know that it was actually their peak. The FCC of prior administrations would document their goals, send out a notice for public comment, write a proposed rule set, hold a hearing, the make a rule. Now they make a rule, and everyone goes “That doesn’t even make sense” then they switch it. It’s not just the FCC: It’s the DOJ, DHS, EPA, etc.

Curious

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

How the FCC is powerless to enforce net neutrality while at the same time enforcing bans under the guise of software security.

Re: Time

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Informative Thread
RealID is so important to security, it can’t be used to prove you are a U.S. citizen. So says DHS, the people administering the RealID program.

Re:maybe next time

By dfghjk • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Which one of these is the Ayn Rand laissez-faire capitalism choice? #3, right? Certainly can’t be #1 or #2. Funny how free markets get abandoned the moment nationalism is the priority.

“While were at it, the public till can get raided to inject cash into some American chip makers so they can design but not actually make any chips…”

So #3 is also the communism choice?

"…do fuck all about supply chain risk and the national security and sovereignty implications…”

What are those, other than current administration talking points? Racism against the Chinese sure is complicated.

"…pretend we did not just sell out our grandchildren at the same time.”

Like you did in the last election?

First Real-Time Brain-Controlled Hearing Device

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Researchers at Columbia demonstrated the first real-time brain-controlled hearing system that can identify which speaker a listener is focusing on in a noisy environment and automatically amplify that voice while suppressing others. “This breakthrough addresses the ‘cocktail party effect,’ a major limitation of conventional hearing aids, which often struggle to distinguish between overlapping conversations in noisy settings,” reports Neuroscience News. From the report:
In the new study, Columbia researchers teamed up with surgeons and their epilepsy patients who were undergoing brain surgery to better pinpoint the sources of their seizures. The hospital patients, who volunteered to be part of this study, already had electrodes implanted in their brains. [senior author Nima Mesgarani’s] system used the electrodes to measure the brain activity of the patients as they focused on one of two overlapping conversations played simultaneously. The system then automatically detected which conversation a patient was paying attention to and adjusted the volume in real time, turning up that conversation while quieting the other. For one volunteer, the experience of controlling the system with her brain was literally unbelievable. She accused the researchers of secretly adjusting the volumes. Others told stories about friends and family with hearing impairments who could benefit from such a technology. One person said: “It seems like science fiction.”

[…] The scientists developed real-time machine-learning algorithms that could examine the brainwaves and identify which conversation the patients were paying attention to. Once deployed, their system could rapidly deduce which conversation each listener was paying attention to and make it easier for them to hear it. This happened both when the researchers guided the subjects toward a particular conversation, and when the subjects chose freely, as would be necessary in a real-world conversation. “For this to work in real time, the system has to be very fast, accurate and stable for the experience to feel pleasant for the listener,” Dr. Mesgarani said. The scientists found their new system correctly identified which conversation the volunteers paid attention to. This dramatically improved the intelligibility of the speech the volunteers focused on, reduced listening effort, and was consistently preferred by the volunteers when compared to conversations the system did not provide assistance with. One volunteer recalled her uncle, who had hearing problems. “Can you imagine if this technology existed in a world [where] … he could access it? He might actually live a much more peaceful… life.”
The research has been published in Nature Neuroscience.

Neuralink

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

Neuralink will be the first to do this second.

Advances

By JBMcB • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
My friend has a fancy hearing aid, and it has a setting where it focuses in on the voice of the person he is looking at. I think it’s even called party mode. It cancels most noises except for the closest person his head is aimed at. He can tweak the sensitivity to the point he can clearly hear people talking from several tables away at a noisy restaurant, if he looks directly at the speaker.

Re:This can’t happen soon enough

By flyingfsck • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Yelling doesn’t work either. The problem is SINAD: Signal/(Noise+Distortion). Yelling amplifies the signal and the distortion and makes echos off the walls too. When talking to a deaf person like me, first turn off other sources of sound: TV, radio, lawn mowers, chain saws - get everyone else to shut up and then just talk a little more loudly and a little more slowly maybe as well.

Arts and Cultural Engagement ‘Linked To Slower Pace of Biological Aging’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian:
Singing, painting or visiting a gallery or museum helps people age more slowly, according to the latest study to link taking an active interest in art and culture with improved health. The findings are the first to show that both participating in arts activities and attending events, such as viewing an exhibition, lead to people staying biologically younger. “These results demonstrate the health impact of the arts at a biological level. They provide evidence for arts and cultural engagement to be recognized as a health-promoting behavior in a similar way to exercise,” said Prof Daisy Fancourt, the lead author of the research and the head of the social biobehavioral research group at University College London.

