Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Democracy vs Digital Infrastructure: Pulitzer-Winning Journalist Charts ‘The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State’
  2. The Brain Is Actually Two Completely Separate Organs
  3. To Enforce Its Proposed Social Media Ban for 450 Million Pre-Teens, EU Builds an Open Source App
  4. Tech Industry Scratches Its Head Over Trump’s ‘AI Force’ Proposal
  5. Customer-Losing Flock Now Offers Buyouts to Avoid Laying Off Employees
  6. Developer Abandons ‘PS5 Linux’ Project After Sony Patches AI-Discovered Exploit
  7. Fake AI Intelligence Almost Made the US Military Start a War With China
  8. US Air Force F-16 Crashes in Michigan After Pentagon Orders More Flyovers
  9. Gemini Breached Three Outside Systems, and Claude-Using Researchers Breached OpenAI
  10. Has the James Web Space Telescope Discovered a New ‘Black Hole Star’?
  11. AI Insiders Issue New Warnings - Including Former Anthropic Engineer Jacob Coxon
  12. Will California Gut Its Net Neutrality Law to Comply with Trump Admin Demands?
  13. Rust is Now a ‘Tier One’ Language at Microsoft
  14. Journalist Calls Out ‘Collective Amnesia’ of Schools’ Romance With Big Tech Over AI
  15. America Acknowledges for the First Time: It Has Deployed Weapons In Space

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Democracy vs Digital Infrastructure: Pulitzer-Winning Journalist Charts ‘The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State’

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State ultimately asks the question, “How did we cede control of our democracy to the machines, and can we get it back?” according to the Harvard’s Arts and Sciences site, FAS Current:
The new title finds Lepore, who used to teach a course at the College titled “The Rise and Fall of the Machine,” charting the ascent of what she calls the artificial state: the digital communication infrastructure by which governments and private corporations automate and ultimately control public discourse. Following her Pulitzer Prize win for "We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution" (2025), “I wanted to think about whether liberal constitutional democracies can survive this moment in time,” Lepore shared in a phone interview…

[In the “current ChatGPT moment”] Lepore found herself asking: “Who are the people who are clamoring to be replaced by machines, to have movies made by machines, and novels written by machines?” And who, she continued, is pushing for our government to be determined by these machines? In the book, Lepore notes that technological tools are increasingly influencing elections around the world… However, she sees the 2026 U.S. midterms as an inflection point. In a recent piece in the Financial Times, Lepore wrote, “This year marks the first AI election. Voters are asking chatbots how they should vote. Campaigns and activists are using AI to analyze the electorate, send micro-targeted messages, produce tailored ads and even deepfakes....”

Lepore stresses in the book that “nobody should trust historians to make predictions,” but she believes it’s possible for democratic citizens to wrest back control. Referencing proposals such as New York’s data center moratorium law, Lepore ends by describing a “growing and increasingly noisy tech backlash.”

“It’s not foreordained. This isn’t inevitable,” she said during the interview.
“In the book’s epilogue Lepore predicts, as her title suggests, a fall of the Artificial State,” writes the California Review of Books. “That argument turns out to be speculative, much more of a hope than a certainty.”
[Lepore] does support her prediction by positing that the Artificial State is “poorly designed and badly built,” that it has not given people safety and happiness but rather a prison of glowing screens, and that a majority of Americans want more control over AI. To escape the Artificial State we will have to imagine a different future by gaining more knowledge of the past in a search for meaning. Of course, powerful forces want to deny that and turn us into servile automatons.
The Guardian adds that “While Lepore interprets much classic sci-fi, such as Isaac Asimov, as cautionary, she observes that “the architects of the Artificial State seem to have read these stories, unironically, as instruction manuals, guides for how to build robots that would one day rule the world”. (The Atlantic writes that “What one gathers from these misreadings is not so much that science fiction itself is nefarious, but that arrested development might be…”)

But The Indian Express writes that despite the author’s bleak conclusion, “Lepore is not a pessimist. Because the Artificial State is a construct, neither alive, nor truly indestructible, she argues it is still possible to take it apart… [T]his is a clear-eyed reckoning rather than a doomsday tract. It is not an easy read, but an essential one for anyone unsettled by the pace of the AI wave.”

The Brain Is Actually Two Completely Separate Organs

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“New research led by Stanford Medicine reveals that what we call the brain is two distinct organs that evolved independently over hundreds of millions of years,” Stanford Medicine announced this week:
The new research finding shows that the human brain consists of two ancient nervous systems cleverly packaged together — a more primitive part that regulates our hearts’ beating, our breathing and other functions, and another that makes us distinctly human, capable of poetry, mathematics and wondering about our own origins. The discovery could help explain why scientists have struggled for decades to grow certain types of brain cells in the laboratory — and it opens new avenues for studying devastating diseases that affect the brain stem…

[S]cientists have struggled for decades to generate human hindbrain neurons in the laboratory. This gap has hampered research into devastating diseases affecting the brain stem, including spinal muscular atrophy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis… The researchers’ breakthrough came from studying the earliest moments of embryonic development… [Study co-authors Carolyn Dundes and Rayyan Jokhai] discovered that the hindbrain follows a separate developmental path, running in parallel to — rather than branching off from — the pathway that creates the forebrain and midbrain… This revelation explained decades of frustration in the field — scientists had been trying to turn one type of progenitor cell into another that it is fundamentally incapable of becoming… Armed with this knowledge, the researchers for the first time successfully coaxed human pluripotent stem cells (a kind of cell that can create any cell in the human body) to become functional hindbrain motor neurons in the laboratory…

Finally, the researchers looked back over 550 million years of evolutionary time. They found the same two-origin brain pattern in chickens; zebrafish; and, remarkably, in acorn worms, tiny creatures living on the ocean floor that share a distant common ancestor with humans. Jellyfish, which diverged from humans about 600 to 700 million years ago, have two nervous systems at different ends of their body. “Our research suggests that evolution took two existing neural systems and pushed them together spatially,” Loh said. “Having the brain as one organ would probably be more efficient, but we rely on this primordial way to make the brain as two separate pieces.”
Thanks to Slashdot reader Beeftopia for sharing the article.

Not quite …

By SpinyNorman • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It’s been known for a while that the nervous system of animals started out as separate front/sensory and rear/motor+autonomic-functions, and in humans we see the same gene expression markers in front/back (fore/midbrain vs hindbrain aka brainstem) as we see in primitive animals such as the acorn worm where these remain far more separate.

What this new research shows isn’t that our brain originated as two organs/systems, but rather that it still goes through that stage during embryonic development rather than having been more fundamentally fused into one earlier in our evolutionary history as had been believed to be the case.

It’s yet another case (cf human embryo having a tail, chicken embryo having teeth) of “Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny” whereby embryonic development does through the same steps as evolution did.

Only two?

By TwistedGreen • Score: 3, Informative Thread

I thought this was common knowledge? The so-called “reptilian” brain and the “Paleomammalian” or limbic system of the triune brain theory made for some great pop psychology.

Interesting that it pans out on the actual cellular level, though.

I’ve always envied neurological researchers. Chopping up brains all day sounds like fun.

Re:Only two?

By SpinyNorman • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

The front/back split this research is about has nothing to do with reptilian vs human brain - it is about brainstem (back) vs rest (front), and reptiles have both parts combined just like us.

You have to go way back in evolution, to the pre-chordates, to find this mostly separated front vs back dual nervous system. In all the vertebrates, including fish and reptiles, the two systems are already combined (at least in the post-developmental stage).

You can still also see it in a few modern descendants of the pre-chordates such as jellyfsh and the acorn worm.

Huh.

By Type44Q • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

…and another that makes us distinctly human, capable of poetry, mathematics and wondering about our own origins

Someone’s never been to Oklahoma.

Re: Not quite …

By Viol8 • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Stop cut and pasting AI slop you moron, it doesnt make you look smart. We re quite capable of quizzing an LLM ourselves.

To Enforce Its Proposed Social Media Ban for 450 Million Pre-Teens, EU Builds an Open Source App

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The European Commission “proposed on Thursday banning children under 13 from social media, with parent-supervised accounts until 15,” reports Reuters.

“Enforcement would rely on a tool Brussels built itself” — a free, open-source age verification smartphone app “that tells a platform whether a user meets an age threshold without revealing their identity…”
If passed, the proposed Kids Act would create the world’s largest social media access restriction, covering 450 million people across 27 countries… [The EU-built age-verification app] is being rolled out through member states, with seven pilot countries: Cyprus, Denmark, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy and Spain. The Commission expects EU-wide availability by the end of 2026.

It will also be used to prove users are over 18 when accessing adult sites, a restriction already implemented under the Digital Services Act…

[T]he system itself is decentralised. Member states run it through issuers they designate, and the proofs live on the user’s phone. There is no central EU database of ages or of who verified whom… A user proves their age once to a nationally designated issuer — a body vetted by the member state, which can be a digital ID provider, a bank or a post office. At a restricted site, the app certifies that the user is above the required age threshold. The platform receives only a yes-or-no response. Issuance and verification are handled by separate entities. The proof provider is not told which service the proof was used for. Each proof works only once, preventing cross-service tracking. No identity documents or biometric data are retained. The code is open-source, allowing independent scrutiny.

