Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Microsoft Can Track Users Via a Windows Device ID
  2. Amazon Will Stop Accepting New Customers For Mechanical Turk
  3. Learning Another Language Appears To Slow Brain Aging By Up To 13 Years
  4. US Cyber Agency Is Using Anthropic’s Mythos To Audit Government Code
  5. GitHub Thumbs Nose At Sony’s Controversial End to Physical Media With Its Introduction of Repo CDs
  6. Research Universities Are Admitting Fewer PhDs, a Bad Sign For Science
  7. Small AI Models Gain Traction Around the World
  8. Supreme Court Allows Texas To Require Age Verification For Mobile Apps
  9. South Korea’s SK Hynix Launching $28 Billion US Listing To Ride Global AI Wave
  10. Zombie ‘Who Owns Unix?’ Lawsuit Comes Alive Again
  11. Secret Claude Tracker Shocks Users After Anthropic’s Anti-Surveillance Stance
  12. Microsoft Lays Off Nearly 5,000 Employees Across Xbox, Commercial Sales
  13. Nintendo Switch 2 Is Getting a Replaceable Battery in Europe
  14. Americans of All Ages Are Spending Less Time Socializing
  15. Fines Doubled As Teens Outsmart Australia’s Social Media Ban

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Microsoft Can Track Users Via a Windows Device ID

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A criminal complaint against alleged Scattered Spider member Peter Stokes revealed that Microsoft can associate Windows activity with a persistent “Global Device ID,” which investigators used to link his PC to online activity connected to a hack. While unique device IDs are common, the case has raised privacy concerns because the identifier can apparently persist across updates, has no simple opt-out, and may allow Microsoft to connect a Windows installation to activity on third-party services. PCMag reports:
Last week, the U.S. announced it had extradited 19-year-old Peter Stokes from Europe for allegedly being a member of the notorious hacking group Scattered Spider. But the case stands out because Microsoft played a key role in linking Stokes to the suspected hacking crimes, according to an unsealed criminal complaint. Stokes allegedly hacked an unnamed luxury jewelry retailer in May 2025 while using a VPN. The 39-page criminal complaint shows the FBI used Microsoft records to discover that his IP address was associated with a Microsoft device identifier known as Global Device ID (GDID).

“According to a Microsoft representative, a Global Device Identifier in the Windows ecosystem is a persistent, device-level identifier designed to uniquely identify an installation of a Windows operating system on a device, either a physical device (e.g., a mobile phone or laptop) or virtual machine, across certain Microsoft services and scenarios,” the complaint explains. The global device ID isn’t exactly surprising, given that it’s standard practice to assign a unique ID to each account or device so a tech provider can recognize and distinguish between them. But the complaint reveals Microsoft can associate the GDID with third-party services and the timing as well, giving Redmond a way to theoretically track a user’s online activity. In other words, Redmond might be able to track the online activity of your Windows PC without third-party browser cookies.

Stokes was discovered exploiting a web development tool called ngrok to bypass the jewelry retailer’s network defenses. The complaint says Microsoft had records showing that on May 12, 2025, at 19:21 UTC, the GDID associated with Stokes’ computer “accessed, among other ngrok pages, ‘https://dashboard[.]ngrok.com/signup,’ the ngrok page to set up an ngrok account.” The document adds that Microsoft records also showed the GDID accessing “multiple sites” from servers at Tzulo, a web hosting provider, to help pull off the hack. Hence, the fact that federal investigators used the Microsoft identifier to nab a suspected hacker is raising concerns that it could be abused for other surveillance purposes. “Microsoft Windows is surveillance software,” cybersecurity expert Matthew Hickey alleged in a tweet.

Amazon Will Stop Accepting New Customers For Mechanical Turk

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch:
These may be the last days of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. An announcement on the Mechanical Turk website says that on July 30, 2026, the crowdsourcing service will close to new customers. Amazon Web Services says the decision was made after “careful consideration,” adding, “Existing customers can continue to use the service as normal. AWS continues to invest in security and availability improvements for Mechanical Turk, but we do not plan to introduce new features.” In other words, Amazon isn’t completely pulling the plug, but the service is very much on life support.
Further reading: Horror Stories From Inside Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (2020)

LLM Replacement?

By Luthair • Score: 3 Thread
I wonder whether this indicates that people are replacing usage with LLMs. I don’t have direct experience with mechanical Turk, but i assume since it relies on humans paid almost nothing the output won’t be perfect thus is similar in quality to LLMs

Learning Another Language Appears To Slow Brain Aging By Up To 13 Years

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A new study suggests multilingualism may slow brain aging, with bilingual people showing brains that appear about six years younger than monolingual speakers and people who speak four languages showing brains that appear up to 13 years younger. Researchers say earlier language learning and higher proficiency appear to strengthen the effect. The Guardian reports:
Our brains are made up of billions of nerve cells that communicate with one another. But as we get older, the connectivity in our brains often deteriorates, causing memory and speed of thought to decline. While previous research had observed that people from European countries with greater language proficiency tended to age more slowly, this study measured the impact of speaking languages on individual brains. Scientists in Spain, Chile, Argentina and Dublin compared people living in the Basque region — characterized by high levels of multilingualism — who spoke Spanish, Basque, French and/or English.

To measure neurological age, the scientists used magnetoencephalography to measure the brain activity of 728 people with varying ages and levels of linguistic ability. They then used AI to process the results to calculate a normal level of brain connectivity at any given age. A second unrelated group of 144 people were then scanned and compared, comprising equal numbers of people speaking one, two, three or four languages.

