Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Predicts Humankind Won’t Survive Another 50 Years
  2. Is the Iran War Driving a Surge of Interest in Electric Cars?
  3. Pancreatic Cancer MRNA Vaccine Shows Lasting Results In Early Trial
  4. Motorola Sues Social Media Platforms and Creators in India
  5. Nevada Police Can Now Track Cellphones Without a Warrant
  6. HP Will Discontinue ‘HP Anyware’ Remote Desktop, Trusted Zero Clients
  7. Disney Creates Its Own IMAX for ‘Avengers: Doomsday’ After Losing Screens to ‘Dune: Part 3’
  8. Can the ‘Attention Liberation Movement’ Foment a Rebellion Against Screens?
  9. Remembering Zip Drives - the Trendy Storage Technology of the 1990s
  10. Duolingo CEO Says They’ve Stopped Tracking Employees’ AI Use for Performance Reviews
  11. SpaceX, Blue Origin Compete For ‘Artemis III’ Mission
  12. New Movie Trailer Shows First AI-Generated Performance By a Major Star: the Late Val Kilmer
  13. Old Cars ‘Tell Tales’ by Storing Data That’s Never Wiped
  14. Fewer US College Students Major in CS. More Choose Data Science, Engineering
  15. US Congress Fails to Pass Long-Term FISA Extension, Authorizes It Through April 30

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Predicts Humankind Won’t Survive Another 50 Years

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Live Science spoke with physicist David Gross, who today received the $3 million “Special Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics”. He was part of a trio that won the 2004 physics Nobel prize for research that helped complete the Standard Model of particle physics. But when asked if physics will reach a unified theory of the fundamental forces of nature within 50 years, Gross has a surprising answer. “Currently, I spend part of my time trying to tell people… that the chances of you living 50 [more] years are very small.”

Cold War estimates for a 1% chance of nuclear war each year seem low, Gross says. “The chances are more likely 2%. So that’s a 1-in-50 chance every year.”
David Gross: The expected lifetime, in the case of 2% [per year], is about 35 years. [The expected lifetime is the average time it would take to have had a nuclear war by then. It is calculated using similar equations as those used to determine the “half-life” of a radioactive material.]

Live Science: So what do you suggest as remedies to lower that risk?

Gross: We had something called the Nobel Laureate Assembly for reducing the risk of nuclear war in Chicago last year. There are steps, which are easy to take — for nations, I mean. For example, talk to each other. In the last 10 years, there are no treaties anymore. We’re entering an incredible arms race.

We have three super nuclear powers. People are talking about using nuclear weapons; there’s a major war going on in the middle of Europe; we’re bombing Iran; India and Pakistan almost went to war. OK, so that’s increased the chance [of nuclear war]. I would really like to have a solid estimate — it might be more, and I think I’m being conservative — but a 2% estimate [of nuclear war] in today’s crazy world.

Live Science: Do you think we’ll ever get to a place where we get rid of nuclear weapons?

Gross: We’re not recommending that. That’s idealistic, but yes, I hope so. Because if you don’t, there’s always some risk an AI 100 years from now [could launch nuclear weapons], but chances of [humanity] living, with this estimate, 100 years, is very small, and living 200 years is infinitesimal. So [the answer to] Fermi’s question of “Where are the civilizations, all the intelligent organisms around the galaxy, and why don’t they talk to us?” is that they’ve killed themselves…

There are now nine nuclear powers. Even three is infinitely more complicated than two. The agreements, the norms between countries, are all falling apart. Weapons are getting crazier. Automation, and perhaps even AI, will be in control of those instruments pretty soon… It’s going to be very hard to resist making AI make decisions because it acts so fast.
He points out that with the threat of climate change, “people have done something,” even though “It’s a much harder argument to make than about nuclear weapons.

“We made them; we can stop them.”

Thanks to hwstar (Slashdot reader #35,834) for sharing the article.

Nothing new

By DrMrLordX • Score: 3 Thread

Hasn’t the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists been making similar predictions for decades now?

Re:Auto Mechanic doesn’t like latest symphony

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I mean to be fair predicting the human race is going to end within 50 years isn’t exactly amazing Kreskin territory.

We put a has been game show host with a long history of crimes and rapes and pedophilia in charge of the largest nuclear arsenal on the planet and he tried to invade another country, made a fool of himself and his country, and he is still polling at over 40%.

Meanwhile half the planet thinks the world is less than 10,000 years old and that climate change is a hoax by big science.

I don’t see how we make it out of that kind of a mess. If we didn’t have nukes sure. But sooner or later some religious lunatic is going to get their grubby little paws on those things and it’s game over.

Is the Iran War Driving a Surge of Interest in Electric Cars?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In October and through November, America’s EV sales reached their lowest point since 2022 after government subsidies expired, remembers Time. “But first-quarter data for 2026 shows that used EV sales were 12% higher than the same time last year and 17% higher than the previous quarter.

“One factor likely helping push buyers toward these cars is high gas prices, which recently topped $4.00 a gallon for the first time in four years,” they write — but it’s not just in the U.S. Instead, they argue the conflict “is driving a global surge of interest in electric vehicles…”
In the U.K., electric car sales reached a record high, with 86,120 vehicles sold in March… The French online used-car retailer Aramisauto reported its share of EV sales nearly doubled from February 16 to March 9, rising to 12.7% from 6.5%, while sales of fueled models dropped to 28% of sales from 34%, and sales of diesel models dropped to 10% from 14%. Germany’s largest online car market, mobile.de, told Reuters that the share of EV searches on its website has tripled since the start of March — from 12% to 36%, with car dealers receiving 66% more enquiries for used EVs than in February.

South Korea reported that registrations for electric vehicles more than doubled in March compared to the prior year, due in part to rising fuel prices and government subsidies… In New Zealand, more than 1,000 EVs were registered in the week that ended on March 22, close to double the week before, making it the country’s biggest week for electric vehicle registrations since the end of 2023, according to the country’s Transport Minister, Chris Bishop.
In America, Bloomberg also reports 605 high-speed EV charging stations switched on in just the first three months of 2025, “a 34% increase over the year-earlier period,” according to their analysis of federal data. A data platform focused on EV infrastructure tells Bloomberg that speedier and more reliable chargers are convincing more drivers to go electric and use public plugs.

Not sure, we’ve been all electric over 2 years

By molarmass192 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

There is zero chance I’d go back to an ICE car. The maintenance, reliability, and fuel costs are not even comparable. The math behind driving an ICE car today only makes sense if you need to tow large loads for significant distances. The caveat is that you need a place to charge them for it to be stress-free. We calculated not long ago that it would take $0.25/gallon gas to make an ICE car break even with what we’re spending on EVs.

Re:Not sure, we’ve been all electric over 2 years

By AlanObject • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I’ve been driving a Model Y since 2019 and I also will never go back as well. The cost calculation for me does not seem to work out quite as well as what you are reporting, but it is an improvement over ICE, mostly over maintenance issues. Not ever having to go to the gas station is a big plus all by itself.

