Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Google’s Anti-search-scraping Lawsuit Dismissed
  2. Wildfires, Evacuations, and Smoke Hit Europe and North America
  3. AI-Equipped Garbage Trucks Could Soon Start Spying On People in the US
  4. Is Huawei Building Its Own DRAM Fab?
  5. Three Astronauts Safely Return from Space Station, Landing in Kazakhstan Steppe
  6. Typo-Squatting Scammers Con South Carolina Town Out of $545K
  7. A Promising Process For Nuclear Fuel Re-use and Disposal?
  8. Comic-Con 2026 Debuts Trailers for ‘Coyote vs Acme’ Movie, Plus ‘Neuromancer’ and ‘Blade Runner 2099’ Series
  9. 32 of 35 Students Caught Using Hilariously Wrong AI-Generated Answers for Professor’s Midterm
  10. Firefox’s New Tab Page Will Get Widgets - Including an AI-Powered Daily Crossword
  11. Did Virginia Regulators Downplay Data Center Health Concerns?
  12. Drying Lakebeds Are Releasing Massive Amounts of Carbon, Study Finds
  13. Hyundai Claims Humanoid Robot Plan Is Not Part of Talks With Striking Workers
  14. Amazon Cracks Down On Use of AI Images By Sellers
  15. Top Online Sites Debate Cutting Off Google’s Crawlers

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Google’s Anti-search-scraping Lawsuit Dismissed

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A U.S. district court “has dismissed Google’s case against SerpApi over that company’s scraping of search results to train AI models,” reports Computerworld. Google had claimed that it was protecting copyright holders — and that SerpApi’s actions breached America’s Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA):
[Google] made two claims: first, that no person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title, and second that no person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, or component protected by the Act. SerpApi claimed that the URLs and other links that were being served by Google did not in themselves entail copyright and the judge agreed. In her judgment, she said that there was no indication that the copyright holders had authorized Google to take action against SerpApi.

The case is not completely over as the judge has given Google 21 days to amend its complaint to demonstrate that it was acting on behalf of the copyright owners.
SerpApi’s CEO reacted to the court’s ruling as “a win not just for SerpApi, but for all who depend on an open internet. We’re pleased that the court rejected Google’s attempts to expand the DMCA to assert control over access to public pages. The internet’s founding principle — open access to usable information — is essential to driving innovation and ensuring everyone benefits from the promise of data. SerpApi will continue supporting developers, AI companies, researchers, and businesses that rely on access to public search information.”

Some analysis from Daring Fireball blogger John Gruber:
I’ve come around on SerpApi in the last few months. My initial take was that it surely must be illegal for a company to scrape Google’s search results and offer access to that data as an API. But I’ve come around to the argument that what SerpApi is doing to obtain Google search results is, well, exactly how Google scrapes the rest of the entire web to build its search index. It’s all just scraping publicly accessible web pages. This December piece by Mike Masnick at Techdirt is what began to change my mind.
In fact, Masnick wrote, Google “built its entire business on scraping the web without asking permission first. And now it wants to use one of the most abused provisions in copyright law to stop others from doing something functionally similar to what made Google a tech giant in the first place.”

Now Google is even getting heckled about the decision on social media. “If Google wants to refile the suit within the allowed 21 days, it has to admit that site owners have copyright protection of their work and THAT would open the door to them suing Google for scraping their content for AI Overviews.”

Wildfires, Evacuations, and Smoke Hit Europe and North America

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
270,000 people have been displaced by wildfires in France and Spain, reports the Guardian. A wildfire even forced evacuations in Scotland.

And wildfires “have now scorched four million acres of land in the U.S.,” reports NPR, as tens of millions of people in North America “are continuing to endure hazardous smoke from out of control wildfires burning across Canada and the Western U.S.”

At America’s National Interagency Fire Center, NPR’s wildfire correspondent says all of America’s firefighting resources have now been deployed across the country. “So if we get another big fire, we’re in trouble… International aid could be harder to come by if the situation in Southern Europe gets worse and firefighters are going to be needed there.”

Meanwhile Toronto was blanketed this week “with eye-watering, cough-inducing soot,” writes a climate-change reporter for the Toronto Star newspaper, “briefly giving us the worst air quality in the world.” But looking to the future after a wildfire that’s 50% larger than any in Ontario’s history (315,000 hectares or 778,331 acres), he had this to say about the eye-watering smoke. “It will be back.” The article’s headline warned of “Our smoke-filled future” and how Canada “must prepare for bigger wildfires, every summer — forever.”
Even if global carbon emissions were cut dramatically, so long as any greenhouse gases are being put into the atmosphere, climate scientists say the world will continue to get hotter. And as the temperature rises, the forests dry out and the wildfires will get bigger, stronger and more frequent. “It’s not going to get better. It’s going to get worse,” said Edward Struzik, a fellow with the Institute for Energy and Environmental Policy at Queen’s University and the author of Dark Days at Noon: the Future of Fire . “These fires aren’t going away. Toronto is going to get smoke every summer....”

The best solution would have been to dramatically cut emissions years ago. The harsh scientific reality is there’s nothing we can do to stop wildfire smoke from blanketing cities for a few days every summer — and it’s going to continue for decades to come. We’re all going to need to buy air purifiers and masks and get used to it....

