Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Plex Triples Lifetime Subscription Cost To $750
  2. Google Changes Its Search Box for the First Time in 25 Years
  3. NextEra and Dominion’s $67 Billion Mega-Merger Is All About the Data Centers
  4. OpenAI Co-Founder Andrej Karpathy Joins Anthropic
  5. StanChart To Cut Over 7,000 Jobs, Boost AI To Replace ‘Lower-Value Human Capital’
  6. CISA Admin Leaked AWS GovCloud Keys On Github
  7. Microsoft Launches Surface Pro 12, Surface Laptop 8 With Intel Chips
  8. Microsoft Surprises With Its First Server Linux Distribution: Azure Linux 4.0
  9. Before Mass Layoffs, Meta Reassigns 7,000 Workers To Focus On AI
  10. Amazon’s Alexa+ Now Produces AI-Generated Podcasts
  11. Europe Tests Laser Links As Satellite Comms Outgrow Radio
  12. PlayStation Exclusives Aren’t Coming To PC Anymore
  13. FBI Wants to Buy Nationwide Access to License Plate Readers
  14. New Windows ‘MiniPlasma’ Zero-Day Exploit Gives SYSTEM Access, PoC Released
  15. Nintendo Tries To Obtain Touchscreen-Specific Patent On Monster Capturing

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Plex Triples Lifetime Subscription Cost To $750

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli shares a report from NERDS.xyz:
Plex is raising the price of a new Lifetime Plex Pass from $249.99 to $749.99 on July 1. That’s a $500 increase for media server software. Plex says it needs the money for “long-term development” and future features, but a lot of self-hosting folks are already wondering if this is basically a soft way of killing the Lifetime option without officially removing it. At nearly $750, are people just going to move to Jellyfin instead?
As for those future improvements, Plex said the roadmap includes better downloads support, restored music and photo library support in mobile apps, NFO metadata support, IPv6 support, playlist editing on mobile, audio enhancements, and transcoding improvements.

Plex’s business model

By systemd-anonymousd • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’ve never understood Plex. People pay a third party service for the right to access their own self-hosted server filled with pirated content? And hand their identity over to Plex while doing so?

Jellyfin

By wgoodman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

As soon as Plex started pushing it as a social media platform I jumped ship. Jellyfin is hilariously superior.

Exactly 10x

By tttonyyy • Score: 5, Informative Thread

…what I paid for it a decade ago.

It still does the things I wanted it for then, but I can’t say I’ve really used any of the new features added over the last decade, which if anything pushed “just stream my media” to the background.

$750 to boost revenue and sell

By sziring • Score: 3 Thread

$750 per sucker = larger bottom line. Larger revenue = sale to larger fish. Larger fish = broken contract and $750 really means one year subscription (force migration to new platform).

HMU

By sizzlinkitty • Score: 3 Thread

I haven’t used my plex lifetime license in over 2 years and I have several friends that have moved away from their plex lifetime licenses. Would there be a resell market allowing us to sell these lifetime licenses on to someone else?

Google Changes Its Search Box for the First Time in 25 Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Google is giving its iconic search box its first major redesign since 2001. The new design incorporates, you guessed it, artificial intelligence, “getting bigger and more interactive so that people can ask even longer questions and upload photographs and videos into queries,” reports the New York Times. “In addition, people can ask follow-up questions with a chatbot on Google’s main search page.” From the report:
The company will also offer digital assistants, known as agents, to automate searches so that someone who may be apartment hunting can be notified of a new listing without opening a real estate site like Zillow. The search features will be powered by a new artificial intelligence model, Gemini 3.5 Flash. Google said the model had improved on creating software code and performing autonomous tasks, worked faster and was less expensive to run than comparable models.

[…] Google is also bringing one of A.I.‘s biggest breakthroughs — software coding — to search. When people research complex topics like astrophysics, Gemini can build interactive graphics and simulations behind the scenes to provide a deeper answer than its previous listing of websites. Google said it was introducing an alternative to the agents powered by Anthropic’s Claude Code and OpenAI’s Codex. Called Gemini Spark, the service is embedded in Gmail, Docs and other Google products, where it can turn meeting notes spread across emails and chats into a single document. It can also read and draft emails.
“The open web is on its way out,” says Richard Kramer, a financial analyst with Arete Research. “With A.I., Google is reducing everyone to raw data providers.”

Search box is now the Slop Box

By TheWho79 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
They keep calling it a “Search box” in the reporting. I think it is now the “Slop Box”.

How to pump up your AI monies:

By SeaFox • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Step 1: Add your AI to your popular search product.
Step 2: Take away the ability to search without using the AI.
Step 3: Tell all your investors “Look how much people are using our AI! They must love it!”

Income stream?

By ukoda • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I’m told it real cost money to use in terms of power consumption etc which is usually restricted unless you subscribe for more tokens. So if they are going to waste resources for every search I do what’s the game plan to cover the extra cost they are forcing on a routine search?

- More adverts?
- Warnings you are reaching you 80% search limits and link to pay for more searches?
- Something else I didn’t want and didn’t sign up for?

I see no good end game for this ‘improvement’.

Re:All the big tech companies…

By XXongo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Are you a rsilvergun sock puppet or something? If you don’t want AI search, just don’t click on it.

It’s getting damn near impossible to “just don’t click on” AI; it’s being stuck everywhere, whether we want it ot not. When I do a search, I want the search results, not a goddamn AI telling me what to think.

(Google searches keep getting worse. Now, likely as not, I get sites that don’t contain your search term. Yes, even when I put the important terms in quotation marks.)

I’m kind of okay with it and use AI mode a lot

By caseih • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Google search has been really poor for quite some time. Between SEO rubbish and just the general lack of context in conventional searches, at least half the time search fails to give me relevant results. Also conventional search lacks the ability to fine tune the search with added context. AI Mode may not succeed the first time, but I can add context to my search query, and steer the AI towards the relevant content (including telling it that it hallucinated). It works for me better than the old search. It’s not perfect and can fall down spectacularly. For example you asked AI about configuring something specific on your WiFi router of a particular make and model, it assumes that any and all WiFi router information applies when it clearly does not.

TLDR: conventional search is dead and has been for a long time. AI search actually does work, at least for me.