Even if there were no economic advantage I will still go the EV route. They are just better cars. Five years in it is hard to tell my car from a new one, they are so easy to drive, no vibration and never any hassle accelerating when it is convenient to do so.

That said, if you are looking at $5-10/gal of gas you have to be thinking about it. In some parts of Europe the cost is as much as twice that.

Re:Same as it ever was

By XopherMV • Score: 5, Informative Thread
I’ve driven EVs since 2016. I’ve only plugged my car into the wall with no special charger. I plug in when I get home. My car completely charges overnight. When I leave in the morning, it’s completely charged. My office is only about 10 miles away. So, I never use a full charge during the day driving to work.

It’s clear you’ve never owned an EV and simply want to demonize a technology it’s obvious you know little about.

Re:Same as it ever was

By PsychoSlashDot • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Short sighted idiots and people trying to justify “I want a new car” that they clearly can’t afford will “justify” it with fuel savings or lower operating costs. It almost never works out. Nothing to see here. The same thing happens literally every time fuel costs spike.

There’s nothing in the summary that supports that holier-than-thou take.

That enquiries and sales of EVs have increased does not imply or require that people are buying cars when they weren’t otherwise going to, and doesn’t imply or require that they cannot afford those cars.

You are just painting these buyers as “short-sighted idiots” to make yourself feel superior but there’s nothing presented to support that. What I’m saying is that there were already X people looking to buy new cars. There’s nothing - nothing - here that says overall sales are greater than X, only that the number EV sales, searches, and enquiries are up.

Re:Same as it ever was

By frdmfghtr • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It’s clear you’ve never owned an EV and simply want to demonize a technology it’s obvious you know little about.

The same people usually don’t want to learn either. I know of people for whom an EV would be a perfect fit; local driving only, low annual miles (I’m talking maybe 5k/year)…but claim that “there are too many unknowns” with EVs. The only “unknowns” are the ones you don’t want to learn about.

Pancreatic Cancer MRNA Vaccine Shows Lasting Results In Early Trial

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
NBC News reports on a 16-person clinical trial of "personalized messenger RNA vaccines" which use the immune system to fight cancer cells. “The goal is not to eliminate existing tumors, but instead to stamp out lingering, undetected cancer cells, and later any new cells that form before they can cause a recurrence.”
Patients still have surgery to remove tumors. After that, the mRNA vaccines are personalized for each individual using genetic material taken from their unique tumor cells. In the clinical trial, after getting the vaccine, the patients also received chemotherapy, which is standard post-op treatment for operable pancreatic cancer… [The article notes that less than 13% of people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer live for more than five years, making it “one of the deadliest cancers.”]

[E]xperts have long believed that people with pancreatic cancer could not generate an immune response against tumors. But after nine doses of the personalized vaccine, [clinical trial participant Donna] Gustafson is one of eight people in the 16-person Phase 1 trial who did just that, producing an army of immune cells called T cells that seek out and destroy tumor cells… [Dr. Vinod Balachandran, a vaccine center director who is leading the trial, said] it was unclear whether the immune response would last and lead to the patients living longer… New data collected during the trial’s six-year follow-up period shows that it may. Those findings will be presented Monday at the American Association for Cancer Research’s annual meeting in San Diego. Six years after treatment, Gustafson and six others who responded to the treatment are still alive…

More research is still needed. Genentech and BioNTech, the two drugmakers behind the vaccine, have already launched a larger Phase 2 clinical trial… Another team is working on an off-the-shelf vaccine that targets a protein called KRAS that is present in as many as 90% of pancreatic cancers. In a small, early trial, about 85% of the participants mounted an immune response to the protein.

So… a mRNA cancer treatment, under RFK, Jr?

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3 Thread

Given how much HHS Secretary RFK, Jr. is against mRNA vaccines and is cancelling support and funding for them — Google: RFK mrna cancels — I wonder how he’ll feel about the FDA considering and approving this?

Motorola Sues Social Media Platforms and Creators in India

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Motorola has filed a lawsuit in India against social media platforms and content creators,” reports TechCrunch, “over posts it alleges are defamatory…”
The lawsuit, filed in a Bengaluru court and obtained by TechCrunch, names platforms such as X, YouTube, and Instagram along with dozens of content creators, and seeks takedown of the content as well as broader restraint on what it describes as false or defamatory material related to the company’s devices. In its over 60-page filing, Motorola has sought a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from publishing or sharing what it describes as false or defamatory content about its products, including reviews, videos, comments, and boycott campaigns.

The complaint cites hundreds of posts across platforms, including videos alleging device issues and phones catching fire. But it is also targeting unfavorable product reviews and user commentary that the company alleges are false or defamatory. In a statement after publication, a Motorola spokesperson said it had initiated legal action “in the interest of public safety” against what it described as demonstrably false claims that its devices had exploded or caught fire.
One online creator told TechCrunch “they expect more such legal action in the future, as evolving rules around online content increase liability for creators and platforms — a trend reflected in recently proposed changes to India’s IT rules aimed at tightening oversight of online content.”

A Motorola spokesperson “said the company did not seek to suppress legitimate reviews or criticism and was reviewing the scope of the proceedings, adding that it apologized to creators affected inadvertently.”

The beginning of the end

By ZombieCatInABox • Score: 3 Thread

When your company is already on shaky grounds, you can always count on your legal team to deliver the coup de grâce.

probably backlash

By FudRucker • Score: 3, Informative Thread
Motorola is going to sell a smartphone with GrapheneOS that will take google’s digital umbilical cord out of your phone so the google fanboys in India organized a shitposting campaign.
I will buy one as ASAP when they are released

proof?

By freeze128 • Score: 3 Thread
How does Motorola know that the claims of exploding phones are false? I personally knew someone in the U.S. with a Motorola phone that inexplicably caught fire.Since there are a Billion possible customers in that market, it’s possible that the numbers of faulty phones could be much higher.

Nevada Police Can Now Track Cellphones Without a Warrant

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Nevada quietly signed an agreement earlier this year with a company that collects location data from cellphones, allowing police to track a device virtually in real time,” reports the Associated Press. “All without a warrant.”
The software from Fog Data Science, adopted this January in Nevada through a Department of Public Safety contract, pulls information from smartphone apps in order to let state investigators identify the location of mobile devices. The state is allowed more than 250 queries a month using the tool, which allows officers to track a device’s location over long stretches of time and enables them to see what Fog calls “patterns of life,” according to company documents from 2022. It can help them deduce where and when people work and live, with whom they associate and what places they visit, according to privacy experts… Traditionally, police must obtain a warrant from a judge to access cellphone location information — a process that can take days or weeks. And while cellphone users may be aware that they are sharing their location through apps such as Google Maps, critics say few are aware that such information can make its way to police…

Other agencies in Nevada have been known to use technology similar to Fog. In 2013, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department acquired something known as a cell-site simulator that mimics cellphone towers and can sweep up signals from entire areas to track individuals, with some models capable of intercepting texts and calls. Police have not released detailed information about the technology since then.
“Police in other states have said the technology (and its low price tag) has helped expand investigatory capacity,” the article adds.