However, slower aging does not necessarily mean someone will live longer. The “epigenetic clocks” used in the study to assess biological ageing are predictive of future morbidity and mortality, and previous studies have suggested a link between arts engagement and longer lifespan, but much more research would be needed to establish potential causal effects on longevity. Those who take part in artistic pursuits the most often slow the pace of their biological aging the most. Under one of the study’s methods of assessment, those who did so at least weekly slowed their aging process by 4%, while monthly engagement led to it slowing by 3%.

Similarly, another of the tests showed that those who undertook an arts activity at least once a week were on average a year younger biologically than those who rarely engaged in such pursuits. Those who exercised once a week were only six months younger by that measure. The benefit the arts confer on the pace at which people age is so dramatic that it is comparable to the difference between smokers and those who have given up smoking, the researchers say. The results, published in the journal Innovation in Aging, are based on blood test and survey response data from 3,556 adults taking part in the UK Household Longitudinal Study. It uses blood samples to estimate people’s biological age and the pace at which they are ageing.

Weird

By liqu1d • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Whenever I sing people around me seem to get older very quickly.

That makes sense.

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Cultural engagement and it’s “lower” form, escapism, basically represent tribal social engagement and exploration of the unknown/new, you know, the things we previously evolved to be good at. That this sort of activity provides purpose, meaning and connection and thus educes stress totally makes sense.

I personally see and experience an amplified version of this in close embrace social dancing (massive health benefits, scientifically proven) and due to my diploma and experience in performing arts. It basically makes me 15-20 years younger than my peers.

Self-selection

By glatiak • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

An interesting theory but hiding a demographic detail. Participation in the arts passively and actively is not uniform across all socioeconomic groups but tends to cluster around certain economic and cultural groups. We think one needs early exposure and the resources to become involved — suggesting perhaps that these folk have a bit more control over their lives leading to lower stress. Have artists and musicians in the family and have seen up close the struggles — but also the rewards of creating and enjoying the creation of others. Personally, perhaps more exposure as part of the education process might make us all better peoplea. But the question might be which is the tail and which the dog?

Art or just Stopping to Smell the Roses

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I wonder if it really has much to do with “art and culture” as much as just general attitude and a sense of greatfulness.

Taking the time sit an look at painting an appreciate it as beautiful or fascinating or singing and taking the time work at it and make it sound right places one in a frame of mind and we know the many parts of the body are impacted by mental state either directly or indirectly thru hormone responses etc.

My question would be do you get the same benefit if say you make a habit of going for a non-strenuous hike and sitting on log for a while contemplating a unique tree, or an expansive vista, or study a wild flower. Maybe you sit and listen to a brook. Does it even have to be nature what if you sit on a park bench and appreciate the architecture of the surrounding city (though that might be clutre/art again in the way the museum is so lets go with watch some children playing or something instead.

  I am not trying to devalue art and culture but simple recognize what those things are is a matter frequently contested. It is therefore difficult say ‘cultural appreciation is good for you’ beyond well these specific activities in the study seem to help slow aging. I also think a lot of those things are less than accessible to everyone. Certainly a walk in the woods or over the prairie might not be either if you live in an urban center; maybe the art museum is more accessible, or the park bench. For the rural or suburban dweller the outdoors might be the best options, especially if your elderly and dont drive. My point is simply that beautiful and interesting things big and small worth spending some time to stop and consider are actually everywhere and maybe just that act is really the key here.

Re:That makes sense.

By Rei • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I don’t think it has anything to do with that. As soon as I saw the headline, my mind went “cohort study”. And sure enough, yeah, it’s a cohort study. Remember that big thing about how wine improves your health, and then it turned out to just be that people who drink wine tend to be wealthier and thus have better health outcomes? And also, the “sick quitter” effect, where people who are in worse health would tend to stop drinking, so you ended up with extra sick people in the non-wine group? Same sort of thing. This study says they’re controlling for a wide range of factors, but I’d put money on it just being the same sort of spurious correlations.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella Testifies In OpenAI Trial

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Musk v. Altman trial entered its third week Monday, with Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and former OpenAI co-founder and renowned AI researcher Ilya Sutskever taking the stand. Nadella testified that Elon Musk never raised concerns to him that Microsoft’s investments in OpenAI violated any special commitments, and said he viewed the partnership as clearly commercial from the start. He also described OpenAI’s 2023 board crisis as “amateur city.”