NextEra and Dominion’s $67 Billion Mega-Merger Is All About the Data Centers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Inside Climate News:
A proposed merger of the largest utility in the country by market value, NextEra Energy, with the sixth-largest, Dominion, would create a megacompany at a time when data centers and rapid increases in electricity demand are reshaping the industry. The proposal, announced Monday morning and contingent on state and federal regulatory approval, would result in a company that leads in nearly every aspect of the US power and utility industry, including overall electricity generation, natural gas generation, and renewables. The $67 billion deal combines NextEra’s size and reach with Dominion’s positioning as the local utility for the world’s largest concentration of data centers in northern Virginia. But the results are likely bad for consumers and the environment, creating a company with enormous financial and political strength that will be difficult to effectively regulate, according to consumer advocates and analysts.

For perspective, only Exxon Mobil and Chevron would be larger based on market value among US-based energy companies. “Mergers are not about consumers; they’re about shareholders,” said Ari Peskoe, director of the Electricity Law Initiative at Harvard Law School. “For the Dominion shareholders, they are selling their shares at a premium. The executives are getting massive payouts for facilitating this, assuming it all goes through, and obviously NextEra believes the transaction is going to add value to the company. Ratepayers are all an afterthought.” The deal makes financial sense for both companies, said Andrew Bischof, an equity analyst for Morningstar. “We view the transaction as allowing NextEra to accelerate its data center ambitions, which had trailed those of its regulated peers, by using Dominion’s expertise and relationships to expedite NextEra’s data center hub plans,” he said in a note to clients.

NextEra, based in Juno Beach, Florida, includes Florida Power & Light, the largest regulated electricity utility in the state, and NextEra Energy Resources, a wholesale electricity supplier that owns power plants across the nation. Dominion, based in Richmond, Virginia, includes regulated utilities serving much of Virginia, parts of North Carolina and South Carolina, and other assets across the country. The company would be called NextEra Energy, and NextEra CEO John W. Ketchum would serve in the same role after the deal closes. Robert M. Blue, Dominion’s CEO, would be the CEO for regulated utilities for the merged company. The parties said they expect regulatory approvals to take 12 to 18 months. NextEra shareholders would own 74.5 percent and Dominion shareholders would own 25.5 percent, respectively, of the combined company in the all-stock transaction.
“We are bringing NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy together because scale matters more than ever — not for the sake of size, but because scale translates into capital and operating efficiencies,” Ketchum said in a statement.
Although the companies claim the deal would produce savings, including $2.25 billion in Dominion customer bill credits, former regulator Marissa Paslick Gillett said she was “flabbergasted by the tone deafness,” arguing that major utility mergers rarely deliver the promised “synergies” and often create “a behemoth” that is harder to regulate.

Others warned that a larger NextEra could use its political power “to the disadvantage of ratepayers,” while climate advocates said expanding methane gas plants to serve data centers would worsen pollution and leave vulnerable communities “at the short end of the stick.”

OpenAI Co-Founder Andrej Karpathy Joins Anthropic

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy has joined rival AI lab Anthropic. “The hire is a major coup for Anthropic in the high-stakes competition for elite AI talent — and another sign the company is emerging as a magnet for some of the industry’s most respected technical minds,” reports Axios. From the report:
Karpathy will start this week on Anthropic’s pre-training team, which is responsible for the massive training runs that give Claude its core knowledge and capabilities, according to Anthropic. Karpathy will help launch a new team focused on using Claude itself to accelerate pretraining research — an increasingly important frontier as AI companies race to automate parts of AI development. “I think the next few years at the frontier of LLMs will be especially formative. I am very excited to join the team here and get back to R&D,” Karpathy said in a post on X.

Karpathy is a rare AI figure with credibility across research, industry and education. He was a founding member of OpenAI before serving as Tesla’s director of AI, where he led the computer vision team behind Autopilot. Karpathy coined the term “vibe coding" and recently described himself as being in a “state of AI psychosis” since December — embracing “tokenmaxxing” and aggressively stress-testing frontier models.

StanChart To Cut Over 7,000 Jobs, Boost AI To Replace ‘Lower-Value Human Capital’

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The London-headquartered lender Standard Chartered announced plans to cut more than 7,000 jobs by 2030, with CEO Bill Winters saying the bank will replace some “lower-value human capital” through automation and AI while offering retraining to affected workers. “It’s not cost-cutting. It’s replacing in some cases lower-value human capital with the financial capital and the investment capital we’re putting in,” CEO Bill Winters told reporters. “So, the people that want to reskill, that want to carry on, we’re giving every opportunity to reposition,” Winters said. Reuters reports:
The cuts, alongside higher shareholder return targets announced in a strategy update, come as StanChart is at the tail-end of a decade-long effort to transform itself from a potential takeover target to a steadily profitable lender. Its London-listed shares, which have risen 65% in the last 12 months, fell 0.5% in early trading, as analysts said the new targets were at the conservative end of their expectations.

“In a world full of uncertainty, performance may prove more challenging further out,” said Ed Firth, analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, citing how the bank has benefited in recent years from high interest rates and huge wealth flows. StanChart’s move to streamline operations and rein in costs comes as more global firms slash jobs by deploying AI to improve efficiency. Japanese lender Mizuho in March unveiled up to 5,000 job cuts over a decade. And banks globally are scrambling to integrate frontier AI models and fend off rising cyber threats.

The most affected roles will be in the bank’s back-office centres, including those in Chennai, Bengaluru, Kuala Lumpur and Warsaw, according to Winters. “Of course we’re using AI along the way and AI will be a huge facilitator and enabler of that,” he added, referring to its ongoing revamp to automate more of its core banking system. StanChart said it would deliver over 15% return on tangible equity in 2028, more than three percentage points higher than in 2025, and building to about 18% in 2030.
Meta also announced plans to reassign 7,000 employees into AI-related initiatives, just ahead of layoffs expected to affect roughly 8,000 workers.

Human Capital

By Puls4r • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
No joke - our large company now uses a “Human Capital Management” system for things like pay. I can’t believe they didn’t understand how demeaning that is. More likely they just don’t care.

“Low -value human capital”

By greytree • Score: 3 Thread
Did they put that on the job ads when they hired these people ?

“Lower Value Human Capital” …

By Qbertino • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

… Did they really phrase it that way? If so, that would be the most *sshole move I’ve seen by corporate douchebags in a long time. And if so I can’t wait for the bots to replace those folks too.