But it also points out that Fog Data Science has a web page letting individuals opt out of all their data sets.

A chuckle from Peter Thiel…

By haggie • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Whatever Fog is doing in the relatively open, I assume Palantir is doing 100x worse without anyone knowing about it.

Re:Increasingly, we’re down to one option

By PPH • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Steps can be taken to make casual surveillance by police and other bad actors a little more difficult, such as turning off location services unless you really need them enabled.

Not really. Turning off GPS and location services might “fuzz” your location to a circular error probability of a hundred yards or so. But the cops can still track you using a feed from the telecoms triangulating you within a cell site. I listen to out local cops tactical channels on a scanner and it’s pretty obvious when they can locate a vehicle within a parking lot or an individual down to which business they have entered.

there’s no requirement for your phone and you to always be in the same place.

This. But some people are so attached to their toys they just can’t leave the behind. Or so impulsive that they just knock over convenience stores on a momentary impulse. With phone still in pocket.

Warrant?

By PPH • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Traditionally, police must obtain a warrant

That’s not exactly what the linked page says. That appears to be about searching the content of your phone. Tracking (i.e.your location) is a separate issue.

Cell site emulators/IMSI catchers/Stingrays are also popular, particularly with the feds. Our state has some pretty strict privacy laws. But they mean nothing when it’s the FBI/DoJ setting the sites up. Same for surveillance camera systems. Cities around me are pretty active about giving Flock and others the boot. But the feds operate their own systems, about which local and state governments have no say. And they are pretty well hidden compared to the Flock cameras (which I think are actually going for brand recognition with their obvious installations).

Set Android advertising ID to all zeros

By schwit1 • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This should foil fogs data?

On stock systems, the UUID you are seeing is almost certainly the **Advertising ID** (Android) or **IDFA** (iPhone). Here is how to manage them:

1. **To Reset the ID:** Go to **Settings > Privacy > Ads** (or **Settings > Google > Ads**). Tap **Reset advertising ID**. This generates a completely new random UUID.
2. **To Delete the ID:** In the same menu, tap **Delete advertising ID**.
        * *Result:* Instead of a random string, apps will see a string of zeros (`00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000`). This is effectively “randomizing” it by making it useless for tracking.
3. **Automatic Randomization:** Stock Android does **not** have a native setting to rotate this ID automatically (e.g., daily). Only privacy-focused ROMs like CalyxOS or GrapheneOS offer that “shuffle” behavior.

You could stop voting for right wing politicians

By rsilvergun • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
That seems to be the thing nobody is considering here. All of this crap comes from the right wing because this is about control and that’s what the right wing is always about. If you go all the way back to when the right wing got its start it’s literally the side the monarchists were sitting in at the French assembly.

The fundamental concept that underpins the right wing philosophy is that there is a natural order and hierarchy that we all fit into and that we should obey the people above us and commands the people below us.

With that kind of belief system you’re going to get surveillance because you aren’t going to be able to maintain control otherwise.

HP Will Discontinue ‘HP Anyware’ Remote Desktop, Trusted Zero Clients

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
kriston (Slashdot reader #7,886) writes:
HP Anyware, the new name of the Teradici PCoIP remote desktop solution that was acquired by HP in 2021, is being discontinued.
“Maintenance and support for customers and partners with multi-year terms will continue until 31 October, 2029,” a href=“https://anyware.hp.com/hp-anyware-end-of-life”>according to HP’s announcement.

But HP is also announcing the planned End of Life for Anyware Trust Center and Trusted Zero Clients, with support now limited to setup and troubleshooting, no new updates or patches, and support ending in a little over six months on October 31, 2026. While for Desktop Access customers — Tera2 Zero Clients and PCoIP Management Console — “the previously announced EOL date remains December 31, 2029,” sales have already ended for other customers. HP Anyware renewals are available for purchase through October 31 of 2027, but with a maximum one year term, with support ending October 31, 2028.

HP says the decision “enables us to focus our resources on product categories where we can deliver the greatest customer value and drive long-term innovation.”

Acquire then discontinue

By 0xG • Score: 3 Thread

What a winning strategy. /s
HP is looking more and more like CA.

Monkey See, Monkey Buy Other Monkey’s Copy

By Excelcia • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Monkey See, Monkey Buy Other Monkey’s Copy is not and never has been a winning strategy.

They would have got more value out of a version of VNC.

And HP’s marketspeak that it “enables us to focus our resources on product categories where we can deliver the greatest customer value and drive long-term innovation” - has never, ever fooled anyone.

If you are the one approving a press release, here’s simple advice. If it, anywhere, contains the words “drive”, “deliver”, “value” and/or “innovation”, then immediately send it back. And if it contains more than one, fire the person who brought it to you - that person will never be able to innovate, drive or deliver actual value.

Disney Creates Its Own IMAX for ‘Avengers: Doomsday’ After Losing Screens to ‘Dune: Part 3’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Ahead of December’s release of Avengers: Doomsday, Disney has unveiled “Infinity Vision,” reports Kotaku, which they describe as “a new theater-going experience that will be certain to transform your pedestrian $15 night out into an exotic $43 one.” (Though those prices appear to be estimates…)

Disney’s announcement calls it “a new certification for premium large format (PLF) theaters,” helping ticket-buyers find “a huge screen with the sharpest, clearest color and sound,” including laser projection “for superior brightness and clarity ") and “premium audio formats for fully immersive sound”.
Light on specifics, Disney says they will be certifying premium large format theaters for the Infinity Vision experience, highlighting laser projection and immersive audio quality. The new program will begin in the summer for a theater run of 2019’s Avengers: Endgame ahead of Doomsday‘s holiday release.

Now you might be thinking: Giant screen? Booming audio? That sounds an awful lot like IMAX. The most consumer-recognized premium movie-going screen is the coveted throne for big blockbuster events, from Avatar to One Battle After Another. Unfortunately for Doomsday, IMAX screens are already booked for the holiday season by Dune: Part Three, the anticipated return to Arrakis, where Timothée Chalamet’s Muad’Dib will begin to go worm-mode. Locked out of the popular choice for doubling your ticket price, Disney appears to have made up a new one…

Disney says they aim to certify 75 theaters in the United States and 300 internationally for the Infinity Vision program.

