Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Short Story Accused of Being AI-written Goes on to Win Contest’s First Prize
  2. GoDaddy Warns India’s Crackdown on Fake Site Registrars Could Upend Internet Privacy Everywhere
  3. EV Batteries Defy Expectations, Last Hundreds of Thousands of Miles
  4. Hobbit-like Humans May Have Scavenged Komodo Dragons’ Leftovers to Survive
  5. New Google Ad Imagines America’s ‘Declaration of Independence’ Written With AI Help
  6. Are Wars Blurring Lines Between Corporate and National Security?
  7. New DNA Tech Identifies Soldier Killed in America’s Revolution in 1780
  8. 842,000 American Households Lost Power Today During a Heatwave
  9. Did Microsoft Shift Its Profits to Low-Tax Countries?
  10. FSF Shares Update on ‘LibrePhone’ and New Automated Site Monitoring Tool
  11. AOL’s Owner Bending Spoons Hits Wall Street with $1.7 billion IPO
  12. EchoStar’s US Satellite Pay-TV Provider Dish DBS Files for Bankruptcy
  13. Decades-Old Bash Tricks Expose AI Coding Agents To Supply Chain Attacks
  14. What Is a Quantum Computer Good For? Absolutely Nothing - Yet
  15. Startup Targets Datacenters With 3D-Printed Nuclear Reactor Module

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Short Story Accused of Being AI-written Goes on to Win Contest’s First Prize

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A story widely accused on social media of being written using AI has gone on to win the overall Commonwealth short story prize,” reports the Guardian.

In mid-May the story had been selected as a regional winner, but with critics on X and Bluesky "claiming it showed ‘obvious markers’ of AI use.”
In the wake of the controversy, the Commonwealth Foundation conducted a review of the regional winners, which it said involved looking at drafts, time-stamped documents and notes. “We are satisfied with the testimonies of our writers and their confirmation that AI was not used in their writing,” said foundation director-general Razmi Farook… Judging chair Louise Doughty described Nazir’s piece as “an original, poetic and deeply moving story....” In a film released by the Commonwealth Foundation on Tuesday, Nazir… adds that he wrote six or seven drafts of his prize-winning story, and also speaks about his use of speech-to-text software, explaining that he could only see three or four lines of text on his phone screen at any one time, so he would perfect each line before moving on, which is how his story ended up being “highly polished”…

Initial social media reactions to the Commonwealth Foundation’s announcement of Nazir’s win were negative, with one X user writing: “immensely disappointing and disheartening. it feels like they wanted to stick to their guns after the entire GenAI uproar. I might think twice now before submitting my stories here”. After Nazir was announced as the regional winner in May, some social media users reported running his story through AI-detection software. “Pangram flags at 100% but also, come on, if you know you know”, said Wharton professor Ethan Mollick. However, the reliability of AI-detection software has been called into question.

In a statement to the Guardian, Farook said that “rather than surrender our judgment to AI-detection software, we asked our winners to show their working drafts, outlines, the evidence of an artistic journey. That software, it must be said, is not infallible: it returns inconsistent verdicts and, in doing so, corrodes the very trust on which a prize depends.”

“When the machine’s default voice is the metropolitan one, the writer who does not fit the expected mould is the first to fall under suspicion,” she added. “The more startling her gift, the more her unfamiliar brilliance unsettles, the more readily she is accused of being a machine. A young writer in Kingston or Kolkata, in Kuala Lumpur or Kigali, must now prove not only her talent but her very humanity.”
Nazir’s story beat 7,806 other stories, the video points out (adding that their prize “demonstrates that in a world increasingly driven by algorithms, the human voice still matters.”)

The Guardian notes that the winning story “includes multiple ‘not x, but y’ constructions and lists of three, which some consider to be signs of AI use,” and that critics also drew attention to particular lines like “Sun on galvanise is a cruel instrument” and “Marsha lived two bends down.”

In a new interview with the Times of India Nazir says “Now I’m frightened about publishing new work because the attacks haven’t stopped.”
Q: Which passages attracted the most criticism, and why do you think they were misunderstood?

Nazir: People criticised a line where I wrote: ‘She had the kind of walking that made benches become men.’ That’s magical realism. Think Salman Rushdie or Gabriel Garcia Marquez. It’s a literary technique. In my story, the character ‘Zoongie’ believes she is so beautiful that even when no men are around, she imagines the benches becoming men who admire her. It exists only in her imagination. People interpreted it literally. There was another line about light reflecting from a sink. That came directly from my childhood. Our kitchen faced east, and my mother liked to keep everything spotless. We used to polish the sink, and when the morning sun hit it, it glittered brightly. People claimed that the image must have been AI-generated. But it’s from my lived experience…

I’ve lived with diabetes for 62 years, which has damaged the nerves in my fingers and feet, and I’m currently undergoing chemotherapy. That’s why I began using speech-to-text on my Android phone… I hope this episode leads to a better understanding of the difference between assistive technology and AI-generated writing…

Q: Many acclaimed writers like Ursula K Le Guin, Mary Shelley, and JRR Tolkien have also been falsely flagged by AI detectors. Where does this leave writers?

Nazir: What these AI detectors are saying is that if a piece of writing is too polished, it must have been written by AI. I refuse to accept that. AI was trained on human writing. Large language models, to me, are tools, much like a word processor. They don’t replace the human spirit behind creative writing. Ask an AI to write a prize-winning story on its own and see what it produces. You still need human imagination and judgment to create literature.
Nazir added, “What I don’t understand is why people continue to question the judges’ decision.”

Detectors Grossly Overestimate Their Ability

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 3 Thread

There’s no way to reliably determine whether something was written by AI or not. They can think it’s AI. They can point out similarities between a text and typical AI slop. But those “markers” are circumstantial and don’t prove anything. Furthermore, as AI is trained to avoid the tells of the past, it has become near impossible to say that something was written by AI with even vague certainty. And companies that use AI to “accurately detect AI” are liars, thieves, and 100% full of shit.
These are some of the reasons why no one can say whether this comment was written by AI, William Shakespeare, a Yemenese moron, a room full of monkeys with shit splattered typewriters.

GoDaddy Warns India’s Crackdown on Fake Site Registrars Could Upend Internet Privacy Everywhere

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“The internet is filled with fakes,” writes Gizmodo. “A court in India is setting out to address the problem by requiring more transparency from domain registrars to make it easier to crack down on fraud. And while the intentions might be good, Reuters is reporting that major American domain registrar GoDaddy is sounding the warning bells that the court’s decision could fundamentally reshape the internet well beyond India’s borders.”