Dr Lucia Amoruso, from the Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language in San Sebastian, said: “In simple terms, people who spoke more languages tended to have brains that looked younger than expected for their chronological age. The effect was not only related to the number of languages spoken. Higher language proficiency and earlier acquisition of a second language were also associated with more delayed brain ageing. This suggests that multilingual experience matters as a gradient: it is not simply about being bilingual or not, but about the depth and duration of language experience.”

Saw a similar article

By smooth wombat • Score: 3 Thread
BBC Science has an article where experts ranked 400 jobs by their dementia risk. Those least likely to die from Alzheimer’s were taxi drivers and ambulance drivers. The reason behind this seems to be that constant spatial and navigation processing tasks might offer some protection from Alzheimer’s.

The authors do have one caveat: While researchers found that taxi and ambulance drivers were less likely to die of Alzheimer’s, they were also more likely to die young.

That’s an issue because Alzheimer’s is a disease that becomes more likely the older you get. If people in those professions aren’t living long enough to get Alzheimer’s, that could explain some of the results.

“The paper isn’t an advert for becoming a taxi driver - unfortunately they’re dying earlier” Spiers says. “Importantly, however, the researchers reran their analysis correcting for age and still found a significant effect.”

It seems using your brain other than for existence might help stave off mental decline.

Good thing I’m learning Golang

By LindleyF • Score: 3 Thread
That counts right?

US Cyber Agency Is Using Anthropic’s Mythos To Audit Government Code

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
CISA is reportedly using Anthropic’s Mythos model to scan government code repositories for security vulnerabilities, with sources saying the audits have already found numerous bugs. Reuters reports:
The scanning is being done by CISA’s Attack Surface Evaluation team, according to one of the sources. The team is a group within CISA that conducts digital security assessments and hacking exercises across government. Two of the sources said the audits had already uncovered a large number of vulnerabilities but did not elaborate. Reuters could not establish exactly how much government code the team had gone through or the nature or severity of the bugs it discovered.

[…] The National Security Agency, the U.S. government’s powerful eavesdropping agency, has been using Mythos as far back as April despite the blacklist, Axios has reported. Late last month, the New York Times said that NSA analysts had been testing Mythos in classified settings and coming away impressed with its capabilities. But when Anthropic rolled out a public version of Mythos called Fable, which included what it described as cybersecurity safeguards, the White House suddenly demanded that it ban foreigners from running it. This triggered a global shutdown of the model that was lifted only last week.

GitHub Thumbs Nose At Sony’s Controversial End to Physical Media With Its Introduction of Repo CDs

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
GitHub is offering a limited run of 1,000 CD-ROM copies of public repositories as a pro-physical-media jab at Sony’s plan to stop producing PlayStation game discs in 2028. Tom’s Hardware reports:
The coding and collaboration platform, owned by Microsoft, states that “In light of recent developments in physical media, GitHub is proud to announce that you can now obtain your public repo on CD-ROM.” Moreover, it appeals to the human side of computing, adding the emotive line “Keep it. Lend it to friends. Pass it on to your children.” It isn’t April 1st, so thankfully this is no joke. However, if you check out the above-linked GitHub Your Code, On a CD offer page, it quickly becomes clear this is a very limited in time/scope stunt.

“Order a burned CD of your own public GitHub repo. Yes, a real physical disc you can hold in your hands, no download required,” begins the spiel. But this is a very limited run of 1,000 discs, with applications required between July 2 and July 6 (inclusive). Limit one per person, with availability varying between country/region.

“Your code is physically yours, forever. Until you lose it, let’s be real,” says GitHub. At best, these CDs will be framed and put on a wall, some becoming collector’s items or eBay money spinners (discs like 0001 or 0888 would be good ones, if they are numbered). Also, many will be lost or eventually/accidentally discarded, as GitHub seems to know. So this ‘protest’ is arguably 1,000 doses of expensively shipped e-waste.

Cool, we’re ready for post EMP gaming

By drnb • Score: 3 Thread
“GitHub is offering a limited run of 1,000 CD-ROM copies of public repositories "

Cool, we’re ready for post EMP gaming

90s Microsoft

By HnT • Score: 3 Thread

How delusional and tone deaf do you have to be to think you can present yourself as the good guys, as if nobody remembers the FUD and destructive and much hated Microsoft of the 90s, and the horrible M$ of today, and the shallow husk they twisted GitHub into.

Research Universities Are Admitting Fewer PhDs, a Bad Sign For Science

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:
The number of students admitted to Ph.D. programs this fall dropped 15 percent from the previous year, according to data from over 50 top research universities, raising fears that the nation’s capacity to produce new science could be diminished. The decline is driven, in part, by a chaotic and unpredictable federal funding environment under the Trump administration, as federal cuts are promised and then reversed, and budgets remain unclear.

A reduction in doctoral students could mean fewer scholars at universities to teach and mentor undergraduates. Higher education leaders also worry that, if the declines continue, there will be fewer researchers to power a rapidly evolving scientific work force. The data showing the decrease comes from 55 universities, all of them members of the Association of American Universities, an invitation-only organization that includes 69 of the most prestigious research institutions in the United States. The data collection was conducted by another group, the Association of American Universities Data Exchange.

Schools in A.A.U. confer half of the nation’s research doctorates, according to the association. “We are at risk of losing a whole generation of new talent because of the reduction in the capacity to support those students,” said Toby Smith, a senior vice president at the A.A.U. University leaders and research advocates cite many reasons for the declines in new doctoral students. Key federal agencies, such as the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, have been funding fewer research grants. The wealthiest institutions also face a new federal tax on their endowments.