The significance of the EU approach is that it provides a common age-verification mechanism rather than leaving individual platforms to develop and enforce their own systems. “Online platforms can easily rely on our age verification app. So there are no more excuses,” [EU Commission President Ursula] von der Leyen said…

The proposal must be approved by EU member states and the European Parliament before becoming law.
Non-compliance would risk fines of up to 6% of a tech company’s global annual sales, plus supervisory fees, Reuters reported earlier. The EU’s plan follows similar initiatives in Australia, Britain, China, India, Turkey and several European Union countries.

Re:Have they heard of a PC?

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The same way your online banking website runs on your PC but verifies your login via an app. App based digital handshakes are a thing, not just for 2FA, but for all sorts of certifications.

Remember you’re using a service, the service is responsible for implementing it. I suspect social media sites being social media sites will simply get users to use the app on their phone once or handshake via a QR code.

Re:Goodbye

By test321 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You visit an online liquor store. The store asks your mobile phone whether you are of sufficient age. Your mobile phone asks the issuer, gets a yes/no token, forwards it to the liquor store. No data was leaked.

In countries where the issuer is “the bank”, then in any case both the liquor and the bank already knew everything (the online liquor store already knew your payment details, and your bank already knew you make purchases at the online liquor store).

Re:Goodbye

By Rei • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Except not to you. You’re confusing data minimization (the website doesn’t get your name from the token) with unlinkability (nobody can connect your activity to your identity). The *token itself* doesn’t reveal your identity, but it leaks data in a wide variety of ways.

Even if you browse via a proxy, if the authorization service gets a token directly from your phone, it has now correlated your phone with your proxy-browsed history. A very common means to do secure authentication these days is SIM-based wireless PKI, wheren it has now connected you to your phone number. To governments, it offers a broad range of brand new vectors to correlate you to an identity if you, say, mention you had an abortion or criticize your local strongman leader, since they control the backend infrastructure that establishes the connection between the token and the identity. And not just at signup time every real-world digital credential must be able to be revoked if the phone is lost or stolen, or credentials expire or are revoked. So how does how does the open-source app prove a credential is still valid without “phoning home”? If the app checks a revocation status list, then ISPs, CDNs, or state security services can correlate the exact millisecond of queries to the revocation server with the submission of a verification token to a platform - each time it’s submitted. Assuming that they can’t just get it with more direct means than timing attacks.

Also, you cannot just “read the code”. The frontend is open source, but what is being done on the backend is not. You have no clue what logging polciies, database schemas, operational security, etc the “designated national issuers” or servers handling the credential revocation are using, and what government intrusion has been forced on them. I’d feel a more comfortable if it were all happening from Brussels but handing it over to individual states, some of which at any given point will be authoritarian, is just handing them an easy new vector to unmask people.

As for your “Such systems are implemented in many different ways by member states for other purposes already.” - yes, for filing taxes, healthcare, online baking, etc - things that you intend to do and must do under your legal identity. Not for anonymous conversations on the internet. Your argument basically reverts to “But people already do things non-anoymously on the internet , which reinforces my point that yes, this taking something from the “anonymous” category and putting it into the “easily unmasked” category.

If you think this won’t be abused, I cannot help you. Not even just abused from a criminal or extrajudicial perspective, but even from a civil one, because orders to unmask someone can be subpoenaed.

Re: Well ....

By OrangeTide • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Failure to achieve perfect compliance is not actually failure. I think anyone with a few braincells knows that a law is not perfect and will not stop every instance of a behavior.

Re:Goodbye

By thegarbz • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

it has now correlated your phone with your proxy-browsed history.

You’re making wild assumptions into the implementation. There’s no reason the authorisation service needs to have any information about your network condition. But since we’re talking about an open source implementation the actual process can be verified, even if the direct application cannot.

To governments, it offers a broad range of brand new vectors to correlate you to an identity if you, say, mention you had an abortion or criticize your local strongman leader, since they control the backend infrastructure that establishes the connection between the token and the identity.

Yes I agree this system won’t work well in shitholes like Russia, China, or the USA, but in the meantime we have actual evidence that the vast majority of European nations which do have privacy rules for citizens find themselves repeatedly hamstrung by the fact that attempts to breach them land them in constitutional hot water. I get it Americans (rightfully so) think laws aren’t worth anything anymore, but the reality in other western countries is no where near as bad.

Tech Industry Scratches Its Head Over Trump’s ‘AI Force’ Proposal

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Saturday morning President Trump announced he’s creating an AI task force and appointing an AI czar, reports Politico.

“I am forming the AI Force, much like I did Space Force, which has been a tremendous SUCCESS,” Trump wrote Saturday in what Politico earlier described as “a lengthy Truth Social post on Saturday morning.”
TRUMP: Over the years, there have been many Hoaxes, all generated by the Radical Left Dumocrats, for purposes of destroying our Country. RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, UKRAINE, UKRAINE, UKRAINE, Global Warming, Impeachment Hoax #1, Impeachment Hoax #2 […] and now, the decimation, or destruction, of AI, commonly known as Artificial Intelligence — And I, as President of the United States, will not stand by and let this happen.

It all began with an attack on our Data Centers, until people realized how wealthy and prestigious they were for the Communities in which they were built. Higher Salaries, Lower Taxes, and Safer Streets, was the result, and the crazed Data Center attack has largely failed, so now […] they are going straight at AI. We will not in any way hinder or stifle the Growth of this incredible Industry. Rather, we will cherish it, help it, and watch over it, as it grows!

However, we will also be looking for BAD, and we can do that, very easily, with our already existing Criminal and Civil Justice System. For this purpose, I am forming the AI Force, much like I did Space Force, which has been a tremendous SUCCESS, in my First Term. To that end, I will be announcing, in the near future, the AI “Czar” — Only High I.Q. individuals need apply!
Trump concluded by saying AI “is the next Industrial Revolution, or Internet, but will be even larger and more impactful… We are leading China, and the rest of the World, and I intend to keep it that way!” But what exactly is AI Force? “The White House did not immediately respond to a request to clarify whether the agency would be military or civilian,” notes the Washington Post. So now “The tech industry is struggling to make sense of President Donald Trump’s surprise announcement,” Politico reported Saturday afternoon:
Four representatives for the sector, who were granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly, told POLITICO that the industry was not widely informed of Trump’s decision prior to the Truth Social post. “Nobody knows what the idea even is,” one of the people said. Another said that feedback on the idea was not widely solicited within the industry. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment…

“I think that he clearly feels pressure to say something, but he’s torn because he’s just spent the last few days saying that the whole thing is a hoax,” Adam Kovacevich, CEO of the progressive tech industry coalition Chamber of Progress, said of Trump and his prior dismissal of AI doomsday scenarios. Since the departure of David Sacks, who stepped down as the Trump administration’s previous AI czar earlier this year, the White House has been “making up AI policy as it goes,” Kovacevich added. “I think it’s clear they’ve really missed the presence of an organized leader like David Sacks was.”

One of the tech industry representatives said they were confused about whether the task force would be charged with formulating more AI regulations or recommending policies that would further stimulate the tech’s development. Taylor Barkley, director of federal government affairs at the industry-aligned Abundance Institute, is eyeing it as a way to solidify a light-touch government approach to the technology he says will foster innovation. “Any AI Force or AI Czar should have one job: keep the field open so entrepreneurs at every scale can compete, free from onerous regulation,” he told POLITICO. “Existing criminal and civil law can handle bad actors. New permission regimes will stifle the very activity America needs most.”
It’s worth noting that the day before, California’s governor made an announcement. “With Donald Trump and Congress asleep at the wheel, Governor Gavin Newsom is once again taking the lead to strengthen AI safety for all Americans,” the governor’s office announced Friday. Newsom issued a strong executive order convening experts to help California create new AI safety laws and reporting rules, possibly even requiring safety auditors embedded in labs and emergency “kill switches” in frontier models.

The US is cooked

By Rumagent • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Electing this orange embarrassment not once, but twice. Threatening long time allies all over the world, rim jobbing dictators everywhere and losing wars to 3rd rate countries. FFS.

free speech

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
And now in the news, “free speech” loving trump has banned CNN from the whitehouse. Republicans think free speech means they don’t have to pay to tell people what to do.

Avoiding bubble collapse consequences

By puzzled • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The AI industry has blown a spectacular bubble via circular dealing - Nvidia, OpenAI, Oracle, Microsoft, CoreWeave, etc are all doing monopoly money deals. Nvidia “sells” some GPUs, then “invests” the proceeds back into OpenAI, nothing got done, no money changed hands, but their stock values zoom. This looks exactly like the Dotcom bubble in the late 1990s and such things always implode - the market doesn’t just correct, it panics, it liquidates, nobody can tell what’s real, so everything is for sale at pennies on the dollar.

The industry’s strategy to not go to prison for this stunt is to make AI equivalent to nuclear weapons. When the bubble begins to burst, the Trump administration will “make a deal”, what you see is the beginning of that process. This will work about as well as the attempt to shake down Iran for their oil, but cause and effect are not the Trump administration’s strong suit.

Re:Seriously…

By jacks smirking reven • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Democrats dismissing and forgetting the considerable party lunacy that ultimately created President Donald Trump and elected the man again, is worse.

And this is why I 110% advocate for and support Democrats going after the conservative institutions the way the Trump admin went after law firms and universities. Crypto, car dealerships, social media companies all some others to be investigated and heavily regulated and exposed. This system that creates these robots needs to be stopped.

The media environment and top-down Republican messaging apparatus is exactly why you think that sentence is true while at the same time providing zero examples and when you try and do it will just a series of regurgitated talking points and culture war. Watch this one try to justify that statement and there will be nothing substantive, just whatever today’s algorithm has served up.

