Alterslash

the unofficial Slashdot digest
 

Contents

  1. Oura Buys Gesture-Navigation Startup DoublePoint
  2. Apple Blocks US Users From Downloading ByteDance’s Chinese Apps
  3. System76 Comments On Recent Age Verification Laws
  4. Mozilla Is Working On a Big Firefox Redesign
  5. Iran War Provides a Large-Scale Test For AI-Assisted Warfare
  6. Python ‘Chardet’ Package Replaced With LLM-Generated Clone, Re-Licensed
  7. Proton Mail Helped FBI Unmask Anonymous ‘Stop Cop City’ Protester
  8. AI Startup Sues Ex-CEO Saying He Took 41GB of Email, Lied On Resume
  9. The National Videogame Museum Acquires the Mythical Nintendo Playstation
  10. Florida Woman Gets Prison Time For Illegally Selling Microsoft Product Keys
  11. AI Translations Are Adding ‘Hallucinations’ To Wikipedia Articles
  12. IBM Scientists Unveil First-Ever ‘Half-Mobius’ Molecule
  13. Congress Extends ISS, Tells NASA To Get Moving On Private Space Stations
  14. Microsoft Confirms ‘Project Helix,’ a Next-Gen Xbox That Can Run PC Games
  15. Pentagon Formally Designates Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk

Alterslash picks up to the best 5 comments from each of the day’s Slashdot stories, and presents them on a single page for easy reading.

Oura Buys Gesture-Navigation Startup DoublePoint

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Smart ring maker Oura has acquired Doublepoint, a Finnish startup specializing in gesture recognition technology for wearables. Engadget reports:
The Finnish startup uses smartwatches and wristbands as examples of products that benefit from its technology, but Oura will clearly be looking to incorporate it into its rings, in theory allowing you to control your connected devices with hand movements.

Oura said in a press release that the deal sees it inherit an “exceptional team of AI architects and builders from Doublepoint,” including Doublepoint’s four founders. The newly-acquired company will remain in its native Helsinki, where it will work with Oura’s international teams.

It added that Doublepoint’s expertise in helping devices register subtle hand movements will be key, as nobody wearing a smart ring is going to engage with gesture control if they have to thrash their hand around like a conductor.

Apple Blocks US Users From Downloading ByteDance’s Chinese Apps

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired:
While TikTok operates in the United States under new ownership, Apple has deployed technical restrictions to block iOS users in the United States from downloading other apps made by the video platform’s Chinese parent organization ByteDance. ByteDance owns a vast array of different apps spanning social media, entertainment, artificial intelligence, and other sectors. The leading one is Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, which has over 1 billion monthly active users. While most of those users reside in China, iPhone owners around the world have traditionally been able to download these apps from anywhere without using a VPN, as long as they have a valid App Store account registered in China.

That’s not true anymore. Starting in late January, iPhone users in the U.S. with Chinese App Store accounts began reporting that they were encountering new obstacles when they tried to download apps developed by ByteDance. WIRED has confirmed that even with a valid Chinese App Store account, downloading or updating a ByteDance-owned Chinese app is blocked on Apple devices located in the United States. Instead, a pop-up window appears that says, “This app is unavailable in the country or region you’re in.” The restriction appears to apply only to ByteDance-owned apps and not those developed by other Chinese companies.

The timing and technical specifics suggest the restriction is related to the deal TikTok agreed to in January to divest Chinese ownership of its U.S. operations. The agreement was the result of the so-called TikTok ban law passed by Congress in 2024, which also barred companies like Apple and Google from distributing other apps majority-owned by ByteDance. The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act states that no company can “distribute, maintain, or update” any app majority-controlled by ByteDance “within the land or maritime borders of the United States.”

The law was primarily aimed at TikTok, which has more than 100 million users in the U.S. and had been the subject of years of debate in Washington over whether its Chinese ownership posed a national security risk. But ByteDance also has dozens of other apps that at some point were also removed from Apple’s and Google’s app stores in the U.S.. Now it seems like the scope of impact has reached even more apps that are not technically designed for U.S. audiences, such as Douyin, the AI chatbot Doubao, and the fiction reading platform Fanqie Novel.

The letter of the law

By Local ID10T • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act states that no company can “distribute, maintain, or update” any app majority-controlled by ByteDance “within the land or maritime borders of the United States.”

Apple is following the law as written. So… Why is this a headline now?

System76 Comments On Recent Age Verification Laws

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
In a blog post on Thursday, System76 CEO Carl Richell criticized new state laws in California, Colorado, and New York that would require operating systems to verify users’ ages and expose that information to apps, arguing the rules are easy for kids to bypass and ultimately undermine privacy and freedom more than they protect minors.

“System76’s position is interesting given that they sell Linux-loaded desktops, workstations and laptops plus being an operating system vendor with their in-house Pop!_OS distribution and COSMIC desktop environment,” adds Phoronix’s Michael Larabel, noting that they’re also based out of Colorado. Here’s an excerpt from the post:
“A parent that creates a non-admin account on a computer, sets the age for a child account they create, and hands the computer over is in no different state. The child can install a virtual machine, create an account on the virtual machine and set the age to 18 or over. It’s a similar technique to installing a VPN to get around the Great Firewall of China (just consider that for a moment). Or the child can simply re-install the OS and not tell their parents. … In the case of Colorado’s and California’s bills, effectiveness is lost. In the case of New York’s bill, liberty is lost. In the case of centralized platforms, potential is lost. … The challenges we face are neither technical nor legal. The only solution is to educate our children about life with digital abundance. Throwing them into the deep end when they’re 16 or 18 is too late. It’s a wonderful and weird world. Yes, there are dark corners. There always will be. We have to teach our children what to do when they encounter them and we have to trust them.”
“We are accustomed to adding operating system features to comply with laws,” writes Richell, in closing. “Accessibility features for ADA, and power efficiency settings for Energy Star regulations are two examples. We are a part of this world and we believe in the rule of law. We still hope these laws will be recognized for the folly they are and removed from the books or found unconstitutional.”