Re:“Lower Value Human Capital” …

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
WSJ, Guardian, and Reuters are reporting that as a direct quote from Hong Kong media event, which makes sense because they have an investor summit happening now And that summit has some other whoopers like “Our target is a skills-based operating model for an AI-first bank”, “15% Reduction in human effort through engineering support bots”, and “85k Staff trained and actively using MS CoPilot to realise value”

“Lower-value human capital”

By Gleenie • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Well there’s some psychopathic phrasing right there…

CISA Admin Leaked AWS GovCloud Keys On Github

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from KrebsOnSecurity:
Until this past weekend, a contractor for the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) maintained a public GitHub repository that exposed credentials to several highly privileged AWS GovCloud accounts and a large number of internal CISA systems. Security experts said the public archive included files detailing how CISA builds, tests and deploys software internally, and that it represents one of the most egregious government data leaks in recent history. On May 15, KrebsOnSecurity heard from Guillaume Valadon, a researcher with the security firm GitGuardian. Valadon’s company constantly scans public code repositories at GitHub and elsewhere for exposed secrets, automatically alerting the offending accounts of any apparent sensitive data exposures. Valadon said he reached out because the owner in this case wasn’t responding and the information exposed was highly sensitive.

The GitHub repository that Valadon flagged was named “Private-CISA,” and it harbored a vast number of internal CISA/DHS credentials and files, including cloud keys, tokens, plaintext passwords, logs and other sensitive CISA assets. Valadon said the exposed CISA credentials represent a textbook example of poor security hygiene, noting that the commit logs in the offending GitHub account show that the CISA administrator disabled the default setting in GitHub that blocks users from publishing SSH keys or other secrets in public code repositories. “Passwords stored in plain text in a csv, backups in git, explicit commands to disable GitHub secrets detection feature,” Valadon wrote in an email. “I honestly believed that it was all fake before analyzing the content deeper. This is indeed the worst leak that I’ve witnessed in my career. It is obviously an individual’s mistake, but I believe that it might reveal internal practices.”
“Currently, there is no indication that any sensitive data was compromised as a result of this incident,” a CISA spokesperson wrote. “While we hold our team members to the highest standards of integrity and operational awareness, we are working to ensure additional safeguards are implemented to prevent future occurrences.”
The GitHub account in question was taken offline shortly after CISA was notified about the exposure. However, according to Caturegli, the exposed AWS keys remained valid for another 48 hours.

“What I suspect happened is [the CISA contractor] was using this GitHub to synchronize files between a work laptop and a home computer, because he has regularly committed to this repo since November 2025,” Caturegli said. “This would be an embarrassing leak for any company, but it’s even more so in this case because it’s CISA.”

Seriously

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Funny Thread

How could Joe Biden allow this to happen?

Re:Interesting

By DarkOx • Score: 4, Informative Thread

maybe partly, but the reality I know as someone who reads a lot of penetration testing reports, is big supposedly mature organizations end up putting useful credentials (as in not just some QA mock enviornment nobody cares about in CI/CD stuff) in their git commits, all the freaking time.

Cloud security is a s*** show a lot of places, even places with mostly capable people, it only takes one idiot or one careless person to really mess things up badly. That is the problem with PaaS/SaaS model generally.

Shameful

By Himmy32 • Score: 4, Informative Thread
Just wildly shameful for the organization that’s supposed to be writing the book on best practices to allow something so bad. But as the story goes, can’t shame the shameless.

And this is why…

By YuppieScum • Score: 5, Informative Thread

…we laugh when a Government says “We must have backdoor access to everyone’s cryptography, it will be perfectly safe with us.”

Re:Seriously

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I’m honestly surprised that the CISA spokeswoman didn’t include a non-sequitir like “we are re-building a world class workforce after the DEI-driven destruction caused by Biden’s administration” nor a statement praising Donald Trump. Typically at least one of the two is included in any deflection offered by the current administraiton.

Microsoft Launches Surface Pro 12, Surface Laptop 8 With Intel Chips

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is launching three new Intel-powered Surface devices for businesses: the Surface Pro 12, Surface Laptop 8, and a smaller 13-inch Surface Laptop model. These new machines come equipped with newer Intel chips, a few business-focused upgrades, and notably higher starting prices. “The high pricing of these three new Surface devices is a sign of things to come for whatever consumer models Microsoft is planning this year,” notes The Verge. From the report:
This time around Microsoft is refreshing its Surface Pro and Surface Laptop models with Intel’s latest Core Ultra Series 3 processors first, ahead of similar models with Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon X2 processors later this year. The new Surface Pro 12, or as Microsoft calls it the Surface Pro for Business 13-inch (12th Edition), will be available for businesses today, starting at an eye-watering $1,949.99. The base model will include an Intel Core Ultra 5 processor, 16GB of RAM, 256GB of storage, and the regular 13-inch PixelSense LCD display.

Businesses will have to pay extra for models with Intel’s Core Ultra 7 processor, up to 64GB of RAM, and up to 1TB of storage. The top spec Surface Pro 12 with a Core Ultra 7, 64GB of RAM, and 1TB of storage will be priced at $4,399.99, and there are also OLED screen options and models with 5G connectivity. The Surface Pro 12 5G starts at $2,249.99, with a Core Ultra 5, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. […] Microsoft is also launching two new versions of the Surface Laptop for businesses today. The Surface Laptop 8, or Surface Laptop for Business 13.8 or 15-inch (8th Edition) as Microsoft calls it, will also be available with a range of Intel’s Core Ultra Series 3 chips. It launches alongside a smaller 13-inch model, which is confusingly labeled the Surface Laptop for Business 13-inch (1st Edition).

The 13.8-inch model starts at $1,949.99, and includes Intel’s Core Ultra 5 processor, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. While Surface devices for businesses have typically had higher pricing than consumer models, the $1,949.99 starting price for a Surface Laptop 8 is almost double the original price of the Surface Laptop 7. RAMageddon really has come for Microsoft’s Surface Pro and Surface Laptop devices, after recent price increases meant the existing consumer models are now $500 more expensive than their original starting price. The max configuration for the 13.8-inch Surface Pro 8 will include a Core Ultra 7, 64GB of RAM, and 1TB of storage for $4,299.99. A similar version of the 15-inch model (with an x7 processor) will be priced at $4,499.99.

Or… a 16” Macbook Pro M5 Max

By Sethra • Score: 3 Thread

A fully loaded Surface Pro 12 is a pale imitation of the power of a similarly priced Macbook Pro.

Re:Or… a 16” Macbook Pro M5 Max

By Powercntrl • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Apple doesn’t actually have a product that directly competes against the Surface Pro tablets. Despite some of the recent improvements, iPad OS is still quite limiting. That being said, some people do manage to perform “real” work on iPads, if everything you’re trying to do is compatible with Apple’s ecosystem.