GoDaddy argues the move would even make the internet less safe, reports Reuters :
[Online fraud] is a key challenge for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government, which last year received 2.4 million complaints of alleged cyber fraud amounting to $2.4 billion. Starting in 2019, lawsuits were brought by dozens of Indian and global firms — Amazon against fake shopping sites trading on its name and McDonald’s complaining against bogus sites offering franchises. [More than 20 companies filed a complaint, the article notes, including Microsoft.] In December, an Indian court blocked more than 1,100 such websites. The New Delhi judge however went further, ordering sweeping new measures that tech experts say have rewritten rules of internet governance: Domain sellers should not offer buyers free privacy protection by default, the buyer’s details should be released to anyone with a “legitimate interest” within 72 hours, and website addresses that are variations of protected brand names must be prohibited.

U.S.-based GoDaddy has challenged the directives before a larger bench of judges at the Delhi High Court, according to a Reuters review of non-public filings. It says the ruling will affect legitimate businesses that have names similar to big brands. Stopping privacy-by-default features, GoDaddy said, will result in public disclosure of name, address, telephone and email of legitimate website owners, exposing them to “foreseeable privacy and security risks” such as stalking and harassment.

As domain names operate globally, not locally, the order could force GoDaddy to regulate website addresses across the world, it said. On the court’s order imposing a 72-hour deadline on companies to provide registration details to anyone with “legitimate interest”, GoDaddy argues it has no wherewithal to assess who has legitimate interest or not. The “commercially destabilising” directives may force domain name companies to “exit India”, said one of GoDaddy’s appeal documents that ran into 5,121 pages… GoDaddy rivals, Arizona-based Namecheap and Netherlands-based Hosting Concepts, have also challenged the New Delhi ruling, court records show, although Reuters could not ascertain details of their appeals…

GoDaddy argues that diluting the privacy feature will run contrary to India’s data protection law and the European Union GDPR law which mandates a “privacy by default” approach. Farzaneh Badii, a New York-based researcher on internet governance, criticised the New Delhi ruling, noting that Europe redacted such details because publishing them had been abused by harassment and targeted phishing. “The people exposed will be journalists, activists, small business owners, and private individuals. The brand impersonators will not,” she said…

While the sweeping December directives were issued by a court, they followed government’s submissions, documents showed… The judges will hear the appeals on July 16.
GoDaddy manages 80 million domains and serves over 20 million users, the article points out, with annual revenue over $5 billion.

Fuck GoDaddy. No website owner should be hidden.

By Fly Swatter • Score: 3 Thread
Bring back the requirement of public whois records with an actual verified address. The modern internet is too much of a scam to hide any website’s owner.

If you are worried about news reporters and whistleblowers there are already sites for that to provide anonymoty - but the website owner itself NEVER needs to hide ownership unless it is some sleezy scammer or thief type site.

EV Batteries Defy Expectations, Last Hundreds of Thousands of Miles

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
247,000 miles on an EV battery? So says the owner of a U.K.-based used-car sales company that specializes in Evs, who tells the Wall Street Journal EV batteries keep performing well even after several hundred thousand miles. “They are proving themselves to be exceptionally reliable.”
After five years on the road, the average EV will still be able to drive up to 95% of its original range, according to Recurrent, a data-science company that provides a battery-monitoring tool for EVs — better than many in the auto industry expected…

Potential new car buyers’ fear of having to pay for a battery replacement is the number one reason they choose to steer clear of EVs, according to a 2025 survey from industry research firm AutoPacific. When early EVs hit the market, buyers’ concerns were well-founded. Roughly one in 12 EVs built from 2011 to 2016 have had to have battery replacements. But new data shows that more modern EVs are doing better so far. Among EVs built from 2022 on, 0.3% have had battery replacements, according to a 2025 study from Recurrent. As battery technology has advanced, EVs have avoided problems like the ones that plagued the original Nissan Leaf when it hit the market in 2010, for example. Those cars lacked the battery-cooling technology that is in newer EVs, and they made headlines for wearing down quickly. Buyer perception hasn’t quite caught up, according to Scott Case, co-founder and chief executive of Recurrent…

The newest battery-powered EVs have lifespans comparable to internal-combustion-engine vehicles, even when driven more miles, according to Viet Nguyen-Tien, a research officer at the London School of Economics who focuses on Evs. Improvements in car batteries’ chemical contents, battery-management systems and thermal regulation have been the difference in making batteries last longer and cost less, Nguyen-Tien said. Battery prices have fallen more than 90% since 2010, according to a BloombergNEF report from late last year. Industry analysts say battery-replacement costs are also improving as more EVs are designed for repairability in the long-haul. An out-of-warranty battery replacement can cost anywhere from $5,000 to $16,000, depending on the manufacturer, according to Recurrent. But many EV manufacturers have shifted to allow smaller components of their battery packs to be repaired, which can allow owners to avoid the full costs of a battery replacement, Case said.

EV batteries aren’t without their challenges, though. A battery that is frequently fast-charged with high power loses its range, on average, at twice the rate of a battery charged at a lower power, according to telematics company Geotab. Frequently charging a battery to 100%, or letting it rest at 0% for extended periods, can also reduce range long-term. And EVs regularly deliver less range in extreme cold or heat.
The article also includes two new projections on EV adoption:

Defy FUD, Meet Expectations

By crow • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I don’t know what expectations these are defying unless they’re from those created by anti-EV FUD. I thought it was pretty clear that EV batteries usually last longer than the cars themselves. If 250K is exceeding expectations, then the expectations are wrong and haven’t been supported by the data for a long time.

Re: If this were true…

By markdavis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

>“Leaf were a special case. I think they were air cooled as didn’t like fast charging”

The Leaf has been around a long, long time, so it used the oldest tech. The Ariya, and now the new (2026+) Leaf use a slightly different chemistry (high nickel), coupled with battery cooling (liquid to air AND liquid to active HVAC) and heating (standard). They are going to last a LOT longer (and charge faster).

One strange quirk is that the Ariya had no percent charge limiter, at all. Very annoying. I believe it was a marketing thing, trying to raise confidence that you can charge to 100% every time without worrying about battery wear. The reality is that it might not matter as much as in the past, but it is still a very valid factor. More annoying is they added the charge percent limiter in the new Leaf, but didn’t software update the Ariya with that ability (yet, but nobody is holding their breath).