But the most cited reason in interviews was the unreliable nature of federal funding under the Trump administration. The administration proposed major cuts to federal research agencies last year, but Congress restored the funding. It is again proposing big cuts. While Congress may again reverse the administration’s proposed reductions, the uncertainty makes it hard for schools to make multiyear commitments to doctoral students. The administration also abruptly ended thousands of research grants last year, arguing that they did not align with the government’s priorities. The administration restored many of the grants after judges deemed the eliminations illegal and arbitrary, but research advocates say the whiplash was damaging.

Re:Trump cut the funding

By nickovs • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

We don’t need more scientists. We need better ones who do their jobs instead of wasting their time being political activists. Get that and everything will be fine.

Can I ask how you define “being political activists”? Does it cover simply pointing out that statements by some politicians are at odds with the evidence? Do you consider saying “The available data consistently indicated that climate change is the result of human activity.” or “Vaccines do save lives; here are the studies which show it.” to be activism?

I submit that the perception that scientists are being political activists has very little to do with what the scientists are doing and a great to do with politicians who don’t like the science constantly complaining that scientists are activists and radicals. I’d be happy to run a study to try to measure that, but I suspect that it wouldn’t sway the opinions of the people who wrong.

Re:Trump cut the funding

By Mr. Barky • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I agree. Quality scientists like Albert Einstein or Ben Franklin should have just shut up and not lend their expertise to the discussions of the day.

WTF. Scientists have always been involved in political discussions. It would be utterly ridiculous to do without their informed advice - they tend to be smart people with knowledge and perspectives that many do not have. I am not saying one should blindly follow their opinions and advice, but I really, really don’t want them to shut up. They contribute immensely when they get involved.

Re:Trump cut the funding

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Ever notice how the fuck your feelings crowd has the most fragile feelings of all?

The only winner....

By LazLong • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The only winner here is China.

Thank you Trump.

Re:Trump cut the funding

By smooth wombat • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Ever notice how the people on the left calling for Sharia law, would be the first to be thrown off of buildings if it were ever implemented?

Hey dumbass, it’s those Red states trying their best to implement Sharia law through forcing the Bible into the classroom (but no other religious texts), displaying the ten commandments in schools (which they ignore), telling women what they can wear, telling women they must have babies, and a whole host of other things they’re trying to force down people’s throats.

As always, every accusation is a confession with you people.

Small AI Models Gain Traction Around the World

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
locater16 shares a report from IEEE Spectrum:
One morning in 2019, Adebayo Alonge was in a Cape Town hotel room, preparing to demonstrate his startup’s AI answer to a serious problem in African health care: counterfeit medication, which kills thousands of people across the continent every year. The RxScanner is a handheld spectrometer that scans a pill with infrared light, then sends the item’s molecular profile to an AI model equipped with a pharmaceutical database. In seconds, the AI identifies the medication from its molecular profile — or reports that it’s phony.

Pharmacies were using the system in more than a dozen countries, including Ghana, Kenya, Myanmar, and Alonge’s native Nigeria. But that morning in South Africa, it didn’t work. “I was shocked,” Alonge says… So Alonge immediately asked his engineers to shrink the AI model down to a smaller, low-power, unconnected version that could run entirely on his Android phone. They produced it 2 hours later, and that saved the demo. More importantly, the work birthed a new version of his device, which can authenticate a pill in places without broadband, computers, or even reliable electricity. It also turned Alonge into an advocate for this kind of “small AI.”
“The article goes on to detail other immediately useful ‘small’ AI applications without any subscription or billion dollar data centers needed,” writes locator16. For example, Bala Murugan and colleagues at Vellore Institute of Technology in India developed a drone-based system that photographs cashew plants and identifies disease-indicating splotches on the plants. The key advantage is that all processing happens on the drone itself, so farmers do not need a computer, broadband connection, or cloud server access.
In a Uruguayan vineyard, researchers developed small-AI systems to identify ant infestations. The article doesn’t go deep into the deployment details, but it presents this as another example of a narrow, localized model trained to recognize a specific agricultural threat. Small AI has also been used to detect the presence of malaria-carrying mosquitoes in multiple countries. This is especially useful in regions where public-health teams may lack reliable network access or expensive lab infrastructure, but still need fast, local detection.

In parts of Brazil without access to more complex medical equipment, researchers have used small AI to run electrocardiograms from an Arduino device. The article also describes Marcelo Jose Rovai’s work on a TinyML model that generates electrocardiograms in a patient simulator lab. Rovai also describes a newer experiment using an Arduino UNO Q with a Qualcomm chipset. The device runs a language model locally, collects sensor data, and analyzes it to detect tiny pools of water where mosquitoes might breed — while using only about 3 watts of power.

Re:Ok cool

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

> But why does rxscanner need AI? It’s a scanner and a database lookup. The AI is redundant no?

from Gemini

Pattern Recognition: Unlike a standard database that only looks for exact matches, AI looks for patterns.

Tolerance Handling: The AI accounts for minor variations, such as humidity, pill age, or scanner angles.

Anomaly Detection: Machine learning algorithms instantly flag if active ingredients are missing, diluted, or replaced with toxic fillers.

Re:Ok cool

By niftydude • Score: 5, Informative Thread
The rxscanner is a very cheap portable spectrometer, so it is probably a near IR or short wave IR device with quite poor spectral resolution.

On top of that, there is a lot of clutter in those spectral bands, not to mention measurement problems caused by varying reflectivity and light levels between samples taken in the wild

So it isn’t as simple as taking a scan and comparing the spectra you measure to a database, there is a lot of noise.

Machine learning/AI models to help with this are quite common in this field, and have been around for decades to help with spectral library lookups - long before the current LLM hype phase.

Re:Farming

By drnb • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
At my university the school of agriculture was next to the school science. I used to use the ag computer lab since it was better than the science computer lab. I was polite, gave up my computer if the lab started to get full, so the ag students didn’t mind my being there. Plus I was flippin amazed at the stuff they were doing. They enjoyed explaining it and I had some experience with embedded stuff so I could help out at times. So it was a kind of win win. Good times. Eye opening.