Microsoft Surprises With Its First Server Linux Distribution: Azure Linux 4.0

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is turning Azure Linux into a general-purpose, Fedora-based cloud distribution available to all Azure customers, while also productizing Flatcar as Azure Container Linux for immutable container hosts. “When Microsoft joined the Linux Foundation, there was this big conspiracy theory that somehow the Linux Foundation was undermining open source in partnership with Microsoft, and now you announce that you’re shipping a Linux distribution,” Jim Zemlin, the Linux Foundation’s CEO, said in response to Microsoft’s surprise announcement. “That’s amazing.” ZDNet reports:
Until now, [Lachlan Everson, Microsoft’s Principal Program Manager on Azure’s open-source team] noted, “we had Azure Linux only available to third-party customers through AKS specifically, and that was Azure Linux 3.0.” Going forward, this will be ACL. Everson emphasized that Azure Linux 4.0 is the culmination of years of internal usage and the evolution of the earlier Mariner distribution. “So we’ve been running Azure Linux for many years internally, and we got through to 3.0, and we only allowed it on as a container host on AKS. What we’ve done is make it a general-purpose, so this is all the learnings that we’ve had in the heritage of Mariner.”

Under the hood, Azure Linux 4.0 is based on Fedora Linux and is delivered as an open distribution on GitHub. This code is available now. Yes, Red Hat knows that Microsoft has done this. Everson continued, “So, we made a decision to use Fedora as an upstream, so it’s using RPMs in the Fedora ecosystem. Microsoft curates the packages and the supply chain to fit Azure’s cloud platform.” Microsoft also created “it to be purpose-built for Azure, which integrates vertically into all of our infrastructure to give you the best Azure Linux experience on Azure.” While Azure Linux will ship as a VM image, Microsoft is already preparing a developer-friendly path onto Windows desktops: “And as of today, we have it as a VM image for your VM host on Azure. We’re going to announce WSL images as well.”

While developers will be able to run Azure Linux locally through WSL, Microsoft is not positioning it as a traditional desktop Linux. Asked whether he could run it on his laptop, Everson said: “I will be able to run it on my laptop, or what have you. Yes, on Windows 11.” However, when pressed about a desktop experience, Everson was clear that there are “no plans” for a graphical environment. “It’s optimized for server-side in the cloud,” he said, adding that even on a developer machine, users should expect a lean environment. “Minimal packages, yeah. The idea is that we offer you a consistent experience to do your development on your machine, and that you can take your workloads as you develop them on your machine and run them with VS Code. You can run your applications on that, and know that the platform is the same that you’re running on the cloud, so that you have that kind of consistency between environments.”

Flatcar itself remains the upstream project, but Microsoft is packaging it for Azure customers. Everson described Flatcar as “purpose-built, immutable, secure by default, production-ready operating system, and Azure Container Linux is the productization of that, but we’re still investing in the upstream Flatcar ecosystem and pulling that downstream into a productized exterior experience just for container workloads, so it’s a container hosting in AKS.” To underscore the immutable model, he added that “Everything’s baked in, so there is no package manager. We bake the bits into the immutable, and they’re in the immutable version. So Azure Container Linux is the immutable version. So you shouldn’t be changing any system packages or any application packages. Anything that you need to change is customer workloads run in containers.”

In other news

By RitchCraft • Score: 5, Funny Thread

In other late breaking news, wolves in some western states have been accused of purchasing sheep’s clothing. When asked for comment one wolf barked, “we are purchasing ‘cheap’ clothing, nothing to see here.”

2002 Business Case for Microsoft:Green envy &

By NZheretic • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Meanwhile back in 2002 from What’s the Business Case for Microsoft and Open Source?

With apologies to Dr “Suse”, to the tune of “Green Eggs and Ham”.

Linux can. Linux can .Use Linux

That Linux can! That Linux can! I do not like that Linux can!

Do you like open sourcing plan?

I do not like that Linux can. I do not like the open sourcing plan.

Would you like to free source share?

I would not like to free source share. I would not like it anywhere. I do not like open sourcing plan. I do not like that Linux can.

Would you like it very stable? Would you like it to enable?

I do not like it very stable. I do not like it to enable. I do not like to free source share. I do not like it anywhere. I do not like the open sourcing plan. I do not like that Linux can.

Would you use it in a X-Box? Would you use it if it ROCKS?

Not on X-box. Not if it rocks. Not if very stable. Not to enable. I would not let them free source share. I would not let them anywhere. I would not allow open sourcing plan. I do not like that Linux can.

Would you? Could you? In your biz? Use it! Use it! Here it is.

I would not, could not, in our biz.

You may like it. You will see. You may like it if it’s free!

I would not, could not if it’s free. Not in our biz! It should never be!

I do not like it on the X-box. I do not like it that it rocks. I do not like it amongst our biz. I do not like it that it is. I do not like they free source share. I do not like that anywhere. I do not like that Linux can. I do not like you Linux man!

service! service! service! service! Could you, would you, as a service?

Not as a service! Not if it’s free! Not in my biz! Man! Let not it be! I would not, could not, on a X-box. I could not, would not, if it rocks. I will not use it if its stable. I will not use it even to enable. I will not let them free source share. I will not let them anywhere. I do not like open sourcing plan. I do not like that Linux can.

Say! if in copyleft? always free copyleft! Would you, could you, copyleft?

I would not, could not, in copyleft.

Would you, could you, why so nervous?

I would not, could not, I’m NOT nervous. Not as copyleft. Not as a service. Not in my biz. Not if it’s free. I do not like that it can, you see. Not if it’s stable. Not on X-box. Not to enable. Not if it rocks. I will not let them free source share. I do not like it anywhere!

You do not like open sourcing plan?

I do not like that Linux can.

Could you, would you use what we wrote?

I would not, could not, use what you wrote!

Would you, could you, to avoid your bloat?

I could not, would not, avoid bloat. I will not, will not, use what you wrote. I will not compete with them as a service. I will not because it makes us nervous. Not in our biz! Not if it’s free! Not if it is! You let me be! I do not like it on the X-Box. I do not like it that it Rocks. I will not use it if it’s stable. I do not like that it does enable. I do not like they free source share. I do not like it ANYWHERE I do not like open sourcing plan!I do not like that, Linux can.

You do not like it. So you say. Try it! Try it! And you may. Try it and you may, I say.

Man! If you will let me be, I will try it. You will see.

Say! I like open sourcing plan! I do! I like that, Linux can! And I would use it because it’s stable. And I could use it to enable… And I could charge for providing a service. And I could copyleft without being nervous. And in my biz. And still source free. For you can still charge for a service fee!