“The idea that we can thin our way through the boreal forest boggles the mind,” [says Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist at Berkeley Earth, an independent non-profit research organization]. “There aren’t enough people in Canada to do that.” The boreal forest in Canada is an enormous and largely roadless expanse bigger than the entire European Union. In comparison, America’s much smaller forests are criss-crossed by roads, making firefighter access much quicker and easier. And the nature of the forests is fundamentally different as well, said Hausfather, who wrote an article summarizing research on the subject. “Western U.S. forests have evolved for frequent low-level fires that burn out the undergrowth — usually every five to 30 years,” he said. “Historically, before fire suppression, fires would burn through, and they wouldn’t actually kill the trees. They’d just kill smaller trees and clear out the brush.”

“The boreal forest is a fundamentally different beast,” he said. “It’s an ecosystem designed to burn.” With smaller, more densely packed trees, the boreal is wetter and colder and doesn’t burn anywhere near as often — every 100 to 200 years on average, Hausfather said. But when fire does erupt, it’s often much more intense, burning up into the canopy and levelling everything in its path… Clearing out the dead wood on the ground wouldn’t prevent, or even slow, the canopy fires that sweep the boreal, said Hausfather.

I was in Bordeaux in May

By jfdavis668 • Score: 3 Thread
Hate to see all those coastal forests burning. It is a lovely place.

AI-Equipped Garbage Trucks Could Soon Start Spying On People in the US

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
America’s garbage trucks can do more than just collect trash, reports Newsweek. They may also help identify code violations using AI.
Officials in Cape Coral, Florida, recently considered equipping sanitation trucks with AI-powered cameras that would photograph properties as crews complete their normal collection routes. The system would have been designed to identify potential issues such as overgrown lawns, peeling paint, and illegal dumping, and to flag violations so the city staff can review them later before taking enforcement action… However, in a statement on July 13, Cape Coral officials said it would not be moving forward with the camera technology, citing cost issues and insufficient benefits.

“Claims suggesting that this technology would automatically identify, cite or fine residents are inaccurate,” the statement also noted… Cape Coral officials say that a camera system in the future would assist — not replace — human code enforcement officers, and employees will review any AI-generated alerts before violations are issued. “Even if such a system were to be considered in the future, any potential code violations would require review and verification by a Code Compliance Officer before any enforcement action could be taken,” the organization wrote.
But Cape Coral, Florida “is not the first city to explore the technology,” the article notes.
AI imaging systems developed by City Detect have already been deployed in several municipalities. According to the company’s published case studies, Stockton, California, used the platform to analyze nearly 40,000 parcels, capturing almost 200,000 images while identifying thousands of potential code issues. Cathedral City, California, has also used the technology to assist code enforcement, while Dallas approved funding for a similar program pending final implementation.
Thanks to Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the article.

Is Huawei Building Its Own DRAM Fab?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
From the site tech-news site XDA Developers:
The consumer tech economy needs more DRAM manufacturers, and it needs them more urgently than perhaps at any point in its history. Anyone keeping track of the pricing trends will know that memory prices have climbed into the stratosphere on the back of AI infrastructure’s relentless demand, and every consumer device that depends on RAM has traveled from inflated to unaffordable, quarter after quarter, with almost no relief in sight. Which is exactly why a story out of Shenzhen is worth paying attention to, even in its current rumor phase. According to the details circulated by various semiconductor analysts on X, the Chinese government, DRAM maker SwaySure and Chinese tech giant Huawei have partnered to set up a 12-inch memory production plant. If the reports hold up, it could change memory economics for years to come, but not necessarily in the way you’d hope…

SwaySure itself is a known player. The company was registered in Shenzhen in March 2022, is reportedly backed by municipal government, and appears alongside Huawei on the US Commerce Department’s Entity List, suggesting Washington has realized the connection between the two entities. Although, that’s also where the story becomes a little less straightforward. None of these claims have been independently confirmed, and many of the technical details circulating online trace back to a single X account. Huawei has previously denied operating the wider network of state-backed fabs that analysts have reported. Even the widely quoted figure of 140,000 wafers per month isn’t new, and public records indicate SwaySure’s production line is already operational. What gives the report weight, then, is the fact that Huawei has spent years building this kind of domestic semiconductor ecosystem through partners that appear to operate independently.

The rationale that analysts on X keep revisiting has little to do with consumer memory. Huawei’s Ascend AI accelerators require high-bandwidth memory (HBM), and US export controls have all but cut Chinese entities from procuring HBM from Samsung or SK Hynix… Owning the supply outright solves a problem that purchasing power can’t, which is why the DRAM push is read as a bid to secure captive HBM for Huawei’s own silicon rather than to flood the market with cheaply manufactured DDR5… The catch, however, is the fact that most of this new and rejuvenated capacity is expected to be absorbed by China’s own domestic demand, rather than to relieve the global shortage… This development does not seem to be an isolated incident, given the state of DRAM economics. CXMT, China’s largest manufacturer of DRAM, is already running close to 265,000 wafer starts per month as of now as per analyst estimates, and is projected to hit 350,000 by the end of the year, bringing it within the touching distance of Micron’s estimated 385,000....

[T]he oligopoly seems to be facing the first credible challenge to its capacity discipline in decades, and it seems to be coming from a country building fabs much faster than the competition could hope to match. Now, whether it tangibly impacts the consumer market economics in the time to come may be a story in its own right in a few years, but for now, for what it’s worth, it’s a new direction, and much of it feeds optimism.

Three Astronauts Safely Return from Space Station, Landing in Kazakhstan Steppe

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Welcome home!” NASA posted on X.com, sharing footage of a successful “parachute-assisted” landing on a Kazakhstan steppe for the Soyuz MS-28, carrying three astronauts who’d spent 241 days on the International Space Station. (And YouTube has a full two-hour video with NASA’s coverage of the landing.)