Misses the point.

By DarkOx • Score: 3, Interesting Thread

“A parent that creates a non-admin account on a computer, sets the age for a child account they create, and hands the computer over is in no different state. The child can install a virtual machine, create an account on the virtual machine and set the age to 18 or over. It’s a similar technique to installing a VPN to get around the Great Firewall of China (just consider that for a moment). Or the child can simply re-install the OS and not tell their parents. …

The system does not need to be entirely unbeatable. As so many people here point out, parents still need to parent their kids. Now if you look in on your kid every once in a while you might just notice them doing things like re-installing an OS, running a bunch of VMs etc, and as a parent have an opportunity to ask them some questions about why.

This whole idea that these measures need to be 100% effective to no be entirely useless is just wrong. I am even tempted to think given how much opponents of these rules spend thinking about they are entirely aware of that but use the argument anyway because they don’t want to be upfront about the real reasons for their opposition.

Re:Misses the point.

By Baloo Uriza • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
So we’re just ignoring the privacy and individual freedom problems with this, with zero to gain for it?

STOP PLAYING THE GAME

By PalmPreFan • Score: 3, Insightful Thread

We all know this is a pretext for digital ID. You do not have to play along. You can just refuse it all and say no. You are not a sheep. You are not a slave. You are not cattle. You have agency and free will in this world and in this life. Grow a spine and say “NO, I REFUSE”.

It’s not the same

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Shite argument, ADA helps people who potentially couldn’t use a system if not for laws. Age verification is a system for privacy invasion hanging onto the coattails of inept parents. Laws should protect children from bad parents. This primarily works by punishing said bad parents not by making the rest of society suffer for their inability. There have always been tools to protect children whilst not perfect are still orders of magnitude better than this implementation.

Re:Misses the point.

By StormReaver • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

You are not being asked for any proof or anything beyond your say so.

You are incredibly ignorant and naive if you think it will stop there. These are foot-in-the door steps. It’s typical first steps of a repressive regime.

Mozilla Is Working On a Big Firefox Redesign

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
darwinmac writes:
Mozilla is working on a huge redesign for its Firefox browser, codenamed “Nova,” which will bring pastel gradients, a refreshed new tab page, floating “island” UI elements, and more. “From the mockups, it appears Mozilla took some inspiration from Googles Material You (or at least, the dynamic color extraction part of it) because the browser color accent appears influenced by the wallpaper setting,” reports Neowin. “Choosing a mint-green desktop background automatically shifts the top navigation bars to match that exact shade.”

Mozilla has a habit of redesigning Firefox every few years. Before “Nova,” there was the "Proton” redesign in 2021, the "Photon” redesign in 2017, and the "Australis” redesign in 2014. Nova is still in early development, so it might take a year or two before it appears in an official stable Firefox release. Neowin adds: “Not every redesign project ends well for Mozilla, though. You might remember 2012’s Firefox Metro, an ambitious attempt to build a custom browser for Windows 8s touch-first interface. The team built it to operate both as a traditional desktop application and as a touch-optimized Metro app. The whole thing was scrapped in 2014 after two years in development due to a dismally low user adoption rate (a preview version of the software had been released a year earlier on the Aurora channel).”

As long as I can keep using the old look

By Zarhan • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

I’m using Firefox ESR so that I don’t have to do reconfiguration of the customizations at https://github.com/Aris-t2/Cus… except about once per year. As long those CSS customizations work then I’m fine with Mozilla foundation spending their money however they like. That addon is magnificent.

My Firefox still looks exactly like it did 10-15 years ago. I still get my status bar, I get my tabs below toolbars & address bar, and icons are still the same.

Yeah, stuck in my ways, I also use Openshell on the Windows PCs I have to use so I get Windows 7 look. I don’t mind learning a new UI paradigm if I see a clear benefit and it’s going to remain for a long while. Change for the sake of change…bah.

Grasp

By StormReaver • Score: 4, Informative Thread

It seems that Mozilla still has no clue why they’re getting their asses handed to them by Chrome. They need to stop fucking with the inconsequentials, and spend more time making their browser work. I have a few sites that just don’t work in Firefox, but work fine in Chrome.

Re:As long as I can keep using the old look

By lucifuge31337 • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Because these are tools not toys. My phone is also a tool not a toy that I wish thery would stop making UI changes to.

Re:Grasp

By Anaerin • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
A lot of that problem is web developers (and platforms) using vendor-locked prefixes for features they want to take advantage of, and not also checking for the generic versions.

Oh goodie. Hiding more things from the user.

By quonset • Score: 3 Thread

There used to be a time when you could go into Settings and easily find what you wanted to change, check or uncheck a box, and you were done. With the current version you have to dig through nebulous sounding locations with unclear nomeclature and hope you found what you’re looking for.

For example, if you wanted to manually remove all the saved cookies and such for specific web sites, you could go to Privacy and Security then open the Manage Data area. Everything was there in one location. No muss, no fuss.