So I will use it on the networked X-box. And I will promote it because it ROCKS. And I will use it because it’s stable. And I will use it

Wait a second, Fedora based?

By jfdavis668 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
From RedHat, owned by IBM? Have we gone full circle?

Re:Why is this surprising??

By Himmy32 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Blaming Microsoft for systemd is Grade A crackpottery. Their Linux contributions have been GPL and of course are going to be related to the stuff they care about, but haven’t pushed any parallel standards that would fracture the community. Not sure what you are getting about with the GNU comments, they didn’t even pick a non-GNU coreutils/glibc distro like Ubuntu with the rust coreutils swap or even go with something busybox or alpine/musl based. (Not that those other FOSS projects would be bad choices.)

As far as not being able to shift to any other cloud, this Linux distro is literally for their standards-based Kubernetes offering to make people be able run any Linux containerized workload run just like it would anywhere else. Just in an immutable environment where don’t have to worry as much about the security of the underlying host. While also contributing to the Linux Foundation and the CNCF for their work released in a vendor-agostic manner.

Re:Surprise? Everybody’s been saying it.

By TWX • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I’m not so sure about the UI. The history of Microsoft and UI for the past 40 years is that they’re happy to abandon their incumbent UI for different. We saw that with Windows 3.x to ‘95 and NT4, with Windows 98 and the integration of Spyglass Mosaic Internet Explorer, with the transition from Windows ME and Windows 2000 to Windows XP, the subsequent further transition from XP to Windows 7, and the rework from Windows 8.x to Windows 10. We even saw it with Windows 10 to Windows 11.

They change their UI because their customers don’t see the OS being new/different unless they change their UI. If the UI looks the same then the average untrained end user doesn’t know the difference and doesn’t see a value in spending the money to upgrade.

Before Mass Layoffs, Meta Reassigns 7,000 Workers To Focus On AI

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
Meta told employees on Monday that it was reassigning 7,000 workers to focus on new initiatives around artificial intelligence, the latest change in a company transformation spurred by the powerful technology. Employees will be moved to four new organizations focused on building new A.I. tools and apps, Janelle Gale, Meta’s head of human resources, said in an internal memo. The organizations will use “A.I. native design structures” and have fewer managers per employee than other parts of the company, she said, adding that company leaders will send details about the new roles on Wednesday. The restructuring “will make us more productive and make the work more rewarding,” Ms. Gale wrote. Meta declined to comment further on the changes.
The move comes shortly before Meta begins laying off roughly 8,000 employees, or 10 percent of its work force. Ms. Gale also mentioned Wednesday’s layoffs in her memo. “We know days like this are extremely hard, and we appreciate you showing up for each other,” Ms. Gale said.

According to the NYT, employees have been asked to work remotely that day and emails about the layoffs would be sent at 4 a.m. local time. Employees in the United States will receive 16 weeks of severance pay, along with two extra weeks for every year they worked at Meta.

Apologies ahead of time

By TuballoyThunder • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
But I am having a hard time feeling sorry for the people that help make the modern attention-based economy that has savaged privacy. Much of the buffoonery going on today can be laid at the feet of social media.

Re:This is happening

By nightflameauto • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

> It doesn’t matter whether any of it works because they will make it work.

It doesn’t work and they don’t have magic to make it work. To the extent it does work, it’s mostly automating away jobs which could have been automated away long ago but have been kept around for political reasons.

Sure, they can sack people and claim that AI will magically do what they used to do, but that just causes an Enshitification Cascade which leads to nothing working any more. And then we get social collapse.

As doomy as it sounds, I kind of wonder at this point if this isn’t what some involved in tech circles are hoping for. If they can trigger complete social / societal collapse, it would be a *LOT* easier to convince the remaining government structures that the only possible solution is to hand the reins over to those that own the technology that “can save us all.” Which is exactly the sales-pitch the AI prophets have been slinging since the start of the AI obsession. Maybe the end goal isn’t removing the need for workers within the economy. Maybe the end goal is just to destroy whatever’s left of society so that the haves can pick the bones of the corpse, and finally own everything, with no one left to fight for the scraps.

Re:This is happening

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The only thing slowing down adoption of AI is that usable AI costs slightly more than a full-time employee. In 2026 there is no cost savings in replacing your work force with ML/AI systems, although AI can be a work multiplier in some industries allowing for increases in productivity. We’re already seeing the cooling off on the hiring of new college grads for engineering and tech. An old timer can steer several agent projects at once versus training up a junior software developer. The immediate benefits are obvious, but long-term it’s a disaster. Because I can only babysit so many agents at once, and I’ll be walking out of the industry soon, with conceivably fewer people to take my place.

As for the current layoffs? Nothing to do with AI at all. No increase in profit is profitable if you layoff your staff and “replace” them with AI, because the numbers simply don’t add up. Maybe in a year or two it adds up. But right now, we’re seeing companies cutting reoccurring expenses (like payroll) in order to prepare for economic downturn or recession. The tech industry is going into a stealth sleep mode, we’ve painted eyes onto our eyelids or put on dark sunglasses, and the rest of the class still hasn’t caught on that we’re taking a nap.

Amazon’s Alexa+ Now Produces AI-Generated Podcasts

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Amazon is adding AI-generated “podcasts” to Alexa+, letting users request custom audio explainers on any topic featuring two synthetic co-hosts. Variety reports:
Seemingly to dispel the notion that these “podcasts” will be AI audio slop, Amazon emphasized that it has deals with major news organizations to ensure “accurate, real-time news and information.” Those include the Associated Press, Reuters, the Washington Post, Time magazine, Forbes, Business Insider, Politico and USA Today; publications from Conde Nast, Hearst and Vox Media; and more than 200 local newspapers across the U.S.

In an example clip shared by Amazon of the new Alexa Podcasts feature, the two AI-generated hosts discuss “the latest music releases.” A male Alexa+ narrator says more than 50% of music listening now comes from unsigned artists. “The monoculture is just gone,” a female-voiced Alexa+ narrator chimes in. The male Alexa+ host says there has been “stoner metal,” indie pop and experimental hip-hop music “all dropping on the same Friday,” and adds, “That’s not chaos — that’s the healthiest the music ecosystem has ever been.”

[…] To use Alexa Podcasts, users can simply tell Alexa what topic they’re curious about and “it does the rest in minutes.” Alexa+ will provide an overview of what it plans to cover, and let you adjust the length and direction before it generates the podcast. When your episode is ready, you’ll get a notification on your Echo Show device and the Alexa app.