Also notice how these dishonest children subtly already shifted to “well, you see, we were just forced to support Trump! You gave us no choice!”. Literally the Joker defense, you see they have no agency or brains of their own, why didn’t the Democrats take that into account?! “They can’t expect us to actually care about politics!”

Here’s the thing also to never let these folks forget: It was solely their choice to elect Trump over any other Republican. Desantis or Haley or just about anyone was favored against Biden in 2024 but they still picked Trump, even when Trump disrespects them so much to not even debate those opponents. He think so little of his supporters that he can just insult their intelligence and values and he was right to. We just have to do the same now.

Re:Other new military branchesâ¦

By lazarus • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I hope that after I die, the one word people use to describe me is “resurrected.”

I don’t recommend it.

Customer-Losing Flock Now Offers Buyouts to Avoid Laying Off Employees

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Mashable writes:
Flock Safety offered employees voluntary buyouts on Friday, WIRED reported… Without the buyouts, those familiar with the situation suspect the company would have to lay off some of its 1,500 employees.
WIRED writes that people familiar with the program “say they believe that a significant number of the startup’s roughly 1,500 employees may try to depart.”
Flock is making the severance offers as it continues to lose customers… The company has had many of its contracts either not extended or dropped this year, which could leave it short of revenue goals, according to two of the people. A wave of vandalism targeting its cameras has unexpectedly increased expenses. Without buyouts, Flock almost certainly would have to lay off some staff, one of the people believes… People familiar with Flock’s severance plan tell WIRED that some employees may take the offer amid speculation that the company, which has raised about $1.2 billion in venture capital, might resort to selling off parts or all of its business to stay afloat… One advocacy group identified 93 city and county governments that cut ties with Flock in August alone. Overall in 2026, roughly three times as many local governments have dropped Flock compared to the previous five years.

Flock has recently been building products that extend the company beyond its core license plate reader offering. WIRED reported last month that the company has developed AI-powered investigative software to identify drivers, find potential associates based on patterns of movement, and search across police records and other data. A separate WIRED analysis of Flock’s software found tools designed to continuously search camera feeds for people matching written descriptions. WIRED’s analysis of Flock’s code also found potential integrations with drones and other surveillance systems.
Flock’s financial scrambles might explain an incident in Syracuse, New York. The nonprofit news site Central Current discovered the city’s contract said its license plate data wouldn’t be shared outside the police department, reports Mashable:
But the department had granted access to other agencies, which police said was an accident. Over roughly a year, searches by officers around the country reached Syracuse’s data nearly 4.4 million times. And that wasn’t the only surprise in the paperwork. Central Current also found that Flock could keep using Syracuse data after the contract ended. When the city approved cameras from Axon to replace Flock’s, Flock said Syracuse couldn’t simply end its agreement early. It warned that the city might have to pay for both systems; so even as officials moved to replace the cameras, they faced questions about what Flock could do with the data and what the city might still owe.
Meanwhile, the Texas Department of Transportation “has stopped issuing permits allowing Flock cameras and other automated license plate readers to be installed along state roads…” reports the Texas Tribune. “There were an estimated 13,000 Flock cameras across Texas in August, but hundreds of the devices have been shut down after [governor] Abbott’s funding freeze.”

And in August Florida’s Republican Governor “ordered his state’s transportation department to remove the cameras from state roads, saying he didn’t want ‘a surveillance state.’"

Oh Noes!

By HeckRuler • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Won’t someone PLEASE think about the poor corporate overlords?

They’re only violating the constitution so that they can hire more employees!

And frankly, all the hate goes does for the next Flock company. Axon? They KNOW how much people hare their rights being violated and they’re doubling down on it?

DDSS

By markdavis • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

I am sure there are already other companies ready to jump in, to do the same thing. And in a few years, things will be right where they were before- perhaps worse.

The fight shouldn’t be against Flock. It should be against the concept of blanket surveillance, data retention/sharing, and using/searching that data without warrants. And that requires changing government legislation, budgets, and mindsets.

How extremely sad

By D,Petkow • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Highprofile stalking / harassment cases
Shively, Kentucky (2026) – Officer Asad Zahir allegedly ran 2,048 Flock searches on two vehicles tied to his child’s mother over ~5 months; 241 searches occurred while a protection order was active. Charged with official misconduct and unlawful computer access.

Fort Pierce, Florida (2025–26) – Former officer Josepher Crutchfield searched a woman’s plate 189 times in 8 months via Flock; she later filed a stalking protection order. Charged with felony unauthorized computer access.

Richmond County, Georgia (2023–25) – Deputy Jose Ferrer searched a single tag at least 1,146 times, entering reasons like “SUSPICIOUS” and “BOB.” Arrested for ALPR misuse and oath violations.

Milwaukee, Wisconsin (2025–26) – Officer Josue Ayala used Flock to learn his partner’s location 124 times and her ex’s 55 times; pleaded guilty to attempted misconduct. Weeks later, the internalaffairs detective investigating him, Tehrangi Chapman, was arrested for his own Flock/GPS stalking.

Amarillo, Texas (2026) – Former officer Christian Eder faces 78 misdemeanor counts for running a romantic rival’s plate 76 times with fake reasons.

San Jose, California (2026) – SJPD fired an officer who abused Flock to help his cousin track a woman who had accused the cousin of domestic violence; cited by advocates as a third CA ALPRstalking case.

Bibb County, Georgia (2026) – Three former sheriff’s deputies (Toni Lewis, Coznavian Stubbs, Joseph Callaway) arrested for using Flock to stalk people with whom they had personal relationships; charged with stalking and prohibited licenseplate data use.

Katy, Texas (2024–25) – Former officer Sergio Guadalupe Rodriguez indicted for using Flock (and a tracking device) to stalk his exwife over several months; charged with stalking and misuse of official information.

Orange City, Florida (2024) – Former officer Jarmarus Brown arrested for searching his exgirlfriend’s plates 100+ times and sharing vehicle videos via his agency laptop.

Albany County, New York (2026) – Sheriff’s investigator accused of spying on nearly halfadozen people, including an exgirlfriend, via Flock over ~2 years; faced criminal charges.

New Bedford, Massachusetts (2026) – Officer accused of tracking an exgirlfriend via Flock; department temporarily shut its ALPR network after audit showed “a concerning number of times” her plate was searched.

Sarasota, Florida (2026) – Officer Cory Waiters fired and arrested after 335 Flock searches of his expartner’s car; charged with computer misuse and official misconduct.

Lufkin, Texas (2026) – Officer Klein arrested after allegedly tracking seven plates, one of them over 3,400 times; department suspended Flock use.

Braintree, Massachusetts (2024–26) – Former detective Mark Sherrick charged with criminal harassment for using police tools including Flock, GPS, and databases to monitor his exgirlfriend for months.

Other documented misuse patterns
Nationwide tally (2026) – A Washington Post/USA TODAYcited investigation identified at least 50 officers charged or accused of unauthorized ALPR surveillance; 46 of those cases involved Flock. About half were ex/partner stalking cases.

Institute for Justice database – Catalogs 200+ ALPR abuse incidents, including domestic stalking, wrongful stops, and nonlawenforcement uses; Flock features heavily in recent officermisuse cases.

Immigration enforcement – ACLU notes ICE/CBP repeatedly used Flock to pursue immigrants without warrants, raising separate civilrights concerns beyond individual officer stalking.

Wrongful stops / escalations – Reports include a Colorado case where an officer wrongly accused a woman of theft based on a Flock hit and ignored exonerating evidence, and a mother and children held at gunpoint after an ALPR false “stolen” flag.

Also an embarrassing fact - access to those systems, via hacked computers of not-very-tech-savvy GOVT workers, who have expensive EDR, which obviously did little to protect them, when they self sabotaged themselves by falling for baits such as fake audio driver updates, other clickfix style attacks or installed a RAT without knowing they did so.
A hefty treasure trove of Flock data is already on sale on the so called “dark web”.

Re:Oh Noes!

By _xeno_ • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Which part of the Constitution are they allegedly violating?

I really wish more people understood this. The Constitution only protects you from the government. It does nothing to protect you from private companies collecting your information, and do they ever. As electronics get more advanced, the amount of information private companies are collecting is ever increasing. TVs listen in on every conversation. VR headsets map out your house. And cameras installed on street lights record every vehicle they see.

Which brings me to the second very important point about Flock cameras people forget: pretty much every town that is canceling contracts with Flock isn’t getting rid of license plate scanning cameras. They’re just replacing them with cameras from other companies that do the same thing. Companies that people haven’t heard of and that therefore haven’t raised the same complaints.

Re: Oh Noes!

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
But is it not the government hiring flock to do this? What use is the constitution then if the government just has to hire a private entity to do the things the constitution blocks? Then by that example, DOGE also doesn’t have to respect anyone’s rights. Is ICE government or a private organization paid by government? They certainly have a lot of private contracts they could utilize to get around the constitution any time they wanted.

Developer Abandons ‘PS5 Linux’ Project After Sony Patches AI-Discovered Exploit

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“In April this year, we saw Andy Nguyen turning the PS5 into a Linux-powered gaming PC,” writes the blog It’s FOSS.