Re:What is small AI?

By DaPhil • Score: 4, Informative Thread

Obviously a small model (fewer parameters). Come on, it’s not that hard to understand. They got Qwen down to 4b and it still works, so I am not surprised that it works for small application areas such as this.

Re:Ok cool

By Rei • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Also: “The results of drug sample scans are recorded and stored on the blockchain”, which isn’t something that affects the choice of AI models, but does make me immediately suspicious that this whole thing is a grift / scam.

Supreme Court Allows Texas To Require Age Verification For Mobile Apps

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The Supreme Court allowed Texas to enforce a law requiring app stores to verify users’ ages and obtain parental consent before minors can download apps. Tech industry groups argue the law broadly restricts young people’s access to digital speech, but the court let a 5th Circuit order stand without explanation or noted dissents. CNN notes that the Supreme Court’s decision “doesn’t resolve the case but rather will allow Texas to enforce the law while the litigation continues to play out.” From the report:
“A minor child who downloads a software application from an app store agrees to contractual terms of service, including whether the child’s location will be tracked, whether the child’s privacy will be protected, whether information from the child’s phone can be sold by the developer, and whether the child waives the right to sue,” Texas told the Supreme Court in urging the court to allow its law to take effect.

But the Computer & Communications Industry Association, a trade group whose members include Apple and Google, said the law would effectively bar young people from accessing a wide range of content, “be it a book by Ernest Hemingway or J.K. Rowling, a Taylor Swift album, or a subscription to National Geographic.” Allowing the law to take effect, the group said, would have “profound consequences for the protection of digital speech.”

[…] In the new case, involving Texas’ age verification for apps, a federal district court blocked the law’s enforcement in December — days before it was set to take effect. But a three-judge panel of the conservative 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals put that decision on hold in early June, allowing the state to enforce it. By declining to take up the emergency appeal from the computer and student groups, the Supreme Court has left the 5th Circuit’s decision in place.

Re:Parent’s phone gets dialog to approve ....

By ArchieBunker • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Sounds like you agree it’s a decision for the parents. Why is the government getting involved then?

Re:Parent’s phone gets dialog to approve ....

By Moryath • Score: 5, Informative Thread
It’s interstate commerce. This should be a federal not state thing, but then again, you Klanturds hate the Constitution as you’ve proven over and over again…

Re:Parent’s phone gets dialog to approve ....

By Powercntrl • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Where is the great injustice here?

None of your examples involved age checking adults to make sure they’re not kids. That’s precisely the problem.

Re:Parent’s phone gets dialog to approve ....

By billyswong • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Want to buy alcohol, adults can be ID checked. So having an adult document that they are an adult is not an unheard of thing.

When you buy alcohol in a shop, the cashier ID check won’t form a centralized purchase record database for hackers to exploit. Online age check as of today all eagerly create such database, with your ID tied to all major social platform online speech.

Wrong argument

By Rashkae • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It was entirely the wrong argument. The question is not whether youth are barred from accessing content, (without parental supervision.). The question is that all adults are barred from accessing content without providing papers to untrusted entities.

South Korea’s SK Hynix Launching $28 Billion US Listing To Ride Global AI Wave

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
SK Hynix is launching a Nasdaq listing expected to raise about $28 billion, giving US investors easier access to one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI memory-chip boom. Reuters reports:
The company will sell 17.79 million new shares in the depository receipt listing on the Nasdaq. Ten ADRs will represent one common share and the stock will be sold in a price range that is due to be revealed on Monday, based on SK Hynix’s Seoul trading price. SK Hynix’s share price was down 4% at 2,327,000 won each on Monday, but the stock is up about 273% this year, as it rides surging global investor demand for AI stocks. Korea’s KOSPI was down 2.2% on Monday. […]

SK Hynix has been among the world’s largest beneficiaries of the AI boom as it outperformed its major rivals Samsung and Micron. “This is more than a liquidity event,” said Dave Mazza, the chief executive officer of Roundhill Investments in New York, which manages an exchange-traded fund tracking DRAM manufacturers, which is one of the most popular ways for U.S. investors to trade SK Hynix’s stock. “SK Hynix has been one of the most important companies in the world that most U.S. institutions could not easily own.” “The listing removes an accessibility discount, not a quality discount.”

[…] SK Hynix said the proceeds from the listing of the American Depositary Receipts will be used to build chip factories in South Korea and buy chipmaking equipment including an extreme ultraviolet scanner made by Dutch equipment maker ASML. The final price of the New York listing is due to be set on Thursday, ahead of the stock starting trade on Friday, regulatory filings showed. The company’s management will meet global investors on a roadshow this week. The deal is expected to be the second-biggest share sale after a record $85.7 billion initial public offering by SpaceX last month, surpassing Saudi Aramco’s $25.6 billion IPO in 2019 and Alibaba’s similar-sized offering in 2014.

Zombie ‘Who Owns Unix?’ Lawsuit Comes Alive Again

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The long-running SCO/IBM Unix and Linux ownership dispute has resurfaced yet again, this time through SCO successor Xinuos, which is trying to pursue old license and copyright claims tied to Project Monterey. “The core issue seems to be whether Xinuos even has the right to litigate the matter, or if some ancient legalese in the original agreements means the window for legal argument has long since expired,” reports The Register. From the report:
[T]he roots of the case are the 1998 alliance between IBM and a company called the Santa Cruz Operation which sold a version of UNIX for x86 CPUs. Those two companies, plus Intel and Sequent, created “Project Monterey” — an effort to create a unified version of UNIX that could run on multiple processors. By 2001, Project Monterey was close to delivering a unified UNIX, an achievement made possible by blending code from IBM and SCO.