This is exactly why

By wakeboarder • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

I don’t go to the theaters, these movie execs are trying to pick my pocket when they should be trying to entertain me. They put out commercialized uncreative garbage. Most Disney movies contain a large percentage of content that is essentially a in movie advertisement. I could go on and on, I’m not paying 40$ for a movie

Alternate news

By Unpopular Opinions • Score: 3 Thread

Ahead of December’s release of Avengers: Doomsday, Unpopular Opinions has unveiled “Infinity Wisdom,” reports himself, which they describe as “a new theater skipping experience that will be certain to transform corporate greed night out into a realistic better investment for your future.” (Though those claims appear to be estimates…)

Start with Disney+ for Brightness and Clarity

By Somervillain • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Given the horrible HDR on Disney+, hearing Disney talk about brightness and clarity is like hearing Elon Musk lament about drug abuse. Disney+ is largely unwatchable, your screen will be black…unless you turn the brightness all the way up and watch it on a giant TV in a pitch black room. I can’t see fucking shit on Disney+. They ruin the movies. At first I thought it was because I had an inexpensive mainstream TV. I tried disabling HDR, changing the brightness, backlight, all the common sense stuff. Now my TV is grey, but I can’t tell what the fuck is going on for any dimly lit indoors scene (like anything in a space ship). OK…so I buy an expensive TV, not purely for Disney, but just because my kids and I watch movies and play more games together now…OK, for a top of the line $1200 Roku Pro series, it’s “slightly” better, but still…I can’t tell what the fuck is going on in any dark scene. Is that the hero or antagonist?…it takes me a second or 2 figure it out because I can’t see shit.

The crux of the complaint? Disney+ went OUT OF THEIR WAY with this overboard HDR shit on purpose. So Disney wants to “roll their own” theater format for picture?…eh, your history with these thing is pretty horrible, especially on Marvel and Star Wars series. HDR is a fucking curse and everyone I’ve talked to agrees…it definitely didn’t make it better. I know creators can build tension with that, but most of us just want to relax after a busy week and watch a movie. Don’t go out of your way to make strain my eyes and have to put EFFORT into watching your stupid popcorn flick.

This is to entice iMAX franchisees to jump ship

By williamyf • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

If you are a theater owner, you have to pay iMax periodicaly for naming rights, and other stuff. The equipment (that you also had to pay) is sunk cost already.

If Disney can Provide “A Name/Brand” 90% as strong as iMax at 60% of recurring costs, and convince theater owners that is really the case, be certain that many a theater owner will jump ship in a heartbeat.

Competition is good, and a Duopoly is better than a monopoly any day.

On a personal note, there are no iMaxs in my country (Venezuela), and I almost do not go to cinema, but still go from time to time (like once or twice per annum), either for the social aspect, or because there is a movie I REALLY like to see “the way it was meant to be seen”. So, I have no beef in this fight, just seeing it from a bussiness perspective.

Re:This is to entice iMAX franchisees to jump ship

By tlhIngan • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Large format projections beyond IMAX do exist, but the generally have very little hold. Most cinema formats have not held - many have been tested over the decades and most have done away.

Theatre owners will likely not invest in the equipment if there’s no promising market - they’ve been promised a lot in the past and been stuck with equipment they bought and no longer used.

True IMAX using 18/70 (18 perf 70 mm) are rare - there are only 30 theatres in the world who can play that (it’s a legacy format). Most lost the capability when IMAX moved to digital. The remaining 18/70 theatres will likely remain because there is interest in the format, and to recoup the investment. An 18/70 print costs around $100K and it’s something the theatres keep, which is a rarity. Even in the days of 35mm, most theatres would rent the film instead of purchase them so at the end of the run they’d return them. And in the digital age, well, they don’t own anything - the projectors have to get a license key every time they show a movie, and that key gets the theatre charged for the showing. They also have another key that unlocks the movie for a set time period.

Disney does have the marketing might to push their own IMAX system, but theatre owners will be watching - if it remains Disney only, they may only stick with IMAX as it’s basically booked all the time, while a Disney system will only be used for the few Disney films released

IMAX requirements are harsh - but it’s because they hold a standard. The screen must have a certain reflectivity to it (it’s changed every 5 years). The sound is calibrated and adjusted - the theatre actually cannot change the volume. If they do adjust the volume, IMAX can remote change it back and the bulb life and brightness is carefully monitored. But that’s also why they can charge a premium ticket price for it - you’re getting a presentation that’s designed to be the same and well presented and adjusted. I’ve been in way too many theatres where the sound is too loud and having too much bass I felt sick. The premium IMAX ones the bass gives you a nice kick when it needs to but is otherwise restrained. They take advantage of dynamic range.

Of course, I’m referring to real IMAX theatres, and not the moder prevalent “LieMAX” ones which are converted screens. Disney would have a far easier time competing with Liemax

Can the ‘Attention Liberation Movement’ Foment a Rebellion Against Screens?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Associated Press looks at the small-but-growing “rebellion” against attention-hogging devices, citing “a growing body of literature calling for people to move away from screens and pay attention to life.”
D. Graham Burnett is a historian of science at Princeton University and one of the authors of " Attensity! A Manifesto of the Attention Liberation Movement,” making him a pillar of the growing backlash against the corporate harvesting of human attention. Along with MS NOW host Chris Hayes’ bestselling " The Sirens’ Call: How Attention Became the World’s Most Endangered Resource,” his work is part of a growing body of literature calling for people to move away from screens and pay attention to life. Burnett says the “attention liberation movement” is about throwing off the yoke of time-sucking apps. People “need to rewild their attention. Their attention is the fullness of their relationship to the world”....

There are several dozen “attention activism” groups across the United States and Canada, and the movement has also cropped up in Spain, Italy, Croatia, France and England. Burnett said he expects it to spread further.
Some examples cited in the article:

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader destinyland for sharing the article.


Boobtube

By Ritz_Just_Ritz • Score: 3, Informative Thread

I found that kids will just sit there and mindlessly watch inane video shorts on youtube for hours. Youtube is blackholed on my home network. Thank you pihole.

“Screens” are not the problem

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

What you do when in front of a screen may be though.

It’s about time

By burtosis • Score: 3 Thread
I was incredibly sick having 8 hours a day or more screen time, sometimes even 80 hours in a week. Now with this I don’t need to work anymore cutting out the vast majority of my screen time.

Re:“Screens” are not the problem

By alvinrod • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Most people aren’t disciplined enough to stop themselves if they’re even aware of the problem in the first place. The screens are incredibly effective mechanism for delivering little dopamine hits that the human brain craves. Human attention to these mechanisms selects for the most suitable and developers constantly try to build a better dark pattern to keep the eyeballs on their app instead of someone else’s.

Alcohol has been a part of human society for thousands of years and it’s still a problem for us. Some people can use it responsibly and others can’t. I would imagine that’s due to evolution slowly filtering out the genes that couldn’t handle it in moderation. This is an entirely new drug that humans have far less experience with though. Television may share some similarities, but what smartphones have on offer is an entirely different beast.

The scary part is that it will probably get worse before it gets better.

It will happen organically

By GeekWithAKnife • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Once upon a time we were told watching TV all-day will make us dumb. That we must stop watching TV. We were told that playing videogames all day…etc

Arsoke point more and more people’s brains will stop getting the dopamine hit because watching lolcats has a ceiling. Same for YouTube shorts and such.