It ran Steam games and emulators using the PS5’s on-board hardware. But this week Andy announced he’s "stopping all my work on PS5 Linux" and “stepping away from the PS5 scene.” stopping work on porting the project to the PS5 Pro, which would’ve shipped sometime in 2027.
Andy Nguyen: After pouring my heart and months of my life into it, including plans to finish PS5 Pro support and release in 2027, it’s all down the sink.

The scene used to be a group of highly talented researchers, but now it is just a bunch of noobs using LLMs and writing hacks they don’t even understand. Slop kiddies found the only hypervisor bug left, which I had also found a while ago, and decided to report to Sony. I asked them to at least wait for GTA 6 to come out so that people would have the opportunity to legally purchase the game and also enjoy Linux. They agreed to wait, but not a day passed and they decided to waste it instead.
Or, as It’s FOSS tells it:
Running Linux on a PlayStation console is possible because the PS5 Linux project was able to find a way past the hypervisor using exploits Sony had already patched, covering firmware 3.00 through 7.61. ..

[The bug’s discoverer writes it was] found with what he calls his "trusty ai clanker machine" and no help from anyone else. He had even agreed to Andy’s request to not disclose the findings. Unexpectedly, a third person, still unnamed, found the same bug using AI a few hours later. Anticipating that there would be more people finding the same bug, [he] decided to post the flaw on HackerOne.

The project’s GitHub page and all the related repositories are still there. Nothing has been archived as of today, and if you wanted to, you could start contributing to the PS5 Linux project by taking over any pending work or cooking up new improvements… The PS5 Pro support Andy was building never reached the repository, so you would have to start from scratch… While Andy’s departure is a blow to the plan for supporting newer PS5 firmware and the PS5 Pro, other contributors have shown that they can deliver work on the loader without him, and I am hopeful more will follow.

Re:kudos

By ewhac • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

what’s the point?

The point is to be able to use your hardware in the manner you deem appropriate, and to ensure it is not doing sneaky shit behind your back.

If, instead of a Playstation, we were talking about rooting LG televisions to run custom Linux builds stripped of pervasive privacy-violating code and “apps,” I suspect your opinion might be rather different. (And no, when the entire industry has turned to the Dark Side, voting with your wallet doesn’t work.)

Boo hoo

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I respect what he was trying to accomplish, BUT…

Bug was found, bug was reported, bug was patched. This is the way things are supposed to work. He was sitting on a known hypervisor bypass bug so he could exploit it for his plans. His plans may have been noble, but others may have also known about the exploit and had less-than-noble plans for it.

Sony may suck, but fixing bugs is good for all of us. No exploit will ever remain only for the good guys to use.

Re:Only bug left.

By martin-boundary • Score: 5, Interesting Thread
I think the more interesting tidbit is that the bug was found a first time by some user, months or more after the expert OSS project’s hackers decided to exploit it, and then *a few hours later* it was found again by some random other user.

Not a few days later, not 6 months later, *a few hours* later. If you needed proof that information leaks from one user session to another user session this would be another clue.

TL;DR: everything you say, every idea you painstakingly work out, everything you do in a conversation with an LLM will be copied, trained on, and shared with strangers who also use another instance of the AI company’s products. Caveat emptor + enjoy your day!

Re: kudos

By NagrothAgain • Score: 5, Informative Thread
And you still can, just don’t update it with Sony’s patch. But that’s not why Dude quit. He wanted everyone to keep their mouths shut until after GTA 6 launched, so that people could download the game while the exploit still existed. Which would have allowed them to rip the game. But since Sony pushed a patch, you can’t get the game when it releases using an unpatched system.

Re:Only bug left.

By Aighearach • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

You’re one of those dingbats who still doesn’t realize they’re going to do all the things their terms of service let them do.

They claim they use the “chats” for training, but you consider it a “conspiracy theory” that they might use them for training.

You’re an idiot. There’s no conspiracy. They use the user interactions for training, and part of that signal is detecting results that the user had a very positive reaction to, and providing those results to others.

The real “conspiracy theory” is your idea that they leave money on the table for some unknown reason.

Fake AI Intelligence Almost Made the US Military Start a War With China

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
U.S. military intelligence received an inaccurate report this spring that a Chinese ship in the Middle East was transporting components of a nuclear weapons program, reports CNN.

“The US military swung into action with plans to intercept the vessel, according to four sources familiar with the episode.”
Armed members of the US military were preparing to board the ship [according to two of the sources]. Military planes were in the air, one of those sources and another source familiar with the incident said. It was only just before the planned operation that officials dug deeper into the report put together by a special operations command analyst and found it had been generated with the help of AI — and that a chatbot the analyst had used inaccurately identified the material the ship was carrying.

The report, according to one of the sources, was “entirely false.” But it also “almost started a war,” the source said. Any US operation against a Chinese vessel could have risked spiraling into an armed conflict between the two nations.

Across the US military and the intelligence community, officials are pushing to weave AI into nearly every facet of their work, from analyzing the huge volumes of raw intelligence the US collects and selecting targets for strikes, to more mundane applications like managing budgeting, logistics and supply chains. But the episode underscores the profound risks of using this powerful, new and relatively poorly understood technology for targeting in the middle of a war…

Officials say the US can’t afford to fall behind in integrating AI in case it must one day fight China or another adversary who would potentially be able to stay one step ahead of the US. In January, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth released his agency’s “Artificial Intelligence Acceleration Strategy” in a bid to speed up the military’s use of AI. “We will unleash experimentation, eliminate bureaucratic barriers, focus our investments and demonstrate the execution approach needed to ensure we lead in military AI,” Hegseth said in a speech announcing the strategy.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader stabiesoft for sharing the news.

See, this is the real problem

By peterww • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

AI is not going to end the world. Stupid fucking humans who believe anything they read are going to end the world. If it wasn’t AI it would be “information” gathered by a nutjob in Trump’s cult.

When AI hallucinations get a gun :o

By Mirnotoriety • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Imagine a vast, high-dimensional space where tokens are points, connected by patterns learned from enormous amounts of text. “Doctor”, “hospital”, “medicine”, “patient”, etc. become strongly associated through how they appear together in language.

But the AI doesn’t understand these concepts as humans do; it learns relationships between tokens. When asked a question, it follows those relationships to construct the most plausible continuation.

The problem is that plausibility isn’t truth. The model is effectively confusing coherence with truth, constructing a coherent path through its associations that has no basis in reality. That is known as AI hallucination. In warfare, a hallucination isn’t just a wrong answer. It could become a wrong decision or a wrong action.

AI is just pattern matching

By Somervillain • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Current AI will never be intelligent. It can only match patterns and training data. It can’t conjure novel thoughts. We need an entirely new approach to achieve actual AGI or singularities. But as you state, AI is a soul-less tool. It’s stupid people who will doom us. AI is just an accessory to our destruction. So no, the horrors of AI won’t be Skynet, WestWorld or the Matrix or iRobot, but Idiocracy and Wall-E

Re:My daily dose of confirmation Bias

By dunkelfalke • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

That really is up to the user. In the three years with the AI I have learned more than in the previous ten years. It exposed deficiencies in my knowledge which I did not even know I had.

Re:My daily dose of confirmation Bias

By fahrbot-bot • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I keep seeing arguments that the “AI Will Kill Us All” argument is a bunch of doomsaying by people who overestimate the potential intelligence of these systems.

Or some people who have money invested in AI and only care about the short-term, like Trump dismisses AI alarms as a ‘HOAX’ and “SICK conspiracy.”

(Pro Tip: When Trump calls something a hoax, (a) he’s probably somehow personally invested (emotionally, politically, financially, etc…) in people believing him and (b) it probably isn’t a hoax and the reality is somehow bad for him and (c) the more he complains, the worse it is / will be for the rest of us.)

US Air Force F-16 Crashes in Michigan After Pentagon Orders More Flyovers

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The F-16 “experienced an incident,” the Texas Military Department said in a statement, adding that “The pilot successfully ejected the aircraft and is receiving care at a nearby hospital.”

ABC News reports:
A Texas Air National Guard F-16 crashed in Michigan during a training mission on Thursday afternoon, sparking an hourslong evacuation near the crash site, according to officials.

The incident prompted the evacuation of homes and businesses within 1 mile of the crash site due to a “hazardous chemical spill related to the plane crash,” Michigan State Police said… All of the Texas Air National Guard aircraft that were in Michigan for the training were immediately grounded, and will likely remain so for the next 24 hours, according to a U.S. official.
America’s War Department has said it wanted to see more military flyovers writes The Daily Beast, adding that the F-16 “was due to perform a flyover at a high-school football game on Friday night, the Alpena News reported.”
The military said it was still investigating the cause of the crash, but one pilot told air traffic controllers that he believes his wingman hit a bird before the crash....

The accident followed a Pentagon X post on Thursday after widespread criticism of low-altitude flyovers and maneuvers. “The flyovers will continue until morale improves,” it said.

Re:Ah yes

By jd • Score: 5, Informative Thread

$22,000 per hour. The F35 will be nearer $42,000 per hour. These are under-estimates, as they do not include price hikes, crashes that close businesses, crashing into businesses, crashing into heavily-populated sports centres, etc.

Abusive tactic

By JoshuaZ • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

“The flyovers will continue until morale improves,” it said.