By then, a little project called “Linux” already ran on multiple processors. Big Blue decided Linux was the future and bailed from Project Monterey — then allegedly contributed some Monterey code to the open-source project and to its own AIX and Z operating systems. SCO felt it owned some of that code, so sued IBM.

SCO and its successors struggled to survive, but interested parties kept the lawsuit alive because the chance to emerge as owner of parts of the Linux codebase, and IBM’s code, had the potential to turn into a colossal payday. The case and its successors ended in 2021, with a settlement that saw litigants agree to end the matter without IBM admitting fault. But by then, SCO had sold its software to a biz called Xinuos that decided to fight on.

The Xinuos case has burbled along quietly since, and on June 22nd reached the milestone of a hearing. The matter has become a little more modern, if only because this hearing was held online and the presiding judge appeared to unwittingly be on mute at one point. But the arguments otherwise seemed to revisit Project Monterey, debated the relevance of past litigation, contested who owned what, when they owned it, and how they could prove it. Xinuos argued IBM never had a license for SCO code. Big Blue argued that it did nothing wrong.

Re:Respecting copyright is an important part of FO

By Valgrus Thunderaxe • Score: 5 Thread
IF Linux has “Project Monterey” code in it

They can’t find it after 30 years.

Re:Respecting copyright is an important part of FO

By drnb • Score: 5, Funny Thread

IF Linux has “Project Monterey” code in it
They can’t find it after 30 years.

They only recently applied AI coding agents to the task. ;-)

Holy thread resurrection, Batman!

By Equuleus42 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

While we’re at it, why don’t we pour hot grits on a Beowulf cluster while Natalie Portman confirms that BSD is dying?

This was already decided way back when

By Todd Knarr • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This was already decided during the original trial. Two things will prevent Xinuos from succeeding:

1. SCO never had a license to the code they claim to own. They had a license to distribute it, but Novell owned the copyrights (such as they were).

2. The code SCO claimed was copied from Project Monterey wasn’t in fact copied from there. It was original code IBM wrote and contributed to Monterey (while retaining the copyrights) and then subsequently contributed to Linux (which they had every right to do because the license granted to Monterey wasn’t exclusive).

The only reason the lawsuit ended with a settlement was that SCO had lost on every argument and gone bankrupt, so there was no money to pay any judgement against them. I suspect some of the terms of that settlement are going to come back to bite Xinuos, because SCO had managed what everyone had considered impossible: they’d not only angered IBM enough they were out for blood, they’d managed to get IBM’s law firm (Cravath, Swaine and Moore, who are a big name) personally angry at them too. I’m fairly sure there’s terms in that settlement expressly to make sure that dead horse stays dead and buried. Given that Xinuos isn’t bankrupt, and some of the figures behind SCO and the original lawsuit were involved with them last I heard, I expect IBM’s attorneys to make great white sharks look cute and cuddly by comparison.

Re:Respecting copyright is an important part of FO

By belmolis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
As I recall in discovery it turned out that SCO had actually hired an expert to compare its code to Linux and he had reported that he was unable to find any overlap. The SCO claims to own Linux code were in bad faith.

Secret Claude Tracker Shocks Users After Anthropic’s Anti-Surveillance Stance

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Anthropic quickly removed a tracker secretly monitoring Claude Code users in China after a security researcher exposed the hidden code and condemned the spyware-like tracking as a “serious breach of user trust.” Last week, a web developer known as “Thereallo” was researching privacy issues in Claude Code and was shocked to find that the AI firm was using “prompt steganography” to hide code that tracks Chinese users “in plain sight.” This code wasn’t malicious, but it was sending information to Anthropic that most users wouldn’t detect, relying on shorthand markers to quietly flag users’ timezone, proxy, and potential connection to Chinese AI labs that Anthropic has accused of distillation attacks.

On X, Anthropic engineer Thariq Shihipar confirmed that the tracker was added to Claude Code as an “experiment” in March. According to Shihipar, the code “was meant to prevent account abuse from unauthorized resellers and protect against distillation.” Regarding the former, The Washington Post found unauthorized retailers have sold access to free models for $1 a month, and pro subscriptions that can cost $100 monthly sell for “as little as $12.” Supposedly, Anthropic has “actually been meaning to take this down for a while,” Shihipar said of the hidden code, because engineers have “landed stronger mitigations since then.”

Privacy advocates were not happy with the explanation, though, warning that the code is evidence that Anthropic is willing to cross lines to surveil users. That’s perhaps especially surprising, considering that Anthropic riled the Trump administration by refusing to allow the US government to use Claude to surveil US users. The AI firm has since sued the White House over the clash. The Post suggested that the tracker incident is a sign that US firms like Anthropic are taking “increasingly aggressive measures” to block Chinese AI firms from copying their models. A more defensive stance has apparently become critical. In the past year, Chinese firms have “consistently matched” US firms’ model capabilities “within months,” the Post reported. Most recently, “a new, free AI model from Chinese company Zhipu AI was better at finding computer vulnerabilities than Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.8 model, which was released in May,” the Post reported.

lol

By Bahbus • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

No user should be trusting any AI company and, likewise, users of AI (specifically the company’s own web based version) should not expect any kind of real privacy.

Place your bets

By nehumanuscrede • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The odds of Anthropic only using this for Chinese users is quite low.

I would be more surprised if the public " AI " systems like Claude aren’t tracking everything and everyone.
Regardless of what country they are in.

But, like usual, anytime they get caught, they will simply blame some junior engineer or claim this was developer
code that accidentally made it into production.