Wait until VR hits mainstream. You’d finally be able to advertise inside everyone’s virtual homes and colour their rain in pepsi. VI assistants will recommend Nike or Reebok. Noncompete brands will tag team; if you do X then get brand A and the other if you do Y.

Look to the past. Every fashion and craze came and eventually went. You think parents didn’t try to get their kids to stop listening to Rock n’ Roll? (Which as the meme goes leads to sex and blasphemy)

Stop trying to herd cats. Try to get the positives and avoid the negatives and the rest will take care of itself.

“But what about…” it’ll take care of itself not because of the great creator or but because people want things and they get bored. Attention will shift. Someone will make a new gizmo…and maybe that will be a better screen but heck without this screen I’m using to see what I type this sort of interaction wouldn’t work.

Take a Visual Display Unit break every 45 minutes if it makes you feel more attentive.

Remembering Zip Drives - the Trendy Storage Technology of the 1990s

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Back in the 1990s, floppy disks “had a mere capacity of 1.44MB,” remembers XDA Developers, “which would soon become absolutely tiny for the increasingly large pieces of software that would come about.”
Floppy disks also felt quite fragile, and while we got “superfloppy” formats that were physically larger and had more capacity, those were pretty unwieldy as portable storage. Enter 1994, when a company called Iomega introduced its variant of a “superfloppy”, the Zip drive… [T]he initial capacity introduced in 1994 reached a whopping 100MB, which was huge number when put up against the traditional floppy disk. Zip drives also had major performance benefits, with read speeds that could average 1.4MB/s, as opposed to the comparatively sluggish 16kB/s speeds of a traditional floppy disk, as well as a seek time of around 28ms seconds, whereas a floppy disk averaged 200ms. Zip drives weren’t quite as fast as desktop HDDs, but for portable storage, this was a huge step forward…

[I]n 1998, Iomega introduced the Zip 250 disks, which increased the capacity to 250MB, and, already in the new millennium, we got the Zip 750, which took that further to 750MB… It was an appealing enough proposition that big computer manufacturers like Dell started including a Zip drive in some of their PCs. Even Apple included Zip drives in some of its Power Macintosh models from the mid-to-late 90s. However, things started to shift towards the end of the decade as other portable formats rose to prominence, most notably CDs and USB flash drives.

Despite their initial success, it didn’t take long for users to start noticing a major drawback of Zip drives: many times, they would just fail. It wasn’t necessarily related to age or any particular misuse of the disks, it just happened. It was a big enough phenomenon that it became known as the “click of death”, and once it happened, your drive was gone. The problem was estimated by Iomega to affect around 0.5% of Zip drives, but while that sounds like a small number, when you sell products by the thousands, it becomes fairly widespread. It was a big enough issue that, in September 1998, a class action lawsuit was filed against Iomega for the common problems. Some of the complaints in that lawsuit were eventually dismissed by the court of Delaware, but others were not, and once the public became aware of the problems with Zip drives, it was hard for the brand to make a comeback.

It didn’t help that this happened around the same time as formats such as CDs were becoming more popular… And eventually, USB flash drives became the most popular way to carry data around since they were smaller and offered much faster speeds… Eventually, after seeing its profits plummet by the mid-2000s, Iomega was sold to a company called EMC in 2008, and in 2013, EMC and Lenovo formed a joint venture that took over Iomega’s business and removed all of the Iomega branding from its products.
The article does note that “as late as 2014, some aviation companies were still using Zip drives to distribute updates for navigation databases.” Are there any Slashdot readers who still remember their own Zip drive experiences?

Share your memories in the comments of that once-so-trendy storage technology from the 1990s…

I owned three.

By SeaFox • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

I had a Zip 100 (SCSI), a Zip 250 (SCSI), and towards the end I got one of the low-profile USB-powered drives. I didn’t ever get the click of death. Actually I still have all three of them in storage now I think, and since one is USB I might be able to theoretically recover any data I have on disks still. Zip drives were great when I first got into it since my PC at the time was a Mac IIsi with a hard disk of only 120 Megabytes.

amazing for its time

By Ender_Wiggin • Score: 5, Informative Thread

It held the equivalent over 70 floppy disks, at the time of its introduction it was a huge leap forward and despite being proprietary it was such a popular format.

Originally SCSI and Parallel-port only (or internal), then it got onto USB.

Iomega also had the Jaz drives, which held 1GB. Hot swappable hard drives was a wild idea, the problem was it had a reputation for major reliability issues and high failures.

They looked really cool

By locater16 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I mean, look at this thing,it was a sci-fi Gameboy Advance doohiky before there was the GBA. But then I recently learned Japan had minidisc during the 90’s, and just look at this cool thing, that’s even cooler, I’m pretty sure it’s what Neo hands some guy at the beginning of The Matrix, and kid me is jealous of how cool this looks.

There was also the LS120

By flightmaker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

I have a couple of these drives gathering dust on the top shelf of my play room. They fitted a standard floppy drive slot but connected to the PATA socket on the motherboard. I just looked on the label of one of them which has a manufacturing date of march 1999.

These were a great idea. They were compatible with standard 1.44MB floppy discs so didn’t take up an extra slot in the PC case but could also use the special discs which could store 120MB.

Unfortunately, after using them for a short while, I started to find errors when reading back to check and verify backup archive files. The drives themselves didn’t fail when I was using them but the media proved to be pretty much as unreliable as the late manufactured cheap and very nasty standard floppy discs.

Soon afterwards, reliable USB flash drives were becoming cheaper in ever increasing capacities so I donated an unopened, factory shrink wrapped box of LS120 discs to the local Museum of Computing. So that was the end of the super floppy.

Re:The 90s are not ancient history!

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

This is the tech industry. The talking about the 90s may as well be about archaeologists digging in Pompeii. The tech landscape was literally nothing at all like what it is today. We have different tech, providing different benefits, doing different things, used in fundamentally different ways. It is absolutely ancient history and storage in the 90s is about as different to today as storage in the 50s from punch cards differs to today.

There is literally zero in common in storage now to then. Now if you’ll excuse me I need to make sure my files have cloud sync’d from the internet properly before my flight (something which didn’t even exist as a storage concept back in the 90s, let alone something millions of people do)

Duolingo CEO Says They’ve Stopped Tracking Employees’ AI Use for Performance Reviews

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Last May Duolingo’s stock peaked at $529.05. But while the learning app passed $1 billion in revenue in 2025 and 50 million daily active users, today its stock price has dropped more than 81%, to $100.51.

And there’s been other changes, reports Entrepreneur:
In April 2025, Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn made headlines after writing a memo calling the company "AI-first.” In the memo, von Ahn announced that the language-learning platform would track employees’ AI use in performance reviews. Now, a year later, von Ahn is backtracking and rethinking how he measures employee performance. He told the Silicon Valley Girl podcast earlier this month that Duolingo no longer considers AI use in performance reviews.