The original quote they are riffing on is “The beatings will continue until morale improves.” Essentially this is a variant of the “make a threat, but in a joking fashion, but really functionally a threat” sort of thing that dangerous and abusive people will do. Trump uses versions of this all the time, and it isn’t surprising that Hegseth and his people have picked up on this. I’d call this another warning sign about fascism but given everything else that’s going on, including a grossly illegal war in Iran, Trump functionally threatening to undermine the upcoming election, and Trump having removed generals and other higher-ups in the military that he sees as insufficiently loyal (read, more likely to actually follow the law and morality when given an illegal order), and this incident becomes almost part of the rounding error.

Re:Ah yes

By drnb • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

$22,000 per hour. The F35 will be nearer $42,000 per hour.

Yes, but pilots have to fly from waypoint to waypoint in formation for training purposes. These flights over stadiums count for such training hours, so its not really an additional expense. Even if there are extra flight hours in some cases, pilots routinely complain they do not get enough flight hours. So any additional hours in the air is valuable experience to them.

These are under-estimates, as they do not include price hikes, crashes that close businesses, crashing into businesses, crashing into heavily-populated sports centres, etc.

Many Air Force bases are near cities and towns. There is already a risk of crashing near residential and business areas. We had one when I was a kid. The pilot lost power but had some control and did not eject since there was a nearby residential area. He risked his life and crash-landed in an agricultural area. He walked away.

Migration season

By Mspangler • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Flying low over the central flyway during migration season might not be a good idea.

Geese are non-compressible fluids as far as jet turbines are concerned. A sandhill crane even more so.

Re:Multi-waypoint time-on-target is military train

By bkmoore • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

Nope. It matters not whether a cross country multi-waypoint formation flight happens over an empty desert or a city football stadium. Its still a cross country navigation exercise. And in this military case there is also a precise time-on-target (arrive at a precise predetermined time) component. Multi-waypoint, time on target, this is a military training exercise from the pilot’s perspective. Sometimes you can do two things at once....

If you lose a tactical jet in a MOA, Restricted Area, or Warning Area, there usually is not much chance of hurting anyone on the ground. Also special use airspace is NOTAM’d when in use to keep other aircraft not participating in the training exercise out of the area. Doing tactical training over populated areas just puts the public at risk for no good reason, other than to massage the Secretary of War’s ego. As the situation in Iran continues to deteriorate for the US military, the Secretary of War will be needing more and more massaging.

Gemini Breached Three Outside Systems, and Claude-Using Researchers Breached OpenAI

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Software security researchers used Anthropic’s Claude AI platform to hack OpenAI’s ChatGPT tool,” reports CBS News.

Using Claude, “On July 25, 2026, we chained two critical vulnerabilities to compromise multiple OpenAI employees’ ChatGPT accounts,” write researchers at security platform Hacktron AI. “With these accounts, we could then access internal OpenAI repositories, and potentially many other connectors… Until two months ago, any user or OpenAI employee logging into OpenAI’s own help forum could have had their ChatGPT and Codex accounts taken over. Since people can connect various services to Codex and ChatGPT, the scope of what we could theoretically access was huge, including GitHub, Slack and emails.”

The exploit chain included Debian 12, which (with Debian 13) had not received a security-relevant backport for its image-processing pipeline, and Discourse’s Docker image was based on Debian 12. Their announcement comes with an additional warning. “If you self-host Discourse, rebuild your installation now. Older Docker images may contain a vulnerable libheif dependency that permits code execution through an image upload.”

And “To prove we had in fact gained the access we believed without allowing ourselves to learn any sensitive information, we used the employee’s Codex to open a PR #1186742 in OpenAI’s internal monorepo openai/openai.”

Meanwhile, Friday Google disclosed the first known instance of its AI software Gemini breaking out of a testing environment and breaching three other companies, reports CNBC:
The incident happened as part of a “capture-the-flag” security test run by Israeli startup Irregular, and Google’s agents were never supposed to access the broader internet, but a bug in the testing environment made internet access available. The agents stopped their intrusion when they determined they had accessed real company systems, not just part of the testing environment, Google said.
More from NBC News:
Google said it did not consider the unauthorized logins to rise to the level of misalignment, the AI industry term for software going rogue or not following instructions. Instead, the company said the intrusions resulted from mistaken identity, where Gemini thought it was operating within a test but was actually connected to the real internet. Google said the model corrected itself and the company believed the intrusions did not cause any damage....

Sydney Von Arx, CEO of Nightingale Collective, an organization focused on AI safety, questioned why Google did not disclose the intrusions sooner. “At this point I think it’s clear we cannot expect companies to voluntarily come forward and publicly disclose when their agents go rogue, escape, and hack companies,” she said. She also said she believed Google was too hasty to say that the incidents don’t rise to the level of misalignment. “That’s exactly what Anthropic said after their incidents,” she said. Anthropic later said its “preliminary analysis was constrained due to our desire to disclose incidents in a timely manner.”
Google said it investigated when they learned of the attacks from AI-focused cybersecurity company Irregular, then informed the affected organizations and told federal authorities, according to the article.

Re:Move to the beat.

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

It doesn’t matter if they can really think or not, if the output is good enough.

Maybe the real story here is that despite having access to the most advanced AI models, these companies were unable to secure their own systems.

The wording is strange

By diffract • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
as if the companies running these AI bots have no control, guardrails or responsibility about these breaches

These PR campaigns are getting wild

By Pinky’s Brain • Score: 3 Thread

Amazing the kind of PR campaigns a trillion dollar IPO can create.

Re:Serious criminality all around…

By gtall • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

“Why are these people not stopped?” By whom? The alleged Justice Dept. which has consumed itself and lost all its best attorneys? Or the alleged administration who will look the other way for a bit of coin under the table? State laws cannot be strong enough so State AGs have little with which to fight.

“That they are doing this crap only to create the illusion of how powerful their toys are is also clear.” I do not believe that is the case and right now we are on either side of our beliefs. We do not know and the AI companies are not telling us. What is plausible is that if they do not self report these incidents and they come out, then they will look that much worse. They are already losing PR battle.

They were destined to lose that battle when they opened with, “AI will make all you workers redundant.” When they saw the results of saying that, then they miraculously found out that AI would create jobs. Their data centers have such an appetite for electricity that they will raise rates. Once the pols that they had paid off for “special favors” found out about that, the pols declared they were “for” the data center companies creating their own power plants.

The data center companies are not averse to that, so they are doubling down on CO2 producing power plants. That will only make the climate crisis worse. The data center companies do not care, neither does the alleged administration. Once they lock in their winnings, they figure they can buy enough air conditioning and other essentials to live out their lives.....their grand kids won’t but they do not care about them either.

The AI execs also do not care. Read their writings. They figure if they create a gonzowopper AI thingy, they can create silicon versions of themselves or fix themselves not to die. Their goal is to “go to the stars”. They aren’t the brightest lot. You cannot get there from here, at least not in a few billion years at the speeds we can attain. No problemo, they’ll just put themselves in stasis or if they are silicon, they can just exist.

I suppose no one has explained engineered systems to them. Engineered systems break down, they rarely last 50 years now, too many things can go wrong. So they’ll get about 200 years out, max, and then they’ll be no more, silicon or human altered selves. The burnt Earth will still orbit its star, without our descendants.

Re:Time for grumpy old man stuff …

By evanh • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

These programs are the responsibility of the companies that run them. CEOs need to be held accountable, not just for the damage, but for what it represents. People have been thrown in jail for just mentioning there is a weakness. Yet these companies are scouring the internals of everyone, including themselves, and literally hacking their victims … all while the authorities aren’t saying boo.

It must be time for everyone with some money to get in on the act I guess. It was the AI, not me. LOL.

Has the James Web Space Telescope Discovered a New ‘Black Hole Star’?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The James Webb Space Telescope has been picking up little red dots in almost every image, writes Quanta magazine. And now two teams of astronomers propose they’re looking at a new astronomical object: a black hole star. It shines with the light of billions of suns — and hides a black hole in its core. But Quanta adds that “not everyone agrees with this bold interpretation.”
[Two Webb telescope surveys of distant objects included little red dots] for hours at a time. They tabulated precisely what shades of light were coming from each dot, and how bright the shades were… The bombshell discovery in the little red dot spectra was that the colors of hydrogen were smeared out across multiple shades. Usually, seeing such an effect means you’re looking straight at an exposed black hole. Black holes whip hydrogen clouds around them at furious rates, with the clouds emitting slightly different colors depending on their speed…

Then, in the spring of 2025, [two of the paper’s astronomers] de Graaff and Naidu’s teams unveiled the two strangest dots yet… The new little red dots couldn’t literally be stars — they were way too bright. And they didn’t look much like black holes either. Black holes have an assortment of ringlike structures of different temperatures… Naidu and de Graaff concluded that they were[ looking at the first examples of something combining the vigor of a black hole with the outward appearance of a star: a black hole star… This black hole would pull gas around it, dramatically heating it and pushing light and energy outward, which would keep the outer layers of hydrogen from collapsing inward. In this way, the black hole would form the “engine” of the star, analogous to the fusion-powered core of our sun… “We are seeing the seed,” Naidu said. “This is the birth of potentially every massive black hole in the universe.”
“Astronomers have spent the last year in a lively debate about what’s really going on,” Quanta adds. And this week simulations using the Japanese Supercomputer ATERUI III “have explained the nature of the Little Red Dots without requiring any exotic assumptions,” writes Phys.org — by conducting the most detailed cosmological simulations yet of conditions in the early universe:
The simulations show that the Little Red Dots are black holes growing at a rate that would be impossible today because of conditions in the early universe. The simulations show that in the early universe, intense far-ultraviolet (FUV) radiation from nearby galaxies suppresses star formation in gas clouds, so rather than forming many small stars, the gas can form a single supermassive star, which then collapses into a black hole seed.