In any case the batteries will wear much less if:

1) Charge is limited to around 70-80% or so, max, when possible/convenient.
2) Charge is not allowed to go very low (like 20% or less).
3) Rapid DC charging is avoided. And if used, charge only to 80%
4) Frequent narrow charging is always better (like 45%-70% or 60%-80%) than less-frequent wider charging (like 30%-80%).
5) Never allow vehicle to sit in hot weather for many days at or near 100% charge (even Nissan does relay this info).

And that holds for all Lithium Ion batteries, in all devices. And most of it also applies to Lithium phosphate as well. Much of the above is not possible (or practical) unless you do at-home charging, which is why that is an important component in EV satisfaction. There is probably no need now to “baby” the batteries. But just some simple guidelines to consider/perform when convenient and when you don’t need the range, can probably greatly extended the battery life.

As a side note, people were critical of the Aryia’s maximum DC/fast charge amperage (130kW), only to find that the systems are so improved over older vehicles, that the actual charge time ended up being about the same or even faster (in some cases) than older vehicles with much higher maximum amperage.

Hobbit-like Humans May Have Scavenged Komodo Dragons’ Leftovers to Survive

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
CNN reports:
Prehistoric human relatives, nicknamed “hobbits” due to their short stature, may have been scavengers, rather than skilled hunters capable of taking down big game or building cooking fires, according to new research. The study adds to growing evidence that Homo floresiensis, which had a brain only slightly bigger than that of a chimpanzee, wasn’t as advanced as scientists previously believed....

The researchers believe that much like how Komodo dragons hunt water buffaloes today, they were using their venomous bite to take down Stegodons — and after the scene was clear, Homo floresiensis swept in to cleave meat from what remained… The new study reinforces a long-held suspicion that Homo floresiensis is not a dwarfed form of Homo erectus but a descendant of a more primitive Homo habilis-like or Australopithecus-like form that arrived on the island more than1 million years ago, said Dr. Chris Stringer, a research leader specializing in human origins and paleoanthropology at London’s Natural History Museum.

1 million years …

By evanh • Score: 3 Thread

Why would anyone attribute them as being modern humans when our branch starts about 250 thousand years ago, not 1 million? Or did they just not know the age before?

New Google Ad Imagines America’s ‘Declaration of Independence’ Written With AI Help

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader shared this report from TechCrunch:
Two hundred and fifty years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, a new commercial from Google asks: What if the Founding Fathers had access to Google Workspace?

With the tagline “Group project, but make it 1776,” the ad depicts a largely unseen Thomas Jefferson mid-draft when he gets a nagging text from Ben Franklin, leading to a very Google-centric collaboration process. Edits are suggested in Google Docs, a meeting gets scheduled in Google Calendar and conducted remotely via Google Meet (with every single attendee apparently turning their camera off?), then the whole thing is finalized with e-signatures; cue the fireworks.

Of course, since this is an ad from a tech company in the year 2026, AI has a role to play. The fictionalized founders use Google’s “help me visualize” AI tool to try out different animals on the national seal, Gemini takes notes on the meeting, and the founders also ask the chatbot for advice before declining King George III’s document access request.
TechCrunch call it “very tongue-in-cheek,” noting that at one point Samuel Adams even asks, “Can we settle this over beers?” And they argue that “the AI evangelism is relatively discreet when compared to many other recent ads.”

The Founding Fathers would not have used Google Wo

By Ghostworks • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Jefferson was tapped to write because Franklin as a rule refused to write anything anyone else would be allowed to edit, and Adams knew everyone hated him and anything he touched. Collaboration runs contrary to every single person and situation involved with the draft.

Oh really, google?

By T34L • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Will Gemini really help me set up a secessionist insurrection that’s completely illegal under the current government? I have the weirdest feeling that it won’t, but also feel like trying it isn’t worth being recorded as asking it that.

Why did I have to know this?

By Uldis Segliņš • Score: 3 Thread
Why exactly did I have to know about some tech company having some ad with some overhyped technology used in making it? By same measure we should describe every second Tiktok trash here.

Re: How many beers? A LOT

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Despite our terrible beer, we have quite a few good cocktail recipes. Again thanks to Prohibition for that.

Here’s one - Trump’s Reflecting Pool:

2 oz. rum
4 oz pineapple juice
1 oz blue curaçao
handful blueberries, mashed then torn

- Place ice in a rocks glass.
- Add rum and blue curaçao; stir.
- Quickly pour in pineapple juice (don’t stir!), then top with torn mashed blueberries.

gotta love AI generated ads

By usedtobestine • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The voices sound artificial, the backgrounds are all copied from major brands or infamous podcasters, and they’ve generated one for every every city so they all sound like a political campaign flunky on your doorstep proclaiming the benefits of the product for you in your city. If I watch the video from the same computer and browser proxied through my company vpn, I get the same ad with a different colour person and a different city which corresponds to my company’s proxy address.

Are Wars Blurring Lines Between Corporate and National Security?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Subsea cables. Ukrainian power stations. Russian oil refineries. Even airports, water-desalination plants and Amazon data centers.

They’ve all become targets in wartime, notes the Wall Street Journal, and around the world now arguments “are already brewing between companies and governments over new regulations and potential costs.”
In Germany, powerful associations representing private companies and municipal utilities have pushed back against new standards for physical protection, warning they could spell financial ruin. New Zealand’s government has faced resistance from industry groups over a proposal to fine critical-infrastructure companies and their directors for cybersecurity breaches… A sign of how lines are blurring: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s 32 countries last year agreed that as part of a pact to spend 5% of economic output on defense and security, 1.5% would go to military-adjacent needs including protecting critical infrastructure and networks. Spending targets range from cybersecurity and industrial capacity to railroads, bridges and ports needed for military logistics… “We need a wide concept of defense — defense is no longer just military,” said Italian Adm. Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, NATO’s top military adviser.