The change arose after employees started to ask, “Do you just want us to use AI for AI’s sake?” von Ahn explained. “We said no, look — the most important thing in your performance is that you are doing whatever your job is as well as possible. A lot of times, AI can help you with that, but if it can’t, I’m not going to force you to do that,” von Ahn said on the podcast. He felt as though the company was “trying to push something that in some cases did not fit” instead of “being held accountable for the actual outcome.” The CEO is, however, still sticking to other “constructive constraints” he introduced in the April 2025 memo, including stopping contractor hiring in cases where AI can assume their workload…

Von Ahn also mentioned that a few months ago, Duolingo had a day dedicated to vibe coding, or prompting AI to create an app without manually writing a single line of code. Every single person at the company, from engineers to human resources professionals, had to vibe code an app. Vibe coding has made an impact at the company. One of Duolingo’s latest offerings, a course teaching users how to play chess, arose when two people vibe-coded the first prototype of it, the CEO said. Neither of them knew how to play chess or program, but they managed to use AI to create the whole chess curriculum and a prototype of the app in about six months last year. Now chess is Duolingo’s fastest-growing course, according to von Ahn. “At this point, we have seven million daily active users that are learning chess,” the CEO said on the podcast.

Six months?

By thecombatwombat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They made every employee vibe code, and OK it made a chess app.

IN SIX MONTHS?!?!? And they still emphasize it was just a prototype?

That’s the impressive AI fast timeline?

Oh my, no one has ever taught Chess before. What an efficient, innovative thing that could never have happened except in this wonderful future.

Just WTF.

A rare good use of AI

By unixisc • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Actually, this is one of those rare cases where AI does help improve the product. Since any translation package would beat most linguists alive today, but AI would greatly help insert context for the translations

That said, it’s good that Duolingo is no longer coercing employees to use AI for their work

Ugh. So six months more at *my* company?

By Tony Isaac • Score: 3 Thread

Yep, they have a dashboard that shows, for each employee, on which days of the month they used AI. It doesn’t matter what they used it for, or how often they used it, just that they used it. And the executives don’t want to see any blank days.

For some odd reason, they aren’t looking at the other dashboard that shows that pull requests aided by AI, are taking longer than PRs not aided by AI.

The hype is overwhelming at this point. If you dare challenge the “AI makes work go faster” mantra, you are short listed for the exit door.

I’ll be thrilled if the hype dies down in only six months.

SpaceX, Blue Origin Compete For ‘Artemis III’ Mission

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
After Artemis II’s astronauts returned to earth, “NASA has Artemis III in its sights,” reports the Associated Press:
In a mission recently added to the docket for next year, Artemis III’s yet-to-be -named astronauts will practice docking their Orion capsule with a lunar lander or two in orbit around Earth. Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin are racing to have their company’s lander ready first. Musk’s Starship and Bezos’ Blue Moon are vying for the all-important Artemis IV moon landing in 2028. Two astronauts will aim for the south polar region, the preferred location for [NASA Administrator Jared] Isaacman’s envisioned $20 billion to $30 billion moon base. Vast amounts of ice are almost certainly hidden in permanently shadowed craters there — ice that could provide water and rocket fuel.

The docking mechanism for Artemis III’s close-to-home trial run is already at Florida’s Kennedy Space Center. The latest model Starship is close to launching on a test flight from South Texas, and a scaled-down version of Blue Moon will attempt a lunar landing later this year.

Why can’t they all just get along?

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Here’s an idea - give it to Boeing / ULA. You save money because you don’t have to worry about the return leg of the trip.

Re:Kind of surprising

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Not sure what sources of “press coverage” you’re following, but… it was all over the news I read and watch, at least.

SpaceX vs Blue Origin

By hdyoung • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Bidding for a big space job? Thats kind of like choosing between a veteran of two wars and a 19 year old that worked as security one summer for the local retirement home.

Im actually really rooting for Blue Origin to be successful. But right now there is no other space company that even comes close to SpaceX. Blue Orgin has launched a few tourists into what charitably counts as space. If you look past the hype around their founder, SpaceX is a company that launches nearly every other day. Thats more than more than the rest of the planet combined.

New Movie Trailer Shows First AI-Generated Performance By a Major Star: the Late Val Kilmer

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“A trailer has been released for the first film to star an authorised generative AI version of a major Hollywood actor,” writes The Guardian:
Val Kilmer was cast in western As Deep As the Grave before his death in April 2025. Production delays meant he never shot any scenes, but the creative team worked with UK-based company Sonantic to create an AI speaking voice based on his old recordings. His estate and daughter Mercedes collaborated with the film-makers on the visual deepfake of the actor. Kilmer, who was diagnosed with throat cancer, was also assisted by technology for his cameo in 2022’s Top Gun: Maverick

Writer-director Coerte Voorhees confirmed that Kilmer is seen for around an hour of the film’s running time… Voorhees has said that the production followed Sag-Aftra [union] guidelines, and that Kilmer’s estate — which provided archival material for them to use — was compensated financially.
“Kilmer’s likeness can be seen portraying Father Fintan, a Catholic priest and Native American spiritualist,” adds The Hollywood Reporter. But the AV Club calls it "ghoulish puppet show time.”

“Having your AI Val Kilmer puppet whisper ‘Don’t fear the dead, and don’t fear me’ in a movie trailer is a bold choice…”
He is accompanied (per Variety) by a whole host of disclaimers, caveats, and explanations offered by writer-director Coerte Voorhees and his associates: Kilmer deeply wanted to be in the movie, but was too sick to do so. His family endorses and supports his inclusion. He was a big fan of technology, including, presumably, its use in turning his own image into a digital avatar to then shove into movies…

The fact is, of course, that nobody would be paying a fraction of this attention to As Deep As The Grave — about early female archeologist Ann Axtell Morris — if it weren’t now being used as the stage on which Voorhees was very publicly accepting the dare to go full-on ghoulish with AI tech.
“The filmmakers said they hoped they were showing Hollywood how to use the technology in a positive way…” notes Australia’s ABC News. But their articles add that “Some have called the trailer ‘terrifying’ and ‘disgusting’ on social media.”

Mashable writes:
“Very fitting that this trailer includes a scene where a corpse is unceremoniously yanked out of the ground,” read one of the top comments on As Deep as the Grave’s trailer at time of writing… [O]nline commenters have labelled it disgusting and disrespectful, not only for digitally reanimating Kilmer but also for the damaging precedent As Deep as the Grave‘s use of AI could set for the film industry as a whole.

Re:not to disrespect the late Val Kilmer but fuck

By Brain-Fu • Score: 4 Thread

Many machines have replaced or greatly reduced the need for human labor. What makes acting deserving of special protection from automation?

Re:not to disrespect the late Val Kilmer but fuck

By quonset • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Many machines have replaced or greatly reduced the need for human labor. What makes acting deserving of special protection from automation?

Acting is not a one-way street like machines are. For example, a combine does one thing really well: cut down and process a crop. It does not make marinara sauce, does not swim in the ocean, does not make hamburgers, and a whole host of other things.