Privacy Policy

By DarkOx • Score: 3 Thread

Woha! a tech firm overstated their position on privacy and spied on users! I guess it is a day ending in ‘y’

Distillation Attack

By OzJimbob • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Distillation Attack? What? That’s some deliberately chosen language. Can the fact that companies like Anthropic and OpenAi scraped up an entire internet’s worth of private and copyrighted data to build their own models, be called a “Training Attack”?

Ask the web administrators who have to deal with the constant barrage of AI scraper bots, they would surely agree.

If there’s any worthwhile direction in AI, it’s creating smaller, more efficient models. Distillation is the only path forward.

Microsoft Lays Off Nearly 5,000 Employees Across Xbox, Commercial Sales

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Microsoft is laying off about 4,800 employees, including 1,600 from Xbox, as it restructures around AI investments and tries to reset its struggling gaming business. “Our business is changing because the world around it is changing. The way technology is built, deployed, and used is transforming faster than at any point in my time here,” said Amy Coleman, EVP and chief people officer at Microsoft. “Our customers’ needs are shifting, the business models that serve them are shifting, and that means the work itself — what we do, where we focus, and how we’re organized — has to transform too.” She continued: “Companies don’t get to choose whether their industry changes; they only get to choose whether they change with it. That means we will need to adjust resources and roles and shift how we operate so we can have the greatest impact for our customers.” TechCrunch reports:
Coleman stressed that the roles being eliminated today “are not being replaced by AI,” but noted, “what is true is that AI is changing how work gets done.” “Some of the tasks we do every day can now be automated, and that means we all need to keep learning, keep building new skills, and keep adapting as the work evolves,” Coleman wrote. […] Speaking about the Xbox layoffs, Coleman said little: “We are restructuring to position the business for long-term success. Engineering teams across the company will also evolve their structure and priorities to meet customer needs and innovate for the future.”

Of today’s 4,800 layoffs at Microsoft, 1,600 will hit Xbox, with about 3,200 cuts in total expected through fiscal year 2027, according to Asha Sharma, CEO of Xbox. In an email she sent to employees on Monday, Sharma called this “the most significant restructure in Xbox history.” “Our business today is not healthy,” Sharma wrote. “We are operating at margins that are 3-10x lower than comparable platform and publishing businesses.” She added that Xbox made bets like its monthly subscription service Game Pass, alongside moves to grow its portfolio of content and invest in multi-platform, among other attempts to breathe life into the business. None of those strategies grew at the expected pace, leading to the core business weakening even as Xbox added more teams and investment. “And now the industry is facing the most severe hardware crisis in its history,” Sharma said. “We must reset Xbox.”

As part of the shift, Microsoft will transition four of its gaming studios to operate under new management, ensuring preservation of intellectual property and ongoing projects. Specifically Compulsion Games and Double Fine Productions will return to independent studios, according to Sharma. Ninja Theory and Undead Labs are coming under new ownership with funding to complete and grow some of their more popular games. According to Sharma’s memo, Xbox is also flattening management hard, cutting the current 14 management layers to no more than five, but ideally three. As part of this major organization redesign, Xbox is making longtime executive Helen Chiang chief operating officer with end-to-end profit and loss authority across content, hardware, platform, and services. Xbox’s restructuring plan centers around narrowing focus by dropping sprawling creative bets that don’t produce platform-scale returns, and instead homing in on core strategic pillars like Mojang and King, the businesses behind Minecraft and Candy Crush.

How Wonderfully Myopic

By Spinlock_1977 • Score: 4 Thread

“Our business is changing because the world around it is changing.”

More like you tried to push products on people (Windows 11) and companies (CoPilot) that they didn’t want. Worse, you did it as a money-grab, and smacked xbox down for good measure.

I guess the Microsoft of old has returned; this time, with myopic vision.

“Our business is changing”…

By wakeboarder • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

The business sucks. At the advent of computer games, they were primarily designed to be fun by creative types. Then the businessmen came in an went full commercial. Games are now designed to serve up ads, generate revenue through loot boxes and any other psychological trick they can come up with to manipulate gamers through games. Now they are trying to completely control the industry and turn it into a monopoly so they can control everything, but I guess it didn’t work like they planned.

Re:First to admit it is not AI

By SoftwareArtist • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

How do you get 1,600 surplus people working on game development?

By buying studios left and right. According to Wikipedia Xbox includes over 30 studios in 17 countries. Now consider that each studio is usually developing multiple games at once, and a single AAA game can involve hundreds of people.

They couldn’t convince developers to make games exclusive to Xbox, so they threw money at the problem and bought the companies. They hoped this would make Xbox the dominant gaming platform. It didn’t work.

4 products

By ahoffer0 • Score: 3 Thread

MS has 4 really successful products: Windows, Office, Active Directory, and SQL Server. Those cash cows have paid for all the marginal crap like Zune, Windsor phones, Surface, HoloLens, Cortana, and even Xbox.

I always wait a generation. Still happy with my…

By Qbertino • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

… Xbox One X. Awesome machine. Console affordable, games dirt cheap, all the bugs ironed out. I’ll be getting the Xbox Series X when that drops in price … which is likely not going to happen for a while but is totally fine by me. I still have plenty games to play on my current main console.

I always wait until the end of a generation before I buy. I’ve still got 80+ games, most of them unplayed. Even my Xbox 360 library is half unused. Someday I want to finish the Orange Box on that one.

Nintendo Switch 2 Is Getting a Replaceable Battery in Europe

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Nintendo will stop selling the original Switch in Europe in mid-February 2027, nearly 10 years after the console’s launch. In its place, the company will release updated versions of the Switch 2 and several controllers with user-replaceable batteries to comply with new EU regulations. The Verge reports:
The news comes as Nintendo is making a bunch of changes to the rest of its lineup due to EU regulations requiring user-replaceable batteries. Starting this summer, the company says it will start introducing updated versions of various devices on “a rolling basis,” ahead of the regulations coming into effect on February 18th, 2027. “There is no difference in functionality between current products and revised products containing user-replaceable batteries,” Nintendo says.