Adding to the complexity, companies now need to protect the data networks that serve as gateways to critical infrastructure. Hackers increasingly target not just computer files to steal information but also systems managing vital functions like building access and factory control, remotely causing physical damage or enabling espionage. U.S. authorities in April warned that Iranian hackers were trying to disrupt American drinking-water systems by targeting computer equipment that connects hardware with software. A year earlier, suspected Russian hackers remotely manipulated valves on a Norwegian hydroelectric dam…

Another challenge will be parsing jurisdictions and liability for assets that cross international waters or are damaged in combat — such as subsea data cables or energy pipelines. Turf battles between law enforcement and militaries are already complicating efforts… “The private owner can invest in redundancy, monitoring, and repair capacity, but only governments and militaries can really deter, patrol, attribute, or respond to hostile state activity,” said Marc Glasser, who worked on cybersecurity and infrastructure security for three decades at the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Department of Homeland Security.... Companies say they need greater clarity from governments on what protections they will provide and subsidies to help them defend privately owned assets that provide a public good. Most governments don’t provide incentives for companies to invest more than the minimum legal resilience requirements.
The article notes that in May the chief executive of California’s Port of Long Beach “launched a cyber-defense operations center to thwart tens of thousands of cyberattacks daily, which jeopardize computer systems and all equipment connected to them.”

The article also points out that the EU adopted new regulations requiring countries to reduce vulnerabilities, and new laws proposed in the U.K. now “seek to increase penalties for subsea sabotage, updating codes that date to when telegraph cables were first laid in the 19th century.”

Is This Question a Joke?

By rbrander • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

“I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. "
      -Gen. Smedley Butler, 1933

A lot of American wars are at the behest of resource-seeking corporations. National forces are brought out when corporate enforcers are inadequate or expensive. I thought all this got very obvious, too, when “Blackwater” was so much in the news during Iraq, and the legal need to give them the same immunity to every Iraqi law that American national troops enjoyed.

Are Wars Blurring Lines…

By korgitser • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Are Wars Blurring Lines Between Corporate and National Security?

No. For everyone who can put two and two together it has always been obvious that:

1) Everything a country needs to function at war time is of strategic importance, and needs to be protected, defended, duplicated, and easily repaired, and

2) Everything a country needs to function at war time is going to be attacked. You can cry “civilian infrastructure” as much as you want, but the civilian economy supports, and is therefore largely indistinguishable from, the war economy. Damaging one means damaging another, means better chances of winning.

It was only corporations and politicians that wagered they can kick the can down the road, and not have to be the ones that will foot the bill. And they have indeed won that bet for decades, and now we have to face the fact that we have half a century of work to catch up with.

Or maybe, which is more likely, we will do our best to forget the problem, and carry on based on vibes as usual.

Re:Are Wars Blurring Lines…

By korgitser • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That’s one way to put it, if quite the understatement.

Those who exported the US manufacturing base got insanely rich off of it, unfathomably rich. In doing this they were supported by bipartisan policy, and the government ran the PR campaign for them.

To add to what was already for all practical purposes selling the country for scrap, China was also smart enough to demand technology transfer as part of the deal. So not only were they handed the factories, the exporters taught them everything they knew about technology and manufacturing.

I cannot think of a single example in the whole written history that can hold a candle to the level of stupid this was. The US handed it’s leadership role in the world to China on a silver platter, and all of DC and Wall Street cheered on on it, just so that a handful of rich assholes could become even more rich.

I cannot think of a single example in the whole written history that can hold a candle to the level of smart this was. Not in a thousand years does an opportunity like this present itself to anyone, and China recognized it and took it, and understood the level of greed and stupid in the US leadership, and bought the whole country for lunch money, kitchen sink included.

New DNA Tech Identifies Soldier Killed in America’s Revolution in 1780

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
South Carolina’s pine forests “have spent centuries hiding a secret as old as America itself,” reports CBS News:
In August 1780, British and American soldiers clashed there, leading to a terrible defeat for the Continental army [fighting for the 13 colonies rebelling against England]. Battlefield archaeologists Jim Legg and Steve Smith have been studying the site for decades, but recently, they made a shocking discovery: The sandy soil was home to several sets of remains buried in shallow graves. Metal buttons suggested the men had been Continental soldiers, but there was no other identification… About 2,000 Continental soldiers were killed, wounded or captured, and some men never returned home.

Their families could only guess at their fates. But Legg and Smith’s discovery, paired with an explosion in DNA technology, is changing what’s possible. A set of remains, previously known only as 9B, has been identified as John Pumphrey, a young man from Maryland who enlisted in the Continental Army’s 7th Maryland Regiment as young as 13…

Pumphrey likely marched more than a thousand miles with the regiment. The unit fought in battles with then-Gen. George Washington in New Jersey and Pennsylvania… The Pumphrey family still exists today. The DNA that helped identify Pumphrey’s remains came from three women: Pam Donahue, Karen Pumphrey Etchison, and Nancy Pumphrey White… In late June, members of the extended Pumphrey family came together to hear his story and say his name for the first time in centuries. His remains are interred in South Carolina, where he and the other soldiers were discovered, but the tombstone, once marked “Unknown,” will soon have his name carved on it.

Dupe stories aren’t enough on the modern Slashdot

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 3 Thread

What’s the deal nowadays where Slashdot stories repeat exact duplicate blocks of text two - or sometimes even three - times? This isn’t the first (or second, or third, or fourth…) time we’ve seen this during the past year or so.

Are they always editor-created stories (versus voted up in the Firehose)? Or, are they always stories submitted by one particular Slashdotter?

I know it’s been de rigueur for many years to pick on Slashdot’s editing, or lack of it… but recently the quality has somehow dropped even further - it’s at an absurdly bad level now.

Re: When you can’t be bothered to cut and pa

By dwater • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Have…

842,000 American Households Lost Power Today During a Heatwave

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
As America began celebrating its 250th birthday Saturday, 842,000 homes reported power outages, notes ABC News. Figures from tracking site PowerOutage showed states in America’s Northeast and Midwest were impacted by severe weather and extreme heat.
That number, which will fluctuate throughout the day as crews work to restore power, is for households, meaning that the number of people impacted by these outages is likely to be much larger… Millions of Americans, however, will be contending with a heatwave that is blanketing much of the country, including in Philadelphia where the Salute to Independence Semiquincentennial Parade that had been set for Friday was canceled due to the dangerous heat wave, according to Philadelphia ABC station WPVI. Elsewhere, America’s Independence Day Parade, which was scheduled for 10:30 a.m. on July 4 in downtown Washington, D.C. was canceled by organizers late Friday evening due to the extreme heat in the District of Columbia… Amtrak announced it will be canceling a number of trains due to heat-related conditions.
The outages seemed to last throughout the day, with 790,103 household outages still in effect by 4:30 p.m. EST. Ironically, the power outages hit several American states that were among the country’s original 13 freedom-declaring colonies, including New Jersey (143,072 outages), Pennsylvania (40,944 outages), and Virginia (27,392 outages).