Now you have to dig through at least two other boxes to find the same thing, and it doesn’t even work the same.

Are people trying to justify their existence, because that’s what it sounds like. Instead of keeping things simple and usable we’re now forced down the path of shiny for shiny’s sake.

Here’s a question: with all this reworking and “updating”, will we once again have the ability to check a checkbox and never be harassed about updates ever again? Is that too difficult to implement, because it used to be like that for decades until someone needed to show they were being “useful” on the project.

Iran War Provides a Large-Scale Test For AI-Assisted Warfare

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg, written by Katrina Manson:
The U.S. strikes on Iran ordered by President Donald Trump mark the arrival on a large scale of a new era of warfare assisted by artificial intelligence. Captain Timothy Hawkins, a Central Command spokesperson, told me last night that the AI tools the U.S. military is using in Iran operations don’t make targeting decisions and don’t replace humans. But they do help “make smarter decisions faster.” That’s been the driving ambition of the U.S. military, which has spent years looking at how to develop and deploy AI to the battlefield […].

Critics, such as Stop Killer Robots, a coalition of 270 human-rights groups, argue that AI-enabled decision-support systems reduce the separation between recommending and executing a strike to a “dangerously thin” line. Hawkins said the military’s use of AI assistance follows a rigorous process aligned with U.S. policy, military doctrine and the law. Artificial intelligence helps analysts whittle down what they need to focus on, generating so-called points of interest and helping personnel make “smart” decisions in the Iran operations, he told me. AI is also helping to pull data within systems and organize information to provide clarity.

Among the AI tech used in the Iran campaign is Maven Smart System, a digital mission control platform produced by Palantir […]. That emerged from Project Maven, a project started in 2017 by the Pentagon to develop AI for the battlefield. Among the large language models installed on the system is Anthropic’s Claude AI tool, according to the people, who said it has become central to U.S. operations against Iran and to accelerating Maven’s development. Claude is also at the center of a row that pits Anthropic against the Department of Defense over limits on the software.
Further reading: Hacked Tehran Traffic Cameras Fed Israeli Intelligence Before Strike On Khamenei

Re: Someone bombed a school next to a navy base

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

What business have the aggressors bombing anything over there? Has the trumpistan lost anything in Iran?

Perhaps your war criminals are looking for the test tube of Colin Powell and the rest of the “WMDs” that you hallucinated back in 2003?

I’m not convinced it wasn’t deliberate

By rsilvergun • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
Trump fired half of his anti-terrorist team the day before striking Iran and put a 22 year old former grocery store clerk in charge of it.

Trump is clearly hoping for a terrorist attack on US Soil. Something like 9/11. He saw what it did for Bush Jr’s poll numbers and he wants that. There are texts from Jeffery Epstein where he talks about Trump doing exactly that. Basically “If I go down I’m taking you all with me” is Trump’s mentality and always has been.

It’s probably why Trump has survived ripping off rich people several times. He’s got dirt on them all and they’re not sure they could arrange a “suicide” before he spilled the beans.

Re: I think it depends

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
That sort of AI makes perfect sense and has probably been in use long before LLMs came about.

Yeah, whatever

By dskoll • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The US clearly has overwhelming strength compared to Iran. And woo-woo high-tech! But, the USA is going to lose this war.

Why? Because the US has no clearly-defined goals. All the regime needs to do is survive, which it will: In the entire history of warfare, there has never been a regime change brought about by airstrikes alone. That will be a win for the regime and a loss for the USA. And it’s always the loser who decides when a war is over, so if the USA makes that decision… it’s the loser.

Israel is probably the only country that will benefit from this; it will have a couple of greatly weakened adversaries in Hezbollah and Iran.

Re:Yeah, whatever

By phantomfive • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

Because the US has no clearly-defined goals.

The goal is to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. The secondary objective is to prevent them from rebuilding their rocket supply. The third objective is to remove their support for terrorist proxies around the region.

The bonus objective is regime change.

Python ‘Chardet’ Package Replaced With LLM-Generated Clone, Re-Licensed

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Ancient Slashdot reader ewhac writes:
The maintainers of the Python package `chardet`, which attempts to automatically detect the character encoding of a string, announced the release of version 7 this week, claiming a speedup factor of 43x over version 6. In the release notes, the maintainers claim that version 7 is, “a ground-up, MIT-licensed rewrite of chardet.” Problem: The putative “ground-up rewrite” is actually the result of running the existing copyrighted codebase and test suite through the Claude LLM. In so doing, the maintainers claim that v7 now represents a unique work of authorship, and therefore may be offered under a new license. Version 6 and earlier was licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). Version 7 claims to be available under the MIT license.

The maintainers appear to be claiming that, under the Oracle v. Google decision, which found that cloning public APIs is fair use, their v7 is a fair use re-implementation of the `chardet` public API. However, there is no evidence to suggest their re-write was under “clean room” conditions, which traditionally has shielded cloners from infringement suits. Further, the copyrightability of LLM output has yet to be settled. Recent court decisions seem to favor the view that LLM output is not copyrightable, as the output is not primarily the result of human creative expression — the endeavor copyright is intended to protect. Spirited discussion has ensued in issue #327 on `chardet`s GitHub repo, raising the question: Can copyrighted source code be laundered through an LLM and come out the other end as a fresh work of authorship, eligible for a new copyright, copyright holder, and license terms? If this is found to be so, it would allow malicious interests to completely strip-mine the Open Source commons, and then sell it back to the users without the community seeing a single dime.