Whereas an actor/actress isn’t just repeating lines. They are emoting so you and I believe they are who they are portraying. They are moving within the scene. They may jump, be suspended from wires, dive into water, or even look as if they are cooking for a role. They have a wide range of things they need to do as an actor/actress. And unlike a combine, they may portray a variety of characters. In the case of Kilmer, he’s portray a jet pilot, a gunshooter, a criminal, a PhD candidate working on a laser, and a singer, to name a few. Each of those are distinct from one another and require the person to change how they act.

* It was nearly 8 at night and I hadn’t eaten supper yet so my post does lean heavily on food refrences.

The purpose of art

By wickerprints • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

is not, as many would have you believe, to be found solely in its consumption or appreciation.

Art is a dialogue. It is a conversation between humans—those who feel joy and pain, sorrow and hope; and it is the embodiment of creative expression in which the artist, for all their imperfections and struggle, brings into being something that marks existence—as if to say, “I was once here, in this space that you now observe.”

And that is not necessarily pretentiousness or egocentrism. Art is born from a desire to connect with others, across space and time.

The intrinsic problem of “generative AI” as it is presently utilized as a vehicle of artistic expression is that, overwhelmingly, it fails to create a true dialogue, in much the same way that using a chatbot amounts to speaking with nobody but yourself. There may be a director and other humans who are prompting the AI and exerting control over the output, but the lack of human actors and cinematographers means that the result can only ever be a simulation of art, not art itself. It is not until we can create artificial consciousness—machines that experience human emotions and concept of self—that we can ever say that their status can transcend that of mere tools and their product might become art. To be clear, I am not suggesting we should attempt to do so. But what we have today is very, very far away from this.

Maybe a simulation is enough for most people, who think of popular media as nothing more than transitory stories to consume, discard, and forget. That the audience may not have the capacity to respect art as a process, by failing to distinguish what it is and is not, does not invalidate the artist, no more than someone who doesn’t understand mathematics or computer programming can decide that it is not worth learning or doing.

The reason why there is a lot of pushback against AI has to do with the preposterous notion that it can (and therefore, should) serve as a substitute for human creativity. Of all of the things that such sophisticated computational models could be used for, the last thing that I would want it to do for me is my thinking and feeling. We should be using technology to make our lives easier and give us more freedom to express ourselves creatively, not less. People who are using it to simulate art have entirely missed the point of why we make art in the first place. Creative expression is not a chore like washing my dishes and scrubbing my toilet bowl. Yes, making art is sometimes painful and difficult and challenging. But that struggle is not something to be eliminated. It is meant to be overcome.

AI apologists—at least, nearly all of those I have met—are, in my view, nearly entirely lacking in understanding of what makes living worthwhile; and those who do understand are intentionally and cynically promoting AI because they stand to gain financially from this position.

Re:not to disrespect the late Val Kilmer but fuck

By PsychoSlashDot • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

why would acting deserve special protection from automation?

I’ll give it a shot.

There are some tasks that people enjoy doing. Replacing a career path that most participants want to do (or at least claim to want to do) obsoletes the human race.

It’s one thing to automate drudge work that almost nobody wants to do. Clean toilets? Make a robot. It’s also understandable to replace humans in jobs where computers/robots can do it better and it matters. Soon robot surgeons will be the clear best choice. Additionally it makes sense to keep some neutral jobs available for people who enjoy doing manual tasks like farming. Automate most of food-growing but leave it a viable career path for people who legitimately take pleasure in growing things.

But the arts? Why - aside from maximizing bullshit profits for faceless corporations - would we want to deprive the throngs of aspiring artists? Sure, sure, it someone’s crap at it they should find a different job. But why are we even contemplating AI music when there’s a nearly limitless supply of people who are quite talented but there isn’t a slot for them in the money machine?

Without things people enjoy doing, there’s no point in being people. We might as well just turn on a looping game of SimCity and euthanize our species. Having a robot eat your breakfast for you is unfulfilling and so is this.

Disclosure: I am in no way an artist. I don’t have skin in this game and never could. But I’m enough of a left-brained individual that I can recognize the logic in preserving right-brain purpose.

Re:The purpose of art

By wickerprints • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

It makes more sense as a dialogue if we think of it not so much as a one-to-one conversation, but more like an ongoing, global discourse. After all, movies are not made in a vacuum, and they are—generally speaking—not made for a single specific individual to watch. The artist is informed and shaped by their experiences.

I frame it this way because I want to move away from the “maker”/“viewer” framework—this dichotomy of the creator of an experience versus those who experience the creation. There is a kind of feedback at play that is intrinsic to the ability to create art and to enjoy it. We even see this in cinema—the works of actors (which roles they choose, how they play those roles) are invariably influenced by the culture and sentiments that surround them.

In a strict sense, you are right—it’s not as if the artist is directly engaging in a back-and-forth literal conversation. But I think that a more encompassing point of view is useful for contextualizing why generative AI being propped up as “art” is so offensive to some. It doesn’t feel “real” to us, and it isn’t because the tool is “artificial”—we have computer animated films, for instance. It’s because it feels disengaged from that feeling of human connection.

Old Cars ‘Tell Tales’ by Storing Data That’s Never Wiped

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Slashdot reader Bismillah shared this report from ITNews:
Research and development engineer Romain Marchand of Paris headquartered Quarkslab obtained a telematic control unit (TCU) from a salvage yard in Poland… Marchand tore down the TCU, which is based on a Qualcomm system on a chip, and extracted the Linux-based file system from the Micron multi-chip package (MCP) which contained NAND-based non-volatile storage memory. The non-volatile storage contained sensitive information, including system configuration data and more importantly, logs that revealed the vehicle’s GPS positions over time.

None of that information was encrypted, Marchand told iTnews, which made it possible to collect and retrieve sensitive data of interest. What’s more, the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) logs with GPS positions covered the BYD’s full journey from the factory in China to its operational life in the United Kingdom, and to its final wrecking in Poland, Marchand explained in an analysis… The issue is not restricted to BYD, and Marchand added that the hardware architecture of the Chinese car maker’s TCU is broadly similar to what can be found in other brands.

Encryption

By rtkluttz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I hate how it is always presented like lack of encryption is a bad thing. In many cases it is not. Someone has to have physical control to get to that data. Physical control is the first piece of security. Encryption in many cases after that protects NOTHING from the owners perspective. Encryption after that fact, other than the end to end communications are almost always used AGAINST the owner. Metrics and information that the owner never gets a chance to explicitly deny. I agree with encrypted communications and even encryption at rest, but things like pinned certificates and other aspects of encryption do absolutely nothing but allow manufacturers to weaponize things against the owner. Being blocked out is the first step, but after that comes data mining. Then after that comes artificially crippled features so those features can be sold back to you piecemill. Fuck that and them. Every connected thing should be forced by the government to have features at the bare minimum that allow the owner to see data streams and control what goes where. Zero trust is the gold standard in security and the fact that owners are not allowed to lock out the manufacturer from EV’s and other cars is patently ridiculous. These things are connected to the grid a large portion of the time for God’s sake. Government needs to step in and enforce that all connected things have a root level firewall that allows the OWNER to control the security and where the data goes and the ability to inspect encrypted traffic to see if they approve of it leaving the vehicle or the connected thing.