CNBC adds that America’s largest power grid operator said Friday “it was under a federal alert to cut electricity consumption across its territory as it battled generator outages, massive overloading on its transmission lines and a surge in air conditioning use from prolonged sweltering heat.”
PJM said it told utilities to reduce electricity to customers who are under contract to reduce consumption during emergencies. PJM serves 67 million people in the Mid-Atlantic, South and Washington, D.C., area. Spot wholesale electricity prices in northern Virginia, home to the largest collection of data centers in the world, have surged beyond $2,000 per megawatt hour this week. That compares to about $40 per MWh when PJM is not in distress.

Re:Nuclear is a dead and dangerous technology

By Jeremi • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This is as bad as Europeans crowing about “free” healthcare or higher education. It’s not free. They paid for it with their tax euros.

…and wouldn’t it be nice to get something in return for our tax dollars? Other than billion-dollar ballrooms and pointless wars, I mean?

Re:Power infrastructure

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Power went out during a sunny day during peak demand. This isn’t a base load problem, so throw some solar panels and wind turbines down. Takes about 1/10th the time to install and 1/20th the capital. Let’s be efficient in how we build our infrastructure, but also do it in a timely manner.

I would rather build more high-voltage direct current (HVDC) that criss-cross the nation and provide a more durable backbone that also enables the trading of energy between large regions undergoing weather related demand. This is going to be a bigger bang for the buck than a handful of nuclear reactors, as those reactor sites will mostly be at existing sites and won’t include the infrastructure improvements necessary to deliver the additional power out of their region.

And please don’t build modular mini reactors. They cost more to operator overall and produce an exponentially higher amount of radioactive waste. As components wear tends to be high and those worn components become low-grade waste. It’s also a Square-Cube law problem, in that a smaller vessel has more surface area for its volume. Every surface is an opportunity for contamination. For the most part, these modular reactors are an investment scam. They have some limited industrial utility, but you shouldn’t bother installing one within 50 miles of a major metropolitan area, as there are far better solutions. (better = safer, cheaper, faster, cleaner)

Re:Power infrastructure

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

AI companies have been caught lying to investors on numerous occasions. More regulation on data centers is the right action, not less.

In principle, a nation should not permit the private ownership of vital infrastructure. Such as the national grid or large scale power generators. Privatizing everything is a way for corporations to conceal everything, and pass their costs onto consumers and taxpayers. Public transparency of vital infrastructure ought to be a goal for any society, but there are some wrong-headed weirdos that scream “communism” any time we want to look at their books.

Re:Power infrastructure

By NewtonsLaw • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The peak demand comes — right at the time we’d be getting near-peak from solar.

Why isn’t the USA focusing more on having people fit solar to their houses with a battery and inverter. This would take the load off the grid during these peak-sun/peak-demand periods and sure-up the grid.

This is one of the few times that the output of renewables tracks demand so why not?

China burns 11x the coal, CO2 up 38%.

By drnb • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

But Trump says Americans need to put coal first

This isn’t China. The US President cannot command industry to use coal, as Xi Jinping and the CCP do in China. US industry has been moving away from coal for about 70 years.

You can misrepresent the stats by only looking at coal for electrical power generation, rather than total coal use.
You can misrepresent the stats by citing 2 anomalies of new coal plants, while China is building many new coal plants.
The fact remains the US long trend is moving away from coal, the Chinese long term and ongoing trend is to burn as much coal as they can dig up and import.

The stats speak for themselves. 4.83 billion tons of coal burned for China and 0.42 for the USA. CO2 emissions for China up 38% over a 12 year period, down 13%.

"[2026 March 26] Despite being a renewables superpower, China continues to permit and build new coal-fired power plants at a rapid pace. Analysts say the nation’s new five-year plan will ensure further coal plant expansion and jeopardize China’s ability to deliver on its climate promises.
In 2021, China’s leader Xi Jinping made two important promises intended to signal China‘s commitment to fighting climate change. At the Leaders Climate Summit in that April, he announced that China would “strictly control” coal generation until 2025 when it would start to gradually phase it out. He also pledged that year that China would reduce the energy intensity of its economy — the amount of CO2 used to produce a unit of GDP — to 65 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. This month, as China unveiled its plans for the next five years, both promises appeared to be in trouble.
The 15th Five-Year Plan offered a chance to correct these negative trends and get China’s climate ambitions back on track, but it is an opportunity the government appears to have missed … Instead, they changed the way they calculate energy intensity, perhaps to disguise the failure to meet Xi’s target, and set a looser ambition for the next five years. "
https://e360.yale.edu/features…

"[2026 Feb 10] Despite media and other reports that China is into “green energy,” the country is still using coal to power its economy, with about 80 to 100 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity added in 2025. The Statistical Review of World Energy reports that coal accounted for 58% of China’s primary energy consumption in 2024, with fossil fuels accounting for a whopping 88%. Coal also provided 58% of China’s electricity generation in 2024. While a report by Ember indicates that populous developing countries like China and India “led the charge in adding more renewable energies” in the first half of 2025, their generation shares show that coal is still king in these countries, and their coal-fired capacity additions indicate that coal will continue to power their economies for the foreseeable future.
The Statistical Review of World Energy reports that coal accounted for 58% of China’s primary energy consumption in 2024. Oil was at 20% and natural gas at 10%. That means that 88% of China’s energy came from fossil fuels. Carbon-free energy (nuclear, hydroelectric, solar, wind, and most other renewables) only provided 12%. Since 2000, China has more than tripled its coal consumption and now uses more coal than the rest of the world’s combined usage, burning 56% of the world’s coal. As Doomberg points out, China consumes almost 20 times the combined consumption of coal by the 27 member states of the European Union, based on 2024 data.
In 2024, China released 11,173 million metric tons of carbon dioxide — 31.5% of the world’s total. That was about 4.5 times as much as the European Union and almost 2.5 times the amount that the United States released.
China produced 57.8% of its electricity from coal and

Did Microsoft Shift Its Profits to Low-Tax Countries?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is apparently shifting its profits to countries with low taxes — and out of countries where they have many more employees and significant sales. Back in 2005 Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer even said that a low corporate tax rate “is part of the overall advantage of doing business in Ireland,” remembers long-time Slashdot reader theodp. (Ballmer added “It would be disingenuous to say otherwise.”)