The Switch 2 is the most notable product being updated — the new version is expected to start rolling out in the fall — but there will also be versions of the Joy-Con controllers, Joy-Con 2, Switch 2 Pro Controller, and N64 and GameCube Switch controllers with user-replaceable batteries. “Due to a variety of factors, revised products may not become available in all European countries simultaneously,” Nintendo notes.

It must be quite a redesign

By necro81 • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Here is iFixit’s guide for replacing the Switch 2 battery (last updated 9 May 2026). It is not a simple procedure - harder even than most smartphones I’ve had to deal with. JIS 00 screwdriver, head and prying to remove stickers, more screws, snap features to pry open - all just to get the case open. Then more screws, unplugging and removing components, some solvent to (hopefully) loosen the battery glue, so that by Step 36 you’ve removed the old one. A few more steps to install the new one, re-apply thermal paste (?!), reinstall and reconnect the internals, snap the case back together, reinstall fasteners, reapply stickers (if they hold!). Only 63 steps - piece of cake!

Changing this to make for an easy user replacement will be a substantial redesign. And this is all to the good.

Re:One of the advantages of the EU

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

EU technical regulations are not just there to replace power bricks with confusing and utterly incompatible USB-C variants, they can make sensible decisions, too.

At no point did the EU technical regulation ever propose anything confusing or incompatible. Quite the opposite, they stipulated that compliant products must all negotiate using the same USB-PD mechanism.

Your actual complaint is shitty products not following the regulations. Just how are regulations supposed to fix that?

The obvious next step would be to promote a fixed number of standard battery sizes.

No that would be truly dumb. Custom battery sizes are credited as a major factor in scale down of electronics. There’s a reason even the EU stopped short of requiring *all* batteries to be replaceable and only stipulated the requirement for certain devices with a certain degree of replaceability.

Re:Let me guess it will not come to America

By gweihir • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I would expect it will eventually come to the US as well, because manufacturing two versions is just more expensive. Kind of like RoHS came to the US effectively. But it may take a few years.

Americans of All Ages Are Spending Less Time Socializing

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Americans now spend an average of 35 minutes a day socializing, down from 45 minutes two decades ago, according to American Time Use Survey data. The decline spans all age groups but is sharpest among 15- to 24-year-olds, whose daily socializing has fallen from about an hour to 35 minutes. Axios reports:
Sociologists and psychologists point to several trends driving this phenomenon, which Substack writer Derek Thompson dubbed “The Anti-Social Century” in the Atlantic last year. We’re all on our smartphones, often interacting through screens instead of face to face — even though social media is no substitute for spending time together in person.

Teens, in particular, spend an average of 4.8 hours a day on apps like TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat, according to Gallup. The shift to remote work — and life — during the pandemic has persisted, keeping more of us homebound. Longer-term trends are reshaping daily life in ways that make isolation easier. Homes are bigger and more comfortable, with larger TVs. Virtually every restaurant is on a food delivery app, making it easier than ever to stay in.

Also contributing to the trend is the decline of gathering spaces, Axios’ Avery Lotz writes. A 2025 report from CU Boulder researchers uncovered widespread closures of all kinds of hangout spots — from libraries to coffee shops to museums — in the last decade or so. Churches are also shuttering at unprecedented rates, Axios’ Russell Contreras reports.

Looking at it the other way.

By alvinrod • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
Look at this from the opposite direction. How much excess socializing was done in the past because people didn’t have anything else or didn’t own a personal time-occupying device that didn’t require sharing?

All this shows is that when given the choice, people choose their own interests over shared socialization. If previous generations had phones and tablets they wouldn’t have talked to their uncle about mundane shit on Thanksgiving either. I don’t think people have changed all that much, we just have more options now and this is identifying our actual preferences.

Did we miss something?

By mitchy • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

How is *cost* not a major line item in this discussion? Concerts are unaffordable. Sporting events are unaffordable. Amusement parks are unaffordable. And those are the easy big-ticket items.

Part of the reason all the “hangout-y” places are going out of business is because nobody is going, but is that due to lack of interest or unsustainable costs?

Re:Looking at it the other way.

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Maybe…

However the previous generation certainly could have a novel in their back pocket, a magazine, a comic book, flipped the radio on, etc. It is not like Apple invented personal entertainment in 2007.

Something IS different about they way interact with smart phone and related technologies. Centuries, of anthropological study says humans are social animals. It is hard just go whoops they must have all been wrong, turns out we just did not have good enough portable video games and mobiles, and people just spent time together because they hadn’t anything better to do!

Obviously the only answer is we will have to do the science somehow ultimately. Still I find a hypothesis that we just did not have something more stimulating than talking to uncle Marty about old dodge pickup grandad “forced” him to drive in high-school is the reason we did not previously tend to all retire to our own corner as readily.

It sure seems like we are getting ‘something’ out of these connected devices that meeting or making us feel our needs are being meet.

Cost

By JBMcB • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
I can go over to my friend’s house for free. Our neighbors come over to our patio for free, too. Sometimes we make pies. If you want to get really technical, though:

Nominal cost for a nice pie on the patio:
Tub of raspberries on sale (in season) at Costco: $6
Sugar, flour, salt: I’d estimate $1, but I’ll be generous and say $2
Coffee - 2lbs bag from Costco usually costs around $16 and makes about 15 big pots of coffee, so $1
So that’s, rounding up, $10 to entertain about 8 people, or about $1.25 a person. I’d say that’s doable for most people, it just takes some time.