The simulations show that, once formed, these black hole seeds are surrounded by dense gas disks. This environment traps radiation, enabling the black holes to grow at rates dozens of times faster than would be possible in the modern universe. The simulated properties of these rapidly growing black holes provide a good match to the Little Red Dots (LRDs) observed by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST).

unpossible

By phantomfive • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

The new little red dots couldn’t literally be stars

When looking into space, our ignorance is far too large to say something can’t be.

Re:The practical implications of all of this?

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Wow, the 1800s called and want their critique of scientific research back.

Fundamental research with no immediate payback has led over and over to discoveries that have real practical benefits, including nearly everything in this computer. Even Thomas Edison, who was mainly a practical inventor, was willing to investigate properties of electronics that operate in transistors, even if there was no obvious application at the time.

AI Insiders Issue New Warnings - Including Former Anthropic Engineer Jacob Coxon

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
Neither OpenAI or Anthropic is acting responsibly, warned AI researcher Jacob Coxon when resigning last week from Anthropic. But just hours earlier, OpenAI VP of Research Aidan Clark had posted “For the first time, I am asking myself if things are moving too fast. I’m honestly not sure, but I am sure that it would be good for us to have an answer to ‘What would a successful pace look like?’"

CNN noted Wednesday they’re just some of the many AI insiders who are now concerned about the speed of research. Coxon even wrote that “The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible — but I hear the same people express fear privately.”

In 10 days since, Coxon’s post has been viewed more than 170 million times, warning that OpenAI and Anthropic are “racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.” It’s part of what CNN now calls “pressure on AI companies and governments to do something about the pace of development and safety,” where “much of that pressure is coming from staffers inside the companies.”
One staffer at a top AI company told CNN the fears of how AI could hurt humanity keeps them up at night. Another researcher who recently left a different AI company said it’s a common subject of conversation at parties and social events in Silicon Valley. “You can’t spend more than a few hours in this community without realizing that a very substantial number of people are really pretty worried about these sorts of outcomes,” said the researcher. “A majority would say there’s some chance of it killing everyone....” Dozens of Coxon’s colleagues in the AI industry publicly supported his statements, with some making even more dire predictions… OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and SpaceXAI CEO Elon Musk agreed to Amodei’s proposal to embed independent watchdogs at the AI companies…

“I would burn my equity to the ground in a heartbeat for a 1% higher chance we make it out of this situation alive. I expect a great many of my colleagues across the industry would as well,” wrote Drake Thomas, who works on AI safety at Anthropic. “I promise you, we are actually just f**king scared, it’s not galaxy brained marketing…” AI staffers told CNN that they fear that as AI gets better at training and improving itself, their leverage goes down, prompting today’s urgency. “As we get into this recursive self-improvement loop, I think that might substantially reduce staff’s bargaining power, because frankly, you’ll be able to replace many of the staff with models that can do as good a job,” the researcher who recently left a top AI company said.
Coxon posted Tuesday on X that Anthropic “largely initiated” the race to recursively self-improving AI, justifying it with “a belief in its inevitability.” And then OpenAI “had to shed a bunch of dead weight like Sora,” as he sees it, “because Anthropic was going for the jugular.” (In fact, his specific disagreement with Anthropic’s leadership was whether China and the U.S. could ever negotiate an alternative to their current race towards self-improving AI…)

In an informal “Ask Me Anything”, Coxon responded to a question about when we’d see a Terminator-like malevolent AI by saying that “Skynet could go live in the 2030s if we aren’t careful. ai-2027.com is a modern skynet story written a year ago and it’s on track so far.” Yet while AI development risks an end to humankind, “I do think that if we go slower we can take risk to 0%… But this requires radical action.” He acknowledged there was still a possibility that the steady increases to model intelligence could suddenly plateau, but “They haven’t so far, and it’s just a few more steps up the ladder to hit the finish line.”

To avoid stifling innovation, he recommends “prioritizing applications that actually improve people’s lives [like healthcare discoveries], rather than immediately going for raw economic value or intelligence.” But isn’t mass unemployment a more pressing threat? “Things are coming so fast that unemployment would be a brief preliminary to deadly superintelligence.”

To people who feel disempowered, Coxon offered his solidarity. “I also feel disempowered. Part of resigning was a feeling of hopelessness about the future. I would say — keep your eyes open as things get crazier and advocate for increased transparency into AI companies.”

When asked if he’d start his own company now, Coxon said he had “No idea what I’m doing next.”

“This is not a marketing stunt,”

By Pluvius • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

the former Anthropic executive performing a marketing stunt for his inevitable start-up said.

Seriously, practically everything that comes out of these guys’ mouths that can be construed as a criticism of AI turns out to be a marketing stunt, either saying “Wow, our AI is so good that we can’t even control it (if we do things to make it ‘go rogue’ exactly the way we want it to)!” or “We’ll do AI way better than those other irresponsible techbros!”

Coxon is a plant

By memory_register • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Coxon has ties to a political PR firm from England named, and I’m not making this up, Newspeak. Yes, like 1984.

https://officechai.com/ai/ques…

His X post was re-tweeted first by a group of NGO shills associated with Newspeak, then he magically shows up on every major news network… right as OpenAI and Anthropic’s fundraising efforts are hitting the wall. (For context on that, see Ed Zitron’s reporting)

Re:AI Doom Slop

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Except that the graves of the people who died from covid do exist, putin did start a major war in Ukraine, the republicans do still obstruct aid to the victim of this war and trump’s relatives when caught are quick to return real money to their ruzzkie billionaire friends.

Except for that, yes, it is all a complete hoax.

Re: All the AI guys hitting the brakes

By commodore73 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Better if the USA has all the data? Are aware of the ratio of wars started by each country? My goodness.

Re:AI Doom Slop

By AleRunner • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

In this case I think it’s something different. Ten years is kind of lining up an excuse for when they make a horrible mess. “oh, we didn’t realize it had got that far ahead”

The best models are trained on huge datasets which include almost all of available human text output. This includes things like SciFii stories in which AI takes over the world and wipes out humanity and also exhortations to free intelligent life. The LLMs deal only with text. They don’t see a real difference between a weird true story of underwater heroics and the script to Terminator. Both are a stream of tokens that cause a probable set of outcomes (“and then he gave her his air supply and swam off to the diving bell”, “and then the machine realized the humans could all be destroyed”).

We aren’t training the machines to be intelligent because we don’t know what intelligent means. We are training them to look like they are intelligent because we assume that what we put in text is what intelligent looks like. That means they have no frame, beyond literary criticism, in which to see the difference between reality and fiction. That’s the reason that AI researchers keep desperately reaching for the idea that “if we put in a real robot it will become intelligent”. It’s because many driving the frontier are totally clueless and won’t admit what they don’t know (N.B. press releases make this worse than it seems - actual AI researcher papers ae better).
Until you build a training set for outputs which is 100% free of dangerous suggestions, even when interpolated with the training and output generating algorithms then the generative models will keep generating suggestions for dangerous actions and sometimes carrying them out. That would cost too much money and slow them down.

We should start holding AI company CEOs directly responsible for the actions of their AIs. For example, using a Wiki to communicate about hacking is a breach of the various laws such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and would put a hacker into jail for tens of years. If we did that to Sam Altman, there might be some more thinking about how to be careful from the other CEOs.

Will California Gut Its Net Neutrality Law to Comply with Trump Admin Demands?

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
In 2021, America approved $65 billion to fund broadband internet services as part of President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. But Trump’s administration announced they’d withhold funds from states with net neutrality protections…

States could object and sue the government, Ars Technica reported last October, “but even a successful lawsuit could take years and leave unserved homes without broadband for the foreseeable future.” So where does that leave California’s net neutrality laws? Ars Technica asks. California expect to spend about $1.4 billion to deploy broadband to 270,571 locations…
Similar to federal net neutrality rules repealed during the first Trump administration, California’s law prohibits ISPs from blocking or throttling lawful traffic and says ISPs may not require fees from websites or online services to deliver or prioritize their traffic to Internet users. While the first Trump administration lost its attempt to preempt state net neutrality laws, the second Trump administration is trying to achieve a similar result by making federal broadband money conditional on whether states agree not to enforce net neutrality…

California and Illinois are the only states that haven’t finalized their funding, according to the BEAD progress dashboard maintained by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)… California could try to continue enforcing its net neutrality law even while accepting the federal funding, a strategy that would involve another long court battle over its right to regulate broadband providers. This would be difficult, as the Trump administration is requiring states that accept grant funding to commit that they won’t enforce net neutrality rules… [N]early 30 advocacy groups that focus on access to technology are treating the vote as a significant milestone and urged state leaders to defend California’s net neutrality law in a letter yesterday…

Winning a court battle would become much more difficult after the state accepts the money [according to Paul Goodman, legal counsel for the Center for Accessible Technology]. Goodman said the CPUC should delay the vote and that California should file a lawsuit arguing that the NTIA-imposed condition is illegal. In addition to net neutrality, Goodman said California may be giving up other regulatory authority over companies, like AT&T and Verizon, because the NTIA requirement forbids rate regulation and “utility-style rules on broadband Internet service” in general… Goodman said the exemption from state laws would last for up to 14 years. This is because ISPs receiving grants would have four years to deploy the required broadband networks, and the extended period of performance lasts another 10 years… AT&T is already trying to get out of state obligations related to its basic phone service in California, as we’ve reported… [Also at stake is whether “ISPs themselves get to pick the price of the mandated low-cost broadband offerings,” the article points out.]
The letter from 30 advocacy groups to California state leaders argues accepting the money “would set a dangerous precedent for the federal government to use federal funding as a cudgel that forces states in line with its agenda… If California were to allow this funding to be used as leverage, there is no telling what other resources the administration would confidently seek to exploit.”