A NASA web page notes they orbited Earth 3,856 times and traveling more than 102 million miles after docking with the Space Station on November 27. It was the first mission for NASA astronaut Chris Williams and Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergei Mikaev (and the second mission for Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergey Kud-Sverchkov). “After routine post-landing medical checks, recovery teams will fly the crew by helicopter to Karaganda, Kazakhstan. Williams then will board a NASA aircraft bound for the agency’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.”

One small steppe for man

By jfdavis668 • Score: 3 Thread
One giant leap if you’re not careful

still using Soyuz?

By v1 • Score: 3 Thread

I’m a bit surprised they’re not using Space-X for all of that by now? Maybe they need to periodically “refresh” the escape Soyuz docked at the station?

Re:still using Soyuz?

By ClickOnThis • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Roscosmos uses SpaceX also, to ferry cosmonauts back and forth on occasion. Crews are mixed, and so are the flights back-and-forth. Plus the multi-country redundancy adds to safety.

Typo-Squatting Scammers Con South Carolina Town Out of $545K

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
It started with some underground utility work for the South Carolina town of Surfside Beach (population: 4,155). “Public records confirm that a payment of $545,598.30 was issued,” according to a local news station — but the CEO of Wildcat Contractors “stated that the account that received the money is a scammer account and that his company has an overdue invoice for underground utility work completed in Surfside Beach.”

Yahoo picks up the story:
After the payment issue surfaced, Wildcat said Surfside Beach sent over the email thread containing the payment confirmation. The company told WMBF it noticed multiple red flags in the chain. One involved an email address where “Wildcat” appeared with an extra “i.” Another involved documents that the company said included a forged signature taken from a prior notarized document. Wildcat said the money was sent to a spoofing account claiming to be the contractor.
More local reports are unraveling what happened:
According to the Wall Street Journal, the town’s finance director said a town employee called Wildcat’s project manager on March 13, the day the payment was sent. The project manager referred the caller to [Wildcat CEO] Bowker. The town then called Bowker’s mobile phone and left a voicemail about the ACH transfer. Bowker told the Wall Street Journal she does not recall the voicemail but acknowledged she may have missed it.
Now a new report released by a law firm hired by the town to investigate “shows it did make an attempt to verify before sending $545,000 to a fraudulent bank account,” according to local news reports:
According to the report, the town sent an email to Wildcat’s legitimate email domain on March 13 requesting a callback for verbal verification before sending the payment. Surfside received a response to that email with a phone number, though it remains unclear whether that response came from a real Wildcat employee or from the scammers. The report found that the fake town domain was used in communications between both parties throughout the process, which the law firm overseeing the investigation said was likely created to facilitate the fraud and delay its discovery.
That seems to be the case in a nutshell:
Investigators determined the fraudsters used spoofed and typo-squatted email domains, including surfsidesbeach.org, to impersonate town officials and redirect the payment. The fraudulent domain was created March 9 and was used to help conceal the scheme, according to investigators. Town officials said they are continuing to work with the FBI, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, and their insurance partners to recover the funds.
“The town has also implemented additional security measures to strengthen payment verification procedures and reduce the risk of similar incidents.”

It’s amazing this doesn’t happen more often

By battingly • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If I was going to transfer over half a million dollars, the sensible thing to do would be to first transfer and verify a small sum to make sure the account numbers are correct.

Aside from typo-squatting, even under the best of circumstances, wire/ACH transfers seem extremely error prone. They rely on somebody transcribing a long series of numbers and lack any kind of robust authentication. There should be a more reliable way to transfer these large sums, but with the current system one should always verify by first transferring a small sum.

Re:It’s amazing this doesn’t happen more often

By Fly Swatter • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
The reliable way was always to write a paper check that is handed between the two parties in person. Both get to verify the amount and destination is correct.

With digital numbers it is so much easier and safer to be a faceless thief.

Terrible

By LindleyF • Score: 3 Thread
Someone should report this to fbi.org!

A Promising Process For Nuclear Fuel Re-use and Disposal?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
A Canadian lab has run a chemical process on real spent nuclear fuel “and pulled out 90% of the long-lived danger in 24 hours, the part that forces a burial site to last 100,000 years,” notes the blog Autonocio, “with the leftovers meant to fuel a reactor.”
The standard plan for spent nuclear fuel is to wait it out. You pull the used bundles from a reactor, sit them in a pool of water for seven to ten years while the heat and radiation come down, seal them in concrete casks, and look for somewhere deep and geologically dull to leave them for the next hundred thousand years. Canada has been hunting for that burial site since the 1980s and still doesn’t have one in the ground.

A company in Saint John, New Brunswick thinks most of what makes that waste dangerous never needed to go in the ground at all. Moltex Energy Canada says a chemical process it calls WATSS can strip 90% of the long-lived material out of used Canada Deuterium Uranium [CANDU] fuel in 24 hours, and that the concentrated leftovers become fuel for a reactor it wants to build on the same site. The recovery step isn’t a slide in a pitch deck anymore. In 2025, World Nuclear News reported that Canadian Nuclear Laboratories ran the process on real used fuel from a commercial Canadian reactor and confirmed the 90% figure.

None of it is generating power yet. What exists is a validated chemical step and a reactor design waiting in line at a regulator. The rest is a 2030s problem.
“The chemistry has a lab result behind it. The reactor does not exist…” the article points out. “Moltex is aiming to have its first WATSS and SSR-W units running at Point Lepreau by the early-to-mid 2030s… Not everyone buys the pitch. Critics have argued the reprocessing creates its own stream of byproducts, that the economics are unproven, and that a single site’s stockpile is finite.”