Why not apply this to code as well?

By FictionPimp • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that AI-generated artwork cannot be copyrighted because it lacks human authorship, reaffirming that copyright law requires works to be created by humans. This decision follows a case involving Stephen Thaler’s AI-generated artwork, which was denied copyright protection by the U.S. Copyright Office.

Feels wrong

By liqu1d • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
I don’t have a legal basis for this argument but it seems wrong to change the license on the project in such a manner. If the owner wanted to change it then it’s fine but it appears the current maintainer isn’t the owner. If they truly believe it’s legally unique then it should be created under its own repo and stop providing updates to the GPL one.

Re:Why not apply this to code as well?

By DarkOx • Score: 5, Informative Thread

This isn’t really the same question though.

Now that ruling may imply the newly generated library can’t be licensed at all because it can’t be copyrighted.

However the question is can you tell an LLM to re-implement some other IP and then claim that does not infringe on the original / isn’t subject to its license.

I honestly don’t understand why it would not come back to the same rulings that have been made about clean room implementations in the past and the fact that you can’t copyright an interface.

In the closed source case where we can assume the original could not have been in the training set, and you give claude nothing but the API doc and say make me a library that behaves exactly like this description - I don’t see how that could infringe on the original.

On the other hand if you provide the source to the original, I don’t see how it couldn’t. Just like if I renamed all the characters in Harry Potter, and used a thesaurus to replace every fifth word, JK Rolling would probably have little trouble suing me.

In the case FOSS where its down right probably the model was trained on the source, we are back to the unsettled questions of how much of the original content survives, how likely is the model to generate outputs that don’t materially differ from the original, and the usual cases by case disputes about when something is materially different…

Not clean room

By F.Ultra • Score: 4, Insightful Thread
This is clearly not a clean room since the LLVM was trained on the copyrighted source code and it also is not just a reimplementiaton of the API so Oracle v Google does not apply.

No.

By Local ID10T • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Can copyrighted source code be laundered through an LLM and come out the other end as a fresh work of authorship, eligible for a new copyright, copyright holder, and license terms?

That is simply creating a derivative work. Derivative works generally are infringing (various exceptions exist: fair use, etc.).

The maintainers appear to be claiming that, under the Oracle v. Google decision, which found that cloning public APIs is fair use, their v7 is a fair use re-implementation of the `chardet` public API.

This is a misrepresentation of the finding in Oracle v. Google. The finding was that APIs are not subject to copyright because they are statements of facts (e.g. function “blah” takes input integer, returns character) and are intentionally published for interoperability (like listing phone numbers in a phone book so that they can be called). How the underlying code is implemented is a separate issue.

Code may not be subject to copyright if the function can only be implemented in a particular way. If there are many ways to do a thing, then the particular way it is done may be copyrighted -and a different way of doing it would not be infringing. Either creating an different way of doing the thing if the original way is known, or by “clean-rooming” -creating a way of doing a thing knowing only the specifications would not be infringing on the copyright as similarity could be attributed to obviousness of the method and copyright protects creative expression.

Proton Mail Helped FBI Unmask Anonymous ‘Stop Cop City’ Protester

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
Longtime Slashdot reader AmiMoJo shares a report from 404 Media:
Privacy-focused email provider Proton Mail provided Swiss authorities with payment data that the FBI then used to determine who was allegedly behind an anonymous account affiliated with the Stop Cop City movement in Atlanta, according to a court record reviewed by 404 Media. The records provide insight into the sort of data that Proton Mail, which prides itself both on its end-to-end encryption and that it is only governed by Swiss privacy law, can and does provide to third parties. In this case, the Proton Mail account was affiliated with the Defend the Atlanta Forest (DTAF) group and Stop Cop City movement in Atlanta, which authorities were investigating for their connection to arson, vandalism and doxing. Broadly, members were protesting the building of a large police training center next to the Intrenchment Creek Park in Atlanta, and actions also included camping in the forest and lawsuits. Charges against more than 60 people have since been dropped.

There’s nothing surprising about this

By thegarbz • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Proton mail has strong privacy policy, privacy protection and minimal data retention. But if money changes hands some data is essentially retained as it is legally required. Any data retained is subject to discovery by a court order.

This doesn’t in any way minimise Proton Mail’s offering or promises. It’s worth remembering they are privacy focused, and not a dedicated service to obfuscate you. There’s a different.

Bad headline

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 5, Informative Thread

Proton Mail didn’t help the FBI.
Proton Mail acted in response to a lawful request made by Swiss authorities.
Those authorities helped the FBI.

Re:There’s nothing surprising about this

By CrankyFool • Score: 5, Informative Thread
Also, “helped FBI” is true but also misleading. Proton Mail does business in Switzerland, and is subject to Switzerland’s laws. The Swiss authorities made a lawful data request of Proton Mail, which Proton Mail had to oblige, and then the Swiss authorities shared that data with the FBI.

Re: Yes, courts can unmask people

By AcidFnTonic • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

It is just to unmask and intimidate a protestor who doesn’t want a bunch of cops getting funding.

I e. True enemy of the state who needs investigation, fund freezing, and more intimidation of course.

There was no arson you twat.

Oh shut up

By cfalcon • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

This isn’t news. Remember how it was reported the last time it happened?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/…

Proton mail has never, despite what is being claimed, promised to not store your IP address. A subpeona can compel them to do so, and it has in the past, and this will continue to happen. If your security depends on your IP address not being unmasked, you need to use at least one VPN.