With the current generation

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
With the current generation of AI, reading/listening just makes me feel stupider. The prose is not quite tight, and it makes my brain go to sleep. The fact that I’m never sure what I’m listening to is true or not doesn’t help.

I could see this being useful as a bit of a replacement for white noise, but even for that, there are so many good podcasts around that I will never run out.

Cargo Cult ?

By ZERO1ZERO • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I can’t think of anything worse than this. (OK well I can but..) This has all the veneer of a ‘podcast’ (ugh i hate that term) but without any of the substance. Why on earth would I want to listen to a fake podcast ? What the actual fuck. I listen to radio, long form talk, and ‘podcasts’ because I want to hear what the person has to say. either the show host or the interviewee. This really just sounds like a way to get adverts and effectively droids inserted into content that looks like something it isn’t. horrifying.

Re:With the current generation

By alexgieg • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Yep. Whenever I heard a “that’s not X, that’s Y”, a “here’s the surprising thing”, a “here’s what no one’s talking about”, a “it isn’t about P, it isn’t about Q, it isn’t even about R, it’s about S”, and similar sloppisms, I immediately stop watching/listening/reading, downvote, block, and try to forget the broken timeline we all ended up in.

The silver lining is that there’s a tiny but growing movement among young people, late Gen Z and early Alpha mostly, who are so tired of all the BS they’re actively going offline and analog, which makes sense, after all, all the adults are online, and kids always want to do the opposite of whatever boring adults are doing. I hope something worthwhile comes from that impulse.

Newflash for the bean counters

By Spacejock • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
YOU may believe all content is interchangeable, and you may see this AI-generated crap as functionally equivalent to human-generated podcasts, but as you shovel this garbage onto your audience you should know that your audience does, in fact, know the difference.

AI hallucination in a factual broadcast is like catshit on a pizza: It doesn’t matter how infrequent it is, no amount is acceptable.

Re:Today’s easiest prediction

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

On YouTube, AI slop is being created all the time. For example many “historical” WWII channels are pumping out all sorts of misinformation. Videos made within the last two years are highly suspect. Thankfully there seem to be a trend where the titles were all click bait. “German POWs shocked by American. . " “Japanese female POWs surprised by American. . . " The general plot is that Axis military forces were “shocked” by the Americans in some way, but the characters were fictional. For example, I could not find any historical accounts of Japanese female POWs held by Americans because Japan did not have women serving in the military. The vast majority of Japanese women in camps were the US women of Japanese descent held in the internment camps. The vast majority of Japanese women held by the US in Japan would have been in civilian refugee camps not POW camps.

The premise of these stories however was undercut by reality. Towards the end of WWII, the Axis powers were lacking in resources and personnel. The Americans who were winning the war having more resources and functioning logistics chains should not “shock” anyone.

Europe Tests Laser Links As Satellite Comms Outgrow Radio

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Europe is testing laser-based satellite communications through a new mountaintop ground station in Greece, aiming to deliver faster, more secure links than traditional radio systems as bandwidth demand grows. The Register reports:
Lithuanian space and defense biz Astrolight says that it has commissioned a new optical ground station in Greece that will support ESA-backed CubeSat missions testing laser-based communications between satellites and Earth. The Holomondas Optical Ground Station was built through the PeakSat project, led by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki with backing from the European Space Agency and Greece’s Ministry of Digital Governance. Its job is to receive data from satellites via infrared laser links rather than the radio systems that space operators have relied on for decades.

PeakSat and ERMIS-3, two Greek CubeSats launched in March under ESA’s wider Greek IOD/IOV mission program, both carry Astrolight’s ATLAS-1 optical communication terminal. Astrolight also built the ground segment, giving the project a fully integrated end-to-end optical communications setup. […] The company says the station uses an 808-nanometer laser beacon and an optical C-band receiver capable of receiving data at up to 2.5 Gbps. Unlike traditional RF systems, optical links use tightly focused infrared beams that are harder to intercept or jam while also supporting significantly higher throughput.

Re:Only 2.5Gbps?

By test321 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The summary says “harder to intercept or jam”, and the company seems to be involved in the defence market.

It also says “supporting significantly higher throughput”, so maybe the limitation to Gbps is only because it’s a first test.

Re:Only 2.5Gbps?

By nospam007 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

This is the Holomondas station specifically, which is essentially a test and validation facility built around a converted astronomical observatory.

It’s the first step, meant to prove the concept works reliably through the atmosphere with the CubeSats they just launched in March.

CubeSats are tiny, with limited power and small optics, so they can’t drive a high-bandwidth laser link regardless of what the ground station could handle.

The real numbers come with the bigger systems. The Hellas Sat 5 / SOLiS system is targeting up to 1 Tbps, which is 400 times faster. That’s a full geostationary satellite with a proper optical payload, not a shoebox-sized CubeSat.

PlayStation Exclusives Aren’t Coming To PC Anymore

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge:
Sony reportedly won’t release its major single-player PlayStation games on PC anymore. According to Bloomberg’s Jason Schreier, Hermen Hulst, who heads up PlayStation’s studios business, informed employees in a town hall on Monday about the change in strategy. Schreier had previously reported on the shift in March, saying that Sony scrapped plans to launch PC versions of last year’s Ghost of Ytei and “other internally developed games.” Online games will still come to multiple platforms following this change in strategy, Schreier reported at the time.

In recent years, Sony has released many of its biggest games on PC, including Spider-Man 2, Ghost of Tsushima, both The Last of Us games, Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered, and multiplayer titles like Helldivers 2 and Marathon. Two years ago, Hulst committed to releasing PlayStation’s live-service games “day and date” on PC and PS5, but its single-player PC releases have been less consistent, with Hulst saying that the company takes a “more strategic approach.”
In April, Microsoft’s new Xbox chief Asha Sharma said the company is "reevaluating” exclusive games for the platform. “Players are frustrated,” she wrote in a memo. “New feature drops on console have been less frequent. Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough. Pricing is getting harder for people to keep up with. And core experiences like search, discovery, social, and personalization still feel too fragmented.”

“The model that got us here won’t be the one that takes us forward,” the memo adds.

Seems a little retrograde

By DrXym • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I wonder if Sony is getting a bit scared of Valve. Maybe they’re even seeing how well their games are selling on the PC and the fact they’re selling well scares them even more than if they didn’t.

But at the end of the day it’s free money. Sell the game exclusive on the console for a year or two and when it’s back catalogue port it over to the PC and sell it again.

Sony themselves said they didn’t sell well

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
And that was the reason why they were pulling them, not the desire for exclusivity.