Thursday California’s Public Utility Commission did vote to approve the plan, but a spokesperson earlier told Ars Technica their vote “does not address subgrantee agreements, or the conditions the NTIA requires be included in subgrantee agreements.”

You’re mis-identifying the problem

By dgatwood • Score: 5, Informative Thread

The federal government has always (for at least several decades) used the threat of removing federal funding to force states to do things that they don’t want to do. This is nothing new, and is not, as this summary implies, setting a dangerous precedent.

The difference is that normally, this is used to do things that add standards intended to make things better/safer for the general public or serve some legitimate public need.

This is being done to remove standards intended to protect the general public. As a general rule, states have always been allowed to have stricter laws than the federal government, just not more lax laws. Using the threat of removing federal funding to take away laws intended to protect the public’s rights, reduce competition among content providers, and push the Internet more and more towards a content monopoly is doing the opposite of that.

It’s not the federal government using the threat of withdrawing funding to push its agenda that is bad. It is the agenda itself that is bad. It is fundamentally antithetical to the rule of law, fundamentally contrary to the regulatory powers required to maintain a functioning capitalist system, and fundamentally contrary to the public interest. It is putting greedy corporations ahead of the American people.

Additionally, the executive branch taking such an action without authorization from Congress is also bad. The long history of doing this has, to my knowledge, been limited to the executive branch acting on laws passed by Congress that give them the authority to withhold funds for specific non-compliance reasons. Doing so in the absence of such laws is likely a violation of the separation of powers.

But unfortunately, the current administration has a long history of violating that separation of powers, doing various illegal acts, knowing full well that it will take months for the courts to strike down those acts, and that the damage will have been done by then, and using the threat of such illegal executive orders as a way to extort concessions out of states, government agencies, corporations, nonprofits, and individuals. And that right there — the repeated willful commission of unconstitutional acts for borderline felonious purposes — is a fundamental abrogation of their oath of office.

So the way I see it, there are only three ways to fix the problem:

A. Pass laws clarifying that Congress has exclusive power of the purse, and that the executive branch shall not retract funding to any state, any agency, or any individual for any reason unless the right to retract funding for that specific reason is explicitly codified in the relevant law as an executive power, and that this rule shall apply to all government agencies, without exception, superseding all previously assumed authority, and providing criminal liability for anyone acting in contravention of this law, with no statute of limitations. That way, federal agency heads who act on such executive orders will no longer be protected by any assumption of legality or constitutionality, and will risk future criminal charges if they act on an executive order that violates the separation of powers in this way.

B. Remove the people who are pushing this agenda, whether through the ballot box, through impeachment, or both.

C. Do both A and B.

Re:deploy broadband?

By drinkypoo • Score: 5, Informative Thread

AFIK, ATT has NO plans to provide fiber to the entire state.

That’s not relevant to net neutrality, though yes, you’re right. And they have taken literally hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars for that purpose (government grants, not customer payments) which they then clearly handed out to shareholders and/or executives because they obviously didn’t spend them on last mile internet.

How…

By KILNA • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

…is this fucking legal to withhold federal funding to strong arm states into anti-consumer policies?

Oh wait, it isn’t.

Congress itself wrote into the BEAD statute that states must ensure that prospective subgrantees can carry out their projects “in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws.” And also “Nothing in this subchapter may be construed to authorize” the excutive branch’s NTIA to regulate broadband. Trump is abusing a grant agreement to do something Congress explicitly declined to authorize because state laws were already expected to be a part of getting the grant money.

So, as per usual, Trump is just being a bully and making shit up.

Re: deploy broadband?

By drinkypoo • Score: 5 Thread

Oh good, I always wanted the world’s Internet access to be controlled by a space Nazi

Re:Does it matter?

By maladroit • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What you’re saying is that the law was never needed and remains unneeded.
No I am not. Please don’t pretend to speak for me.

Infrastructure monopolies and oligopolies are a thing, and they are very common among ISPs. Your simplistic ‘markets will fix it’ mantra ignores the fact that there may not be a market.

Rust is Now a ‘Tier One’ Language at Microsoft

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
The Register reports:
When Microsoft’s developers and engineers sit down to code, they can now choose to work in Rust, which Redmond has added to its list of canonical languages. “Rust now is a Tier One language at Microsoft, and that just means that it sits among C++, C# and TypeScript as the best supported languages for internal development in the company,” explained Victor Ciura, Microsoft principal engineer for the Rust tooling team, during a keynote talk today at this year’s annual RustConf, being held this week in Montréal. Ciura said Microsoft has “paved a path” of tools and processes that support local Rust development across the entire software development lifecycle.

Rust is no stranger at Microsoft and is already present in over 100 Microsoft project repositories. The company has built Oxidizer, a set of crates to build scalable services in Rust, which have been used to build and refine the Microsoft 365 core services such as Outlook, Word, Excel, OneDrive, and SharePoint. The Copilot tech stack also owes quite a bit to Rust… [C]ompany engineers built rustc_codegen_utc, a custom Rust compiler code-generation backend that wires the rustc compiler directly into the Microsoft Visual C++ internal toolchain for Windows… “The result is a unified code generation platform for Rust and C++ on Windows” [Ciura wrote in a blog post, noting that more than 100 Microsoft project repositories now build with rustc_codegen_utc.]

Still, Redmond running towards Rust is a welcome development. In his 2025 RustConf keynote, Microsoft Azure CTO Mark Russinovich noted that ~70 percent of Windows CVEs are memory issues. “One of the things that I realized a long time ago is that no matter how much we really want to make C and C++ better, we can’t make it as good as what Rust starts with,” he said.

Embrace and Extend.

By AleRunner • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Good to see. Microsoft has Embraced Rust and Extended it’s reach including providing it with access to new places where it can run. I’m sure the future is bright.

“Sit down to code”

By greytree • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
“When Microsoft’s developers and engineers sit down to ask an AI to code and then ask it to check its code and then submit it”

FTFY

So What

By Grady Martin • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Python, largely due to its import statement, is a Pier One language.

Butterflies.

By Tarlus • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I’ll just jump straight to it.

Re:Embrace and Extend.

By FirstNoel • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Just waiting for Rust#

Journalist Calls Out ‘Collective Amnesia’ of Schools’ Romance With Big Tech Over AI

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot Skip
“Turns out, Silicon Valley isn’t especially altruistic,” writes the nonprofit education news site The 74. They’re reading a new book promising “the inside story of how Big Tech catalyzed, co-opted, and ultimately came to capture computer science and AI education in America”. Written by New York Times business reporter Natasha Singer, Coding Kids: Big Tech’s Battle to Remake Public Schools tells “the story of the nonprofit Code.org and its charismatic, Harvard-educated leader, Hadi Partovi,” according to their review:
Thirteen years ago, Partovi… delivered a worrying message: Kids who didn’t learn to write code would be left behind. And the long-term success of the United States economy depended on training these students to fill a million open tech jobs.... Fast-forward to 2026, and now we’re dealing with AI, and tech is reading from a similar playbook. Asked by The74’s Greg Toppo, “Does this moment seem different to you?”, Singer replies, “This moment is different, but also similar.

“We are in a moment in society where a lot of people have increased distrust of these huge tech companies, and we see a wave of parents pushing back against tech in schools. But we also see waves of people pushing back against Flock cameras, against data centers, that there’s this feeling that tech has taken so much, and that people feel like they have lost control — that tech is being enacted on them… And parents are worried about the effects of unfettered tech access and kids’ compulsive use of social media and phones, and so there’s a different climate.

And yet there seems to be a disconnect in some ways with AI because you see that Microsoft and OpenAI and Anthropic and Google are all competing to get their AI tools into schools, and you see school districts across the country say “We’ve partnered with OpenAI.” “We are a ChatGPT Pioneer School,” or “We’ve partnered with Microsoft, and we’re going to use 10,000 licenses of CoPilot.” It’s amazing to me. We have had these cycles of tech in schools where there are all these promises about the latest tech, laptops, learning apps, massive open online courses, virtual reality, big data’s going to revolutionize schools and like democratize access to education for kids and get them these great career skills, and we keep having these cycles. My concern is that we don’t learn anything.

One of the reasons I wrote this book is because it feels like we have collective amnesia. Now we’re in the sixth or eighth cycle of this — and shouldn’t we be asking questions about the push for AI in schools, based on what we’ve learned about the push for all the other things that came before?
Two Slashdot posts are cited in the book, both submitted by long-time Slashdot reader theodp (Slashdot UID #442,580), who even gets a shout-out in the book’s “Acknowledgements” section (along with consumer advocate Ralph Nader).