If you self hosted then the subpeona would be delivered to your ISP, which will happily comply- likely quicker than protonmail.

NO EMAIL SERVICE WILL COMMIT A CRIME FOR YOU

If you only connect through VPNs, then the email service will provide the VPN’s IP. If the VPN is then contacted and they have no logs, then they will not be able to correlate the IP to a user. This is your only chance at anonymity under these circumstances: some VPN plus some private mail service that never knows your real IP address. Note that proton is a strong choice here because if you previously connected via your real IP they won’t have a log of that; they’ll only start saving your IP when they get a warrant. There are other equally strong private email choices, but ALL OF THEM WILL DELIVER YOUR IP IF THEY KNOW IT.

AI Startup Sues Ex-CEO Saying He Took 41GB of Email, Lied On Resume

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
Hayden AI, a San Francisco startup that makes spatial analytics tools for cities worldwide, has sued its co-founder and former CEO, alleging that he stole a large quantity of proprietary information in the days leading up to his ouster from the company in September 2024. In a lawsuit filed late last month in San Francisco Superior Court but only made public this week, Hayden AI claims that former CEO Chris Carson undertook what it called “numerous fraudulent actions,” which include “forged board signatures, unauthorized stock sales, and improper allocation of personal expenses.” […] Hayden AI, which is worth $464 million according to an estimated valuation on PitchBook, has asked the court to impose preliminary injunctive relief, requiring Carson to either return or destroy the data he allegedly stole.
Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that Carson secretly sold over $1.2 million in company stock, forged board signatures, and copied 41GB of proprietary company emails before being fired in September 2024. The complaint also claims Carson fabricated key parts of his resume, including a PhD and military service. It’s a “carefully constructed fraud,” says Hayden AI.
“That is a lie,” the complaint states. “Carson does not hold a PhD from Waseda or any other university. In 2007, he was not obtaining a PhD but was operating ‘Splat Action Sports,’ a paintball equipment business in a Florida strip mall.”

LOL

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 3 Thread

Hayden AI, which is worth $464 million

A bunch of vaping tiktokers who exchanged their models via email are “worth” half a billion?

To whom?

Two takeaways from this

By Arrogant-Bastard • Score: 5, Informative Thread
1. Nobody did any kind of due diligence whatsoever on this guy. NONE. And then they showed the same level of attentiveness to what he was doing: NONE. So while their lawsuit may have some merits, this entire sordid affair could have been prevented if someone, anyone, had exhibited minimal competence.

2. I have no doubt that this is epidemic in the entire AI sector. Of course it is: everyone is too busy hyping their products/services or soliciting venture capitalists or making insane predictions (“AI will solve global warming”) to spend any time doing the nuts-and-bolt work of running a solid business operation. This reminds me very much of the dot-com boom 30 years ago, when the exact same thing happened: any hustler who could talk a good game could land a job and a huge paycheck and then bail out before the roof caved in. (Some of them were sued, but most weren’t, because the companies that failed either no longer existed or lacked the resources to engage in protracted litigation.)

Co-Founder Resume?

By The Faywood Assassin • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Wait a minute.

How does a co-founder need a resume?

Do you need to apply to start a company?

The National Videogame Museum Acquires the Mythical Nintendo Playstation

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
The National Videogame Museum has acquired an extremely rare MSF-1 development kit, believed to be the oldest surviving prototype of the canceled Nintendo PlayStation. Engadget reports:
Nicknamed the Nintendo PlayStation, the idea was that a new CD-ROM format backed by Sony would be added to the cartridge-based Super NES, resulting in a hybrid console that could play both. The partnership didn’t last long, though, with Nintendo backing out before it ever really got off the ground, announcing that it would instead be working with Philips. Sony decided to make the PlayStation on its own instead, in an act of revenge that you have to say paid off in the long run, and we never did get to see Crash Bandicoot running around the Mushroom Kingdom. Still, the short-lived Nintendo PlayStation remains a fascinating what-if scenario in video game history, and the USA’s National Video Museum has acquired the original development kit.

Florida Woman Gets Prison Time For Illegally Selling Microsoft Product Keys

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A Florida woman was sentenced to 22 months in federal prison and fined $50,000 for illegally trafficking thousands of Microsoft certificate-of-authenticity labels used to activate Windows and Office. Prosecutors said she bought genuine labels cheaply from suppliers and resold them without the accompanying licensed software, wiring over $5 million during the scheme. TechRadar reports:
The indictment details how [52-year-old Heidi Richards] purchased tens of thousands of genuine COA labels from a Texas-based supplier between 2018 and 2023 for well below the retail value, before reselling them in bulk to customers globally without the licensed software. “COA labels are not to be sold separately from the license and hardware that they are intended to accompany, and they hold no independent commercial value,” the US Attorney’s Office wrote.

Richards was found to have wired $5,148,181.50 to the unnamed Texas company during the scheme’s operation. Some examples include the purchase of 800 Windows 10 COA labels in July 2018 for $22,100 (under $28 each) and a further 10,000 Windows 10 Pro COA labels in December 2022 for $200,000 ($20 each). Ultimately fined $50,000 and given a near-two-year sentence, prosecutors had sought to get Richards to pay $242,000, “which represents the proceeds obtained from the offenses.”

Nice business model

By nikkipolya • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Spend 22 months in jail with free food and what not if caught and pay only $50,000. After wiring $5 million That’s a sweet deal! Many would be tempted to go this route. Especially when getting jobs is becoming harder.