Pulling them off of PC is actually a problem for Sony because modern AAA games are so expensive to produce that it’s difficult for them to be profitable on a single platform. Even when you have the most popular platform out there like Sony does.

I don’t think helldivers was ever really designed to be a PlayStation exclusive. Also don’t think it was meant to take off like it did. It’s closer to a AA game in scope. When you play something like the Horizon games with all the voice acting and cut scenes and incredibly elaborate animation and dozens of different features and options and hyperbalanced gameplay you are looking at something that had a ridiculous budget.

So something like helldivers 2 had somewhere around 50 to 70 million dollar budget versus the 200 million they spend on Horizon Forbidden West.

Also the hell divers games were in development for 8 years, a lot of the budget was just development hell where is the Spider-Man games or the Horizon games cost that much even when the games were making solid progress in development because they were just so freaking huge in scope.

Sony came to the PC hoping to make enough money to make the games themselves profitable or at least break even. It doesn’t seem like a modern single player, triple A game can be profitable. Even Grand theft Auto needs to rely heavily on multiplayer content to do it.

Because of XBOX

By more_pickles • Score: 4, Informative Thread
I’m surprised no one has mentioned it yet, but this move is almost certainly because of XBOX. Microsoft has already announced that their next console will play PC games. I think that move was largely a way for Microsoft to get PC-ported Playstation games on XBOX. Sony probably has no problem with their games on the PC, but there’s no way they want to support their competitor’s dedicated console when they make so much money on Playstation.

Re:They never were.

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Informative Thread

PlayStation exclusives have never been released on PC before, have yet to be released.

There have been a few former PS exclusives in recent years: God of War (2018), God of War Ragnarök, Horizon Zero Dawn, Horizon Forbidden West, Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales to name a few.

Re:yeah there’s a reason for that

By UnknowingFool • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
PC ports are also harder than the PS ones because optimization is a harder problem on PCs. PlayStation hardware is known. PC hardware is highly variable. A major complaint of Xbox developers is the Xbox Series S and X have different hardware capabilities but MS expected games would have similar performance on both. So developers optimized games for the S and these games were not perform as well as PS versions.

FBI Wants to Buy Nationwide Access to License Plate Readers

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The FBI is seeking up to $36 million for nationwide access to automated license plate reader (ALPRs) data, which could let it query vehicle movements across the U.S. and its territories through a commercial database. 404 Media reports:
“The FBI has a crucial need for accessible LPRs to provide a diverse and reliable range of collections across the United States. This data should be available across major highways and in an array of locations for maximum usefulness to law enforcement,” a statement of work, which describes what data the FBI is seeking access to, reads. ALPR cameras generally work by constantly scanning the color, brand, model, and license plate of vehicles that drive by. This creates a timestamped record of where a particular vehicle was at a specific time that law enforcement can then query, effectively letting them see exactly where someone drove across time. The technology has existed for decades, but has become more pervasive in recent years.

The FBI says it is looking for a vendor that will let it log into a Software-as-a-Service system and then query the collected ALPR data with license plate information, a description of the vehicle, a time or date, and geolocation information. The FBI says it is looking for ALPR coverage in the following areas: Eastern 48 (East of the Mississippi River); Western 48 (West of the Mississippi River); Hawaii; Puerto Rico; Alaska; and outlying areas such as Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or Tribal Territories. In effect, the FBI is looking for ALPR data nationwide and even beyond. An attached price template indicates the FBI is willing to pay $6 million for each of those broad areas, bringing the total to $36 million.

The FBI says it intends to award the contract to a single vendor, but if any such vendor is unable to fulfill all of the requirements, the agency may award the contract to up to two vendors. The contract is specifically for the FBI’s Directorate of Intelligence, which oversees the agency’s intelligence mission. The FBI is not only a law enforcement agency, but also part of the Intelligence Community.
The report notes that the contract appears aimed at vendors like Flock or Motorola Solutions, since they’re some of the only companies able to provide the sort of data the FBI is seeking.
Further reading: Small Town Fights Over Flock’s AI-Enhanced Network of License Plate-Reading Cameras

Federal Bribery and Taxpayer Abuse.

By geekmux • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

FBI Wants to Buy Nationwide Access to License Plate Readers

Translation: A Federal agency purposely fucking bound by Constitutional limits within the Bill of Rights, is now so openly corrupt that they are brazenly requesting to spend taxpayer money in order to buy that which they are not allowed to legally capture.

You want new toys to do your job? Start remembering the fucking law first, children.

We the People, need to end the data broker loophole.

Let me guess …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The FBI says it intends to award the contract to a single vendor, …

Like with re-surfacing the Reflecting Pool, Trump will “know a guy, that’s done work for him” - that he’ll later say he’s never heard of - and it will end up being be a no-bid contract for $35M, that will end up actually being a large multiple of that, which we find out from a reporter who Trump will call treasonous and/or stupid - for pointing out inconvenient facts/truth. In any case, just another avenue for corruption, at our expense. /s

Re:Federal Bribery and Taxpayer Abuse.

By bobby • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They’ve been doing it for dozens of years. I’m 100% with you. How are companies like Flock and Motorola Solutions allowed to do this? If We the People were being represented, we’d have strong privacy laws, and no crooked company would be allowed to record us.

Re:Federal Bribery and Taxpayer Abuse.

By sg_oneill • Score: 5, Informative Thread

At the moment the Roberts administration appears to be interpreting the constitution as “Whatever the administration says it is, because we’ve made it nearly impossible to enforce” thanks to a serious of malicious rulings that seem to mean that any decision that finds a law unconstitutional only finds it unconstitutional for the specific person suing.

Hell, legally Trump isn’t even supposed to be president because he’s convicted of leading an insurrection which specifically disqualifies him, but the roberts court decided that seemingly nobody is allowed to sue to enforce it.

America does not have a constitution anymore. Not in any sense that counts. Why americans are not flipping cop cars in open rebelion is beyond me. You had a good thing, then you let it go.

Re: Federal Bribery and Taxpayer Abuse.

By quonset • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It really should matter. If we can just decide the text means whatever we want it to mean, what’s the point in writing it down?

As clearly shown by the current hacks on the Supreme Court. “Privacy in the 9th Amendment? Never heard of it.” “Limited government? What’s that?”