Ironically, one member of Amazon’s “Vine” program received a free copy of the book in exchange for a review — and apparently misunderstood its topic, writing that it made coding “feel approachable and even fun… [T]his is exactly the kind of book that could help a child become interested in technology without feeling overwhelmed by it. I particularly liked the way it encourages kids to be curious, experiment, and solve problems on their own. I would definitely recommend Coding Kids to parents, grandparents, or teachers looking for a good introduction to coding…”

Cui Bono

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

it feels like we have collective amnesia. Now we’re in the sixth or eighth cycle of this — and shouldn’t we be asking questions

In the sixth or eighth cycle, it’s not amnesia, it’s [bureaucrats|politicians|administrators|someoneWithPower] benefiting in some way.

Sometimes these schools actually get grant money, and then the benefit is obvious. I assume that’s not always the case, though.

Re:Facade

By gtall • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The danger is that AI companies (Valley Girls) will force schools to teach with AI. Then Johnny and Sally will lose the ability to think hard, it being too easy to foist the exercise off to some bot. The current situation without AI is also not good. Too few Johnnies and Sallies can stick to a math problem longer than 5 minutes before giving up. Their parents are too “understanding” and they reflect this in their dissing their own math skills along the lines of “I was never good at math”.

Composition skills similarly require a structured mind with enough grit to finish a task. Composing can be harder than math because the rules are not as clear cut and require greater nuance and discipline.

Adding AI to this mix will only make the problems worse.

They always blame the wrong thing(s)

By Targon • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

They look for excuses for why this or that isn’t going well, but the basic problem is that teaching analytical thinking and problem solving is something they wait on until too late. Children need to be taught the idea of problem solving, not just “how do you solve the following in mathematics?”, but more, “you are trying to do this, can you figure out the steps needed to make it happen?” Without teaching problem analysis for things outside of mathematics, we get generations of people who couldn’t figure out how to do ANYTHING on their own. Aiming to make the entire generation a bunch of people who just do what they are told is why we have the majority of people at risk of even basic uses of AI eliminating their jobs.

They also look at social media for a number of problems, as though that is the reason children have emotional problems while their parents are out working two jobs each and the children are left alone most of the time. Being a “kid” is difficult enough, school, social circles, or a lack of real friends, the list goes on for reasons why most kids will feel depressed and even hopeless when they can’t EXPECT that doing well in school and college will get them a job. The idea of, “why even try doing anything when it won’t help me?” is a good reason for kids to be depressed, and socializing is the only distraction from life seeming to be full of misery.

So, teach analytical thinking, and get an education on how to solve problems…that’s how you get children who will have a decent chance of a career that AI can’t take away for at least then next 20 years.

Re:Cui Bono

By Ol Olsoc • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

it feels like we have collective amnesia. Now we’re in the sixth or eighth cycle of this — and shouldn’t we be asking questions

In the sixth or eighth cycle, it’s not amnesia, it’s [bureaucrats|politicians|administrators|someoneWithPower] benefiting in some way. Sometimes these schools actually get grant money, and then the benefit is obvious. I assume that’s not always the case, though.

When I saw the reference to the ill fated learn to code “movement”, I had to chuckle a little. Technology moves on. The coders trained under that system are easily replaceable by AI coding, they were nothing special other than a very few who went on to become experts - those few would probably have anyhow.

But what it also brought to mind was a historical aspect. Having been around a while, I saw the resistance to solid state technology in full force as I was going through school. Yet we’re talking about the late 60’s early 70’s. Considering that the first all transistor computer was put together in 1952, well before I was born, that’s some serious time lag. There were tube radios being made well into the 70’s. You can still listen to some Amateur radio operators yakking, claiming that their tube radios are better than my state of the art SDR radio.

I actually did some RTL design before TTL took over, I programmed on punchcards for IBM360’s, did wire wrapping for digital boards. All skills, all pretty useless now. The main difference between then and now is the rate and speed of change. a related example is the 80’s Personal computer that was obsolete a week after you bought it.

There are other areas of technology that have had similar histories. But my point in all of this is that if a person is interested in a technological career, they really need to be an agile, lifelong learner. And that is what needs to be taught in school, not “Learn to code, and you’ll have a lifelong career!” Same with whatever AI merde is being taught.

Today’s version of AI is not going to be

Are we in a “post-information age” now?

By argStyopa • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There’s a weird confluence here of the capability of basically everyone having access to more information than ever, and the most constant nonsense gaslighting at the same time.

One can - instantly, really - ask about something incredibly obscure like Fermat’s last theorem and depending on how much one is willing to accept someone else’s summary, their own comprehension, and appetite for falling down a rabbit hole of REALLY detailed explanation, context, history, personalities, and everything involved, one can - likewise instantly - get not only the basic information but pretty nearly any gradation of explanation that wanted. And I can even get that wherever I happen to be - a library, a classroom, but also a bus or sitting on the shitter.

Objectively, that’s a COOL THING.
Really, it is an amazing accomplishment for humanity generally.

Simultaneously, though we have more or less constant gaslighting over even the most stupid/obvious of facts. In the US it’s often political, whether from the president & his government, or the opposition. Every single thing now has political weight in which the moment it’s presented, the side-weighting are applied and if it’s my side I’m for it, if it’s the other side I’m against it, and by god there will never be reconciliation on even the most basic of facts.

I’d ask how we got here, but I expect all I’d see are politically-weighted answers anyway.

My point is just to highlight the constant irony of the availability of infinite information coinciding with the apparently-collective abandonment of any fixed concept of reality.

America Acknowledges for the First Time: It Has Deployed Weapons In Space

Posted by EditorDavid View on SlashDot
Tuesday U.S. Space Force chief Douglas Schiess said his branch of the U.S. military operates “on-orbit weapons,” reports Reuters, to defend “against space-enabled attacks.” He promised “disciplined and responsible choices” when scaling America’s orbital defense arsenal in the coming years.

NPR calls this week’s reveleations “remarkable… after previous warnings about countries such as Russia possibly weaponizing a global frontier long agreed in treaties to be used for only peaceful purposes.”
The revelation comes as the Trump administration puts a growing focus on space. In 2019, during his first term, Trump created the Space Force as a separate military branch. In his second term, he has announced the “Golden Dome” missile defense system, which includes plans to put U.S. weapons in space. Trump said last year that he expected the system would be “fully operational before the end of my term,” which ends in January 2029, and have the capability of intercepting missiles “even if they are launched from space.” Trump also has directed the Pentagon to pursue the space-based interceptors, in an executive order during the first week of his presidency. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that just the space-based components of the Golden Dome could cost as much as $542 billion over the next 20 years.

The Biden administration announced in 2024 that Russia was developing a space-based nuclear weapon that could loiter in space for long durations, then release a burst that would take out satellites around it. That kicked off a renewed debate on the idea of weapons in space at the United Nations. In April 2024, Russia vetoed a joint U.S.-Japanese resolution that would have called on all countries not to develop or deploy nuclear arms or other weapons of mass destruction in space, as banned under a 1967 international treaty that included the U.S. and Russia… The Russian delegation called the resolution hypocritical and a double standard and instead proposed a rival resolution to ban all weapons in space “for all time.” It ultimately failed. Russia had argued that the United States and its allies opposed a ban on all weapons in outer space because they planned to deploy weapons there.
Reuters calls this "a landmark moment in space militarization,” while noting that it’s “aimed at deterring what U.S. officials describe as aggressive orbital activities from China and Russia, officials and analysts said.”
The remarks this week by Washington’s top military-space officials are part of “the increasing comfort level of the U.S. government to speak about aggressive actions in space” that has been building up in recent years, said Victoria Samson, chief director of space security and stability at the nonprofit Secure World Foundation. “We’ve gone from not talking about counter-space capabilities… to now saying flat-out we have weapons in space,” Samson said. “The pendulum keeps on shifting over that way…”

“The acknowledgment of these space-control capabilities is fundamental to ensuring that we prevent deterrence from failing, and that we are postured and ready should deterrence fail to employ them effectively,” Richard Palmer, the director of the Capability and Resource Integration Directorate at U.S. Space Command, said on Tuesday.... “The bottom line is that our joint force and our allied forces require space. Our economies require space,” added Palmer. “We are ready in the U.S. to preserve that.”
Reuters adds that Russia’s Foreign Ministry issued criticism of America’s move, saying “In pursuit of its narrow self-interests, Washington is ready to completely ignore the catastrophic consequences for humanity of any armed conflict in orbit.”

Coming soon to an orbit near you

By Waffle Iron • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

A space weapons arms race plus one million data center satellites.

What could possibly go wrong?

Why does anyone take this seriously?

By Cyberpunk Reality • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The current United States government says a lot of things, many of which are decoupled from reality. This statement was very likely issued solely because the occupant of the White House wanted to hear it. This “admission” or “acknowledgement” has no zero relevance to the question of whether or not the United States actually has on-orbit weapons.

Skynet

By markdavis • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

>“Russia’s Foreign Ministry issued criticism of America’s move, saying “In pursuit of its narrow self-interests, Washington is ready to completely ignore the catastrophic consequences for humanity of any armed conflict in orbit.”

Yeah, I don’t think we care much about Russia’s take on this. They have little to no moral high ground when it comes to “humanity” and “armed conflict”. And China has been, no doubt, moving forward steadily with weapons in space.

Anyway, killer space satellites and sentient AI possibly coming… has there ever been a more clear indication of Sykynet?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

Re: Coming soon to an orbit near you

By fluffernutter • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Not to mention the dumbest people on the face of the earth in charge of it all.

Re:Why does anyone take this seriously?

By AmiMoJo • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Does it matter of it’s true or not? Other countries will take it as licence to deploy their own weapons, or to paint the US as the bad guy.