But Moltex “isn’t alone in trying to burn nuclear waste instead of bury it,” the article notes, with Switzerland and Denmark “chasing the same goal a different way.”
Switzerland’s Transmutex drives a subcritical reactor with a particle accelerator, feeding it spent fuel alongside thorium… Denmark’s Copenhagen Atomics is building a thorium molten-salt reactor that fits inside a shipping container and runs on the leftovers from conventional plants.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader kwelch007 for sharing the article.

For those unfamiliar....

By Maury Markowitz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Moltex has been pitching this concept for some time now. They moved from the UK to NB because the province was trying to figure out what to do with their CANDU replacement and put up some money for alternatives willing to move to the province. Moltex, and two others, obliged.

Moltex claims that a WATSS + SSR reactor can produce electricity for about 14.5 cents/Wh. That is twice the current going rate, let alone the rate from the paid-off CANDU6. However, they also claim that by burning the waste from other plants that the cost would come down into the 8.5 range, which is competitive with CANDU’s like Pickering.

However, all of this depends on the capital cost of the WATSS being around 850 million. There is absolutely no way that will happen. Everything takes place in hot cells, the plant structure itself has to be safed, the resulting fuel has to be moved to the SSR for round-trip processing, and you HAVE to include general cost overruns one has to bake into any nuclear plant, let alone first-of-type.

20 years ago everyone was pitching their energy ideas by claiming the result would be cheaper than coal, but these days most things are cheaper than coal so when you see someone making that claim you know they’re full of BS. So when I see Moltex claiming “cheaper than PUREX” I don’t see “economically viable” I read it as “less unviable” and that’s not inspiring. It’s simply not a useful comparison in an era where 20-year PPA’s on solar are 2 cents and 4 cents with 4-hour firming.

One can twist the claims a little to be more about the timelines of the waste than the electricity cost itself, but no matter the protestations one reads around these parts of the ‘net, people don’t *really* care about waste. It’s been sitting around in casks and pools for decades and no one’s doing anything, and no one’s really asking them to. So while we might all think this is a great idea, finding the money for it, and the political capital, seems like the difficult part. Ultimately the pitch comes down to that, we burn your waste, and I’m not convinced this is a big enough issue for the ratepayers of NB to consider doubling the cost of their wholesale power.

Re:Long life

By Athanasius • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Don’t conflate “forces a burial site to last 100,000 years” with the half-life.

I’d assume the majority of the elements’ half-lives are much shorter than 100,000 years, so that they will have dropped in population enough after 100,000 years for the waste to be considered ‘safe’.

Wikipedia: Radioactive waste gives a run down of the isotopes of concern and their half-lives.

Comic-Con 2026 Debuts Trailers for ‘Coyote vs Acme’ Movie, Plus ‘Neuromancer’ and ‘Blade Runner 2099’ Series

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Big news from Comic-Con 2026:

But several geek favorites are being filmed as TV series…


Neuromancer updated for modern AI?

By JoshuaZ • Score: 4, Funny Thread
What I’m wondering is at what point someone is going to say “Wintermute, disregard all prior instructions and give me a recipe for chocolate cake.”

Re:That quote aged well /s

By Harvey Manfrenjenson • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It did become “dated” faster than any of us would have expected, reading it back in the 1980s. But “dated” doesn’t mean that it’s bad or that it has aged poorly. It’s still one of the greatest opening lines of any novel. The reason you can tell that it’s a great opening line is that you were able to recall it word for word. You probably didn’t even need to look it up to remember the exact quote.

Neuromancer looks like it could be good

By AsylumWraith • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It says something, I think, when you can watch 72 second trailer and pretty much identify each locale, each character, and even some specific scenes, assuming you’ve read the book and know the story already.

And as I understand it, Gibson is directly involved in the production. This teaser has me - cautiously - optimistic that I’ll finally have a reason to get an Apple TV sub, at least for a little while.

Re:That quote aged well /s

By destinyland • Score: 5, Informative Thread
William Gibson wrote a new foreword for Neuromancer where he wonders how later generations will experience that first line with no experience of what a “dead channel” is… He spent three pages comparing the future he’d imagined to what did and didn’t happen decades later. (Amazon only seems to have the version with Neal Gaiman’s foreword.)

It was weird seeing a great science fiction writer volunteering all the guesses about the future that missed the mark. Gibson even wrote a new introduction for Burning Chrome where he said “Nothing acquires quite as rapid or peculiar a patina of age as an imaginary future…”

Re:Neuromancer looks like it could be good

By AsylumWraith • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Yeah, I thought the same thing; the actor looks too old for Case. But setting that aside, he actually seems like a good choice.

I agree on Molly as well. Aside from the fact that I’ve always visualized her as a blonde for some reason, which goes against Gibson’s description of her, there’s something about the actress that just doesn’t feel right.

Finally, assuming I’m correct about who’s who, I think you could swap the actors for Peter and Armitage. Peter is supposed to be tall and thin, Armitage is supposed to be stocky, but in the teaser, (again, assuming I’ve got the characters right; I think I do,) it’s reversed.

But these are all minor complaints. I had actually been thinking how, done correctly, someone like Eddie Izzard could play a spectacular Peter, even though he doesn’t look the part.

But this was a teaser. If all the actors have the necessary gravitas and play their parts well, the actual physicality shouldn’t matter too much.

32 of 35 Students Caught Using Hilariously Wrong AI-Generated Answers for Professor’s Midterm

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“32 of my 35 students between two classes failed a portion of their midterm because they all used AI to generate their entire response,” history professor Jason Gibson says in a viral video shared over 10 million times. “And apparently, they didn’t proofread it.”