New Windows ‘MiniPlasma’ Zero-Day Exploit Gives SYSTEM Access, PoC Released

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A researcher known as Chaotic Eclipse has released a proof-of-concept exploit for a new Windows zero-day dubbed MiniPlasma, which BleepingComputer confirmed can grant SYSTEM privileges on fully patched Windows 11 systems. The researcher claims the bug is effectively a still-exploitable version of a 2020 flaw Microsoft said it had fixed. From the report:
At the time, the flaw was assigned the CVE-2020-17103 identifier and reportedly fixed in December 2020. “After investigating, it turns out the exact same issue that was reported to Microsoft by Google project zero is actually still present, unpatched,” explains Chaotic Eclipse. “I’m unsure if Microsoft just never patched the issue or the patch was silently rolled back at some point for unknown reasons. The original PoC by Google worked without any changes.”

BleepingComputer tested the exploit on a fully patched Windows 11 Pro system running the latest May 2026 Patch Tuesday updates. In our test, we used a standard user account, and after running the exploit, it opened a command prompt with SYSTEM privileges, as shown in the image [here]. Will Dormann, principal vulnerability analyst at Tharros, also confirmed the exploit works in his tests on the latest public version of Windows 11. However, he said that the flaw does not work in the latest Windows 11 Insider Preview Canary build.

The exploit appears to abuse how the Windows Cloud Filter driver handles registry key creation through an undocumented CfAbortHydration API. Forshaw’s original report said that the flaw could allow arbitrary registry keys to be created in the .DEFAULT user hive without proper access checks, potentially enabling privilege escalation. While Microsoft reports having fixed the bug as part of its December 2020 Microsoft Patch Tuesday, Chaotic Eclipse now claims the vulnerability can still be exploited.

Untrustworthy is an Understatement

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

It’s hard to prove that Microsoft cares less about security than other vendors, without a bunch of information from Microsoft and other vendors that we’re not privy to — not even shareholders get to know the full risks involved in the products upon which their dividends depend. But it’s easy to prove that they will happily lie about it.

Re:Well, at least there haven’t been any Linux 0 d

By T34L • Score: 5, Informative Thread

On Linux, there’s at least an expectation that someone will try and fix the zero days after they’re are discovered.

On Windows there’s zero-days that’ve been published six years ago and just work with the then attached guide.

Re:Well, at least there haven’t been any Linux 0 d

By organgtool • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
The difference between Windows and Linux in this area is that Linux generally takes security flaws seriously, addresses them quickly, and leaves the fixes in place. With Microsoft, there’s a common pattern to slow-roll the whole process: deny the flaw exists, then when it becomes undeniable, claim that it can’t be exploited, then once a PoC is released, diminish the severity of the exploit. This process usually spans months and meanwhile Windows users are left with their pants around their ankles and puckered assholes.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Vista cleaned up many of the worst architectural flaws in Windows and provided a much more secure foundation for Windows. All Microsoft has to do is prioritize security issues as soon as they’re reported and they wouldn’t consistently be reduced to a laughingstock in the industry. But I guess it wouldn’t be Microsoft if they took security seriously.

Re:Untrustworthy is an Understatement

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

So? The Linux kernel folks patched within hours or days. And these vulnerabilities are unlikely to crop up again. You are comparing apples and oranges. Also note that building a big, bloated KISS violation of a “kernel”, as Microsoft does, certainly counts as “not caring about security”. The only way to get good security in software, and even more so in kernels, is by simplicity. Microsoft certainly knows that. But raking in the dollars is far more important to them.

So ask yourself: Why are you defending Microsoft with invalid arguments?

Nintendo Tries To Obtain Touchscreen-Specific Patent On Monster Capturing

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Nintendo is trying to secure a touchscreen-specific monster-catching patent that could be relevant to Palworld Mobile. Japan’s patent office has initially rejected the application for lacking an inventive step over prior art, but the company could appeal or amend the claims. Games Fray reports:
The Japan Patent Office (JPO) has now made a new monster-catching patent application by Nintendo public. Patent Application No. 2026-019762 covers monster-catching of the kind already asserted against the PC and console versions of Palworld and is from the same patent family as two of the three patents Nintendo is already asserting against Palworld, but with a touchscreen focus. Potential targets are the upcoming Palworld Mobile game and Tencent’s Roco Kingdom: World, which is presently available only in China but likely to expand internationally. Nintendo filed the application this year with a request for a fast-tracked review. The JPO has indeed been quick, and the response is that Nintendo’s application lacks an inventive step over the prior art.

Nintendo already amended the claims in February and can try to amend them again. It can try to persuade the examiner and potentially appeal the decision. But the initial rejection suggests that Nintendo will not obtain the desired touchscreen monster-catching patent quickly. The rejection was communicated on April 24, 2026. Nintendo could abandon the application now, but Nintendo being Nintendo, they are more likely to try to persuade the examiner to arrive at a different conclusion, even though the reasons for the rejection are strong. In many patent examination processes, the initial rejection is essentially just an invitation to present one’s best arguments. Here, however, the rejection notice is so well-reasoned that it will be an uphill battle for Nintendo.
Nintendo’s application would cover a touchscreen-controlled game in which a player moves through “a field in a virtual space,” uses “a capture item for capturing a field character,” and can summon “a battle character” to fight that creature. During combat, the game would display “a plurality of commands including at least an attack command and an item command,” selected through “an operation input using the touch panel.”
The key claim is that when the capture item is used “during a battle” or “in a non-battle state,” the game performs “a capture success determination,” and, if successful, “the field character is captured and set to a state owned by the player.”

Just a reminder they didn’t invent Pokemon

By rsilvergun • Score: 3, Interesting Thread
The basic idea, which their own people have admitted, came from a old Japanese live action TV series called ultra 7 which is in the Ultraman series.

So it’s patently ridiculous, pun intended, for them to be trying to get patents on something they didn’t come up with on their own. Never mind the obvious ridiculousness of everything about this.

Patent abuse

By memory_register • Score: 3, Informative Thread

This makes as much sense as having a patent on driving games or shooting games. It is lazy lawfare.

Re:Just a reminder they didn’t invent Pokemon

By Gideon Fubar • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

There were also two Megami Tensei games and the first Shin Megami Tensei released by the time Pokemon Red and Green were released in Japan in 1994.

They never should have had a patent on that, and they shouldn’t be allowed to add ‘with a stylus’ to the end of it and suddenly patent something they couldn’t before… just like they shouldn’t be able to add ‘on the internet’.

Pokémon Go

By Meneth • Score: 3 Thread
One would think their own Pokémon Go would count as prior art, released in 2016.

Game mechanics should not be patentable

By Turkinolith • Score: 3 Thread
Game mechanics can be implemented in so many different ways that they are in themselves an abstraction of an implementation. They should not be patentable.