The people who *responded*

By Kevin108 • Score: 5, Funny Thread

only socialize for 35 minutes a day. They have more free time, but they spend it participating in surveys.

Fines Doubled As Teens Outsmart Australia’s Social Media Ban

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
Australia plans to double fines for social media platforms that fail to keep under-16s off restricted services, after regulators found 70% of children with accounts remained active three months after the ban took effect. The government says the changes will also give the eSafety Commissioner more power to demand information from platforms and age-assurance providers as teens continue finding ways around the law. Euronews reports:
The government said Sunday it would introduce draft legislation this week doubling the maximum penalty to 99 million Australian dollars (63 million euros) for platforms — including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok — that do not take reasonable steps to comply with the ban, which became law on 10 December. Communications Minister Anika Wells blamed the platforms directly. “We can all agree we would like the scheme to work better than it is currently, but that is on Big Tech taking the Mickey,” she said, speaking to the Australian Broadcasting Corp on Monday. Wells added that she had received monthly updates from the online safety regulator since March and “we are not seeing improvements.”

The amendments would also expand the powers of eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant to demand information and documents from platforms — and from third parties such as age assurance technology providers — to test claims made by companies about how under-16s continued to circumvent the ban. The government had initially reported more than 5 million children had accounts removed, deactivated or restricted after the legislation passed. But eSafety found in March that 70% of children who held accounts on restricted platforms on the day the ban took effect remained active on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok.

Inman Grant said in April she was considering court action against those platforms and YouTube, alleging they were not taking reasonable steps to exclude children. She said she was satisfied with progress made by the remaining restricted platforms: X, Kick, Reddit, Threads and Twitch. Senior opposition lawmaker Jane Hume said her party would consider supporting the reforms, but pinned blame on the original legislation. “The legislation was clearly undercooked in the first place. The eSafety Commissioner wasn’t given the powers to be able to pursue these Big Tech companies,” she said.

Re:Surely

By Orly0101 • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
This is like saying there is a better way to stop crime: “it’s called being honest, but no one wants to do it”. You have a jail because not all people will be honest, and you have to protect the children because not everyone will do parenting.
But you are wrong about something. Just like it is false to say everyone is dishonest, it is false to say no one wants to do parenting. You don’t have to do something about it because everyone is a bad parent, but because of them are.

However, I don’t believe that forbidding access to social networks is actually protecting them. This just feels as an excuse for having more control over people.

This just further isolates kids

By flink • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

My experience is the US, mind, not AU, so things are probably somewhat different there. But with that caveat in mind: At least on school days, the ONLY social interaction my 10 year old son gets with his peers is online through “social media”. I’ve sent him outside to “bike around the neighborhood and find someone to play with” and he reported that there wasn’t anyone. I walked around with him and sure enough, the streets were deserted @ 3:00 on a weekday afternoon. All the kids are kept inside or at some structured after school activity. If I want him to go to a friend’s house that is not in walking distance my wife or I have to take time off to drive him there and pick him up. In my day you could just hop on your friend’s bus and get off at his stop with him, but they don’t allow that anymore (even with a not from the parents: I checked with the school).

Now that it is summer, everyone is in “camp”, so again, no playmates if you don’t also send your kid to “camp”. I guess no one fucks around in each other’s yard, plays pickup baseball, or goes fishing anymore. I’ve tried to raise my kids to have active independent childhoods, but without the network effect of other parents giving their kids the same freedoms, it just ain’t happening.

So his friend group mostly coordinates through discord on their iPads to play minecraft and other online activities together as their main form of play. I understand that a lot of these social media platforms are not healthy for kids, but for many it is their ONLY outlet. To the extent social media gets regulated, it should be to curb predatory practices by the platform. That plus good parenting and supervision should be sufficient. But an outright ban is overkill.

Re:Surely

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Have you tried it?

Parenting in a world where kids face unlimited temptation to consume things that you believe are harmful to them paired with near instance access all over the damn place is pretty hard.

In ever previous era, with every previous vice society has agreed to put at least some barriers in front of children and to do so in a mostly if not perfect way. Most 8 year olds cannot simply go get a case a beer anytime they want, and if they do there is ample opportunity for parents to find out about. You know if your two young child is running with inappropriate people and you either do something or don’t.

Same thing with other things like smoking, hazardous materials, etc. The book shop won’t let your kid into the adults only section…
but here is the important but, you CAN still let your child take their bicycle and pocket money and go to the c-store, bookstore, etc and get some candy and comics/pokemon cards etc. They can go an interface with the world in a safe way.

Now try this online… At best you get parental controls on the platform, which may or may not reflect what YOU the parent feels is or is not fit for your child, but rather what someone at Meta decided was fine. Things like youtube-kids, ok but nothing stops them from just watching as a guest. Sure you can lock down their phone, but you have control over the library PC, their friend bobby’s tablet, etc. Thanks to ‘privacy and security’ which we all know is really just about DRM you can’t implement your own parental controls without entirely breaking the web and apps, and smart devices.

You are left with accepting mega corps get to put whatever they want in front of your kids eyes, infantalizing them entirely and/or never letting them touch anything electronic without your shoulder surfing.

The status quo is an should be treated as unacceptable. The privacy and expression concerns should be the problems to solve rather than reasons to toss our hands up. Anyone just saying ‘parent harder’ should should get busted in the teeth!

This felony screams for hard punishment

By yanestra • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Hard and harsh punishment was always the solution - without it, Australia wouldn’t even be populated.

Re: Surely

By Kernel Kurtz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Kids are learning how the internet works.

They are also learning government is something that frequently needs to be worked around. A lesson that will serve them well their entire lives.