But in 2026 the EU now requires a country-by-country compliance report, and the New York Times notes that Microsoft “was most likely the first major U.S. technology company to make a so-called country by country report of its finances to comply…”
Like other big companies, Microsoft uses transactions between subsidiaries to shift profits around to reduce its tax bill. The report revealed a consistent pattern: high returns in low-tax jurisdictions and slim margins in higher-tax ones. The report showed the sometimes absurd results. Microsoft said it had generated almost 40 percent of its pretax income in tax-friendly Ireland, where it employed about 3 percent of its global work force. In higher-tax Germany, the largest economy in Europe, Microsoft earned barely half of 1 percent of its global profits, it said.

Excluding Ireland, the company said, it generated less than 2 percent of its worldwide pretax earnings in Europe… [In Luxembourg Microsoft said it had $283 million in pretax income with only 34 employees.]

[America’s] Internal Revenue Service is challenging profit-shifting transactions used by Microsoft, and is seeking back taxes of nearly $29 billion4. The company has said it disagrees with the I.R.S. and said in a securities filing that it “will vigorously contest” the proposed tax bills.
This week a Microsoft blog post offered their own "context,” arguing that tax is “one important measure of contribution, but it is not the only one.

“Our investments, partnerships, infrastructure, and long-term presence in countries around the world also reflect a commitment to helping strengthen the economies and communities where we operate, today and for the future.”

Does a bear do something in the woods?

By shanen • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Gosh, I hate to feel like I’m put in the position of trying to defend a corporate cancer, even if the fine people of Microsoft have tried a little to mend a few of their evil ways, but I cannot pass by the low hanging fruit. Of COURSE they did it. You know they did it, and some more besides. (With apologies to Flip…) But they had to do it or they would have been crushed or acquired or worse by some bigger and meaner, dare I say more evil, corporate cancer that did a better job of retaining its earnings by using tax dodges.

I think there may be a root of the problem: When any dimension becomes too dominant, then the system tends to collapse along that dimension. Profit uber alles destroys everything in its path.

Solutions? A progressive tax on monopoly profits? Naw, that trick will never work. (With apologies to Rocky…)

Unfair on SMEs

By labnet • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Running a business with $15M turnover, we are not big enough to take advantage of big business shenanigans.
It peeves me off no end, that I pay 30% tax on profits while big multinationals spirit their profits off tax shelters.
I don’t mind paying the tax, as you need tax to provide for a modern society. I’m peeved multinationals are allowed to engage in tax fraud.

Re:Unfair on SMEs

By PPH • Score: 5, Funny Thread

“I want either less corruption. Or more opportunity to engage in it.”

Re:Dimensional collapse is a good thing?

By david.emery • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

According to a friend who understands the math, category theory is quite useful for dimensions. There is an interesting article that argues for a Standard Unit for value: https://www.iqiipi.com/the-eig… I don’t know who this (anonymous) author is, but all of the essays on this website are VERY insightful. (I particularly like the one on Agile and the one on ‘bugs’. The one on Ada has a few minor errors, but generally gets it very right.)

Re: Unfair on SMEs

By OrangeTide • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

If it is done fairly it isn’t corruption. It’s the self dealing and big enough to avoid consequences that is the problem

FSF Shares Update on ‘LibrePhone’ and New Automated Site Monitoring Tool

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
At the end of 2025, the FSF launched LibrePhone project, which is working to “better understand and reverse-engineer the nonfree blobs used by a great majority of (if not all) system on a chip designs available today.” The FSF’s summer newsletter shares this update:
We started with researching the proprietary files in Android phones supported by the Lineage project, an Android-based volunteer-led mobile phone operating system with much free software already in it. Our current, primary focus is on the radio blobs that control WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, and cellular communications.

The software freedom issues with mobile computing have been around for a long time, with the most challenging issue being the baseband/modem firmware that relies heavily on proprietary software. This creates a technical and legal maze that is nearly impossible to break free from, but that doesn’t mean we should ever stop working to create free systems. It certainly doesn’t mean we shouldn’t liberate the software that we know can be free software. Now, half a year into this project, lead developer Rob Savoye has extracted firmware from over 200 Lineage install packages, processed 85GB of files, and imported the results of these analyses into a PostgreSQL database for cross-device comparison… [M]uch of the software and blobs we need to work through are shared across multiple devices; this means even greater strides for mobile phone freedom…

As insurmountable as it may seem at times, every blob we manage to free up will be progress. The FSF has proven time and time again that it can bring the free software philosophy to life, not just by advocating for it, but by making it so.
The bulletin also describes how waves of botnets from “aggressive LLM scrapers, vulnerability scanners, poorly optimized CI/CD servers” inspired the FSF to create a new free-as-in-freedom automated monitoring tool:
In our efforts to combat the botnets, we optimized several detection rules to ban abusive behavior. We found the upper limit of fail2ban and replaced it with reaction, an efficient alternative with our configuration that uses ipset. We also split several monolithic machines into many separate machines so that when a web service is overwhelmed the other functions of the service do not go down with it… We found quite a few ways to respond to and prevent botnet attacks, but still faced a significant related challenge: communicating when a website or service is down…

Uptime Kuma is a human-readable, automated monitoring addition to our systems… You can check out our recently-launched self-hosted Uptime Kuma instance at https://status.fsf.org/. When you see the page, you will also likely say, “Wow! The FSF and GNU sure do run a ton of services!” and you would be right… If you maintain websites and services, and are looking for a simple way to communicate publicly with your users, consider using Uptime Kuma or another free software solution instead of choosing a proprietary monitoring solution.”
There’s also an article on the state of free-as-in-freedom videogame console emulators.

These mini-reactors and Mars colonies

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 3, Funny Thread
will beat any type of FSF-made phone to the market.

FSF is back at it again

By Artem S. Tashkinov • Score: 3 Thread

Built-in blobs are “OK”, updateable blobs are “bad”.

BTW, both are black boxes.

I wonder if this fear mongering is profitable or something, because I’ve long lost the plot.

AOL’s Owner Bending Spoons Hits Wall Street with $1.7 billion IPO

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“The owner of AOL and other tech businesses hit Wall Street with a $1.7 billion initial public offering Wednesday,” reports the Associated Press:
The company is getting $1 billion in proceeds, while the rest is going to shareholders. The stock surged 39.7% in its first day of trading under the symbol “BSP” on the Nasdaq, giving it a market value of $25.2 billion.