Re:Huh?

By sabbede • Score: 4, Interesting Thread
Well, the linked indictment lists the crime as a violation of 18 U.S.C. 2318 (I wonder if that section symbol will come through) - Trafficking in Counterfeit Labels.

But what I find odd is that Microsoft did sue the Texas company that sold her the labels. That suit was in 2017, and the crimes Heidi was convicted of began in 2018. And the Texas company is listed as an unindicted co-conspirator.
But why? It seems to me like the Texas company was the real offender, especially after they got sued for what they were doing and kept doing it. And got paid $5 million in the process. How did that happen? Did they get off by throwing her under the bus? That just sounds like giving the head of a drug cartel a deal for testifying against a street-level dealer. Backwards.
My best guess would be that as part of a settlement with Microsoft, they agreed to help in a sting against their buyers. But I’m just guessing.

(the section symbol didn’t come through at all. Just imagine a double-s between U.S.C. and 2318)

Re:Nice business model

By sabbede • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
I don’t think it’s that sweet. First, that’s $50k on top of them seizing everything she has as the proceeds of a crime. Then, after almost two years of lousy meals in terrible circumstances, she goes back into the world as a convicted felon, and has an even harder time finding work.

Re:Nice business model

By El_Muerte_TDS • Score: 5, Funny Thread

Could always run for president of the USA

Re: Huh?

By BKX • Score: 4, Insightful Thread

Microsoft themselves actually did go after the Texas company nearly a decade ago and won. Why the government didn’t prosecute them criminally as well is beyond me.

As far the the scam goes, I think people aren’t wrote realizing that the CoA stickers aren’t the license to use Windows. Will they activate a copy of Windows? Probably. I have no idea if Microsoft can blacklist blocks of stickers or not. I think what people are missing is that someone has to print up those stickers. This lady just bought a few rolls of those stickers under the table from the printer. But she definitely didn’t buy licenses from Microsoft and I don’t think, realistically, that she could have thought otherwise. Technically, when she was selling those stickers, it was a type of fraud because she didn’t have the Windows licenses to sell, just the stickers, but any ordinary buyer is going to see the sticker and think they’re getting a license, when they technically aren’t. You don’t really need to give out DVDs or other installation media anymore; anyone can get that from Microsoft’s website for free.

(I would also like to point out that I think the person I’m replying to probably knows all of paragraph 2 already; I’m just making it explicit.)

AI Translations Are Adding ‘Hallucinations’ To Wikipedia Articles

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:
Wikipedia editors have implemented new policies and restricted a number of contributors who were paid to use AI to translate existing Wikipedia articles into other languages after they discovered these AI translations added AI “hallucinations,” or errors, to the resulting article. The new restrictions show how Wikipedia editors continue to fight the flood of generative AI across the internet from diminishing the reliability of the world’s largest repository of knowledge. The incident also reveals how even well-intentioned efforts to expand Wikipedia are prone to errors when they rely on generative AI, and how they’re remedied by Wikipedia’s open governance model.
The issue centers around a program run by the Open Knowledge Association (OKA), a nonprofit that was found to be “mostly relying on cheap labor from contractors in the Global South” to translate English Wikipedia articles into other languages. Some translators began using tools like Google Gemini and ChatGPT to speed up the process, but editors reviewing the work found numerous hallucinations, including factual errors, missing citations, and references to unrelated sources.

“Ultimately the editors decided to implement restrictions against OKA translators who make multiple errors, but not block OKA translation as a rule,” reports 404 Media.

Treat all AI edits as vandalism

By xack • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Wikipedia is designed for humans to read, and is created by humans, AI editing is basically copy and pasting unreferenced slop, unlike humans that cite other human created text, AI just pulls out of its ass an alphabet soup of training data. AI is in fact worse than vandalism as at least vandalism is based on human creativity. If Wikipedia doesn’t implement a 100% human contributions only policy, it will drown in slop. They should also lead by example and start mass deleting bot articles and rebuild them with human sources. Wikipedia should basically disable the paste button to non auto-confirmed users and only enable it once they have signed a human only declaration like you have to do at college now.

WP editors are NOT known for using best practices

By crath • Score: 5, Insightful Thread
Automated translation best practice: translate to the foreign language, then translate the output back through the bot into the starting language to confirm the translation. Wikipedia editors are NOT known for employing best practices.

Hey, that’s MY job

By i kan reed • Score: 3 Thread

How dare AI still my job of adding inaccurate information to wikipedia articles for no reason.

IBM Scientists Unveil First-Ever ‘Half-Mobius’ Molecule

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
BrianFagioli shares a report from NERDS.xyz:
An international team of scientists has done something chemistry has never seen before. IBM, working alongside researchers from the University of Manchester, Oxford University, ETH Zurich, EPFL, and the University of Regensburg, has created and characterized a molecule whose electrons travel through its structure in a corkscrew-like pattern, fundamentally altering its chemical behavior. The findings were published today in Science. The molecule, known as C13Cl2, is the first experimental observation of what scientists call a half-Mobius electronic topology in a single molecule. To the researchers’ knowledge, nothing like it has ever been synthesized, observed, or even formally predicted. And proving why it behaves the way it does required something equally extraordinary — a quantum computer.