Re:That’s not an old car

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It sounds like a bug. Tesla did the same thing and it resulted in a lot of Teslas dying prematurely because the flash memory wore out due to all the logging.

They tried to charge people to fix it too.

Technobabble

By ByTor-2112 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

You know that when the article has more techobabble than a TNG episode and more acronyms than the US Military, it’s some high quality journalism.

“Hackermanz extracted the positronic matrix unit (PMU), based on a quantum chip by Quanticorp, and extracted the Linux-based filesystem [wtf is a ‘linux-based filesystem’???] from the Romulan control package (RCP) which contained DTRD based tachyon storage”

Not just GPS

By YrWrstNtmr • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Purchasing a 2017 car in 2023, from Carvana.
Great car, good deal.

I know the original owners address, where he worked, the places he frequented, his kids house, etc, etc.
All stored in the nav memory.

No GPS logs, just the places he purposely stored.


People…purge your stuff before selling!

Re:Not just GPS

By caseih • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

If cars are basically just phones now, they should at least provide a factory reset button!

Fewer US College Students Major in CS. More Choose Data Science, Engineering

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“From 2008 to 2024, the number of four-year computer science degrees granted rose about fivefold…” reports the Washington Post. Then in 2025 CS suddenly dropped from the fourth-largest undergraduate major to sixth, they report (citing data from the nonprofit National Student Clearinghouse, which compiles numbers from 97% of U.S. universities.

The 54,000-student drop was “the biggest one-year drop of any major discipline going back to at least 2020.” But what major are they choosing instead?
Sarah Karamarkovich, a research associate with the National Student Clearinghouse, pointed to an explanation from the data that we had overlooked. Enrollments in two interdisciplinary majors, data analytics and data science, topped a combined 35,000 in the fall of 2025. That was up from a few hundred when those disciplines were broken out into their own majors in 2020. Those relatively new categories reflect colleges’ zeal to create specialized majors, including in AI, data science, robotics and cybersecurity. Some of those disciplines may be counted in the national enrollment data as computer science. Others are not.

The numbers suggest that some of the disappearing computer science majors didn’t flee so much as they splintered into related disciplines.... The 8 percent decline in computer science majors last fall was nearly mirrored by a 7.3 percent increase in engineering majors, according to the National Student Clearinghouse data. Within engineering, mechanical and electrical engineering major enrollments increased by the largest absolute amounts — a jump of 11 percent and 14 percent, respectively.

The profession is maturing

By Tony Isaac • Score: 3 Thread

Once upon a time, there were doctors. When you were sick, you called one to your home. But over time, the profession grew and became more specialized. These days, a doctor (primary care physician) is a member of a shrinking class of general practitioners.

Once upon a time, there were programmers. Programmers told computers what to do. But as time has passed, they have specialized into related fields: back end, front end, data management, analytics, and yes, AI. The specialization will continue. (And no, AI won’t wipe out the profession, any more than power tools have wiped out construction professions.)

Because internships and jobs are few

By btroy • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
My son was about one year from his undergrad in C.S. A very reputable school. His grades nearly all A’s.

Available internships - nearly zero.

Maybe that is related?

He shifted to engineering, where the opportunities are … at least for now.

Engineering is probably a good choice

By gweihir • Score: 3 Thread

Many will still be doing software, but with an actual engineering education to help them. But Data Science? I think that stuff may be within reach of AI eventually. It is mostly statistics and data conditioning, both things AI can do. Of course, really good data scientists will still be in demand, but the mid-range ones? They may be screwed.

US Congress Fails to Pass Long-Term FISA Extension, Authorizes It Through April 30

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Yesterday the U.S. Congress approved “a short-term extension” of a FISA law that allows wiretaps without a warrant for surveilling foreign targets, reports CNN — but only until April 30. Republican congressional leaders had sought an 18-month extension, but “failed to secure” the votes after “clamoring from some of their members for reforms to protect Americans’ privacy.”
The warrantless surveillance law, known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, was set to expire on Monday night. Members are hoping the additional time will allow them to come to agreement without ending authorization for the intelligence gathering program, which permits US officials to monitor phone calls and text messages from foreign targets… There was an hour of suspense in the Senate Friday morning when it appeared possible that Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden, a longtime critic of FISA 702, might block the House-passed extension. But ultimately, he said his House colleagues had assured him “this short-term extension makes reform more likely, and expiration makes reform less likely,” and so he chose not to object....

House Republican leaders believed Thursday night they had struck a deal with conservative holdouts who harbor deep and longstanding concerns that a key piece of the law infringes on Americans’ privacy rights. But in a pair of after-midnight votes, more than a dozen rank-and-file Republicans rejected the long-term reauthorization plan on the floor, which was the result of days of tense negotiations among leadership, lawmakers and the White House.

The law allows authorized US officials to gather phone calls and text messages of foreign targets, but they can also incidentally collect the data of Americans in the process. Senior national security officials have for years said the law is critical for thwarting terror attacks, stemming the flow of fentanyl into the US and stopping ransomware attacks on critical infrastructure. Civil liberties groups on the left and the right, meanwhile, argue the surveillance authority risks infringing on Americans’ privacy.

FISA ? What sport is that?

By rossdee • Score: 3 Thread

I know FIFA is soccer
and FIA is Formula 1 racing (But they got paused by the Gulf War, and I got a note today from F!-TV saying my subscription is expiring and is not available for renewal)

Re:Obama and Biden

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

supported this too, without question.

It turns out neither of them are president right now and thus your comment is irrelevant to the situation at hand. Even in politics not everything needs to be about partisanship. We criticised Obama at the time, we criticised Biden at the time, and we will criticise Trump, just like we did last time too (except for DrMrLordX who insisted in 2024 that Trump won’t pass this because he’s mad it was used against his staffers in 2026 [sic - he meant 2016], lets see how well his post ages).

Ya, but …

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 3 Thread

House Republican leaders believed Thursday night they had struck a deal with conservative holdouts who harbor deep and longstanding concerns that a key piece of the law infringes on Americans’ privacy rights.

All of whom are apparently okay with ICE arresting, deporting and killing U.S. citizens, though.

FISA was born out of 9/11

By Tony Isaac • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

It was a time when the world was especially paranoid, and we were willing to trade most of our privacy, for security. It wasn’t a good trade then, and it still isn’t a good trade.

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978

By cusco • Score: 4, Informative Thread

FISA was passed in 1978, and was the worst thing to come out of the Carter Administration (which was actually pretty good about most other aspects of privacy so it’s doubtful he envisioned the way it’s subsequently metastasized.)