Among the company’s well-known holdings are the event creation and ticketing company Eventbrite, and the video hosting service Vimeo… AOL itself went public in 1992 and was a vanguard of technology and communication. It reached a market value of $164 billion in 2000 shortly before merging with Time Warner. It then crashed along with the rest of the industry following the bursting of the dot-com bubble. It has been bought and sold several times over the last two decades…

[Italy-based Bending Spoons] was founded by three friends in 2013 following the failure of their first attempt at building a technology startup. It has since grown by buying more than 50 companies. The acquired companies are reorganized, and AI technology is often a key tool in the redesign. The focus remains on subscription-based revenue from the portfolio of businesses. The company said it had net income of $27.5 million on revenue of $601 million during the first three months of 2026. It had more than 500 million monthly active users and 9 million monthly paying customers as of March. The company has debt of just under $4.4 billion. It plans to use proceeds from the offering to invest in new acquisitions.
The article notes that in the company’s prospectus, it says they chose the name Bending Spoons because “We were about to attempt to create a world-class company with $40,000, a team of five, and a track record that read 0 for 1. A touch of irony seemed appropriate.”

They’re garbage

By quonset • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

May dad lost access to his AOL email 2 months ago, and every phone call and every email exchange I’ve had with them since has been the exact same script. In short, he’s being asked to verify who he is, even though he’s never had to do so in the decade he’s been with them, but there’s nothing to verify against. One guy said he reviewed the case, and said from time-to-time people need to verify themselves. He couldn’t have reviewed anything because he’s the same guy who asked me to send a screenshot of what my dad is seeing. He would have known what the situation is. I’m fairly convinced it’s some agentic AI being used because it’s difficult to comprehend something being this stupid.

I can’t even call them incompetent. Incompetence implies something was tried and done poorly. Nothing has been done. Zero. They’re nothing but a bunch of script kiddies reading the same words over and over, never doing anything.

Goldman Sachs International, J.P. Morgan, and Allen & Company didn’t do their due diligence. Whatever “metrics” they were looking at, they failed to look at the most important: how companies treat their customers. Not that they care. They got their money, so they’re happy. It’s the investors who will be unhappy as people leave this shit show.

Buyer beware. If a company can’t fix a problem they created, you don’t want them.

Re:Junkyard of Tech Failures = BSP

By linuxguy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

> Wall Street is going to barf this IPO out faster than a cat’s wet hairball!

I am not so sure. We appear to be in a strange bubble. Currently, many garbage producing companies are worth more than companies producing real value.

Re:Junkyard of Tech Failures = BSP

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Funny Thread

The only Bending of Spoons that’ll happen is from heaving all that AI slop enshittified excrement coming out of the BSP bunghole that these companies are producing.

There is no spoon.

EchoStar’s US Satellite Pay-TV Provider Dish DBS Files for Bankruptcy

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
EchoStar’s satellite pay-TV unit Dish DBS has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, reports Reuters. The move also applies to its wireless subsidiaries, according to the article, and “facilitates the wind-down of Dish Wireless’s 5G network operations following an unexpected delay in a spectrum license sale to AT&T… under which EchoStar agreed to sell about 50 megahertz of its nationwide spectrum for $23 billion.”

Some context from Deadline.com:
Charlie Ergen, who co-founded EchoStar and Dish, recently returned as chairman and CEO to steer the company through its recent challenges… Even prior to the merger, Ergen had been working to pivot from the pay-TV business, where Dish now has just 5 million subscribers and streaming sibling Sling TV has another 2 million, toward wireless telecom. With wireless spectrum hitting the market due to the Sprint-T-Mobile merger and then Elon Musk’s Starlink looking to ramp up in the sector, it seemed more attractive than the cord-cutting-ravaged pay-TV business. But it is still entails plenty of risk, especially given how tightly regulated the spectrum is due to security concerns.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the news.

Decades-Old Bash Tricks Expose AI Coding Agents To Supply Chain Attacks

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slashdot reader wiredmikey writes:
AI security researchers have uncovered a structural security flaw dubbed GuardFall that allows decades-old Bash shell tricks to bypass safeguards in most open source AI coding agents. By exploiting shell behaviors such as quote removal and variable expansion, attackers can hide malicious commands in repositories, README files, Makefiles, or other content consumed by AI agents. If executed — particularly in auto-approve or CI environments—the commands can steal credentials, compromise developer systems, or enable software supply chain attacks. According to researchers at Adversa AI, the 11 popular open source AI coding agents tested, only one successfully blocked all of the Bash trick techniques.

Attitude

By glum64 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
In my exerience, the share of programmers that (a) understand that shell is a programming language and not some weird command prompt, and (b) take the time and invest the effort required to learn it properly is surprisingly small.

Re:cat food

By commodore73 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
“That command is a classic example of a fork bomb.

What it does

When executed in a POSIX-compliant shell (like Bash), this command causes the system to rapidly consume all available resources by creating an exponential number of processes until the system crashes or becomes completely unresponsive.

Breakdown of the syntax

Here is how that cryptic string is interpreted by the shell:

:(): This defines a function named :.

{ … }: This defines the body of the function.

:|:: This calls the function : and pipes its output to another instance of the function :.

&: This puts the function call into the background, so the parent process doesn’t wait for it to finish.

;: This terminates the function definition.

:: This final character executes the function for the first time, triggering the cycle.

Essentially, the function calls itself twice, and because it runs in the background, each call continues to spawn more copies of itself uncontrollably.

Important Warning

Do not run this command on your computer.

If you execute this, your system will likely become unresponsive, requiring a hard reboot to clear the process table and recover. On many modern Linux distributions, there are default security limits (ulimit) in place that prevent a single user from spawning enough processes to crash the entire system, but it is still highly inadvisable to test it.”

What ????

By jmccue • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

1989 GNU rewrite of the original Linux Bourne Shell

After reading this line at the start of the article, I stopped reading. For people with their heads in the sand, Linux did not exist in 1989, inconceivable.

Re:Attitude

By gweihir • Score: 4 Thread

The thing is, most coders and other IT people stay in their narrow area and do not look out. Hence you get coders with no clue about system administration, networking and security. You get “security experts” that cannot code or do system administration or anything really (and are hence basically worthless). You get sysadmins that cannot do shell scripting (or any coding), which is completely pathetic.

This is a result from the immaturity of the IT field: No qualification requirements, no liability, no long-term technological stability and hence no real standard approaches and anybody can claim to be an expert on anything. And hence a lot of things are brittle as fuck, hard to use, hard to maintain, insecure and unreliable.

What Is a Quantum Computer Good For? Absolutely Nothing - Yet

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Verge argues that researchers “have made genuine progress in quantum computing — it’s just been largely incremental and too esoteric to immediately capture the public’s imagination.”