The whole thing started at IBM, where the molecule was assembled atom by atom from a custom precursor synthesized at Oxford. Working under ultra-high vacuum at near-absolute-zero temperatures, researchers used precisely calibrated voltage pulses to remove individual atoms one at a time. The result is an electronic structure that undergoes a 90-degree twist with each circuit through the molecule, requiring four complete loops to return to its starting phase. That is a topological property that has no counterpart anywhere in chemistry’s existing record. What makes it even more interesting to folks who follow materials science is that this topology can be switched. The molecule can move reversibly between clockwise-twisted, counterclockwise-twisted, and untwisted states. That means electronic topology is not just a curiosity to be stumbled upon in nature — it can be deliberately engineered. That is a big deal.

The quantum computing angle here is not just a supporting role. Electrons within C13Cl2 interact in deeply entangled ways, each influencing the others simultaneously. Modeling that requires tracking every possible configuration of those interactions at once — something that causes computational demands to grow exponentially and can quickly overwhelm classical machines. A decade ago, researchers could exactly model 16 electrons classically. Today that number has crept to 18. Using IBM’s quantum computer, the team was able to explore 32 electrons. Quantum computers can represent these systems directly rather than approximate them, because they operate according to the same quantum mechanical laws that govern electrons in molecules. In this case, that capability helped reveal helical molecular orbitals for electron attachment — a fingerprint of the half-Mobius topology — and exposed the mechanism behind the unusual structure: a helical pseudo-Jahn-Teller effect.

Quantum computer required? Oh really?

By Viol8 • Score: 4, Interesting Thread

Given QCs are currently still at the experiemental/useless stage thats highly unlikely. From RTFA it looks like what they actually did was use actual electrons to model the behaviour of the ones in the molecule. But why let that stop IBM doing a PR puff piece for their somewhat in the weeds QC division. Certainly an interesting discovery however.

Re:Quantum computer required? Oh really?

By ledow • Score: 4, Funny Thread

Look, if we don’t start hyping QC, then we’re just going to be stuck in his AI-slop-fad for another year.

I’d far rather we were wasting on money on physics than enriching companies that literally cannot make a profit when they have trillions of dollars in their bank accounts.

Congress Extends ISS, Tells NASA To Get Moving On Private Space Stations

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
A recently-revised Senate authorization bill (PDF), co-sponsored by Senate Commerce Committee Chair Ted Cruz, would extend the International Space Station’s lifespan from 2030 to 2032 while pushing NASA to accelerate plans for commercial space stations to replace it. Ars Technica’s Eric Berger reports:
Regarding NASA’s support for the development of commercial space stations, the bill mandates the following, within specified periods, of passage of the law:

- Within 60 days, publicly release the requirements for commercial space stations in low-Earth orbit
- Within 90 days, release the final “request for proposals” to solicit industry responses
- Within 180 days, enter into contracts with “two or more” commercial providers for such stations

Cruz is trying to inject urgency into NASA as several private companies — including Axiom Space, Blue Origin, Vast, and Voyager — are finalizing designs for space stations. All have expressed a desire for clarity from NASA on how long the space agency would like its astronauts to stay on board, the types of scientific equipment needed, and much more. These are known as “requirements” in NASA parlance.

[…] Cruz and other senators on the committee appear to share those concerns, as their legislation extends the International Space Station’s lifespan from 2030 to 2032 (an extension must still be approved by international partners, including Russia). Moreover, the authorization bill states, “The Administrator shall not initiate the de-orbit of the ISS until the date on which a commercial low-Earth orbit destination has reached an initial operational capability.” With this legislation, the U.S. Senate is making clear that it views a permanent human presence in low-Earth orbit as a high priority. This version of the authorization legislation must still be passed by the full Senate and work its way through the House of Representatives.

I’m a bit surprised

By 93 Escort Wagon • Score: 5, Funny Thread

I didn’t think Ted Cruz realized the earth was round.

Space civilizations needed

By backslashdot • Score: 3 Thread

The Earth has started to suck. People are too tribalist and idiotic. The only temporary escape is space colonies. But what’s going to happen though when “nations” start claiming entire zones of space? Fuck that. Tribalism must end.

Re:Space civilizations needed

By spacexfangirl • Score: 5, Funny Thread
Give it about 11 minutes after the first space colony launches. The people from New Plymouth Crater will insist they’re nothing like those oxygen-stealing freeloaders from Beta Dome. The proud citizens of the Glorious Republic of Elon’s Folly will claim the ice mines of Upper Crater 7 as their sacred ancestral vacuum. Meanwhile the Free Asteroid Commune of Rock #482B will blockade shipping because the Jovian Belt Confederation insulted their flag.

NASA

By ArchieBunker • Score: 4, Informative Thread

1) Give NASA a proper budget
2) Congress should stop interfering

Did congress or the president micromanage them during the 1950s thru 1970s?

Microsoft Confirms ‘Project Helix,’ a Next-Gen Xbox That Can Run PC Games

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot Skip
An anonymous reader quotes a report from 80 Level:
Microsoft has officially confirmed development of its next-generation Xbox console, currently known internally as Project Helix. While concrete details remain limited, early information suggests the company is positioning the device as a hybrid between a traditional console and a gaming PC, capable of running both Xbox titles and PC games. The codename was revealed recently by new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, who reaffirmed Microsoft’s continued commitment to dedicated gaming hardware despite speculation that the company might shift entirely toward cloud or platform-based ecosystems. According to Sharma, Project Helix represents the next step in Xbox’s console strategy.