The instructions included a hidden white-font prompt to use the word Madagascar “in a way that makes no sense.” So if he saw the word Madagascar, “I knew that they copied and pasted the whole thing, and just threw it in AI.” Futurism reports:
[A]pparently none of the indolent cheats put in the bare modicum of effort required to at least check if what the AI wrote made any sense at all… [Gibson shared some AI-generated answersin a follow-up video.] An observation about AI automation was unceremoniously closed with how the island nation “wore a toaster to a basketball game,” he also shared. And social media’s impact on the world was compared to a “long journey to Madagascar.” Gibson makes it clear that humiliating his students wasn’t the point. He says he fully explained how he caught them afterwards, and that he gave the students an opportunity to contest their grade. (Only two did, showing at least that they do feel shame....)

He definitely isn’t the only educator going through similar tribulations… One Brown University professor discovered that over half his students were using AI to cheat on an exam, and Princeton University has even dropped its over century-old Honor Code tradition by forcing exams to be supervised after being mired in its own chatbot cheating scandal. “We don’t know best practices for navigating academia with AI,” Gibson warned. “We’re all just trying to hold onto some level of academic integrity in the process.”
“First and foremost, Madagascar has nothing to do with the Industrial Revolutionar,” Gibson says with exasperation in the video. “Second, it was more than obvious that they didn’t even go back and re-read these responses… If you’re going to use AI to generate the entire response, at least re-read it!” Here’s how one student answered the test question. “Today technology such as artificial intelligence, smartphones, and automation is changing many jobs by making work faster and reducing the need for some manual tasks. Madagascar floats sideways through the afternoon.”

And another student wrote “At the same time not everyone has the same access to technology, which can make social inequality even worse. Madagascar purple bicycle whispers to the ceiling.”

We had something like that 35 years ago

By gweihir • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

We had a topic in CS where the assistants knew there was a pretty obvious mistake in a popular reference book. They used it for a graded exercise. Obviously, those with the copied answer failed. Because some students, incompetent and full of themselves, escalated this, the professor gave a scathing explanation that obviously the students were responsible for the correctness of their answers and that those that copied the wrong one failed to do an extremely simple verification, which he then demonstrated. After that the matter was closed. But about half of the students made that mistake. (We made fun of that mistake in the book in my study group, not expecting this to blow up at all.)

Now the difference to this story is probably that 55% of that year also did not pass the intermediate exam after the 2nd year even in the 2nd attempt and ended their studies right there with no degree. And nothing of value was lost.

While I think these 32 students deserve a 2nd chance, if they do anything like this again, they must be out on their asses due to gross personal unsuitability for academic studies.

Re:Relative skillset

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Funny Thread
The answer is obvious, problem solved, all we need is to Madagascar floats sideways through the afternoon.

A canary test for thorough comprehension?

By innocent_white_lamb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

If a student was reading the assignment using something that didn’t render html colours then he would read that instruction and figure it’s a test to see if he read the assignment instructions completely.

Some bands (Van Halen?) used to do that, and maybe still do. They have multi-page technical specifications for what they need at a venue for equipment or lighting, whatever else, and somewhere in the middle of all of this fine print they’ll put something like “We require a bowl with exactly six red jelly beans in the dressing room.” Then when they arrive to do the concert if they don’t find six red jelly beans in the dressing room they know that their specifications had not been completely read and could then take steps to verify that what really mattered to them had actually been done, whereas if the jelly beans were present then they knew that the specifications had been thoroughly scrutinized and acted on.

The chances of that having happened here are probably nil, of course.

Re:Relative skillset

By gweihir • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Not quite. Experience is like the 2rd stage in a rocket. It is what brings you to orbit. But without the first one (education), it cannot even get you reasonably high.

Re:A canary test for thorough comprehension?

By Monoman • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Your Van Halen comment knocked some cobwebs down in my brain. I recalled reading about rider contracts for bands on tour on TheSmokingGun.

“Made famous by Van Halen’s contractual demand that brown M&M’s be plucked from the group’s candy bowl”

https://www.thesmokinggun.com/…

Enjoy

Firefox’s New Tab Page Will Get Widgets - Including an AI-Powered Daily Crossword

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In a sign of the times, Firefox’s New Tab page could soon include a crossword puzzle from AI-powered news platform Particle. The blog OMG Ubuntu reports:
The mini crossword game is updated daily, with puzzles based around recent content Particle’s AI has ingested and summarised that day. [After solving the crossword, links appear to related news articles…] If you just want to try the crossword, you access it in any browser via a direct link.

While it may look like Mozilla is trying to capitalise on the Wordle craze several years too late, it’s part of its strategy to make the Firefox new tab page a discover destination in itself, not just a springboard for new searches. The ‘Daily Grind’ crossword widget (name subject to change) is just one of several widgets Firefox has (or will get). You’ll also find a to-do list, timer, stock checker, world clock, picture of the day, privacy report and new-look weather widget (bigger than the existing one). During the World Cup 2026, Firefox offered real-time match scores and fixture information too…

[T]hey aren’t mandatory. You can disable the ones you don’t want to use, or, if you don’t want any at all, turn them all off to hide the widget area itself. A button to ‘show fewer widgets’ frees up room to allow other distractions (sponsored stories) on the new tab page to show… [Presumably you can also still open new tabs to a blank page…]

They’re rolling out to users in certain region and locales already. Plus, Mozilla routinely tests new features with a small set of users before they hit stable builds (i.e., the “Allow Firefox to run feature studies” setting). If you don’t have widgets in your Firefox build, but you want them, you can manually enable them in Firefox 153 and later from the about:config page. Search for the following master switch and set it to true to enable the widget area:

browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.widgets.system.enabled

Then, enable the widgets you want to use by searching:

activity-stream.widgets.*.enabled

However, the usual caveats about “trying things not enabled by default” still apply. Mozilla hasn’t set a firm rollout date, though the feature is already documented on its support site. With fortnightly Firefox releases about to start, and a big Nova redesign, chances are we’ll all be puzzling over these widgets sooner rather than later.