And there are predictions that quantum computers will finally do something useful as soon as 2028:
The drama can overshadow the real progress in quantum computing… Researchers have improved the qubits themselves, so they hold onto information longer. When they hold onto information longer, you can fit in more operations and do more complicated algorithms. Last November, Andrew Houck of Princeton University and his colleagues reported that they’d made a superconducting qubit that can hold onto information three times longer than the previous record holder… And in the last two years, researchers have made substantial strides in what’s known as quantum error correction… In addition, researchers have developed algorithms to correct errors while the quantum computer operates… Microsoft claimed, which experts dispute, that it made an object made of electrons known as a Majorana particle [which should make fewer errors and be easier to scale up]…

“We 100 percent stand behind our results. We stand by our roadmap,” Microsoft’s quantum lead, Chetan Nayak, responded in an interview with The Verge. In an email statement, he added that Microsoft’s “papers do show that we are creating and controlling Majorana [particles]… Microsoft’s supporting evidence is unconvincing [according to [Henry Legg, a physicist from the University of St. Andrews and a longtime Microsoft critic]Rnqyq. What it claimed as evidence of a Majorana particle, he says, could actually be due to quantum dots forming in its device. Quantum dots are electron-containing objects that are not useful for Microsoft’s quantum computer. It also bases its claim on data from a single device, says Legg. He wants to see Microsoft replicate the results in multiple chips. “If you repeatedly try and find Jesus in your toast, eventually you’ll find Jesus in your toast,” he says. “But that one piece of toast doesn’t mean you had some kind of epiphany.”

“While we appreciate the religious fervor, our data maintains the strength and consistency of our roadmap, as we have for the past several years across previous milestones. We look forward to delivering the world’s first quantum machine and sharing the energy of our achievements with the world,” wrote Nayak in response.

Past spurious work from Microsoft-affiliated researchers adds to the doubt. In 2021, the journal Nature retracted an article from Microsoft-affiliated researchers in which they’d claimed strong experimental evidence that they’d created a Majorana particle.
“Even hopeful experts have varying opinions about when a quantum computer will demonstrate something useful,” the article acknowledges.

But quantum computing lecturer Eleanor Crane of King’s College London predicts researchers will have demonstrated a useful scientific simulation on a quantum computer by 2028.

Thanks to Slashdot reader joshuark for sharing the article.

Absolutely Nothing

By crunchy_one • Score: 3 Thread
Quantum computing
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!!!
Say it again…

Re:Another scam?

By XXongo • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

…What if AI eventually leads us to agents of average human intelligence? …

Then all the average humans are out of work. And there probably isn’t enough need for above-average intelligence humans to keep all that many working.

The economy, as we currently run it, ceases to function when unemployment exceeds 50%.

The “yet” is massively overstating it

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

No idea why people keep maintaining that delusion that they will eventually get there. All evidence is pointing in the other direction. But I guess people are just not living in reality.

The non-physics-experiment part is essentially a “constant delivery scam”. I mean, they do have a faked (“compiled” Shor’s algorithm) factorization of 12 and 21 After something like 40 years of research. There is really no rational reason to expect anything at this time or in the foreseeable future. The physics experiment aspect is interesting, so I would like to keep that funded, on academic level. The idea that it will produce a QC has to die though. All that idea is doing is exposing the delulus. And there are a lot of those.

Startup Targets Datacenters With 3D-Printed Nuclear Reactor Module

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Startup Ampera has unveiled what it calls the first 3D-printed nuclear reactor module, built around a silicon-carbide core and pressure vessel designed for a thorium-based microreactor. The company says future systems could deliver 15 or 30 megawatts for up to 30 years without refueling. When The Register asked about availability, their spokesperson said: “We expect the power generation portion of the system to be available as early as 2027, with the nuclear module being available to customers about 2030 based on regulatory approval.” From the report:
Founder and CEO Brian Matthews revealed the prototype microreactor, which features a fully 3D-printed silicon carbide reactor core and pressure vessel. “This next-generation nuclear core and pressure vessel sets the foundation for factory-built, mass-produced nuclear energy,” Matthews said. “The advanced technology and additive manufacturing used demonstrate a clear commercial path for new nuclear technology coming to market in an accelerated manner.” His company is developing a subcritical, solid-state, factory-built thorium-based nuclear reactor. Subcritical means the fuel cannot sustain a nuclear chain reaction on its own, which prevents a runaway power excursion.

Ampera uses “solid-state” to describe a design with solid rather than liquid fuel. The proposed fuel uses tristructural isotropic, or TRISO, particles, consisting of a fuel kernel containing thorium, surrounded by multiple ceramic and carbon layers. […] “Thorium is the future for ultra-safe, clean power production,” Matthews said at the time. “By producing TRISO thorium kernels in the United States, we can ensure ample access to the needed fuel supply as we scale up and also minimize price volatility risk.”

Ampera also describes the heart of the reactor as as a spherical monolithic gyroid core. A gyroid, as far as we can fathom, is a complex shape that provides a massive surface area relative to its volume, making it well-suited for heat transfer. Its complexity makes it difficult to produce using conventional manufacturing methods, which is where additive manufacturing comes in. The core is 3D-printed using silicon carbide and designed to operate for up to 30 years without refueling, the firm claims. Ampera says its planned systems will provide 15 or 30 MWe, depending on the configuration, enough to supply a typical datacenter. Larger configurations are planned. Matthews said that his company expects to be the first to industrialize factory-built nuclear power with near-term deployment timelines.

Investor Fishing

By SlashbotAgent • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

This sounds like investor fishing. I’ll check back in 10 years.

Nuke Them From Orbit

By crunchy_one • Score: 3 Thread
Targeting AI data centers sounds like a great idea. Using nukes might be a bit excessive, but it will get the job done.

Re:I’ll take that!

By sound+vision • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

They included their out right in the quote, “Based on regulatory approval”.

It’s also useful to consider, the public are the ones theoretically regulating everything. Sometimes even in practice, when it comes to these data centers. If the bros are having trouble with NIMBY just because of the cooling units, imagine how much trouble they’ll have when they add nukes into the picture.

I’d love to see more nukes built, but the right way. Not for this bullshit.

Silicon Carbide is a good target

By drinkypoo • Score: 3 Thread

Silicon Carbide is difficult to work with due to the high temperatures required, so if they have a 3d printing process that is effective at producing the kind of quality needed for a reactor vessel, that’s what’s really interesting here. Or… whose tech are they using?