Meanwhile, Sutskever testified that he had raised concerns about Sam Altman because he feared OpenAI could be “destroyed.” He expressed concerns about Altman’s behavior to the board, in part because he said he felt “a great deal of ownership” over the startup. “I simply cared for it, and I didn’t want it to be destroyed,” Sutskever said. CNBC reports:
Nadella said he was “very proud” that Microsoft took the risk to invest in OpenAI when “no one else was willing” to bet on the fledgling lab. Musk, who testified late last month, said Microsoft’s $10 billion investment was the key tipping point that made him believe OpenAI was violating its nonprofit mission. He testified that the scale of the investment bothered him, and it prompted him to open a legal investigation into OpenAI. “I was concerned they were really trying to steal the charity,” Musk said from the stand.

Nadella said he did not believe Microsoft’s investments in OpenAI were donations, and that there was a clear commercial element to their partnership from the outset. He said during the partnership’s early years, Microsoft gave OpenAI sharp discounts on computing resources, and Microsoft believed it would reap marketing benefits from doing so. During a separate video deposition that was played on Monday morning, Michael Wetter, a corporate development executive at Microsoft, said the company has recognized approximately $9.5 billion in revenue to date through its partnership with OpenAI as of March 2025.

[…] Nadella said he was “pretty surprised” by the board’s decision [to fire Altman in November 2023], and that his priority was to try and figure out how to maintain continuity for Microsoft customers. Immediately after Altman was removed, Nadella said he made an effort to learn more about what happened, adding that he suspected jealousy and poor communication was at play. During conversations with OpenAI board members after the firing, Nadella said he was simply trying to understand the language in the OpenAI’s statement about Altman being “not consistently candid” while communicating with the board. That language, Nadella said, “just didn’t sort of suffice, because this is the CEO of a company that we are invested in and we’re deeply partnered with, and so I felt that they could have explained to me what are the incidents or what is the detail behind it.” There must have been instances of jealousy or miscommunication that could have justified pushing out Altman, Nadella said. He wanted more depth from the board members after the remark about candor, but no such information was available, he said. “It was sort of amateur city, as far as I’m concerned,” Nadella testified.

[…] Musk testified that he is not entirely against OpenAI having a for-profit unit, but he said it became “the tail wagging the dog.” He repeatedly accused Altman and Brockman of enriching themselves from a charity while also reaping the positive associations that come from running a nonprofit. “Microsoft has their own motivations, and that would be different from the motivations of the charity,” Musk said from the stand. “All due respect to Microsoft, do you really want Microsoft controlling digital superintelligence?”

During a videotaped deposition shown in court last week, former OpenAI director Tasha McCauley recalled a discussion with Nadella and her fellow board members after the 2023 decision to dismiss Altman as OpenAI’s CEO. “To the best of my recollection, Satya wanted to restore things to as they had been,” McCauley said. The board members didn’t think that was the right move, she said. But as a court witness on Monday, Nadella said he never demanded that the board reinstate Altman as OpenAI CEO.
Recap:
Sam Altman Had a Bad Day In Court (Day Eight)
Sam Altman’s Management Style Comes Under the Microscope At OpenAI Trial (Day Seven)
Brockman Rebuts Musk’s Take On Startup’s History, Recounts Secret Work For Tesla (Day Six)
OpenAI President Discloses His Stake In the Company Is Worth $30 Billion (Day Five)
Musk Concludes Testimony At OpenAI Trial (Day Four)
Elon Musk Says OpenAI Betrayed Him, Clashes With Company’s Attorney (Day Three)
Musk Testifies OpenAI Was Created As Nonprofit To Counter Google (Day Two)
Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Head To Court (Day One)

Re:Is anybody here a lawyer in the applicable law?

By Njovich • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Are you challenging my constitutional right to spew my nonsense online?

“Amateur city”?

By fuzzyfuzzyfungus • Score: 3 Thread
I’m…curious…if Nadella’s assessment of the board had to do with some deficiency in keeping minutes; or if he’s just shocked into incomprehension by the idea that the board would fire you for anything aside from failing to make line go up or some really sordid sex thing that is going to reach public knowledge real soon.