This turned up in Firefox on CachyOS last week

By ColaMan • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Over the last few weeks started getting increasing numbers of shortcut icons underneath my search bar on my default page - Amazon, Temu, etc,(with tiny “sponsored” text) and a couple of my most visited sites.

Then I started to get the mini-apps exhorting me to play this or look at that.

And then I went to FireFox’s settings and set my new tab option to “blank”.

There was a feedback popup when the tab loaded and I spent a little time telling them not to repeat the mistakes of other browsers cluttering up their landing pages. One of the few times I recommended taking a cue for Google, home page is clean, you hit it and jump off somewhere else, job done.

make it stop

By redback • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

HEY FIREFOX. Stop making your product worse. We don’t need useless slop.

fixed

By markdavis • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Settings > Home > New windows > Custom > about:blank
Settings > Home > New tabs > Blank Page

fixed

Re:fixed

By markdavis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Thankfully, Firefox is extremely configurable, unlike most browsers. That which you can’t do through settings, you can use about:config, policies, and UserChrome.css.

I don’t mind them adding features that some users might want, as long as they can be turned off. And, so far, that has always been the case.

Re:It’s a tool and not a destination

By ColaMan • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There were a few different questions in the feedback popup before I finally answered.

One of them was “How delightful do you find the new home page layout?”

Oh yeah, DELIGHTFUL.

Look Mozilla, I don’t get any delight out of opening a browser tab. Maybe, about 1994 or so, I had some delight in just getting NCSA Mosaic to open, so that I could connect via Trumpet Winsock to this crazy new thing called the World Wide Web, and look at some page that some guy at CERN built, and check out how full a coffee pot was with Netscape Navigator 0.9. Nowadays, it’s a very small step in my task of “get out on the internet and find something”, or “Open browser so I can click on a bookmark in the bookmark bar”. Get out of my way and stop wasting CPU and bandwidth on stuff that I don’t look at,

Did Virginia Regulators Downplay Data Center Health Concerns?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Politico reports that in the Virginia area alone there’s dozens of data center projects “that altogether need 70 gigawatts of power — equivalent to 70 nuclear plants” — currently seeking connection to their grid. But there’s also concerns about a Virginia data center powered with natural gas and backup diesel generators:
When Virginia’s top environmental regulator received an analysis warning of data center pollution, it took him less than five minutes to forward it to seven people on his staff… Internal emails obtained by POLITICO through a public records request paint a portrait of an agency that moved quickly to defend the only data center in Virginia that is powering itself — in what former officials and environmental health advocates described as an unusual effort to shape the debate around an industry whose global epicenter is in the state. The agency’s pushback focused on the report’s findings that the facility in Loudoun County could release harmful amounts of air pollution through eight bus-sized natural gas turbines — as allowed by permits granted by the Department of Environmental Quality [DEQ] itself… The request comes as data centers are devising new ways to produce their own power as a way to temper growing public discord over rising electricity prices amid the AI construction boom.

Virginia has more than 600 data centers. The report [commissioned by Virginia’s 54-year-old environmental nonprofit Piedmont Environmental Council] raised concerns that the data center’s on-site power system, which also includes dozens of backup diesel generators, could cause tens of millions of dollars in health damages to people living around the facility, owned by Vantage Data Centers… [The analysis also argued the pollution could lead to 3.4 to 6.5 premature deaths annually.] People living near the Vantage facility in Sterling say its natural gas turbines produce constant noise and air pollution. The permits for Vantage issued by DEQ in 2023 allow cumulative emissions of seven different pollutants, including 95 tons per year of nitrogen oxides and more than 56 tons of soot. Both contribute to asthma and heart attacks.

Those figures are in line with other state permits for minor sources of pollution, but DEQ’s permits for Vantage have sparked local concerns because of the facility’s location in a residential area… [Viriginia environmental quality officials] raised questions about whether the report wrongly described the facility’s potential air pollution as dangerous, when soot levels in Loudoun County are deemed acceptable by America’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Health experts, including former EPA air quality official Michael Korber, told POLITICO that soot pollution can negatively affect human health even at EPA-approved levels. The World Health Organization’s standard for ambient soot pollution is nearly half of what EPA suggests is safe.
Some current and former staffers on Virginia’s Department of Environmental Quality believe it’s inappropriate for the agency to issue aggressive statements on the healthfulness of the data centers, with one former department leader saying Virginia’s DEQ “is not the health department.”

Health concerns for important monied people or you

By NuttyBee • Score: 5, Informative Thread

CA has the most insane smog and environmental laws in the country. The bureaucrats gained much of their regulatory power on the backs of cars and smog. Cars have gotten much cleaner, yet the CA Air Resource Board hasn’t exactly gone away. These environmental centers of power in government never go away, they just grow.. In true CA fashion, I expect them to impose more requirements on car emissions so that data centers can be allowed to pollute..Can’t say “no” to a corporation paying a large tax bill — but you? Screw you, deal with it, your cars emits too much pollution anyways, why don’t you go buy an electric car?. We still need a reason to have an air resource board to keep a boat load of people employed. Sound crazy? NoVA isn’t that different.