Although official specifications have not yet been announced, early reports indicate the system will likely rely on a new AMD system-on-chip combining Xbox hardware with PC-style architecture. The device is expected to emphasize high performance while maintaining compatibility with existing Xbox game libraries. […] If the concept holds, Project Helix could mark a significant shift in how console ecosystems are structured, moving away from tightly closed hardware platforms toward something closer to a unified PC-console environment.
Sharma wrote in a post on X: “Great start to the morning with Team Xbox, where we talked about our commitment to the return of Xbox, including Project Helix, the code name for our next generation console. Project Helix will lead in performance and play your Xbox and PC games. Looking forward to chatting about this more with partners and studios at my first GDC next week!”

Solid code name

By Anonymous Coward • Score: 4, Funny Thread

But the question is - what terrible name will they give it for release?

Too late.

By SeaFox • Score: 3 Thread

Someone already beat them making the “new ‘box”.
Those execs are really earning their tremendous salaries with these innovative ideas.

Hypervisor?

By Pinky’s Brain • Score: 3 Thread

If they are using a hypervisor and passing the GPU between an XBOX VM and a Windows VM, I’d like to see them go the other way too.

Have a XBOX mode for verified hardware, which can run games in a big-screen XBOX mode through the XBOX VM.

Forgetting your roots.

By geekmux • Score: 3 Thread

Microsoft now claims an Xbox running PC games, is a feature that we should be in awe over.

This is like watching Ford bring back the Pinto and brag about how cool a hatchback feature would be today. You guys DO remember who made the Windows PC rather ubiquitous, right?

I have a box that runs Windows that plays PC games too. I call it a PC instead of paying more to call it an Xbox. Been playing PC games on it for a couple decades now.

Re:Just another classistexploitive platform

By mccalli • Score: 4, Informative Thread
And the home computer wars started before the console ways. British playgrounds in the 1980s were full of ZX Spectrum vs BBC Micro, and later vs Commodore 64. Throw in the Amstrads, Dragon32, Oric Atmos and I even knew someone with a New Brain and you’ve got yourself a party.

Pentagon Formally Designates Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk

Posted by BeauHD View on SlashDot
The Pentagon has formally designated Anthropic as a “supply chain risk,” ordering federal agencies and defense contractors to stop using its AI tools after the company sought limits on the military’s use of its models. In a written statement, the department said it has “officially informed Anthropic leadership the company and its products are deemed a supply chain risk, effective immediately.” Politico reports:
The designation, historically reserved for foreign firms with ties to U.S. adversaries, will likely require companies that do business with the U.S. military — or even the federal government in general — to cut ties with Anthropic.

“From the very beginning, this has been about one fundamental principle: the military being able to use technology for all lawful purposes,” the Pentagon said in the statement. “The military will not allow a vendor to insert itself into the chain of command by restricting the lawful use of a critical capability and put our warfighters at risk.”

A spokesperson for Anthropic did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But the company said last week it would fight a supply-chain risk label in court.

Re:“You can beat the rap, but you can’t beat the r

By swillden • Score: 5, Interesting Thread

The government will lose in court… eventually. But the punishment will have already taken place.

Capitulate or suffer the consequences. Resistance is painful.

Painful, but how painful, really? The publicity has boosted Anthropic’s subscriptions significantly, and the summary overstates the impact of the label. It is not true that all companies that do business with the DoD will have to cut ties with Anthropic, the label just means that companies that do business with the DoD can’t use Anthropic’s AI on their DoD contracts. They’re still free to use it for any non-DoD work they do, or to run their own business operations.

So, yes, it’ll inflict some pain, but I think they can handle it. Anthropic is far healthier than Open AI, financially.

Re:“All lawful purposes” is a lie

By swillden • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

From the very beginning, this has been about one fundamental principle: the military being able to use technology for all lawful purposes.

There is no such principle, this is completely made up. To make it worse, there are basically no laws restricting AI use, which means the Pentagon is asserting that they must be able to use it for literally anything they want to.

Well, to be fair, there are legal restrictions on what the DoD can do. For example, they can’t blow up random boats off of the South American coast, they can’t occupy American cities, they can’t unilaterally invade a foreign country and kidnap its head of state, and they can’t just start bombing shit without any congressional authorization.

So, you know, they’re restricted to using the AI only for things that they are legally allowed to do.

Re:This is Incredibly Frightening

By caseih • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

I take no joy in it. It’s amazing to me how quickly constitutional democracy is dying in the US, and how few of my American friends actually care (they honestly believe that the next guy will be a sane Republican and everything will go back to normal). If it was only their own lives they were ruining I might not care so much, but this is extending now far beyond the United States. The same forces that are tearing down the institutions of democracy and making a mockery of everything the founding fathers stood for are also marshaling in other countries including mine.

Re: Good

By Mr. Dollar Ton • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

What is “positive”, the practice of the trumpistani government to blackmail private businesses for personal gain of the president?

Methinks your judgement is a bit short-sighted here.

Re:Sounds like securities fraud to me

By Bumbul • Score: 5, Insightful Thread

There’s a word for this: extortion. The military has decided that if they cannot use Anthropic’s technology in any way they please, that they will just ban all government use, in an attempt to force the company to violate their principles. Here’s hoping Anthropic shows them that the real world doesn’t work that way by spanking them with a volley of lawsuits that will keep government lawyers employed for the next decade.

Yes, this is extortion, and I think Pentagon has shot themselves in the foot with this. Other companies will now think twice before doing any business with Pentagon. Sure, they might get a few extra bucks from a DoD deal, but they also risk losing many times that, if/when Pentagon uses this extortion tactic again.