For basically any employee “is lying snake who none of us can trust about anything he says” would seem like it does the job, especially with the fairly limited US requirements for firing people; so it’s hard for me to see that as an obviously amateur move unless they were either chaotic in some visibly horrifying way about it; or he is just applying his own theory of what the board should and shouldn’t fire you for (and to what, at least theoretically, is a nonprofit board that was supposed to be keeping the c-suite on-mission; not just appeasing the shareholders).

A Data Center Drained 30 Million Gallons of Water Unnoticed

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A Georgia data center developed by QTS used nearly 30 million gallons of water through two unaccounted-for connections before residents complained about low water pressure and the county utility discovered the issue. “All told, the developer, Quality Technology Services, owed nearly $150,000 for using more than 29 million gallons of unaccounted-for water,” reports Politico. “That is equivalent to 44 Olympic-size swimming pools and far exceeds the peak limit agreed to during the data center planning process.” From the report:
The details were revealed in a May 15, 2025 letter from the Fayette County water system to Quality Technology Services, which outlined the retroactive charge of $147,474. The letter did not specify how many months the unpaid bill covered, but when asked about it Wednesday, Vanessa Tigert, the Fayette County water system director, said it was likely about four months. A QTS spokesperson said the timeframe was 9-15 months. Once the data center was notified, it paid all retroactive charges, a QTS spokesperson said in an email, noting the unmetered water consumption occurred while the county converted its system to smart meters.

The Fayette County water system confirmed the data center’s meters are now fully integrated and tracked. Tigert, the water system director, blamed the issue on a procedural mix-up. “Fayette County is a suburb, it’s mostly residential, and we don’t have much commercial meters in our system anyway,” she said. “And so we didn’t realize our connection point wasn’t working.” The incident became public last week when a county resident obtained the 2025 letter to QTS through a public records request and posted it on Facebook, prompting outrage from residents concerned about the data center’s water consumption. […]

Tigert, who sent the 2025 letter to QTS, said the utility didn’t know about the water hookups because the connection process “got mixed up” as the county transitioned to a cloud-based system while also trying to accommodate an industrial customer. Tigert also said her staff is small and at capacity. “Just like any water system, we don’t have enough staff. We can’t keep staff,” she said. “I’ve got one person that’s doing inspections and plan review, and so he’s spread pretty thin.” She said it’s possible her staff did know about hookups but that she hadn’t been able to locate the inspection report. “I may have hit ‘send’ too soon,” she said about the 2025 letter to QTS. While the utility charged the data center a higher construction rate for the unapproved water consumption, Tigert confirmed the utility did not penalize or fine the data center.
For what it’s worth, the Blackstone-owned company says its data centers use a closed-loop cooling system that does not consume water for cooling. The reason for last year’s high water use, according to QTS, was the temporary construction work such as concrete, dust control, and site preparation.
Once the campus is fully operational, it should only use a small amount of water for things like bathrooms and kitchens. But that point could still be years away, as construction and expansion in Fayetteville may continue for another three to five years.

This is just pandering

By physicsphairy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The myth that AI data centers are using up all the water comes from some incorrect citations that have then swept through sensationalist and poorly fact-checked (looking at you Washington Post) news stories. One major contributor was Karen Hat’s “Empire of AI” which overstated the usage by three orders of magnitude. (She did publicly correct that, but you can guess how many people are interested in the non-sensational numbers).

For proportion, California almond growers use 90x the fresh water of all US data centers combined.

Which is not to say that a data center can’t still be a strain for some communities, but not in a more extraordinary way than e.g. the local university wanting to maintain a golf course.

But “AI IS SUCKING UP ALL THE WATER PEOPLE NEED TO SURVIVE!!!” is a wonderfully concrete - if completely false - complaint for people uneasy about the recent advances in technology to latch onto

For what it’s worth, the Blackstone-owned company says its data centers use a closed-loop cooling system that does not consume water for cooling. The reason for last year’s high water use, according to QTS, was the temporary construction work such as concrete, dust control, and site preparation.

Once the campus is fully operational, it should only use a small amount of water for things like bathrooms and kitchens. But that point could still be years away, as construction and expansion in Fayetteville may continue for another three to five years.

So this has nothing to do with the building being a “data center” at all. The water used if for construction and it could just as well be a stadium or an apartment complex. But since people are talking about data centers using water we’ll take any opportunity to jump in on that even if it’s amplifying a misconception by mentioning it in adjacency to unrelated events.