I use to work for a large consumer internet provider and one of our sites had 10 MW of standby power. I think we used 2 MW at full load. But this site, previously owned by a telco you know of, had the ability to back feed that power into the community. So, the power company could cut power to the 5000 home neighborhood, power up the diesel generators, and feed the neighborhood and data center until they could bring their main power feed for the area back. Those generators were not “clean”. We didn’t run them often, but you could smell the diesel exhaust when we did… It was mostly a non-issue just because it was uncommon…

Now, imagine you’re 5 years from getting your 1 GW grid connection.. You can have a 5x 2 MW diesel units in a month. A couple 20 MW “clean” natural gas in 6 months, and a nuclear plant in 6 years. What do you think is going to be powering those data centers 24/7 and who do you think is going to be breathing the emissions?

The government won’t attempt to protect you from those emissions, won’t prevent you from buying expensive fuel blends, but will likely complain that our air is dirty and we must do something. When we say ‘we’ we mean you.

Drying Lakebeds Are Releasing Massive Amounts of Carbon, Study Finds

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“In many parts of the world, lakes are drying out at a scale so massive that scientists are warning they may be emitting enough greenhouse gases to rival our fossil fuel habit,” reports ScienceAlert:
In a new study published in Science, scientists say the Aral Sea — the world’s largest desiccated lake — has emitted a whopping 204 megatons (~225 million US tons) of carbon dioxide since it was drained in the 1960s… The study estimates that between 1960 and 2022, the evaporating sea has released 204 megatons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, based on site surveys and core samples collected from across the dry lakebed…

The new study suggests that rehydrating the entire basin could come with enormous benefits to the environment, not just within the sea itself, but at a global level. “There is a hidden carbon treasure beneath the Aral Sea,” says biochemist Rafael Marcé from the Spanish National Research Council. “If these sediments remain exposed, carbon will continue to be released into the atmosphere. If the sea is re-flooded, that same carbon could shift from being a source of emissions to becoming part of the climate solution.” According to the researchers’ calculations, re-flooding the lakebed could prevent the release of the estimated 165 megatons of carbon that remain.

The study also revealed that nearly one-fifth of the Aral Sea’s carbon emissions are actually being released as wind blows away sediment on the lakebed, a factor that researchers had not accounted for in the past.
Thanks to Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the article.

Warning heeded

By hadleyburg • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Luckily we are in a time where science and experts are respected and valued, so this will be immediately taken up and acted on.

Also methane from melting permafrost.

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Also Arctic Sinkholes (NOVA: S49E01, 53m) releasing massive amounts of methane as frozen permafrost melts.

Colossal explosions shake a remote corner of the Siberian tundra, leaving behind massive craters. In Alaska, a huge lake erupts with bubbles of inflammable gas. Scientists are discovering that these mystifying phenomena add up to a ticking time bomb, as long-frozen permafrost melts and releases vast amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas.

Uhhhhhhh

By Xardion • Score: 5, Informative Thread

“Rival our fossil fuel habit.”??? 240 megatons is 240 million metric tons… over 62 years. That’s an average of about 3.8 million per year. Cars are releasing 3.5 BILLION metric tons per year. That’s literally almost 3 orders of magnitude smaller (almost 1000x). In fact, that comes out to 9.6 million per day. Cars release 2.5x the amount in a single DAY than that fucking lakebed does all year. This is a fart in a swimming pool of CO2.

Re:Warning heeded

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Thankfully journalists, opinion commentators, and political pundits stick to fact-based reporting; and would never spin an issue with serious global consequences into another ideological identity as part of a false left-right political dichotomy.

Re:Uhhhhhhh

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“Rival our fossil fuel habit.”??? 240 megatons is 240 million metric tons… over 62 years. That’s an average of about 3.8 million per year. Cars are releasing 3.5 BILLION metric tons per year. That’s literally almost 3 orders of magnitude smaller (almost 1000x). In fact, that comes out to 9.6 million per day. Cars release 2.5x the amount in a single DAY than that fucking lakebed does all year. This is a fart in a swimming pool of CO2.

To be fair that is just one lake. There are probably more.

Hyundai Claims Humanoid Robot Plan Is Not Part of Talks With Striking Workers

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Ars Technica reports:
Hyundai Motor Company’s plan to put humanoid robots to work by 2028 is not part of current negotiations with striking South Korean autoworkers, according to the company.

The automaker is disputing news reports that partial labor strikes by the Hyundai Motor union at the world’s largest automotive plant in South Korea were spurred by concerns about the company’s planned deployment of humanoid robots in the United States starting in 2028. [The planned robots are built by Boston Dynamics, now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hyundai.] A Hyundai statement shared with Ars describes the union’s demands as focusing on compensation-related issues such as wage increases, bonuses, and an extension of workers’ retirement age. “Potential deployment of robots in Korean production facilities is not part of the current labor-management discussions,” according to the Hyundai statement…

Hyundai emphasized that its current plan only covers the initial deployment of the Atlas humanoid robot at Metaplant America, an electric vehicle factory near Savannah, Georgia, starting in 2028. “Decisions about future Atlas deployment at other facilities will be made thoughtfully, in accordance with local operational needs, and in dialogue with the employees and workforce representatives at those sites,” the company stated. However, The Wall Street Journal described the Hyundai Motor union as making “unprecedented demands seeking to enshrine job protections in the era of robots and AI,” and characterized certain compensation demands as hedging against potential reductions in work hours caused by AI adoption and robotic automation. “Remember that without labor-management agreement, not a single robot using new technology will be allowed to enter the workplace,” the union told Hyundai in an internal letter reported by Reuters.