Utility not auditing it’s service

By Todd Knarr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The most concerning part should be that the utility isn’t auditing it’s service. The most basic check is to compare water pumped or otherwise brought into the system against water usage billed to customers. Those two numbers should be equal, any discrepancy indicates leaks or other unaccounted-for draws. Any discrepancy should also be relatively stable, with any large variations correlated to known main breaks. You especially audit things immediately after a major change like bringing smart meters on-line to catch problems like this.

Better title:

By davidwr • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Bureaucratic slip-up allows facility under construction to delay paying for water bill for several months. Coincidentally, facility happens to be a data center.”

Re:But the real cost is increased service prices

By lucifuge31337 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

there’s no long term impact. it’s just for construction.

read TFS which, this time, does include very relevant info. that shows the headline and TFA is mostly “bury the lede” FUD:

That’s never how this works out. Water is cheaper than electricity for cooling so the more water you use the less you spend, whether that’s literally just dumping water back into the sanitary sewer system or through evaporative chillers. In nearly every circumstance these facilities are doing the calculations to figure out which is cheapest and what they can get away with.

Trusing what comes out of Blackstone publicity persons mouth is painfully naieve in any context, bur especially so in light of the history of how these facilities operate.

Re:This is just pandering

By Targon • Score: 5, Informative Thread

There is something a bit more fundamental at work here. If any single business requires ANY utility to upgrade its infrastructure to deliver power, water, or other things, then that one business should be required to pay for ALL of those infrastructure upgrade costs. Why should the local community be expected to cover the expenses that are ENTIRELY caused by a single business? Yes, water usage and power draw by themselves are something to be concerned with, but this comes back to the old idea of “socialism for the wealthy and rugged individualism for everyone else” being seen as a major problem. SOCIETY should not be paying businesses to make the owners even more wealthy while contributing very little to the local community. You can be sure that town board members that are the ones who keep approving these things have their members getting paid off while the community ends up paying the price. Suggesting those people should just be voted out is the sort of clueless comment that often comes back, because those running for office tend to be wealthy themselves, or they are retired and have enough money where they don’t care what happens to those who still need to work for a living.

Digg Tries Again, This Time As an AI News Aggregator

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Digg is relaunching again, this time as an AI-focused news aggregator rather than the Reddit-style community site it recently abandoned. TechCrunch reports:
On Friday evening, the founder previewed a link to the newly redesigned Digg, which now looks nothing like a Reddit clone and more like the news aggregator it once was. This time around, the site is focused on ranking news — specifically, AI news to start. In an email to beta testers, the company said the site’s goal is to “track the most influential voices in a space” and to surface the news that’s actually worth “paying attention to.” AI is the area it’s testing this idea with, but if successful, Digg will expand to include other topics. The email warned that the site was still raw and “buggy,” and was designed more to give users a first look than to serve as its public debut.

On the current homepage, Digg showcases four main stories at the top: the most viewed story, a story seeing rising discussion, the fastest-climbing story, and one “In case you missed it” headline. Below that is a ranked list of top stories for the day, complete with engagement metrics like views, comments, likes, and saves. But the twist is that these metrics aren’t the ones generated on Digg itself. Instead, Digg is ingesting content from X in real-time to determine what’s being discussed, while also performing sentiment analysis, clustering, and signal detection to determine what matters most. […] The site also ranks the top 1,000 people involved in AI, as well as the top companies and the top politicians focused on AI issues.

Somebody is trying to get investors

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I remember when you could add crypto to the name of your company and your stock would shoot up because bots were buying any stock with a crypto in the name. AI has the same bullshit going on.

It sounds like he’s just doing basically like a Google search for a news topic. Using Twitter chat as the source to determine what the highest ranking search result is. To limit the amount of searching he’s doing and to get attention he’s focusing on news stories discussing AI.

There is absolutely nothing new here he’s just trying to use an algorithm to pick up popular news stories and display them on his website. And he is limiting the type of news stories to ones that discuss AI.

It sounds like a big thing until you actually stop and think about it. It’s still just a shitty aggregator just an automated shitty aggregator…

It’s not going to go anywhere as far as people using it but throwing the words AI here and there might get some clueless investors to give him some money. But man this reeks of desperation

Someone Digg its grave, please

By mabu • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It’s dead, Jim.

It’s not coming back.

Still missing it’s true potential

By outsider007 • Score: 4, Funny Thread

As a hookup app for miners and archaeologists.

Digg needs dugg a grave

By forrie • Score: 3 Thread

Just let it die, the world has moved on.