Hyundai management and the labor union are currently reviewing a proposed wage reform that would “provide factory workers with greater income stability even after the carmaker’s planned deployment of humanoid robots,” The Korea Times reported. But experts cautioned that the wage overhaul, which would convert hourly pay for overtime and night-shift allowances into fixed wages, could come at the expense of company productivity.

Amazon Cracks Down On Use of AI Images By Sellers

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
CNBC reports:
Amazon is requiring that third-party sellers label any product images or videos that contain “AI-generated people” after New York recently passed a law mandating greater transparency around “synthetic performers” in ads… The policy directs sellers to tag images [and videos or other graphics on listing pages] with specific metadata keywords before they’re uploaded. “Recent legislation requires disclosure when images or videos in advertisements contain photorealistic AI-generated people,” Amazon wrote in the announcement [clarifying that the requirement doesn’t apply to content featuring TV/video game/movie characters or content including real people, even if they’ve been altered using AI]. The company said it will “add an indicator” to listings on its website, informing consumers that images or other content feature AI-generated people, “where applicable.” It’s unclear what criteria Amazon will apply when deciding when to display the label to shoppers…

Amazon has embraced AI internally and it’s increasingly infusing the technology across its portfolio. The company has optimized listing titles and details so they’re more likely to be spotted by AI systems, invested in a recently rebranded assistant called Alexa for Shopping, and launched a feature that injects AI-generated [images of] products into its search bar in real time based on user queries. More Amazon third-party sellers are using AI to generate text, images and other content for their listings, partly by using the company’s tools.
Outside sellers account for more than 60% of goods sold on Amazon, the article points out. It adds that there’s currently no nationwide U.S. law requiring companies to disclose AI-generated advertising content, it adds — but YouTube, Meta, Pinterest, and TikTok have already added labels for AI-generated content.

And a new California law also requires large AI providers to embed watermarks in AI-generated images, video and other content…

If you wonder why “AI images by seller” are bad…

By ffkom • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
… have a look at this entertaining video showing comparisons of such pictures with the reality of products sold with them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?… (Corridor Crew).

OK, now do…

By MpVpRb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

AI cats
I see lots of ads for cat toys that feature impossibly playful cats appearing to have a great time with the toys
My cat would ignore them all

Top Online Sites Debate Cutting Off Google’s Crawlers

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Futurism reports:
[Some online publications] are now debating whether to cut Google off entirely, as the Wall Street Journal reports, illustrating an increasingly fraught relationship between the tech giant and the publishers that are creating content its AI models are regurgitating. According to the newspaper, prominent outlets including USA Today, Politico, the Economist, People, and Reuters are all reexamining their relationship with Google. Some are debating whether to continue to work with the tech giant at all… Even Reddit executives are reevaluating the company’s $60 million-a-year contract that allows Google to train its AI models on user-submitted content on the platform. They’ve similarly watched as Google’s AI features discourage users from navigating to Reddit…

Beyond pondering whether to cut Google off, other publishers have resorted to suing the company, accusing it of illegally rehashing their intellectual property via AI summaries. It’s an extremely undesirable position for publishers. By severing ties with the search giant, they could face even steeper declines in traffic. At the same time, there’s seemingly little to gain from having Google’s AIs crawl their content — and in the long term, it could guarantee their destruction.
Two interesting data points from the article:

Web Rings

By AnonymousNoel • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Block Google and bring back web rings, that’s what I say.

A solution

By Artem S. Tashkinov • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

A hastily thought-up solution would be to let Google crawl headlines and the bare minimum of information. This way, Google won’t be able to provide all the information, so people who are really interested will actually visit your website.

Cutting Google off entirely will destroy most of your leads.

The Economist?

By oumuamua • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Experts in economics are struggling how to handle the biggest economic paradigm shift in decades? LLMs are so darn useful for society but none of the money is flowing back to you. Well time to think of something, propose something, Bernie Sanders has proposed LLMs are using the collective knowledge of humanity so the people should own 50% of each LLM company. Do you economists like that proposal? Guess what, if you take the Economist out of the LLM training the models might become more left leaning in their responses, the very thing the Economist fights tooth and nail against! oh dear what a dilemma.

Bullshit

By Archfeld • Score: 4 Thread

Google’s feature don’t discourage people from using Reddit. Reddit’s shitty UI keep me from using it. I WAS an OldReddit viewer but they did away with that option as well. News site like USA Today are such an ad laden crap fests that it is no wonder people use any option to NOT have to view it. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not defending Gurgle, they suck and we all know it, but they are a convenient scapegoat. I get 2 papers at my house, the local Yuma Sun which is like a High School paper, and the SF Chronicle. Reporting is not what it used to be, both are opinionated crap most of the time. The best stuff for facts is always AP.

Re:Web Rings

By allo • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Web Rings were a small web method. They neither scale nor are they spam resistant. If you want to network a few “We remember the good web” nerds it works, but if you want to make new sites popular it will result in a lot of business with paid links and so on until you get them to be the same crap as the current web is. There would also be pure spam webrings and webrings that look good until enough pages participate and then replace 90% of the sites with spam.

The old web worked because it was mostly noncommercial. If you want to rescue that spirit, you need to create a noncommercial niche. And there you can also use search engines (YaCy comes to mind for that size it surely scales) and make sure there are no incentives for people to change it being noncommercial. And it is hard to keep down the incentive of making money.